ÿWPC½ 0{ßL±·ºAݶ¥Bhž‡Z>q÷÷„_í[ñ… =f"`Ù„–Nʈ¾ä©Ò¥ƒkIØ×v{ÿ2e×]+.ãŒ^©Ç Hõ[€FõsçþÚ=¸Ž|ë_þd—n É5A¦° Æ IÑA²˜Qïëß‹A÷¥‘”Õ×K%œI:×uÝîû“Êž¶Uhï9ÅKºâpºç§Ê;ò1ûdâwè}’X¹æ™Ç?úÚ«1«¦ñçp)ˆDdÞèÍÙLæ-{K:luŠðéá~3ΊØlÊ`…!R¼^Ä´H{rCC¿_2‘2TÈÍ@æH®±ÛÞ$/vC{™œö·R1×3‚Órù =‘üÅ'nÃjž×§ Ã’“ª¤XTäŽK¾hïN}ý‰Hr¶™\.jyE‚æý¾×¬kTËœýwƒurÙ™i%ÝQ·’²€ëv0F¨|Ôr“ÖùFdNíWI¼iâBõa‹×Q!Mû_K×Û¤h›&áß&‚×À…UBF %ˆ U.Ž ¼ nXÌ 0P$ 4t ˆ 0” 0D$ w@h U:¨ êâ U:Ì êU:ðZ******************* B„„„„„„ D3¡¡¡ 0DÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔ AOÆgg 0D- D/q B <þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpi X%ä2¼A`ArialTT3|X«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@%ä2¼A`ArialTTt10cpiXXXä2¼P±ŠQXP((­À$¡¡ÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓuM%(D(3¾Á$¤¤Ý ƒ­À!ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó DD[ D D Ó€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular àÔ€X4¨XX XÔÔ€XX4¨ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X4¨XÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€30,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular àÔ€X4¨XX XÔÔ€XX4¨ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X4¨XÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€29,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular PÝ ƒ ¾Á$ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€ ôæôX XÔ€€This€Court€has€held€those€offenses€that€occurred€after€November€1,€1989,€are€to€be€governedÐ `  Ðby€our€Supreme€Courtððs€ruling€in€òòState€v.€Hillóó,€954€S.W.2d€725€(Tenn.€1997).€€òòSeeóó€€òòOrren€v.€Carltonóó,€No.Ð  ¾ Ð03C01„9704„CR„00141(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€filed€Feb.€13,€1998);€òòBarrett€v.€Comptonóó,€No.Ð Ü | Ð02C01„9612„CC„00462€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,€filed€April€9,€1997). d$$$$'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ­À!ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓÝ  Ýñ ñ›ñ ñÑ` °ÑÑX°ÑÑ7€9XXdÈdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑTR[  AØ'Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€X ‡XX XÔñññ ñßr€ *<,(j 8` `€€@EÒf ` 8ttxP ` ð  rßñ ñññññßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@EÒf ` 8ttxP ` ð  rßñññ ñ›ñ ñà œ àà ô àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@cc:;àAT€NASHVILLEˆÌÌà@¿¿7;àAUGUST€1998€SESSIONˆÌÌÌÌó óÌò òCARL€EUGENE€JORDAN,à ü àà T à)ó óÐ Ðp  Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àò ò)ó óà ¬ àò òC.C.A.€NO.€01C01„9711„CR„00528ó óÐ À`  Ðà œ àà ô àAppellant,à ¤ àò ò€€€€€à ü àà T à)Ð °P  Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T à)à ¬ àDAVIDSON€COUNTYó óÐ  @  ÐVS.à œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àò ò)Ð 0  Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T à)à ¬ àHON.€SETH€NORMAN,Ð €  ÐSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à ¤ àà ü àà T à)à ¬ àJUDGEÐ p Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T à)Ìà œ àà ô àó óAppellee.ò òà ¤ àà ü àà T à)à ¬ àó ó(Post„Conviction€&€Petition€for€Ð Pð Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àHabeas€Corpus€Relief)ò òÐ @à Ðó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANT:óóà ¤ àà ü àà T à€€€€€òòà ¬ àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:óóÐ   Ðà œ àÌÌò òCARL€EUGENE€JORDAN,€Pro€Seà T àà ¬ àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÐ Ð p Ðó óà œ à(On€Appeal)à L àà ¤ àà ü àò òà T àà ¬ àó óAttorney€General€&€Reporterò òÐ À!` ÐÌDEANNA€BELL„JOHNSONó óà ü àà T àà ¬ àò òLISA€A.€NAYLORó óÐ  #@ Ð211€Third€Ave.,€Northà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àAsst.€Attorney€Generalà ! àÐ $0 ÐNashville,€TN€€37201ò òà ¤ àà ü àà T àó óà ¬ à425€Fifth€Ave.,€Northò òà ! àÐ €%  Ðó óà œ à(At€Hearing)à L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àNashville,€TN€€37243Ð p& Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àÌ€€à œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àò òVICTOR€S.€JOHNSON,€IIIó óÐ P(ð! Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àò òSTEVE€DOZIERó óÐ  +À!$ Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àWashington€Square€Bldg.,€Suite€500Ìà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ à222€Second€Ave.,€NorthÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àNashville,€TN€€37201„1649ÌÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àà  àÌÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àÌOPINION€FILED:òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ €4 +. ÐÌÌÌò òAFFIRMEDó óÐ @8à.2 ÐÌÌò òJOHN€H.€PEAY,ó óÐ ;°15 ÐJudgeÌÐ  ð<37Ç ÐѰXÑÓ  Óà@‡‡:;àò òòòÔ‡¼¼XX ‡ÔO€P€I€N€I€O€NÔ#†X ‡X¼¼#ԈР`  ÐÌÌó óóóÌÓÓà œ àà ô àOn€January€23,€1981,€the€petitioner€pled€guilty€to€aggravated€rape,€armedÏrobbery,€and€second„degree€murder.€€He€was€then€sentenced€to€three€concurrent€fortyÏyear€sentences.€€On€May€2,€1986,€this€Court€granted€the€petitioner€post„conviction€reliefÏand€vacated€the€guilty€plea€on€a€finding€that€the€trial€court€had€failed€to€fully€comply€withÏrequired€procedure€in€a€determination€of€whether€the€guilty€plea€was€made€knowingly€andÏvoluntarily.€€òòState€v.€Jordanóó,€No.€85„265„111(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€May€2,€1986).Ð ¦F  ÐÌà œ àà ô àOn€September€23,€1986,€the€petitioner€again€pled€guilty€to€aggravated€rape,Ïarmed€robbery,€and€second„degree€murder€and€was€sentenced€to€three€concurrent€thirty„¼five€year€sentences€pursuant€to€a€plea€bargain€agreement.€€On€May€5,€1996,€theÏpetitioner€filed€a€second€post„conviction€petition€alleging€ineffective€assistance€of€counselÏand€ex€post€facto€application€of€a€sentencing€law.€€The€petition€further€alleged€that€theÏpetitionerððs€plea€to€second„degree€murder€was€not€knowing€and€his€plea€to€aggravatedÏrape€was€involuntary€and€unknowing.€€The€petitioner€amended€this€petition€on€DecemberÏ11,€1996,€alleging€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€on€the€grounds€that€petitionerððsÏcounsel€failed€to€inform€him€that€he€could€choose€between€two€different€sentencing€lawsÏand€further€alleging€that€the€State€failed€to€file€notice€of€its€intent€to€seek€enhancementÏof€the€punishment€.€€œIn›€œDecember€of›€œ1996,›€the€petitioner€filed€a€œpetition€for€writ›€œof›€habeasÏcorpus€alleging€that€the€indictments€for€aggravated€rape,€murder,€and€armed€robberyÏwere€fatally€defective€and€obtained€upon€void€and€defective€affidavits€of€complaints€andÏwarrants.€€Lastly,€on€March€24,€1997,€the€petitioner€filed€a€motion€to€amend€and€add€toÏhis€original€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€This€motion€moved€to€strike€and€expungeÏfrom€the€original€petition€the€grounds€of€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€and€œofÏunknowing›€and€œinvoluntary›€guilty€plea.€€The€motion€also€added€the€allegation€that€theÏpetitionerððs€sentence€is€void€on€the€grounds€that€the€State€did€not€abide€by€the€terms€ofÐ F:æ04 Ðthe€plea€agreement.€€Upon€the€Stateððs€motion,€the€trial€court€dismissed€petitionerððsÐ :¾06 Ðpetition€for€post„conviction€relief€and€writ€of€habeas€corpus.€€The€petitioner€now€appealsÏand€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€dismissed€his€petition€for€post„convictionÏrelief€and€writ€of€habeas€corpus.€€We€disagree€and€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€courtÏbelow.ÌÌà œ àà ô àWhen€petitioner€pled€guilty€on€September€23,€1986,€a€three€year€statute€ofÏlimitations€was€in€effect€regarding€post„conviction€petitions.€€T.C.A.€ðð€40„30„102€(repealedÏ1995).€€This€statute€of€limitations€started€to€run€when€the€judgment€against€the€petitionerÏbecame€final€in€October€of€1986.€€òòState€v.€Mooreóó,€814€S.W.2d€381,€382€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð À` ÐApp.€1991).€€As€the€petitionerððs€post„conviction€petition€was€filed€after€October€1989,€theÏstatute€of€limitations€had€run€and€his€petition€is€barred.€€ÌÌà œ àà ô àPetitioner€argues€that€his€petition€is€not€barred€by€the€statute€of€limitationsÏbecause€it€is€a€motion€to€reopen€his€prior€post„conviction€petition€filed€on€August€17,Ï1984.€€This€argument€is€without€merit.€€A€petitioner€may€file€a€motion€to€reopen€the€firstÏpost„conviction€petition€but€only€in€the€limited€circumstances€set€out€in€€T.C.A.€ðð€40„30„¼217€(1997).€€€The€petitioner€has€alleged€nothing€that€would€bring€his€petition€within€thoseÏlimited€circumstances€entitling€him€to€reopen€his€first€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.ÌÌà œ àà ô àPetitioner€also€appeals€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€his€writ€of€habeas€corpusÏin€which€petitioner€alleges€the€indictments€were€fatally€defective.€€This€argument€isÏwithout€merit€as€it€has€been€waived.€€It€is€the€duty€of€the€appellant€to€prepare€a€record€thatÏconveys€a€fair,€accurate€and€complete€account€of€what€transcribed€in€the€trial€court€withÏrespect€to€the€issues€which€form€the€basis€of€the€appeal.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b).€€InÏaddition,€this€Court€has€held€that€an€appellate€court€cannot€consider€an€issue€which€is€notÏpreserved€in€the€record€for€review.€€òòState€v.€Banesóó,€874€S.W.2d€73,€82€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð L6ì,2 Ð1994).€€As€the€petitioner€did€not€include€the€indictments€in€the€record,€any€complaintsÏpertaining€to€those€indictments€are€waived.Ð ä9„06 Їà œ àà ô àFurthermore,€œeven€if›€the€indictments€had€been€included€in€the€œrecord,›€theÏpetitionerððs€arguments€would€still€fail.