ÿWPC HÃ(éÝÒB$qñ+m\±êåpH±)YâÆÒfÍaî+Ã>("oT¶ÚH•õ3-–0áùFÇéëì~úÕ“kM ˆïN,Ë]ûhêÊO~¡6S²èÓÈŒ¤M'ôÄë@åž±¨ƒÿ‘¿qçVº wö€ë˜'b3v`˜¯¶J8?’+ó®è·ƒ½‰¢•|×4Ü:¿¹¿õ/g_µ æä ³¬ˆj¼v‰ùtnaL¿å™ïfI`ìzˆ¨_h knM÷Â÷ÕD ["è­!XŠî‘¥&"ÝÏXº‡ß¨özžcοÿDT_9–ä=6a4û¢Ù5ï=“Ž™©~q.ƒ«$ïš6Yžág~µöN¿ô†´™‚uܾÇ OR赡²9)±L¦Y-ËPaß7ˆ8³ u#6 Öˆe©Rð|ˆ-i¥¦Ë£ò8|I‘nES‡¨´v÷:äÊEBxÙ¬ïµAF .Õ:¸ZM”K[˜ÆLšzÊK>¾Ø0KV÷Çsï̉ò1®ä"ä›@ý̶Â"¹‹æ&Á…ÁY5—|b7UÏŽÝy¬ÆOôÖäEî3 –Qƒ&͘?¾-4ÿ0Ö^Š9ž¡F_^3¢Ú {àÖ—¤<¡Bb %\^ b 0ˆnU NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÉÐ Ð Æ™ Æ_ Æ%ÆëëN±±±E³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³bµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµ 0ë½½½½ B¨¨ 0¤Å D5i D-ž 0KËË ASÆi 0¤/ 0DÓ A«»kvU/Ï (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularyö.ê:i¢×+003|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜\\IB01S02\CLERKJACÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2üv$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Êù»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôå ò»»Ô d(|3·+$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Êù»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3·+$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Êù»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Êù»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ8€‰WXXdé»»d8Ñà@hhìàÔ‡î3>î»»ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@òò%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†»Êù»îî3>á#ԈРÓ# Ðà@„ „ ìàAssigned€on€Briefs€August€5,€2003ˆÐ öF ÐÌà@‡ ‡ ìàò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòò€óó€v.€CHARLES€Ô_ÔLAWUARYÔ_Ôòòóóó óˆÐ  f ÐÌÔ€X‰WX»»ÊùÔà@, , ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Madison€CountyˆÐ 7 ‡ Ðà@rrìàNo.€01„488€€€€€€Roger€Page,€JudgeˆÐ ! q ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Þ` A߈Ð ß/  ÐÌà@~ ~ ìàNo.€W2002„02739„CCA„R3„CD€€„€Filed€October€17,€Ô_Ô2003Ô_ԈРØ(  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<«` AßÐ ¬ü  Ðó óÌDefendant,€Charles€Ô_ÔLawuaryÔ_Ô,€appeals€from€the€trial€court's€order€revoking€Defendant's€communityÐ ¤ô  Ðcorrections€sentence€and€requiring€him€to€serve€the€sentence€in€incarceration.€€Defendant€argues€thatÐ Ý Ðthe€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€revoking€the€community€corrections€sentence.€€After€a€reviewÐ vÆ Ðof€the€record,€the€briefs€of€the€parties,€and€the€applicable€law,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ _¯ Ðcourt.€€Ð H˜ ÐÌà@ìàò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€Affirmedó óˆÐ j ÐÌòòThomas€T.€Woodall,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòNorma€McGee€Ogleóó€andÐ í= ÐòòRobert€W.€Wedemeyer,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð Ö& ÐÌMichael€D.€Ô_ÔRasnakeÔ_Ô,€Jackson,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Charles€Ô_ÔLawuaryÔ_ÔÐ ¨ø ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€J.€Ross€Dyer,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€JamesÐ zÊ ÐG.€Woodall,€District€Attorney€General;€James€W.€Thompson,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,Ð c³ Ðfor€the€appellee,€the€State€of€Tennessee.Ð L œ ÐÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ "n! ÐÌà  àOn€January€30,€2002,€Defendant€pled€guilty€in€the€Madison€County€Circuit€Court€to€threeÐ ñ#A# Ðmisdemeanor€offenses:€(1)€attempted€leaving€the€scene€of€an€accident€with€injuries;€(2)€drivingÐ Ú$* $ Ðwithout€a€valid€license;€and€(3)€possession€of€marijuana.€€Defendant€received€concurrent€sentences,Ð Ã%!% Ðresulting€in€a€total€effective€sentence€of€11€months€and€29€days€in€the€county€jail.€€The€trial€courtÐ ¬&ü!& Ðsuspended€Defendantððs€sentences€and€ordered€the€sentences€to€be€served€in€the€communityÐ •'å"' Ðcorrections€program.€€On€May€15,€2002,€a€community€corrections€violation€warrant€was€issued.€€TheÐ ~(Î#( Ðfollowing€grounds€for€revocation€were€alleged€in€the€warrant:€(1)€Defendant€failed€to€report€newÐ g)·$) Ðarrests€in€Gibson€County€on€March€7,€2002;€and€(2)€Defendant€was€convicted€on€March€13,€2002,Ð P* %* Ðof€ð ðnew€offensesðð€of€resisting€arrest,€evading€arrest,€and€leaving€the€scene€of€an€accident€in€GibsonÐ 9+‰&+ ÐCounty.€€Ð ",r', Ðâ âÐ  -[(-ý Ðà  àThe€Stateððs€proof€at€the€revocation€hearing€on€September€12„13,€2002,€was€sparse.€€The€StateÐ ° Ðâ âdid€not€present€evidence€that€would€normally€be€introduced€in€a€hearing€concerning€the€allegationsÐ ™é Ðcontained€in€a€violation€warrant€similar€to€the€one€at€issue€in€this€case.€€Despite€a€one„day€recessÐ ‚Ò Ðduring€the€hearing,€the€State€was€unable€to€submit€certified€copies€of€the€judgments€of€convictionÐ k» Ðin€Gibson€County.€€Also,€there€was€no€testimony€or€documentary€evidence€of€the€special€conditionsÐ T¤ Ðand€rules€of€Defendantððs€community€corrections€sentence.€€Ð =  ÐÌà  àFollowing€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€ruled€that€it€was€not€revoking€the€communityÐ  _ Ðcorrections€sentence€based€upon€Defendantððs€alleged€failure€to€report€his€arrests€of€March€7,€2002.€Ð ø H ÐThe€trial€court€did€revoke€the€community€corrections€sentence€based€upon€Defendantððs€convictionsÐ á 1  Ðfor€offenses€committed€while€on€community€corrections,€and€because€of€Defendantððs€ð ðconductÐ Ê   Ðunbecoming€good€citizenship.ðð€€A€defendant€is€entitled€to€notice€of€the€bases€upon€which€the€StateÐ ³  Ðseeks€to€revoke€probation.€€òòÔ_ÔGagnonÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔScarpelliÔ_Ôóó,€411€U.S.€778,€786,€93€S.€Ct.€1756,€1761,€36€L.€Ed.Ð œì  Ð2d€656€(1973);€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔStubblefieldÔ_Ôóó,€953€S.W.2d€223,€225€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997);€Tenn.€CodeÐ …Õ  ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„311€(1997).€€The€requirement€of€notice€applies€in€a€community€corrections€revocationÐ n¾  Ðproceedings€just€as€it€does€in€probation€revocations.€€òòBentley€v.€Stateóó,€938€S.W.2d€706,€714€(Tenn.Ð W§  ÐCrim.€App.€1996).€€Because€there€is€no€evidence€in€the€record€that€ð ðconduct€unbecoming€goodÐ @ Ðcitizenshipðð€was€a€violation€of€any€condition€of€his€community€corrections€sentence,€and€becauseÐ )y Ðthis€alleged€ground€was€not€charged€in€the€violation€warrant,€we€can€readily€dispense€with€that€issueÐ b Ðand€conclude€that€it€is€not€a€proper€basis€to€revoke€Defendantððs€community€corrections€sentence.€€Ð ûK ÐÌà  àTherefore,€we€are€left€to€resolve€whether€Defendantððs€community€corrections€sentence€wasÐ Í Ðproperly€revoked€because€of€his€convictions€for€offenses€committed€while€on€communityÐ ¶ Ðcorrections.€€Defendantððs€aunt,€Rebecca€Jones,€testified€that€Defendant€contacted€her€after€his€arrestÐ Ÿï Ðin€Gibson€County.€€Defendant€was€still€in€the€Gibson€County€jail,€and€he€told€Ms.€Jones€hisÐ ˆØ Ðsituation.€€He€asked€her€to€contact€his€community€corrections€supervisor,€Carla€Rogers,€and€informÐ qÁ ÐMs.€Rogers€that€he€had€ð ðpicked€up€a€charge.ðð€€Ms.€Jones€testified€that€she€made€three€unsuccessfulÐ Zª Ðattempts€to€contact€Ms.€Rogers€by€phone.€€Ð C“ ÐÌà  àFinally,€on€April€1,€2002,€Ms.€Jones€went€to€Ms.€Rogersðð€office.€€Upon€discovering€that€Ms.Ð e ÐRogers€was€not€present,€Ms.€Jones€left€a€note€to€Ms.€Rogers€on€a€ð ðclient€contact€form.ðð€€This€formÐ þN Ðwas€admitted€as€an€exhibit.€€Ms.€Jones€acknowledged€that€she€wrote€the€information€in€theÐ ç 7 Ðð ðcommentsðð€section€of€the€report,€and€testified€that€she€wrote€what€the€Defendant€had€told€her.€€TheÐ Ð!   Ðcomments€section€states€ð ð[Defendant]€is€presently€in€Gibson€County€jail€for€90€days.€€He€was€ridingÐ ¹" ! Ðwith€someone€who€had€a€[sic]€accident.€€Charges€are€30€days€leaving€the€scene,€30€days€resistingÐ ¢#ò" Ðarrest,€and€30€days€evading€arrest.ðð€€Ð ‹$Û# ÐÌà  àOfficer€Bruce€Dodd€of€the€Humboldt€police€department€testified€concerning€DefendantððsÐ ]&­!% Ðarrest€on€March€7,€2002.€€Officer€Dodd€was€not€specifically€asked,€nor€did€he€offer,€testimony€as€toÐ F'–"& Ðthe€specific€charges€placed€against€Defendant€on€March€7,€2002.€€Moreover,€the€officer€did€notÐ /(#' Ðtestify€that€these€charges€were€filed€in€Gibson€County.€€We€can€take€judicial€notice,€however,€thatÐ )h$( ÐHumboldt€is€entirely€within€Gibson€County.€€Tenn.€R.€Ô_ÔEvidÔ_Ô.€201(b).€€Officer€Dodd€stated€thatÐ *Q%) ÐDefendant€and€another€male€were€stopped€while€walking€on€the€Highway€45€bypass€forÐ ê*:&* Ðinvestigation€of€leaving€a€wrecked€car€nearby.€€Dodd€also€testified€that€Defendant€broke€away€fromÐ Ó+#'+ Ðanother€officer€with€Dodd€when€Defendant€was€placed€into€custody,€and€that€Defendant€and€hisÐ ° Ðcompanion€both€ran€away€into€a€nearby€swamp,€where€they€were€later€apprehended.€€These€factsÐ ™é Ðsupport€a€strong€inference€that€Defendant€was€arrested€in€Gibson€County€on€March€7,€2002€for€theÐ ‚Ò Ðoffenses€of€leaving€the€scene€of€an€accident,€resisting€arrest,€and€evading€arrest.€€The€testimony€ofÐ k» ÐMs.€Jones€of€what€Defendant€told€her€regarding€his€situation€also€supports€a€strong€inference€thatÐ T¤ ÐDefendant€was€convicted€in€Gibson€County€on€March€13,€2002,€and€was€serving€a€90„day€sentenceÐ =  Ðas€a€result€of€the€March€7,€2002€charges.€€Ð & v ÐÌà  àDefendant€complains€on€appeal€that€the€trial€court€relied€upon€unreliable€hearsay€in€revokingÐ ø H Ðthe€community€corrections€sentence.€€The€testimony€of€Ms.€Jones€was€not€inadmissible€hearsayÐ á 1  Ðbecause€it€was€an€admission€by€Defendant.€€Tenn.€R.€Ô_ÔEvidÔ_Ô.€803(1.2).€€Defendant€did€not€object€toÐ Ê   Ðthe€testimony€of€Ms.€Rogers€that€Defendant€was€òòarrestedóó€in€Gibson€County€on€March€7,€2002.€€TheÐ ³  Ðtestimony€of€Officer€Dodd€was€based€entirely€upon€what€Dodd€personally€observed€at€the€time€ofÐ œì  ÐDefendantððs€arrest€on€March€7,€2002,€and€was€therefore€not€hearsay.€€Ð …Õ  ÐÌà  àOur€supreme€court€has€held€that€in€deciding€whether€to€revoke€a€community€correctionsÐ W§  Ðsentence,€courts€should€apply€the€same€principles€utilized€in€probation€revocations.€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔHarkinsÔ_Ôóó,Ð @ Ð811€S.W.2d€79€(Tenn.€1991).€€A€trial€court€may€revoke€a€sentence€of€probation€upon€a€finding€byÐ )y Ða€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€person€has€violated€a€condition€of€probation.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ b ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„311(e)€(Supp.€2002).€€The€decision€to€revoke€probation€rests€within€the€soundÐ ûK Ðdiscretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòState€v.€Mitchellóó,€810€S.W.2d€733,€735€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€Ð ä4 ÐRevocation€of€probation€and€a€community€corrections€sentence€is€subject€to€an€abuse€of€discretionÐ Í Ðstandard€of€review,€rather€than€a€òòde€novoóó€standard.€€òòÔ_ÔHarkinsÔ_Ôóó,€811€S.W.2d€at€82.€€Discretion€is€abusedÐ ¶ Ðonly€if€the€record€contains€no€substantial€evidence€to€support€the€trial€courtððs€conclusion€that€aÐ Ÿï Ðviolation€of€probation€or€community€correction€sentence€has€occurred.€€òòIdóó.;€òòState€v.€Gregoryóó,€946Ð ˆØ ÐS.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€€Proof€of€a€violation€need€not€be€established€beyond€aÐ qÁ Ðreasonable€doubt,€and€the€evidence€need€only€show€that€the€trial€judge€exercised€a€conscientious€andÐ Zª Ðintelligent€judgment,€and€did€not€act€arbitrarily.€òòGregoryóó,€946€S.W.2d€at€832;€òòState€v.€Leachóó,€914Ð C“ ÐS.W.2d€104,€106€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€If€the€trial€court€finds€that€the€defendant€has€violatedÐ ,| Ðthe€conditions€of€probation,€the€court€may€ð ðcommence€the€execution€of€the€judgment€as€originallyÐ e Ðentered€.€.€.€.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(e)€(Supp.€2002).€€Ð þN ÐÌà  àWhile€the€State€did€not€offer€the€strongest€evidence€possible€in€support€of€the€revocation€ofÐ Ð!   ÐDefendantððs€community€corrections€sentence,€the€record€reflects€that€the€State€introduced€evidence,Ð ¹" ! Ðalthough€circumstantial,€that€Defendant€was€convicted€for€ð ðnew€offensesðð€which€were€committedÐ ¢#ò" Ðwhile€he€was€serving€a€community€corrections€sentence.€€Although€the€State€did€not€submit€anyÐ ‹$Û# Ðdocumentation€of€the€rules€and€conditions€of€Defendantððs€supervised€community€correctionsÐ t%Ä $ Ðsentence,€implicit€in€any€sentence€involving€release€in€the€community€is€the€requirement€that€aÐ ]&­!% Ðdefendant€not€commit€new€crimes.€€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€in€this€appeal.€€Ð F'–"& ÐÌÌÌÓ  Óò òCONCLUSIONÐ ê*:&* ÐÐ Ô+$'+ ÐÓ  Óó óà0  àFor€the€reasons€stated€herein,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€Ð°(#(# ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð k» Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGE