WPC  "-ü7[tMee7RwcudUhQҠm/ޑm#c:E]^WW]N:k a؅h ;+:d(y$MxzXHѲZ[5NG}>ʳ\Q-='9g_ !gHx=c|!>ԝ,a*zՊâR[mkKbF;Cl[Hfg+PM/@a( mz&To&bai.Ձ7OOU_[\GAۆ6rwԵK}J]Wd$<D5uS1xR} j!Se%%Q癘U_yuLRw{F=å RLN0R_MQƒi~wnW#U N % 0: ^  w% 4) = L mN "e b : E B HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS., rS1 h_B0:i+003|xU Timberlake- - 0#Xd#   d !USUS.,  _  —XX@hhּINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE # #XyX—I#@7@XXy ROBERTK.HOLLOWAYv.STATEOFTENNESSEE #XyX7@8#Ԉ / 7@XXy#XyX7@#@H H  DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforDicksonCounty  P @] ] No.CR5515RobertE.Burch,Judge  : @*AV) ` dE< ` A߈    @ No.M200302274CCAR3COFiledOctober15,_2004_Ԉ   AV) ` dE<t` A  u    ThismatterwaspresentedtotheCourtuponthemotionoftheStateofTennessee,pursuanttoRule V  20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppealsofTennessee,forthisCourttoaffirmthejudgmentof ? thetrialcourtbymemorandumopinion.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. (x @RR Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourt J @ppAffirmedPursuanttoRule20oftheTennesseeCourtofCriminalAppeals. 4  ThomasT.Woodall,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.WellesandJerry  L.Smith,JJ.,joined.  RobertK.Holloway,Clifton,Tennessee,prose. r PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;ElizabethB.Marney,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; D andDanM.Alsobrooks,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. -} @! MEMORANDUMOPINION  O   Petitioner,RobertK.Holloway,wasconvictedofseconddegreemurderfollowingajurytrial !"! intheDicksonCountyCircuitCourt.Theconvictionwasultimatelyaffirmedonappealtothis " " Court.Statev.Holloway,No.M200201904CCAR3CD,2003WL22142497(Tenn.Crim.App. ## atNashvilleSept.7,2003),perm.toappealdenied(Tenn.Dec.22,2003).Priortothefilingofthe $$ opinioninthisCourtaffirmingtheconviction,Petitionerfiledapetitionforwritoferrorcoramnobis v% % intheCircuitCourtofDicksonCountyonMarch7,2003.Thetrialcourtdismissedthepetition _&!& withoutanevidentiaryhearingbeingheld,onAugust13,2003.Inthisorder,thetrialcourtcorrectly H'"' summarizedtheallegationsofthepetitionforwritoferrorcoramnobisasfollows: 1(#(   (1)Sheriffsdepartmentincidentreportsconcerningfactsofthecrimewereknownto *S%* counsel,butunknowntoPetitioneruntiljustbeforethehearingforthemotionfornewtrial. *<&+ Petitionerallegedthattheseincidentreportswereexculpatory; +%',   ,(- ּ 8yXXdd8      (2)AtapedinterviewofthepetitionerwithaTBIagentandasheriffsdetectivecontained   exculpatoryevidence,andcounselknewoftheexistenceofthetapepriortotrial,butdidnot  introduceitattrial,overPetitionersobjection;    (3)Petitionergavehistrialcounselnamesofwitnesseswhohadknowledgeofthefactsof T thecase,butcounseldidnotinterviewnorcallallofthewitnessestotestifyattrial;and =    (4)TheforensicpathologistwhotestifiedatthetrialonbehalfoftheStatewasunder  _ investigationfor dubiousethicalpractices,andafterPetitionersconvictionforseconddegree  H murder,theforensicpathologistwasalsoconvictedofamisdemeanor.  1    Thetrialcourtconcludedthat,evenifallfactsallegedinthepetitionweretakenastrue,   reliefinthenatureofapetitionforwritoferrorcoramnobiswasnotproper.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.   4026105(2004).Afterfullyreviewingtherecord,weagree.Whiletheallegationscontained   inthepetitionforwritoferrorcoramnobismightbeproperlypresentedinatimelyfiledpetitionfor n  postconvictionrelief,theyarenotproperforconsiderationinapetitionforerrorcoramnobis. W  Therefore,thetrialcourtdidnotcommiterrorbysummarilydismissingthepetition. @   Thejudgmentwasrenderedinthismatterinaproceedingbeforethetrialcourtwithouta b jury,andthejudgmentwasnotadeterminationofguilt,andtheevidencedoesnotpreponderate K againstthefindingofthetrialcourt. 4   Uponreviewofthismatter,thisCourtconcludesthatnoerroroflawrequiringareversalof  thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisapparentontherecord.  @GG% CONCLUSION  q   Accordingly,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. D    `     h   _________________________________________ O    `     h   THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGE