ÿWPCo" ÚÏH[J‹fH†AgàšÆ£û•¢=êœÒ†¼z®l¡UÚ ÒwVIš[N(â]QŒö<ã-xï;4 ý3r_Ñ7Êl7® ÊÓ¸µß>åVBS.SNPy«+Ö $ýn÷œ½ÿ|±åZïÓj3LÚL¢×èj¯F(„&r#M /zutßß^çϹjݼŠ[@õÕ›áãÜ[v;o}áÊ¿œ`-]ÖF!bl‚!Þ ¸4¦Pòd$µ ýÊa'µ]Ʃ̟® d1<l“}~Г=tbßp9®ÅéŽýŸö^Ã-p6ô’g#tšÒ<…Çé[i(…çµþÝQ« ÊýNÛ¥^íë³kãÔŽ8×6ûäeS{–Üû´C.½µN@¡sl­À ÏJË_ɱu §Œ-lñü]>r„x=ÆdT‰ÄLµ‰l‘?Ú»Èîï'šêGL¾œÈŽîîgü/"<'ihñlKË u9I¸XLdý‹¨â·ºo  *Ì€gÕ©ê•EÒAÔðGè6V,£p>ñ;Àá¬úÊ/_jµªè™ô}òÛù>„‡Ûfk­ûP‚L«AÚíd<£²=ÿ¢àó%÷ж¼íû´/Ÿ´¬I…?¡/8vâ«ÃÙ˜b#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ U%N· w 4 z Ò— i x mz 1‘ Æ Æä ƪ ÆpU @6Nv 1ux 72íE 0c!UN„„ 0DÒÒ 0Š 1‡¨¨ 1‡// 1‡¶¶ 1‡== 1‡ÄÄ 1‡KK 1‡ÒÒ 1‡Ybàà 1‡èè 1‡oo 1‡öö 1‡}} 1‡ 1‡‹‹ 1‡ 1‡™™ 1‡   1‡§§ 1‡.. 1‡µµ 1‡<<©ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà 0ëllll BWW 0¤t D3 D-K 0Kxx ASÃÆ 0¤Ü 0D€! A«Ä!˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»”+â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularyG*˜C}.bk`r¥ ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|x ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ0CCEMSYaiqyAutoList1(1)I.A:(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÈhH  Z(Times New Roman 3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à(ÈhH  Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó (b·¤$¶¶à0  àà0` (#(#àÔ2#ÔÚ  ÚÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0¸ ` (#` (#à(š½CEKQW]cioAutoList2A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:0ª½CEKQW]cioAutoList3A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(º½CEKQW]cioAutoList4A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(ʽCEKQW]cioAutoList5A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(Ú½CEKQW]cioAutoList6A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(ê½CEKQW]cioAutoList7A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(ú½CEKQW]cioAutoList8A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:( ¾CEKQW]cioAutoList9A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:- ù-(*ùEGMSY_ekqAutoList10A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(:ùEGMSY_ekqAutoList11A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(JùEGMSY_ekqAutoList12A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(°NEGMSY_ekqAutoList13A;A;A;A;A;A;A;A;(jùEGMSY_ekqAutoList14A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(zùEGMSY_ekqAutoList15A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(ŠùEGMSY_ekqAutoList16A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(ðNEGMSY_ekqAutoList17A;A;A;A;A;A;A;A;(ªùEGMSY_ekqAutoList18A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(ºùEGMSY_ekqAutoList19A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(jùEGMSY_ekqAutoList20A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(zùEGMSY_ekqAutoList21A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A:(ŠùEGMSY_ekqAutoList22A:A:A:A:A:A:A:A: ŸÝ ƒRyù$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôüÕò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔNot€guilty€by€reason€of€insanity.(|G2yù$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€J»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôüÕò»»Ô d(|3G†$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€J»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3G†$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€J»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€J»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼J»»»ÔÑ8€!XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îY<JÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼J»îîY< #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€September€25,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡X!X»¼JÔÌò òÔ#†¼J»XX!##ÔFRANKLIN€SCOTT€KEITHòòóó€v.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEÔ‡X!X»¼JÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔCockeÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€26,121€€€€€€Rex€Henry€Ogle,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2001„00220„CCA„R3„PCÐ ¥õ  ÐDecember€20,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€petitioner€appeals€the€denial€of€his€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€The€petitioner€pled€guiltyÐ xÈ  Ðto€ten€counts€of€rape€of€a€child.€€On€appeal,€the€petitioner€raises€the€issues€of€whether€the€post„Ð d´ Ðconviction€court€erred€in€finding€that€he€received€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel€and€whether€hisÐ P  Ðguilty€plea€was€entered€voluntarily€and€knowingly.€òòóó€After€a€thorough€review,€we€affirm€the€judgmentÐ <Œ Ðof€the€post„conviction€court.Ð (x ÐÔ#†¼J»XX!™#ÔÔ‡X!X»¼JÔÓçÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ P ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼J»àX!7#ÔÔ‡X!X.¼JÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ôóó€and€òòJoe€G.Ð Ø( ÐRiley,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð Ä ÐÌTim€S.€Moore,€Newport,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Franklin€Scott€Keith.Ð œì ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Ô_ÔAngeleÔ_Ô€M.€Gregory,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð tÄ ÐAl€C.€Ô_ÔSchmutzerÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€James€Bruce€Dunn,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ `° ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð L œ ÐÓÓÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼J»XX!#ÔÔ‡X!X»¼JÔÐ $"t! ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼J»XX! #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X!X»¼JÔà  àThe€petitioner,€Franklin€Scott€Keith,€was€indicted€on€ten€counts€of€rape€of€a€child€for€crimesÐ ü#L# Ðalleged€to€have€occurred€on€various€dates€between€March€1995€and€April€14,€1998.€€On€DecemberÐ è$8 $ Ð9,€1998,€he€entered€a€best€interest€guilty€plea€to€all€ten€counts€as€charged.€€As€part€of€the€pleaÐ Ô%$!% Ðagreement,€he€received€concurrent€sentences€of€twenty€years€on€each€count,€as€a€Range€I,€violentÐ À&"& Ðoffender,€to€be€served€in€the€Department€of€Correction€at€100%.€€No€direct€appeal€was€taken€by€theÐ ¬'ü"' Ðpetitioner.Ð ˜(è#( ÐÓ  ÓÌÓÓà  àOn€November€23,€1999,€the€petitioner€timely€filed€a€òòpro€seóó€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€Ð p*À%* ÐCounsel€was€subsequently€appointed,€and€an€amended€petition€was€filed€on€September€12,€2000.€Ð \+¬&+ ÐIn€the€combined€petitions,€the€following€allegations€were€presented:Ð H,˜', ÐÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_ÔÓ€ (C03ÓÓ*°,XƒXŒ –X°œX*Óà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(1)à Œ àthe€conviction€was€based€on€unlawfully€induced€guilty€plea€orÐ ° Ðguilty€plea€involuntary€entered€without€understanding€the€nature€andÐ œì Ðconsequences€of€the€plea;€ÐˆØ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(2)à Œ àthe€conviction€was€based€on€use€of€coerced€confession;Ð`°` x` x Ðà  àà ` àÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(3)à Œ àthe€conviction€was€based€on€use€of€evidence€obtained€pursuant€toÐ 8 ˆ Ðan€unlawful€arrest;€€Ð$ t` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(4)à Œ àthe€conviction€was€based€on€a€violation€of€the€privilege€againstÐ ü L  Ðself„incrimination;Ðè 8 ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(5)à Œ àthe€conviction€was€based€on€the€unconstitutional€failure€of€theÐ À  Ðprosecution€to€disclose€to€defendant€evidence€favorable€to€defendant;Ð ¬ü  ÐandИè ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(6)à Œ àthe€petitioner€was€denied€effective€assistance€of€counsel.ÐpÀ` x` x ÐÌà  àAt€the€hearing€on€the€post„conviction€petition,€the€petitioner€proceeded€only€on€the€claimsÐ H˜ Ðthat€trial€counsel€was€ineffective€in€misadvising€him€that€he€would€be€eligible€for€parole€after€servingÐ 4„ Ð85%€of€his€sentences,€and€that€this€wrong€advice€invalidated€his€guilty€pleas.€€Additionally,€heÐ  p Ðpresented€testimony€that€trial€counsel€was€ineffective€in€not€obtaining€an€additional€mentalÐ  \ Ðevaluation.€€On€appeal,€the€petitioner€presented€the€additional€claim€that€counsel€was€ineffective€inÐ øH Ðnot€seeking€a€bill€of€particulars.€€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àAt€the€hearing,€the€petitioner,€his€trial€counsel,€and€the€clinical€psychologist€who€evaluatedÐ ¼  Ðthe€petitioner€prior€to€his€plea€of€guilty€all€testified.€€At€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€post„Ð ¨ø Ðconviction€court€denied€the€petition.€€On€appeal,€the€petitioner€alleges€that€his€guilty€plea€wasÐ ”ä Ðinvoluntary€because€both€the€State€and€his€trial€counsel€failed€to€inform€him€that,€due€to€the€natureÐ €Ð Ðof€his€crimes,€€he€would€serve€100%€of€his€sentence.€€ò òó óHe€further€alleges€that€his€trial€counsel€wasÐ l¼ Ðineffective€for€failing€to€pursue€a€second€mental€evaluation€and€for€failing€to€request€a€bill€ofÐ X ¨ Ðparticulars.€€òòóó€Ð D!” Ðà  àà ` àò òòòóóó óÌò òòòÓ  ÓDISCUSSIONó óóóÐ #l! ÐÓ¹ÓÌà  àThe€facts€of€this€case€were€presented€by€the€State€at€the€guilty€plea€hearing,€without€objection.€Ð ô$D # ÐThe€evidence€included€a€statement€made€by€the€petitioner€to€Detective€Robert€Caldwell€of€the€CockeÐ à%0!$ ÐCounty€Sheriffððs€Department€on€April€14,€1998,€wherein€the€petitioner€admitted€that€he€had€theÐ Ì&"% Ðvictim,€his€stepdaughter€under€the€age€of€thirteen,€perform€oral€sex€on€him€at€least€ten€times€betweenÐ ¸'#& ÐMarch€1995€and€April€14,€1998.€€The€printed€plea€agreement€bears€the€phrase:€€ð ðThe€DefendantÐ ¤(ô#' Ðagrees€to€plead,ðð€followed€by€the€handwritten€words,€ð ðRape€of€Child€„€10€counts,ðð€followed€by€theÐ )à$( Ðâ âphrase,€ð ðand€the€State€agrees€to€recommend€to€the€Court€the€following€sentence,ðð€followed€by€theÐ |*Ì%) Ðwritten€words€ð ðTwenty€(20)€years€By€statute€this€sentence€is€served€at€100%.ðð€€The€agreement€bearsÐ ° Ðthe€signature€ð ðF.€Scott€Keith,ðð€and€the€date€December€8,€1998.Ð œì Ðâ âÌÔ‡X!XXX!Ôà  àAt€the€post„conviction€hearing,€the€petitioner€testified€that€when€trial€counsel€showed€himÐ tÄ Ðthe€plea€agreement,€the€portion€which€set€out€the€sentence€had€not€been€completed€but€that€he€wasÐ `° Ðrelying€upon€his€memory€in€this€regard,€which,€he€agreed,€was€ð ðnot€very€good.ðð€€The€petitioner€saidÐ L œ Ðthat€there€had€been€some€discussion€of€a€seventeen„€to€eighteen„year€sentence.€€He€further€stated€thatÐ 8 ˆ Ðtrial€counsel€told€him€that€his€sentence€would€be€ð ðon€the€eighty„five€percent€rangeðð€and€that€hisÐ $ t Ðsentence€could€be€reduced€by€15%.€€However,€the€petitioner€acknowledged€that€the€plea€agreementÐ  ` Ðbearing€his€signature€stated€that€his€sentence€would€be€ð ð[t]wenty€years€by€statute,€this€sentenceÐ ü L  Ðserved€at€one€hundred€percent.ðð€€Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àWhen€questioned€about€his€confession,€the€petitioner€said€that€he€had€no€memory€of€givingÐ À  Ðthe€statement€and€that€trial€counsel€did€not€discuss€it€with€him.€€The€petitioner€stated€that€he€had€seenÐ ¬ü  Ða€doctor€in€Nashville€in€1991€or€1992€for€his€memory€lapses,€but€never€returned€to€the€doctor€forÐ ˜è  Ðfollow„up€tests.€€He€said€that€he€had€abused€ð ðalcohol,€cocaine,€pills,€[and]€marijuanaðð€since€his€earlyÐ „Ô  Ðteen€years,€but€said€that€he€stopped€when€he€began€his€employment€at€Mountain€View€YouthÐ pÀ ÐDevelopment.Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àDr.€Richard€Jeffrey€Munson,€a€clinical€psychologist€with€Cherokee€Health€Systems,€testifiedÐ 4„ Ðthat€he€conducted€a€mental€evaluation€of€the€petitioner€on€November€4,€1998.€€Dr.€Munson€said€thatÐ  p Ðthe€petitioner€claimed€to€have€ð ðblack„outsðð€and€that€the€petitioner€told€him€he€had€experiencedÐ  \ Ðmemory€lapses€prior€to€and€after€a€motor€vehicle€accident€he€had€in€1995.€€He€testified€he€had€noÐ øH Ðrecollection€as€to€whether€the€petitioner€claimed€to€have€a€history€of€substance€abuse.€€Dr.€MunsonÐ ä4 Ðconcluded€that€the€petitioner€suffered€from€a€mental€illness€but€was€competent€to€stand€trial.€Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àThe€petitionerððs€trial€counsel€testified€that,€at€the€time€of€the€hearing,€he€had€been€with€theÐ ¨ø ÐPublic€Defenderððs€office€for€twelve€years.€€He€ð ðguess[ed]ðð€that€he€had€prepared€the€plea€agreementÐ ”ä Ðand€said€that€it€stated€the€petitionerððs€sentence€would€be€served€at€100%.€€Counsel€did€not€recallÐ €Ð Ðdiscussing€with€the€petitioner€that€the€sentence€would€be€served€at€100%€or€reduced€to€85%;Ð l¼ Ðhowever,€he€stated€that€ð ðat€some€point€in€timeðð€he€thought€that€the€sentence€could€be€reduced€toÐ X ¨ Ð85%.€€Counsel€said€that€he€negotiated€the€petitionerððs€twenty„year€sentence€with€the€State,€and€thatÐ D!” Ðthere€was€a€ð ðreal€likely€possibilityðð€that€the€petitioner€would€have€received€consecutive€sentencingÐ 0"€  Ðhad€the€case€gone€to€trial€and€the€petitioner€been€convicted.Ð #l! ÐÌà  àCounsel€testified€that€the€petitionerððs€case€was€ð ðdifficultðð€because€of€the€petitionerððsÐ ô$D # Ðconfession,€the€age€of€the€victim,€and€it€involved€multiple€counts€over€an€extended€period€of€time.€Ð à%0!$ ÐRegarding€the€petitionerððs€confession,€counsel€said€that€the€petitioner€had€told€him€that€he€had€noÐ Ì&"% Ðmemory€of€giving€the€statement€and€ð ðpossibly€had€suffered€from€some€black„outs.ðð€€Counsel€filedÐ ¸'#& Ða€motion€to€suppress€the€confession,€but€no€hearing€was€held€on€the€motion.€€Counsel€said€there€wasÐ ¤(ô#' Ðno€indication€that€the€petitioner€was€coerced€into€giving€the€statement,€and€he€did€not€think€he€wouldÐ )à$( Ðhave€been€successful€on€the€motion€to€suppress.Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àCounsel€further€testified€that€the€petitioner€told€him€he€had€seen€other€doctors€for€his€memoryÐ ° Ðlapses€and€that€he€had€been€in€a€tractor„trailer€accident.€€Counsel€requested€the€mental€evaluation€ofÐ œì Ðthe€petitioner€ð ðout€of€an€abundance€of€cautionðð€but€could€not€remember€if€he€had€discussed€theÐ ˆØ Ðevaluation€with€Dr.€Munson.€€Counsel€said€that€he€also€filed€a€motion€to€have€Dr.€Eric€EngumÐ tÄ Ðappointed€to€further€evaluate€the€petitioner€in€order€to€pursue€the€avenue€of€the€petitionerððs€mentalÐ `° Ðillness€if€the€case€went€to€trial.Ô#†X!XXX!?#ÔÐ L œ ÐÌÔ‡X!XXX!Ôà  àIn€this€matter,€the€post„conviction€court€did€not€set€out€written€findings€of€fact€andÐ $ t Ðconclusions€of€law,€as€required€by€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„30„211(b).€€However,Ð  ` Ðreversal€is€not€necessarily€required€when€the€post„conviction€court€recites€from€the€bench,€asÐ ü L  Ðoccurred€here,€its€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€€Higginsóó,€729€S.W.2d€288,Ð è 8  Ð290„91€(Tenn.€Crim.€€App.€€1987);€òòState€v.€€Swansonóó,€680€S.W.2d€487,€489€(Tenn.€€Crim.€€App.€Ð Ô$  Ð1984).Ð À  ÐÔ#†X!XXX!í1#Ôòòò òÓ  ÓÌANALYSISÐ ˜è  Ðó óóóÌÓ¦4Óò òÓ  ÓStandard€of€Reviewó óÐ pÀ ÐÓê4ÓÌà  àThe€findings€of€fact€of€the€post„conviction€court€are€conclusive€on€appeal,€unless€theÐ H˜ Ðevidence€preponderates€against€the€findings.€€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€453,€461€(Tenn.€1999)Ð 4„ Ð(citing€òòState€v.€Keithóó,€978€S.W.2d€861,€864€(Tenn.€1998)).€€€The€appellate€court€cannot€ð ðreweigh€orÐ  p Ðevaluateðð€the€evidence.€€òòId.óó;€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòHenley€v.€Stateóó,€960€S.W.2d€572,€579€(Tenn.€1997),€òòcert.óóÐ  \ Ðòòdeniedóó,€525€U.S.€830,€119€S.€Ct.€82,€142€L.€Ed.€2d€64€(1998).€€However,€the€appellate€courtððs€reviewÐ øH Ðof€the€application€of€the€law€to€the€facts€is€òòde€novoóó,€without€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€€òòSeeóóÐ ä4 ÐòòBurnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€461;€òòHarries€v.€Stateóó,€958€S.W.2d€799,€802€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997)òòóó.€Ð Ð  ÐAdditionally,€issues€as€to€whether€counsel€was€ineffective€and€whether€prejudice€resulted€are€mixedÐ ¼  Ðquestions€of€law€and€fact.€€òòBurnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€461€(citing€òòGoad€v.€State,óó€938€S.W.2d€363€(Tenn.Ð ¨ø Ð1996)).€€€€Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àIn€order€to€determine€the€competence€of€counsel,€Tennessee€courts€have€applied€standardsÐ l¼ Ðdeveloped€in€federal€case€law.€€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€968€S.W.2d€900,€905€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997)Ð X ¨ Ð(noting€that€the€same€standard€for€determining€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€that€is€applied€inÐ D!” Ðfederal€cases€also€applies€in€Tennessee).€€Ô‡X!XXX!ÔThe€United€States€Supreme€Court€articulated€the€standardÐ 0"€  Ðin€òòStrickland€v.€Washingtonóó,€466€U.S.€668,€104€S.€Ct.€2052,€80€L.€Ed.€2d€674€(1984),€which€isÐ #l! Ðwidely€accepted€as€the€appropriate€standard€for€all€claims€of€a€convicted€petitioner€that€counselððsÐ $X" Ðassistance€was€defective.€€The€standard€is€firmly€grounded€in€the€belief€that€counsel€plays€a€role€thatÐ ô$D # Ðis€ð ðcritical€to€the€ability€of€the€adversarial€system€to€produce€just€results.ðð€€òòId.óó€at€685,€104€S.€Ct.€atÐ à%0!$ Ð2063.€€The€òòStricklandóó€standard€is€a€two„prong€test:Ô#†X!XXX!z;#ÔÐ Ì&"% ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àÔ‡X!XXX!ÔFirst,€the€defendant€must€show€that€counselððs€performance€wasÐ ¤(ô#' Ðdeficient.€€This€requires€showing€that€counsel€made€errors€so€seriousÐ )à$( Ðthat€counsel€was€not€functioning€as€the€ð ðcounselðð€guaranteed€theÐ |*Ì%) Ðdefendant€by€the€Sixth€Amendment.€€Second,€the€defendant€mustÐ h+¸&* Ðshow€that€the€deficient€performance€prejudiced€the€defense.€€ThisÐ ° Ðrequires€showing€that€counselððs€errors€were€so€serious€as€to€depriveÐ œì Ðthe€defendant€of€a€fair€trial,€a€trial€whose€result€is€reliable.Ô#†X!XXX!r>#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔЈØ` x` x ÐÌòòÔ#†X!XXX!A#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔId.óó€at€687,€104€S.€Ct.€at€2064.€€The€òòStricklandóó€Court€further€explained€the€meaning€of€ð ðdeficientÐ `° Ðperformanceðð€in€the€first€prong€of€the€test€in€the€following€way:Ð L œ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àIn€any€case€presenting€an€ineffectiveness€claim,€the€performanceÐ $ t Ðinquiry€must€be€whether€counselððs€assistance€was€reasonableÐ  ` Ðconsidering€all€the€circumstances.€.€.€.€€No€particular€set€of€detailedÐ ü L  Ðrules€for€counselððs€conduct€can€satisfactorily€take€account€of€theÐ è 8  Ðvariety€of€circumstances€faced€by€defense€counsel€or€the€range€ofÐ Ô$  Ðlegitimate€decisions€regarding€how€best€to€represent€a€criminalÐ À  Ðdefendant.Ьü ` x` x ÐÌòòId.óó€at€688„89,€104€S.€Ct.€at€2065.€€Petitioner€must,€therefore,€establish€that€ð ðthe€advice€given€or€theÔ#†X!XXX!gA#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔÐ „Ô  ÐÔ#†X!XXX!GE#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!Ôservice€rendered€was€not€within€the€range€of€competence€demanded€of€attorneys€in€criminal€cases[.]ðð€Ð pÀ ÐòòBankston€v.€Stateóó,€815€S.W.2d€213,€215€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ô#†X!XXX!žE#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!Ô€€Ô#†X!XXX!¡F#ÔÐ \¬ ÐÌà  àÔ‡X!XXX!ÔAs€for€the€prejudice€prong€of€the€test,€the€òòStricklandóó€Court€stated:€ð ðThe€defendant€must€showÐ 4„ Ðthat€there€is€a€reasonable€probability€that,€but€for€counselððs€unprofessional€errors,€the€result€of€theÐ  p Ðproceeding€would€have€been€different.€€A€reasonable€probability€is€a€probability€sufficient€toÐ  \ Ðundermine€confidence€in€the€outcome.ðð€€òòóó466€U.S.€at€694,€104€S.€Ct.€at€2068;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòOverton€v.Ð øH ÐStateóó,€874€S.W.2d€6,€11€(Tenn.€1994)€(holding€that€petitioner€failed€to€establish€that€ð ðthere€is€aÔ#†X!XXX!G#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔÐ ä4 ÐÔ#†X!XXX!¤I#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!Ôreasonable€probability€that,€but€for€counselððs€errors,€the€outcome€of€the€proceedings€would€have€beenÐ Ð  Ðdifferentðð).Ô#†X!XXX!ûI#Ôò òó ó€€In€the€context€of€a€guilty€plea,€a€petitioner€must€show€that,€ð ðbut€for€counselððs€errors,€heÐ ¼  Ðwould€not€have€pleaded€guilty€and€would€have€insisted€on€going€to€trial.ðð€€òòHill€v.€Lockhartóó,€474€U.S.Ð ¨ø Ð52,€59,€106€S.€Ct.€366,€370,€88€L.€Ed.€2d€203€(1985).€€Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àÔ‡X!XXX!ÔCourts€need€not€approach€the€òòStricklandóó€test€in€a€specific€order€or€even€ð ðaddress€bothÐ l¼ Ðcomponents€of€the€inquiry€if€the€defendant€makes€an€insufficient€showing€on€one.ðð€€466€U.S.€at€697,Ð X ¨ Ð104€S.€Ct.€at€2069;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòGoad€v.€Stateóó,€938€S.W.2d€363,€370€(Tenn.€1996)€(stating€that€ð ðfailureÐ D!” Ðto€prove€either€deficiency€or€prejudice€provides€a€sufficient€basis€to€deny€relief€on€the€ineffectiveÐ 0"€  Ðassistance€claimðð).Ô#†X!XXX!#L#ÔÐ #l! ÐÌà  àÔ‡X!XXX!ÔBy€statute€in€Tennessee,€the€petitioner€at€a€post„conviction€relief€hearing€has€the€burden€ofÐ ô$D # Ðproving€the€allegations€of€fact€by€clear€and€convincing€evidence.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„Ð à%0!$ Ð210(f)€(1997).€€A€petition€based€on€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€is€a€single€ground€for€relief,Ð Ì&"% Ðtherefore€all€factual€allegations€must€be€presented€in€one€claim.€€òòSeeóó€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„Ð ¸'#& Ð206(d)€(1997).€Ô#†X!XXX!N#ÔÐ ¤(ô#' ÐÌò òÓ  ÓÌÐ h+¸&* ÐI.€€Voluntariness€of€Guilty€Pleaó óÐ ° ÐÓÝPÓÌà  àThe€petitioner€alleges€that€his€guilty€plea€was€not€knowing€and€voluntary€because€his€trialÐ ˆØ Ðcounsel€failed€to€inform€him€that€he€would€have€to€serve€his€twenty„year€sentence€without€sentenceÐ tÄ Ðreduction€credits.€€Specifically,€he€contends€that€he€ð ðwas€told€both€by€the€State€and€his€attorney€thatÐ `° Ðhe€would€be€eligible€for€fifteen€percent€(15%)€sentencing€creditsðð€and€that€ð ð[t]he€trial€court€did€notÐ L œ Ðcorrect€the€mistake.ðð€€The€State€responds€that€the€petitioner€was€aware€of€the€terms€of€his€sentenceÐ 8 ˆ Ðbecause€ð ð[it]€advised€the€trial€court€that€the€defendant€would€be€sentenced€to€20€years€as€a€Range€IÐ $ t Ð100%€Violent€Offender.ðð€€Ð  ` ÐÌà  àThe€final€minute€of€the€petitionerððs€guilty€plea€hearing,€after€he€had€been€advised€of€his€rightsÐ è 8  Ðand€entered€the€pleas€which€had€been€accepted€by€the€trial€court,€is€the€basis€for€the€claim€that€theÐ Ô$  Ðpetitioner€was€misadvised€as€to€parole€eligibility:Ð À  Ðà  àÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àò òòòTHE€COURTóóó ó:ò ò€€ó óBut€anyway,€I€find€him€guilty€and€I€approve€the€pleaÐ ˜è  Ðagreement€and€I€sentence€him€accordingly€to€twenty€years€on€each€ofÐ ˆØ  Ð[the€counts].€€€He€is€Range€1,€is€that€correct?ÐtÄ` x` x Ðà  àÌà8  àà ` à[Trial€Counsel]:€€Yes,€Your€Honor.ÐLœÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àò òòòTHE€COURTóóó ó:€€Okay.Ð$tÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àò òòòGEN.€DUNNó óóó:€€Yeah,€but€that€would€be,€it€will€go€down€as€a€violentÐ P Ðcrime€under€the€violent€crime€statute.€€€Ðð@` x` x ÐÌà8  àà ` àò òòòTHE€COURTó óóó:€€Right.€€So€that€covers€„„€what€does€that€.€.ÐÈÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àò òòòGEN.€DUNNó óóó:€€That€is€eighty„five€percent.€€€You€know,€itððs€a€hundredÐ ¤ô Ðpercent€.€.Дä` x` x ÐÌà8  àà ` àò òòòTHE€COURTó óóó:€€Yes.Ðl ¼Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àò òòòGEN.€DUNNóóó ó:€€.€.€with€the€reduction€of€fifteen€percent€credits.ÐH"˜ Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àò òòòTHE€COURTóóó ó:€€So€you€understand€that,€donððt€you,€Mr.€Keith?Ð$$t"Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àò òòòMR.€KEITHóóó ó:à0` x` xà€Yes,€sir.Ð&P!$xx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àò òòòTHE€COURTóóó ó:€€And€youððve€discussed€that€with€your€attorney?ÐÜ',#&` x` x ÐÌà  àà ` àò òòòMR.€KEITHóóó ó:à0  à€Yes,€sir.и)%((#(# ÐÌÐ ”+ä&* Їà  àIn€determining€whether€a€guilty€plea€was€voluntarily,€knowingly,€and€intelligently€entered,Ð ° Ðthis€court,€like€the€trial€court,€must€consider€all€relevant€circumstances€that€existed€at€the€entry€of€theÐ œì Ðplea.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Turneróó,€919€S.W.2d€346,€353€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€A€reviewing€court€mayÐ ˆØ Ðlook€to€any€relevant€evidence€in€the€record€to€determine€the€voluntariness€of€the€plea.€€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€€WhenÐ tÄ Ðanalyzing€a€guilty€plea,€we€look€to€the€federal€standard€announced€in€òòBoykin€v.€Alabamaóó,€395€U.S.Ð `° Ð238,€89€S.€Ct.€1709,€23€L.€Ed.€2d€274€(1969),€and€the€state€standard€set€out€in€òòState€v.€Mackeyóó,€553Ð L œ ÐS.W.2d€337€(Tenn.€1977).€€òòState€v.€Pettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€540,€542€(Tenn.€1999).€€In€òòBoykinóó,€theÐ 8 ˆ ÐUnited€States€Supreme€Court€held€that€there€must€be€an€affirmative€showing€in€the€trial€court€thatÐ $ t Ða€guilty€plea€was€voluntarily€and€knowingly€given€before€it€can€be€accepted.€€395€U.S.€at€242,€89€S.Ð  ` ÐCt.€at€1711.€€Similarly,€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€in€òòMackeyóó€required€an€affirmative€showingÐ ü L  Ðof€a€voluntary€and€knowledgeable€guilty€plea,€namely€that€the€defendant€has€been€made€aware€of€theÐ è 8  Ðsignificant€consequences€of€such€a€plea.€€òòPettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€at€542.€€The€standard€is€the€same€forÐ Ô$  Ða€ð ðbest€interestðð€or€òòAlfordóó€plea,€that€is,€ð ðwhether€the€plea€represents€a€voluntary€and€intelligentÐ À  Ðchoice€among€the€alternative€courses€of€action€open€to€the€defendant.ðð€€òòNorth€Carolina€v.€Alfordóó,€400Ð ¬ü  ÐU.S.€25,€31,€91€S.€Ct.€160,€164,€òòóó27€L.€Ed.€2d€162€(1970).€€€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àA€plea€is€not€ð ðvoluntaryðð€if€it€results€from€ignorance,€misunderstanding,€coercion,Ð pÀ Ðinducements,€or€threats.€€òòBlankenship€v.€Stateóó,€858€S.W.2d€897,€904€(Tenn.€1993).€€The€trial€courtÐ \¬ Ðmust€determine€if€the€guilty€plea€is€ð ðknowingðð€by€questioning€the€defendant€to€make€sure€he€fullyÐ H˜ Ðunderstands€the€plea€and€its€consequences.€€òòPettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€at€542;€òòBlankenshipóó,€858€S.W.2d€atÐ 4„ Ð904.Ð  p Ðòòóóà  àÌà  àAt€the€post„conviction€hearing,€trial€counsel€testified€as€follows:€Ð øH ÐÌÓ€ (š½80 ÓØ! !Øà8  àà8` Ð Ð àQ.à Œ àDo€you€remember€this€Keith€case?ÐÐ ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àI€do.Шø` x` x ÐÌÓ€ !(ª½88ÓØ! !Øà8  àà8` Ð Ð àQ.à Œ àAnd€this€has€been€the€subject€of€some€discussion€already€today.€Ð €Ð ЀHe€was€convicted€as€a€child€rapist,€right?Ðl¼` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àThatððs€correct.ÐD!”` x` x ÐÓ€ #(º½88!ÓØ! !ØÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àQ.à Œ àAnd€under€that€statute€he€has€to€serve€a€hundred€percent€of€hisÐ #l! Ðsentence?Ð$X"` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àThatððs€what€we€discussed€and€at€least€in€the€back€of€[my]€mind€atÐ à%0!$ Ðsome€point€in€time€I€thought€that€that€at€one€time€could€be€reduced€toÐ Ì&"% Ðeighty„five€percent€and€Iððm€not€certain€whether€that€was€the€law€orÐ ¸'#& Ðnot.€€€Realize€now€itððs€one€hundred€percent.€€I€did€review€the€PleaÐ ¤(ô#' ÐAgreement€I€guess€that€was€drawn€by€me€that€does€say€the€plea€wasÐ )à$( Ðâ âat€one€hundred€percent,€and€I€donððt€recall€specifically€discussing€withÐ |*Ì%) ÐMr.€Keith€whether€it€was€one€hundred€percent€or€whether€it€could€beÐ ° Ðreduced€to€eighty„five€percent.Мì` x` x Ðâ âÌÓ€ %(ʽ88#ÓØ! !Øà8  àà8` Ð Ð àQ.à Œ àBecause€for€a€general€violent€offender,€for€the€other€offenses€thatÐ tÄ Ðare€set€forth€I€guess€in€the€statute€that€sets€forth€the€hundred€percentÐ `° Ðsentence€generally€for€most€offenses€that€come€under€that,€it€can€beÐ L œ Ðreduced€by€fifteen€percent€good€credit?Ð8 ˆ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àThatððs€correct.Ð `` x` x ÐÌÓ€ '(Ú½88%ÓØ! !Øà8  àà8` Ð Ð àQ.à Œ àBut€òò39„13„523óó€under€the€child€rapist€statutes€states€that€it€is€notÐ è 8  Ðto€be€€reduced,€itððs€a€hundred€percent€sentence?ÐÔ$ ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àThatððs€what€the€statute€we€reviewed€today..Ьü ` x` x ÐÌÓ€ )(ê½88'ÓØ! !Øà8  àà8` Ð Ð àò òòòTHE€COURTóóó ó:€€So€did€you€ever€discuss€with€your€client€the€fact€thatÐ „Ô  Ðit€might€get€cut€to€eighty„five€percent?ÐtÄ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àI€cannot€independently€recall€discussing€that.ÐLœ` x` x ÐÌÓ€ +(ú½88)ÓØ! !Øà8  àà8` Ð Ð àò òòòTHE€COURTóóó ó:€€Okay.Ð$t` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àLike€I€said,€the€Plea€Agreement€says€one€hundred€percent.€€€IÐ P Ðdonððt€recall€one€way€or€the€other.Ðì<` x` x ÐÌÓ€ -( ¾88+ÓØ! !Øà8  àà8` Ð Ð àQ.à Œ àDo€you€recall€the€plea€hearing€in€this€case?€€€Have€you€been€ableÐ Ä Ðto€review€that€Transcript?а` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àI€looked€at€it,€I€did.€€And€I€realized€that€[the€State]€in€thatÐ ˆØ Ðmentioned€eighty„five€percent.ÐtÄ` x` x ÐÓ€ 0(*ù88-ÓØ! !ØÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àQ.à Œ àThatððs€on€the€last€page,€right,€thatððs€the€last€thing€that€was€broughtÐ L!œ Ðup?Ð8"ˆ ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àA.à Œ àRight.Ð$`"` x` x ÐÌà  àIn€ruling€on€this€issue,€the€post„conviction€court€stated€the€following:Ð è%8!$ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà Œ àThe€Court€went€through€the€Transcript€with€Mr.€Keith€as€it€relatedÐ À'#& Ðto€the€colloquy€between€Mr.€Keith€and€myself.€€Furthermore,€the€pleaÐ ¬(ü#' Ðagreement€that€he€signed€and€a€copy€of€which€is€in€the€recordÐ ˜)è$( Ðindicates€that€it€was€one€hundred€percent€that€he€was€to€serve.€Ð „*Ô%) ÐCertainly€General€Dunn€made€some€statement€toward€the€end€of€thisÐ p+À&* Ðthat€had€possibly€indicated€that€there€might€be€some€credit,€but€creditsÐ ° Ðare€not€a€right€even€if€he€could€get€them.€€Those€are€things€that€wouldÐ œì Ðhave€to€be€earned.ЈØ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà Œ àAnd€the€Court€finds€from€the€totality€of€the€circumstances€and€theÐ `° Ðplea€agreement€as€€stated€and€signed€by€Mr.€Keith€that€the€major€thingÐ L œ Ðin€his€mind€and€his€attorneyððs€mind€was€the€avoidance€of€consecutiveÐ 8 ˆ Ðsentencing.€And€I€told€Mr.€Keith€that€he€certainly€faced€thatÐ $ t Ðpossibility€and€that€this€basically€was€being€done€after€I€heard€theÐ  ` Ðfacts€as€an€effort€to€avoid€having€that€victim€having€to€come€in€hereÐ ü L  Ðand€relive€this.€€That€was€one€of€the€reasons€I€took€the€plea€as€aÐ è 8  ÐJudge.€€€Because€he€was€an€authority€figure,€he€had€all€kinds€of€thingsÐ Ô$  Ðfor€which€he€could€have€possibly€been€enhanced€in€the€range€up€toÐ À  Ðtwenty„five€years€as€an€authority€figure.€Ð¬ü ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà Œ àHe€cut€the€minimum€deal€he€could€have€cut.€And€there€is€noÐ „Ô  Ðevidence,€in€fact€the€evidence€is€just€to€the€contrary€that€yes,€while€heÐ pÀ Ðsays€he€has€had€some€memory€losses€and€so€forth,€but€everyone€who€Ð \¬ Ðevaluated€this€man€stated€that€he€could€not€support€an€insanityÐ H˜ Ðdefense€and€that€he€was€capable€of€assisting€his€attorneys€at€trial.€€à8@aware€ofàà8@Ð Ð àà8@` x` xàÐ 4„ ÐAnd€as€I€said€from€listening€to€him€and€based€upon€his€credibility€theÐ  p ÐCourt€finds€that€his€memory€loss€is€somewhat€selective.Ð \` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà Œ àThe€Court€finds€that€by€the€overwhelming€evidence€that€hisÐ ä4 Ðpurpose€was€to€avoid€consecutive€sentencing€in€this€Court€or€at€leastÐ Ð  Ðthe€maximum€in€the€range€of€twenty„five€years.€And€that€therefore€theÐ ¼  Ðplea€agreement€was€knowing€and€voluntary€and€that€there€is€no€basisÐ ¨ø Ðupon€which€this€Court€should€or€will€set€aside€this€plea€agreement.Дä` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà Œ àSo€for€those€reasons€the€Petition€is€most€respectfully€overruled.€Ðl¼` x` x ÐÌà  àThe€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing€reveals€that€the€trial€court€carefully€and€correctlyÐ D!” Ðinformed€the€petitioner€at€length€of€his€constitutional€rights.€€€The€court€also€asked€the€petitioner€ifÐ 0"€  Ðhe€understood€that€he€was€waiving€those€rights€by€pleading€guilty.€€The€petitioner€responded€in€theÐ #l! Ðaffirmative.€€Additionally,€he€stated€that€he€understood€the€plea€agreement€and€was€entering€his€bestÐ $X" Ðinterest€plea€voluntarily.€€No€reference€was€made€about€any€sentence€credits€until€after€the€trial€courtÐ ô$D # Ðhad€accepted€the€plea€agreement€and€sentenced€the€petitioner.€€We€conclude,€therefore,€that€theÐ à%0!$ Ðpetitioner€failed€to€prove€by€clear€and€convincing€evidence€that€his€guilty€plea€was€based€on€theÐ Ì&"% Ðbelief€that€he€would€only€serve€85%€of€his€sentence.€€€Even€assuming,€òòarguendo,óó€that€trial€counselÐ ¸'#& Ðfailed€to€correctly€inform€the€petitioner€about€how€much€time€he€was€going€to€serve,€his€testimonyÐ ¤(ô#' Ðindicates€that€he€pled€guilty€because€it€was€in€his€best€interest€to€avoid€serving€consecutive€sentencesÐ )à$( Ðand€not€because€he€believed€that€he€could€serve€less€than€the€entire€sentence.€€In€fact,€he€did€notÐ |*Ì%) Ðtestify€that€he€would€not€have€pled€guilty€had€he€known€that€he€would€be€required€to€serve€100%€ofÐ h+¸&* Ðhis€sentences.€€Accordingly,€we€agree€with€the€post„conviction€court€in€finding€that€the€petitionerððsÐ ° Ðplea€was€made€knowingly,€voluntarily,€and€understandingly.€Ð œì Ðà  àÌò òÓ  ÓII.€€Ineffective€Assistance€of€Counseló óÐ tÄ ÐÓ/ŒÓà  àÌà  àThe€petitioner€argues€that€he€received€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel.€€€Specifically,€heÐ L œ Ðalleges€that€his€trial€counsel,€a€practicing€attorney€for€some€twelve€years€with€the€Public€DefenderððsÐ 8 ˆ ÐOffice€for€the€Fourth€Judicial€District,€was€ineffective€for€giving€him€erroneous€advice€regarding€hisÐ $ t Ðrelease€eligibility€at€the€time€he€entered€his€guilty€plea,€for€failing€to€pursue€the€inquiry€into€theÐ  ` Ðpetitionerððs€mental€state,€and€for€failing€to€file€for€a€bill€of€particulars.€Ð ü L  ÐÌò òÓ  ÓA.€€Erroneous€Advice€Regarding€Release€Eligibilityó óÐ Ô$  ÐÓñŽÓà  àà ` àà Œ àà  àà h àÌà  àWe€have€concluded€previously€in€this€opinion€that€the€post„conviction€court€did€not€err€inÐ ¬ü  Ðdismissing€the€petition€for€post„conviction€relief,€the€lower€court€concluding€that€the€plea€of€guiltyÐ ˜è  Ðwas€knowing€and€voluntary.€The€petitioner€presented€the€related€claim€that€he€received€ineffectiveÐ „Ô  Ðassistance€of€counsel€because€he€was€erroneously€advised€that€he€would€receive€15%€sentenceÐ pÀ Ðcredits.€€However,€to€establish€that€counsel€was€ineffective,€the€petitioner€must€show€both€that€hisÐ \¬ Ðattorneyððs€performance€was€deficient€and€that,€but€for€counselððs€errors,€he€would€not€have€pled€guiltyÐ H˜ Ðbut€would€have€gone€to€trial.€€The€petitioner€has€failed€to€present€any€testimony€that€he€would€notÐ 4„ Ðhave€entered€pleas€of€guilty€had€he€known€that€he€would€not€receive€15%€sentence€credits.€€€In€fact,Ð  p Ðtestimony€of€trial€counsel€was€that€there€was€a€ð ðreal€likely€possibilityðð€that€the€petitioner€would€haveÐ  \ Ðreceived€consecutive€sentencing€had€the€matters€gone€to€trial.€€Accordingly,€the€petitioner€has€failedÐ øH Ðto€establish€that€he€received€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€as€to€the€alleged€advice€of€counselÐ ä4 Ðregarding€sentence€credits.€€Ð Ð  ÐÌò òÓ  ÓB.€€Failure€to€Pursue€Mental€Evaluationó óÐ ¨ø ÐÓ•ÓÌà  àThe€petitioner€contends€that€his€trial€counsel€should€have€pursued€his€mental€status,€both€atÐ €Ð Ðthe€time€of€the€alleged€offenses€and€at€the€time€of€the€plea.€€The€petitioner€asserts€that€because€ð ð[a]€Ð l¼ Ðpreliminary€examination€of€[him]€at€the€local€state€mental€health€facility€found€a€mental€illness,€butÐ X ¨ Ðthat€the€mental€illness€did€not€prevent€[his]€knowing€the€wrongfulness€of€his€acts,ðð€trial€counselÐ D!” Ðshould€have€followed€up€on€the€information€ð ðto€try€to€ascertain€the€nature€of€the€mental€illness€orÐ 0"€  Ðany€mitigating€impact€the€mental€illness€might€have€on€the€criminal€case.ðð€€The€petitioner€alsoÐ #l! Ðcomplains€that€trial€counsel€did€not€pursue€the€motion€for€further€mental€evaluation€filed€the€sameÐ $X" Ðday€the€petitioner€entered€his€guilty€plea,€and€that€failure€to€have€the€petitioner€further€evaluatedÐ ô$D # Ðð ðcasts€a€cloud€over€the€guilty€plea.ððÐ à%0!$ ÐÌÓ€ F(zù880ÓØ! !Øà  àAt€the€post„conviction€hearing,€Dr.€Munson€identified€his€letter€of€December€2,€1998,€inÐ ¸'#& Ðwhich€he€stated:Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà Œ àMr.€Franklin€S.€Keith€was€referred€to€Cherokee€Health€SystemsÐ |*Ì%) Ð(CHS)€by€order€of€your€court€under€T.C.A.€33„7„301(a)€for€anÐ h+¸&* Ðevaluation€of€his€competency€to€stand€trial€as€well€as€for€anÐ ° Ðevaluation€of€his€mental€condition€at€the€time€of€the€alleged€offense.€Ð œì ÐMr.€Keith€was€evaluated€on€charges€of€rape€of€a€child€(10€counts).ЈØ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà Œ àAfter€completion€of€the€competency€evaluation,€I€have€concludedÐ `° Ðthat€his€condition€is€such€that€he€is€capable€of€defending€himself€in€aÐ L œ Ðcourt€of€law.€€In€making€this€determination,€I€found€that€heÐ 8 ˆ Ðunderstands€the€nature€of€the€legal€process;€that€he€understands€theÐ $ t Ðcharges€pending€against€him,€and€the€consequences€that€can€follow;Ð  ` Ðand€that€he€can€advise€his€counsel€and€participate€in€his€own€defense.Ðü L ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà Œ àAfter€completion€of€the€evaluation€based€on€the€standard€adoptedÐ Ô$  Ðby€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€in€òòGraham€v.€Stateóó€in€1977,€and€onÐ À  Ðthe€criteria€set€forth€in€T.C.A.€39„11„501,€it€is€my€opinion€that€aÐ ¬ü  Ðdefense€of€insanity€cannot€be€supported.€€This€opinion€is€based€on€theÐ ˜è  Ðdetermination€that€at€the€time€of€the€alleged€offense,€the€defendantÐ „Ô  Ðwas€suffering€from€a€mental€illness,€but€that€the€mental€status€was€notÐ pÀ Ðsuch€as€to€justifiably€prevent€his€knowing€the€wrongfulness€of€hisÐ \¬ Ðalleged€acts.ÐH˜` x` x ÐÌà  àWhen€asked€during€cross„examination€whether€he€had€changed€his€opinion€concerning€theÐ  p Ðpetitionerððs€mental€status,€Dr.€Munson€testified€that€he€had€not€and€that€ð ðin€[his]€opinion€the€NGRI׃J×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð  \ Ðplea€could€not€be€defended[.]ðð€Ð øH ÐÌà  àWhile€it€is€true€that€the€petitioner€claims€that€he€does€not€remember€giving€a€statement€to€theÐ Ð  Ðdetective,€the€trial€court€found€that€ð ðit€would€be€an€understatement€to€say€that€the€defendantððsÐ ¼  Ðmemory€or€loss€of€memory€is€pretty€selectðð€and€that€ð ðthere€[was]€no€evidence€in€the€record€fromÐ ¨ø Ðwhich€[the]€court€should€second€guess€[trial€counsel].ðð€€Additionally,€at€the€post„conviction€hearing,Ð ”ä Ðthere€was€no€showing€as€to€how€a€second€mental€evaluation€would€have€been€helpful€to€theÐ €Ð Ðpetitionerððs€defense.€€Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àThis€issue€is€without€merit.€Ð D!” ÐÌò òÓ  ÓC.€€Failure€to€File€for€Bill€of€Particularsó óÐ #l! ÐÓú¥Óà  àÌà  àAlthough€the€petitioner€also€claims€that€his€counsel€was€ineffective€for€failing€to€file€for€aÐ ô$D # Ðbill€of€particulars,€he€did€not€so€argue€until€this€appeal€was€filed€with€the€court.€€€He€neither€arguedÐ à%0!$ Ðthis€issue€at€the€post„conviction€hearing,€nor€was€trial€counsel€questioned€about€it.€€à Ð àÐ Ì&"% ÐÌà  àA€ground€for€post-conviction€relief€is€waived€ð ðif€the€petitioner€personally€or€through€anÐ ¤(ô#' Ðattorney€failed€to€present€it€for€determination€in€any€proceeding€before€a€court€of€competentÐ )à$( Ðjurisdiction€in€which€the€ground€could€have€been€presented[.]ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-30-206(g)Ð ° Ð(1997).€€The€petitioner€has€waived€this€issue€by€his€failure€to€raise€it€before€the€post-conviction€court.€Ð œì ÐòòSeeóó€òòWorkman€v.€Stateóó,€868€S.W.2d€705,€709€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€this€issue€has€been€waived€and€cannot€now€be€raised€on€appeal.Ð `° Ðà  àà ` àà Œ àà  àà h àÌà  àà ` àà Œ àà  àà h àò òòòCONCLUSIONóóó óÐ 8 ˆ ЀÌà  àWe€conclude€that€the€petitionerððs€guilty€plea€was€entered€knowingly€and€voluntarily€and€thatÐ  ` Ðhe€received€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel.€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€post„convictionÐ ü L  Ðcourt€is€affirmed.Ð è 8  ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà Œ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ˜è  Ðà  àà ` àà Œ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGEÐ „Ô  ÐÌÌÌ