ÿWPCQ âi/ÌŸ!Éw·Ë˜PK±ˆ°©žv«GJ€Êjv­˜vÓýkÂgÖâk2æMƒÄ‚‡Ð…³"6Õ*‚˜!¸êý.f¢¼Ý„?;Ø(âx(p…amÙQÝ=†@â àÙñIî54r˜þ!Eé@$¸úƒQšy0‚—´#ï^ ß¿nÖQ[1ì>ØYßÃæmIy®Sá•&ž½ W‰6½ÛS–¥Áv»f¼P’܇hÉ LÇy©âMdäPYR„¯µÜ»l¥fFi§ë?DŽzhB]Ë6¼Ëúm uâŒÁ$hÞ«ÓM Jƒvg–©ðÖ´1,¡ÐÙ©¤IÂèäªzjI]Ö‡…|šñžÞƒ‘¼'ï33½­~N–ÐèÚêªB‹ŸÈ”ñ0Ò`¡’=42GÀI†ó¯}VÛ•Ê6•Ï)‘ØÅ¿Ü^Ù?MYy=ÀŒÌ«ÛϨES’(\§Ïç8®—çVö64bú™Ûа…ج.ò½jƒ‹xv B¸HÐO”ÁYR½_@¶*nŒÿ M¡:ˆMxw²ØùÛlŸ‘ôÐB,²û)×G4\VFá÷etbÓ~2wåƒ#L7žù;uHºò+þ[ʰg$|+/ü ™ p95¢¸×4 ÑŒLSç,'q©ŒbN\ %^ 0ˆdU$Nì z:Ò´^ † z’ Ò wÞ 4â ö  Æ ÆÍ Æ“ ÆY mN6#Á8U@ùE99 0D;¿‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡bFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 0ëNNNN B99 0¤V D3ú D-- 0KZZ AS¥Æø 0¤¾ 0Db A«¦»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptí¬q)  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÖJ~'Ä£¥3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman (#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó  µÝ ƒRL$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôadò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€€We€note€that€the€judgment€incorrectly€states€that€the€appellant€pled€guilty€to€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô,€òòthirdóó€offense€or€over.€Ð ° ÐHowever,€the€judgment€clearly€shows€that€the€appellant€pled€guilty€to€a€felony,€which€would€be€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô,€òòfourthóó€offense€orÐ n¾ Ðover.€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„403(a)(1)(1997).€Additionally,€the€trial€judge€makes€reference€to€the€appellantÐ ,| Ðpleading€guilty€to€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô,€fourth€offense€or€over.- ù-(|G2L$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôadò»»Ô d(|3Ži$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Ži$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ »»»ÔÑ8€y XXdæ»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î3k ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼ »îî3k #ԈРР ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€September€20,€2000€SessionÐ ð@ ÐÔ‡Xy X»¼ ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ »XXy +#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€KENNETH€RAY€Ô_ÔJARMANÔ_ÔÔ‡Xy X»¼ Ôó óÐ ä4 ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€as€of€Right€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Montgomery€CountyÐ Ø ( Ðà@@øøìàNo.€40524€€€€€€John€H.€Ô_ÔGasawayÔ_Ô,€III,€JudgeÐ ¾  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<o` AßÐ pÀ  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M1999„01382„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€November€17,€2000Ð eµ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<0` AßÐ 1  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€appellant,€Kenneth€Ray€Ô_ÔJarmanÔ_Ô,€pled€guilty€in€the€Montgomery€County€Criminal€Court€to€oneÐ &v  Ðcount€of€driving€under€the€influence€(hereinafter€ð ðÔ_ÔDUIÔ_Ôðð),€fourth€offense€or€over,€a€class€E€felony;Ð  \ Ðone€count€of€driving€on€a€revoked€license,€sixth€offense,€a€class€A€misdemeanor;€and€one€count€ofÐ òB Ðviolating€the€open€container€law,€a€class€C€misdemeanor.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€appellant€toÐ Ø( Ðtwo€years€incarceration€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€for€the€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€conviction,€andÐ ¾ Ðimposed€a€$3000€fine.€€The€trial€court€also€sentenced€the€appellant€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nineÐ ¤ô Ðdays€incarceration€in€the€Montgomery€County€Jail€for€the€driving€on€a€revoked€license€conviction,Ð ŠÚ Ðand€imposed€a€$350€fine.€The€trial€court€further€sentenced€the€appellant€to€thirty€days€incarcerationÐ pÀ Ðin€the€Montgomery€County€Jail€for€the€violation€of€the€open€container€law.€€Additionally,€the€trialÐ V¦ Ðcourt€ordered€the€appellantððs€sentences€to€be€served€concurrently.€€The€appellant€raises€the€followingÐ <Œ Ðissues€for€review:€(1)€whether€the€enhancing€factors€applied€by€the€trial€€court€were€inapplicable€toÐ "r Ðthis€case;€and€(2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€the€appellant€to€serve€the€full€term€of€hisÐ X Ðtwo„year€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction.€€Upon€review€of€the€record€and€theÐ î> Ðpartiesðð€briefs,€we€affirm€in€part€and€modify€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð Ô$ ÐÔ#†¼ »XXy ¿#ÔÔ‡Xy X»¼ ÔÌÓóÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€is€Affirmed€asÐ † Ö  Ðmodified.ó óÐ l!¼! ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ »àXy  #ÔÔ‡Xy X.¼ ÔNorma€McGee€Ogle,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Welles,óó€and€òòJoeÐ 8#ˆ# ÐG.€Riley,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð $n$ ÐÌCollier€W.€Ô_ÔGoodlettÔ_Ô,€Clarksville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Kenneth€Ray€Ô_ÔJarmanÔ_Ô.Ð ê%:!& ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter,€Elizabeth€T.€Ryan,€Assistant€Attorney€General,Ð ¶'#( Ðand€Daniel€Ô_ÔBrollierÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð œ(ì#) ÐÓÇ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ »XXy ö #ÔÔ‡Xy X»¼ ÔÐ h*¸%+ ÐÌâ âòòóóÔ#†¼ »XXy Ã#ÔÔ‡Xy X»¼ ÔÓ  Óà@'' ìàòòò òI.€Factual€Backgroundóóó óˆÐ 4,„'-ý ÐÔ_Ôà  àà ` àOn€September€6,€1998,€Officer€John€Smith€observed€the€appellant€driving€erraticallyÐ ° Ðâ âon€Highway€48/13€in€Montgomery€County.€€The€appellantððs€vehicle€repeatedly€crossed€both€theÐ –æ Ðdouble€yellow€line€and€the€white€line.€€Officer€Smith€attempted€to€stop€the€appellant,€but€theÐ |Ì Ðappellant€continued€to€proceed€west,€weaving€and€crossing€the€center€line.€€After€the€appellant€finallyÐ b² Ðstopped€his€vehicle,€€Officer€Smith€approached€him€and€noticed€the€appellantððs€bloodshot€eyes€andÐ H˜ Ða€strong€smell€of€alcohol€about€the€appellantððs€person.€€The€appellant€moved€unsteadily,€slurred€hisÐ . ~ Ðspeech,€and€only€slowly€followed€Officer€Smithððs€verbal€commands.Ô#†¼ »XXy +#ÔÔ‡Xy X»¼ Ô€€Ô#†¼ »XXy û#ÔÔ€Xy X»¼ ÔMoreover,€the€appellant€failedÐ  d Ðthe€field€sobriety€tests€administered€by€Officer€Smith.€€Officer€Smith€arrested€the€appellant€forÐ ú J Ðdriving€under€the€influence,€and€later€discovered€an€open€can€of€beer€in€the€floorboard€of€theÐ à 0 Ðappellantððs€vehicle.€€Furthermore,€the€appellantððs€driverððs€license€was€in€revoked€status€at€the€timeÐ Æ   Ðof€the€incident.Ð ¬ ü  ÐÌà  àà ` àSubsequently,€the€appellant€pled€guilty€in€the€Montgomery€County€Criminal€CourtÐ xÈ  Ðto€one€count€of€driving€under€the€influence€(hereinafter€ð ðDUIðð),€fourth€offense€or€over,€a€class€EÐ ^®  Ðfelony;€one€count€of€driving€on€a€revoked€license,€sixth€offense,€a€class€A€misdemeanor;€and€oneÐ D”  Ðcount€of€violating€the€open€container€law,€a€class€C€misdemeanor.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€trial€court€sentenced€theÐ *z  Ðappellant€to€two€years€incarceration€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€for€the€DUIÐ ` Ðconviction,€and€imposed€a€$3000€fine.€€The€trial€court€also€sentenced€the€appellant€to€eleven€monthsÐ öF Ðand€twenty„nine€days€incarceration€in€the€Montgomery€County€Jail€for€the€driving€on€a€revokedÐ Ü, Ðlicense€conviction,€and€imposed€a€$350€fine.€The€trial€court€further€sentenced€the€appellant€to€thirtyÐ Â Ðdays€incarceration€in€the€Montgomery€County€Jail€for€the€violation€of€the€open€container€law.€Ð ¨ø ÐAdditionally,€the€trial€court€ordered€the€appellantððs€sentences€to€be€served€concurrently.€€TheÐ ŽÞ Ðappellant€raises€the€following€issues€for€review:€(1)€whether€the€enhancing€factors€applied€by€the€trial€Ð tÄ Ðcourt€were€inapplicable€to€this€case;€and€(2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€the€appellantÐ Zª Ðto€serve€the€full€term€of€his€two„year€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction.€€Ð @ ÐÌà@$ìàòòò òII.€AnalysisˆÐ  \ Ðà  àà ` àóóó óÔ‡Xy XXXy ÔAppellate€review€of€the€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence€is€de€novo.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð òB Ððð€40„35„401(d)€(1997);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894€S.W.2d€301,€304€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994)Ô#†Xy XXXy Ü#ÔÔ‡Xy XXXy Ô.€Ð Ø( ÐThis€court€considers€the€following€factors€in€conducting€its€de€novo€reviewÔ#†Xy XXXy ð#ÔÔ‡Xy XXXy Ô:€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,Ð ¾ Ðreceived€at€the€trial€and€the€sentencing€hearing;€(2)€the€pre„sentence€report;€(3)€the€principles€ofÐ ¤ô Ðsentencing€and€arguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€theÐ Š Ú Ðcriminal€conduct€involved;€(5)€evidence€and€information€offered€by€the€parties€on€enhancement€andÐ p!À  Ðmitigating€factors;€(6)€any€statement€by€the€defendant€in€his€own€behalf;€and€(7)€the€potential€forÐ V"¦! Ðrehabilitation€or€treatment.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102,„103,„210€(1997).€òòSee€alsoóó€òòState€v.Ð <#Œ" ÐFletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€786€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Additionally,€if€the€record€reveals€that€theÐ "$r# Ðtrial€court€adequately€considered€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances,€thisÐ %X $ Ðcourt€will€accord€the€trial€courtððs€determinations€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ î%>!% Ðâ â40„35„401Ô#†Xy XXXy ”#ÔÔ‡Xy XXXy Ô(d);€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€168€(Tenn.€1991)Ô#†Xy XXXy è"#ÔÔ‡Xy XXXy Ô.Ô#†Xy XXXy e##Ôò òòòóóó ó€Ô‡Xy XXXy Ô€Accordingly,€the€burden€is€onÐ Ô&$"& Ðthe€appellant€to€demonstrate€the€impropriety€of€his€sentence(s).€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401,Ð ° ÐSentencing€Commission€Comments.Ô#†Xy XXXy µ##ÔÐ –æ Ðâ âÌà@ˆˆìàA.€Improper€Enhancement€FactorsˆÐ b² Ðà  àà ` àThe€appellant€alleges€that€the€enhancement€factors€applied€by€the€trial€court€wereÐ H˜ Ðinapplicable€in€this€case.€€However,€in€his€brief,€the€appellant€failed€to€make€any€argument€or€citeÐ . ~ Ðto€any€authority€in€support€of€his€contention.€€Therefore,€the€appellant€waives€this€issue.€€Tenn.€R.Ð  d ÐApp.€P.€27(a)(7),€Tenn.€R.€Ct.€Crim.€App.€10€(b);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Dickersonóó,€885€S.W.2d€90,€93Ð ú J Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€Ð à 0 ÐÌà  àà ` àRegardless€of€the€waiver,€the€record€reveals€that€the€trial€court€correctly€applied€twoÐ ¬ ü  Ðenhancement€factors€to€the€appellant:€(1)€the€appellant€has€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictionsÐ ’â  Ðor€criminal€behavior€in€addition€to€those€necessary€to€establish€the€appropriate€range,€and€(8)€theÐ xÈ  Ðappellant€has€a€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€a€sentenceÐ ^®  Ðinvolving€release€in€the€community.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1997).€€The€record€reveals€thatÐ D”  Ðthe€appellant€has€been€arrested€fifty„seven€times,€resulting€in€twenty€misdemeanor€convictions€andÐ *z  Ðone€felony€conviction.€€Therefore,€the€trial€court€properly€applied€enhancement€factor€(1)€to€theÐ ` Ðappellant.€€Additionally,€the€appellant€admitted€at€the€sentencing€hearing€that€he€has€previouslyÐ öF Ðviolated€probation.€€Accordingly,€the€trial€court€correctly€applied€enhancement€factor€(8)€to€theÐ Ü, Ðappellant.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ð Â ÐÌà@õõìàB.€€Alternative€SentencesˆÐ ŽÞ Ðà  àà ` àThe€appellant€also€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€him€alternativeÐ tÄ Ðsentencing€and€instead€ordering€him€to€serve€his€entire€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€ofÐ Zª ÐCorrection.€€Initially€we€note€that€although€the€trial€court€has€discretion€in€determining€the€weightÐ @ Ðto€afford€each€enhancement€and€mitigating€factor,€ð ðthe€trial€court€must€preserve€in€the€record€theÐ &v Ðfactors€it€found€to€apply€and€the€specific€findings€of€fact€upon€which€it€applied€the€sentencingÐ  \ Ðprinciples€to€arrive€at€the€sentence.ðð€€òòState€v.€Andersonóó,€985€S.W.2d€9,€19€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€Ð òB ÐIn€the€instant€case,€the€trial€court€stated€that€it€considered€the€sentencing€principles€contained€inÐ Ø( ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103€in€determining€that€the€appellant€is€ineligible€for€alternativeÐ ¾ Ðsentencing.€€However,€the€trial€court€did€not€specifically€say€how€the€sentencing€principles€apply€toÐ ¤ô Ðthis€appellant.€€Accordingly,€we€are€unable€to€determine€if€the€trial€court€correctly€applied€theÐ Š Ú Ðsentencing€principles.€€òòSeeóó€òòÔ‡Xy XXXy ÔAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€168.Ô#†Xy XXXy ß0#Ô€Therefore,€we€do€not€afford€the€trial€courtððsÐ p!À  Ðconclusion€with€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€Nevertheless,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ V"¦! Ðcourt.€€€Ð <#Œ" ÐÌà  àà ` àTo€determine€if€the€appellant€is€eligible€for€an€alternative€sentence,€we€must€firstÐ %X $ Ðestablish€if€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€the€statutory€presumption€that€he€is€a€favorable€candidate€forÐ î%>!% Ðalternative€sentencing.€€òòState€v.€Jerniganóó,€929€S.W.2d€391,€395€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€1996).€€Tenn.Ð Ô&$"& ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(1997)€provides€the€guidelines€for€which€offenders€are€to€be€presumedÐ º' #' Ðfavorable€candidates€for€alternative€sentences:€òòóó€Ð  (ð#( Ðà8  à(5)€In€recognition€that€state€prison€capacities€and€the€funds€to€build€and€maintainÐ †)Ö$) Ðthem€are€limited,€convicted€felons€committing€the€most€severe€offenses,€possessingÐ l*¼%* Ðâ âcriminal€histories€evincing€a€clear€disregard€for€the€laws€and€morale€of€society,€andÐ R+¢&+ Ðevincing€a€failure€of€past€efforts€at€rehabilitation€shall€be€given€first€priorityÐ ° Ðregarding€sentencing€involving€incarceration;€andЖæÐ Ð  Ðâ âà8  à(6)€A€defendant€who€does€not€fall€within€the€parameters€of€subdivision€(5)€and€is€anÐ |Ì Ðespecially€mitigated€or€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€class€C,€D€or€E€felony€isÐ b² Ðpresumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€options€in€theÐ H˜ Ðabsence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.€Ð. ~Ð Ð  ÐòòSee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Bonestelóó,€871€S.W.2d€163,€167€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993),€òòoverruled€on€otherÐ  d Ðgrounds€byóó€òòState€v.€Hooperóó,€No.€M1997„00031„SC„R11„CD,€2000€WL€1357520,€at€*6€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð ú J ÐApp.€at€Nashville,€September€21,€2000).€Accordingly,€although€alternatives€to€incarceration€areÐ à 0 Ðencouraged€for€standard€or€mitigated€offenders€who€have€committed€C,€D,€or€E€felonies,€there€is€alsoÐ Æ   Ðan€intent€to€incarcerate€those€offenders€ð ðwhose€criminal€histories€indicate€a€clear€disregard€for€theÐ ¬ ü  Ðlaws€and€morals€of€society€and€a€failure€of€past€efforts€to€rehabilitate.ðð€€òòState€v.€Chrismanóó,€885Ð ’â  ÐS.W.2d€834,€840€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€Ð xÈ  ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€this€case,€the€appellant€was€convicted,€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender,€of€an€EÐ D”  Ðfelony.€€Therefore,€he€meets€the€first€two€criteria€for€a€presumption€of€alternative€sentencing.€Ð *z  ÐHowever,€because€of€the€appellantððs€extensive€criminal€history,€he€clearly€falls€within€the€parametersÐ ` Ðof€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(5).€€Accordingly,€he€is€not€entitled€to€the€presumption€of€being€aÐ öF Ðfavorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Duffóó,€No.€02C01„9307„CR„00152,€1995Ð Ü, ÐWL€390951,€at€*4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,€June€28,€1995);€òòState€v.€Christianóó,€No.€01C01„Ð Â Ð9708„CC„0035,€1998€WL€531850,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€August€25,1998).Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àà ` àRegardless,€even€if€the€appellant€could€be€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€forÐ tÄ Ðalternative€sentencing,€this€court€has€observed€that€ð ð[t]he€presumption€can€be€successfully€rebuttedÐ Zª Ðby€facts€contained€in€the€presentence€report,€evidence€presented€by€the€State,€the€testimony€of€theÐ @ Ðaccused€or€a€defense€witness,€or€any€other€source€provided€it€is€made€a€part€of€the€record.ðð€€òòBonestelóó,Ð &v Ð871€S.W.2d€at€167.òòóó€Specifically,€the€following€sentencing€principles€can€constitute€ð ðevidence€to€theÐ  \ Ðcontraryðð€to€rebut€the€presumption€in€favor€of€alternative€sentencing:Ð òB Ðà8  à€(A)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restraining€an€[appellant]€whoÐ Ø( Ðhas€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;оРР Ðà8  à(B)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense€orÐ ¤ô Ðconfinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrence€to€others€likelyÐ Š Ú Ðto€commit€similar€offenses;€or€Ðp!À Ð Ð  Ðà8  à(C)€Measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€or€recently€beenÐ V"¦! Ðapplied€unsuccessfully€to€the€[appellant].Ð<#Œ"Ð Ð  ÐòòóóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(1997)òòóó;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169;€òòState€v.€Binghamóó,€910Ð "$r# ÐS.W.2d€448,€454€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995),€òòoverruled€on€other€grounds€byóó€òòState€v.€Hooperóó,€No.Ð %X $ ÐM1997„00031„SC„R11„CD,€2000€WL€1357520,€at€*6€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€SeptemberÐ î%>!% Ð21,€2000).Ð Ô&$"& ÐÌà  àà ` àAs€we€stated€earlier,€the€presentence€report€reveals€that€the€appellant€has€been€arrestedÐ  (ð#( Ðfifty„seven€times,€and€has€been€convicted€of€twenty€misdemeanors€and€one€felony.€€This€indicatesÐ †)Ö$) Ða€long€history€of€criminal€conduct.€€òòSeeóó€òòFletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€at€787;€òòState€v.€Holtóó,€No.€02C01„9809„Ð l*¼%* ÐCC„00272,€1999€WL€148087,€at€*3€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,€March€19,€1999).€€Moreover,€theÐ R+¢&+ Ðappellant€has€received€suspended€sentences€in€the€past€and€has€nevertheless€continued€to€violate€theÐ 8,ˆ', Ðlaw,€suggesting€that€measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€or€recently€beenÐ ° Ðapplied€unsuccessfully€to€the€appellant.€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Lillyóó,€No.€03C01„9505„CR„00143,€1996€WLÐ –æ Ð87441,€at€*4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€March€1,€1996);€òòState€v.€Sweatóó,€No.€03C01„9708„CC„Ð |Ì Ð0348,€1998€WL€707797,€at€*3€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€October€12,€1998).€€This€constitutesÐ b² Ðsufficient€ð ðevidence€to€the€contraryðð€to€deny€the€appellant€an€alternative€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.Ð H˜ ÐDavis,óó€No.€03C01„9710„CR„00433,€1998€WL€743649,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,Ð . ~ ÐOctober€15,€1998),€òòperm.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1999).€Ð  d ÐÌÔ‡ôadòXXy Ôà  àà ` àAlÔ#†Xy XòôadíJ#Ôthough€the€appellant€did€not€raise€the€issue€in€his€brief,€we€note€the€trial€courtÐ à 0 Ðincorrectly€sentenced€the€appellant€to€thirty€days€incarceration€in€the€Montgomery€County€Jail€forÐ Æ   Ðviolating€the€open€container€law.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„416(b)(1)(1997)€states€that€ð ð[a]€violationÐ ¬ ü  Ðof€this€section€is€a€class€C€misdemeanor,€punishable€by€fine€only.ðð€€Therefore,€the€trial€court€had€noÐ ’â  Ðauthority€to€sentence€the€appellant€to€incarceration€for€a€violation€of€the€open€container€law.€Ð xÈ  ÐAccordingly,€we€vacate€the€appellantððs€sentence€of€incarceration€for€the€violation€of€Tenn.€CodeÐ ^®  ÐAnn.€ðð€55„10„416(a)(1).€€òòState€v.€Youngóó,€No.€M1998„00402„CCA„R3„CD,€1999€WL€117954,€at€*9Ð D”  Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€December€15,€1999),€òòperm.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€2000).Ð *z  ÐÌà@ff#ìàòòò òIII.€ConclusionˆÐ öF Ðà  àà ` àóóó óBased€upon€the€foregoing,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€alternative€sentencing,Ð Ü, Ðbut€we€vacate€the€appellantððs€sentence€of€incarceration€for€the€violation€of€the€open€container€law.€Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` àÌà8  àÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` àÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð Ø( Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNORMA€McGEE€OGLE,€JUDGE