ÿWPCF bG÷4+Ï Ó}Æ´¦ÏN ó|Î_/ÌQ6 ›ºí–+ ÎÝÃ11—ƪV“Á›Œ¡î'{’e}?KyZÁЗj÷Õü©ä$£À⮈‹?·\!¦#ÓØ+j z§Çä›àâã¿À„·™ˆçuÙÿð;®Ê¹mùÈÙª#¼àdrôœ£Rèy¹¦+{ó…Ÿ1^XiݳÈjZZdE<ܽ&¤eFšk¾Ë£vÏV™¶`1æš\Ùœ3é^´C‡LLµìõ,aýXŠK¦µÇ/¿ÐüÃha£ož»¿aëAËî5KBeëæˆ\`µ1jçÍéŸ&³8>=Gí41-D³<üÜ*B(@™÷BIˆÌGWH%¢Œ§•([òÞͱÚé ˆ¼>¸nGòýŸë®CqDzè¯x ›à6ÝF²—£Q¯ øƒÖ4Ί×e;\}DËß…Ãq"kþ½ô(ÖúàZÊå ¾‡&xw—=²JsØGû´à ¼Žüë‹Tc++Ù5é"—1߉ž½Â𥇬k5+4 _6N®s™ºT{m‡VÜtY<ÁnÕBÔ(Ùžmö'E;€žòýeKÅVSYÿ C Ldùà„Ûm²¢ù(Š£¤ü¯Z^(E÷dŽbN\ %^ 0ˆdUNì z:Ò´^ † z’ Ò wÞ 4â ö  Æ ÆÍ Æ“ ÆY mN6#Á8U@ùE999999999999999999999999b;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; 0ëCCCC B.. 0¤K D3ï D-" 0KOO ASšÆí 0¤³ 0DW A«›»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt}¥)  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÖJ~'rtyBar€š¥3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman - ù-(|G2ɶ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ P»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôz„ò»»Ô d(|3Nf$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ P»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Nf$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ P»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ P»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ P»»»ÔÑ8€f¬XXdæ»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î!C PÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼ P»îî!C #ԈРР ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€September€20,€2000€Ð ð@ ÐÔ‡Xf¬X»¼ PÔÌò òÔ#†¼ P»XXf¬$#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€ANTHONY€Ô_ÔLAYNEÔ_ÔÔ‡Xf¬X»¼ PÔó óÐ ä4 ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€as€of€Right€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Coffee€CountyÐ Ø ( Ðà@@øøìàNo.€27,741M€€€€€€Gerald€L.€Ewell€Sr.,€JudgeÐ ¾  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<o` AßÐ pÀ  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M1997„00025„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€December€29,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ eµ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<0` AßÐ 1  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€appellant,€Anthony€Ô_ÔLayneÔ_Ô,€was€convicted€by€a€jury€in€the€Coffee€County€Circuit€Court€of€oneÐ &v  Ðcount€of€criminal€trespass,€a€class€C€misdemeanor,€and€one€count€of€theft€of€property€less€than€$500,Ð  \ Ða€class€A€misdemeanor.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€appellant€to€thirty€days€incarceration€in€theÐ òB ÐCoffee€County€Jail€for€the€criminal€trespass€conviction.€€The€trial€court€also€sentenced€the€appellantÐ Ø( Ðto€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€incarceration€in€the€Coffee€County€Jail€for€the€theftÐ ¾ Ðconviction€and€assessed€a€$1000€fine.€€The€appellant€raises€the€following€issue€for€our€review:Ð ¤ô Ðwhether€the€evidence€in€this€case€was€sufficient€to€support€the€appellantððs€convictions.€€Upon€reviewÐ ŠÚ Ðof€the€record€and€the€partiesðð€briefs,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð pÀ ÐÓãÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€is€Affirmed.ó óÐ <Œ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ P»àXf¬³#ÔÔ‡Xf¬X.¼ PÔNorma€McGee€Ogle,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Wellesóó€and€òòJoe€G.Ð X ÐRiley,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð î> ÐÌRobert€S.€Peters,€Winchester,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Anthony€Ô_ÔLayneÔ_Ô.Ð º  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter,€Elizabeth€T.€Ryan,€Assistant€Attorney€General,€Ð † Ö  ÐC.€Michael€Ô_ÔLayneÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General,€and€Steve€Ô_ÔWeitzmanÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ l!¼! ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð R"¢" ÐÓ; ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ P»XXf¬j #ÔÔ‡Xf¬X»¼ PÔÐ $n$ ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼ P»XXf¬n #ÔÔ‡Xf¬X»¼ PÔÓ  Óà@'' ìàòòò òI.€Factual€Backgroundóóó óˆÐ ê%:!& Ðà  àà ` àÔ#†¼ P»XXf¬Ì #ÔÔ€Xf¬X»¼ PÔOn€February€22,€1996,€at€approximately€11€p.m.,€Dwight€Ô_ÔAlfordÔ_Ô€noticed€a€truck€turnÐ Ð& "' Ðinto€the€driveway€of€the€house€he€was€building.€€The€house€was€located€at€the€end€of€a€driveway€thatÐ ¶'#( Ðwas€approximately€400€feet€long.€€The€entrance€to€the€driveway€was€marked€by€a€few€steel€postsÐ œ(ì#) Ðwith€a€rope€running€from€post€to€post.€€According€to€Ô_ÔAlfordÔ_Ô,€the€last€member€of€the€constructionÐ ‚)Ò$* Ðcrew€to€leave€the€property€was€to€hang€the€rope€from€post€to€post,€obstructing€the€entrance€to€theÐ h*¸%+ Ðdriveway.€€Ô_ÔAlfordÔ_Ô€could€not€testify€that€the€rope€had€been€hung€on€the€day€in€question.€€He€alsoÐ N+ž&, Ðadmitted€that€the€property€was€not€posted€with€ð ðno€trespassingðð€signs.€€Ô_ÔAlfordÔ_Ô€testified€that€on€theÐ 4,„'- Ðevening€of€February€22,€1996,€he€watched€as€the€truck€proceeded€toward€the€house,€turned€around,Ð -j(.ý ÐÔ_Ôand€left.€€He€then€saw€the€truck€return€and€approach€his€vehicle.€€Alford€stated€that,€as€the€truckÐ ° Ðapproached€his€vehicle,€he€saw€the€truckððs€lights€go€out,€and€the€truck€proceeded€out€of€the€drivewayÐ –æ Ðat€a€high€rate€of€speed.€€As€the€truck€came€out€of€the€driveway,€the€truck€bounced,€and€a€ladder€fellÐ |Ì Ðoff€the€truck.€€Alford€followed€the€truck€until€it€was€stopped€at€a€roadblock€near€the€Oak€Market€onÐ b² ÐInterstate€Drive€in€Manchester.€€While€following€the€truck,€Alford€had€called€911€to€notify€theÐ H˜ ÐSheriffððs€Department.Ð . ~ ÐÌà  àà ` àSeveral€police€officers€testified€concerning€the€stop€of€the€truck.€€Officer€Victor€Jones,Ð ú J ÐOfficer€Frankie€Yates,€and€Officer€Mike€Jarvis€testified€that€the€appellant€was€the€driver€of€the€truck.€Ð à 0 ÐThere€were€two€passengers€in€the€truck,€a€young€man€and€a€young€woman.Ð Æ   ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€ladder€that€fell€from€the€truck€was€later€found€by€Alford€in€a€grassy€area€aboutÐ ’â  Ðseventy„five€yards€east€of€his€driveway.€€Howard€Ridner€of€Howard€Ridner€Construction€CompanyÐ xÈ  Ðtestified€that€the€ladder€that€Alford€found€belonged€to€Ridner€and€was€being€used€at€the€AlfordÐ ^®  Ðconstruction€site.€€He€stated€that€the€value€of€the€ladder€was€$100.Ð D”  ÐÌà  àà ` àStacey€OððNeal€testified€for€the€appellant€that€she€and€Michael€Nunley€were€with€theÐ ` Ðappellant€on€the€evening€of€February€22,€1996.€€They€had€met€in€Tracy€City€and€decided€to€drive€toÐ öF ÐManchester.€€After€eating€at€a€fast€food€restaurant€in€Manchester,€they€drove€out€WoodburyÐ Ü, ÐHighway.€€They€drove€into€Alfordððs€driveway€in€order€to€turn€around.€€As€they€left€the€driveway,Ð Â Ða€vehicle€approached€on€the€driveway.€€They€went€around€the€vehicle.€€The€vehicle€turned€aroundÐ ¨ø Ðand€followed€them€until€they€were€stopped€at€a€roadblock.€€OððNeal€denied€that€anyone€had€taken€aÐ ŽÞ Ðladder€from€the€Alford€property.€€She€also€denied€seeing€a€ladder€fall€from€the€truck.€€Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àà ` àA€jury€in€the€Coffee€County€Circuit€Court€convicted€the€appellant€of€one€count€ofÐ @ Ðcriminal€trespass,€a€class€C€misdemeanor,€and€one€count€of€theft€of€property€less€than€$500,€a€classÐ &v ÐA€misdemeanor.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€appellant€to€thirty€days€incarceration€in€the€CoffeeÐ  \ ÐCounty€Jail€for€the€criminal€trespass€conviction.€€The€trial€court€also€sentenced€the€appellant€toÐ òB Ðeleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€incarceration€in€the€Coffee€County€Jail€for€the€theft€convictionÐ Ø( Ðand€assessed€a€$1000€fine.€€On€appeal,€the€appellant€raises€the€following€issue€for€our€review:Ð ¾ Ðwhether€the€evidence€in€this€case€was€sufficient€to€support€the€appellantððs€convictions.Ð ¤ô ÐÌà@$ìàòòò òII.€Analysisóóó óˆÐ p!À  Ðà  àà ` àÔ‡Xf¬XXXf¬ÔWhen€challenging€a€conviction€on€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€grounds,€the€appellantÐ V"¦! Ðmust€establish€that€no€reasonable€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€offenseÐ <#Œ" Ðbeyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319,€99€S.Ct.€2781,€2789€(1979);Ð "$r# ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).Ô#†Xf¬XXXf¬W#ÔÔ‡Xf¬XXXf¬Ô€€Our€supreme€court€has€found€that€ð ða€guilty€verdict,€approved€by€the€trialÐ %X $ Ðjudge,€accredits€the€testimony€of€the€Stateððs€witnesses€and€resolves€all€conflicts€in€testimony€in€favorÐ î%>!% Ðof€the€theory€of€the€State.ðð€€òòState€v.€Hatchettóó,€560€S.W.2d€627,€630€(Tenn.€1978).€€Accordingly,€onÐ Ô&$"& Ðappeal€the€State€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€produced€at€trial€and€allÐ º' #' Ðreasonable€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€that€evidence.€òòState€v.€Williamsóó,€657€S.W.2d€405,Ð  (ð#( Ð410€(Tenn.€1983).€€Ô#†Xf¬XXXf¬ #ÔÔ‡Xf¬XXXf¬ÔMoreover,€a€jury€conviction€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence€the€appellantÐ †)Ö$) Ðenjoyed€at€trial€and€replaces€it€on€appeal€with€a€presumption€of€guilt;€therefore,€the€appellant€carriesÐ l*¼%* Ðthe€burden€of€demonstrating€to€this€court€why€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€juryððsÐ R+¢&+ Ðfindings.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).€€Ð 8,ˆ', Їà  àà ` àIn€order€to€sustain€the€appellantððs€conviction€of€criminal€trespass,€the€State€neededÐ ° Ðto€prove€that€the€appellant€entered€Alfordððs€property,€knowing€that€he€did€not€have€Alfordððs€effectiveÐ –æ Ðconsent€to€do€so.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„405(1997).€€The€testimony€of€the€Stateððs€witnesses€atÐ |Ì Ðtrial€established€that€the€appellant€twice€entered€Alfordððs€property.€There€were€steel€posts€locatedÐ b² Ðat€the€entrance€to€the€driveway.€€Additionally,€the€driveway€led€to€what€was€obviously€a€privateÐ H˜ Ðresidence.€Moreover,€upon€noticing€Alfordððs€vehicle€approaching€his€truck,€the€appellant€turned€offÐ . ~ Ðthe€lights€of€his€truck€and€sped€away,€hitting€a€bump€with€such€force€that€a€ladder€fell€from€the€truck.€Ð  d ÐWe€conclude€that,€based€upon€these€facts,€a€reasonable€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€appellantÐ ú J Ðguilty€of€criminal€trespass.Ô#†Xf¬XXXf¬¼"#ÔÐ à 0 ÐÌà  àà ` àAdditionally,€to€convict€the€appellant€of€theft,€the€State€needed€to€prove€that€theÐ ¬ ü  Ðappellant€obtained€or€exercised€control€over€the€property€of€another€having€a€value€of€less€than€$500,Ð ’â  Ðwith€the€intent€to€deprive€the€owner€of€the€property€and€without€the€ownerððs€effective€consent.€€Tenn.Ð xÈ  ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€39„14„103,€„105(1)(1997).€€Alford€testified€that€he€witnessed€a€ladder€fall€from€theÐ ^®  Ðappellantððs€truck.€€Alford€later€found€the€ladder€approximately€seventy„five€yards€east€of€hisÐ D”  Ðdriveway.€€Additionally,€Ridner€testified€that€he€owned€the€ladder€that€Alford€found,€that€the€ladderÐ *z  Ðhad€been€at€the€construction€site€at€Alfordððs€house,€and€that€the€ladder€was€worth€$100.€€We€find€thatÐ ` Ðthis€evidence€is€sufficient€for€a€jury€to€find€that€the€appellant€committed€the€offense€of€theft.€Ð öF ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellant€specifically€argues€that€OððNeal€testified€that€the€appellant€turned€westÐ Â Ðupon€leaving€the€Alford€residence.€€The€appellant€emphasizes€that€the€ladder€was€found€east€ofÐ ¨ø ÐAlfordððs€driveway.€€€Thus,€the€appellant€argues,€the€evidence€is€in€conflict€so€as€to€suggest€theÐ ŽÞ Ðappellantððs€innocence.€€Conflicts€in€the€testimony€produced€at€trial€are€to€be€resolved€by€the€trier€ofÐ tÄ Ðfact€and€not€this€court.€€òòState€v.€Foxóó,€733€S.W.2d€116,€117€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€The€juryÐ Zª Ðobviously€discredited€the€appellantððs€witness€and€instead€chose€to€believe€the€Stateððs€witnesses.€€òòSeeóóÐ @ ÐòòState€v.€Boldenóó,€No.€288,€1989€WL€98090,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€August€24,€1989).€Ð &v ÐWe€will€not€reweigh€or€reevaluate€this€evidence.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ð  \ ÐÌà@MM"ìàòòò òIII.€€Conclusionóóó óˆÐ Ø( Ðà  àà ` àBased€upon€the€foregoing,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð ¾ ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð Š Ú Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNORMA€McGEE€OGLE,€JUDGE