ÿWPCî –q[®;e½{åaH±gcÿ໪ú(WBÜL‰dî…„˜­bÈîuÉÊ‚èïO ³‚NÚÊ¢ä’3‹÷~"YJ”®rÚ’wA]m]AÔ:Nx7…®4HR*;X:Õõ–Š)ÓvB®ÃHw…NQ_Jfaʇëg‘·á¥…Ÿ!Ò‚óþw¿`ÅæWè…Âä©Í}v9ò% žúl™8wn¥qàÔÁÒÛ¢ýXf†¾Iª¼Í;:ϱ–ÔCFd~…£Q}ÞͼµY³OlŸ ß öSäOc4ò¨èúmÑÒ€jKt¡oY?î%W@™Yé%TX<º®–ÇM…¥Ò…s¾’ˆl æHĽ<¶ê²Šû3‚˜Ûp!â?è칄|ÍÐôCVYYTÌõ=%Ž9"çäh:£ø³JB"ê÷=B[*ë!5!$YbîZ<.äÂõ1…–$ŠJum±–IlC„ÛÞ$mчEUÆ btÿ²‘AïÉÍÿWòë†h½Ì‡Z¹¤”­$íB!_p@=<þXÑÀ¦6 #ÊžF•ñö–Øþà(Äl%ªäv ÷˜Cª,öû‹e‚ÎÆë~±zz4dδv0~íª²Ê­G:y8ÞÁ+]¸Ó.I×Å…# F U:Q %‹ 0(‘ U:¹ w@ó 43 G V 0”^ (ò 0D^U:{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ Bµµµµµµµµ D3ÒÒÒ 0D AOIƘ˜ 0D^ D/¢ BјHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLÐ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡, øð AZ"Arial Regular ¶{·¸/e¹DºD»¼½D¾¿Ó€ýhµ&3|xÊ(D(2´¤$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ý ƒ ´¤$ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€òòBlankenship€v.€Stateóó,€858€S.W.2d€897,€906€(Tenn.€1993),€the€Supreme€CourtÐ ° Ðreaffirmed€òòNealóó,€ð ð[b]ut€we€also€indicated€that€ððabsolutely€literal€compliance€with€the€adviceÐ ˜è Ðto€be€given€is€not€required,ðð€so€long€as€the€ððsense€of€the€substance€of€the€required€adviceÏ.€.€.€is€[expressed€to€an€accused€prior€to€his€guilty€plea]ðððð€(quoting€òòNealóó,€810€S.W.2d€at€137).(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ô€XJ XXXÔÔ€î߆îXXJ ÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€a›îî߆ÔÐ  ÐÌò òJune€4,€1999Ð ¶¶ ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôy£ ôa›ÔAppellate€CourtÐ –– ÐClerkó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d""""'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ñ›ñ¸ñÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€XLBXXXÔÓ  Óñ¿ñœßr€ *<,(j 8 `€€@Eh± tt0" °¨Órß›ñ¿ñIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ ° ÐÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌFEBRUARY€1999€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓGARY€WAYNE€LOWE,à h àà À à)Ð  p  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àC.C.A.€No.€03C01„9806„CR„00222Ð `  Ðà ` àAppellant,à  àà h àà À à)Ð P  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àAnderson€CountyÐ ð@  Ðv.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àà p àÐ à0  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àHonorable€James€B.€Scott,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ Ð  ÐSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À à)Ð À Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à(Post„Conviction€Relief)Ð ° Ðà ` àAppellee.€€à  àà h àà À à)Ð  ð ÐÌÌÌÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à h àà À àà  àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:Ð @ ÐÌDouglas€A.€Trantà  àà h àà À àà  àJohn€Knox€WalkupÐ  p Ð900€South€Gay€Streetà h àà À àà  àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ ` ÐSuite€1502à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÐ P ÐKnoxville,€TN€€37902à h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ð ð@ ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àErik€W.€DaabÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJames€N.€RamseyÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à127€Anderson€County€CourthouseÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àClinton,€TN€€37716ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJanice€G.€HicksÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à127€Anderson€County€CourthouseÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àClinton,€TN€€37716ÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€______________________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌL.€T.€LAFFERTY,€SENIOR€JUDGEÌÌÐ   :p59 Ðò òòòÔ‡¼rä¼XXLBÔÓ  ÓÑ7€J XXdæXXdæ7ÑO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óóóÔ#†XLBX¼¼rä+ #ÔÐ ° ÐÓJ ÓÌÌÓÓà ` àThe€appellant,€Gary€Wayne€Lowe,€referred€herein€as€ð ðthe€petitioner,ðð€appeals€as€ofÏright€from€the€trial€courtððs€dismissal€of€his€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€On€July€17,Ï1979,€the€petitioner€pled€guilty€to€grand€larceny€before€the€Anderson€County€CriminalÏCourt.€€Pursuant€to€the€plea€agreement,€the€trial€court€imposed€a€three„year€sentence€inÏthe€Department€of€Correction€to€run€concurrently€with€a€pending€sentence.€€In€June,€1988,Ïthe€petitioner€filed€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief,€alleging€his€1979€guilty€plea€wasÏinvalid,€because€he€was€not€advised€of€his€right€against€compulsory€self„incrimination;€norÏwas€he€warned€that€the€conviction€could€be€used€against€him€to€enhance€a€futureÏsentence.€€Following€an€evidentiary€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€relief.ÌÌà ` àAfter€a€thorough€review€of€the€entire€record,€briefs€of€the€parties,€and€appropriateÏlaw,€we€AFFIRM€the€trial€courtððs€judgment.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓPROCEDURAL€BACKGROUNDó óÐ  V ÐÌÓ  Óà ` àThe€petitioner€is€presently€serving€a€life€sentence€in€the€Department€of€CorrectionÏas€an€habitual€criminal€resulting€from€his€conviction€for€automobile€burglary.€This€CourtÏaffirmed€the€petitionerððs€conviction,€òòState€v.€Gary€Wayne€Loweóó,€No.€100€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð †'Ö"% ÐKnoxville,€December€18,€1981),€òòper.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1982).€€The€petitioner€filed€aÐ f)¶$' Ðpetition€for€post„conviction€relief€challenging€his€burglary€conviction€and€habitual€criminalÏñ¸ñœñ¸ñsentence,ñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñ€which,€upon€denial€by€the€trial€court,€was€affirmed€by€this€Court.€€òòGary€WayneÐ &-v(+ ÐLowe€v.€Stateóó,€No.€139,€1985€LEXIS€3081€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€April€10,€1985).€Ð /V*- ÐOn€August€26,€1987,€the€petitioner€filed€a€second€post„conviction€petition€alleging€that€anÏunconstitutional€jury€instruction€was€given€during€the€habitual€criminal€phase€of€his€trial.€ÏHe€also€alleged€that€his€habitual€criminal€sentence€was€invalid,€because€his€prior€grandÏlarceny€conviction€was€void,€due€to€the€fact€that€it€was€an€unconstitutional€plea.€€TheÏpetitioner€alleged€in€his€guilty€plea€proceedings€that€he€was€not€advised€of€his€right€againstÏself„incrimination€and€was€not€warned€that€the€conviction€could€be€used€to€enhance€hisÐ F:–59 Ðpunishment€for€a€future€crime.€€This€Court€reversed€the€dismissal€and€remanded€for€anÏevidentiary€hearing.€€òòState€v.€Gary€Wayne€Loweóó,€No.€192,€1989€WL€34842€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð à ÐApp.,€Knoxville,€April€12,€1989).€€The€Supreme€Court€granted€the€stateððs€application€on€theÏquestion€of€a€jury€instruction€in€the€habitual€criminal€phase.€€òòState€v.€Gary€Wayne€Loweóó,Ð P   ÐNo.€192,€1990€WL€16821€ñ¸ñœñ¸ñ(Tenn.,€February€5,ñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñ€1990).€€The€Supreme€Court€eventuallyÏreversed€this€Courtððs€remand€on€the€jury€instruction€issue€and€dismissed€the€petition€forÏfailure€to€state€a€claim.€€òòLowe€v.€Stateóó,€805€S.W.2d€368,€372€(Tenn.€1991).Ð ð@  ÐÌà ` àWhile€the€second€petition€for€post„conviction€was€pending,€the€petitioner€filed€theÏcurrent€petition€in€June€1988,€again€alleging€the€1979€guilty€plea€was€invalid€for€failure€ofÏthe€trial€court€to€advise€him€of€his€right€of€self„incrimination€and€failure€to€warn€him€that€theÏconviction€could€be€used€to€enhance€future€sentences.€€The€trial€court€dismissed€thisÏpetition,€holding€the€petitioner€was€barred€from€collaterally€challenging€the€prior€guilty€pleaÏbased€upon€the€Supreme€Courtððs€dismissal€of€his€second€petition.€€Upon€direct€appeal,€thisÏCourt€reversed€the€trial€courtððs€judgment€and€remanded€for€an€evidentiary€hearing.€€òòGaryÐ ð@ ÐWayne€Lowe€v.€Stateóó,€No.€03C01„9702„CC„00049,€1997€LEXIS€1114€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð Ð  ÐKnoxville,€October€31,€1997).€€As€can€be€seen,€the€petitioner€has€developed€a€substantialÏappellate€history€in€his€quest€for€freedom.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓPOST„CONVICTION€HEARINGÐ P( #& ÐA.€€Guilty€Pleaó óÐ 0*€%( ÐÓ!ÓÌò òà ` àó óIn€1979,€the€petitioner,€who€has€an€eighth€grade€education€and€is€a€laborer€by€trade,Ð ð-@), Ðtestified€he€pled€guilty€to€grand€larceny€because€of€an€accompliceððs€testimony€in€a€pendingÏtrial.€€The€petitioner€contended€his€only€involvement€was€that€he€was€standing€next€to€theÏstolen€truck,€and€he€did€not€steal€the€truck.ò ò€€ó óThe€petitioner€acknowledged€that€the€trial€courtÐ 3à.2 Ðhad€presided€over€two€previous€criminal€trials€involving€the€petitioner.€€Also,€the€petitionerÏhad€undergone€a€third€trial€before€Chancellor€Kidwell€for€a€criminal€offense.€€The€petitionerÏrecalled€the€trial€court€advised€him€about€the€habitual€criminal€act,€but€he€did€not€know€whatÐ 09€48 Ðit€meant.Ìà ` àÌà ` àKen€Krushenski,€attorney,€testified€he€was€appointed€to€represent€the€petitioner€and€Ïnegotiated€a€plea€of€guilty€between€the€state€and€the€petitioner.€€Since€this€plea€wasÏentered€in€1979,€Mr.€Krushenski€had€no€independent€recollection€of€the€plea€except€fromÏhis€reading€of€the€court€files.€€Mr.€Krushenski,€who€had€represented€other€defendants€inÏAnderson€County€as€well€as€other€counties,€followed€certain€procedures€when€representingÏclients.€€It€was€Mr.€Krushenskiððs€custom€to€review€the€facts€of€the€case€with€each€client.€ÏAfter€gathering€the€facts€from€witnesses€and€the€stateððs€evidence,€Mr.€Krushenski€wouldÏgive€a€defendant€an€idea€of€what€the€defendant€could€expect€if€he€went€to€trial,€orÏalternatively,€if€there€was€a€plea€offer.€€As€part€of€his€procedures,€Mr.€Krushenski€wouldÏdiscuss€the€plea€offer€with€a€defendant,€the€potential€witnessesðð€testimony,€and€theÏdefendantððs€own€testimony.ÌÌà ` àMr.€Krushenski€testified€he€was€confident€that,€on€the€guilty€plea€date,€he€and€theÏpetitioner€read€the€petition€of€waiver€utilized€in€Anderson€County,€and€he€answered€anyÏquestions€the€petitioner€might€have€had.€€During€cross„examination,€Mr.€KrushenskiÏtestified€he€would€have€discussed€with€the€petitioner€what€was€contained€in€the€petition€ofÏwaiver€form.€€Mr.€Krushenski€had€no€recollection€of€discussing€with€the€petitioner€his€rightÏagainst€self„incrimination,€since€the€right€was€not€set€forth€in€the€waiver€petition.ÌÌà ` àRon€Ridenour,€attorney,€testified€he€represented€the€petitioner€in€two€criminal€trialsÏprior€to€1979.€€In€the€petitionerððs€first€trial,€the€petitioner€was€accused€of€receiving€a€stolenÏChevrolet€Nova.€€At€the€conclusion€of€the€stateððs€proof,€the€petitioner€elected€not€to€testify.€ÏPrior€to€this€decision,€Mr.€Ridenour€discussed€with€the€petitioner€his€right€to€testify€or€notÏtestify,€and€it€was€Mr.€Ridenourððs€advice€that€the€petitioner€not€testify.€€Mr.€RidenourÏrecalled€that€a€written€waiver€of€rights€form€signed€by€the€petitioner€was€introduced€at€trial.ÌÌà ` àMr.€Ridenour€testified€the€petitionerððs€second€trial€occurred€in€December€1978,€whenÐ 09€48 Ðthe€petitioner€was€accused€of€breaking€into€a€pickup€truck€in€order€to€steal€it.€€The€petitionerÏelected€to€testify€in€this€second€trial.€€Mr.€Ridenour€and€the€petitioner€did€not€discuss€theÏpetitionerððs€right€to€testify€or€not,€since€it€was€never€in€doubt€that€the€petitioner€would€testify.ÌÌà ` àTo€assist€the€trial€court€in€its€determination€of€the€issue,€seven€exhibits€wereÏsubmitted€by€stipulation:€€(1)€petition€for€waiver€of€jury€trial€and€request€for€acceptance€ofÏplea€of€guilty;€(2)€guilty€plea€transcript;€(3)€stipulation€of€facts;€(4),€(5),€(6),€and€(7),€certifiedÏdocuments€from€the€petitionerððs€prior€court€cases.ÌÌà ` àIn€a€well„written€opinion€of€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law,€the€trial€courtÏdenied€the€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€The€trial€court€found€the€guilty€plea€of€1979Ïwas€knowingly€and€voluntarily€entered€by€the€petitioner.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓB.€LEGAL€ANALYSISó óÐ ` ÐÓ‡,ÓÌà ` àThe€petitioner€contends€the€trial€court€was€in€error€for€finding€that€the€petitioner€knewÏof€his€right€against€self„incrimination€and€was€waiving€the€same€in€his€1979€guilty€plea.€€TheÏstate€counters€that€the€guilty€plea€transcript,€coupled€with€the€petitionerððs€experiences€inÏthe€criminal€justice€system,€demonstrates€the€petitionerððs€plea€was€knowing€and€voluntary.ÌÌà ` àFindings€of€the€post„conviction€court€are€binding€on€appeal€unless€the€evidenceÏpreponderates€otherwise.€€òòButler€v.€Stateóó,€789€S.W.2d€898,€899€(Tenn.€1990);€òòHarries€v.Ð ,`'* ÐStateóó,€958€S.W.2d€799,€802€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòper.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1997).€€This€CourtÐ ð-@), Ðmay€not€reweigh€or€reevaluate€the€evidence€or€substitute€its€inferences€for€those€drawn€byÏthe€post„conviction€court.€€Moreover,€questions€concerning€the€credibility€of€witnesses€andÏweight€and€value€to€be€given€their€testimony€are€for€resolution€by€the€post„conviction€court.€ÏòòBlack€v.€Stateóó,€794€S.W.2d€752,€755€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòper.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1990).Ð p5À04 ÐÌà ` àWhen€a€defendant€ñ¸ñœñ¸ñpleadsñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñ€guilty,€he€or€she€simultaneously€waives€severalÐ 09€48 Ðconstitutional€rights,€including€the€right€against€compulsory€self„incrimination,€the€right€toÏa€jury€trial,€and€the€right€to€confront€and€cross„examine€witnesses.€€òòBoykin€v.€Alabamaóó,€395Ð à ÐU.S.€238,€243,€89€S.Ct.€1709,€1712,€23€L.Ed.2d€274€(1969);€òòState€v.€Mackeyóó,€553€S.W.2dÐ pÀ Ð337,€339„40€(Tenn.€1977).€€Also,€in€òòMackeyóó,€our€Supreme€Court€applied€stricterÐ P   Ðrequirements€than€in€òòBoykinóó€for€trial€courts€in€accepting€guilty€pleas.€€Most€of€them€wereÐ 0 € Ðincorporated€in€Rule€11,€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(c)(3)€That€the€defendant€has€the€right€to€plead€not€guilty€or€toÏpersist€in€that€plea€if€it€has€already€been€made,€and€the€right€toÏbe€tried€by€a€jury€and€at€that€trial€the€right€to€the€assistance€ofÏcounsel,€the€right€to€confront€and€cross-examine€witnessesÏagainst€him€or€her,€and€the€right€against€compelledÏself-incrimination.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à*€*€*Ì€Ìà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(d)€Insuring€That€the€Plea€Is€Voluntary.€The€court€shall€notÏaccept€a€plea€of€guilty€or€nolo€contendere€without€first,€byÏaddressing€the€defendant€personally€in€open€court,Ïdetermining€that€the€plea€is€voluntary€and€not€the€result€ofÏforce€or€threats€or€of€promises€apart€from€a€plea€agreement.ÏThe€court€shall€also€inquire€as€to€whether€the€defendant'sÏwillingness€to€plead€guilty€or€nolo€contendere€results€from€priorÏdiscussions€between€the€district€attorney€general€and€theÏdefendant€or€the€defendant's€attorney.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ЀÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à*€*€*Ì€Ìà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(f)€Determining€Accuracy€of€Plea.€Notwithstanding€theÏacceptance€of€a€plea€of€guilty,€the€court€should€not€enter€aÏjudgment€upon€such€plea€without€making€such€inquiry€as€shallÏsatisfy€it€that€there€is€a€factual€basis€for€the€plea.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ЀÌÌÌÓÓà ` àIn€its€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law,€the€trial€court€candidly€admitted€it€failedÏto€advise€the€petitioner€during€his€guilty€plea€proceeding€that€he€was€waiving€any€right€ofÏself„incrimination.€€However,€through€extrinsic€evidence,€the€state€was€able€to€establish€theÏpetitionerððs€prior€knowledge€of€the€right€of€self„incrimination,€citing€òòJohnson€v.€Stateóó,€834Ð Ð/ +. ÐS.W.2d€922€(Tenn.€1992)€and€òòState€v.€Nealóó,€810€S.W.2d€131€(Tenn.€1991).€€Thus,€theÐ °1-0 Ðpetitionerððs€guilty€plea€was€knowingly€and€voluntarily€entered€on€July€17,€1979.€€Since€thisÏplea€was€entered€in€July€1979,€the€requirements€of€òòMackeyóó€and€Rule€11,€Tenn.€R.€Crim.Ð p5À04 ÐP.,€are€applicable€to€this€case.ÌÐ 09€48 Ðà ` àThe€petitioner€contends€his€case€is€precisely€on€point€with€òòState€v.€Montgomeryóó,€840Ð ° ÐS.W.2d€900€(Tenn.€1992).€€In€òòMontgomeryóó,€after€considering€the€holdings€of€òòNealóó€andÐ à ÐòòJohnsonóó,€our€Supreme€Court€reversed€guilty€pleas€entered€in€1973€stating:€€ð ðHowever,Ð pÀ Ðunlike€the€situation€in€òòNealóó€and€òòJohnsonóó,€there€is€no€evidence€in€this€case€that€theÐ P   Ðdefendant€was,€in€fact€aware€of€the€privilege€against€self„incrimination,€despite€his€notÏbeing€advised€of€that€right€by€the€trial€judge.ðð€€òòMontgomeryóó,€840€S.W.2d€at€902.Ð `  ÐÌà ` àIn€òòNealóó,€810€S.W.2d€at€139„40,€our€Supreme€Court€stated:Ð Ð  ÐÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à€€€€In€a€case€where€the€erroneous€omission€is€the€basis€forÏrelief€under€a€post-conviction€petition,€the€defendant-petitionerÏmust€allege€and€prove€the€omission,€and€that€but€for€theÏomission€the€guilty€plea€would€not€have€been€entered.€If€thisÏthesis€is€established€prima€facie,€then€the€burden€shifts€to€theÏState€to€justify€the€error€by€establishing€through€extrinsicÏevidence€the€defendant's€knowing€and€voluntaryÏrelinquishment€of€the€involved€constitutional€protections,Ïdespite€the€erroneous€omission.€If€the€State€can€demonstrateÏthat€the€error€was€harmless€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt,€thenÏthe€judgment€stands.€If€a€reasonable€doubt€exists€at€the€closeÏof€the€proof,€then€the€judgment€must€be€set€aside.€€(citationsÏomitted).Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÌÌÓÓà ` àTherefore,€if€the€state€can€establish€that€a€petitioner€was€aware€of€his€rights,€he€isÏnot€entitled€to€relief€regardless€of€whether€the€trial€court€informed€him€of€all€his€rights.€ÏòòJohnson€v.€Stateóó,€834€S.W.2d€922,€926€(Tenn.€1992).׃ ×Ý ƒ %ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€result€is€substantialÐ p&À!$ Ðcompliance€with€the€òòBoykinóó€mandate.Ð P( #& ÐÌà ` àWe€find€from€this€record€that€the€state€has€successfully€carried€its€burden€byÏextrinsic€evidence€that€the€petitioner€at€the€time€of€his€guilty€plea,€was€aware€of€his€rightÏof€self„incrimination.€€The€record€establishes€the€petitioner€proceeded€to€trial€in€OctoberÏ1978€for€the€offense€of€receiving€and€concealing€stolen€property.€€The€jury€found€theÏdefendant€guilty€of€receiving€stolen€property€and€imposed€a€sentence€of€not€more€thanÐ 3à.2 Ðthree€years€and€not€less€than€three€years€in€the€state€penitentiary.€€Since€the€defendant€didÏnot€testify€at€this€trial,€the€trial€court€instructed€the€jury:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àThe€defendant€has€not€taken€the€stand€to€testify€as€a€witness,Ïbut€you€shall€place€no€significance€on€this€fact.€€The€defendantÏis€presumed€innocent,€and€the€burden€is€on€the€State€to€proveÏhis€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€He€is€not€required€to€takeÏthe€stand€in€his€own€behalf,€and€his€failure€to€do€so€cannot€beÏconsidered€for€any€purpose€against€him,€nor€can€any€inferenceÏbe€drawn€from€such€fact.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÌÌÓÓà ` àThe€record€establishes€that€a€written€statement€given€by€the€petitioner€wasÏintroduced€at€trial€wherein€the€petitioner€had€signed€an€ð ðAdmonition€and€Waiverðð€of€hisÏrights€form€which€included€the€petitionerððs€right€of€self„incrimination.€€The€petitionerððsÏcounsel€testified€at€the€evidentiary€hearing€that€he€advised€the€petitioner€of€his€right€toÏtestify€or€not,€but€advised€the€petitioner€not€to€testify.ÌÌà ` àAlso,€the€record€reflects€the€petitioner€proceeded€to€ñ¸ñœñ¸ñtrialñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñ€with€the€same€ñ¸ñœñ¸ñattorneyñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñ€inÏDecember€1978€for€the€offense€of€burglary€third€ñ¸ñœñ¸ñdegree.€€Theñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñ€jury€ñ¸ñœñ¸ñfoundñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñ€him€guilty€ofÏattempt€to€commit€a€felony€and€ñ¸ñœñ¸ñimposedñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñ€a€sentence€of€six€months.€€The€petitioner€testifiedÏin€this€trial,€and€the€trial€court€instructed€the€jury€as€to€the€credibility€of€the€defendant€as€aÏwitness.ÌÌà ` àThe€petitioner€proceeded€to€trial€on€July€3,€1979,€through€another€attorney,€for€theÏoffense€of€attempted€murder€first€degree.€€The€jury€found€the€defendant€guilty€of€aiding€andÏabetting€David€Graham€in€an€assault€with€the€intent€to€commit€voluntary€manslaughter€andÏimposed€a€sentence€of€ninety€days€and€a€fine€of€$500.ÌÌñ¸ñœ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñœñ¸ñà ` àñ¸ñ›ñ¸ññ¸ññ¸ññ¸ñœñ¸ñAt€the€guilty€plea€hearing€on€July€17,€1979,€the€trial€court€ñ¸ñthorouglyñ¸ññ¸ñthoroughlyñ¸ñ€informed€theÏpetitioner€of€his€rights€prior€to€accepting€his€plea.€€The€trial€court€informed€the€œpetitionerñ¹ñ€ofñ¹ñ:›€Ï(1)€the€charges€against€ñ¸ñ›œñ¸ñhim€and€that€the€state€had€the€burden€of€proving€them;€(2)€theÏpotential€sentence€and€the€sentence€agreed€upon€in€the€plea€agreement;€(3)€theÏpetitionerððs€right€to€a€trial€by€jury€and€the€stateððs€obligation€to€prove€the€charges€beyond€aÐ 09€48 Ðreasonable€doubt;€(4)€œñºñthe›€trial›€court›€inquired›€ñºñif›€the€petitioner€had€fully€discussed€the€charges€with€his€attorney€andÏwhether€he€was€satisfied€with€œñ»ñhis€ñ»ñrepresentation;›€(5)€œñ¼ñthat€ñ¼ñthe›€petitioner€had€a€right€toÏconfront€the€witnesses€against€him;€(6)€the€conviction€could€be€used€to€deem€the€petitionerÏan€habitual€criminal€in€the€future;€(7)€œñ½ñthe›€trial›€court›€informed›€the›€petitioner›€of›€ñ½ññ¾ñof€ñ¾ñthe›€evidence€against€him;€and€(8)€by€pleadingÏguilty,€ñ¸ñthñ¸ññ¸ñtheñ¸ñ€ñ¸ñepetitionerñ¸ññ¸ñpetitionerñ¸ñ€was€waiving€his€right€to€appeal.€€Except€for€the€advice€against€self„¼incrimination,€the€trial€court€fully€complied€with€the€mandates€of€òòState€v.€Mackeyóó,€553Ð `  ÐS.W.2d€337,€339„40€(Tenn.€1977).€€The€petitioner€acknowledged€that€his€plea€wasÏknowing,€intelligent,€and€voluntary.€€As€to€the€petitionerððs€reasons€for€pleading€guilty,€theÏfollowing€colloquy€took€place€between€the€trial€court€and€the€petitioner:ñ¸ñ›ñ¸ñÌÓ'X„X/ h–X°œX'ÓÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àQ.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àNow€are€you€pleading€guilty€to€this€charge€of€grandÐ à Ðlarceny€because€you€are€in€fact€guilty€of€it?Ð / Y/ Y ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àA.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àNo,€not€really.Ð`°/ Y/ Y ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àQ.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àWhy€are€you€doing€it?Ð@/ Y/ Y ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àA.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àTo€keep€from€getting€more€time.Ð p/ Y/ Y ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àQ.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àHuh?ÐP/ Y/ Y ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àA.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àTo€keep€from€getting€more€time.Ðà0/ Y/ Y ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àQ.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àTo€keep€from€getting€more€time.€€You€understand€thatÐ À! Ðif€these€witnesses€were€called€to€testify€in€this€case,Ïthat€a€jury€could€convict€you€on€the€basis€of€thisÏevidence?Ð / Y/ Y ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àA.à / àYes.Ðp&À!$¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àQ.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àAnd€that€in€spite€of€the€fact€that€you€say€that€this€oneÐ P( #& Ðwitness,€Jimmy€Maggard,€is€lying;€that€they€mightÏbelieve€him€and€not€you?€€Is€that€the€reason€you€areÏpleading€guilty?Ð / Y/ Y ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àA.à8/ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àYes.Ð-P(+/ Y/ Y ÐÌÌñ¸ñœñ¸ñÌÓÓà ` àIn€ñ¸ññ¯ñconcusionñ¯ññ¸ññ¸ñconclusionñ¸ñ,€we€are€convinced€that€the€ñ¸ññ±ñpeittionerñ±ññ¸ññ¸ñpetitionerñ¸ñ€desired€to€plead€guilty,€even€inÏthe€absence€of€the€advice€against€self„incriñµñmination,€to€obtain€the€certainty€of€his€sentenceÏrather€than€have€the€jury€impose€a€more€severe€sentence.€€We€find€the€ñµññ¸ññµñpeititonerñµññ¸ññ¸ñpetitionerñ¸ññµñ€has€failedÏto€carry€his€burden€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€his€plea€of€guilty€was€notÏknowingly,€intelligently,€and€voluntarily€entered€on€ñµññ¶ññµñJulyñµññ¶ññ¶ñJulyñ¶ññµñ€ñµññ·ñ17,€1979.ÌÐ  :p59 Ðà ` àThe€trial€courtððs€judgment€is€affirmed.ñ·ññ·ñ›ñ·ñÌÌÌÓÓÔ‡X:¶XXXìÔà ` àà ¸ àà / àà h àà À àà  à________________________________________Ð P   Ðà ` àà ¸ àà / àà h àà À àà  àL.€T.€LAFFERTY,€SENIOR€JUDGEÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌ___________________________________Ô#†XìXXX:¶l]#ÔÐ þN ÐNORMA€McGEE€OGLE,€JUDGEÌÌÌ