ÿWPC?) ç}-•J“âÆnÉD(„à©õBW£Š9å¡T°†VïÔáàuˆ™òë4­–:Ä€¡,9· µŽŸ4úÇ3ÁÚ¨´yÁo­*ç\Ìs>l"¹Ô±«Ü#JÒ×zSZ›mÿÜnqÅXúãø¹´'²ŠøÔ ´´|ŽŠ5ç„Dc%[4ÚGéøìhÈùHë.Dl[FƒàꨢëëÉñgÇðx‡öàEÒåLRc6nbÓÿ§A$Qx«£û…Ö&•idG,š‡f¡OY˜"±aöDÈÍD3‡Þwîa¼¨†¨²^àh8¼— `ÏSc]V¯Æ„{ÖB96iŽ\(Ȳ–<ìq$¦5ý¯‘ðºÄ ¯–KÔ{«û†>BôÜïV”Îb‡û/?ÄbK°Òà*ŸæaÂ(¸ ¾·¨ùgmÜÆEƒ°Oêyçâ,s‡½,ÛáØ.F% 7¸÷AÌgp1XóÒMÁÑÝ„œÅwV}@án1¾ÜzGó[MÅj5°ˆ x% uY# ?8põŠÃÖºù€Ž+DÉ[[È~Í“¡õOBH#l¯Ð"†ÇŽãë×úîS)ÃçâmNËÝ¥’l“…à3FLtd¬»mÙ©K§ƒ¾o×…eàèa ’j£;%æA…U.F %t bz ~ Ë ÏÖ¥n­µb 0(jU:’w¸Ì4„ݘ 0 ™u 0DU:RŒËŽÇYU: U:Zê”U:~ê¸U:¢ ¢ ÝÜ U:¹!Ùó!U:Ì&Ì&Ì& B'''''''' D3#'#'#' 0DV'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V'V' AOš'Æé'é' 0D¯( D/ó( B")<þ6X9`(CourierX ù ƒÝ ƒ*„$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X¹‘XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝTenn.€R.€App.€P.€9. ÁÝ ƒ$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XBGXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòStowersóó€actually€addressed€the€purpose€of€section€55„10„410,€althoughÐ `  ÐòòGilbertóó€cites€it€as€authority€for€the€purpose€of€subsection€55„10„406(a)(1).€€òòSeeóóÐ P ð ÐòòStowersóó,€649€S.W.2d€at€608.€€We€note,€however,€that€both€subsection€55„10„Ð @ à Ð410(a)€and€subsection€55„10„406(a)(1)€contain€virtually€identical€lists€of€medicalÏpersonnel€from€which€the€person€taking€the€sample€is€to€be€chosen.€€òòCompareóóÐ  À ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„406(a)(1)€€òòwithóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„410(a).€Ð ° ÐSubsection€55„10„406(a)(1)€immunizes€these€individuals€from€non„negligent€civilÏand€criminal€liability€in€the€performance€of€their€duties€attendant€to€taking€theÏsample,€while€subsection€55„10„410(a)€mandates€that€the€sample€"shall"€beÏdrawn€by€an€individual€in€one€of€the€enumerated€categories.€€Given€the€similarityÏof€the€two€statutes,€we€believe€òòGilbertóó€is€compelling€authority€for€the€purpose€ofÐ À`  Ðsubsection€55„10„406(a)(1),€notwithstanding€its€reliance€upon€òòStowersóó.€ ÅÝ ƒ$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XBGXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝSection€55„10„406€provides€greater€individual€protection€than€the€UnitedÐ `  ÐStates€and€Tennessee€Constitutions€with€respect€to€the€voluntariness€of€blood€€€€€Ð P ð  Ðalcohol€sampling.€€òòCleo€Masonóó,€slip€op.€at€12€(citations€omitted).€€The€net€effectÐ `  Ðof€subsection€(e)€is€to€strip€defendants€in€cases€of€aggravated€assault€andÏhomicide€by€use€of€a€motor€vehicle€of€the€statute's€greater€protections,€leavingÏthem€with€only€the€lesser€constitutional€protections.€€òòSee€generallyóó€òòCleo€Masonóó,Ð 0 Ð Ðslip€op.€at€10„22.3|xš!«<þ6X9`(CourierXôxþ6X@ɹ`7ûX@($¡¡, øð AZ"Arial Regularm![n![o![p![q!w!x!Dy!z!D{!|!E}!~!E!€!!D‚!Dƒ!„!E…!†!‡!ˆ!‰!Š!D‹!eŒ!e!Ž!Ó€˜!uM% ÓÝ ƒ$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XBGXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThis€subsection€was€amended€in€1996€to€provide€for€a€twelve„monthÐ `  Ðsuspension.€€(I(2*„$¤¤Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X¹‘XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular øÝ ƒ$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XBGXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThis€statement€does€not€appear€in€the€transcript€of€that€hearing€that€hasÐ `  Ðbeen€provided€to€this€court€in€the€record. ÁÝ ƒ$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X2SXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòStowersóó€actually€addressed€the€purpose€of€section€55„10„410,€althoughÐ `  ÐòòGilbertóó€cites€it€as€authority€for€the€purpose€of€subsection€55„10„406(a)(1).€€òòSeeóóÐ P ð ÐòòStowersóó,€649€S.W.2d€at€608.€€We€note,€however,€that€both€subsection€55„10„Ð @ à Ð410(a)€and€subsection€55„10„406(a)(1)€contain€virtually€identical€lists€of€medicalÏpersonnel€from€which€the€person€taking€the€sample€is€to€be€chosen.€€òòCompareóóÐ  À ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„406(a)(1)€€òòwithóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„410(a).€Ð ° ÐSubsection€55„10„406(a)(1)€immunizes€these€individuals€from€non„negligent€civilÏand€criminal€liability€in€the€performance€of€their€duties€attendant€to€taking€theÏsample,€while€subsection€55„10„410(a)€mandates€that€the€sample€"shall"€beÏdrawn€by€an€individual€in€one€of€the€enumerated€categories.€€Given€the€similarityÏof€the€two€statutes,€we€believe€òòGilbertóó€is€compelling€authority€for€the€purpose€ofÐ À`  Ðsubsection€55„10„406(a)(1),€notwithstanding€its€reliance€upon€òòStowersóó.€ ½Ý ƒ$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XBGXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝSection€55„10„406€provides€greater€individual€protection€than€the€UnitedÐ `  ÐStates€and€Tennessee€Constitutions€with€respect€to€the€voluntariness€of€bloodÐ P ð ñ Ðalcohol€sampling.€€òòCleo€Masonóó,€slip€op.€at€12€(citations€omitted).€€The€net€effectÐ `  Ðof€subsection€(e)€is€to€strip€defendants€in€cases€of€aggravated€assault€andÏhomicide€by€use€a€motor€vehicle€of€the€statute's€greater€protections,€leavingÏthem€with€only€the€lesser€constitutional€protections.€€òòSee€generallyóó€òòCleo€Masonóó,Ð 0 Ð Ðslip€op.€at€10„22.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular àÔ€X¹‘XXXÔÔ€HXX¹‘ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X¹‘XHÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€30,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular àÔ€X¹‘XXXÔÔ€HXX¹‘ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X¹‘XHÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€29,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ÓÝ ƒ$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X2SXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThis€subsection€was€amended€in€1996€to€provide€for€a€twelve„monthÐ `  Ðsuspension.€€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ÏÝ ƒ$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X2SXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòStowersóó€actually€addressed€the€purpose€of€section€55„10„410,€althoughÐ `  ÐòòGilbertóó€cites€it€as€authority€for€the€purpose€of€subsection€55„10„406(a)(1).€€òòSeeóóÐ P ð ÐòòStowersóó,€649€S.W.2d€at€608.€€We€note,€however,€that€both€subsection€55„10„Ð @ à Ð410(a)€and€subsection€55„10„406(a)(1)€contain€virtually€identical€lists€of€medicalÏpersonnel€from€which€the€person€taking€the€sample€is€to€be€chosen.€€òòCompareóóÐ  À ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„406(a)(1)€€òòwithóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„410(a).€Ð ° ÐSubsection€55„10„406(a)(1)€immunizes€these€individuals€from€non„negligent€civilÏand€criminal€liability€in€the€performance€of€their€duties€attendant€to€taking€theÏsample,€while€subsection€55„10„410(a)€mandates€that€the€sample€"shall"€beÏdrawn€by€an€individual€in€one€of€the€enumerated€categories.€€Given€the€similarityÏof€the€two€statutes,€we€believe€òòGilbertóó€is€compelling€authority€for€the€purpose€ofÐ À`  Ðsubsection€55„10„406(a)(1),€notwithstanding€its€reliance€upon€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€òòStowers.óó€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d""""'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝñŒ!ñ›ñŒ!ññŒ!ññ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ññŒ!ññ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÓ  ÓÑTR[  AØ'Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€ X‚XXXÔÑ7€ ‚ XXdðdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑñŽ!ñœñŽ!ññ˜!ññŽ!ñßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@EÈf ` 8ttxP` ð  rßñŽ!ññ˜!ññ˜!ñßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@EÈf ` 8ttxP` ð  rßñ˜!ññŽ!ñ›ñŽ!ñÌÑ€Ñò òà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ P ð ÐÌ€à@@@'àAT€NASHVILLEˆÐ 0 Ð ÐÌà@77%àJUNE€1998€SESSIONó óˆÐ ° ÐÌÌÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€à À àà  àó ó)Ð Ðp  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ À`  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellant,à h àà À àà  à)à p àC.C.A.€No.€01C01„9707„CR„00253Ð °P  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìvs.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àPutnam€Countyà x àÐ 0  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìò òJERRY€HUSKINS,à  àà h àà À àó óà  à)à p àHon.€John€Turnbull,€Judge€ò òÐ p Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð ` Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellee.à h àà À àà  à)à p à(DUI€„€Interlocutory€State€Appeal)Ð Pð Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌÌÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à h àà À àà  àà p àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:Ð   ÐÌò òJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPà h àà À àà  àà p àDON€DICKERSONÐ à€ Ðó óAttorney€General€&€Reporterò òà À àà  àà p àó óAttorney€at€LawÐ Ð p Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à310„D€E.€Broad€St.Ìò òELIZABETH€B.€MARNEYà h àà À àà  àà p àó óCookeville,€TN€€38501Ð °"P ÐAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ425€Fifth€Ave.€N.,€2d€Floorò òÐ $0 Ðó óNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ð €%  ÐÌò òWILLIAM€EDWARD€GIBSONó óÐ `'  ÐDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌò òTONEY€CRAIGHEADÐ 0*Ð # Ðó óAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÐ  +À!$ Ð145€S.€Jefferson€Ave.ÌCookeville,€TN€€38501ÌÌÌò òÌOPINION€FILED:________________ÌÌREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDÌÌCURWOOD€WITT,€JUDGEó óÐ €4 +. ÐÐ  p5,/ÿ Ðà@qq*àò òòòOPINIONó óóóˆÐ `  ÐÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àWe€granted€the€state's€petition€for€an€interlocutory€appeal׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€in€thisÐ @ à Ðprosecution€for€driving€under€the€influence€to€review€the€Putnam€County€CriminalÏCourt's€order€suppressing€the€results€of€the€defendant's€blood€alcohol€test.€€The€trialÏcourt€suppressed€the€evidence€because€the€law€enforcement€officer€who€orderedÏthe€test€failed€to€warn€the€defendant€as€required€by€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÏsection€55„10„406(a)(2)€€that€failure€to€give€a€sample€would€result€in€suspension€ofÏthe€defendant's€driver's€license.€€For€the€reasons€that€follow,€we€find€the€trial€court'sÏruling€in€error.€€Accordingly,€we€reverse€the€order€suppressing€the€evidence€andÏremand€this€matter€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings€consistent€with€thisÏopinion.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àLaw€enforcement€officers€discovered€the€defendant€at€the€scene€of€aÏone„car€wreck.€€The€defendant€was€transported€by€emergency€medical€personnelÏto€a€local€hospital€for€treatment€of€his€injuries.€€While€the€defendant€was€at€theÏhospital,€a€law€enforcement€officer€asked€the€defendant€to€give€a€sample€for€bloodÏalcohol€testing.€€The€defendant€agreed€to€give€the€sample.€€The€officer€did€not€tellÏthe€defendant€the€consequence€of€refusing€the€procedure.€€After€the€sample€wasÏdrawn,€the€defendant€was€arrested€for€the€crime€of€driving€under€the€influence.€ÌÌà@üü-àò òIó óˆÐ à.€%( Ðà ` àà ¸ àThe€primary€issue€for€the€court€is€whether€the€trial€court€correctlyÏsuppressed€the€blood€alcohol€test€results€based€upon€the€officer's€failure€to€give€theÏlicense€suspension€admonition.ÌÐ `6-0 Ðà ` àà ¸ àAs€pertinent€to€this€appeal,€Tennessee's€implied€consent€law€providesÌÓÓà8 ` à(a)(1)€€Any€person€who€drives€any€motor€vehicle€in€this€state€isÏdeemed€to€have€given€consent€to€a€test€for€the€purpose€ofÏdetermining€the€alcoholic€or€drug€content€of€that€person's€blood;Ïprovided€that,€such€test€is€administered€at€the€direction€of€a€lawÏenforcement€officer€having€reasonable€grounds€to€believe€suchÏperson€was€driving€while€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant€or€drug,Ïas€defined€in€ðð€55„10„405.€€Any€physician,€registered€nurse,€licensedÏpractical€nurse,€clinical€laboratory€technician,€licensed€paramedic€or,Ïnotwithstanding€any€other€provision€of€law€to€the€contrary,€licensedÏemergency€medical€technician€approved€to€establishò ò€ó óintravenousÐ °P  Ðcatheters,€or€technologist,€or€certified€and/or€nationally€registeredÏphlebotomist€who,€acting€at€the€written€request€of€a€law€enforcementÏofficer,€withdraws€blood€from€a€person€for€the€purpose€of€making€suchÏa€test,€shall€not€incur€any€civil€or€criminal€liability€as€a€result€of€theÏwithdrawing€of€such€blood,€except€for€any€damages€that€may€resultÏfrom€the€negligence€of€the€person€so€withdrawing.€€Neither€shall€theÏhospital€nor€other€employer€of€the€previously€listed€health€careÏprofessionals€incur,€except€for€negligence,€any€civil€or€criminal€liabilityÏas€a€result€of€the€act€of€withdrawing€blood€from€the€person.Ð ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌà8 ` à(2)€Any€law€enforcement€officer€who€requests€that€the€driver€of€aÏmotor€vehicle€submit€to€a€test€pursuant€to€this€section€for€the€purposeÏof€determining€the€alcoholic€or€drug€content€of€the€driver's€blood,€shall,Ïprior€to€conducting€such€test,€advise€that€refusal€to€submit€to€such€testÏwill€result€in€the€suspension€of€the€driver's€operator's€license€by€theÏcourt.€€The€court€having€jurisdiction€of€the€offense€for€which€suchÏdriver€was€placed€under€arrest€shall€not€have€the€authority€to€suspendÏthe€license€of€a€driver€who€refused€to€submit€to€the€test€if€such€driverÏwas€not€advised€of€the€consequences€of€such€a€refusal.Ð ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌà8 ` à(3)€€If€such€person€having€been€placed€under€arrest€and€thereafterÏhaving€been€requested€by€a€law€enforcement€officer€to€submit€to€suchÏtest€and€advised€of€the€consequences€for€refusing€to€do€so,€refusesÏto€submit,€the€test€shall€not€be€given€and€such€person€shall€beÏcharged€with€violating€this€subsection.€€The€determination€as€toÏwhether€a€driver€violated€the€provisions€of€this€subsection€shall€beÏmade€at€the€same€time€and€by€the€same€court€as€the€one€disposingÏof€the€offense€for€which€such€driver€was€placed€under€arrest.€€If€theÏcourt€finds€that€the€driver€violated€the€provisions€of€this€subsection,Ïthe€driver€shall€not€be€considered€as€having€committed€a€criminalÏoffense;€however,€the€court€shall€suspend€the€license€of€such€driverÏfor€a€period€of€six€(6)€months.ñq!ñ׃×ñq!ññq!ñ׃×ñq!ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×а1P(+` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌà8 ` à(b)€€Any€person€who€is€unconscious€as€a€result€of€an€accident€or€isÏunconscious€at€the€time€of€arrest€or€apprehension€or€otherwise€in€aÏcondition€rendering€that€person€incapable€of€refusal,€shall€beÏsubjected€to€the€test€as€provided€for€by€ðððð€55„10„405€„€55„10„412,€butÐ `6-0 Ðthe€results€thereof€shall€not€be€used€in€evidence€against€that€personÏin€any€court€or€before€any€regulatory€body€without€the€consent€of€theÏperson€so€tested.€€Refusal€of€release€of€the€evidence€so€obtained€willÏresult€in€the€suspension€of€that€person's€driver['s]€license,€thus€suchÏrefusal€of€consent€shall€give€such€person€the€same€rights€of€hearingÏand€determinations€as€provided€for€conscious€and€capable€personsÏin€this€section.Ð ` Ð ` Ð  Ðà ` àÌà ` à.€.€.€ÌÌà8 ` à(e)€€Nothing€in€this€section€shall€affect€the€admissibility€in€evidence,€inÏcriminal€prosecutions€for€aggravated€assault€or€homicide€by€the€useÏof€a€motor€vehicle€only,€of€any€chemical€analysis€of€the€alcoholic€orÏdrug€content€of€the€defendant's€blood€which€has€been€obtained€byÏany€means€lawful€without€regard€to€the€provisions€of€this€section.Ð ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„406(a)(1),€(a)(2),€(a)(3),€(b),€(e)€(Supp.€1995)€(amendedÏ1996).ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àThe€state€argues€that€the€statutory€scheme€does€not€contemplateÏsuppression€of€lawfully€obtained€evidence€if€a€driver€consents€to€the€blood€alcoholÏtest,€even€absent€the€license€suspension€admonition.€€Further,€the€state€claims,Ïlogic€dictates€that€the€statute€be€interpreted€to€allow€consensual€submission€toÏblood€alcohol€testing€without€recitation€of€the€consequences€of€failing€to€submit.€€OnÏthe€other€hand,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€proper€remedy€is€suppressionÏbecause€the€statute€speaks€in€clear,€unequivocal€terms€that€the€officer€"shall"€giveÏthe€license€suspension€warning€"prior€to"€the€test.€€Further,€according€to€theÏdefendant,€subsection€55„10„406(e)€carves€out€a€limited€exception€for€admissibilityÏof€evidence€obtained€without€the€admonition€only€if€the€defendant€faces€charges€forÏaggravated€assault€or€homicide€by€use€of€a€motor€vehicle.€€The€defendant€finds€theÏomission€of€the€crime€of€DUI€from€subsection€55„10„406(e)€to€be€telling€of€theÏlegislature's€intent€that€test€results€obtained€without€the€admonition€be€suppressedÏin€DUI€cases.€€ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àOur€review€of€the€statute€and€relevant€caselaw€leads€us€to€agree€withÐ  :À04 Ðthe€state.€€The€clear€purpose€of€the€admonition€requirement€is€to€warn€drivers€of€theÏconsequences€of€failing€to€comply€with€the€implied€consent€law.€€If€a€driver€has€beenÏso€warned€yet€refuses€a€blood€alcohol€test,€his€driver's€license€is€subject€toÏsuspension.€€The€warning€puts€him€on€notice€of€that€consequence.€€€AfterÏmandating€the€admonition€regarding€a€refusal€to€be€tested,€the€statute€in€the€nextÏsentence€states€the€result€of€the€refusal:€ñ‹!ñœñ‹!ñð ðTheñ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñ€court€.€.€.€shall€not€have€the€authorityÏto€suspend€the€license€of€a€driver€ñj!ñòòñj!ññk!ñòòñk!ñwho€ñj!ñòòñj!ññm!ññk!ñóóñk!ññm!ññl!ñóóñl!ñrefusedñl!ñóóñl!ñtoñm!ñóóñm!ñ€submit€to€the€test€ño!ñòòño!ññp!ñòòñp!ñifñn!ñóóñn!ñ€ñn!ñòòñn!ñsuchñn!ñóóñn!ñÐ  @  Ðñn!ñòòñn!ñdriverñn!ñóóñn!ññn!ñòòñn!ñwasñn!ñóóñn!ñ€ñn!ñòòñn!ñnotñn!ñóóñn!ñ€ñn!ñòòñn!ñadvisedñn!ñóóñn!ñ€ñn!ñòòñn!ñofñn!ñóóñn!ñ€ñn!ñòòñn!ñtheñn!ñóóñn!ñ€ñn!ñòòñn!ñconsequencesñn!ñóóñn!ñ€ñn!ñòòñn!ñofñn!ñóóñn!ññn!ñòòñn!ñsuchñn!ñóóñn!ññ‹!ñœñ‹!ññn!ñòòñn!ñrefusalñp!ñóóñp!ñño!ñóóño!ñ.ððñ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñ€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ €  Ð55„10„406(a)(2)€(emphasis€added).ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àThe€language€used€in€the€statute€makes€it€clear€that€the€warning€is€òònotóóÐ  À Ða€òòMirandaóó„type€warning€that€the€driver€is€not€compelled€to€give€evidence€againstÐ   Ðhimself.€€As€we€have€previously€observed,€an€officer's€request€that€a€driver€submitÏto€a€blood€alcohol€test€"is€not€governed€by€the€òòMirandaóó€rule."€€òòState€v.€Snappóó,€696Ð À!` ÐS.W.2d€370,€371€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1985);€òòsee€alsoóó€Ô‡XBGXX XBGÔòòState€v.€Frasieróó,€914€S.W.2dÐ  #@ Ð467,€471€n.4€(Tenn.€1996)€(òòMirandaóó€warnings€not€required€in€conjunction€withÐ €%  Ðrequest€that€driver€take€a€blood€alcohol€test€because€test€is€not€considered€to€be€anÏinterrogation)€(Reid,€J.,€dissenting);€òòState€v.€Blackwoodóó,€713€S.W.2d€677,€680Ð @)à" Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1986).Ô#† XBGXXXBGd.#Ô€€In€other€words,€test€results€obtained€from€a€consensualÐ  +À!$ Ðblood€alcohol€test€are€not€subject€to€suppression€simply€because€òòMirandaóó€warningsÐ - #& Ðwere€not€given.€€The€license€revocation€admonition€in€the€case€at€bar€did€not€evenÏrise€to€the€level€of€a€òòMirandaóó„type€warning;€òòa€fortiorióó,€the€defendant's€test€results€areÐ À0`'* Ðnot€subject€to€suppression€simply€because€the€admonition€was€not€given.€€òòSeeóóÐ  2@), ÐòòSnappóó,€696€S.W.2d€at€371.Ð €4 +. ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àThis€result€is€indirectly€supported€by€our€reasoning€in€òòState€v.€DennieÐ @8à.2 ÐRay€Lodenóó,€No.€03C01„9311„CR„00380€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Jan.€19,Ð  :À04 Ð1995),€òòperm.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1995).€€In€that€case,€the€defendant€argued€thatÐ `  Ðevidence€of€his€refusal€to€take€a€blood€alcohol€test€was€subject€to€suppressionÏbecause€the€officer€had€not€fully€complied€with€the€requirement€that€the€licenseÏsuspension€admonition€be€given.€€òòDennie€Ray€Lodenóó,€slip€op.€at€5.€€We€declined€toÐ   Ðhold€that€the€admissibility€of€the€defendant's€refusal€to€take€the€test€hinged€on€theÏofficer's€compliance€with€the€warning€requirement€of€subsection€55„10„406(a)(2).€ÏWe€see€no€reason€why€a€different€rule€should€apply€when€the€evidence€in€questionÏconsists€of€test€results,€rather€than€a€refusal€to€take€the€test.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àFurther,€this€holding€is€supported€by€analogy€to€òòState€v.€Gilbertóó,€751Ð @à ÐS.W.2d€454€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€€In€òòGilbertóó,€the€defendant€argued€that€the€trialÐ  À Ðcourt€erroneously€admitted€evidence€of€his€blood€alcohol€content€because€the€stateÏfailed€to€prove€that€his€blood€sample€was€drawn€in€accord€with€subsection€55„10„¼406(a)(1).€€òòGilbertóó,€751€S.W.2d€at€461.€€In€rejecting€this€argument,€a€panel€of€thisÐ À!` Ðcourt€observed€that€the€purpose€of€subsection€55„10„406(a)(1)€is€to€"protect€theÏdonor€[defendant]€from€being€subjected€to€unhealthful€conditions€in€the€procurementÏof€a€blood€sample€and€to€prohibit€the€donor€[defendant]€from€being€subjected€toÏunqualified€people€taking€samples."€€òòState€v.€Gilbertóó,€751€S.W.2d€454,€461€(Tenn.Ð @)à" ÐCrim.€App.€1988)€(quoting€òòState€v.€Stowersóó,€649€S.W.2d€607,€608„09€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð  +À!$ ÐApp.€1983)).ñ‹!ññq!ñœñq!ññ‹!ññq!ññ‹!ñ׃×ñ‹!ññ‹!ñ׃×ñ‹!ññq!ññq!ñ׃×ñq!ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×ñ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñ€€In€other€words,€the€purpose€of€the€statute€is€to€protect€the€defendantÐ - #& Ðfrom€a€concern€ancillary€to€the€admission€of€his€blood€alcohol€test€results€in€aÏprosecution€involving€alleged€drinking€and€driving.€€The€òòGilbertóó€panel€held€that€theÐ @ à Ðstate€was€not€required€to€prove€compliance€with€the€statute€as€a€prerequisite€toÏadmissibility.€€òòGilbertóó,€751€S.W.2d€at€461;€òòcf.óó€òòState€v.€Melvin€L.€Gipsonóó,€No.€86„66„IIIÐ   Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€August€19,€1986).ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àThe€situation€at€bar€is€analogous€to€òòGilbertóó.€€As€we€observed€above,Ð  @  Ðthe€clear€import€of€subsection€55„10„406(a)(2)€is€to€protect€a€driver€from€licenseÏsuspension€if€he€ñ‹!ñœñ‹!ñwasñw!ñ€notñw!ññ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñ€admonished€about€license€suspension.€€ñ‹!ñœñ‹!ññx!ñAñx!ññy!ñJust€añy!ñsñ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñ€òòGilbertóóÐ ` Ðfoundñ‡!ñ€ñ‡!ññ‹!ñœñ‹!ññz!ñwith›€respect›€toñz!ññˆ!ñ€thatñˆ!ññ‡!ññ{!ñthñ{!ññ‡!ññ|!ññ{!ñ€ñ{!ññ|!ññ‡!ññ}!ñe€ñ}!ññ‡!ññ~!ññ}!ñ;ñ}!ññ~!ññ‡!ññ!ñlatterñ!ññ‡!ññ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñ€subsection€ñ‹!ñœñ‹!ñ55„10„406(a)(1)ñ€!ñ€protects€the€defendant€from€ancillary€harm,ñ€!ññ!ñ,ñ!ññ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñÏñ‹!ñœñ‹!ññ‚!ñwe›€find›€thatñ‚!ññƒ!ñsñƒ!ññ„!ññƒ!ñpñƒ!ññ„!ññ…!ño€doesñ…!ññ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñ€subsection€ñ‹!ñœñ‹!ñ55„10„406(a)(2)ñ†!ñ.ñ†!ññ‰!ñ€The€latter€section€ñ‰!ññŠ!ññ†!ñ€€ñ†!ñ›€ñŠ!ñisñ‹!ñ›ñ‹!ñ€designed€to€advise€theÏdefendant€of€the€detriment€that€results€from€refusing€a€blood€test€in€connection€withÏDUI€or€other€drinking„and„driving€crimes.€€Thus,€the€statute's€purpose€is€òònotóó€to€carveÐ à€ Ðout€a€rule€of€exclusion€when€the€provisions€of€subsection€(a)(2)€have€not€beenÏfollowed.€As€applied€to€the€facts€of€the€case€at€bar,€the€officer's€non„compliance€withÏthe€license€suspension€warning€requirement€does€not€warrant€suppression€of€theÏdefendant's€blood€alcohol€test€results€at€trial.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àIn€reaching€this€result,€we€have€rejected€the€defendant's€argument€thatÏsubsection€55„10„406(e)€silently€mandates€suppression€of€test€results€in€a€caseÏsuch€as€the€one€at€bar.€€We€interpret€subsection€55„10„406(e)€as€addressing€theÏadmissibility€of€otherwise€lawfully€obtained€test€results€where€the€sample€was€notÏvoluntarily€taken,€i.e.€when€the€defendant€refuses€to€submit€voluntarily€to€testing€orÏwhen€the€defendant€is€unconscious€or€otherwise€incapable€of€rendering€consent€atÏthe€time€the€sample€is€drawn.ñ!ñœ×ƒ×ñ!ññ!ñ׃×ñ!ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòState€v.€Cleo€Masonóó,€No.€02C01„9310„Ð `6-0 ÐCC„00233,€slip€op.€at€11„22€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€Mar.€13,€1996)€(Wade,€J.,Ïconcurring€in€results€only);€òòState€v.€Terry€E.€Colorighóó,€No.€01C01„9112„CR„00380,Ð @ à Ðslip€op.€at€4„5€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€Oct.€22,€1992).€€Nothing€in€the€statute,Ïthe€developed€caselaw€of€this€state,€or€the€defendant's€brief€causes€us€to€believeÏthat€the€legislature€intended€for€subsection€(e)€to€operate€as€a€bar€to€admissibilityÏif€the€admonition€contemplated€by€subsection€(a)(2)€is€not€given.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àAccordingly,€the€trial€court€erred€in€suppressing€the€defendant's€bloodÏalcohol€test€results.ÌÌà@àà,àò òIIó óˆÐ  À Ðà ` àà ¸ àThe€defendant€has€raised€a€secondary€issue,€namely,€whether€theÏstate€waived€its€right€to€appeal€by€failing€to€comply€with€an€allegedly€agreed€uponÏabbreviated€time€for€filing€an€application€for€interlocutory€appeal.€€Apparently,€theÏassistant€district€attorney€announced€at€the€conclusion€of€the€suppression€hearingÏthat€he€would€decide€whether€to€pursue€an€appeal€within€ten€days.׃@×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€trial€courtÐ €%  Ðentered€an€order€suppressing€the€evidence€and€giving€the€state€ten€days€from€theÏdate€of€the€hearing€in€which€to€decide€whether€to€pursue€appellate€relief.€€The€stateÏinitiated€its€application€within€the€30€days€provided€by€Rule€of€Appellate€ProcedureÏ9(b),€but€not€within€the€ten€days€allowed€in€the€trial€court's€order.Ìò òÌó óà ` àà ¸ àThe€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€the€relief€he€seeks€because€the€trialÐ À0`'* Ðcourt€was€without€the€authority€to€shorten€the€time€period€for€the€state's€Rule€9Ïapplication.€€"The€supreme€court€has€the€power€to€prescribe€by€general€rules€theÏforms€of€process,€writs,€pleadings€and€motions,€and€the€practice€and€procedure€inÏall€of€the€courts€of€this€state€in€all€civil€and€criminal€suits,€actions€and€proceedings."ÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€16„3„402€(1994).€€"Each€of€the€other€courts€of€this€state€[courtsÏother€than€the€supreme€court]€may€adopt€additional€or€supplementary€rules€ofÏpractice€and€procedure€not€inconsistent€with€or€in€conflict€with€the€rules€prescribedÏby€the€supreme€court."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€16„3„407€(1994).€€The€trial€court'sÏinclusion€of€a€ten„day€period€for€seeking€a€Rule€9€appeal€is€in€direct€conflict€with€theÏsupreme€court's€edict€of€a€30„day€limitation€period€in€Rule€9(b).€€Accordingly,€theÏtrial€court€was€without€authority€to€alter€the€time€period,€and€the€state€cannot€beÏbound€by€a€ruling€the€trial€court€was€without€authority€to€issue.€€òòCfóó.€òòState€v.€Bestóó,Ð   Ð614€S.W.2d€791,€793€(Tenn.€1981)€(court€of€criminal€appeals€was€without€authorityÏto€impose€time€limitation€on€Rule€10€application€where€rule€does€not€impose€a€timeÏlimitation);€òòFord€Motor€Co.€v.€Moultonóó,€511€S.W.2d€690,€695€(Tenn.€1974)€(court€ofÐ  #@ Ðappeals€may€modify€its€rules€so€long€as€there€is€no€conflict€with€rules€of€the€supremeÏcourt).€€The€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€based€upon€the€state's€failure€toÏcomply€with€an€invalid€time€limitation.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àThe€trial€court's€order€suppressing€the€defendant's€blood€alcohol€testÏresults€is€reversed.€€This€case€is€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings.ÌÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à_______________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àCURWOOD€WITT,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌÌÐ  :À04 ÐCONCUR:ÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌR.€LEE€MOORE,€JR.,€SPECIAL€JUDGEÌ