€€Habeas€corpus€relief€is€only€available€when€aÏconviction€is€void€because€the€convicting€court€was€without€jurisdiction€or€authority€toÏsentence€the€petitioner€or€petitionerððs€sentence€has€expired.€€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2dÐ Äd Ð157,€164€(Tenn.€1993).€€Petitioner€contends€the€indictments€are€fatally€defective€becauseÏthey€did€not€contain€the€requisite€mens€rea€depriving€the€trial€court€of€jurisdiction.€ÏAlthough€this€is€a€proper€basis€for€a€writ€of€habeas€corpus,€the€petitioner€has€allegedÏnothing€that€would€entitle€him€to€habeas€corpus€relief.€€ÌÌà œ àà ô àIn€determining€whether€an€indictment€is€sufficient,€it€must€first€beÏdetermined€whether€the€crime€occurred€under€the€old€or€the€new€criminal€code.€€In€theÏpresent€case€the€petitionerððs€offense€occurred€in€1981,€well€before€the€enactment€of€theÏnew€criminal€code€on€November€1,€1989.œ×ƒ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›€€Since€the€indictments€challenged€by€petitionerÐ ð Ðwere€returned€under€the€old€criminal€code,€the€prevailing€law€at€that€time€governs€thisÏcase.€€When€petitioner€was€indicted€in€1981,€Tennessee€law€œrequired€the€following:›ÌÓÓà œ àà ô à[t]he€indictment€must€state€the€facts€constituting€the€offenseÌà œ àà ô àin€ordinary€and€concise€language,€without€prolixity€or€repetition,€Ìà œ àà ô àin€such€a€manner€as€to€enable€a€person€of€common€understanding€Ìà œ àà ô àto€know€what€is€intended,€and€with€that€degree€of€certainty€which€Ìà œ àà ô àwill€enable€the€court,€on€conviction,€to€pronounce€the€properÌÓv'Óà œ àà ô à€judgment€.€.€œ.€.›ÌT.C.A.ðð€40„1802€(now€codified€at€œ€ðð€40„13„202).›€€In€addition,€the€Tennessee€SupremeÏCourt€œreviewed›€such€statute€and€held€that€recitation€of€the€statutory€language€regardingÏthe€offense€charged€gives€rise€to€the€presumption€that€the€indictment€sufficiently€apprisesÏthe€defendant€of€the€mental€element€required.€€òòCampbell€v.€Stateóó,€491€S.W.2d€359,€361Ð 0¢&+ Ð(Tenn.€1973).ÌÌà œ àà ô àThe€first„degree€murder€indictment€of€the€petitioner,€assuming€his€brief€isÐ f5,1 Ðcorrect€as€that€is€the€only€recitation€of€the€indictment€in€the€record,€chargesÌÓÓà œ àà ô àCarl€Eugene€Jordan€a/k/a€Carl€hadley€[sic]€heretofore€to€wit,€Ìà œ àà ô àon€the€11€[sic]€day€of€July,€1980€and€prior€to€the€date€of€this€Ìà œ àà ô àindictment€with€force€and€arms,€in€the€custody€aforesaid,€Ìà œ àà ô àunlawfully,€feloniously,€willfully,€deliberately,€maliciously,Ìà œ àà ô àand€in€the€perpetration€of€or€attempt€to€perpetrate€a€bulgrary,Ì€à œ àà ô à[sic]€did€make€an€assault€upon€the€body€of€one,€Bobby€H.Ð ªJ Ðà œ àà ô àReeves,€and€.€.€.,€the€said€.€.€.€Carl€Eugene€Jordan€a/k/a€Ìà œ àà ô àCarl€Hadley,€then€and€there€unlawfully,€feloniously,€willfully,€Ìà œ àà ô àdeliberately,€maliciously€and€in€the€prepetration€[sic]€œof€of›€Ìà œ àà ô à[sic]€the€attempt€to€perpetrate€a€burglary,€did€kill€and€murder€Ìà œ àà ô àthe€said€Bobby€H.€Reeves,€in€violation€of€Tennessee€Code€Ìà œ àà ô àAnnotated€ðð39„2402€and€against€the€peace€and€dignity€of€the€Ìà œ àà ô àstate€of€Óà+ÓTennessee.ÌPetitioner€argues€that€because€this€indictment€does€not€include€the€term€ð ðpremeditationððÏit€is€fatally€flawed,€depriving€the€sentencing€court€of€jurisdiction€over€the€petitioner€and€theÏsubject€matter.ÌÌà œ àà ô àThe€statute€under€which€the€petitioner€was€charged€was€T.C.A.€œðð€39„2402›Ï(repealed€1989).€€The€statute€statedÌÓÓà œ àà ô à(a)€Every€murder€perpetrated€by€means€of€poison,€lying€Ìà œ àà ô àin€wait,€or€by€other€kind€of€willful,€deliberate,€malicious,€Ìà œ àà ô àand€premeditated€killing,€or€committed€in€the€perpetration€of,€Ìà œ àà ô àor€attempt€to€perpetrate,€any€murder€in€the€first€degree,€arson,€Ìà œ àà ô àrape,€robbery,€burglary,€larceny,€kidnapping,€aircraft€piracy,€or€Ìà œ àà ô àthe€unlawful€throwing,€placing€or€discharging€of€a€destructive€ÌÓ°1Óà œ àà ô àdevice€or€bomb,€is€murder€in€the€first€degree.ÌT.C.A.€œðð€39„2402›€(repealed€1989).ÌÌà œ àà ô àThe€petitioner€contends€that€since€the€statute€includes€the€termÏð ðpremeditationðð,€it€is€an€element€of€the€offense€and€must€be€alleged€in€the€indictment.€ÏThis€contention€is€without€merit.€€Premeditation€is€not€an€element€of€first„degree€murderÏwhere€felony€murder€is€being€charged.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Hopperóó,€695€S.W.2d€530,€535Ð ´2T). Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1985).€€In€the€petitionerððs€case,€the€murder€occurred€during€theÏcommission€of€a€robbery€and€a€rape,€therefore€constituting€felony€murder.€€€AsÏpremeditation€is€not€an€element€of€first„degree€murder€when€such€murder€occurs€duringÏthe€commission€of€a€robbery€or€a€rape,€it€was€not€necessary€to€include€the€termÐ ä9„06 Ðpremeditation€in€the€indictment€against€the€petitioner.ÌÌà œ àà ô àThe€petitioner€also€contends€that€the€indictment€charging€him€with€Ïaggravated€rape€was€fatally€defective€because€it€contained€language€of€a€factual€contentÏwholly€different€and€inconsistent€with€the€ensuing€circumstances€as€they€related€to€theÏevents€that€unfolded€during€the€alleged€offense.€€The€aggravated€rape€indictment,Ïaccording€to€petitionerððs€brief,€reads:ÌÓÓà œ àà ô àCarl€Eugene€Jordan€a/k/a€Carl€Hadley€.€.€.€on€the€day€Ìà œ àà ô àand€year€aforesaid€.€.€.€unlawfully,€forcibly€or€with€the€Ìà œ àà ô àuse€of€coercision€[sic]€did€sexually€penetrate€one€Fredia€Ìà œ àà ô àReeves€.€.€.€€the€said€Lewis€Eugene€Cobitt€[sic]€and€Carl€Ìà œ àà ô àEugene€Jordan€a/k/a€Carl€Hadley€Aiding€or€Abetting€each€Ìà œ àà ô àother€in/the€[sic]€act€of€said€sexual€penetration€and€while€Ìà œ àà ô àthe€said€Lewis€Eugene€Corbitt€and/or€Carl€Eugene€Jordan€Ìà œ àà ô àa/k/a€Carl€Eugene€Hadley€were€armed€with€a€deadly€ÌÓö8ÓÓÓà œ àà ô àweapon,€to€wit,€a€pistol€.€.€.ÌÌÌÌÓÓà œ àà ô àThe€petitioner€argues€that€since€the€ð ðrecord€is€absolutely€barren€ofÏevidence,€of€any€kind,€depicting€the€necessary€elements€needed€for€supporting€anÏœññindictment€ññof€ñ ñ[sic]ñ ññ ñ›€ñ ñððAiding›€and€Abettingðððð€the€indictment€is€fatally€defective.€€The€petitioner€wasÏindicted€under€œT.C.A.€ðð›€39„3703€(repealed€œ1989),›€which€œstates:›ÌÓÓà œ àà ô à(a)€Aggravated€rape€is€unlawful€sexual€penetration€of€another€Ìà œ àà ô àaccompanied€by€any€of€the€following€circumstances:Ìà œ àà ô à(1)€Force€or€coercion€is€used€to€accomplish€the€act€and€the€Ìà œ àà ô àdefendant€is€armed€with€a€weapon€or€any€article€used€or€Ìà œ àà ô àfashioned€in€a€manner€to€lead€the€victim€reasonably€to€believe€Ìà œ àà ô àit€to€be€a€weapon;Ìà œ àà ô à(2)€The€defendant€causes€personal€injury€to€the€victim;Ìà œ àà ô à(3)€The€defendant€is€aided€or€abetted€by€one€or€more€other€Ìà œ àà ô àpersons;€and€Ìà œ àà ô àà L à(A)€Force€or€coercion€is€used€to€accomplish€the€actÌœÌT.C.A.›€œðð€39„3703›€(repealed€1989).ÌÌÌÌÓÓà œ àà ô àPetitioner€was€also€indicted€under€T.C.A.€œðð€39„109›€(repealed€œ1989),›€as€anÏaider€and€abettor.€€Such€statute€states€that€ð ð[a]ll€persons€present,€aiding€and€abetting,€orÏready€and€consenting€to€aid€and€abet,€in€any€criminal€offense,€shall€be€deemed€principalÐ þ8ž/5 Ðoffenders,€and€punished€as€such.ðð€€T.C.A.€œðð€39„109›€(repealed€1989).€€PetitionerððsÏcontention€is€that€there€is€not€enough€evidence€in€the€record€to€convict€him€as€an€aiderÏand€abettor.€€It€is€well„settled€law€that€habeas€corpus€and€post„conviction€proceedings€areÏnot€available€to€test€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€at€the€original€trial,€nor€to€inquire€intoÏor€determine€the€question€of€guilt€or€innocence,€nor€to€test€the€competency€orÏincompetency€of€original€trial€witnesses.€€òòShepherd€v.€Stateóó,€533€S.W.2d€335,€338€(Tenn.Ð \ü  ÐCrim.€App.€1975);€œñðñòòsee›€›alsoóó,ñðññòññññUññññòññóñòòñóññõññôñSñôññõññöñsee€alsoóóñöññöññóñóóñóññöñ›€òòMyers€v.€Stateóó,€462€S.W.2d€265,€267€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð (È  Ð1970).€€Therefore,€petitionerððs€contention€that€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€support€aÏconviction€for€aggravated€rape€is€not€a€proper€basis€for€post„conviction€relief.Ìà œ àà ô àÌà œ àà ô àThe€petitioner€further€contends€that€the€indictment€charging€petitioner€withÏaggravated€rape€failed€to€recite€explicitly€the€facts€which€constituted€the€alleged€crime.€ÏAccording€to€the€petitioner,€this€failure€renders€the€indictment€fatally€defective.€€ThisÏcontention€is€without€merit.€€The€indictment€charging€petitioner€with€aggravated€rapeÏstated€the€facts€constituting€aggravated€rape€in€ordinary€language€such€that€a€person€ofÏcommon€understanding€would€know€the€crime€charged€and€with€enough€certainty€toÏenable€a€court€to€pronounce€proper€judgment€upon€conviction.€€As€such,€the€indictmentÏwas€sufficient€under€the€applicable€statutory€standard.€€œñøñòòñøññùñSeeóóñùññùññøñóóñøñ›ñùññ÷ñòòSeeóó,ñ÷ñ›€T.C.A.€œððñúñ€ñúñ40„1802›€(nowÐ ì'Œ" Ðcodified€at€œñûñðð€ñûñ40„13„202).›ÌÌà œ àà ô àPetitioner€also€challenges€the€indictment€charging€him€with€armed€robbery.€ÏPetitioner€alleges€the€indictment€is€fatally€defective€and€should€be€set€aside€because€itÏdoes€not€include€the€term€ð ðforcible.ðð€€The€indictment€charging€petitioner€with€armedÏrobbery€is€set€out€in€petitionerððs€Reply€Brief€and€œstatesñüñ,ñüñ›œñýñ:ñýñ›ÌÓÓà œ àà ô àOn€the€11€day€of€July,€1980,€in€the€County€aforesaid,€that€Ìà œ àà ô à(he),€has€probably€[sic]€cause€to€believe€that€Carl€Hadley€Ìà œ àà ô àa/k/a€Carl€Eugene€Jordan€unlawfully€and€feloniously€did€Ìà œ àà ô àmake€an€assault€upon€the€body€of€one€Freda€M.€Reeves,€Ìà œ àà ô àand€did€then€and€there€unlawfully€and€feloniuosly€[sic]€put€Ìà œ àà ô à(her)€in€fear€and€danger€of€(her)€life,€and€then€and€there€Ìà œ àà ô àunlawfully,€feloniuosly,€[sic]€and€violently€did€steal,€take,€Ð ä9„06 Ðà œ àà ô àand€carry€away€from€the€person€and€against€the€will€of€the€Ìà œ àà ô àsaid€Freda€M.€Reeves€certain€personal€property,€to€wit,€Ìà œ àà ô àapproximately€$15.00€in€foo€[sic]€stamps€of€the€value€of€Ìà œ àà ô à$15.00€the€personal€property€of€the€said€Freda€M.€Reeves,€Ìà œ àà ô àsaid€robbery€being€accomplished€by€the€use€of€a€deadly€Ìà œ àà ô àweapon,€to€wit,€a€pistol€.€.€œ.ñþñ€.ñþñ›ÌÌÌÌÓÓà œ àà ô àIn€order€to€determine€the€sufficiency€of€this€indictment€it€is€necessary€toÏreview€the€statute€under€which€petitioner€was€indicted.€€Petitioner€was€indicted€underÏT.C.A.€œððñÿñ€ñÿñ39„3901›€(repealed€œ1989)ññ,ññ›€which€œstatesññ:ññ›ÌÓÓà œ àà ô à(a)€Robbery€is€the€felonious€and€forcible€taking€from€the€person€Ìà œ àà ô àof€another,€goods€or€money€of€any€value,€by€violence€or€putting€Ìà œ àà ô àthe€person€in€fear.€€Every€person€convicted€of€the€crime€of€robbery€Ìà œ àà ô àshall€be€imprisoned€in€the€penitentiary€not€less€than€five€(5)€nor€Ìà œ àà ô àmore€than€fifteen€(15)€years;€provided,€that€if€the€robbery€be€à d# àÐ r Ðà œ àà ô àaccomplished€by€the€use€of€a€deadly€weapon€the€punishment€Ìà œ àà ô àshall€be€death€by€electrocution,€or€the€jury€may€commute€the€Ìà œ àà ô àpunishment€to€imprisonment€for€life€or€for€any€period€of€time€Ìà œ àà ô ànot€less€than€ten€(10)€years.Ìà œ àÌÌÌÓÓà œ àà ô àThis€Court€has€held€that€ð ð[a]n€indictment€for€a€statutory€offense€need€onlyÏdescribe€the€crime€in€the€words€of€the€statute€or€through€words€substituted€which€areÏequivalent€to€the€words€used€in€the€statute€or€of€more€extensive€signification.ðð€€òòPatty€v.Ð :%Ú ÐStateóó,€556€S.W.2d€776,€780€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1977).€€In€fact,€the€Tennessee€SupremeÐ '¦! ÐCourt€has€held€the€words€ð ðforciblyðð€and€ð ðviolentlyðð€are€synonymous.€€òòMendolia€v.€Stateóó,Ð Ò(r# Ð241€S.W.2d€606,€611€(Tenn.€1951).€€The€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€has€also€held€anÏindictment€charging€robbery€is€not€rendered€defective€by€the€use€of€the€word€ð ðviolentlyððÏinstead€of€the€word€ð ðforcibly.ðð€€òòMcTigue€v.€Stateóó,€63€Tenn.€313€(1874).€€In€light€of€theÐ 6.Ö$) Ðforegoing,€the€indictment€charging€petitioner€with€armed€robbery€was€sufficient€whereÏð ðviolentlyðð€was€used€in€place€of€œð ðforciblyññ.ññððññ.ññ›€ÌÌà œ àà ô àPetitionerððs€final€contention€in€his€writ€of€habeas€corpus€is€that€theÏindictments€against€him€were€gained€upon€void€and€defective€affidavits€of€complaints€andÏwarrants€and€are€therefore€void.€€These€contentions€are€without€merit.€€Habeas€corpusÐ þ8ž/5 Ðrelief€is€available€only€upon€a€showing€that€a€conviction€is€void€or€the€petitionerððs€sentenceÏhas€expired.€€œññòòññññArcher€v.€Stateóóññññ,€851€S.W.2d€157€(1993).€ññññññóóññ›ññññT.C.A.›€ðððð›€29„21„101,›€et›€seq.›€(1997).ññ›€The€petitioner€has€alleged€nothingÐ , Ì Ðthat€would€entitle€him€to€habeas€corpus€relief.€€Furthermore,€it€is€well€settled€law€that€allÏquestions€as€to€the€sufficiency€of€a€warrant€are€foreclosed€by€the€finding€of€an€indictment.€ÏòòJones€v.€Stateóó,€206€Tenn.€245,€256„57,€332€S.W.2d€662,€667€(Tenn.€1960);€òòsee€alsoóóÐ 0 ÐòòState€v.€Southland€News€Co.,€Inc.óó,€587€S.W.2d€103,€105€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1979).€€TheÐ \ü  ÐTennessee€Supreme€Court€has€also€stated€ð ðit€would€be€a€miscarriage€of€justice€to€holdÏthat€when€the€probability€of€the€commission€of€a€crime€has€been€called€to€the€attentionÏof€the€grand€jury€by€either€a€defective€or€even€a€void€warrant,€the€grand€jury€would€beÏpowerless€to€investigate€the€situation€further€and€to€find€a€valid€indictment€for€whateverÏoffense€or€offenses€their€investigation€might€develop.ðð€€òòJonesóó,€332€S.W.2d€at€667.€€ThisÐ Xø Ðreasoning€is€also€applicable€to€petitionerððs€claim€that€defective€complaints€rendered€theÏindictments€against€him€void.€€As€such,€the€indictments€against€the€petitioner€are€valid.ÌÌà œ àà ô àPetitioner€has€also€filed€a€reply€brief€with€this€Court€alleging€the€trial€courtÏwas€without€jurisdiction€to€dismiss€his€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€and€writ€of€habeasÏcorpus,€and€the€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€when€counsel€was€allowed€toÏwithdraw€from€petitionerððs€case€without€filing€a€motion€to€withdraw€or€informing€the€courtÏof€such€withdrawal.€€It€is€well„settled€that€a€post„conviction€petitioner€may€not€raiseÏgrounds€on€appeal€that€were€not€charged€in€the€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€or€theÏamended€petition.€€òòLong€v.€Stateóó,€510€S.W.2d€83,€85€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1974).€€As€theÐ P-ð#( Ðaforementioned€grounds€were€not€included€in€the€original€petition€for€post„conviction€reliefÏor€the€amended€petition,€this€Court€will€not€review€the€merits€of€these€allegations.€ÌÌà œ àà ô àIn€sum,€we€agree€with€the€court€below€that€the€petitionerððs€petition€for€post„¼conviction€relief€was€barred€by€the€statute€of€limitations€and€that€his€writ€of€habeas€corpusÏfailed€to€state€grounds€upon€which€relief€could€be€granted.€€Further,€there€is€no€allegationÏin€the€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€that€would€allow€the€petitioner€to€reopen€pursuantÐ ä9„06 Ðto€T.C.A.€ðð€40„30„217€(1997).̇à œ àà ô àThe€denial€of€the€petition€and€writ€of€habeas€corpus€is€affirmed.ÌÌÓÓñÁñœñÁññÃñœñÃññ¼ñÌñ¼ññ½ñ›ñ½ññ¼ñà œ àñ¼ññ½ñ›ñ½ññ¼ñà ô àñ¼ññ½ñ›ñ½ññ¼ñà L àñ¼ññ½ñ›ñ½ññ¼ñà ¤ àñ¼ññ½ñ›ñ½ññ¼ñà ü àñ¼ññ½ñ›ñ½ññ¼ñà T àñ¼ññ½ñ›ñ½ññ¼ñà ¬ àñ¼ññ¼ñ›ñ¼ññ¼ñ______________________________ñ¼ññ½ññ¼ñ_ñ¼ññ½ññ¾ñÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àJOHN€H.€œPñ¾ññÅññ¾ñ€ñ¾ññÄñ›ñÄññÅññ¾ñEAY,€JudgeÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ñ¾ññÃñ›ñÃññÄñ›ñÄñÌœñ¿ñÌñ¿ññ¿ñÌñ¿ññ¿ñÌñ¿ñ______________________________›ÌœñÅñòòóóñÅñTHOMAS›€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÐ Úz  ÐÌñÂñœñÂñÌœñÀñÌñÀñ______________________________›ÌœL.€TERRY›€œLAFFERTY›,€Special€JudgeÌñ¿ñœñ¿ñ