WPCT aCURz>L়eѥiD2z3a2A=ᦅ*b`Bxiс #U"m#Ŷ # courtisrequiredtoaffordthestatethestrongestlegitimateviewoftheevidencecontainedinthe %*!$ recordaswellasallreasonableandlegitimateinferenceswhichmaybedrawnfromtheevidence. &"% Statev.Cabbage,571S.W.2d832,835(Tenn.1978). '#&    ` Questionsconcerningthecredibilityofthewitnesses,theweightandvaluetobe )$( giventheevidence,aswellasallfactualissuesraisedbytheevidenceareresolvedbythetrierof v*%) fact,notthiscourt.Id.InStatev.Grace,493S.W.2d474,476(Tenn.1973),oursupremecourt b+&* Oa    said: Aguiltyverdictbythejury,approvedbythetrialjudge,accreditsthetestimonyofthe  witnessesfortheStateandresolvesallconflictsinfavorofthetheoryofthestate.     `    ` Becauseaverdictofguiltremovesthepresumptionofinnocenceandreplacesitwith t apresumptionofguilt,theaccused,astheappellant,hastheburdeninthiscourtofillustratingwhy ` theevidenceisinsufficienttosupporttheverdictsreturnedbythetrieroffact.Statev.Tuggle,639 L  S.W.2d913,914(Tenn.1982).Thiscourtwillnotdisturbaverdictofguiltduetothesufficiency 8  oftheevidenceunlessthefactscontainedintherecordareinsufficient,asamatteroflaw,fora $ t rationaltrieroffacttofindthattheaccusedisguiltybeyondareasonabledoubt.Id.  `    ` Thedefendantarguesthatthejuryerroneouslyrejectedhistestimonythathis  8  statementwasnotgivenvoluntarilyandotherwisenottakenincompliancewithMirandav.Arizona, $  384U.S.436,442,86S.Ct.1602,1612(1966).Heclaimsthathadthejurydisregardedhis   inculpatoryverbalstatementstotheinvestigatingofficerandhissigned,writtenstatement,there   wouldbenootherphysicalevidenceortestimonylinkinghimtotheoffense.Thus,heargues,the   juryshouldhaveacquittedhim.      ` Insimplestterms,thedefendanthasaskedustoreweightheevidenceinhisfavor, \ notwithstandingthelegalprohibitiononourdoingso.SeeMatthews,805S.W.2dat779;Cabbage, H 571S.W.2dat835;XZ6 XXXQԀ#XQX XXZ6'#Liakas,199Tenn.at305,286S.W.2dat859.Asanappellatecourt,wemust 4 affordthestatethestrongestlegitimateviewoftheevidenceanddefertothejurysresolutionof  p credibilityissues.XZ6 XXXQԀ#XQX XXZ6&)#Grace,493S.W.2dat476.Inthepresentcase,thejuryobviouslyfoundthe  \ defendantstestimonyincredible,andthestatesproofissufficienttocarryitsburdenof H demonstratingguiltbeyondareasonabledoubt.Wearenotfreetodisturbthejurysresolutionof 4 thesefactualissues.      ` Thestatestrialevidenceshowedthatthedefendant,throughphysicalforce,tookthe  victimspurse.Theproofrevealedthatthedefendantsjuvenileaccompliceidentifiedthedefendant  asaprincipal.Thedefendantmadeoralandwrittenconfessionstothecrime.Thevictimspurse  andsomeofitscontentswererecoveredinalocationconsistentwiththedefendantsaccountof l wherethepursehadbeendiscarded.Viewedinthelightmostfavorabletothestate,thisevidence X  sufficientlysupportsthedefendantsrobberyconviction. D!    ` Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. #l!    `     h     ___________________________________ '#&    `     h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE