WPC <| E!pf+jQJޥ5iN@^NгI|/qWR\9gP9 ۳$N4!pl ljV^ 㙨9S΋5Yl-~# dعG $dy*8 ohǬ@r0@F{O›o!s+Vym:/yE3d ǰ1VYօ@&?怒f@Y@XaUƂօ w 1U2 ZX7-Z}X6 )x+e.3~քy")N.;PfbU )ݫa*}=Ӫu?y[W{H.pٽ1+5Y`C_5|WBO;~xR D}@.W&fu;Xz.r=~dC1]܊’O Bn`#!@U:a % 0: 1 72b 1u 72 0c; 0 ^ c wo 4s   m 0D AQ U,D Np r U,z G B   0V 0V& 0D|| D3HP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0,cAZ"Arial RegularX($USUS.,(CEKQW]cioAutoList1i.i.i.i.i.i.i.i.i.##37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  (u(2$ !USUS.,  X  +};+XX `   0  g$(L tpO'$͠ lѠ3|xU(#$  0  Z[\]_C<<C,  AZArial  ,rAZArial  = ["USUS.,  FXX  _  Ad FILED[F  January4,2000Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourt_ClerkdAk _ dLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(.3$ !USUS.,  (.3$ !USUS.,  ($$   1  YYYY'dxd !USUS.,  _TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'TX  _v_@0,j: `@Ett( Wv__INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  ATKNOXVILLE | NOVEMBER1999SESSION  GORDONSCOTTHOBBS,0  0%%)  %%  `     h     )0 p C.C.A.No.03C019908CR00317  p%p%  ` Appellant,0  0h%%0h%h%0%%) %%  `     h     )0 p BledsoeCountyx p%p% b (83bv.0 ` 0 ` %` %0 % %0h%%0h%h%0%%)^ %%  `     h     )0 p HonorableThomasW.Graham,JudgeD p%p% JAMESBOWLEN,Warden,    ) *z  andSTATEOFTENNESSEE,    )0 p (HabeasCorpus)`p%p%  `     h     ) ` Appellees.0  0h%%0h%h%0%%),%% ForAppellant:0  0h%%0h%h%0%%0p%%ForAppellees:&vp%p% GordonScottHobbs,prose     p MichaelE.Moore B #94583    h      p SolicitorGeneral * Route4,Box600Pikeville,TN37367 h      p EllenH.Pollack   `     h      p AssistantAttorneyGeneral `     h      p 425FifthAvenueNorth `     h      p Nashville,TN372430493 `     h      p JamesW.Pope,III `     h      p AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral̀    h      p 375ChurchStreet %@!%  `     h      p Dayton,TN37321OPINIONFILED:_____________________________________AFFIRMEDALANE.GLENN,JUDGE  :5< _   #XX8ޒXXdd8  OPINION     XޒX#XޒXXXޒ ` Thepetitioner,GordonS.Hobbs,wasconvictedonJanuary28,1981,inthe  HamiltonCountyCircuitCourtoffirstdegreemurderandassaultwithintenttocommitfirst \  degreemurderandsentencedtotwolifesentencestobeservedconsecutively.Thiscourt ( x affirmedtheconvictionsandsentencesonNovember12,1981,andoursupremecourt  D  deniedpermissiontoappealonFebruary22,1982.Thepetitionerfiledapetitionforwrit   ofhabeascorpusintheBledsoeCountyCircuitCourtin1999,claimingthathehadbeen   incompetenttostandtrialin1981.Thetrialcourtdismissedthepetitionwithout X  appointmentofcounselorahearingonthematter,andthepetitionertimelyappealed. $t Baseduponourreview,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.#XޒXXXޒ # @  ` Thispetitionerappearstohavemadeacottageindustryoffilingpostconviction  petitions,thisbeingatleasthisninth.Baseduponthefactthathecontinuestoraise T variationsuponthesamecomplaints,itdoesnotappearthatanyofthesepetitionshave  p resultedinreliefofanysort.Alistingofthepreviouspetitionsisasfollows:GordonScott < Hobbsv.State,No.03C019803CR00089,1998WL667867(Tenn.Crim.App.,   Knoxville,Sept.23,1998),perm.app.denied(Tenn.1999)(claimofineffectiveassistance "! ofcounselbecauseoffailuretointroduceevidenceofVietnamstressdisorder,explosive P$# disorder,andmajordepression);GordonScottHobbsv.State,No.03C01930300071, &l!% 1995WL39349(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Feb.2,1995)(ineffectiveassistanceof '8#' counselbecausehewasnotadvisedwhethertoacceptaproposednegotiatedplea )%) agreement);GordonScottHobbsv.State,No.03C019303CR00071,1993WL539494 +&+ (Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Dec.22,1993),perm.app.denied(Tenn.1994)(ineffective L-(- assistanceofcounselbecausehewasnotadvisedwhethertoacceptaproposed /h*/ negotiatedpleaagreement);GordonScottHobbsv.State,No.03C01-9106CR-00178, 04,1 1992WL77657(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,April20,1992),perm.app.denied(Tenn. 2.3 1992)(claim,interalia,thathewasinsaneatthetimeofhistrial);GordonScottHobbsv. |4/5 State,No.919(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Aug.6,1985);GordonScottHobbsv.State, L617 No.___(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Nov.12,1981),perm.app.denied(Tenn.1982). 8h39  945; Ї ` Apparently,hehasalsofiledintheUnitedStatesDistrictCourtfortheEastern  DistrictofTennesseeatleasttwopetitionsforthewritofhabeascorpusandatleastthree | 42U.S.C.1983civilrightsactions.Reliefwasdeniedinallcases.Hobbsv.Speal,No. H 905028,1990WL193113(6thCir.Dec.9,1990)(affirmingdistrictcourtdismissalof42  d U.S.C.1983actionagainstmentalhealthcareprofessionalswhoevaluatedHobbs  0 beforehistrial);Hobbsv.Heck,No.905029,1990WL193143(6thCir.Dec.9,1990)    (affirmingdistrictcourtdismissalof42U.S.C.1983actionagainstHobbsstrial x  attorneys);Hobbsv.Speal,No.885428,1988WL121251(6thCir.Nov.15,1988) D  (affirmingdistrictcourtsdismissalof42U.S.C.1983actionagainstmentalhealthcare ` professionalswhoevaluatedHobbsbeforehistrialandalsocitingearlierdistrictcourt , decision,GordonScottHobbsv.MichaelDutton,Civ186067(E.D.Tenn.Aug.14,1987)  (mem.),whichreviewedissueofcompetencyattrialonthemerits);GordonScottHobbs t v.HowardCarlton,No.Civ-1-89-269,(E.D.Tenn.Oct.12,1989),affd,No.90-5030(6th @ Cir.May3,1990)(denialoffederalhabeascorpuspetitioncitedinGordonScottHobbsv.  \ State,No.03C019106CR00178,1993WL539494(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Dec. ( 22,1993));Hobbsv.Dutton,No.876014,1988WL18153(E.D.Tenn.Mar.3,1988)  (dismissingpetitionforwritofhabeascorpusclaimingineffectiveassistanceofcounsel, p!  improperjuryinstructions,andsuppressedevidence). <#"  ` Awritofhabeascorpuswillproperlylieonlywhenitappearsonthefaceofthe &$"& judgmentsaboutwhichthepetitionercomplains,theconvictionsarevoidorthetermofhis (#( imprisonmenthasexpired.Tenn.CodeAnn.2921101(1980);Passarellav.State,891 l*%* S.W.2d619,626(Tenn.Crim.App.),perm.app.denied(Tenn.1994).Thepetitionerhas 8,', theburdenofestablishingbyapreponderanceoftheevidencethatthejudgmentisvoid .T). orhistermofimprisonmenthasexpired.Passarella,891S.W.2dat627.Thetrialcourt / +0 maysummarilydismissthepetitionifitfailstostateacognizableclaim.Nohearingor 1,2 otherinquiryintotheallegationsinthepetitionisrequired.Id. h3.4  ` Noevidenceexistsintherecordtoshowthepetitionersjudgmentsofconvictionare 7P28 void.Infact,thejudgmentsthemselvesarenotapartoftherecord.Nordoestherecord 84: containevidenceindicatingthepetitionerssentenceshaveexpired.Thepetitionerscase  hasbeenreviewedondirectappealandonotherpreviouspetitionsforpostconviction | reliefatleastninetimes.Thetrialcourtwascorrectindenyingthepetitionforitfailsto H stateacognizableclaim.Evenifthetrialcourthadconsideredthepetitionforhabeas  d corpusasapetitionforpostconvictionrelief,thepetitionwouldhavebeentimebarredand  0 barredasasubsequentpetition.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4030202(1997).Nothing    beforeuswarrantsreversalofthetrialcourtsdenialofrelief. x  Ѐ ` Baseduponourreviewofthismatter,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. ` X XXXޒ `     h     _____________________________________ t  `     h     ALANE.GLENN,JUDGE d CONCUR: $t __________________________________ !$  DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE "! ___________________________________ t'"& JOEH.WALKER,III,SPECIALJUDGE d(#'  `     h      p      x #XޒX XX+#Ԁ