ÿWPCº ò[òC!O¸À#—*á ‡T.9'Ó#[È^š…h¹À¯´ÇâRôÿ¡]”R? ú)AoFq«}TÁMÜþCgQ"Nó)ÿ§§Yþƒê¤Y¾î\=൫@oœ.§ÔMrqÓØ혙¶®TOôÕqK\†»09ø`Áw FtÙq¸¬Ý›+š–Ëu×'7N¨µ²©$eõ¾ÄJæY¿ 16Ãuç‡öзbhkú!¥ù¬w¨S†×Áñ½Ö½¸Ì”l½±B¥¯zq3>I‰¦¼aL¯‹)'„ôÛ"n_ òˆQ Š¡Øè$pÉò4-… S<Ùm!,¤£74ÙîD×›¢9.ÆŸCu™o_!V1H䜑ìòE&ážüôu$æ@Ü "@\o*ï‘"[2:³5ÄÓªÙo¿Q"úÆJØ–ðR=A*ä$¯|Œ$1óiµ½QÈíy’Å·(ýULÄò ¥³NÄ|—ŽuÁsÃôóìç‡ï™aáâ‚o„W+qÉ–»â‘ (ç7tè#óÒzþ©,£Ÿt¢zé˜6*~“¥]ÓcV†¥j¸ü£^Ã>#mm¶¼ëlt$>½ßψÆ÷Bêœ?àDpq6ô;êV 0b %\^ b 0ˆnU!NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ U@Ð UN Æ^ Æ$ Æê ư #Áv N79(AEi 0Dkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkb¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ 0ë···· B¢¢ 0¤¿ D3c D-– 0KÃà ASÆa 0¤' 0DË A«»v«Š-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularüPH,ê:i¢Ø+003|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman (ÈhH  Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0 (#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-(|G2>‹$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€€»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôŒ%ò»»Ô d(|3p$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€€»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3p$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€€»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€€»»d dÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼€»»»ÔÑ8€ÜBXXdæ»»d 8ÑÑ  Ñà@hhìàÔ‡î’€ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@gg$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼€»îî’ #ÔˆÐ Ï ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€November€20,€2002Ð î> ÐÔ‡XÜBX»¼€ÔÌò òÔ#†¼€»XXÜB #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€òòóóv.€CLARK€DOUGLAS€LIVELYÔ‡XÜBX»¼€Ôó óÐ à0 ÐÌò òDirect€ó óà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Cheatham€CountyÐ Ò " Ðà@@øøìàNo.€13745€€€€€€Allen€W.€Wallace,€JudgeÐ ¸  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<i` AßÐ jº  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2002„00666„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€December€6,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ _¯  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<*` AßÐ +{  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant€pled€guilty€to€attempted€second€degree€murder,€and€the€trial€court€imposed€a€ten„yearÐ  p  Ðsentence.€€He€appeals€his€sentence,€arguing€he€should€have€received€the€minimum€sentence€of€eightÐ V Ðyears€with€alternative€sentencing.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€Ð ì< ÐÓ¬ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ ¸ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼€»àXÜB€#ÔÔ‡XÜBX.¼€ÔJoe€G.€Riley,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.Wellesóó€and€òòAlan€E.€Glenn,Ð „Ô ÐJJ.óó,€joined.Ð jº ÐÌMichael€J.€Flanagan,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Clark€Douglas€Lively.€Ð 6† ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Jennifer€L.€Bledsoe,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð R ÐDan€M.€Alsobrooks,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Robert€S.€Wilson,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ è8 ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð Î ÐÓˆÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼€»XXÜB·#ÔÔ‡XÜBX»¼€ÔÐ šê ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼€»XXÜBS #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XÜBX»¼€Ôà0  àOn€January€19,€2001,€the€defendant€stabbed€his€live„in€girlfriend€twice€in€the€stomach€beforeÐf!¶!(#(# Ðstabbing€himself.€€He€was€indicted€for€attempted€first€degree€murder€and€pled€guilty€to€the€reducedÐ L"œ" Ðcharge€of€attempted€second€degree€murder.€€Following€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€imposedÐ 2#‚# Ða€ten„year€sentence€to€be€served€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€On€appeal,€the€defendant€assertsÐ $h$ Ðhis€sentence€is€excessive,€and€he€should€have€received€the€minimum€sentence€of€eight€years€withÐ þ$N % Ðalternative€sentencing.€Ð ä%4!& ÐÌò òà@óóìàI.€€STANDARD€OF€REVIEWó óˆÐ °'#( ÐÌà  àÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔThis€courtððs€review€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€òòde€novoóó€with€a€presumptionÐ |)Ì$* Ðof€correctness.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€conditioned€upon€anÐ b*²%+ Ðaffirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€judge€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€allÐ H+˜&, Ðrelevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€òòState€v.€Pettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€540,€543€(Tenn.€1999).€€If€the€trialÐ .,~'- Ðcourt€fails€to€comply€with€the€statutory€directives,€there€is€no€presumption€of€correctness€and€ourÐ -d(. Ðreview€is€òòde€novoóó.€€òòState€v.€Pooleóó,€945€S.W.2d€93,€96€(Tenn.€1997).Ð ú-J)/ý Їà  àThe€burden€is€upon€the€appealing€party€to€show€that€the€sentence€is€improper.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ ° ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„401(d),€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.€€In€conducting€our€review,€we€areÐ –æ Ðrequired,€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„210,€to€consider€the€followingÐ |Ì Ðfactors€in€sentencing:Ð b² ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(1)€[t]he€evidence,€if€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€the€sentencingÐ . ~ Ðhearing;€(2)€[t]he€presentence€report;€(3)€[t]he€principles€ofÐ  d Ðsentencing€and€arguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(4)€[t]heÐ ú J Ðnature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminal€conduct€involved;€(5)Ð à 0 Ð[e]vidence€and€information€offered€by€the€parties€on€the€enhancementÐ Æ   Ðand€mitigating€factors€in€ðððð€40„35„113€and€40„35„114;€and€(6)€[a]nyÐ ¬ ü  Ðstatement€the€defendant€wishes€to€make€in€the€defendantððs€ownÐ ’â  Ðbehalf€about€sentencing.€€ÐxÈ ` x` x ÐÌà  àThe€range€of€punishment€for€attempted€second€degree€murder,€a€Class€B€felony,€is€from€eightÐ D”  Ðto€twelve€years€for€a€Range€I€standard€offender.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(2).€€If€noÐ *z  Ðmitigating€or€enhancement€factors€for€sentencing€are€present,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€sectionÐ ` Ð40„35„210(c)€provides€that€the€presumptive€sentence€for€a€Class€B€felony€shall€be€the€minimumÐ öF Ðsentence€within€the€applicable€range.€€òòóóòòState€v.€Lavenderóó,€967€S.W.2d€803,€806€(Tenn.€1998);€òòStateÐ Ü, Ðv.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€788€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€However,€if€such€factors€do€exist,€a€trialÐ Â Ðcourt€should€enhance€the€minimum€sentence€within€the€range€for€enhancement€factors€and€thenÐ ¨ø Ðreduce€the€sentence€within€the€range€for€the€mitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(e);Ð ŽÞ ÐòòState€v.€Arnettóó,€49€S.W.3d€250,€257€(Tenn.€2001).€€No€particular€weight€for€each€factor€is€prescribedÐ tÄ Ðby€the€statute,€as€the€weight€given€to€each€factor€is€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court€as€long€asÐ Zª Ðthe€trial€court€complies€with€the€purposes€and€principles€of€the€sentencing€act€and€its€findings€areÐ @ Ðsupported€by€the€record.€€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€238€(Tenn.€1986);€òòState€v.€Kelleyóó,€34Ð &v ÐS.W.3d€471,€479€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2000);€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210,€SentencingÐ  \ ÐCommission€Comments.€Ð òB ÐÌòòòòóóóóÓ*°,XXa&Ø'‹X°œX*Óà@ìàò òII.€€GUILTY€PLEA€TRANSCRIPTó óˆÐ ¾ ÐÌà  àÔ#†XÜBXX XÜB¾ #ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔThe€record€before€this€court€does€not€contain€a€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea.€€In€order€toÐ Š Ú Ðconduct€an€effective€appellate€review€of€sentencing,€a€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing€isÐ p!À  Ðnecessary.€€òòState€v.€Keenóó,€996€S.W.2d€842,€844€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999).€€The€transcript€of€theÐ V"¦! Ðguilty€plea€is€usually€necessary€in€order€for€this€court€to€ascertain€the€facts€and€circumstancesÐ <#Œ" Ðsurrounding€the€offense.€€Indeed,€the€guilty€plea€hearing€is€the€equivalent€of€a€trial.€€òòIdóó.€at€843.€€InÐ "$r# Ðthe€absence€of€a€transcript€of€a€guilty€plea,€this€court€must€generally€conclude€that€the€sentenceÐ %X $ Ðimposed€by€the€trial€court€was€correct.€€òòIdóó.€at€844.Ô#†XÜBXX XÜBâ#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔ€€In€any€event,€the€record€before€this€court€supports€Ð î%>!% Ðthe€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court.Ð Ô&$"& ÐÌÌà@~~ìàò òIII.€€PROOF€AT€SENTENCINGˆÐ †)Ö$) ÐÌà  àó óAt€sentencing,€the€victim€testified€that€on€the€day€of€the€offense€she€advised€the€defendantÐ R+¢&+ Ðby€telephone€he€needed€to€move€out€of€her€house.€€She€stated€it€was€apparent€the€defendant€had€beenÐ 8,ˆ', Ðdrinking.€€She€said€she€agreed€to€give€him€a€ride€and€told€him€to€be€ready€to€leave€her€home€inÐ ° Ðfifteen€or€twenty€minutes.€€The€victim€testified€that€when€she€arrived€at€her€home,€accompanied€byÐ –æ Ðher€teenage€son€and€his€girlfriend,€the€defendant€was€seated€at€the€kitchen€table€with€a€knife€in€hisÐ |Ì Ðboot.€€According€to€the€victim,€the€defendant€said€they€needed€to€talk;€when€she€replied€they€couldÐ b² Ðtalk€later,€the€defendant€pushed€her€against€the€kitchen€cabinet€and€stabbed€her€twice€in€the€stomach.€Ð H˜ ÐThe€victim€stated€the€defendant€then€grabbed€her€by€the€hair€and€threw€her€into€the€kitchen€table,Ð . ~ Ðinto€the€wall,€and€onto€the€floor.€€She€said€the€defendant€then€left€the€room.€€€Ð  d ÐÌà  àThe€victim€testified€she€attempted€to€flee,€but€when€the€defendant€returned€to€the€room,€heÐ à 0 Ðgrabbed€her€and€threw€her€into€a€chair.€€She€stated€he€then€sat€down€facing€her€and€began€to€berateÐ Æ   Ðher€while€pointing€the€knife.€€She€said€she€told€the€defendant€she€was€in€pain€and€needed€medicalÐ ¬ ü  Ðattention,€but€he€replied€she€was€not€going€to€die.€€According€to€the€victim,€the€defendant€then€statedÐ ’â  Ðhe€was€going€to€die;€he€then€stabbed€himself€in€the€chest.€€Ð xÈ  ÐÌà  àThe€victim€was€hospitalized€for€six€days€and€incurred€over€$40,000€in€medical€expenses€asÐ D”  Ða€result€of€her€injuries.€€The€presentence€report€indicated€she€continued€to€have€medical€problemsÐ *z  Ðdue€to€her€injuries€and€also€suffered€emotional€problems€as€a€result€of€the€attack.€€At€the€hearing,Ð ` Ðthe€victim€said€the€defendant€violated€the€conditions€of€his€bond€and€an€order€of€protection€byÐ öF Ðreturning€to€her€home€following€the€offense.€€According€to€the€presentence€report,€the€victim€statedÐ Ü, Ðthat€prior€to€the€offense,€the€defendant€had€assaulted€her€once,€had€become€more€controlling,€andÐ Â Ðoften€drank€heavily.€€€€Ô#†XÜBXX XÜB+#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔ€€Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€testified€he€did€not€remember€the€stabbing.€€In€his€statement€contained€in€theÐ tÄ Ðpresentence€report,€the€defendant€reported€he€had€been€drinking€prior€to€the€offense,€but€deniedÐ Zª Ðbeing€drunk.€€According€to€the€presentence€report,€the€defendant€attributed€the€incident€to€depressionÐ @ Ðand€to€the€victim's€ð ðdemandingðð€behavior.€€The€defendant€admitted€he€violated€his€bond€conditionsÐ &v Ðand€an€order€of€protection€by€going€to€the€victimððs€home;€he€explained€he€understood€the€order€ofÐ  \ Ðprotection,€but€did€not€understand€the€ð ðseriousness€this€was.ðð€€Ô#†XÜBXX XÜBˆ(#ÔThe€proof€established€the€defendantððsÐ òB Ðonly€other€criminal€conviction€was€for€violating€the€order€of€protection.Ð Ø( ÐÌà@ ìàò òIV.€€ENHANCEMENT€AND€MITIGATING€FACTORSó óˆÐ ¤ô ÐÌò òA.€Enhancement€Factorsó óÐ p!À  ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€found€three€enhancement€factors€applied:€factor€(5),€the€defendant€treated€theÐ <#Œ" Ðvictim€with€exceptional€cruelty;€factor€(6),€the€personal€injuries€inflicted€upon€the€victim€wereÐ "$r# Ðparticularly€great;€and€factor€(8),€the€defendant€had€a€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€complyÐ %X $ Ðwith€the€conditions€of€a€sentence€involving€release€in€the€community.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„Ð î%>!% Ð35„114(5),€(6),€(8)€(1997).€€The€trial€court€stated€it€did€not€give€much€weight€to€factor€(8).€€The€trialÐ Ô&$"& Ðcourt€further€found€that€enhancement€factor€(9),€the€defendant€possessed€a€deadly€weapon,€did€notÐ º' #' Ðapply€because€ð ðthat€is€part€of€assault€with€intent€to€commit€second€degree€murder.ðð€€òòSee€óóTenn.€CodeÐ  (ð#( ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„114(9).€€Ð †)Ö$) ÐÌà  àWhile€the€defendant€does€not€contend€the€trial€court€improperly€applied€any€enhancementÐ R+¢&+ Ðfactors,€we€must€conclude€the€trial€court€erred€in€its€application€of€enhancement€factor€(8),€theÐ 8,ˆ', Ðdefendant€had€a€ð ðprevious€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€a€òòsentenceóóÐ ° Ðinvolving€release€in€the€community.ðð€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(8)€(1997)€(emphasisÐ –æ Ðadded).€€The€record€shows€the€trial€court€applied€this€factor€because€the€defendant€violated€theÐ |Ì Ðconditions€of€his€bond€by€returning€to€the€victimððs€home.€€Bail€is€not€a€òòsentenceóó;€therefore,€thisÐ b² Ðenhancement€factor€was€not€applicable.€€Due€to€this€error,€we€will€conduct€a€òòde€novo€óóreview€of€theÐ H˜ Ðdefendantððs€sentence€without€a€presumption€that€the€trial€courtððs€determinations€are€correct.€€òòPooleóó,Ð . ~ Ð945€S.W.2d€at€96.€Ð  d ÐÌà  àÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔBased€on€the€evidence€appearing€in€the€record,€we€conclude€the€trial€court€properly€appliedÐ à 0 Ðenhancement€factors€(5)€and€(6).€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(5),€(6)€(1997).€€Further,€Ô#†XÜBXX XÜBP4#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔthe€trialÐ Æ   Ðcourt€was€mistaken€in€concluding€enhancement€factor€(9)€could€not€be€applied€to€a€sentence€forÐ ¬ ü  Ðattempted€second€degree€murder.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(9)€(1997).€€The€use€of€a€deadlyÐ ’â  Ðweapon€is€not€an€essential€element€of€attempted€second€degree€murder,€and€it€may€be€consideredÐ xÈ  Ðas€an€enhancement€factor.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Baxteróó,€938€S.W.2d€697,€705€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€WeÐ ^®  Ðfind€this€factor€to€be€applicable€in€the€instant€case.