ÿWPCH êvRŠy{€r¸2…yZ\® ô×s¤¾QT¥ï³;EJt<¢$F…eSOný$“›ÆÒÆ]•±0³ÈtÏ•% ¨÷xÿ‰_Àúõr¸½Ë@À#NKž¼» ’)-‘R·òÓÙo#z\ÙòBZ1¢åĬÔ%«d©i3 òéþ§JhY‡/±¶–ͳþ¿äQÏg#ÖäcнÌ4 _)Tz „AyÕ¼k¡~ÀÚ±;2ZÙF½‰EÒ±º¶iBHœ^šÆa“®Œi…–CÕ—q‰18Fܽ}6Wë`mLg€bà8/1ÐñÜW#º¶âz;4fØ¢ý÷˜]]9¢íÞPÂ2Xu¾c¡þä¼^ŸM^7©ÅÒ»‚Åüùüæ.׬Ò=Μ¬XÑH½5wøÅ‹ÄˆÓd5mn-ŽCJQ 3z”¶u¼ŠTX+§Fß=lG„ª¯/±±^Ukr”n»ÝÿÀïíORWq´7ïóŒp¤wº½ ê(ödàk+RŸ¸†¾ÏÖAj–Ëž° Ðâ¤ÒѺZp÷);Ô2C(HÒÆð˜ëâ<îqFä++=¬²Ú¨#¯¾BX9kÕbu8QÄsq8å˜4qåP"õSËCŽ JÄû<7/b %\U@b 0ˆ¢UN*^ xw„4ˆ zœÒ è ÷ mù #Á ÆÑ Æ— Æ] Æ#UNéN799EAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 0DC¶‡b==================================== 0ëEEEE B00 0¤M D3ñ D-$ 0KQQ ASœÆï 0¤µ 0DY A«»(ƒð Z‹(Times New Roman (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular…¦.+ ÖJ~'ROGRAMS¥ ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular (#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ¬Ý ƒR1%$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¥Ýò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔIn€his€brief,€the€Defendant€divides€his€argument€into€five€issues.€€We€have€consolidated€the€Defendantððs€issuesÐ ° Ðone€and€two,€regarding€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€presented€at€trial,€and€issues€four€and€five,€regarding€sentencing,Ð tÄ Ðfor€clarity€and€economy.- ù-(|G21%$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€µ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¥Ýò»»Ô d(|3¿u$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€µ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3¿u$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€µ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€µ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼µ»»»ÔÑ8€MéXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î¤î»¼µÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼µ»îî¤ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€August€15,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XMéX»¼µÔÌò òÔ#†¼µ»XXMé #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€ADRIAN€S.€LENNOXÔ‡XMéX»¼µÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€99„C„1752€€€€€€Steve€Dozier,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2000„02869„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€14,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡XMéXXXMéÔThe€Defendant,€Adrian€S.€Lennox,€was€convicted€by€a€jury€of€aggravated€burglary,€vandalism,€felonyÐ xÈ  Ðevading€arrest€and€driving€on€a€revoked€license.€€The€Defendant€was€then€sentenced€as€a€Range€IIÐ d´ Ðoffender€to€nine€years€on€the€aggravated€burglary€conviction,€three€years€on€the€vandalismÐ P  Ðconviction,€five€years€on€the€felony€evading€arrest€conviction,€and€six€months€on€the€conviction€forÐ <Œ Ðdriving€on€a€revoked€license.€€The€trial€court€ordered€that€the€aggravated€burglary€and€the€felonyÐ (x Ðevading€sentences€run€consecutively.€€On€appeal,€the€Defendant€argues€that€(1)€the€evidence€isÐ d Ðinsufficient€to€support€the€Defendantððs€convictions,€(2)€the€trial€court€improperly€denied€theÐ P ÐDefendantððs€motion€for€the€preparation€of€trial€transcripts€prior€to€his€motion€for€new€trial€hearing,Ð ì< Ðand€(3)€the€trial€court€improperly€sentenced€the€Defendant.׃-×Ý ƒ,#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô#†XMéXXXMé»#ÔÔ#†¼µ»XXMéŒ#ÔÔ‡XMéX»¼µÔ€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ Ø( Ðcourt.Ð Ä ÐÓ¯ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ œì ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼µ»àXMé` #ÔÔ‡XMéX.¼µÔDavid€H.€Welles,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoe€G.€Rileyóó€and€òòJamesÐ tÄ ÐÔ_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð `° ÐÌÔ_ÔJefreÔ_Ô€S.€Ô_ÔGoldtrapÔ_Ô,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Adrian€S.€Lennox.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€David€H.€Ô_ÔFindleyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð #`" ÐVictor€S.€Johnson,€District€Attorney€General;€and€J.€Carlton€Ô_ÔDrumwrightÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ ü#L# ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð è$8 $ ÐÓR ÓÌÐ  À&"&ýG Ðà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼µ»XXMé #ÔòòóóÔ‡XMéX»¼µÔÐ ° ÐÓ  ÓÓÓÔ#†¼µ»XXMé#ÔÔ€XMéX»¼µÔòòÔ‡XMéXXXMéÔóóÌÓÓà  àOn€March,€20,€1999,€Patricia€Cantrell€was€sunbathing€in€her€backyard€when€she€heard€a€carÐ tÄ Ðpull€into€her€neighborððs€driveway.€€Through€a€bush€between€the€two€houses,€Ms.€Cantrell€saw€theÐ `° Ðfeet€of€a€man€approach€the€back€door€and€knock.€€A€few€seconds€later,€Ms.€Cantrell€heard€the€soundÐ L œ Ðof€breaking€glass,€and€ran€to€her€house€to€call€the€police.€€While€talking€to€the€911€operator,€Ms.Ð 8 ˆ ÐCantrell€saw€the€back€of€a€man€exit€the€house€with€a€television€set€and€drive€away.€€Ms.€Cantrell€wasÐ $ t Ðable€to€describe€the€car€to€the€911€operator€as€the€car€was€leaving.€€She€described€it€as€an€older€modelÐ  ` Ðsedan€with€a€wheel€cover€on€the€back.€€After€the€Defendant€was€arrested,€Ms.€Cantrell€identified€theÐ ü L  ÐDefendantððs€car€as€the€car€she€had€seen€at€her€neighborððs€house.Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àOnly€a€mile€away,€Officer€Michael€Adkins€of€the€Metro„Davidson€Police€Department€wasÐ À  Ðnotified€about€the€burglary.€€As€Officer€Adkins€approached€a€stoplight,€he€noticed€a€car€with€aÐ ¬ü  Ðtelevision€in€the€back€seat€€matching€the€description€of€the€car€seen€by€Ms.€Cantrell.€€When€OfficerÐ ˜è  ÐAdkins€attempted€to€pull€the€car€over,€the€car€crossed€into€oncoming€traffic€and€turned€down€a€sideÐ „Ô  Ðstreet.€€With€Officer€Adkins€in€pursuit,€the€car€turned€into€a€driveway€of€a€private€residence,€droveÐ pÀ Ðthrough€a€carport€and€into€the€backyard€of€the€residence.€€The€car€then€crossed€into€the€backyard€ofÐ \¬ ÐWalter€Edwards€who€was€working€in€his€garden€at€the€time.€€The€car€came€within€forty€feet€of€Mr.Ð H˜ ÐEdwards€and€then€struck€a€dogwood€tree,€pulling€the€tree€up€by€the€roots.€€The€Defendant€then€exitedÐ 4„ Ðthe€car,€and,€after€a€short€foot€chase,€was€apprehended.€€The€Defendantððs€hand€was€bleeding€and€heÐ  p Ðtold€Officer€Adkins€that€he€knew€he€was€caught€because€his€blood€was€at€the€scene€of€the€burglary.€Ð  \ ÐPolice€found€a€television,€a€VCR,€a€camera,€a€crowbar,€and€a€pair€of€pliers€in€the€Defendantððs€car.Ð øH ÐÌà  àCarl€Dupree,€the€victim,€was€notified€by€police€that€his€home€had€been€burglarized.€€UponÐ Ð  Ðreturning€home,€Mr.€Dupree€discovered€that€his€back€door€had€been€kicked€in,€the€glass€was€broken,Ð ¼  Ðand€his€television€was€missing.€Mr.€Dupree€also€discovered€blood€stains€on€the€door€and€inside€theÐ ¨ø Ðhouse.€€Mr.€Dupree€was€later€taken€to€Mr.€Edwardððs€backyard,€where€the€Defendant€had€beenÐ ”ä Ðapprehended,€and€identified€the€television€in€the€Defendantððs€back€seat€as€his€own.€€The€repair€of€Mr.Ð €Ð ÐDupreeððs€door€cost€about€$1,000.Ð l¼ ÐòòóóÌÓ  Óò òI.€€SUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEó óÐ D!” ÐÓKÓÓcÓà  àThe€Defendant€contends€that€the€evidence€presented€at€trial€was€insufficient€to€support€hisÐ 0"€  Ðconvictions,€and,€therefore,€the€trial€court€erred€in€overruling€the€Defendantððs€motion€forÐ #l! Ðjudgment€of€acquittal.€€After€a€thorough€review€of€the€record,€we€find€that€the€evidence€isÐ $X" Ðsufficient€to€support€the€convictions,€and€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€ruling.Ð ô$D # ÐÌÓ¡ÓÓ  Óà  àTennessee€Rule€of€Appellate€Procedure€13(e)€prescribes€that€ð ð[f]indings€of€guilt€in€criminalÐ Ì&"% Ðactions€whether€by€the€trial€court€or€jury€shall€be€set€aside€if€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€supportÐ ¸'#& Ðthe€findings€by€the€trier€of€fact€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ðð€€Evidence€is€sufficient€if,€afterÐ ¤(ô#' Ðreviewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€couldÐ )à$( Ðhave€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòSeeóó€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,Ð |*Ì%) Ð443€U.S.€307,€319€(1979);€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€24€S.W.3d€274,€278€(Tenn.€2000).€€In€addition,€becauseÐ h+¸&* Ðconviction€by€a€trier€of€fact€destroys€the€presumption€of€innocence€and€imposes€a€presumption€ofÐ ° Ðguilt,€a€convicted€criminal€defendant€bears€the€burden€of€showing€that€the€evidence€was€insufficient.€Ð œì ÐòòSeeóó€òòMcBee€v.€Stateóó,€372€S.W.2d€173,€176€(Tenn.€1963);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Buggsóó,€995€S.W.2d€102,Ð ˆØ Ð105„06€(Tenn.€1999);€òòState€v.€Evansóó,€838€S.W.2d€185,€191€(Tenn.€1992);òòóó€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639Ð tÄ ÐS.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).òòóóÐ `° ÐÌà  àIn€its€review€of€the€evidence,€an€appellate€court€must€afford€the€State€ð ðthe€strongest€legitimateÐ 8 ˆ Ðview€of€the€evidence€as€well€as€all€reasonable€and€legitimate€inferences€that€may€be€drawnÐ $ t Ðtherefrom.ðð€€òòTuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€at€914;òòóó€òòsee€alsoóó€òòSmithóó,€24€S.W.3d€at€279.€€The€court€may€not€ð ðre„Ð  ` Ðweigh€or€re„evaluate€the€evidenceðð€in€the€record€below.€€òòEvansóó,€838€S.W.2d€at€191;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòBuggsóó,Ð ü L  Ð995€S.W.2d€at€105.òòóó€€Likewise,€should€the€reviewing€court€find€particular€conflicts€in€the€trialÐ è 8  Ðtestimony,€the€court€must€resolve€them€in€favor€of€the€jury€verdict€or€trial€court€judgment.€€òòTuggleóó,Ð Ô$  Ð639€S.W.2d€at€914.€€All€questions€involving€the€credibility€of€witnesses,€the€weight€and€value€to€beÐ À  Ðgiven€the€evidence,€and€all€factual€issues€are€resolved€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€the€appellate€courts.€Ð ¬ü  ÐòòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Morrisóó,€24€S.W.3d€788,€795€(Tenn.€2000);€€òòState€v.€Pappasóó,€754€S.W.2d€620,€623€(Tenn.Ð ˜è  ÐCrim.€App.€1987).Ð „Ô  ÐÔ#†XMéXXXMé«#Ôò òÔ‡XMéXXXMéÔó óÌòòÓ  ÓAggravated€BurglaryóóÐ \¬ ÐÓÀ&Óà  àA€person€commits€aggravated€burglary€who€enters€a€habitation,€without€the€permission€ofÐ H˜ Ðthe€property€owner,€and€ð ðcommits€or€attempts€to€commit€a€felony,€theft€or€assault.ðð€€Tenn.€CodeÐ 4„ ÐAnn.€ðððð€39„14„402€(a)(3),€39„14„403.€€A€habitation€is€ð ðany€structure,€including€buildings,€moduleÐ  p Ðunits,€mobile€homes,€trailers,€and€tents,€which€is€designed€or€adapted€for€the€overnightÐ  \ Ðaccommodation€of€persons.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„401€(1)(A).Ð øH ÐÌà  àThe€Defendantððs€car€was€seen€pulling€into€the€victimððs€driveway€shortly€before€Ms.€CantrellÐ Ð  Ðheard€breaking€glass.€€Ms.€Cantrell€then€saw€the€back€of€a€person€getting€into€the€Defendantððs€carÐ ¼  Ðwith€a€television€set.€€The€Defendant€was€then€seen€a€mile€from€the€victimððs€home€with€the€victimððsÐ ¨ø Ðtelevision€in€the€backseat€of€his€car.€€After€an€unsuccessful€attempt€to€elude€the€police,€the€defendantÐ ”ä Ðconfessed€to€the€crime€on€two€separate€occasions.€€The€victim€testified€at€trial€that€he€did€not€knowÐ €Ð Ðthe€Defendant€and€did€not€give€the€Defendant€permission€to€enter€his€home€and€take€the€television.Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€has€not€met€his€burden€of€showing€that€the€evidence€presented€at€trial€wasÐ D!” Ðinsufficient€to€support€his€conviction€for€aggravated€burglary.€€We€conclude€that€the€evidenceÐ 0"€  Ðpresented€was€sufficient€to€support€the€finding€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.Ð #l! ÐÌòòÓ  ÓVandalismóóÐ ô$D # ÐÓ-Óà  àA€person€commits€the€crime€of€vandalism€who€knowingly€causes€damage€to€or€destroys€realÐ à%0!$ Ðor€personal€property€of€another€without€the€ownerððs€consent.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„408€(a).€Ð Ì&"% ÐThe€evidence€at€trial,€as€discussed€above,€established€that€the€Defendant€forcibly€entered€the€victimððsÐ ¸'#& Ðhome.€€The€evidence€further€showed€that€the€victimððs€door€was€damaged€extensively,€requiring€aÐ ¤(ô#' Ðreplacement€door€at€a€cost€of€$1,000.€€The€evidence€presented€at€trial€is€sufficient€to€support€theÐ )à$( ÐDefendantððs€conviction€for€vandalism.Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* ÐòòÓ  ÓFelony€Evading€ArrestóóÐ ° ÐÓ|0Óà  àFelony€evading€arrest€is€defined€as€follows:Ð œì Ðà8  àIt€is€unlawful€for€any€person,€while€operating€a€motor€vehicle€on€any€street,€road,Ð ˆØ Ðalley€or€highway€in€this€state,€to€intentionally€flee€or€attempt€to€elude€any€lawÐ tÄ Ðenforcement€officer,€after€having€received€any€signal€from€such€officer€to€bring€theÐ `° Ðvehicle€to€a€stop.ÐL œÐ Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„16„603€(b)(1).€€Furthermore,€while€felony€evading€arrest€is€generally€a€ClassÐ $ t ÐE€felony,€it€becomes€a€Class€D€felony€if€the€offenderððs€actions€create€a€ð ðrisk€of€death€or€injury€toÐ  ` Ðinnocent€bystanders€or€other€third€parties.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„16„603€(b)(3).Ð ü L  ÐÔ#†XMéXXXMéš&#ÔÔ‡XMéXXXMéÔÌà  àThe€evidence€presented€at€trial€clearly€establishes€that€the€Defendant€attempted€to€eludeÐ Ô$  Ðpolice€by€crossing€over€into€oncoming€traffic,€darting€down€a€side€street,€driving€through€a€privateÐ À  Ðdriveway€and€carport,€and€finally€through€Mr.€Edwardððs€back€yard€as€he€was€working€in€his€garden.€Ð ¬ü  ÐThe€evidence€also€shows€that€Officer€Ô_ÔAdkinsÔ_Ô€signaled€to€the€Defendant€to€bring€the€vehicle€to€a€stopÐ ˜è  Ðby€turning€on€his€lights€and€siren.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àFurthermore,€it€is€clear€that€the€Defendantððs€action€created€a€risk€of€death€or€injury€to€others.€Ð \¬ ÐThe€Defendantððs€first€attempt€to€elude€Officer€Ô_ÔAdkinsÔ_Ô€took€the€Defendant€directly€into€oncomingÐ H˜ Ðtraffic.€€After€that€attempt€failed,€the€Defendant€then€traveled€through€a€residential€area,€a€privateÐ 4„ Ðdriveway€and€carport,€and,€finally€a€backyard,€at€a€rate€of€speed€high€enough€to€uproot€a€dogwoodÐ  p Ðtree€upon€impact.€€The€Defendant€was€within€forty€feet€of€Mr.€Edwards€as€he€sped€through€hisÐ  \ Ðbackyard,€before€crashing€into€the€tree.€€Clearly,€the€Defendant€created€a€great€risk€of€injury€to€Mr.Ð øH ÐEdwards€and€other€members€of€the€neighborhood.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àThe€evidence€sufficiently€supports€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court,€and€we€affirm€theÐ ¼  ÐDefendantððs€conviction€for€felony€evasion€of€arrest.Ð ¨ø ÐÌÓ  Óò òII.€€MOTION€FOR€TRIAL€TRANSCRIPTSó óÐ €Ð ÐÓo:Óà  àThe€Defendant€also€argues€that€the€trial€court€erroneously€denied€his€request€for€trialÐ l¼ Ðtranscripts€prior€to€the€filing€of€his€motion€for€new€trial.€€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€33Ð X ¨ Ð(b)€requires€that€a€motion€for€new€trial€be€filed€ð ðwithin€thirty€days€of€the€date€the€order€of€sentenceÐ D!” Ðis€entered.ðð€€Tenn.€R.€€Crim.€P.€33(b).€€A€trial€court€has€no€jurisdiction€over€an€untimely€filed€motionÐ 0"€  Ðfor€new€trial.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Martinóó,€940€S.W.2d€567,€569€(Tenn.€1997).€€The€Defendantððs€sentencingÐ #l! Ðorder€was€entered€on€September€15,€2000,€and€the€Defendant€filed€his€motion€for€the€preparation€ofÐ $X" Ðtrial€transcripts€on€October€5,€2000,€fifteen€days€before€Rule€33€(b)ððs€thirty€day€time€limit€would€run.Ð ô$D # ÐÌà  àAt€the€hearing€on€the€motion€for€preparation€of€trial€transcripts€and€the€motion€for€new€trial,Ð Ì&"% Ðthe€trial€judge€denied€the€Defendantððs€motion,€expressing€concern€that€such€a€delay€could€result€inÐ ¸'#& Ða€late€filed€motion€for€new€trial€and€a€waiver€of€possible€issues€for€appeal.€€The€attorney€for€theÐ ¤(ô#' ÐDefendant€expressed€his€concern€that,€without€a€transcript,€he€might€overlook€a€possible€appellateÐ )à$( Ðissue.Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àInitially,€we€note€that€the€Defendantððs€trial€was€not€a€long€or€complex€one.€€Furthermore,€theÐ ° Ðattorney€preparing€the€motion€for€new€trial€was€the€Appellant's€attorney€at€trial.€€We€also€note€thatÐ œì Ðthe€Defendant€has€alleged€no€prejudice€resulting€from€the€trial€courtððs€ruling.€€Without€such€aÐ ˆØ Ðshowing€of€prejudice€and€in€light€of€the€brief€duration€and€lack€of€complexity€of€the€DefendantððsÐ tÄ Ðtrial,€we€cannot€say€the€trial€court€erred€in€overruling€the€Defendantððs€motion.Ð `° ÐÌÓ  Óò òIII.€€SENTENCINGó óÐ 8 ˆ ÐÓ¥BÓà  àFinally,€the€Defendant€challenges€the€trial€courtððs€order€that€his€aggravated€burglary€andÐ $ t Ðfelony€evasion€sentences€be€served€consecutively.€€The€Defendant€alleges€that€the€trial€court€abusedÐ  ` Ðits€discretion€in€ordering€consecutive€sentences,€and€that€his€sentences€constitute€cruel€and€unusualÐ ü L  Ðpunishment€when€considered€in€relation€to€the€crimes€committed.€€We€must€disagree.Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€this€CourtÐ À  Ðhas€a€duty€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€the€sentence€with€a€presumption€that€the€determinationsÐ ¬ü  Ðmade€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€isÐ ˜è  Ðð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÐ „Ô  Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔAshbyÔ_Ôóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð pÀ Ð1991).Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àWhen€conducting€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€a€sentence,€this€Court€must€consider:€(a)€the€evidence,Ð 4„ Ðif€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€sentencing€hearing;€(b)€the€Ô_ÔpresentenceÔ_Ô€report;€(c)€the€principles€ofÐ  p Ðsentencing€and€arguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(d)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€theÐ  \ Ðcriminal€conduct€involved;€(e)€any€statutory€mitigating€or€enhancement€factors;€(f)€any€statementÐ øH Ðmade€by€the€defendant€regarding€sentencing;€and€(g)€the€potential€or€lack€of€potential€forÐ ä4 Ðrehabilitation€or€treatment.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103,€„210Ô#†XMéXXXMé4#ÔÔ‡XMéXXXMéÔ;€òòState€v.€Breweróó,€875Ð Ð  ÐS.W.2d€298,€302€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993);€òòState€v.€Thomasóó,€755€S.W.2d€838,€844€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð ¼  ÐApp.€1988).Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àIf€our€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,€that€theÐ €Ð Ðcourt€imposed€a€lawful€sentence€after€having€given€due€consideration€and€proper€weight€to€theÐ l¼ Ðfactors€and€principles€set€out€under€the€sentencing€law,€and€that€the€trial€courtððs€findings€of€fact€areÐ X ¨ Ðadequately€supported€by€the€record,€then€we€may€not€modify€the€sentence€even€if€we€would€haveÐ D!” Ðpreferred€a€different€result.€€òòState€v.€Pikeóó,€978€S.W.2d€904,€926„27€(Tenn.€1998);€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,Ð 0"€  Ð805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð #l! ÐÌÔ#†XMéXXXMégJ#ÔÔ‡XMéXXXMéÔà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„115€states€that€the€trial€court€may€imposeÐ ô$D # Ðconsecutive€sentences€upon€a€defendant€convicted€of€multiple€criminal€offenses€if€it€finds€that€aÐ à%0!$ Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence€establishes€that€the€defendant€falls€into€one€of€seven€categories.€€First,Ð Ì&"% Ða€trial€court€may€impose€consecutive€sentences€if€the€defendant€is€a€ð ðprofessional€criminal€who€hasÐ ¸'#& Ðknowingly€devoted€such€defendantððs€life€to€criminal€acts€as€a€major€source€of€livelihood.ðð€€Tenn.Ð ¤(ô#' ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115€(b)(1).€€€A€court€may€also€impose€consecutive€sentences€if€the€defendantððsÐ )à$( Ðð ðrecord€of€criminal€activity€is€extensive.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115€(b)(2).Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àThe€record€supports€the€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences€under€both€of€these€criteria.€€TheÐ ° ÐDefendant€freely€admitted€at€the€sentencing€hearing€to€selling€drugs€in€the€past€in€order€to€supportÐ œì Ðhimself.€€Furthermore,€the€Defendantððs€record€reflects€one€conviction€for€aggravated€sexual€battery,Ð ˆØ Ðtwo€convictions€for€possession€of€cocaine€with€intent€to€sell,€and€two€theft€convictions.€€TheÐ tÄ ÐDefendantððs€employment€history€also€shows€a€pattern€of€inconsistent€employment.€€All€of€these€factsÐ `° Ðsupport€the€trial€courtððs€classification€of€the€Defendant€as€a€professional€criminal€and€one€who€hasÐ L œ Ðacquired€an€extensive€criminal€history.€€We€also€conclude€that€the€length€of€the€sentence€isÐ 8 ˆ Ðreasonably€related€to€the€seriousness€of€the€offenses€and€is€no€greater€than€the€Defendant€deserves.€Ð $ t ÐòòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Laneóó,€3€S.W.3d€456,€460€(Tenn.€1999).€€The€trial€court€did€not€err€in€orderingÐ  ` Ðconsecutive€sentences.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€also€challenges€his€sentences€on€the€ground€that€they€constitute€cruel€andÐ Ô$  Ðunusual€punishment.€€In€òòState€v.€Blackóó,€815€S.W.2d€116€(Tenn.€1991),€the€Tennessee€Supreme€CourtÐ À  Ðenumerated€three€factors€to€be€considered€in€determining€whether€a€sentence€is€cruel€and€unusual.€Ð ¬ü  ÐòòBlackóó,€815€S.W.2d€at€189.€€This€court€must€consider€(1)€whether€the€punishment€imposed€comportsÐ ˜è  Ðwith€contemporary€decency€standards;€(2)€whether€the€punishment€is€grossly€disproportionate€to€theÐ „Ô  Ðconvicted€offense;€and€(3)€whether€the€punishment€goes€beyond€what€is€necessary€to€meet€anyÐ pÀ ÐÔ_ÔpenologicalÔ_Ô€objective.€€òòBlackóó,€815€S.W.2d€at€189„90.Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àA€review€of€the€record€does€not€convince€this€court€that€a€fourteen€year€sentence€for€a€RangeÐ 4„ ÐII€offender€with€an€extensive€criminal€history€violates€contemporary€standards€of€decency€or€isÐ  p Ðgrossly€disproportionate€to€the€offenses€for€which€the€Defendant€was€convicted.€€The€DefendantÐ  \ Ðbroke€into€a€private€residence,€attempted€to€evade€police,€and€recklessly€drove€through€the€backyardsÐ øH Ðof€several€private€residences.€€Furthermore,€given€the€Defendant's€extensive€criminal€history€and€theÐ ä4 Ðfailure€of€previous€punishments€to€dissuade€him€from€his€life€of€crime,€we€cannot€say€that€theÐ Ð  Ðpunishment€goes€beyond€what€is€necessary€to€meet€Ô_ÔpenologicalÔ_Ô€objectives.€€Accordingly,€we€affirmÐ ¼  Ðthe€trial€courtððs€sentencing€determination.Ð ¨ø ÐÌÓ  Óò òCONCLUSIONó óÐ €Ð ÐÓé\Óà  àFor€the€reasons€stated€above,€we€find€that€(1)Ô#†XMéXXXMéN#ÔÔ‡XMéXXXMéÔ€the€evidence€is€sufficient€to€support€theÐ l¼ ÐDefendantððs€convictions,€(2)€the€trial€court€properly€denied€the€Defendantððs€motion€for€theÐ X ¨ Ðpreparation€of€trial€transcripts€prior€to€his€motion€for€new€trial€hearing,€and€(3)€the€trial€courtÐ D!” Ðproperly€sentenced€the€Defendant.Ô#†XMéXXXMé‡]#ÔÔ‡XMéXXXMéÔ€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€accordingly€affirmed.Ð 0"€  ÐÔ#†XMéXXXMé_#ÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð à%0!$ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGE