ÿWPC Ÿ‹5tô ]Áu¨hƒ©bàÓŒhÔê}… ?N½ž¯øÈ Ài$0Uθ3%öµ›#óÄ?¾iVÎ;;åµ w%üi&OmfXìH‡{8µçk JD ñØhÆÖ†rMãù„†š•  =/È á–Õ:ÒIÌHôAGM~Ý ¥ C_5Íwè‘ ~o¹ûR‰“P¢óÊGtÙMò¡«[V‘”srq|¿Š ÷â—ÄMö£Ûc™auš‡už÷‰Íî?^N¹ü;CÍÐã¦þÿ|Pýo¿‚à¾á(d7ÄŽqoùQø¦À#Ñsãúz•!eÝ"&€F³}‚“v`pkp)¡»ôzé½yà:ƒ’½ÿ’@µÈð]Fp˜ \Uûcìæ%í;ûž-f£ÞÖká"0Žm«KtóÛU½5†¥¨ã»äKÎ/“¶·ó¿E—òò¦¸?qùÕ€ gøãXRšq¯Ÿ~x"FBUµÀ%wsM{rnuSÈpÏZQ9UNȺ‡ê¬Æ6œªd*¢’ÑE1?„ñ±ñe¿€·B ‡ëOÔÅ馤«–—}!Á£g›¤ž&E ݇—²ÇV_úd8È$ÄÝŶp1€ÀùàÁ#ì_Šÿ§ÐÑ€¶ñ²Tb %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ UN‘ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ11N÷÷÷Eùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùbûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûû 0ë Bîî 0¤  D3¯ D-â 0K ASZÆ­ 0¤s 0D A«[»[µv) (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularÖJ~'bk2È;ž3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2w$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô{„ò»»Ô d(|3Îs$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Îs$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ »»»ÔÑ8€wXXdæ»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î%3 ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼ »îî%3 #ԈРР ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€July€19,€2000Ð ð@ ÐÔ‡XwX»¼ ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ »XXw#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€CHRISTINA€L.€HOWARDÔ‡XwX»¼ Ôó óÐ ä4 ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Williamson€CountyÐ Ø ( Ðà@@øøìàNo.€I„498„139„C€€€€€€Henry€D.€Bell,€JudgeÐ ¾  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<o` AßÐ pÀ  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M1999„02473„CCA„R3„CD€„Filed€November€22,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ eµ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<0` AßÐ 1  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓDefendant€Christina€L.€Howard€was€found€guilty€by€a€Williamson€County€jury€of€possession€withÐ &v  Ðintent€to€sell€or€deliver€cocaine€in€an€amount€greater€than€300€gramsÔ#†¼ »XXw#ÔÔ‡XwX»¼ Ô,Ô#†¼ »XXwž#ÔÔ‡XwX»¼ Ô€possession€with€intent€to€sellÐ  \ Ðor€deliver€marijuana,€and€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trialÐ òB Ðcourt€sentenced€Defendant€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender€to€concurrent€terms€of€twenty€years€forÐ Ø( Ðcocaine€possession,€one€year€for€marijuana€possession,€and€one€day€for€possession€of€drugÐ ¾ Ðparaphernalia.€€Defendant€raises€the€following€issues€in€this€appeal:€(1)€whether€the€trial€court€erredÐ ¤ô Ðwhen€it€did€not€instruct€the€jury€on€the€lesser„included€offense€of€facilitation€of€a€felony;€(2)€whetherÐ ŠÚ Ðthe€trial€court€erred€when€it€sentenced€Defendant€as€a€standard€offender;€and€(3)€whether€the€trialÐ pÀ Ðcourt€erred€when€it€denied€Defendant€alternative€sentencing.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€isÐ V¦ Ðaffirmed.Ð <Œ ÐÓ¸ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€RightÔ#†¼ »XXwá#ÔÔ‡XwX»¼ Ô;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó ó.Ð X ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ »àXwï #ÔÔ‡XwX.¼ ÔThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.,óó€andÐ Ô$ ÐòòNorma€McGee€Ogle,€J.óó,€joined.Ð º  ÐÌEugene€J.€Ô_ÔHoneaÔ_Ô,€Franklin,€Tennessee€(at€trial),€and€Jesse€N.€H.€Bacon,€Madison,€Tennessee€(onÐ † Ö  Ðappeal),€for€the€appellant,€Christina€L.€Howard.Ð l!¼! ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€David€H.€Ô_ÔFindleyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð 8#ˆ# ÐDerek€Smith,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð $n$ ÐÓS ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ »XXw‚ #ÔÔ‡XwX»¼ ÔÐ ê%:!& ÐòòóóÔ#†¼ »XXw› #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XwX»¼ ÔÌà  àDefendant€Christina€L.€Howard€was€convicted€by€a€jury€in€the€Williamson€County€CircuitÐ ¶'#( ÐCourt€for€the€following€offenses:€one€count€of€possession€with€intent€to€sell€or€deliver€300€grams€orÐ œ(ì#) Ðmore€of€cocaine,€a€Class€A€felony;€one€count€of€possession€with€intent€to€sell€or€deliver€ðð€ounce€orÐ ‚)Ò$* Ðmore€of€marijuana,€a€Class€E€felony;€and€one€count€of€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia,€a€Class€AÐ h*¸%+ Ðmisdemeanor.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€sentenced€Defendant€as€a€Range€I€standardÐ N+ž&, Ðoffender€to€concurrent€terms€of€twenty€years€for€cocaine€possession,€one€year€for€marijuanaÐ 4,„'- Ðpossession,€and€one€day€for€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia.€€Ð -j(.ý ÐÔ_Ô‡à  àDefendant€was€a€passenger€in€a€vehicle€which€was€stopped€by€a€state€trooper€for€speeding.€Ð ° ÐAfter€a€search€of€the€vehicle€turned€up€large€quantities€of€cocaine€and€marijuana,€Defendant€wasÐ –æ Ðarrested€along€with€two€co„defendants:€James€Jackson,€who€was€also€convicted€for€possession€withÐ |Ì Ðintent€to€sell€or€deliver€300€grams€or€more€of€cocaine,€and€Jamarcus€King,€whose€charges€were€laterÐ b² Ðdismissed.€€Defendant€was€tried€separately€from€her€co„defendants€because€she€did€not€appear€inÐ H˜ Ðcourt€on€her€initial€trial€date.€€Defendant€failed€to€file€a€motion€for€new€trial€but€raises€the€followingÐ . ~ Ðissues€on€appeal:€(1)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€did€not€instruct€the€jury€on€the€lesser„Ð  d Ðincluded€offense€of€facilitation€of€a€felony;€(2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€sentencedÐ ú J ÐDefendant€as€a€standard€offender;€and€(3)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€denied€DefendantÐ à 0 Ðcommunity„based€alternative€sentencing.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð Æ   ÐÌà@HH&ìàI.€€FACTSˆÐ ’â  ÐÌà  àTennessee€State€Trooper€Michael€Sprawling€testified€that€he€was€on€duty€and€assigned€toÐ ^®  ÐWilliamson€County€on€the€date€Defendant€was€arrested.€€Sprawling€stopped€the€vehicle€containingÐ D”  ÐDefendant€and€the€two€co„defendants€for€traveling€eighty„five€m.p.h.€in€a€sixty„five€m.p.h.€zone.€€Co„Ð *z  Ðdefendant€Jackson€was€driving€the€car€with€Defendant€located€in€the€front€passenger€seat.€€SprawlingÐ ` Ðfirst€questioned€Jackson€about€the€reason€for€their€trip.€€Jackson€replied€that€he€was€traveling€toÐ öF ÐAlabama€to€visit€his€sick€grandfather€and€that€Defendant€was€his€girlfriend.€€When€Sprawling€askedÐ Ü, ÐJackson€whether€there€were€weapons,€drugs,€or€currency€in€the€car,€Jackson€answered€in€the€negativeÐ Â Ðand€gave€Sprawling€permission€to€search€the€vehicle.€€Shortly€thereafter,€Jackson€confessed€that€heÐ ¨ø Ðhad€a€9„mm€firearm€under€the€driverððs€seat.€€He€retrieved€it€for€Sprawling€who€called€for€backup.€Ð ŽÞ ÐUpon€further€search,€the€officers€discovered€$€1645.00€in€cash€on€Jacksonððs€person,€a€small€amountÐ tÄ Ðof€marijuana€in€Defendantððs€pocket,€a€large€amount€of€cocaine€and€marijuana€wrapped€in€clothingÐ Zª Ðinside€Defendantððs€suitcase,€and€an€electronic€scale.€€Defendant€denied€all€knowledge€regarding€theÐ @ Ðdrugs€in€her€suitcase.€€The€suitcases€belonging€to€the€co„defendants€were€searched€also€but€theyÐ &v Ðcontained€no€drugs€or€paraphernalia.Ð  \ ÐÌà  àCharles€Kirby,€an€officer€with€the€Franklin€Police€Department,€testified€that€he€respondedÐ Ø( Ðto€Sprawlingððs€call€for€backup€assistance.€€Kirby€discovered€a€large€amount€of€cocaine€and€marijuanaÐ ¾ Ðrolled€up€in€a€pair€of€jeans€located€in€a€brown€suitcase.€€The€suitcase€also€contained€womenððsÐ ¤ô Ðclothing.€€A€search€of€the€remaining€luggage€belonging€to€the€co„defendants€revealed€only€menððsÐ Š Ú Ðclothing.Ð p!À  ÐÌà  àGlenn€Everett,€a€forensic€expert€who€works€in€the€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation€CrimeÐ <#Œ" ÐLab,€testified€that€he€performed€the€laboratory€tests€on€the€substances€seized€from€the€DefendantððsÐ "$r# Ðsuitcase.€€The€evidence€contained€25.3€grams€of€cocaine€and€293.7€grams€of€cocaine€base€(ð ðcrackÐ %X $ Ðcocaineðð);€the€marijuana€weighed€a€total€of€222€grams.Ð î%>!% ÐÌà  àChristina€Howard,€the€defendant,€testified€that€she€was€merely€traveling€with€her€boyfriend,Ð º' #' ÐJackson,€to€Alabama€when€Trooper€Sprawling€stopped€them.€€Jacksonððs€grandfather€was€ill,€soÐ  (ð#( ÐDefendant€was€accompanying€him€to€Alabama€and€planned€to€visit€her€mother€in€St.€LouisÐ †)Ö$) Ðafterward.€€Defendant€claimed€that€she€lived€with€Jackson€and€that€she€packed€the€suitcases€for€bothÐ l*¼%* Ðof€them€on€the€evening€prior€to€their€departure.€€She€stated€that€Jackson€placed€the€suitcases€in€theÐ R+¢&+ Ðcar,€however,€and€that€he€also€had€access€to€them€in€the€hours€before€they€left.€€Defendant€deniedÐ 8,ˆ', Ðknowledge€regarding€the€ownership€of€the€drugs€that€were€wrapped€in€her€clothing,€but€claimed€thatÐ ° ÐJackson€gave€her€the€marijuana€discovered€in€her€pocket.€€Ð –æ ÐÌà  àDefendant€testified€that€she€had€worked€for€only€three€months€during€the€last€year€and€thatÐ b² ÐJackson€supported€Defendant€financially.€€Jackson€worked€sporadically,€but€he€always€had€moneyÐ H˜ Ðand€told€Defendant€not€to€be€concerned.€€Defendant€testified€that€although€she€considered€thisÐ . ~ Ðsituation€strange,€she€stopped€questioning€Jackson€regarding€money€matters€because€this€wouldÐ  d Ðcause€him€to€become€violent.Ð ú J ÐÌà  àDefendant€claimed€that€Jackson€was€the€reason€Defendant€missed€her€trial€date.€€DefendantððsÐ Æ   Ðbail€was€reduced€from€one€hundred€thousand€dollars€to€ten€thousand€dollars€on€her€promise€toÐ ¬ ü  Ðappear,€yet€Defendant€missed€her€trial€because€she€did€not€have€a€ride€to€court.€€Jackson€had€drivenÐ ’â  ÐDefendant€to€all€prior€court€appearances.€€On€the€eve€of€the€trial,€however,€Jackson€told€DefendantÐ xÈ  Ðthat€he€would€not€pay€for€her€lawyer€nor€drive€her€to€trial€because€the€drugs€were€hers.€€Jackson€alsoÐ ^®  Ðthreatened€her€life,€i.e.,€if€Defendant€testified€that€the€drugs€were€his€he€would€kill€her.€€DefendantÐ D”  Ðconsequently€missed€her€trial€but€was€located€by€the€bail€bondsman€a€few€months€later.Ð *z  ЀÌà  àJames€Jackson,€the€co„defendant€and€driver€of€the€car,€testified€in€rebuttal€that€the€DefendantÐ öF Ðwas€not€his€girlfriend€and€that€they€never€lived€together.€€Instead,€Jackson€said€that€he€lived€with€hisÐ Ü, Ðparents€and€that€he€packed€his€own€suitcase€before€he€left€with€Defendant€on€their€trip.€€JacksonÐ Â Ðtestified€that€he€has€always€been€employed€and€that€he€keeps€a€gun€in€his€car€for€general€protectionÐ ¨ø Ðonly.€€Jackson€was€on€his€way€to€visit€his€sick€grandfather€when€Sprawling€stopped€them.€€TheÐ ŽÞ Ðmoney€Jackson€was€carrying€was€given€to€him€by€his€mother€to€pay€his€grandfatherððs€bills.