€€Ð D”  ÐÌÔ#†XÜBXX XÜBg5#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔò òB.€€Mitigating€Factorsó óÐ ` ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€applied€mitigating€factors€(2),€the€defendant€acted€under€strong€provocation,Ð Ü, Ðand€(8),€the€defendant€was€suffering€from€a€mental€or€physical€condition€that€significantly€reducedÐ Â Ðhis€culpability.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(2),€(8)€(1997).€€Although€we€question€theÐ ¨ø Ðapplicability€of€mitigating€factor€(2),€we€need€not€address€its€applicability€to€reach€a€properÐ ŽÞ Ðdisposition€of€this€case.€€€Ð tÄ ÐÌò òC.€€Summary€ó óÐ @ ÐÌà  àÔ#†XÜBXX XÜBú7#ÔWe€have€determined€the€trial€court€erred€in€applying€enhancement€factor€(8).€€However,€tÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔheÐ  \ Ðwrongful€application€of€one€or€more€enhancement€factors€by€the€trial€court€does€not€necessarily€leadÐ òB Ðto€a€reduction€in€the€length€of€the€sentence.€€òòState€v.€Winfieldóó,€23€S.W.3d€279,€284€(Tenn.€2000).€Ð Ø( ÐThis€determination€requires€that€we€review€the€evidence€supporting€any€remaining€enhancementÐ ¾ Ðfactors,€as€well€as€the€evidence€supporting€any€mitigating€factors.€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔImfeldÔ_Ôóó,€70€S.W.3d€698,Ð ¤ô Ð707€(Tenn.€2002).€€We€also€found€enhancement€factor€(9)€was€applicable,€although€not€applied€byÐ Š Ú Ðthe€trial€court.€€We€conclude€the€mid„range€sentence€of€ten€years€was€appropriate.Ô#†XÜBXX XÜB;#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔ€€Ð p!À  ÐÔ#†XÜBXX XÜB5>#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔÌÌÌÌà@ê ê ìàò òV.€ALTERNATIVE€SENTENCINGó óˆÐ î%>!% ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€further€argues€he€is€entitled€to€alternative€sentencing€in€the€form€of€splitÐ º' #' Ðconfinement.€€This€argument€is€without€merit.Ð  (ð#( ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€is€not€eligible€for€probation€because€he€has€received€a€sentence€of€greater€thanÐ l*¼%* Ðeight€years.€€Ô#†XÜBXX XÜBŽ>#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔòòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(a)Ô#†XÜBXX XÜBg@#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔ.€€Further,€he€is€not€eligible€for€the€communityÐ R+¢&+ Ðcorrections€program.€€First,€he€was€convicted€of€a€crime€against€the€person€using€a€weapon.€€òòSeeÐ 8,ˆ', ÐóóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(a)(2),€(4).€€Second,€because€he€is€not€eligible€for€probation,€he€cannotÐ ° Ðbe€considered€as€a€candidate€for€community€corrections€under€the€special€needs€provision€ofÐ –æ ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€subsection€40„36„106(c).€€òòÔ#†XÜBXX XÜBÔ@#ÔÔ‡ XÜBXXXÜBÔState€v.€Grigsbyóó,€957€S.W.2d€541,€546€(Tenn.Ð |Ì ÐCrim.€App.€1997)òòóó;€òòState€v.€Statenóó,€787€S.W.2d€934,€936€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1989).€€There€are€noÐ b² Ðsentencing€alternatives€available€to€the€defendant.€€Ô#†XÜBXX XÜBøB#ÔÐ H˜ ÐÌà@GG%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ  d ÐÌà  àWe€conclude€the€trial€court€misapplied€enhancement€factor€(8)€to€the€defendantððs€sentence,Ð à 0 Ðbut€erred€in€not€applying€enhancement€factor€(9).€€After€conducting€a€òòde€novoóó€review,€we€concludeÐ Æ   Ðthe€ten„year€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€was€proper.€€Therefore,€we€affirm€the€judgment€ofÐ ¬ ü  Ðthe€trial€court.Ð ’â  ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ *z  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGE