WPC ,@nhga ?m8PYQ {7]fʇ0ؗuRPQ@hflD8iкtv}qCdt 26k"0UtRTwykG Mowm[z^㽖h#>ٜc_R-T4'8T?|]L!*:GC\;y=Tڢ_kgł]w "l~/4qb h Ҷ'{Ũ9s1}G*15$DujxO7~MKX5n ?Q' %I+*U )TUtTB)jtJjLpZӝaR;j{AG}-É}`]^b}eUJrG淺FU~*/{DA)S|dc^DĈq+b %\^ b 0nU NwD4H\ zk m # 1    j 720Nb 1ud 72E  0c ppppppppppppppppppppppbxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 0 Bkk 0 D3, D-_ 0K AS* 0 0D AQ-s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularPH,ry.opn3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6,,,,0(CEKQW]cioAutoList1A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 A.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0   - -(|G2E$ !.8dd8         0  } d(|3~$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3~$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _  8IXXdd8@ttINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE##Ԉ & @ AssignedonBriefsJuly17,2002 L @ WILLIEJOSEPH_LAGANO_Ԁv.STATEOFTENNESSEE   p XIX@  DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforDavidsonCounty F  @No.3125SethNorman,Judge 2  @*AV) ` dE<` A߈ F    @ No.M200101576CCAR3COFiledOctober15,_2002_Ԉ A  AV) ` dE<` A    Petitioner,WillieJoseph_Lagano_,filedapetitionforwritofhabeascorpusinthetrialcourt.Thetrial  courtsummarilydismissedthepetitionwithoutanevidentiaryhearing.Petitionerappealed.After  athoroughreviewoftherecord,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.  @  TennR.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed.  t ThomasT._Woodall_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJ._Curwood_Ԁ_Witt_ԀandAlan L E.Glenn,JJ.,joined. 8 Bruce_Poag_,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,WillieJoseph_Lagano_. ` PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;HelenaWalton_Yarbrough_,AssistantAttorney 8 General;VictorS.Johnson,III,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andPamAnderson,AssistantDistrict $ AttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee.  @66' OPINION      Inhispetitionforwritofhabeascorpusrelief,Petitionerallegesthathepledguiltyin p"! September1995totheoffensesofaggravatedburglaryandtheft.Hereceivedasentenceofsixyears \#" fortheaggravatedburglaryconvictionsandthreeyearsforthetheft,tobeservedconcurrentlywith H$# eachother,butconsecutivelytoafouryearsentencehereceived inanothercounty.Petitioner 4% $ allegesthathewasthusorderedtoserveaneffectivesentenceoftenyears.Thejudgmentsofthese  &p!% convictionswerenotattachedtothepetition,andnoexplanationwasgivenfortheabsenceofthe  '\"& judgments.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.2921107(b)(2). 'H#'   Althoughallegingvariousconstitutionalviolations,thefactualbasisforPetitioners ) %) complaintisthathewasnotgivenaparolehearingbytheDepartmentofCorrectionbecauseofex * &* postfactoapplicationofastatutewhichprohibitsaparolehearingforaprisonersentencedto +&+ maximumcustody.Petitionerallegesthathewasbeingheldinmaximumcustodybythe ,', DepartmentofCorrection. -(-G _ԇ  Thetrialcourtdismissedthepetitionwithoutanevidentiaryhearing.Initsorderdoingso,  thetrialcourtnotedthatPetitionerhadnotallegedthathisconvictionswerevoidorthathis  sentenceshadexpired.Weagree.    WhiletherighttoseekhabeascorpusreliefisguaranteedbyArticleI,15oftheTennessee ` Constitution,andisgovernedbyTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsections2921101etseq.,habeas L  corpusreliefisavailableonlywhenitappearsfromthefaceofthejudgmentortherecordofthe 8  proceedingsthatatrialcourtiswithoutjurisdictiontosentenceadefendantorthatthedefendants $ t sentenceorotherrestrainthasexpired.Wyattv.State,24S.W.3d319,322(Tenn.2000).  `   IfPetitionerisentitledtoreliefbaseduponthefactsallegedinthepetition,itisnotthrough  8  habeascorpusproceedings.IthaslongbeenthelawinthisStatethat,ifnothinginthepetitionfor $  writofhabeascorpusindicatesthattheconvictionisvoid,orthatthesentencehasexpired,the   petitioncanbedismissedwithoutanevidentiaryhearing.Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619,627   (Tenn.Crim.App.1994);Stateexrel.Wadev.Norvell,1Tenn.Crim.App.447,443S.W.2d839,   840(1969);Tenn.CodeAnn.2921109.Accordingly,weconcludethatthetrialcourtdidnoterr   insummarilydismissingthepetition. p @FF% CONCLUSION  H   Fortheforegoingreasons,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.  p    `     h     ___________________________________ 4    `     h     THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGE