ÿWPCP [ˆ×bé—&×­,l‰?ÜÿØO J#A«5?¬öŒâl†y‰É¨nT‚6«á§Wì²MG¦àãCÈžœæœR£ÇÝ¢UbÎÏ=jŽvÕPv^mÜŽx„Ñ›«büó¦Ï²ÞÚŠÞöPX–Ts­úWZ¦•òIWÙ1n;AœË èaF1^§¸!²Ê0ðDÈ)XÂÍví;˜,ÆvÉp|ÿÁøËü/{Ù§V«‚€˜¤àsãþòàç:ßËCfefûãiu…l¯6öèO“Éuб síˆqÄ zì@Æ–˜šgd–Mpô?-ž(î!äá`#ŠÍj¥V µ1É®ž²/J7hº´ÎqªlK¬b6Fî„ɹèÉå° bÅŸÊ8‘FŽ(\¯å<ÇüL½a‰ üõ’ðëÿÆQ2ªëéÇÉ›ëLÌ+“BB+=à&ú`Ò·,Þ.Mo×Fevéy'x…Ÿ+å¼ÊúPÅɬl9ýß©!Åb#Á\ % UN# 0ˆq UNù ^ G wS zW ÒÑ 4£ · Æ mÈ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1N÷NùûU@ECCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCbEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 0ëMMMM B88 0¤U D3ù D-, 0KYY AS¤Æ÷ 0¤½ 0Da A«¥˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»(ÈhH  Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularÂpD+â  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptyG*Hó¦k1Tô¦3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 (ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman - ù-(|G2¼"$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€W¥»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôûýò»»Ô d(|3‡Š$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€W¥»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3‡Š$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€W¥»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€W¥»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼W¥»»»ÔÑ8€yXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îDdW¥ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@‡‡$ìàAT€Ô#†¼W¥»îîDd #ÔKNOXVILLEˆÐ Ö& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` à€Assigned€on€Briefs€August€21,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XyX»¼W¥ÔÌò òÔ#†¼W¥»XXy!#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€Ô_ÔKRISTINEÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔKUHNEÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡XyX»¼W¥Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔBlountÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€C„12548€€€€€€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2000„02269„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐOctober€4,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡XyXXXyÔThe€defendant€pled€guilty€in€the€Ô_ÔBlountÔ_Ô€County€Circuit€Court€to€assault,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor,€andÐ xÈ  Ðwas€sentenced€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days.€€The€trial€court€ordered€a€split€confinementÐ d´ Ðwith€thirty€days€in€jail,€and€the€balance€to€be€served€on€probation.€€In€this€appeal€as€of€right,€theÐ P  Ðdefendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€her€full€probation.€€After€careful€review,€weÐ <Œ Ðaffirm€the€defendantððs€sentence€but€remand€the€matter€to€the€trial€court€for€entry€of€a€correctedÐ (x Ðjudgment.Ð d ÐÔ#†XyXXXy7#ÔÔ#†¼W¥»XXy×#ÔÔ‡XyX»¼W¥ÔÓ+ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmed€andÐ ì< ÐRemanded€for€Entry€of€Corrected€Judgmentó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼W¥»àXy4#ÔÔ‡XyX.¼W¥ÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,óó€and€òòJohnÐ ° ÐEverett€Williams,€J.óó,€joined.Ð œì ÐÌRaymond€Mack€Garner,€District€Public€Defender,€and€George€H.€Waters,€Assistant€District€PublicÐ tÄ ÐDefender,€for€the€appellant,€Ô_ÔKristineÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔKuhneÔ_Ô.Ð `° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Ô_ÔAngeleÔ_Ô€M.€Gregory,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð 8!ˆ  ÐMichael€L.€Flynn,€District€Attorney€General;€and€William€R.€Reed,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ $"t! ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð #`" ÐÓ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼W¥»XXy@ #ÔÔ‡XyX»¼W¥ÔÐ è$8 $ ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼W¥»XXy #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XyX»¼W¥ÔÔ‡XyXXXyÔà  àThe€defendant,€Ô_ÔKristineÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔKuhneÔ_Ô,€pled€guilty€to€assault€of€a€resident€of€the€nursing€home€whereÐ À&"& Ðshe€was€employed.€€Pursuant€to€the€plea€agreement,€the€length€and€manner€of€service€of€the€sentenceÐ ¬'ü"' Ðwere€submitted€to€the€trial€court€for€determination.€€Following€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€courtÐ ˜(è#( Ðimposed€a€sentence€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days,€finding€one€enhancement€factor:€€thatÐ „)Ô$) Ðthe€victim€was€particularly€vulnerable€because€of€age,€or€physical€or€mental€disability.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð p*À%* ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(4).€€As€to€the€manner€of€service€of€the€sentence,€the€court€ordered€theÐ \+¬&+ Ðdefendant€to€serve€thirty€days€in€confinement,€in€two€Ô_ÔtwoÔ_Ô„week€periods,€with€the€balance€to€beÐ H,˜', Ðserved€on€probation.€Ð 4-„(-ýÿ ÐÔ_Ô‡ò òòòÓ  ÓÌDISCUSSIONó óóóÐ œì ÐÓYÓÌà  àAt€the€time€of€the€assault,€the€defendant€was€a€nineteen„year„old€high€school€graduate€tryingÐ tÄ Ðto€enter€nursing€school.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing,€she€testified€that€she€had€been€working€at€AsburyÐ `° ÐAcres€Health€Care€Center€since€her€graduation€in€May€1999.€€€The€defendant€said€that€she€wasÐ L œ Ðworking€the€evening€shift€on€February€17,€2000,€at€Asbury€Acres€where€the€victim,€Bernice€Henry,Ð 8 ˆ Ða€seventy„nine„year„old€Alzheimerððs€patient,€resided.€€As€part€of€her€duties€that€evening,€theÐ $ t Ðdefendant€gave€the€victim€a€shower€and€put€her€to€bed.€€She€then€proceeded€to€make€her€dailyÐ  ` Ðrounds.€€When€she€later€returned€to€the€victimððs€room,€she€noticed€that€the€victim€had€vomited€in€herÐ ü L  Ðbed.€€She€notified€the€nurse€on€duty€and€then€sat€the€victim€up€in€her€bed€and€began€changing€herÐ è 8  Ðgown.€€The€defendant€testified€that€because€the€victim€was€ð ðscreaming€and€wiggling,ðð€the€defendantÐ Ô$  Ðpulled€her€hair€to€raise€her€head€up€and€then€dropped€her.€€The€side€of€the€victimððs€face€hit€the€bedÐ À  Ðrail€as€she€fell.€€The€defendant€finished€dressing€the€victim€and€left€the€room.€€The€defendant€saidÐ ¬ü  Ðthat€she€came€back€to€the€victimððs€room€thirty€minutes€later€to€check€on€her,€and€that€the€victimÐ ˜è  Ðð ðlooked€fineðð€to€her€but€complained€of€a€headache.€€At€the€end€of€her€shift,€the€defendant€left€workÐ „Ô  Ðwithout€reporting€the€incident.€Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€explained€that,€at€the€time€of€the€assault,€she€had€been€under€a€great€deal€ofÐ H˜ Ðstress€as€a€result€of€failing€a€test€when€trying€to€enter€nursing€school€and€from€her€frustration€withÐ 4„ Ðher€co„workers€who€would€not€help€her€with€her€overwhelming€workload.€€She€said€that€she€wasÐ  p Ðð ðjust€fed€upðð€with€her€job€and€lost€control€of€herself€when€she€assaulted€the€victim.Ð  \ ÐÌà  àThe€defendantððs€parents,€Edwin€and€Roberta€Kuhne,€testified€on€her€behalf.€€They€indicatedÐ ä4 Ðthat€their€daughter€had€never€been€in€trouble€and€that€the€assault€incident€was€a€shock€to€them.€€TheÐ Ð  Ðdefendantððs€father€testified€that€the€defendant€had€been€very€upset€since€the€incident,€and€that€sheÐ ¼  Ðunderstood€that€it€should€not€have€happened.€€Mr.€Kuhne€said€that€the€employees€of€the€nursingÐ ¨ø Ðhome€ð ðwere€under€a€lot€of€tensionðð€and€were€ð ðtreated€badly.ððÐ ”ä ÐÌà  àAs€its€only€witness,€the€State€called€Willard€Henry,€the€victimððs€son.€€He€testified€that€theÐ l¼ Ðnursing€home€called€him€after€the€incident€and€that€he€went€directly€to€the€hospital€emergency€roomÐ X ¨ Ðwhere€he€found€his€mother€with€ð ða€large€bruise,ðð€her€nose€ð ðall€out€of€shape,ðð€and€ð ð[b]oth€eyes€wereÐ D!” Ðblack€and€she€was€in€terrible„looking€shape.ðð€€He€further€testified€that€his€mother€had€been€heavilyÐ 0"€  Ðsedated€prior€to€the€assault€and€was€ð ðcompletely€unable€to€do€anything€for€herselfðð€and€ð ð[u]nable€toÐ #l! Ðdefend€herself€whatsoever.ðð€€He€said€that€his€mother€appeared€to€be€ð ðalmost€comatoseðð€as€a€resultÐ $X" Ðof€the€medication€she€had€been€given.Ð ô$D # ÐÔ#†XyXXXyK #ÔÔ‡XyXXXyÔòòò òÌÓ  ÓÐ  Ì&"% ÐANALYSISó óóóÐ ° ÐÌò òStandard€of€Reviewó óÐ ˆØ ÐÓ•ÓòòóóÔ#†XyXXXyo#ÔÔ‡XyXXXyÔÌà  àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€length€and€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€it€is€the€duty€ofÐ `° Ðthis€court€to€conduct€a€òòóóòòde€novoóó€review€on€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€ð ðthe€determinationsÐ L œ Ðmade€by€the€court€from€which€the€appeal€is€taken€are€correct.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€Ð 8 ˆ ÐThis€presumption€is€ð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€courtÐ $ t Ðconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823Ð  ` ÐS.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€The€presumption€does€not€apply€to€the€legal€conclusions€reachedÐ ü L  Ðby€the€trial€court€in€sentencing€the€accused€or€to€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€which€areÐ è 8  Ðpredicated€upon€uncontroverted€facts.€€òòState€v.€Butleróó,€900€S.W.2d€305,€311€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð Ô$  Ð1994);€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€891€S.W.2d€922,€929€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994)òòóó;€òòState€v.€Bonestelóó,€871€S.W.2dÐ À  Ð163,€166€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€However,€this€court€is€required€to€give€great€weight€to€the€trialÐ ¬ü  Ðcourtððs€determination€of€controverted€facts€as€the€trial€courtððs€determination€of€these€facts€isÐ ˜è  Ðpredicated€upon€the€witnessesðð€demeanor€and€appearance€when€testifying.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àIn€conducting€a€òòóóòòde€novoóó€review€of€a€sentence,€this€court€must€consider€(a)€any€evidenceÐ \¬ Ðreceived€at€the€trial€and/or€sentencing€hearing,€(b)€the€presentence€report,€(c)€the€principles€ofÐ H˜ Ðsentencing,€(d)€the€arguments€of€counsel€relative€to€sentencing€alternatives,€(e)€the€nature€andÐ 4„ Ðcharacteristics€of€the€offense,€(f)€any€mitigating€or€enhancement€factors,€(g)€any€statements€made€byÐ  p Ðthe€accused€in€his€own€behalf,€and€(h)€the€accused's€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitationÐ  \ Ðor€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„103€and€„210;€€òòState€v.€Scottóó,€735€S.W.2d€825,€829€(Tenn.Ð øH ÐCrim.€App.€1987)òòóó.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àThe€party€challenging€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€has€the€burden€of€establishingÐ ¼  Ðthat€the€sentence€is€erroneous.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401,€Sentencing€Commission€Cmts.;€Ð ¨ø ÐòòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169òòóó.€€In€this€case,€the€defendant€has€the€burden€of€illustrating€the€sentenceÐ ”ä Ðimposed€by€the€trial€court€is€erroneous.Ô#†XyXXXy@ #ÔÔ‡XyXXXyÔÐ €Ð Ðà  àÌò òÓ  ÓProbationÐ X ¨ Ðó óÌÓ/+Óà  àThe€sole€issue€on€appeal€is€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€not€granting€full€probation.€€TheÐ 0"€  Ðdefendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€misapplied€the€sentencing€consideration€concerningÐ #l! Ðð ðdepreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offenseðð€to€the€facts€of€the€case.€Ð $X" ÐÌò òà  àó óÔ#†XyXXXyë*#Ô€€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„35„303(a)€states€that€a€defendant€shall€beòò€óóeligibleÐ à%0!$ Ðfor€probation,€subject€to€certain€exceptions,€if€the€sentence€imposed€upon€the€defendant€is€of€eightÐ Ì&"% Ðyears€or€less.€€Even€if€eligible,€however,€the€defendant€is€not€automatically€€entitled€to€probation€asÐ ¸'#& Ða€matter€of€law.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(b).€€The€burden€is€upon€the€€defendant€to€showÐ ¤(ô#' Ðthat€he€is€a€suitable€candidate€for€probation.€€òòState€v.€Goodeóó,€956€S.W.2d€521,€527€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð )à$( ÐApp.€1997);€òòState€v.€Boggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€467,€477€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996);€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð |*Ì%) Ððð€40„35„303(b).€€In€order€to€meet€this€burden,€the€defendant€ð ðmust€demonstrate€that€probation€willÐ h+¸&* Ðððsubserve€the€ends€of€justice€and€the€best€interest€of€both€the€public€and€the€defendant.ðððð€€òòState€v.Ð ° ÐBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€448,€456€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995)€(quoting€òòState€v.€Dykesóó,€803€S.W.2d€250,Ð œì Ð259€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990)).€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àThere€is€no€bright€line€rule€for€determining€when€a€defendant€should€be€granted€probation.€Ð `° ÐòòBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€456.€€Every€sentencing€decision€necessarily€requires€a€case„by„caseÐ L œ Ðanalysis.€€òòId.óó€€Factors€to€be€considered€include€the€circumstances€surrounding€the€offense,€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðdefendantððs€criminal€record,€the€defendantððs€social€history€and€present€condition,€the€need€forÐ $ t Ðdeterrence,€and€the€best€interest€of€the€defendant€and€the€public.€€òòGoodeóó,€956€S.W.2d€at€527.€òòóóÔ‡XyXXXyÔÐ  ` ÐÌà  àMisdemeanor€sentencing€guidelines€are€codified€at€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„Ð è 8  Ð35„302(d)€which€provides,€in€pertinent€part:Ð Ô$  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àIn€imposing€a€misdemeanor€sentence,€the€court€shall€fix€a€percentageÐ ¬ü  Ðof€the€sentence€which€the€defendant€shall€serve.€.€.€.€€In€determiningÐ ˜è  Ðthe€percentage€of€the€sentence€to€be€served€in€actual€confinement,€theÐ „Ô  Ðcourt€shall€consider€the€purposes€of€this€chapter,€the€principles€ofÐ pÀ Ðsentencing,€and€the€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€set€forthÐ \¬ Ðherein,€and€shall€not€impose€such€percentages€arbitrarily.ÐH˜` x` x ÐÌà  àThe€statutory€presumption€favoring€an€alternative€sentence€is€limited€to€Class€C,€D,€and€EÐ  p Ðfelonies.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code.€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6).€€The€defendant€appears€to€argue€that€herÐ  \ Ðmisdemeanor€conviction€entitles€her€to€the€same€presumption:€€ð ð[I]t€is€only€reasonable€to€concludeÐ øH Ðthat€one€convicted€of€a€class€A€misdemeanor€is€clothed€with€the€same€presumption€as€thoseÐ ä4 Ðconvicted€of€more€serious€offenses€(class€C,€D,€&€E€felonies).ðð€€In€fact,€this€contention€has€beenÐ Ð  Ðspecifically€rejected€by€this€court:Ð ¼  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àContrary€to€the€appellant's€assertion,€he€is€not€entitled€to€theÐ ”ä Ðstatutory€presumption€regarding€alternative€sentencing.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ €Ð ÐAnn.€ðð€40-35-102(6)€(1990).€€The€presumption€is€limited€in€scope€toÐ l¼ Ðan€accused€who€is€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D€or€E€felony.€€It€does€notÐ X ¨ Ðapply€to€an€accused€convicted€of€a€misdemeanor.€€òòState€v.€Creasyóó,Ð D!” Ð885€S.W.2d€829,€832-33€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòper.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.Ð 0"€  Ð1994).Ð#l!` x` x ÐÌòòState€v.€Williamsóó,€914€S.W.2d€940,€949€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€Thus,€unlike€in€the€cases€citedÐ ô$D # Ðby€the€defendant€in€support€of€her€claim€that€she€was€entitled€to€probation€of€the€entire€sentence,€sheÐ à%0!$ Ðwas€not€entitled€to€a€statutory€presumption€to€that€effect.Ð Ì&"% ÐÌÔ#†XyXXXyÕ3#ÔÔ‡XyXXXyÔà  àTrial€courts€have€more€flexibility€in€misdemeanor€sentencing€than€in€felony€sentencing.€€òòStateÐ ¤(ô#' Ðv.€Johnsonóó,€15€S.W.3d€515,€518€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€2000).€Ð )à$( Ðâ âFurther,€in€sentencing€a€misdemeanant,€the€court€need€not€make€explicit€findings€of€enhancementÐ |*Ì%) Ðand€mitigating€factors€as€in€a€felony€case.€€òòState€v.€Russellóó,€10€S.W.3d€270,€278€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),Ð ° Ðòòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1999).Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àThe€presentence€report€reflected€that€the€defendant€had€no€prior€criminal€record.€€She€had€aÐ tÄ Ðhigh€school€diploma€and€was€enrolled€full„time€at€the€Knoxville€Business€College.€€She€was€alsoÐ `° Ðemployed€and€worked€about€twenty„five€hours€a€week.€€€At€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendantÐ L œ Ðdenied€using€any€alcohol€or€illegal€drugs€and€expressed€remorse€to€the€victimððs€family€for€herÐ 8 ˆ Ðactions.€€She€also€stated€that€she€had€been€prohibited€by€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Health€fromÐ $ t Ðever€working€in€the€medical€field€again.Ð  ` ÐÌà  àIn€considering€the€facts€surrounding€the€offense,€the€trial€court€found€in€mitigation€that€aÐ è 8  Ðsustained€intent€to€violate€the€law€did€not€motivate€the€defendantððs€conduct.€€The€court,€however,Ð Ô$  Ðfound€that€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„35„114,€some€enhancement€factorsÐ À  Ðwere€present.€€òòóóThe€court€further€stated:€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àYou€are€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternativeÐ „Ô  Ðsentencing€under€the€theory€of€the€act,€as€opposed€to€a€straightÐ pÀ Ðsentence€of€confinement.€€And€I€donððt€think€there€is€anything€that€hasÐ \¬ Ðdisproven€that.€€There€are€enhancing€factors€present.€€One€of€those€isÐ H˜ Ðthat€the€victim€in€this€case€was€particularly€vulnerable€of€her€age€andÐ 4„ Ðalso€because€of€her€physical€condition,€which€I€think€nobodyÐ  p Ðdisagrees€with€that.Ð \` x` x ÐÌà  àEnhancement€under€factor€(4),€that€the€victim€was€ð ðparticularly€vulnerable€because€of€ageÐ ä4 Ðor€physical€or€mental€disability,ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(4),€looks€to€physical€and€mentalÐ Ð  Ðlimitations,€as€well€as€the€victimððs€age.€€òòState€v.€Adams,óó€864€S.W.2d€31,€35€(Tenn.€1993).€Ð ¼  Ðð ðParticularly€vulnerableðð€in€this€context€means€incapable€of€resisting,€summoning€help,€or€testifyingÐ ¨ø Ðagainst€the€perpetrator.€€òòId.óó€€The€son€of€the€elderly€victim€clearly€testified€that€the€victim€had€beenÐ ”ä Ðheavily€sedated€prior€to€the€assault€and€could€not€defend€herself.€€The€victim€also€suffered€fromÐ €Ð ÐAlzheimerððs€disease€and€was€totally€dependent€upon€others€for€her€care.Ð l¼ Ðòòò òó óóóÔ#†XyXXXy_=#ÔÔ‡XyXXXyÔÌòòòòóóóóà  àOur€review€of€misdemeanor€sentencing,€unlike€that€for€a€felony,€is€to€determine€whether€theÐ D!” Ðtrial€court€considered€the€purposes€of€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act,€the€sentencing€principles,Ð 0"€  Ðand€the€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€and€did€not€impose€an€arbitrary€sentence.€€It€is€clear€thatÐ #l! Ðthe€trial€court€did€so€in€setting€the€defendantððs€sentence€and€in€requiring€that€it€be€suspended€exceptÐ $X" Ðfor€two€two„week€blocks,€scheduled€so€as€not€to€be€disruptive€to€the€defendantððs€school€schedule.€Ð ô$D # ÐThe€trial€court€acted€within€its€discretionary€authority€in€determining€that€the€defendant€should€serveÐ à%0!$ Ða€minimum€jail€sentence€given€the€facts€of€the€case,€especially,€as€the€court€found,€because€of€theÐ Ì&"% Ðparticular€vulnerability€of€the€victim.€€òòSeeóó€òòBinghamóó,€Ô#†XyXXXyÓI#Ô910€S.W.2d€Ô‡XyXXXyÔat€456€(ð ðDenial€of€probation€mayÐ ¸'#& Ðbe€based€solely€upon€the€circumstances€of€the€offense€when€they€are€of€such€a€nature€as€to€outweighÐ ¤(ô#' Ðall€other€factors€favoring€probation.ðð).€€It€also€found€that€some€jail€time€was€appropriate€to€avoidÐ )à$( Ðdepreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(B).€€We€cannotÐ |*Ì%) Ðconclude€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€making€this€determination.Ð h+¸&* Їà  àHaving€concluded€that€the€defendantððs€sentence€was€appropriate,€we€remand€the€matter€forÐ ° Ðentry€of€a€corrected€judgment,€in€view€of€the€apparent€variance€between€the€transcript€of€theÐ œì Ðsentencing€hearing€and€the€judgment.€€Although,€according€to€the€transcript,€the€defendant€was€toÐ ˆØ Ðserve€a€total€of€thirty€days€ð ðin€two€two„week€blocks€between€[€]€school€terms,ðð€which€we€interpretÐ tÄ Ðto€mean€two€fifteen„day€blocks,€the€judgment€provides,€as€a€special€condition:€€ð ð[Defendant]€is€toÐ `° Ðbe€allowed€to€serve€the€30€day€jail€sentence€between€school€terms.ðð€€The€judgment€does€not€provideÐ L œ Ðthat€the€confinement€be€split,€as€the€trial€court€ordered.€€In€such€a€case,€the€transcript€controls.€€òòSeeóóÐ 8 ˆ ÐòòState€v.€Mooreóó,€814€S.W.2d€381,€383€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Accordingly,€we€remand€for€entryÐ $ t Ðof€a€corrected€judgment.Ð  ` Ðà  àÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àò òòòCONCLUSIONÐ è 8  Ðóóó óÌà  àIt€is€clear€from€the€trial€courtððs€comments€that€consideration€was€given€to€the€appropriateÐ À  Ðprinciples,€and€that€the€sentence€was€not€arbitrary.€€Accordingly,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ ¬ü  Ðcourt€but€remand€for€entry€of€a€corrected€judgment.Ð ˜è  ÐÌÌà  àÌà  àò òó óÔ#†XyXXXyÍM#ÔÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð 4„ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE