WPC: Y7՗zjמ THԕno5zgBAդf$%(FDA;T5 zO񗑬?"IƏ[J“H)4Mh@qab07%t0OnigS/V_q /I9kg\Tx bZI%(\Z|WLN@NhD (BF~ VMqɸ /9)l> CثWkPk'v9$z—@2SͰyWwOQr|UB7%{Pz kؗvx6ݔYaHИX&~&MyUL *ywgz^PGuETiJ;ǨUK((Ȗ\_]oR+ hsnr"~bv4B \n#W.ݛb#\ %% ^ + 07 UN w 4 z%  q  m   g -N 0DE------------------------b//////////////////////////////////// 07777 B"" 0? D3 D- 0KCC AS 0 0DK AHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0IJp1 (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regularh_B0.bk C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  R/$      1    _AccordingtothePetitionersBrief,healsopledguiltytoonecountofproductionofmarijuana,anadditional  countofaggravatedburglary,andonecountofseconddegreeburglarybeforetheHendersonCountyCircuitCourt. q Further,thePetitionersBriefstatesthathealsopledguiltyin_Dickson_ԀCountytoonecountofaggravated_kidnapping_ 2 andonecountofaggravatedrobbery.However,therecordcontainsnojudgmentsfromtheseothercountsand,therefore, C theywillnotbeconsideredbythisCourt.(#$  0    R/$      2    _Thesetwocasesarementionedintherecordbutthereisnofurtherinformationintherecordregardingthese  judgments.- -(|G2/$ !.8Qdd8         0   d(|3$ !.8Qdd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8Qdd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Qdd8     _   Q8įXXdd8@hhr^QINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#Qr^ #Ԉ #    @  @` XįXQ #QXXį#MICHAELK.KENNEDYv.STATEOFTENNESSEEXįXQ  ? @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforWayneCounty  9 @@No.14003RobertHolloway,Judge  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200302059CCAR3_HC_ԀFiledNovember12,_2004_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^     ThePetitioner,MichaelKeithKennedy,appealsfromthedismissalofhispetitionforthewritof V  habeascorpus.TheStatehasfiledamotionrequestingthattheCourtaffirmthetrialcourtsdenial ? ofreliefpursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.WefindtheStatesmotion (x hasmerit.Accordingly,themotionisgrantedandtheappealisaffirmedpursuanttoRule20,Rules a oftheCourtofCriminalAppeals. J #QXXįd#XįXQ Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtAffirmedPursuanttoRule20,Rulesof  theCourtofCriminalAppeals     #QXį#XįX.QRobertW._Wedemeyer_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Welles,and  JerryL.Smith,JJ,joined. r MichaelKeithKennedy,prose,Clifton,Tennessee. D PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;JenniferL._Bledsoe_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral, f fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. O  MEMORANDUM @@OO& OPINION " "     OnJune11,1990,thePetitionerpledguiltybeforetheHendersonCountyCircuitCourtto x% % thefollowing:threecountsofaggravatedburglary;threecountsoftheft;onecountofpossession a&!& ofburglarytools;andonecountofaggravatedassault._ #  1      _ԀPetitionerreceiveda6yearsentencefor J'"' eachofthethreeaggravatedburglaryconvictionswiththesentencestobeservedconcurrentlywith 3(#( eachother,butconsecutivetohissentencesfromChesterCircuitNo.3118andMadisonCircuitNo.  90_54. #  2      ׀Petitionerreceiveda3yearsentenceforeachofthethreetheftconvictionstobeserved  concurrentlywiththecount1aggravatedburglaryconviction.Petitionerreceiveda2yearsentence  forthepossessionofburglarytoolsconvictionanda6yearsentencefortheaggravatedassault k conviction,eachtobeservedconcurrentlywiththecount1aggravatedburglaryconviction. T   OnMay2,2003,thePetitionerfiled,prose,apetitionforwritofhabeascorpusreliefinthe & v WayneCountyCircuitCourt.Heassertedthathissentencehadexpired,buttheTennessee  _ DepartmentofCorrectionhadmiscalculatedhispretrialjailcredits.OnJune26,2003,thetrial  H courtissuedanorderdenyingthePetitionersapplicationforhabeascorpusrelief.ThePetitioner  1  filedhisnoticeofappealinthetrialcourtonAugust6,2003.      Thegroundsuponwhichawritofhabeascorpusmaybeissuedareverynarrow.McLaney   v.Bell,59S.W.3d90,92(Tenn.2001).Awritofhabeascorpusisavailableonlywhenitappears   fromthefaceofthejudgmentorrecordthateithertheconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictionto n  convictorsentencethepetitioner,orthepetitionerssentencehasexpired.Archerv.State,851 W  S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993);Pottsv.State,833S.W.2d60,62(Tenn.1992).Inotherwords, @ habeascorpusreliefmayonlybesoughtwhenthejudgmentisvoid,notmerelyvoidable.Taylor )y v.State,995S.W.2d78,83(Tenn.1999). b   ThePetitionerhasfailedtosetforthanyallegationsthatwouldindicatethatthetrialcourt 4 lackedjurisdictiontoconvictorsentencehimorthatheisunlawfully restrainedforasentencethat  hasexpired.PetitionerallegesthattheDepartmentofCorrectionshasmiscalculatedhissentence,  andhissentencehasexpired.However,basedupontherecordbeforeus,thereisnoproofthat  Petitionerssentencehasexpired.AlthoughthePetitionerallegesthatheisentitledtopretrialjail  credits,therecordisdevoidofanydocumentationofwhen,orif,thePetitionerservedanytimepre q trial. Z   EvenifthePetitionersclaimofsentencereductionmiscalculationhadmerit,anhabeas ,| corpusproceedingwouldnotbeappropriatebecause complaintsregardingsentencecredit e miscalculationsthatrelatetoreleaseeligibilityshortoffullserviceofthesentencedonotwarrant N habeascorpusrelief.Hancockv.State,No.01C019710CR00489,1998WL453682,at*1  7 (Tenn.Crim.App.,atNashville,July30,1998),perm.toappealdenied(Tenn.Feb.16,1999);see !   also,Statev.Warren,740S.W.2d427,428(Tenn.Crim.App.1986).ThePetitionerattemptsto " ! distinguishhiscasefromHancock,however,thereisnoevidencetosupportthePetitioners #" contentionthathisjudgmentisvoidforfailuretocomplywithstatutoryrequirements.Petitioner $# hasfailedtoestablishbyapreponderanceoftheevidencethathisconvictionisvoidorhistermof t% $ imprisonmenthasexpired. ]&!%   Accordingly,theStatesmotionisgranted.Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedin /(#' accordancewithRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals. )h$( Ї   `     h     ___________________________________     `     h     ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE