ÿWPC% bÀQ—%Ó‘xÐܦt"ïŠQ¹ÁÂ9ñ½fxó}=>"¸x:é[¼&àÁ63+½áV27/°U«››ï°õkñ0ÌÉðÆÚ÷Ü ¨vÑш_2ÆNÅ} ëÍgÚ¾à› SÞÙ‘H]÷§rx>*~InË<"Zš«S #`“~Ó)Üw©©Ð€¥¤cOÀS¨y«TŠ?T9]ß 4&€—áôÑë«“‰v [„I÷N}ìâ~¡Ã;ð)xhì ¢R­RîUî¬'´|Þ: vÁQýÙMñ0Tà—2REö½’:ää/œÔ3Œ[G ì¥y¼þ>£Ì}÷ÁîZLê¢Jä½GPçaˆÈQÍj-òv"ÿ~f7%‡4…^~Ñh$23é­Hö”_ƲüQ¶»XÀe4bîdV8°Á-…=8O c^Ë Pxyc¸c\Ñãz.F~lY|×wE²–’¯¼àž½pûKƒQ ha†ŠTü@‚Ë Öbx”æMw´0PÜb5@ÿ-ßwàC-êIäø,·l8#çýÁ­BÃ]ùêö6°G—0‰,Žz”žî²ñÈ'RÝ' ׉ëjá°à-zQN=…åಡ6üü©hSl~Ƥ4` %@^ F 0ÜRU:. wh 4l € N ‘ m“ #!ª U:Ë U: U:? Åy 0!> 0D_£ 0ù«¤Æ»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» AQÆÒ 0ù˜ B‘ 0D®® D3òXF‘l'L (´`$¡¡Ñ°ÑÒ°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€‰GXXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  Ñ, øð AZ‹"Arial Regular”@q' œ3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 8000 Series PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0, øð AZ"Arial Regular, øð AZ"Arial Regular,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular »Ô_ÔÒ°ÒÔ‡ôUÁòXXÔÝ ƒ¶+ÿÝÑ@°ÑÒÒÑT@R[ì AØ'ÿ LegalXà3Ø' Letter  AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ8À—’XXdædæ8ÑÑ @ Ñà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing€is€not€included€in€the€record.€€Thus,€the€specificÐ  Ðterms€of€the€plea€agreement€are€unknown.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing€and€on€appeal€the€appellantРƾ Ðargues€only€his€entitlement€to€total€probation.€€For€these€reasons,€appellate€review€is€limited€to€theÐ „| Ðsentencing€alternative€of€probation.€€(Ñ(3ë$¤¤Ý ƒ`!ÝѰÑÒ°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ8€É‚XXdædæ8ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó (Ñ3au$££Ý ƒ`!ÝѰÑÒ°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ8€É‚XXdædæ8ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ý Ý ƒ[au"ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€è¢%çXXÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€z†çè¢%ÔÐ  ÐÌNovember€12,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAYÔó óLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Z[]_Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(Ñ3au$¢¢Ý ƒ`!ÝѰÑÒ°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ8€É‚XXdædæ8ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ý d($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó\\\\'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ`!ÝѰÑÒ°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ8€É‚XXdædÈ8ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÓ ÔþÓòòò òÔ_Ôßv€Y_@0,j: `€€@ÿE˜Ý Žtt¨¦ÐÜ WvßÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà@. . ®àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ Ü  ÐóóÌòòà@ÓÓ(®àAT€KNOXVILLEˆÐ ´ Ø ÐóóÌà@ÈÈ$®àOCTOBER€SESSION,€1999ˆÌÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À à*Ð (L  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à*à  àNo.€03C01„9901„CC„00011Ð 8  Ðà ` àAppellee,à  àà h àà À à*Ð $  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à*à  àANDERSON€COUNTYÐ ì  Ðvs.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à*Ð Øü  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à*à  àHon.€JAMES€B.€SCOTT,€JR.,€JudgeÐ Äè  ÐDAVID€LEE€HURST,à h à*Ð °Ô  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à*à  à(Sentencing)Ð œÀ Ðà ` àAppellant.à  àà h àà À à*Ð ˆ¬ Ðó óÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellantóó:à  àà h àà À àà  àòòFor€the€Appelleeóó:Ð &J ÐÌò òLeslie€Huntó óà ¸ àà  àò òà0 h àà0ÀhT$hT$àà0ÀT$ÀT$àPaul€G.€Summersó óÐòT$T$ Ð139€North€Main€Streetà h àà0 À àà0ÀT$ÀT$àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÐÞ T$T$ ÐClinton,€TN€€37716à  àÐ Ä!è Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àò òClinton€J.€Morganó óÐ ª"Î Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€Generalà Ð àà (# àÐ –#º Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à2d€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€37243„0493à x àà Ð àà (# àÐ .'R Ðà ` àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àò òJames€N.€Ramseyó óÐ à)" Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àò òJan€Hicksó óÐ ˜,¼!% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à127€Anderson€County€CourthouseÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à100€North€Main€StreetÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àClinton,€TN€€37716ÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ Î3ò(- ÐÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌÌò òDavid€G.€Hayes,ó ó€JudgeÐ 29V.3 ÐÐ  :B/4 ÐÔ_ÔÓÓÔ‡ XqXXXÔà@+®àò òòòOPINIONˆÐ  ÐÌà ` àóóó óThe€appellant,€David€Lee€Hurst,€appeals€the€sentencing€decision€of€theÐ È À ÐAnderson€County€Criminal€Court€following€his€guilty€plea€to€Class€D€felony€childÐ ¨   Ðabuse.€€In€accordance€with€the€plea€agreement,€the€appellant€received€a€two€yearÐ ˆ€ Ðsentence€with€the€determination€of€probation€to€be€submitted€to€the€trial€court.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€AtÐ h`  Ðthe€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€probation€and€ordered€confinement€inÐ H@  Ðthe€Department€of€Correction.€€The€sole€issue€on€appeal€is€whether€the€trial€courtÐ (  Ðerred€by€denying€the€appellant€total€probation.€€Ð  ÐÌà ` àFollowing€review,€we€affirm.Ð ÈÀ ÐÌà@::%®àSENTENCING€HEARINGˆÐ ˆ€ Ðà ` àThe€conviction€stems€from€the€physical€abuse€of€the€appellantððs€five€year€oldÐ h` Ðstepson€in€January€of€1998.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing€in€November€of€1998,Ð H!@ ÐDetective€Penny€Baker€of€the€Anderson€County€Sheriffððs€Department€testified€thatÐ (#  Ðthe€child€exhibited€injuries€to€both€ears,€bruising€on€the€inside€and€outside€of€hisÐ %  Ðears,€ð ðfaintðð€bruises€to€the€side€of€the€face,€numerous€bruises€to€one€arm,€ð ðfaintððÐ è&à" Ðbruising€on€his€back,€an€abrasion€to€his€neck,€a€severe€bruise€to€the€top€of€his€foot,€aÐ È(À!$ Ðbruise€to€the€back€of€the€head,€and€a€severe€bruise€to€his€penis.€€The€presentenceÐ ¨* #& Ðreport€characterized€the€victimððs€injuries€as€being€ð ðbruised€from€his€ears€to€his€toesÐ ˆ,€%( Ðin€various€stages€of€healing.ðð€€The€appellant€explained€to€Baker€that€the€bruising€toÐ h.`'* Ðthe€penis€was€the€result€of€his€kicking€the€child€and€the€rest€were€the€result€ofÐ H0@), Ðð ðplaying€roughðð€with€the€child.€€Detective€Baker€testified€that€the€appellant€initiallyÐ (2 +. Ðwas€untruthful€and€later€changing€his€story,€attempted€ð ðto€make€lightðð€of€the€severityÐ 4-0 Ðof€his€actions.€€The€presentence€report€indicates€that€the€appellant€ð ðbeat€(the€victim)Ð  Ðwith€a€board,€stomped€his€foot,ðð€and€ð ðbeat€him€about€the€head€and€face.ðð€€TheÐ èà Ðappellant€is€six€feet€and€six€inches€tall€and€weighs€two€hundred€pounds;€the€victimÐ È À Ðweighs€forty„six€pounds.€€€Ð ¨   ÐÌà ` à€The€appellant€has€two€prior€felony€convictions€from€1983€when€he€wasÐ h`  Ðnineteen€years€old€for€third€degree€burglary€and€grand€larceny,€both€arising€from€theÐ H@  Ðsame€incident.€€He€received€a€three€year€sentence€for€each€offense€and€was€placedÐ (  Ðon€unsupervised€probation.€€The€appellant€admits€to€recent€marijuana€use.€€TheÐ  Ðprobation€officer€testified€that€in€preparing€the€presentence€report,€he€believed€theÐ èà Ðappellant€purposefully€misadvised€him€that€the€prior€theft€conviction€was€committedÐ ÈÀ Ðas€a€juvenile€when€in€actuality€it€was€an€offense€committed€when€the€appellant€wasÐ ¨  Ðnineteen€years€old.€€Ð ˆ€ ÐÌà ` àThe€thirty„four€year€old€appellant€testified€that€he€was€currently€employed€byÐ H!@ ÐABC€Transport€where€his€duties€involve€moving€and€setting€up€mobile€homes.€€HeÐ (#  Ðexplained€that€he€experiences€disabilities€from€bone€deterioration€in€his€spine€andÐ %  Ðfrom€other€medical€problems.€€He€currently€resides€with€his€mother€while€he€and€hisÐ è&à" Ðwife€are€in€the€process€of€getting€a€divorce.€€Although€he€admitted€to€problemsÐ È(À!$ Ðcontrolling€his€anger,€he€denied€that€any€of€the€childððs€injuries€were€a€result€of€hisÐ ¨* #& Ðanger.€€He€advised€that€he€ð ðhad€no€desire€for€any€mental€health€treatment.ðð€€HeÐ ˆ,€%( Ðexplained€that€he€told€the€probation€officer€that€his€crime€was€committed€as€aÐ h.`'* Ðjuvenile€because€he€could€not€remember€the€dates€and€times€as€a€result€of€a€headÐ H0@), Ðinjury€from€which€he€had€to€learn€to€write€and€read€again.€€On€cross„examination,Ð (2 +. Ðthe€appellant€denied€the€accusation€by€the€child€that€he€hit€him€with€a€board.€€€€Ð 4-0 Ðà ` àÌà ` àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€the€appellantððs€requestÐ È7À04 Ðfor€probation.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð ¨9 26 Їà@``*®àPROBATIONˆÐ  Ðà ` àThe€sole€issue€on€appeal€is€whether€the€trial€court€properly€denied€probation.€€Ð èà Ѐ€€€€Ô#†X—’XX Xqø#ÔAlthough€the€appellant€requests€that€we€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€of€hisÐ È À Ðsentence,€which€requires€an€examination€of€the€ð ðnature€and€characteristics€of€theÐ ¬ ¤ Ðcriminal€conduct€involved,ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(b)(4)€(1997),€we€areÐ xp Ðprecluded€from€doing€so€because€the€record€is€void€of€the€guilty€plea€transcript.€€€WeÐ D<  Ðhave€repeatedly€held€that€failure€to€include€the€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearingsÐ   Ðin€the€record€prohibits€this€court€from€conducting€a€meaningful€òòde€novoóó€review.€€€òòÐ ÜÔ  ÐóóÌà ` àIf€the€appellate€record€is€inadequate,€the€reviewing€court€must€presume€thatÐ xp Ðthe€trial€judge€ruled€correctly.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Ivyóó,€868€S.W.2d€724,€728€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð D< ÐApp.€1993).€€The€obligation€of€preparing€a€complete€and€adequate€record€for€theÐ  Ðissues€presented€on€appeal€rests€upon€the€appealing€party.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.Ð ÜÔ Ð24(b).€€For€this€reason,€this€issue€is€waived.€€Ô‡ XqXXX—’ÔHowever,€we€are€able€to€glean€from€theÐ ¨  Ðrecord€the€nature€and€circumstances€of€the€offense€through€the€testimony€ofÐ Œ „ ÐDetective€Baker€and€the€presentence€report.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð l"d Ð210(b)(1)€and€(2).€€Within€this€limitation,€we€elect€to€address€the€issue.€€€€€€Ð L$D  ÐÌà ` àÔ#†X—’XX Xq¢'#ÔÔ‡ XqXXX—’ÔIn€this€case,€the€trial€court€denied€probation€based€upon€the€circumstances€ofÐ  (!$ Ðthe€offense€and€the€appellantððs€prior€criminal€history:€€€Ð ì)ä"& ÐÓÓà8 ` àHe€[appellant]€was€in€unsupervised€probation€disposition€if€I€rememberÐ Ì+Ä$( Ðcorrectly€before.€€He€has€admitted€to€smoking€marijuana.€€This€was€aÐ ¼,´%) Ðfive„year€old€child.€€Here€we€have€a€person€that€looks€to€be€about€sixÐ ¬-¤&* Ðfoot,€five,€or€somewhere€around€there€that€comes€to€this€courtroom€.€.€.Ð œ.”'+ Ðfully€accountable€for€his€conduct.€€This€is€not€just€one€blow.€.€.€twoÐ Œ/„(, Ðblows.€.€.€[or]€three€blows.€€And€I€.€.€.€feel€like€that€even€though€theÐ |0t)- Ðdefendant€comes€here€and€says€it€wasnððt€out€of€temper,€there€appearsÐ l1d*. Ðto€be€that€if€it€wasnððt€out€of€temper,€such€poor€judgment€I€am€not€sureÐ \2T+/ Ðwe€could€trust€you€out€here€with€other€young€individuals.€€This€childÐ L3D,0 Ðhas€been€not€only€bruised€and€abused,€but€it€will€follow€that€childÐ <44-1 Ðthrough€life.€.€.€.Ð,5$.2` ü!` ü! Ðà8 ` àà ¸ àI€donððt€think€you€are€a€proper€subject€for€probation€based€on€theÐ 6/3 Ðtype€of€crime€committed€here€and€the€past.€€I€find€that€you€are€notÐ  704 Ðsuitable€for€probation.€.€.€.€€Had€you€not€had€all€of€these€problemsÐ ü7ô05 Ðbefore,€you€come€here€the€first€time.€€Had€this€condition€of€this€childÐ ì8ä16 Ðreflected€something€other,€you€say€you€have€maybe€some€lapse€ofÐ Ü9Ô27 Ðmemory.€€Well,€it€may€become€very€convenient€when€it€comes€to€thisÐ  Ðtype€of€conduct.€€I€just€find€that€this€kind€of€conduct€is€reprehensible.€€ItÐ øð Ðshould€be€discouraged€and€not€only€that,€but€you€have€a€past€history€inÐ èà Ðcoming€here€„€both€as€a€juvenile€and€as€an€adult€„€and€you€admittedÐ Ø Ð Ðthat€you€had€been€smoking€marijuana.€€So€for€those€reasons,€the€courtÐ È À Ðdenied€you€probation.ÓÓи °` ü!` ü! Ðà ` àÔ#†X—’XX XqX)#ÔÔ‡ XqXXX—’ÔÌà ` àFirst,€the€appellant€argues€that€the€presumption€of€correctness€does€not€applyÐ xp  Ðto€the€trial€courtððs€decision€because€it€did€not€consider€the€appropriate€factors€forÐ XP  Ðdenying€probation.€€Second,€he€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€placing€theÐ 80  Ðburden€of€probation€on€the€appellant€because€he€was€entitled€to€the€presumption€ofÐ  Ðan€alternative€sentence.€€€€€€Ð øð Ðà ` àÔ#†X—’XX Xq2#ÔÔ‡ XqXXX—’ÔÌà ` àThis€courtððs€review€of€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence€isÐ ¸° Ðòòde€novoóó€with€a€presumption€that€the€determination€made€by€the€trial€court€is€correct.€Ð ˜ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€(1997).€€òòSee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Binghamóó,€910€S.W.2dÐ xp Ð448€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.€1995).€€This€presumption€isÐ X P Ðonly€applicable€if€the€record€demonstrates€that€the€trial€court€properly€consideredÐ 8"0 Ðrelevant€sentencing€principles.€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€Ð $ ÐThe€record€reflects€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€relevant€principles€ofÐ ø%ð! Ðsentencing;€accordingly,€the€presumption€is€afforded.Ð Ø'Ð # ÐÌà ` àÔ#†X—’XX XqF4#ÔÔ‡ XqXXX—’ÔThe€appellantððs€argument€that€ð ðthe€trial€court€erred€when€it€held€that€HurstÐ ˜+$' Ð[appellant]€had€the€burden€of€demonstrating€that€probation€was€appropriateðð€isÐ x-p&) Ðmisplaced.€€It€is€settled€law€that€whereas€the€State€has€the€burden€of€overcomingÐ X/P(+ Ðthe€defendantððs€entitlement€to€the€statutory€presumption€of€an€alternative€sentence,Ð 810*- Ðð ð[òòc]onverselyóó,€the€defendant€has€the€burden€of€establishing€suitability€for€fullÐ 3,/ Ðprobation,€even€if€the€defendant€is€entitled€to€the€statutory€presumption€of€alternativeÐ ø4ð-1 Ðsentencing.ðð€€òòBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€455„456€(emphasis€added)òòóó.€€€When€decidingÐ Ø6Ð/3 Ðsuitability€for€probation,€although€not€controlling,€the€sentencing€court€should€use€theÐ ¸8°15 Ðfollowing€criteria:€Ð  ÐÓÓà8 ` à(1)€ð ðthe€nature€and€[circumstances]€of€the€criminal€conduct€involved,ððÐ èà ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(b)(4);ÐØ Ð` ü!` ü! Ðà8 ` à(2)€the€defendantððs€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation,€Tenn.Ð È À ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5);и °` ü!` ü! Ðà8 ` à(3)€whether€a€sentence€of€full€probation€would€unduly€depreciate€theÐ ¨   Ðseriousness€of€the€offense,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(B);€and€Ð˜ ` ü!` ü! Ðà8 ` à(4)€whether€a€sentence€other€than€full€probation€would€provide€anÐ ˆ€ Ðeffective€deterrent€to€others€likely€to€commit€similar€crimes,€Tenn.Ð xp  ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(B).€Ðh` ` ü!` ü! ÐÓ|;ÓÓÛ4ÓÌÓÄ>Ó€òòSeeóó€òòBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€456.€€Denial€of€probation€may€be€based€solely€uponÐ H@  Ðthe€circumstances€of€the€offense€when€they€are€of€such€a€nature€as€to€outweigh€allÐ (  Ðother€factors€favoring€probation.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€788„89€(Tenn.Ð  ÐCrim.€App.€1991).€€€€€€Ô#†X—’XX XqÛ7#ÔÔ‡ XqXXX—’ԀРèà ÐÌà ` àThe€facts€and€circumstances€of€this€case€are€clearly€aggravated.€€The€recordÐ ¨  Ðreveals€a€callous€indifference€by€the€appellant€for€the€gravity€of€this€criminal€offenseÐ ˆ€ Ðin€which€the€child€experienced€countless€bruises€to€his€entire€body€and€even€severeÐ h` Ðbruising€to€his€genitalia.€€The€appellant€repeatedly€stated€that€the€abuse€to€the€childÐ H!@ Ðwas€only€the€result€Ô#†X—’XX Xqo@#ÔÔ‡ XqXXX—’Ôof€ð ðplay€fighting€too€roughðð€and€ð ðhit[ting]€too€hard€or€somethingððÐ (#  Ðindicating€further€a€Ô#†X—’XX XqŠB#ÔÔ‡ XqXXX—’Ôlack€of€repentance€and€remorse.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Piersonóó,€678Ð %  ÐS.W.2d€905€(Tenn.€1984)€(finding€lack€of€remorse€sufficient€basis€to€deny€probation).€Ð è&à" ÐMoreover,€the€trial€court€noted€and€the€record€supports€the€appellantððs€lack€ofÐ È(À!$ Ðcandor€which€reflects€negatively€upon€the€appellantððs€potential€for€rehabilitation€andÐ ¨* #& Ðis€a€sufficient€basis€for€denying€total€probation.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894€S.W.2dÐ ˆ,€%( Ð301,€305„306€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994);€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5).€€€Ð h.`'* ÐÌà ` àUpon€òòde€novoóó€review€and€in€accord€with€the€presumption€of€correctness,€weÐ (2 +. Ðare€unable€to€conclude€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€determining€that€the€appellant€hadÐ 4-0 Ðnot€met€his€burden€of€establishing€suitability€for€full€probation.€Ð è5à.2 Ðà ` àÌòòóóà0 ` àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€Ô#†X—’XX XqDC#ÔШ9 26` T$` T$ ЇÓÓÔ‡X—’XXX—’ÔÌÌÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à____________________________________Ð † ~ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JudgeÐ l d ÐÌÌCONCUR:Ð   ÐÌÌÌÌ_________________________________________Ð œ”  ÐGARY€R.€WADE,€JudgeÐ ‚z  ÐÌÌ_________________________________________Ð 4, ÐDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JudgeÐ  ÐÔ#†X—’XXX—’µG#ÔÌà ` à