ÿWPC ëY½P¥ø‰ *L© \a ¿íi…Þ ÂyÇœõ´¬LÓExñÏbÐÉ·ûõêwÇÀôù'jÖñXSî*Ž¡dH ¶”jt½€·s^æ¤ö×ý ýDÀn¥X-]Ì"f©ÿÝ®?¸‚ξ”vGBVªoAú_5Û\îÈvHÎa¯ SsœY—ÒôV×"°¾ª¸ÖˆÞ®›-7;¼Ÿ ߯¸OÝLëÒC DèžXRZ­VW²iæT‘ïÂìõ ÊÆÚ9D5?Œ‹ ¥Ð$$;a™Njô=Øš'ÕëKéàI®“nMR1n!UaçkU›ùš¦üwç.m `2¶Î³ïo r~=ˆÕi_¬fŽÏñ©ËŸ„·¿/`à†¤èȺÁ”ù@æ¶~)Hø‘¾í'…*ä›…¯ ÕcHƒ7 ÜÂr JR]å…U-eÒV3õõa¯Bëf<¤WÊÌ& ”•g'¯ªh%ê€Éƒê¢l*¬ÆUËS¬Ý>Ä4Á=ƒW:+!˜ßD;Á ’ï¨÷:FÜBº“iL0?éÀ$Ä'qåfÌšQåš?!™7Ãóîc_ù©ú)íÞ #Mgb %\^ b 0ˆnU NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ 1‡‘ Æ ÆÞ Ƥ Æj 0c0N“ 1•"E* 1u, 72¡ 1Ó 72` 0w’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’b                                     0ë Büü 0¤ D3½ D-ð 0K AShÆ» 0¤ 0D% A«i»+-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular3j1,ê:i¢Ø+003|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList1I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à(¶ÙCEMU]emu}AutoList2(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1) 3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)0ÆÙCEMU]emu}AutoList3(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(Oé;$µµà0  àÔ2#ÔÚ  ÚaÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0` (#(#à- ù-(|G2¥$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ý»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô õò»»Ô d(|3ÿy$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ý»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿy$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ý»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ý»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ8€XXXdì»»d8ÑÔ‡îLî»»Ôà@ttìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEˆÐ Ö& ÐÔ#†»Ý»îîLÏ#Ôà@| | ìàAssigned€on€Briefs€€April€23,€2002ˆÐ üL ÐÌà@••ìàò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€ROBERT€ANDREW€LEWISó óˆÐ  p ÐÌà@i i ìàÔ€XXX»»ÝÔò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Knox€CountyˆÐ F – Ðà@è è ìàNo.€72846,€72847€€€€€Ray€L.€Jenkins,€JudgeˆÐ 2 ‚ ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<õ` A߈Ð öF  ÐÌà@ÕÕìàNo.€E2001„02305„CCA„R3„CDˆÐ ñA  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h à€€€€Ô_ÔAugustÔ_Ô€22,€2002Ð Ý-  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<È` AßÐ É  Ðó óÌDefendant,€Robert€Andrew€Lewis,€pled€guilty€to€two€counts€of€driving€under€the€influence€of€anÐ Ä Ðintoxicant,€first€offense,€in€the€General€Sessions€Court€of€Knox€County.€€The€trial€court€imposedÐ ° Ðconcurrent€sentences€of€confinement€for€11€months€and€29€days,€with€all€but€10€days€of€the€sentencesÐ œì Ðsuspended.€€In€addition,€the€trial€court€suspended€Defendantððs€driving€privileges€for€one€year,€andÐ ˆØ Ðordered€him€to€pay€a€fine€of€$350.00€and€attend€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€school.€€Within€one€year,€a€violation€ofÐ tÄ Ðprobation€warrant€was€issued,€alleging€that€Defendant€was€driving€on€a€revoked€license,€arrested€forÐ `° ÐÔ_ÔDUIÔ_Ô,€and€had€failed€to€complete€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€school.€€The€General€Sessions€Court€of€Knox€County€revokedÐ Lœ ÐDefendantððs€probation€and€reinstated€his€sentences€for€both€offenses.€€Defendant€appealed€to€theÐ 8ˆ ÐCriminal€Court€of€Knox€County.€€On€the€date€that€his€case€was€to€be€heard,€Defendantððs€trial€counselÐ $t Ðdid€not€appear€in€court.€€As€a€result,€the€criminal€court€dismissed€the€appeal€for€failure€to€prosecuteÐ ` Ðand€affirmed€the€judgment€of€the€Knox€County€General€Sessions€Court€revoking€DefendantððsÐ üL Ðprobation.€€After€a€review€of€the€record€and€applicable€law,€we€reverse€the€judgment€of€the€criminalÐ è8 Ðcourt€and€remand€this€case€for€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€hearing€on€the€probation€revocation€warrant.€Ð Ô$ ÐÌà@„ „ ìàò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;ˆÐ ¬ü Ðà@& & ìàJudgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Reversed€and€Remanded.ó óˆÐ ˜ è ÐÌòòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayes€óóand€òòJerryÐ p"À! ÐL.€Smithóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð \#¬" ÐÌJoe€M.€Ô_ÔFelknorÔ_Ô,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Robert€Andrew€Lewis.Ð 4%„ $ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Elizabeth€B.€Ô_ÔMarneyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð  '\"& ÐRandall€Eugene€Ô_ÔNicholsÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Zane€Ô_ÔScarlettÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ ø'H#' ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ä(4$( ÐÌÌÌÌà@66'ìàò òòòOPINIONóóˆÐ €-Ð(-ýà ÐÔ_Ô‡à@ÛÛ%ìàBackgroundó óˆÐ ° ÐÌà  àOn€June€7,€2000,€Defendant€was€convicted€of€two€separate€offenses€of€driving€under€theÐ ˆØ Ðinfluence€of€an€intoxicant,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„401,€first€offense,€in€the€General€Sessions€CourtÐ tÄ Ðof€Knox€County.€€He€was€sentenced€to€serve€concurrent€terms€of€11€months€and€29€daysÐ `° Ðconfinement,€with€all€except€10€days€suspended,€on€both€warrants€(nos.€507630€and€494354).€€InÐ L œ Ðaddition,€the€trial€court€imposed€a€fine€of€$350.00,€ordered€that€Defendant€attend€DUI€school,€andÐ 8 ˆ Ðsuspended€his€driving€privileges€for€one€year.€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àApproximately€seven€months€later,€on€January€17,€2001,€a€violation€of€probation€warrant€wasÐ ü L  Ðissued€in€the€general€sessions€court€alleging€that€Defendant€had€ð ðfailed€to€comply€with€the€conditionsÐ è 8  Ðof€his€probation€by€getting€arrested€for€DUI€and€driving€on€a€revoked€license€on€November€10,€2000Ð Ô$  Ðand€failure€to€complete€DUI€school.ðð€€On€June€14,€2001,€the€general€sessions€court€ordered€thatÐ À  ÐDefendantððs€probation€upon€his€two€DUI€convictions,€warrants€Nos.€507630€and€494354,€beÐ ¬ü  Ðrevoked.€€On€the€same€day€Defendant€filed€an€appeal€to€the€criminal€court€for€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€hearing€inÐ ˜è  Ðboth€cases.€€Upon€his€appeal€to€the€criminal€court€and€demand€for€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€hearing,€Defendant€wasÐ „Ô  Ðreleased€on€his€own€recognizance.Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àOn€July€11,€2001,€Defendant€appeared€with€counsel€in€the€Criminal€Court€of€Knox€County,Ð H˜ Ðat€which€time€he€waived€the€reading€of€the€warrants,€reserved€entry€of€his€plea,€and€requested€aÐ 4„ Ðmotion€date.€€According€to€Defendantððs€counsel,€the€motions€(which€were€not€described)€may€haveÐ  p Ðbeen€ð ðdispositiveðð€of€his€case.€€Specifically,€counsel€claimed€that€the€general€sessions€court€failedÐ  \ Ðto€comply€with€constitutional€requirements€which€must€be€fulfilled€prior€to€revoking€a€defendantððsÐ øH Ðprobation.€€Defendantððs€motion€hearing€was€scheduled€to€occur€on€August€23,€2001,€but€his€counselÐ ä4 Ðfailed€to€appear€in€criminal€court€on€that€date.€€The€record€reflects€that€the€following€colloquyÐ Ð  Ðoccurred:Ð ¼  ÐÌà8  àTHE€COURT:à0Ð Ð àHas€anyone€seen€[Defendantððs€counsel]?€Ð”äÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  à[PROSECUTOR]:à0Ð Ð àHe€came€in€during€the€recess.Ðl¼Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à(After€the€final€calling€of€the€docket,€the€further€following€proceedings€were€had€inÐ D!” Ðthis€case:)à0¸ Ð Ð àÐ0"€ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8  à[PROSECUTOR]:à0Ð Ð àYour€Honor,€as€to€the€Lewis€case,€[Defendantððs€counsel]€isÐ $X" Ðnot€here.€€This€is€an€appeal€from€Sessions€Court.€€I€wouldÐ ô$D # Ðmove€that€the€Court€confirm€[sic]€the€Sessions€Court.Ðà%0!$Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àTHE€COURT:à0Ð Ð àAll€right.€€All€right.€€Adjourn.€€Ð¸'#&Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à[PROSECUTOR]:à0Ð Ð àð!ð€this€was€the€trial€date.€Ð)à$(Ð Ð  Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àAlthough€the€record€does€not€reflect€that€Defendant€was€present€in€the€courtroom,€it€also€failsÐ ° Ðâ âto€reflect€that€he€was€òònotóó€present.€€We€surmise€that€if€Defendant€had€not€been€present€at€thisÐ œì Ðproceeding,€the€trial€court€would€have€noted€as€much,€revoked€the€order€allowing€release€upon€hisÐ ˆØ Ðown€recognizance,€and€ordered€that€a€capias€be€issued.€Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àIn€an€order€filed€August€24,€2001,€the€Criminal€Court€for€Knox€County€dismissedÐ L œ ÐDefendantððs€appeals€concerning€his€probation€revocation€for€ð ðfailure€to€prosecute,ðð€and€affirmed€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðjudgment€of€the€Knox€County€General€Sessions€Court€(revoking€Defendantððs€probation).€€On€appealÐ $ t Ðto€this€Court,€both€cases€have€been€consolidated€for€our€consideration€and€the€following€issues€areÐ  ` Ðpresented:€(1)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€by€dismissing€Defendantððs€appeal€for€ð ðfailure€toÐ ü L  Ðprosecuteðð€and€by€affirming€the€general€session€court€judgment€revoking€Defendantððs€probation€onÐ è 8  Ðthe€ground€that€his€counsel€failed€to€appear€in€court;€and€(2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€byÐ Ô$  Ðaffirming€the€judgment€revoking€Defendantððs€probation€whereas€his€placement€on€probation€was€notÐ À  Ðvalid€in€the€first€place.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà@‚‚&ìàò òAnalysisó óˆÐ „Ô  ÐÌà  àFirst,€we€address€Defendantððs€contention€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€dismissing€his€òòdeóó€òònovoóóÐ \¬ Ðappeal€for€ð ðfailure€to€prosecuteðð€and€by€affirming€the€general€sessions€courtððs€revocation€of€hisÐ H˜ Ðprobation€on€the€ground€that€his€counsel€failed€to€appear€in€court.€Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„311€provides€that€Ð  \ Ðà  àÌà8  àà ` àWhenever€any€person€is€arrested€for€the€violation€of€probation€and€suspensionÐ ä4 Ðof€sentence,€the€trial€judge€granting€such€probation€and€suspension€of€sentence,€theÐ Ð  Ðtrial€judgeððs€successor,€or€any€judge€of€equal€jurisdiction€who€is€requested€by€suchÐ ¼  Ðgranting€trial€judge€to€do€so€shall,€at€the€earliest€practicable€time,€inquire€into€theÐ ¨ø Ðcharges€and€determine€whether€or€not€a€violation€has€occurred,€and€at€such€inquiry,Ð ”ä Ðòòthe€defendant€must€be€present€and€is€entitled€to€be€represented€by€counsel€and€hasÐ €Ð Ðthe€right€to€introduce€testimony€in€the€defendantððs€behalfóó.Ðl¼Ð Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(b)€(1997€&€Supp.€2001)€(emphasis€added).Ð D!” ÐÌà  à€If€the€trial€judge€finds€that€the€defendant€violated€the€conditions€of€his€probation€by€aÐ #l! Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence€and,€as€a€result,€causes€the€defendant€to€commence€execution€of€theÐ $X" Ðjudgment€as€originally€entered,€the€defendant€has€the€right€to€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€40„35„Ð ô$D # Ð311(e)€(Supp.€2001).€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€subsection€27„5„108(a)€provides€that€any€partyÐ à%0!$ Ðmay€appeal€from€an€adverse€decision€of€the€general€sessions€court€to€the€circuit€court€of€that€countyÐ Ì&"% Ðwithin€ten€(10)€days.€€Subsection€(c)€states€that€such€appeal€ð ðshall€be€heard€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€in€the€circuitÐ ¸'#& Ðcourt.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€27„5„108(c)€(2000).€€Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà  àIn€òòState€v.€Cunninghamóó,€972€S.W.2d€16€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998),€the€defendantððs€probationÐ |*Ì%) Ðwas€revoked€by€the€Municipal€Court€of€Jackson,€Tennessee.€€The€defendant€appealed€the€revocationÐ h+¸&* Ðto€the€Circuit€Court€of€Madison€County,€and€the€circuit€court€affirmed€the€municipal€courtððsÐ ° Ðjudgment€without€conducting€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€hearing.€€A€panel€of€this€Court€reversed€and€remanded€theÐ œì Ðcase€to€the€circuit€court€for€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€probation€revocation€hearing.€€In€doing€so,€our€Court€statedÐ ˆØ Ðthat€ð ð[i]n€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review,€ððthe€parties€are€entitled€to€a€reexamination€of€the€whole€matter€of€lawÐ tÄ Ðand€fact.ðð€€òòId.óó€at€18€(quoting€òòRichards€v.€Tayloróó,€926€S.W.2d€569,€570€(Tenn.€App.€1996)).€€TheÐ `° Ðreviewing€court€is€not€concerned€with€what€took€place€in€the€lower€court;€instead,€ð ðthe€matter€is€triedÐ L œ Ðas€if€no€other€hearing€had€occurred.ðð€€òòId.óó€(citing€òòHohenberg€Bros.€Co.€v.€Missouri€Pac.€R.R.€Co.óó,€586Ð 8 ˆ ÐS.W.2d€117,€119€(Tenn.€App.€1979)).€òòóó€In€other€words,€ð ð[a]€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€hearing€encompasses€more€thanÐ $ t Ðjust€the€presentation€of€proof.€€The€court€must€try€the€matter€as€if€no€judgment€had€previously€beenÐ  ` Ðrendered.ðð€€òòId.ó󀀀Рü L  ÐÌà  àIn€òòState€v.€Winebargeróó,€70€S.W.3d€99€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2001),€our€Court€found€that€the€trialÐ Ô$  Ðcourt€erred€in€dismissing€the€defendantððs€appeal€of€the€general€sessions€court€sentence€for€ð ðfailureÐ À  Ðto€prosecuteðð€where€the€defendant€arrived€at€court€approximately€one€hour€late.€€Relying€onÐ ¬ü  ÐòòCunninghamóó,€we€reversed€and€remanded€the€matter€to€the€trial€court€for€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€hearing€upon€aÐ ˜è  Ðfinding€that€ð ðan€appeal€by€a€defendant€in€a€criminal€case€from€general€sessions€court€is€of€suchÐ „Ô  Ðsignificance€that€it€should€not€be€dismissed€merely€because€a€defendant€is€one€hour€late€for€court.ðð€Ð pÀ ÐòòId.óó€at€102.Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àUnder€òòCunninghamóó,€Defendant€is€entitled€to€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€reexamination€of€the€whole€matterÐ 4„ Ðof€law€and€fact.€€In€the€case€òòsubóó€òòjudiceóó,€Defendantððs€trial€counsel€failed€to€appear€in€court,€but€theÐ  p Ðrecord€does€not€indicate€that€Defendant€was€not€present.€€Further,€the€record€does€not€suggest€thatÐ  \ ÐDefendant€was€in€any€way€responsible€for€his€counselððs€absence.€€Statutory€law€provides€that€aÐ øH Ðdefendant€who€is€charged€with€a€probation€violation€is€entitled€to€be:€(1)€present€at€the€probationÐ ä4 Ðrevocation€hearing,€(2)€represented€by€counsel,€and€(3)€allowed€to€present€testimony€on€his€behalf.€Ð Ð  ÐòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(b)€(1997€&€Supp.€2001).€€Consequently,€we€conclude€that€theÐ ¼  Ðcriminal€courtððs€dismissal€for€ð ðfailure€to€prosecuteðð€and€subsequent€affirmation€of€the€generalÐ ¨ø Ðsessions€courtððs€revocation€of€Defendantððs€probation€was€not€proper€under€the€circumstancesÐ ”ä Ðpresented€here.€€Since€we€find€it€was€error€for€the€trial€court€to€dismiss€the€appeal€from€generalÐ €Ð Ðsessions€court€on€the€ground€that€Appellantððs€counsel€was€not€present€in€the€courtroom€when€theÐ l¼ Ðcase€was€called,€this€case€is€remanded€for€a€for€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€hearing€in€the€criminal€court€concerningÐ X ¨ Ðthe€probation€revocation€in€each€case.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àDefendant€also€claims€that€a€probation€violation€cannot€be€found€because€the€judgments€failÐ #l! Ðto€contain€an€express€provision€placing€him€on€probation€in€the€first€place.€€He€contends€that€it€isÐ $X" Ðunconstitutional€to€ð ðread€intoðð€the€judgments€that€which€is€not€expressly€stated€therein.€€DefendantÐ ô$D # Ðclaims€that,€since€he€was€not€on€probation,€he€was€not€subject€to€revocation€thereof€and€the€trial€courtÐ à%0!$ Ðshould€have€dismissed€the€violation€of€probation€warrants€against€him.Ð Ì&"% ÐÌà  àAlthough€Defendantððs€counsel€claimed€at€the€proceeding€in€criminal€court€on€July€11,€2001Ð ¤(ô#' Ðthat€motions€would€be,€or€had€been,€filed€which€may€be€ð ðdispositiveðð€of€the€case,€the€appellateÐ )à$( Ðrecord€contains€no€such€€motion(s).€€The€record€further€reveals€that€no€motions€were€ever€presentedÐ |*Ì%) Ðto€the€trial€court.€€Generally,€an€appellate€court€may€review€only€those€issues€which€were€previouslyÐ h+¸&* Ðpresented€for€determination€in€the€lower€court.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a);€òòFahrner€v.€S.W.€Mfg.,Ð ° ÐInc.óó,€48€S.W.3d€141,€148€(Tenn.€2001);€òòNorton€v.€McCaskillóó,€12€S.W.3d€789,€795€(Tenn.€2000);Ð œì ÐòòLawrence€v.€Stanfordóó,€655€S.W.2d€927,€929€(Tenn.€1983)€(ð ðIt€has€long€been€the€general€rule€thatÐ ˆØ Ðquestions€not€raised€in€the€trial€court€will€not€be€entertained€on€appeal€.€.€.€.ðð).€€Therefore,€this€issueÐ tÄ Ðis€not€properly€before€us.Ð `° ÐÌà@  %ìàò òConclusionó óˆÐ 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àFor€the€reasons€stated€in€this€opinion,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€reversed,€and€this€caseÐ  ` Ðis€remanded€for€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€hearing€in€the€criminal€court€concerning€the€probation€revocation€in€eachÐ ü L  Ðcase.€€The€trial€court€should€also€allow€Defendant€to€present€any€motions€which€have€been€timelyÐ è 8  Ðfiled€by€Defendant€concerning€the€revocation€of€probation.Ð Ô$  ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð „Ô  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÐ pÀ Ð