WPC8 T|Jbaqٺ!`k0bqcCNo59䫃)-BA.JӞZIn  z{Bpc^˰L+#~W;`y?M| 57 zs#LRc YMñn8FM^"a>w@|z}a7*qښ V!}6$uɑl 䤮yZ1.bL(N7a&%AEQvk ~H31݇ Y"Ntwsv%::慠BB%CoHJ}#-B(W$ 0v$ 0` % 0`k% 0`% 0`+& 0`& 08& 0#' 02' 0'( 0:#) 0Y]) 0_) 0 * 0j+ 0, B* . D/7. 0f. D// 00 060 01 0:%2 0^_2 0<2U62U>/3U*m333 03333 B44 04 D3K5 D-~5 0K55 AS5I6 07 0D7 A7Q-s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularPH,:i+003|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6,,,,0*+ (_2623  ..Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5*G+M (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *D+M (_24   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *A+M (_23  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *>+M (_22   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *;+M (_21   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *8+M (_20  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *5+M (_19   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *2+M (_18    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  * (_1723  Ԁ*GM (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *DM (_15   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *AM (_14  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *>M (_13   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *;M (_12   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *8M (_11  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *5M (_10   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  (2M &_9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  ( &_823  (GM &_7   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  (DM &_6   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  (AM &_5  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  (>M &_4   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  (;M &_3   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  (8M &_2  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  (5M &_1   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  &2M $_    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  - -0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1      (&H2  (&H3  (&H4 XXX (&H5  (&H6  20Address8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKM<6X9`(Courier NewKSN\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KM<6X9`(Courier NewKSN\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/KM<6X9`(Courier NewKSN\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7D(X7  ?O%2A`Arial?  SN\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7&  d dC)1dxd<:zTop of For7F(X7  ?O%2A`Arial?  SN\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7C)2dxd0KS.SampleKM<6X9`(Courier NewKSN\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKM<6X9`(Courier NewKSN\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  <6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial (|G2$ !.8dd8         0   d(|3?{$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?{$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _   8QXXdd8@tt\INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#\ #Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsMay21,2002 L XQX #XXQ#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.SHAWNMARTIN_HOLDAWAY_XQX  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforLincolnCounty  J @@No.S0000031CharlesLee,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200102359CCAR3CDFiledAugust2,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     DefendantappealsdenialofCommunityCorrectionssentence.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrial x  court. d  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed  <   #XQ#XQX.JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichThomasT._Woodall_and d NormaMcGeeOgle,JJ.,joined. P DonnaLeigh_Hargrove_,DistrictPublicDefender,andAndrewJackson_Dearing_,IIIandMichaelJ. ( Collins,AssistantPublicDefenders,fortheappellant,ShawnMartin_Holdaway_.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;HelenaWalton_Yarbrough_,AssistantAttorney  General;WilliamMichael_McCown_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andAnnL.Filer,AssistantDistrict  AttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. t @@OO& OPINION #XXQ%#XQX 8!      DefendantShawn_Holdaway_ԀwasindictedbyaLincolnCountygrandjuryfortheftofvarious #`" itemsfromWalMartvaluedatbetween$1,000and$10,000.Defendantpledguiltyand,subsequent #L# toasentencinghearing,wassentencedtosixyearsandninemonthsinconfinement.Timelynotice $8 $ ofappealfollowed.Defendantappealshissentenceonly. %$!%   Theevidenceatthesentencinghearingrevealedthatdefendantcommittedtheftbecausehe '"' wasgettingbehindonchildsupportobligationsatatimewhenhewasunabletomaintainsteady (#( employment.Defendanttestifiedthathelivedwithhisexwifeandtwostepchildrenwhenhe )$) committedtheoffenses,andhewastryingtosupportthem. p*%*   Theevidenceshowsthatdefendantwaspreviouslyconvictedforaggravatedburglary,two H,', theftsover$1,000,anddrugpossessionwhileincarcerated.Allfourcrimeswerefelonies.Hehad 4-(- _alsobeenconvictedofthefollowingmisdemeanors:drivingonarevokedlicense,violationofthe  opencontainerlaw,twochargesofvandalism,drivingwhileintoxicated,andtheftupto$500.    Thepresentencereportalsoshowsthatwhendefendantwasconvictedfordrivingunderthe t influence,aportionofthesentencewastobeservedonprobation.Whileonprobation,defendant ` wasarrestedforaggravatedburglaryandtheft.Shortlythereafter,hewasagainarrestedfordrug L  possession.Theevidencerevealsthatdefendantandhiswifewereatonetimedivorced.Theythen 8  reunited,andhewaslivingwithheratthetimetheoffenseswerecommitted.Itwasestablishedthat $ t thedivorcewasenteredinBedfordCountyChanceryCourt,butneitherdefendantnorhisexwife  ` livedinthatcountyasrequiredandswornbydefendant.Thecourtnotedthatsuchanactconstituted  L  fraud.  8    Finally,theevidenceshowsthatdefendantwasorderedtopay$35.00weeklytowardsthe   attorneyfeesofhisappointedtrialcounselinthiscaseandthathedeliberatelyrefusedtocomply   withthecourtsorder.     Thecourtsentenceddefendanttosixyearsandninemonthsinconfinementanddenied p defendantsrequestforalternativesentences. \   Whenacriminaldefendantchallengesthelength,range,ormannerofserviceofasentence, 4 thereviewingcourtmustconductadenovoreviewofthesentencewithapresumptionthatthe  p determinationsmadebythetrialcourtarecorrect.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-401(d)(1997).This  \ presumption,however,is conditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialcourt H consideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Ashby,823 4 S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Intheeventtherecordfailstoshowsuchconsideration,thereview   ofthesentenceispurelydenovo.Statev.Shelton,854S.W.2d116,123(Tenn.Crim.App.1992).   TheSentencingCommissionCommentsprovidethattheburdenisonthedefendanttoshowthe  improprietyofthesentence.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-401,SentencingCommissionComments.    Ourreviewrequiresananalysisof(1)theevidence,ifany,receivedatthetrialandsentencing l hearing;(2)thepresentencereport;(3)theprinciplesofsentencingandtheargumentsofcounsel X  relativetosentencingalternatives;(4)thenatureandcharacteristicsoftheoffense;(5)anymitigating D! orenhancingfactors;(6)anystatementsmadebythedefendantinhisownbehalf;and(7)the 0"  defendantspotentialforrehabilitationortreatment.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-102,-103,-210; #l! Statev.Smith,735S.W.2d859,863(Tenn.Crim.App.1987). $X"   AdefendantwhoisanespeciallymitigatedorstandardoffenderconvictedofaClassC,D, %0!$ orEfelonyispresumedtobeafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencingoptionsintheabsence &"% ofevidencetothecontrary.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-102(6)(1997).However,adefendantwho '#& commits themostsevereoffenses,possess[esa]criminalhistoryevincingacleardisregardforthe (#' lawsandmoralsofsociety,and[hasfailed]pasteffortsatrehabilitationdoesnotenjoythis )$(  presumption.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-102(5),(6).Thedefendantspotentialforrehabilitation, |*%) orlackthereof,shouldbeexaminedwhendeterminingwhetheranalternativesentenceis  appropriate.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-103(5).     Thepresumptionforalternativesentencingcanberebutted,andifitis,atrialcourtmay t imposeasentenceofconfinement.Whenimposingasentenceoftotalconfinement,thetrialcourt ` shouldbaseitsdecisionontheconsiderationslistedinTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection L  40-35-103(1): 8  $, XX$ X X8 4 0` 44 4 (A)Confinementisnecessarytoprotectsocietybyrestrainingadefendant $ t whohasalonghistoryofcriminalconduct; `` `  8 4 0` 44 4 (B)Confinementisnecessarytoavoiddepreciatingtheseriousnessofthe  L  offenseorconfinementisparticularlysuitedtoprovideaneffective  8  deterrencetootherslikelytocommitsimilaroffenses;or$ ` `  Ѐ8 4 0` 44 4 (C)Measureslessrestrictivethanconfinementhavefrequentlyorrecently   beenappliedunsuccessfullytothedefendant. ` `  ( X, XK!( Xo! X}!  