€€JacksonÐ tÄ Ðfurther€testified€that€he€drove€Defendant€to€only€one€court€appearance€and€that€he€did€not€threatenÐ Zª Ðher€life.€Ð @ ÐÌà@w w ìàII.€€INSTRUCTION€ON€LESSER„INCLUDED€OFFENSESˆÐ  \ ÐÌà  àDefendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€failed€to€instruct€the€jury€on€facilitationÐ Ø( Ðof€cocaine€possession€with€intent€to€sell€or€deliver€as€a€lesser„included€offense.€€Although€the€trialÐ ¾ Ðcourt€instructed€the€jury€on€the€lesser„included€offense€of€simple€possession,€Defendant€argues€that€Ð ¤ô Ðomitting€an€instruction€on€facilitation€deprived€Defendant€of€her€constitutional€right€to€trial€by€jury.€Ð Š Ú ÐWe€disagree.Ð p!À  ÐÌà  àFirst,€we€note€that€Defendant€failed€to€file€a€motion€for€a€new€trial.€€In€Tennessee,€no€issueÐ <#Œ" Ðpresented€for€review€subsequent€to€a€jury€trial€may€be€predicated€on€actions€committed€or€occurringÐ "$r# Ðduring€the€trial,€including€error€in€jury€instructions€granted€or€refused,€unless€the€issue€wasÐ %X $ Ðspecifically€stated€in€a€motion€for€a€new€trial.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(e);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€30(b);Ð î%>!% ÐòòState€v.€Keelóó,€882€S.W.2d€410,€415„16€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€Similarly,€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a)Ð Ô&$"& Ðprovides,€in€pertinent€part,€that€ð ð[n]othing€in€this€rule€shall€be€construed€as€requiring€relief€be€grantedÐ º' #' Ðto€a€party€...€who€failed€to€take€whatever€action€was€reasonably€available€to€prevent€or€nullify€theÐ  (ð#( Ðharmful€effect€of€an€error.ðð€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Reeceóó,€637€S.W.2d€858,€860€(Tenn.€1982).€€Thus,€the€issueÐ †)Ö$) Ðis€waived,€but€even€if€addressed€on€the€merits,€Defendant€would€not€be€entitled€to€relief.Ð l*¼%* Ðâ âÐ R+¢&+ Ðà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40-18-110(a)€provides€that€a€trial€court€must€charge€theÐ ° Ðâ âjury€with€all€lesser-included€offenses€included€in€the€indictment,€without€any€request€on€the€part€ofÐ –æ Ðthe€defendant€to€do€so.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€€ðð€40-18-110(a)€(1997).€€Under€this€provision,€"'a€trialÐ |Ì Ðcourt€must€instruct€the€jury€on€all€lesser-included€offenses€if€the€evidence€at€trial€is€legally€sufficientÐ b² Ðto€support€a€conviction€for€the€lesser€offense.'"€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€453,€464€(Tenn.1999)Ð H˜ Ð(quoting€òòState€v.€Langfordóó,€994€S.W.2d€126,€128€(Tenn.1999)).Ð . ~ ÐÌà  àUnder€part€(c)€of€the€test€recently€set€forth€by€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€in€òòBurnsóó,€anÐ ú J Ðoffense€is€a€lesser€included€offense€of€another€if€it€consists€of€ð ðfacilitation€of€the€offense€charged€orÐ à 0 Ðof€an€offense€that€otherwise€meets€the€definition€of€lesser-included€offense€in€part€(a)€or€(b)....ðð€€òòIdóó.Ð Æ   Ðat€466-67.€€Once€a€particular€offense€is€a€lesser-included€offense€under€the€above€test,€the€nextÐ ¬ ü  Ðinquiry€is€whether€the€evidence€justifies€a€jury€instruction€on€such€lesser€offense.€€òòIdóó.€at€467.€€ThisÐ ’â  Ðinquiry€has€two€parts.€€First,€the€trial€court€must€determine€ð ðwhether€any€evidence€exists€thatÐ xÈ  Ðreasonable€minds€could€accept€as€to€the€lesser-included€offense.ðð€€òòIdóó.€at€469.€€In€making€thisÐ ^®  Ðdetermination,€the€trial€court€must€view€the€evidence€ð ðin€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€existenceÐ D”  Ðof€the€lesser-included€offense€without€making€any€judgments€on€the€credibility€of€such€evidence.ðð€Ð *z  ÐòòIdóó.€€Secondly,€the€trial€court€ð ðmust€determine€if€the€evidence,€viewed€in€this€light,€is€legallyÐ ` Ðsufficient€to€support€a€conviction€for€the€lesser-included€offense.ðð€€òòIdóó.€€Even€where€€evidenceÐ öF Ðsurvives€these€challenges€on€appeal€and€error€is€found,€this€Court€must€still€find€that€the€erroneousÐ Ü, Ðfailure€to€instruct€on€a€lesser„included€offense€was€not€harmless€in€order€for€a€defendant€to€prevail.Ð Â ÐÌà  àWe€find€that€part€(c)€of€the€above€definition€of€lesser„included€offenses€is€determinative€forÐ ŽÞ Ðthe€issue€whether€facilitation€is€a€lesser„included€offense€in€this€case.€€Facilitation€of€an€offense€is,Ð tÄ Ðas€a€matter€of€law,€a€lesser„included€offense€of€the€offense€charged.€€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€464.€Ð Zª ÐÌà  àWe€examine€the€facts€to€determine€whether€there€is€any€evidence€that€reasonable€minds€couldÐ &v Ðaccept€to€support€facilitation€of€the€offense.€€We€do€this€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€existenceÐ  \ Ðof€the€lesser„included€offense€and€without€any€judgment€regarding€the€credibility€of€such€evidence.€Ð òB ÐA€person€ð ðis€criminally€responsible€for€the€facilitation€of€a€felony€if,€knowing€that€another€intendsÐ Ø( Ðto€commit€a€specific€felony,€but€without€the€intent€required€for€criminal€responsibility€under€ðð€39„11„Ð ¾ Ð402(2),€the€person€knowingly€furnishes€substantial€assistance€in€the€commission€of€the€felony.ðð€Ð ¤ô ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„403(a)€(1997).€€After€reviewing€the€record,€we€find€no€evidence€to€supportÐ Š Ú Ða€charge€of€facilitation.Ð p!À  ÐÌà  àClearly,€the€mens€rea€required€for€commission€of€the€offense€of€facilitation€is€òòknowingóó;€itÐ <#Œ" Ðappears€twice€in€the€statute.€€First,€the€defendant€must€know€that€another€person€intends€to€commitÐ "$r# Ða€specific€felony.€€òòIdóó.€€In€the€instant€case,€however,€Defendant€adamantly€denied€all€knowledge€ofÐ %X $ Ðthe€drugsðð€existence€as€well€as€all€knowledge€of€any€intent€on€the€part€of€the€co„defendants€to€engageÐ î%>!% Ðin€drug€trafficking.€€Secondly,€the€statute€requires€that€the€facilitator€knowingly€furnish€substantialÐ Ô&$"& Ðassistance.€€òòIdóó.€€There€is€no€evidence€whatsoever€in€the€record€that€Defendant€ð ðsubstantially€òòassistedóóððÐ º' #' Ðanyone€in€the€commission€of€the€offense.€Ð  (ð#( ÐÌà  àòòóóAs€in€the€case€of€òòState€v.€Fowleróó,€23€S.W.3d€285€(Tenn.€2000),€the€evidence€here€reveals€onlyÐ l*¼%* Ðtwo€possible€scenarios:€criminal€responsibility€for€the€instant€offense€or€an€acquittal.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€at€289.€Ð R+¢&+ ÐIn€òòFowleróó,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€criminal€activity€but€argued€at€trial€that€he€was€not€criminallyÐ 8,ˆ', Ðresponsible€for€the€offenses€committed€by€a€co„defendant€because€he€lacked€intent.€€FowlerÐ ° Ðmaintained€that€the€trial€court€should€have€instructed€the€jury€on€facilitation€as€a€lesser„includedÐ –æ Ðoffense.€€During€the€trial,€however,€Fowler€did€not€contend€he€was€guilty€of€facilitation,€did€not€showÐ |Ì Ðevidence€of€substantial€assistance€so€as€to€raise€the€issue€of€facilitation€and€did€not€requestÐ b² Ðinstruction€on€facilitation.€€òòIdóó.€€Likewise,€the€record€in€Defendantððs€case€shows€similar€omissionsÐ H˜ Ðand€ð ðall€or€nothingðð€evidence.€€Two€scenarios€are€possible:€Defendant€packed€the€drugs€in€her€bagÐ . ~ Ðfor€sale€or€delivery,€or€she€was€completely€ignorant€of€the€fact€that€a€crime€was€being€committed.€Ð  d ÐAccordingly,€an€instruction€on€facilitation€of€a€felony€was€not€appropriate.Ð ú J ÐÌà  àIn€sum,€we€conclude€that€when€the€evidence€in€the€record€regarding€whether€DefendantÐ Æ   Ðcommitted€facilitation€of€the€felony€in€issue€is€viewed€liberally€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€theÐ ¬ ü  Ðexistence€of€the€lesser„included€offense,€it€reveals€nothing€that€would€cause€reasonable€minds€toÐ ’â  Ðconclude€that€Defendant€committed€the€crime.€€Hence,€an€instruction€to€the€jury€on€facilitation€wasÐ xÈ  Ðnot€appropriate.€Ð ^®  ÐÌà@ËË"ìàIII.€€SENTENCINGˆÐ *z  ÐÌà  àDefendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€failed€to€sentence€her€as€an€especiallyÐ öF Ðmitigated€offender€and,€again,€when€it€denied€her€request€to€be€sentenced€pursuant€to€the€CommunityÐ Ü, ÐCorrections€Act€of€1985.Ð Â ÐÌà  àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€the€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€thisÐ ŽÞ ÐCourt€conducts€a€de€novo€review€of€the€sentence€with€a€presumption€that€the€determinations€madeÐ tÄ Ðby€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€€ðð€40-35-401(d)€(1997).€This€presumption€isÐ Zª Ðð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÐ @ Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð &v Ð1991).€€Because€the€record€in€this€case€indicates€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÐ  \ Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances,€our€review€is€de€novo€with€a€presumption€ofÐ òB Ðcorrectness.Ð Ø( ÐÌà  àIn€conducting€a€de€novo€review€of€a€sentence,€this€Court€must€consider€the€evidence€receivedÐ ¤ô Ðat€trial€and€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€presentence€report,€the€principles€of€sentencing€and€argumentsÐ Š Ú Ðas€to€sentencing€alternatives,€the€statutory€enhancing€and€mitigating€factors,€arguments€of€counsel,Ð p!À  Ðany€statement€that€defendant€made€on€her€own€behalf,€the€nature€and€character€of€the€criminalÐ V"¦! Ðconduct€involved,€and€the€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ <#Œ" ÐAnn.€€ðððð€40-35-102,€103,€210€(1997€&€Supp.1999);€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169;€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€735Ð "$r# ÐS.W.2d€859,€863€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€Defendant€has€the€burden€of€demonstrating€that€theÐ %X $ Ðsentence€is€improper.€€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169Ô‡ XwXXXwÔ.Ô#†XwXX XwrT#Ô€€Ð î%>!% ÐÌà  àIf€our€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedures,Ð º' #' Ðimposed€a€lawful€sentence€after€having€given€due€consideration€and€proper€weight€to€the€factors€andÐ  (ð#( Ðprinciples€set€out€under€the€sentencing€law,€and€made€findings€of€fact€that€are€adequately€supportedÐ †)Ö$) Ðby€the€record,€then€we€may€not€modify€the€sentence€even€if€we€would€have€preferred€a€differentÐ l*¼%* Ðresult.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Ð R+¢&+ ÐÐ 8,ˆ', Ðà  àA.€€Sentencing€as€an€Especially€Mitigated€OffenderÐ ° ÐÌà  àThe€record€indicates€that€in€determining€the€length€of€Defendantððs€sentences,€the€trial€courtÐ |Ì Ðfound€that€no€mitigating€factors€and€no€enhancement€factors€applied.€€Defendant€contends€that€theÐ b² Ðtrial€court€erred€when€it€refused€to€apply€mitigating€factors€and€thus,€caused€Defendant€to€beÐ H˜ Ðineligible€for€sentencing€as€an€especially€mitigated€offender€according€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð . ~ Ð109€(1997).€€Specifically,€Defendant€challenges€the€trial€courtððs€refusal€to€apply€the€followingÐ  d Ðmitigation€factors:€(4)€the€defendant€played€a€minor€role€in€the€commission€of€the€offense;€(6)€theÐ ú J Ðdefendant,€because€of€youth€or€old€age,€lacked€substantial€judgment€in€committing€the€offense;€(11)Ð à 0 Ðthe€defendant,€although€guilty€of€the€crime,€committed€the€offense€under€such€unusual€circumstancesÐ Æ   Ðthat€it€is€unlikely€that€a€sustained€intent€to€violate€the€law€motivated€the€criminal€conduct;€and€(12)Ð ¬ ü  Ðthe€defendant€acted€under€duress€or€under€the€domination€of€another€person,€even€though€the€duressÐ ’â  Ðor€domination€was€not€sufficient€to€constitute€a€defense.€€See€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„113(4),€(6),Ð xÈ  Ð(11),€(12)€(1997).€€Ð ^®  ÐÌà  àWe€find€no€evidence€in€the€record€to€support€the€mitigating€factors€cited€above.€€First,€it€isÐ *z  Ðclear€that€Defendant€did€not€play€a€minor€role€in€the€offense€as€required€to€apply€mitigating€factorÐ ` Ð(4).€€Regarding€the€age€of€the€accused,€Defendant€argues€that€because€she€is€a€twenty„year„old€highÐ öF Ðschool€dropout,€she€lacked€sufficient€substantial€judgment€in€committing€the€offense€for€the€trialÐ Ü, Ðcourt€to€apply€factor€(6).€€Our€Supreme€Court€in€òòState€v.€Adamsóó,€864€S.W.2d€31€(Tenn.€1993),€wasÐ Â Ðnot€persuaded€that€a€twenty„year„old€defendant€was€so€young€that€he€lacked€substantial€judgmentÐ ¨ø Ðin€committing€the€offense€charged.€€Neither€are€we,€in€this€case.€€Finally,€mitigating€factors€(11)€andÐ ŽÞ Ð(12)€require€proof€of€unusual€circumstances€and€duress,€respectively.€€We€find€nothing€in€the€recordÐ tÄ Ðwhich€indicates€the€presence€of€either.€€Defendant€failed€to€show€how€Jacksonððs€alleged€temperÐ Zª Ðcaused€her€to€commit€the€crime€under€duress€or€because€of€domination.€€Because€we€find€that€noÐ @ Ðmitigating€factors€apply€under€the€circumstances€before€us,€Defendant€is€not€eligible€to€be€sentencedÐ &v Ðas€an€especially€mitigated€offender€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„109(a)€(1997).€€Ð  \ ÐÌà  àB.€€Sentence€pursuant€to€the€Community€Corrections€ActÐ Ø( ÐÌà  àDefendant€asserts€that€the€trial€court€should€have€ordered€her€sentences€be€served€inÐ ¤ô ÐCommunity€Corrections.€€The€presumption€in€ðð€40„35„102(6),€upon€which€Defendant€predicates€aÐ Š Ú Ðlarge€part€of€her€argument,€requires€that€a€defendant€be€ð ðan€especially€mitigated€or€standard€offenderÐ p!À  Ðconvicted€of€a€Class€C,€D,€or€E€felony€[€]€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencingÐ V"¦! Ðoptions€in€the€absence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6)€(1997).€€SinceÐ <#Œ" ÐDefendant€was€convicted€of€a€Class€A€felony,€there€is€not€a€òòpresumptionóó€that€alternative€sentencingÐ "$r# Ðoptions€are€appropriate.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6)€(1997).€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€891€S.W.2dÐ %X $ Ð922,€929€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994)€(presumption€limited€to€Class€C,€D,€and€E€felonies).€Ð î%>!% ÐÌà  àDefendant€also€argues€that€the€trial€courtððs€sentence€determinations€are€not€in€the€record.€€AsÐ º' #' Ða€result,€Defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€has€lost€its€presumption€of€correctness.€€It€is€true€thatÐ  (ð#( Ðthe€presumption€of€correctness€is€ð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€theÐ †)Ö$) Ðtrial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.Ð l*¼%* ÐAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€When€determining€suitability€for€alternative€sentencing,Ð R+¢&+ Ðthe€sentencing€court€considers€the€following€factors:€(1)€whether€confinement€is€necessary€to€protectÐ 8,ˆ', Ðsociety€by€restraining€a€defendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;€(2)€whetherÐ ° Ðconfinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense;€(3)€whetherÐ –æ Ðconfinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrent€to€others€likely€to€commit€similarÐ |Ì Ðoffenses;€(4)€whether€measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€or€recently€beenÐ b² Ðapplied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant;€and€(5)€whether€the€defendant€has€poor€potential€forÐ H˜ Ðrehabilitation.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)€(1997);€òòState€v.€Housewrightóó,€982€S.W.2d€354,Ð . ~ Ð356ð!ð57€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).Ð  d ÐÌà  àWhile€we€may€agree€that€the€record€is€sparse€with€respect€to€what€specific€facts€the€trial€courtÐ à 0 Ðused€as€grounds€for€denying€community€corrections,€the€record€is€nevertheless€replete€with€factsÐ Æ   Ðwhich€we€find€sufficient€to€support€its€judgment.€€Therefore,€even€if€the€presumption€of€correctnessÐ ¬ ü  Ðdoes€not€attach€to€the€denial€of€Community€Corrections,€we€find€the€trial€court€did€not€err.Ð ’â  ÐÌà  àDecisions€concerning€whether€confinement€is€appropriate€depend€on€various€factors€whichÐ ^®  Ðinclude€the€need€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense€and€to€provide€an€effectiveÐ D”  Ðdeterrence€to€others.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(B)€(1997).€€Defendant€was€convicted€of€twoÐ *z  Ðfelonies€and€arrested€while€transporting€large€quantities€of€cocaine€and€marijuana.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.Ð ` ÐMichael€A€Boylandóó,€No.€02C01„9607„CR„00232,€1997€WL€367679€at€*2,€Shelby€County€(Tenn.Ð öF ÐCrim.€App.,€Jackson,€July€2,€1997)€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1998)€(conviction€of€possessionÐ Ü, Ðfor€sale€of€twenty„six€grams€of€cocaine,€a€Class€B€felony,€justified€denial€of€community€correctionsÐ Â Ðbased€on€need€to€avoid€depreciating€seriousness€of€offense€and€to€serve€as€deterrent).€€She€also€failedÐ ¨ø Ðto€appear€on€her€initial€trial€date.€€This€evidences€a€poor€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€ð ðThat€aÐ ŽÞ Ðdefendant€meets€the€minimum€requirements€of€the€Community€Corrections€Act€.€.€.€does€not€meanÐ tÄ Ðthat€he€is€entitled€to€be€sentenced€under€the€Act€as€a€matter€of€law€or€right.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ballóó,€973Ð Zª ÐS.W.2d€288,€294€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998).€€€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð @ ÐÌÌÌÌÌà@´´#ìàIV.€€CONCLUSIONˆÐ ¤ô ÐÌà  àWe€hold€that€the€trial€court€properly€refused€to€instruct€the€jury€on€facilitation€as€a€lesser„Ð p!À  Ðincluded€offense.€€In€addition,€we€hold€that€the€trial€court€was€correct€when€it€refused€to€applyÐ V"¦! Ðmitigating€factors€in€determining€Defendantððs€sentence€and€that€the€trial€courtððs€refusal€to€order€theÐ <#Œ" Ðsentence€to€be€served€on€Community€Corrections€was€properly€supported€in€the€record.€€TheÐ "$r# Ðjudgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð %X $ Ðà  à€Ð î%>!% ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð º' #' Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÐ  (ð#( Ð.