WPC7a ӹEˣ7HtWIzY< _T$HqW0qQV_&z!M*FmMZUT/qbbm #dm,sT7YY$Xfo3$]DMYSh] #Z\ &.ۆ '!sTǥ֧݁DŽ!|-2 Î?!UwvfTϮ퐎 =_P'*BV& (P|Vg0VVz!xL@C d1v7m w$Z}3OكZqڅT JIT;zu Fv}W}1X 6N*? 0>,? 0j? zb@@NA 0A 0B ztCCND 0D 0E zFGNG 0G 0H zpIINJ 0J 02K zK]U* ^U@7^UNw^h^^^^^^^ 1u-` 72` 0c`\\IB01S02\CLERKJAC,,,,0(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /    C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt*8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  ӁLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5*5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt*2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt*,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   !C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt*AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   &C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt*88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  ,C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt- -*// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h 2C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt*)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   7C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   <C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` AC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  FC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   KC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt1d1 ~/Y2CCA103|xU(|G2:!$ !.8dd8         0  &&& $_   x 23   x   0AA.Normal  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5   d\C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPT(|3&$ !.8dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  C:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3&$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK<AA:Definition T  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5fC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt86Definition(hh&H1  5+ ` hp x 5      5+ ` hp x 5  kC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(]]&H2  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H3  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  pC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(]]&H4  5+ ` hp x 5 XXX 5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H5  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  uC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(]]&H6  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  2DD0Address  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  zC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITEC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt,dl*CODEK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42EmphasisC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt4go2Keyboard K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted  /%  ,Kk %#/K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt<:zBottom of 7(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X75+ ` hp x 5  &  d d)1dxd<:zTop of For7(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X75+ ` hp x 5  )2dxd0KS.SampleK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  #$()*/04 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(O$<6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial(I Z(Times New Roman (9 Z6Times New Roman Regular ObionAcree P.J.TiptonvilleMcAlpin CrimUpchurchvenires*underrepresentationAdkins$underrepresentedStricklandHoneycuttClenny EvidPittman3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  !.8dd8     __   8ҏXXdd8@hhjFINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#jF#Ԉ #    @  @` September14,2004Session F XҏX #XXҏ&#ROGERNEALJAMESv.STATEOFTENNESSEEXҏX  ? @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforObionCounty  9 @@No.3259WilliamB.Acree,Jr.,Judge  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200400302CCAR3PCFiledNovember4,_2004_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^     Thepetitioner,RogerNealJames,appealsthedenialofpostconvictionrelief.Theissuesare V  whetherthepetitionerwasdeniedtheeffectiveassistanceofcounselandwhether#XXҏ#XҏXthejurywas ? raciallybiased.Thejudgmentisaffirmed. (x  Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtAffirmed  J   #Xҏ#XҏX.GaryR.Wade,P.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichNormaMcGeeOgleandAlan  E.Glenn,JJ.,joined.  DannyH.Goodman,Jr.,Tiptonville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,RogerNealJames.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;MichaelMarkham,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; Z andKevinMcAlpin,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. C @@OO& OPINION #XXҏ#XҏX e #XXҏ2 #XҏX    In1999,thepetitionerandacodefendantwereconvictedofsaleofcocaine#XXҏ #XҏXԀinexcessof.5  8  gramsinaschoolzone,aClassAfelony.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3917417,3917432.Thetrial !!! courtorderedasentenceoftwentyfiveyears.Ondirectappeal,thiscourtaffirmedboththe " " convictionandsentence.SeeStatev.RogerNealJamesandGeorgeOsborneWade,No.W2000 ## 01301CCAR3CD(Tenn.Crim.App.,atJackson,March15,2002).Oursupremecourtdenied $$ permissiontoappealonSeptember30,2002. u% %   OnAugust26,2003,thepetitionerfiledaprosepetitionforpostconvictionrelief,asserting G'"' thathewasentitledtoanewtrialonthebasisofnewlydiscoveredevidence.Thepostconviction 0(#( courtappointedcounseland,inanamendedpetition,thepetitionerallegedthathewasdeniedthe )i$) effectiveassistanceofcounselandcontendedthattheconvictingjuryhadbeen unconstitutionally *R%* selectedandimpaneled. *;&+   Attheevidentiaryhearing,thepetitioner,anAfricanAmerican,testifiedthathisallwhite , (- jurywasnot ajuryofhispeers.HeclaimedthattherewasonlyoneAfricanAmericanwoman -(. _inthejurypoolandthatshewasexcusedfromservice becauseoffamilyreasons.Thepetitioner  alsocontendedthathistrialcounselwasineffectiveforfailingtoobjecttothemakeupofthejury  pool,failingtoadvisehimofsentenceenhancementundertheDrugFreeSchoolZoneAct,failing  tocallcertainwitnesses,failingtointroducetheaudiotapeofthedrugtransaction,andfailingto k crossexaminethestateswitnesses.Hecomplainedthattrialcounselmetwithhimonlyonceprior T totrialandthatpriortotrial,hehadrejectedatwentyfiveyearpleaofferfromthestatebecausehe =  didnotunderstandthathewassubjecttoanenhancedsentenceforhavingcommittedtheoffense & v inaschoolzone.Accordingtothepetitioner,hehadaskedhistrialcounseltosubpoenaGeorge  _ Gentryasawitnessforthetrial.ThepetitionerclaimedthathewashelpingGentrymovefurniture  H onthedayoftheoffenseandthatGentrycouldprovideanalibi.Hetestifiedthathehadalso  1  requestedthattrialcounselusehisparentsaswitnessesbecausetheywouldconfirmthathewasnot    adrugdealer.Thepetitionerassertedthattrialcounselwasineffectivebyfailingtocrossexamine   anyofthestateswitnessesandfailingtoobjectwhenhewascrossexaminedonapendingdrug   charge.Thepetitionerconcluded, Ijustfeellikehedidntrepresentmethewayheshouldhave   [and,ifhehad,]Iprobablywouldntbeinthismess. n    Trialcounsel,ColinJohnson,whowasanassistantpublicdefender,testifiedthathedidnot @ objecttothejurypoolbecauseheknewofnoevidenceofsystematicexclusionofminoritiesanddid )y notbelievethattherewasalegalbasisforchallenge.Trialcounselstatedthathisnotesdocumented b severalpretrialmeetingswiththepetitionerandconfirmedthathisinvestigatorhadalsometwith K thepetitioner.Hespecificallyrecalledadvisingthepetitionerthatbecausethecrimehadoccurred 4 withinaschoolzone,hewassubjecttoanenhancedsentenceandwouldhavetoserveonehundred  percentofhistermifconvicted.Accordingtotrialcounsel,hiscasefileestablishedthatthe  petitionerhadrejectedapretrialpleaofferoffifteenyearsincarcerationanda$2,500fine.  Althoughhecouldnotrecallthecontentsoftheaudiotapeofthedrugtransaction,trialcounsel  contendedthathehadlistenedtothetapeinadvanceofthetrialandhaddeterminedthatitwould q notbehelpfultothedefense.TrialcounseltestifiedthatthepetitionerneveridentifiedGeorge Z GentryasawitnessbutdididentifyRalphAdams,theowneroftherentalpropertywherethe C offenseoccurred.HerememberedthatthepetitionerhadclaimedthatAdamshiredhimtoclean ,| carpetsonthedayoftheoffensebutthatwhenhisinvestigatorinterviewedAdams,Adamshadno e recollectionofhavingemployedthepetitionertodoso.Trialcounseltestifiedthathehad N strenuouslyobjectedtoproofofthepetitionerspendingdrugcharge.Whilehecouldnotrecall  7 crossexaminingthestateswitnesses,heconcededthathemaynothavedonesoifthewitnesses !   hadnot hurtthedefense. " !   Thepostconvictioncourtdeniedthepetition,firstconcludingthatalthoughtrialcounselhad $# presentedtheissueofracialcompositionofthejuryattrial,hehadnotpursuedtheissueonappeal t% $ andwaiver,therefore,applied.Thepostconvictioncourtspecificallyaccreditedthetestimonyof ]&!% trialcounselregardingthepetitionersclaimsofineffectiveassistanceofcounsel,findingthattrial F'"& counselhadmetwiththepetitionersufficientlypriortotrialandhadexplainedsentencingunderthe /(#' DrugFreeSchoolZoneAct.Thepostconvictioncourtalsoobservedthatbecausethepetitioner )h$( hadfailedtofiletheaudiotapeofthedrugtransactionattheevidentiaryhearingonthepost *Q%) convictionpetition,anyclaimofineffectivenesscouldnotbesustained.Italsoruledthatthetrial *:&* transcriptestablishedthatthestateswitnesseshad,infact,beencrossexaminedbydefensecounsel +#'+ duringthetrial.Finally,thepostconvictioncourtconcludedthatbecausetheadmissibilityofthe  pendingdrugchargehadbeenchallengedondirectappealandrejectedasabasisforrelief,the  petitionerwasnotentitledtopostconvictionrelief.  @*I T   Initially,thepetitionerassertsthatheisentitledtoanewtrialbecauseminoritieswere & v unconstitutionallyexcludedfromthejurypool.Thestatecontendsthattheissueiswaivedfor  _ failuretoraiseitondirectappeal.  H   TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4030106,whichgovernspreliminaryconsiderationof    postconvictionpetitions,providesinpertinentpartasfollows:   8   ` Agroundforreliefiswaivedifthepetitionerpersonallyorthroughan   attorneyfailedtopresentitfordeterminationinanyproceedingbeforeacourtof n  competentjurisdictioninwhichthegroundcouldhavebeenpresentedunless:W    8   ` (1)Theclaimforreliefisbaseduponaconstitutionalrightnotrecognizedas @ existingatthetimeoftrialifeitherthefederalorstateconstitutionrequires )y retroactiveapplicationofthatright;orb   8   ` (2)Thefailuretopresentthegroundwastheresultofstateactioninviolation K ofthefederalorstateconstitution.4   Tenn.CodeAnn.4030106(g).    Althoughthetranscriptofthetrialisnotincludedintherecordonappeal,thiscourtmaytake  judicialnoticeofitsownrecordsonfile.SeeTenn.R.App.P.13(c);JamesWilliamDashv. q HowardW.Carlton,Warden,No.E200102867CCAR3PC(Tenn.Crim.App.,atKnoxville,Sept. Z 11,2002).Thepostconvictioncourt,whichhadthebenefitofthetranscript,foundthattrialcounsel C hadobjectedtothejurypoolpriortotrial.Theissuewasnotraisedondirectappeal.Thepetitioner ,| doesnotassertinthisproceedingthathistrialcounselwasineffectiveforfailingtoraisetheissue e onappeal.Inconsequence,thisisnotagroundforreliefinthispostconvictionproceeding. N SeeStatev.EddieHowardPittmanv.State,No.W200202892CCAR3PC(Tenn.Crim.App.,  7 atJackson,March18,2004);seealsoMiltonLeeCooperv.State,No.E200101527CCAR3PC !   (Tenn.Crim.App.,atKnoxville,Nov.18,2002)(addressingotherwisewaivedjuryinstructionissue " ! wherepetitionerassertedineffectiveassistanceofappellatecounsel). #"   Eveniftheissuehadnotbeenwaived,however,thepetitionerstillwouldnotbeentitledto t% $ relief.ArticleI,section9,oftheTennesseeConstitutionguaranteesallcriminaldefendantsaright ]&!% toajuryfrom theCountyinwhichthecrimeshallhavebeencommitted.Tenn.Const.art.I, F'"& 9;seealsoX XXXҏStatev.Upchurch,620S.W.2d540,542(Tenn.Crim.App.1980)#XҏX XX0#Ԁ(statingthat an /(#' accusedmustbetriedinthecountyinwhichthecrimesareallegedtohavebeencommitted). )h$( Moreover,acriminaldefendanthasaconstitutionalrighttoajurydrawnfromavenirethat *Q%) representsafaircrosssectionofthecommunity. Selectionofapetitjuryfromarepresentative *:&* crosssectionofthecommunityisanessentialcomponentoftheSixthAmendmentrighttoajury +#'+ trial.Statev.Bell,745S.W.2d858,860(Tenn.1988)(citingTaylorv.Louisiana,419U.S.522  (1975)).InDurenv.Missouri,439U.S.357,364(1979),theUnitedStatesSupremeCourtlisted  thecriteriaforestablishingaprimafacieviolationoftherequirementofafaircrosssection:  0    (1)thegroupallegedtobeexcludedisa distinctivegroupwithinthecommunity; T  (2)therepresentationofthegroupinveniresfromwhichjuriesareselectedisnotfairand & v reasonableinrelationtothenumberofsuchpersonsinthecommunity;and  _  (3)thisunderrepresentationisduetosystematicexclusionofthegroupinthejuryselection  1  process.  (#(# SeealsoStatev.Buck,670S.W.2d600,610(Tenn.1984);Adkinsv.State,911S.W.2d334(Tenn.   Crim.App.1995).X XXXҏ   #XҏX XX\7#  AlthoughtheAfricanAmericanpopulationofObionCountywouldconstitutea distinctive W  groupinthecommunity,thepetitionerdidnotproduceanyevidenceattheevidentiaryhearingthat @ AfricanAmericanswereunderrepresentedontheveniresorthattherewasasystematicexclusion )y ofAfricanAmericansfromthejuryselectionprocess.Atthepostconvictionhearing,thepetitioner b concededthathecouldnotestablisheitherdeficiencyintheperformanceofhistrialcounselor K prejudiceintheresultsofthetrialastothisissue,stating, Idonthaveanyphysicalproof[in 4 supportofthisclaim],nomorethanmyword.SeeStricklandv.Washington,466U.S.668(1984).  Inourview,reliefwasproperlydenied.  @)II    Next,thepetitionercontendsthattrialcounselwasineffectiveforfailingtoobjecttothejury Z pool,failingtoadvisehimthathissentencewouldbeenhancedundertheDrugFreeSchoolZone C Act,andfailingtocallmaterialwitnesses.Thestatedisagrees.X XXXҏ ,|   Whenapetitionerseekspost-convictionreliefonthebasisofineffectiveassistanceof N counsel,hemustfirstestablishthattheservicesrenderedortheadvicegivenwerebelow therange  7 ofcompetencedemandedofattorneysincriminalcases.Baxterv.Rose,523S.W.2d930,936 !   (Tenn.1975).Second,hemustshowthatthedeficiencies actuallyhadanadverseeffectonthe " ! defense.Strickland,466U.S.at693.Shouldthepetitionerfailtoestablisheitherfactor,heisnot #" entitledtorelief.Oursupremecourtdescribedthestandardofreviewasfollows: $# 8   ` Becausea[petitioner]mustestablishbothprongsofthetest,afailureto ]&!% proveeitherdeficiencyorprejudiceprovidesasufficientbasistodenyreliefonthe F'"& ineffectiveassistanceclaim.Indeed,acourtneednotaddressthecomponentsinany /(#' particularorderorevenaddressbothifthe[petitioner]makesaninsufficientshowing )h$( ofonecomponent.*Q%)   Goadv.State,938S.W.2d363,370(Tenn.1996). +#'+ Ї  Onclaimsofineffectiveassistanceofcounsel,thepetitionerisnotentitledtothebenefitof  hindsight,maynotsecond-guessareasonablybasedtrialstrategy,andcannotcriticizeasound,but  unsuccessful,tacticaldecisionmadeduringthecourseoftheproceedings.Adkinsv.State,911  S.W.2d334,347(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).Suchdeferencetothetacticaldecisionsofcounsel, k however,appliesonlyifthechoicesaremadeafteradequatepreparationforthecase.Cooperv. T State,847S.W.2d521,528(Tenn.Crim.App.1992). =    Underourstatutorylaw,thepetitionerbearstheburdenofprovingtheallegationsinhispost  _ convictionpetitionbyclearandconvincingevidence.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.40-30-110(f).  H Evidenceisclearandconvincingwhenthereisnoseriousorsubstantialdoubtabouttheaccuracy  1  oftheconclusionsdrawnfromtheevidence.Hicksv.State,983S.W.2d240,245(Tenn.Crim.App.    1998).Claimsofineffectiveassistanceofcounselareregardedasmixedquestionsoflawandfact.   Statev.Honeycutt,54S.W.3d762,766-67(Tenn.2001);Statev.Burns,6S.W.3d453,461(Tenn.   1999).Onappeal,thefindingsoffactmadebythepostconvictioncourtareconclusiveandwillnot   bedisturbedunlesstheevidencecontainedintherecordpreponderatesagainstthem.Brooksv. n  State,756S.W.2d288,289(Tenn.Crim.App.1988).Theburdenisonthepetitionertoshowthat W  theevidencepreponderatedagainstthosefindings.Clennyv.State,576S.W.2d12,14(Tenn.Crim. @ App.1978).#XҏX XX<#X XXXҏԀThecredibilityofthewitnessesandtheweightandvaluetobeaffordedtheirtestimony )y arequestionstoberesolvedbythetrialcourt.Batesv.State,973S.W.2d615(Tenn.Crim.App. b 1997).Whenreviewingtheapplicationoflawtothosefactualfindings,however,ourreviewisde K novo,andthetrialcourtsconclusionsoflawaregivennopresumptionofcorrectness.Fieldsv. 4 State,40S.W.3d450,457-58(Tenn.2001);seealsoStatev.England,19S.W.3d762,766(Tenn.  2000).#XҏX XXI#    Asindicated,thepostconvictioncourtdeterminedthat,contrarytothepetitioners  assertions,thetrialrecordestablishedthattrialcounseldidobjecttothemakeupofthejurypool q priortotrial.Underthesecircumstances,nofaultcanbeattributedtotrialcounsel.Furthermore, Z hadthepetitionerallegedthathiscounselwasdeficientforfailingtopresenttheissueonappeal, C nothingintheevidentiaryhearingestablishesthatanyprejudiceresulted. ,|   Thepetitioneralsoassertsthattrialcounselwasineffectiveforfailuretoexplainsentence N enhancementundertheDrugFreeSchoolZoneAct.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3917432.Trial  7 counseltestifiedattheevidentiaryhearingthathemetwiththepetitioneronseveraloccasionsprior !   totrialandthoroughlyexplainedsentenceenhancementundertheAct.Thepostconvictioncourt " ! specificallyfoundthat thetestimonyofthepetitionerstrialcounsel[was]morecrediblethanthe #" testimonyofthepetitioner.Ourscopeofreviewislimited.Inourview,theevidencedoesnot $# preponderateagainstthepostconvictioncourtsconclusionthattrialcounselwasnotineffectivein t% $ hispretrialadvicetothepetitioner. ]&!%   Finally,thepetitionercontendsthattrialcounselwasineffectiveforfailingtocallcertain /(#' materialwitnessestotestifyattrial.Atthepostconvictionhearing,thepetitionertestifiedthathe )h$( hadaskedtrialcounseltocallGeorgeGentrytoestablishanalibi.Gentry,however,wasnota *Q%) witness.Whenapetitionercontendsthattrialcounselfailedtodiscover,interview,orpresenta *:&* witnessinsupportofhisdefense,heshouldpresentthatwitnessattheevidentiaryhearingonthe +#'+ postconvictionclaim.Blackv.State,794S.W.2d752,757(Tenn.Crim.App.1990)X XXXҏ.The  petitioneralsoclaimedthathewantedtrialcounseltocallhisparentstotestifythathewasnota  drugdealer.Becausethepetitionersparentsalsodidnottestifyattheevidentiaryhearing,the  recorddoesnotdemonstrateanyentitlementtorelief.Moreover,itisunlikelythatsuchevidence k wouldhavebeenhelpfultothedefenseattrial.SeeTenn.R.Evid.402. T   Accordingly,thejudgmentofthepostconvictioncourtisaffirmed. & v #XҏX XXU#   `     h     ___________________________________       `     h     GARYR.WADE,PRESIDINGJUDGE