Defendantarguesthatthetrialcourtshouldhaveallowedhimtoservehissentenceon   CommunityCorrections.TheTennesseeCommunityCorrectionsActwasdevelopedto punish p selected,nonviolentfelonyoffendersinfront-endcommunitybasedalternativestoincarceration, \ therebyreservingsecureconfinementfacilitiesforviolentfelonyoffenders.Tenn.CodeAnn. H 40-36-103(1).Theprogramisavailablefor$, XX$ 4  X X8 4 0` 44 4 (1)Personswho,withoutthisoption,wouldbeincarceratedinacorrectional  p institution; \` `  8 4 0` 44 4 (2)Personswhoareconvictedofproperty-related,ordrug/alcohol-related H felonyoffensesorotherfelonyoffensesnotinvolvingcrimesagainstthe 4 person...; ` `  Ѐ8 4 (3)Personswhoareconvictedofnonviolentfelonyoffenses; 44 8 4 0` 44 4 (4)Personswhoareconvictedoffelonyoffensesinwhichtheuseor  possessionofaweaponwasnotinvolved;` `  8 4 0` 44 4 (5)Personswhodonotdemonstrateapresentorpastpatternofbehavior  indicatingviolence;[and]l` `   4 0 ` 4 (6)Personswhodonotdemonstrateapatternofcommittingviolentoffenses.. X  ..D!` `  ( X, X&( X' X'ӀId.40-36-106(a)(1)-(6).Thosewhoaresentencedtoincarcerationorareonescapeatthetimeof 0"  sentencingarenoteligiblefortheprogram.Id.40-36-106(a)(6). #l!   Initially,wenotethatalthoughdefendantisnotentitledtothepresumptionofalternative $D # sentencingbecauseheisaRangeIIoffender,hequalifiesforsentencingintheCommunity %0!$ CorrectionsProgramduetothenonviolentnatureofhisoffenses.However,wenotethatheisnot &"% automaticallyentitledtothisrelief.Statev.Ball,973S.W.2d288,294(Tenn.Crim.App.1998); '#& Statev.Taylor,744S.W.2d919,922(Tenn.Crim.App.1987).Thestatutesimplysetsforth (#' minimumstandardstoguideatrialcourtwhendeterminingifaparticulardefendantiseligibletobe )$( placedontheCommunityCorrectionsProgram.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-36-106(d). |*%)  h+&*   Defendantcontendsthatheis entitledtoaCommunityCorrectionssentencebecause(1)  heneedstosupporthischildandstepchildren,(2)hispreviouscrimesare definitelynonviolentin  nature,and(3)sohecanreceivemedicaltreatmentforburnsonhislegsthathereceivedwhena  chainsawhewasoperatingexploded. t   TherecordbeforethisCourtshowsthatdefendanthasbeenconvictedonninedifferent L  occasionsforcrimesincludingdrivingonarevokedlicense,twocountsoftheftofpropertyover 8  $1,000,possessionofdrugs,twocountsofvandalismupto$500,DUI,andaggravatedburglary,as $ t wellasatrafficoffense.WeagreewiththeStatethatdefendanthasanextensivecriminalhistory.  `   Further,measureslessrestrictivethanconfinementhaveprovenfruitlesswiththisdefendant.  8  WhileservingpartofhissentenceonprobationinFebruaryof2000fortheftofproperty,defendant $  pledguiltytoaviolationoftheopencontainerlaw.Defendantalsopledguiltytovandalismwhile   awaitingtrialonaDUIchargeevenwhileservingtimeinacountyjail,whichindicatesthathehas   failedtoactappropriatelywhileconfined.Defendantwasarrestedforpossessionofdrugswhileon   suspendedsentenceforhisDUIconviction.Hewasalsoconvictedofdrivingonarevokedlicense.   Defendanthasdemonstratedanunwillingnesstocomplywithmeasureslessrestrictivethan p confinement. \   Thetrialcourtfounddefendanttohavelittlepotentialforrehabilitation.Thecourtnotedthat 4 defendantwillfullyfailedtopaythecourtorderedfeesfordefendantscourtappointedtrialcounsel  p andinstead,purchasedanewcar.Thecourtalsonotedthatdefendantandhisexwifeappearedto  \ haveperpetratedafraudupontheChanceryCourtofBedfordCountyinobtainingtheirdivorceby H representingthatdefendantlivedinBedfordCountywheniffacthedidnot.Lackofcandorand 4 credibilityarereliableindicationsofadefendantspotentialforrehabilitation.Statev.Bunch,646   S.W.2d158,160(Tenn.1983);Statev.Zeolia,928S.W.2d457,463(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);State   v.Williamson,919S.W.2d69,84(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);Statev.Dowdy,894S.W.2d301,  305-06(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).Thetrialjudgeisinthebestpositiontoassessadefendants  credibilityandpotentialforrehabilitation.Statev.Nunley,22S.W.3d282,289(Tenn.Crim.App.  1999).Weseenoneedtodisturbthetrialcourtsfinding. l   Finally,thetrialcourtordereddefendanttoconfinementinordertoavoiddepreciatingthe D! seriousnessoftheoffense.InStatev.Hartley,818S.W.2d370(Tenn.Crim.App.1991),thisCourt 0"  concludedthatanalternativesentenceshouldbedeniedbaseduponthecircumstancesoftheoffense, #l! onlywhenthenatureoftheoffenseissoegregiousthatitoutweighsanyfavorablefactors.We $X" cannotsaythattheftofpropertyfromWalMartqualifiesassuchanoffense.SeeStatev.Harmon, $D # No.#XXQ #NNXQXNE2001#NXNXQ>#NXQXN01506#NXNXQ@?#NXQXNCCA#NXNXQ?#NXQXNR3#NXNXQ?#NXQXNCD,2002Tenn.Crim.App.LEXIS439(Tenn.Crim.App.,filedMay %0!$ 14,2002,atKnoxville).#NXNXQ@##N>#XQXHowever,inlightoftheremainingfactorspointinginfavorof &"% incarceration,applicationofthisfactor,thoughinerror,washarmless. '#&   #XXQ@#XQXԹ  CONCLUSION 0 @  )$(     Accordingly,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. h+&* Ї   `     h     ___________________________________ `    `     h     JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE