WPC >Z]Xp 6J66y_:ʮɸ "a V'M-J{^s|e{ΓS1,ȭy: +꣘p'kᕍ]iO+$u ٥-HTgdɑ .%ʓ=%&#/6Ɇ6| :I[mLweƨa0cQ?2[ɧ& y&n!h(IB935NA@̂Vfa ;VgLN9U.&3q<D@IS5ͤz^#љJ=T87ATxI9 \KIȏ['* 12'd _ S/ܳ{{YY޾ZVW뮞{}F` -ׁj^Z!w50r@/pR,(Pӛ^,-Tvpu[G?\b %\^ b 0nUNwD4H\ zk m U@ #   ] #NEb 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K   AST 0m 0D AU&|) (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularjW) 3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU(9 Z(Times New Roman HP LaserJet 4,,,,,,0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - -(|G2q$$ !.8dd8         0    d(|39$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|39$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _   8XXdd8@ttINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE# #Ԉ ,   SEPTEMBER13,2000Session X XX #XX#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.JOSHUADAILEYXX   ` @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Blount_ԀCounty  h @@Nos.C11650,C11651D.KellyThomas,Judge  X @@*AV) ` dE<` A (  @@TTNo.E199901342CCAR3CD '  November28,_2000_   AV) ` dE<` A      TheDefendant,JoshuaDailey,pledguiltytotwocountsoftheClassEfelonyoffenseof  violationoftheHabitualMotorVehicleOffenderAct.ThetrialcourtsentencedDefendantto  twoyearsforeachconviction,tobeservedconsecutively.Furthermore,thetrialcourtordered v thefirstsentencetobeservedinsplitconfinement,with300daysincarcerationinthecountyjail f followedbyplacementinCommunityCorrections.TheDefendantappeals,challengingthe V lengthofthetotaleffectivesentenceandarguingthatheshouldservetheentiresentencein F CommunityCorrections.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.#XXo#XX 6    Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed #XX#XX f   #XXө#XXThomasT._Woodall_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichGaryR.Wade,_P.J._,and F DavidG.Hayes,J.,joined.#XX #XX 6 ShawnG.Graham,_Maryville_,Tennessee,AssistantDistrictPublicDefender,fortheappellant,   JoshuaDailey. !  JohnBobo,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral;andR.Stephen_Jobe_,AssistantDistrictAttorney #" General,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. $#   #XX, #XX@55' OPINION #XX5 #ӈ V'"&  XX  TheDefendant,JoshuaDailey,pledguiltytotwoseparatecountsofviolationofthe 6)$( HabitualMotorVehicleOffenderAct( _HMVO_).TheStateandtheDefendantagreedthatthe &*v%) trialcourtwoulddeterminethelengthandmannerofserviceofthesentencesatasubsequent +f&* sentencinghearing.ThetrialcourtsentencedDefendanttotwoyearsforeachoftheClassE ,V'+ felonyconvictionsasaRangeIStandardOffender.Thetrialjudgefurtherorderedthesentences ,F(, tobeservedconsecutivelytoeachother,andconsecutivelytoKnoxCountysentencesforwhich -6)-6 _theDefendantwasonprobationatthetimeofthecommissionoftheBlountCountyHMVO  offenses.    OneoffenseinthecasesubjudiceoccurredonFebruary4,1999andtheotheroccurred  onApril3,1999.Inthefirstsentence,theBlountCountyCircuitCourtorderedDefendantto p serve300daysinthecountyjail,withthebalanceofthesentenceservedinCommunity `  Corrections.Thetrialcourtorderedtheentiresentencefortheotherconsecutivesentencetobe P  servedinCommunityCorrections.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035501(a)(2)and(3)(Supp. @  1999). 0    InhisappealtothisCourt,Defendantassertsthatthetotallengthoftheeffectivesentence `  giventohimshouldbereducedtothreeyearsandthatalloftheeffectivesentenceshouldbe P  servedinCommunityCorrections.Therefore,Defendantarguesthathistotaleffectivesentence, @  oncereduced,shouldbeservedwithnoconfinementinthecountyjail. 0    Whenadefendantmakesachallengetothelength,range,ormannerofserviceofa  sentence,thisCourtconductsadenovoreviewoftherecordwithapresumptionthatthe  determinationsmadebythetrialcourtarecorrect.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.40-35-401(d)(1997).   Xt XXXWeconditionthispresumptionuponanaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialjudge  consideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Ashby, | 823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Failureofthetrialcourttocomplywiththestatutory h directivesremovesthepresumptionofcorrectnessandourreviewisdenovo.Statev.Poole, T 945S.W.2d93,96(Tenn.1997).#XX X Xt#Inconductingourreview,wemustconsideralltheevidence, @ thepresentencereport,thesentencingprinciples,theenhancingandmitigatingfactors,arguments @ ofcounsel,thedefendantsstatements,thenatureandcharacteroftheoffenseandthe 0 defendantspotentialforrehabilitation.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103(5),210(b)(1997&  p Supp.1999);Ashby,823S.W.2dat169."Theburdenofshowingthatthesentenceisimproperis ` upontheappellant."Ashby,823S.W.2dat169.Thepresumptionofcorrectnessappliesinthis P case. @   Insettingthelengthofthesentences,thetrialcourtfoundenhancementfactors(1)   (Defendantspriorcriminalrecord)and(8)(Defendanthasaprevioushistoryofunwillingnessto ! complywiththeconditionsofasentenceinvolvingreleaseinthecommunity).SeeTenn.Code "  Ann.4035114(1)and(8)(1997).TheDefendantadmitsthesefactorsareapplicable,andthat #! thetrialcourtshouldincreasehissentencesabovetheminimumsentenceimposedbylaw.He $" argues,however,thatthesentencesshouldbemitigatedbecause:(1)allhispriorconvictions, % # exceptone,areformisdemeanors;(2)allbutonearemorethantwoyearsold;and(3)thetrial p&!$ courtfoundonlytwooftwentypossiblestatutoryenhancementfactors. `'"%   TherecordonappealreflectsthatDefendanthadsixpriorconvictionsforDUI,three @)$' priorconvictionsforpublicintoxication,twopriorconvictionsfordrivingonarevokedlicense, 0*%( andtwopriorfelonyconvictionsforviolationoftheHMVOActin1998(foroffensesoccurring  +p&) inJanuaryandFebruary1997).TherecordfurthershowsthatwhileonprobationforaDUI ,`'* convictionin1986hecommittedanotherDUI,andwhileonprobationforanotherDUI  convictionin1994,hecommittedanotherDUIandwasalsochargedwithdrivingonarevoked  license.    Thetrialcourtplacedgreatweightupontheenhancementfactorsthatwerefound p applicable.Underthefactsofthiscase,wefindthatthetrialcourtdidnoterrbysettingthe `  sentenceforeachoffenseattwoyears.AsDefendantwasonbondforthefelonyoffenseof P  violationoftheHMVOActwhenhecommittedthesameoffenseagainonApril3,1999,thelaw @  requiresthesentencestobeservedconsecutively.Tenn.R.Crim.P.32(c)(3)(C). 0    RegardingDefendantsargumentthatthetotalsentenceshouldbeservedentirelyinthe `  CommunityCorrectionsprogram,withnoincarceration,wenotethatthosewhopossesscriminal P  historiesevincingacleardisregardforthelawsofsociety,andthosewhoevincefailureofpast @  effortsatrehabilitation,aregivenpriorityregardingincarceration.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035 0  102(5)(1997).Furthermore,asfoundbythetrialcourt,asentenceinvolvingincarcerationcan   bebaseduponthefactthatmeasureslessrestrictivethanconfinementhavefrequentlyorrecently  beenappliedunsuccessfullytothedefendant.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103(1)(C)(1997).In  addition,confinementisjustifiedwheneversocietyshouldbeprotectedbyrestraininga  defendantwhohasalonghistoryofcriminalconduct.Defendantwasfortyfouryearsoldatthe  timeofsentencing,andhiscriminalconduct,outlinedabove,beganwhenhewasthirtyoneyears  old.Accordingly,thetrialcourtdidnoterrbyordering300daysconfinementinthecountyjail. p   CONCLUSION 0 @  P  0 @   0  Havingfoundnoerror,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.0(#(#       `     h     ___________________________________ !    `     h     THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGE