ÿWPCK ±`“ü s}˜ñ;ØÒ—1ã7ÍÆ¯UqĦºB×$|˜}êñ»¬9Í{´ó,»QõÆ´”Æ ˆÿŒ¨¦cNoþB}qÖa{—Ýçw21D½×ðþ˜~†„¡xã=¥ÀcúݶãIÑ2ãÀ^®¸“¤?׺ &6-?}‹Uä§hv` ÔBÜ}(—4®¥o|Ö:ÕŠÃRÛ7±7¢ZÕQ\ñ[q_¬R7ᗩ⦕ê[00±\`êǘ*í_=Hè.àÒ]ÃùZ×™ÖÞŠ½Ÿ«™¦Ö%㬗·†¢$#4÷9ªAº;°lÏ—½$ÿTjàÉñ=o±z2šÄ²ôÐí΃qÔÁZé€[FQÞŸãm­K…›’Œilðî¾?‰r“?ÉǸŠÓD•§ A¦Èr cã‰ëpãÆtÅ),~£Ël³òÌî2¡d÷9&„µ»jÊ]½<±jú?eШø°€gÐÁC œE jŠéþ—CBos~È;ÄÜF®ðnJ̧̳Þâ 5qãù}·JyÜŸ t€bÍ=¾T.í·=ÈúÖp<ÇìXQÞíÝ´Å`¡¸½œ¯bl@{X-OºÔÜBà¾ëð£»s£˜Ö‡F€Lb Õ\ ŸIœâdbUN\ %ª 0ˆ°^ 8wD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ UN‘ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1÷NÿÿÿEbù   0D 0ëHHHH B33 0¤P D3ô D-' 0KTT ASŸÆò 0¤¸ 0D\ A« (ÈhH  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Óy­-s üPH,Œ£°¥3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - ù- ïÝ ƒR¡y$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô—|ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔIn€fairness€to€the€trial€court,€we€note€that€this€case€was€tried€before€the€decision€in€òòBurnsóó€was€released.(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(|G2¡y$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€(ô»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô—|ò»»Ô d(|3‡v$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€(ô»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3‡v$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€(ô»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€(ô»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼(ô»»»ÔÑ8€k˜XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î!(ôÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼(ô»îî! #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àJune€18,€2002€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡Xk˜X»¼(ôÔÌò òÔ#†¼(ô»XXk˜#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€HERMAN€MAJORS,€JR.òòóóÔ‡Xk˜X»¼(ôÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Montgomery€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€41078€€€€€€John€H.€Gasaway,€III,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„02143„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€August€29,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡ Xk˜XXXk˜ÔThe€Appellant,€Herman€Majors,€Jr.,was€indicted€for€attempted€aggravated€robbery€based€upon€aÐ xÈ  Ðtheory€of€criminal€responsibility€for€the€conduct€of€another.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„402(2).€€AÐ d´ ÐMontgomery€County€jury€found€Majors€guilty€of€the€indicted€offense,€resulting€in€a€twelve„yearÐ P  Ðsentence€as€a€persistent€offender.€In€this€appeal€as€of€right,€Majors€argues€that€the€trial€court€erredÐ <Œ Ðby€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€as€to€the€lesser€offense€of€facilitation€of€attempted€aggravated€robbery,Ð (x ÐÓÓTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€39„11„403€(1997).€€After€a€review€of€the€record,€we€conclude€that€theÐ d Ðtrial€court€erred€in€not€instructing€the€jury€as€to€facilitation.€Majorsðð€conviction€is€reversed,€and€theÐ P Ðcase€is€remanded€for€a€new€trial.Ô#†Xk˜XX Xk˜¾#ÔÔ#†¼(ô»XXk˜#ÔÔ‡Xk˜X»¼(ôÔÐ ì< ÐÓ²ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Reversed;€Remanded€for€a€New€Trial.ó óÐ Ä ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼(ô»àXk˜¤#ÔÔ‡Xk˜X.¼(ôÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòAlan€E.€Glennóó€and€òòRobert€W.Ð œì ÐWedemeyeróó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð ˆØ ÐÌMichael€J.€Love,€Cartwright€&€Love,€Clarksville,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Herman€Majors,€Jr.Ð `° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€Kim€R.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐHelper,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€John€Wesley€Carney,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€C.Ð $"t! ÐDaniel€Brollier,€Jr.,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð #`" ÐÔ#†¼(ô»XXk˜Œ #ÔÔ‡Xk˜X»¼(ôÔÌÓ] ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼(ô»XXk˜G #ÔÔ‡Xk˜X»¼(ôÔÐ Ô%$!% ÐÌò òFactual€Backgroundó óÐ ¬'ü"' ÐòòóóÔ#†¼(ô»XXk˜º #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€Xk˜X»¼(ôÔÌÔ‡ Xk˜XXXk˜Ôà  àOn€November€12,€1997,€Regina€Young,€a€cashier€at€the€Amoco€Station€on€Old€Ashland€CityÐ „)Ô$) ÐRoad€in€Clarksville,€was€cleaning€shelves€at€the€store€in€preparation€for€an€upcoming€inspection.€Ð p*À%* ÐYoung€was€able€to€see€customers€as€they€came€into€the€store€by€looking€into€a€mirror€on€the€wall.€Ð \+¬&+ ÐAt€approximately€eight€oððclock€in€the€evening,€Young€saw€Will€Stacker€enter€the€store€and€leaveÐ H,˜', Ðabruptly.€€Young,€realizing€that€Stacker€could€not€see€her,€stood€up€and€walked€to€the€front€of€theÐ 4-„(-ýG Ðstore.€€Stacker,€wearing€a€blue€bandana€covering€his€face,€re„entered€the€store€and€demanded€money.€Ð ° ÐHe€had€his€ð ðright€hand€tucked€up€underneath€ð!ð€into€his€pocket.€€It€looked€like€he€had€a€gun.ðð€€YoungÐ œì Ðproceeded€to€the€cash€register€and€began€to€get€the€money€out.€€At€this€time,€Stacker€ð ðdid€somethingÐ ˆØ Ðwith€his€right€hand,€and€[Young]€saw€this€wooden€handle€pop€out.ðð€€Thereafter,€Young,€believingÐ tÄ ÐStacker€did€not€have€a€gun,€refused€to€give€him€any€money,€and€he€left€the€store.€€Stacker€got€intoÐ `° Ða€black€pickup€truck€driven€by€the€Appellant,€who€gestured€to€Stacker€as€if€to€say,€ð ðWhatððs€goingÐ L œ Ðon?ðð€€As€Stacker€was€leaving€the€store,€another€customer€came€into€the€store,€and€Young€asked€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðcustomer€to€get€the€license€plate€number€of€the€truck.€€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àDuring€the€course€of€the€attempted€robbery,€the€Appellant€was€sitting€in€the€truck€with€hisÐ ü L  Ðhands€on€the€steering€wheel€looking€into€the€store.€€After€the€failed€robbery,€Stacker€entered€the€truckÐ è 8  Ðand€the€Appellant€drove€hurriedly€out€of€the€parking€lot.€€After€a€high€speed€police€chase,€theÐ Ô$  ÐAppellant€and€Stacker€were€apprehended.€€The€Appellant€was€transported€by€Officer€EddieÐ À  ÐChancellor€to€the€Amoco€station€for€a€show„up€identification.€€During€this€time,€the€Appellant€statedÐ ¬ü  Ðto€Officer€Chancellor€that€if€he€ð ðcould€help€him€out€of€this€particular€little€bit€of€trouble€that€he€hadÐ ˜è  Ðgot€himself€in€that€he€could€confess€to€.€.€.€€some€shit€that€you€all€donððt€even€know€about.ðð€€TheÐ „Ô  ÐAppellant€also€said€that€ð ðhe€thought€[the€police]€could€have€done€a€better€job€pursuing€him.ðð€€OfficerÐ pÀ ÐDaryn€Lovelace€was€also€in€the€car€and€recalled€that€the€Appellant€said,€ð ðhe€had€done€what€he€hadÐ \¬ Ðdoneðð€to€support€a€drug€habit.€€Once€at€the€police€station,€a€blue€bandana€was€removed€from€theÐ H˜ ÐAppellantððs€neck.Ð 4„ Ѐ€Ð  p Ðà  àOn€September€7,€1999,€a€Montgomery€County€grand€jury€indicted€the€Appellant€forÐ  \ Ðattempted€aggravated€robbery€and€evading€arrest.€€The€Appellant€pled€guilty€to€evading€arrest.€€OnÐ øH ÐOctober€26,€1999,€after€a€trial€by€jury,€the€Appellant€was€found€guilty€of€attempted€aggravatedÐ ä4 Ðrobbery.€€This€timely€appeal€followed.Ð Ð  ÐÌÓ  Óò òANALYSISó óÐ ¨ø ÐÌÓ*Óà  àThe€Appellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€on€the€offenseÐ €Ð Ðof€facilitation€of€attempted€aggravated€robbery€as€a€lesser„included€offense€of€attempted€aggravatedÐ l¼ Ðrobbery.€€As€previously€noted,€the€Appellantððs€prosecution€was€based€upon€the€theory€that€he€wasÐ X ¨ Ðcriminally€responsible€for€the€attempted€robbery€by€aiding€or€attempting€to€aid€Stacker€in€theÐ D!” Ðcommission€of€the€offense.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„402(2)€(1997).€€Specifically,€he€argues€thatÐ 0"€  Ðthe€evidence€presented€at€trial€could€have€supported€a€finding€that€he€ð ðknowingly€furnishe[d]Ð #l! Ðsubstantial€assistanceðð€in€the€attempted€robbery€of€the€Amoco€station€but€lacked€the€intent€toÐ $X" Ðpromote€or€assist€the€commission€of€the€offense,€or€to€benefit€in€the€proceeds€or€results€of€theÐ ô$D # Ðoffense.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„403(a)€(1997).€€The€State€responds€that€an€instruction€onÐ à%0!$ Ðfacilitation€was€unwarranted€because,€ð ðbased€upon€the€facts€of€this€particular€case€and€defendantððsÐ Ì&"% Ðtheory,€the€evidence€did€not€support€an€instruction€on€facilitation.ððÐ ¸'#& ÐÌà  àAt€trial,€the€Appellant€did€not€request€an€instruction€on€the€lesser€offense.€€However,Ð )à$( Ðirrespective€of€any€request€for€a€lesser„included€jury€instruction,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„18„Ð |*Ì%) Ð110(a),€as€in€effect€at€the€time€of€the€Appellantððs€trial,€provided:Ð h+¸&* Їà8  àIt€is€the€duty€of€all€judges€charging€juries€in€cases€of€criminal€prosecutions€for€anyÐ ° Ðfelony€where€two€(2)€or€more€grades€or€classes€of€offense€may€be€included€in€theÐ œì Ðindictment,€to€charge€the€jury€as€to€all€of€the€law€of€each€offense€included€in€theÐ ˆØ Ðindictment,€without€any€request€on€the€part€of€the€defendant€to€do€so.€ÐtÄÐ Ð  ÐÌÓIÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„18„110(a)€(1997).€€An€offense€is€a€lesser-included€offense€if:€Ð L œ ÐÓs"Óà8  à(a)€all€of€its€statutory€elements€are€included€within€the€statutory€elements€of€theÐ $ t Ðoffense€charged;€orÐ `Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à(b)€it€fails€to€meet€the€definition€in€part€(a)€only€in€the€respect€that€it€contains€aÐ è 8  Ðstatutory€element€or€elements€establishing:ÐÔ$ Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà8 ` à(1)€a€different€mental€state€indicating€a€lesser€kind€of€culpability;Ð ¬ü  Ðand/orИè ` x` x ÐÌà  àà8 ` à(2)€a€less€serious€harm€or€risk€of€harm€to€the€same€person,€property€orÐ pÀ Ðpublic€interest;€orÐ\¬` x` x ÐÌà8  à(c)€it€consists€ofÐ4„Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà8 ` à(1)€facilitation€of€the€offense€charged€.€.€.€;€orÐ \` x` x ÐÌà  àà8 ` à(2)€an€attempt€to€commit€the€offense€charged€.€.€.€;€orÐä4` x` x ÐÌà  àà8 ` à(3)€solicitation€to€commit€the€offense€charged.€€Ð¼ ` x` x ÐÌòòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€453,€466„67€(Tenn.1999).׃G×Ý ƒI#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€€Whether€a€lesser-included€offense€must€beÐ ”ä Ðcharged€in€a€jury€instruction€is€a€two-part€inquiry.€€òòId.€óóat€467.€€First,€the€trial€court€must€apply€theÐ €Ð ÐòòBurnsóó€test€to€determine€whether€a€particular€lesser€offense€is€included€in€the€greater€charged€offense.€Ð l¼ ÐòòId.€€óóIf€a€lesser€offense€is€not€included€in€the€offense€charged,€then€an€instruction€should€not€be€given,Ð X ¨ Ðregardless€of€whether€evidence€supports€it.€€òòId.€€óóIf,€however,€the€trial€court€concludes€that€a€lesserÐ D!” Ðoffense€is€included€in€the€charged€offense,€the€question€remains€whether€the€evidence€justifies€a€juryÐ 0"€  Ðinstruction€on€such€lesser€offense.òò€€Id.€óóÐ #l! ÐÌà  àAggravated€robbery€is€defined€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€39„13„402(a)€as€ð ðrobbery€asÐ ô$D # Ðdefined€in€ðð€39„13„401:€€(1)€Accomplished€with€a€deadly€weapon€or€by€display€of€any€article€usedÐ à%0!$ Ðor€fashioned€to€lead€the€victim€to€reasonably€believe€it€to€be€a€deadly€weapon;€or€(2)€Where€theÐ Ì&"% Ðvictim€suffers€serious€bodily€injury.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„402(a).€€Robbery€is€defined€inÐ ¸'#& ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€39„13„401(a)€as€ð ðthe€intentional€or€knowing€theft€of€property€from€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðperson€of€another€by€violence€or€putting€the€person€in€fear.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„401(a)Ð )à$( Ð(1997).€€Additionally,€ð ð[a]€person€is€criminally€responsible€for€the€facilitation€of€a€felony€if,€knowingÐ ° Ðthat€another€intends€to€commit€a€specific€felony,€but€without€the€intent€required€for€criminalÐ œì Ðresponsibility€under€ðð€39„11„402(2),€the€person€knowingly€furnishes€substantial€assistance€in€theÐ ˆØ Ðcommission€of€the€felony.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„403(a).Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àOur€supreme€court€has€held€that€"virtually€every€time€one€is€charged€with€a€felony€by€wayÐ L œ Ðof€criminal€responsibility€for€the€conduct€of€another,€facilitation€of€the€felony€would€be€a€lesser„Ð 8 ˆ Ðincluded€offense."€€òòState€v.€Fowleróó,€23€S.W.3d€285,€288€(Tenn.€2000);€òòseeóó€òòBurnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€470.Ð $ t ÐThe€Appellant€was€charged€and€tried€under€the€theory€of€criminal€responsibility€for€the€conduct€ofÐ  ` ÐWill€Stacker,€and€we,€therefore,€hold€that€facilitation€of€attempted€aggravated€robbery€is€a€lesser„Ð ü L  Ðincluded€offense€under€part€(c)€of€the€òòBurnsóó€test.€€òòSee€State€v.€Allen,€óó69€S.W.3d€181,€187€(Tenn.Ð è 8  Ð2002).€€Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àNext,€we€examine€whether€the€evidence€presented€at€trial€justified€a€jury€instruction€onÐ ¬ü  Ðfacilitation€of€attempted€aggravated€€robbery.€€The€following€two„step€analysis€is€required:€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà8  àFirst,€the€trial€court€must€determine€whether€any€evidence€exists€that€reasonableÐ pÀ Ðminds€could€accept€as€to€the€lesser„included€offense.€In€making€this€determination,Ð \¬ Ðthe€trial€court€must€view€the€evidence€liberally€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€theÐ H˜ Ðexistence€of€the€lesser„included€offense€without€making€any€judgments€on€theÐ 4„ Ðcredibility€of€such€evidence.€€Second,€the€trial€court€must€determine€if€the€evidence,Ð  p Ðviewed€in€this€light,€is€legally€sufficient€to€support€a€conviction€for€the€lesser„Ð  \ Ðincluded€offense.€ÐøHÐ Ð  ÐÌòòBurnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€469.€€Error€in€omitting€a€lesser„included€offense€instruction€is€not€negated€merelyÐ Ð  Ðbecause€the€evidence€also€is€sufficient€to€convict€on€the€greater€offense.€€òòAllenóó,€69€S.W.3d€at€187Ð ¼  Ð(citing€òòState€v.€Bowlesóó,€52€S.W.3d€69,€75€(Tenn.€2001)).€€The€Appellant€need€not€demonstrate€a€basisÐ ¨ø Ðfor€acquittal€on€the€greater€offense€to€be€entitled€to€an€instruction€on€the€lesser€offense.€òòId.óó€(citingÐ ”ä ÐòòBowles,€óó522€S.W.3d€at€69.)òò€€óóThe€trial€court€must€provide€an€instruction€on€a€lesser„included€offenseÐ €Ð Ðsupported€by€the€evidence€even€if€such€instruction€is€not€consistent€with€the€theory€of€the€State€orÐ l¼ Ðof€the€defense.€€The€evidence,€not€the€theories€of€the€parties,€controls€whether€an€instruction€isÐ X ¨ Ðrequired.€€òòId.óó€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àThe€proof,€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€existence€of€the€lesser„included€offense,€revealsÐ #l! Ðthat€the€Appellant€waited€in€a€black€pickup€truck€outside€the€Amoco€station€while€Stacker€wentÐ $X" Ðinside€and€attempted€to€rob€the€store€clerk.€€When€Stacker€got€inside€the€vehicle€after€the€failedÐ ô$D # Ðrobbery,€the€Appellant€motioned€to€Stacker€as€if€to€say,€ð ðWhatððs€going€on?ðð€€Thereafter,€theÐ à%0!$ ÐAppellant€and€Stacker€fled€the€scene,€and€a€high€speed€chase€ensued.€€There€was€no€direct€evidenceÐ Ì&"% Ðthat€the€Appellant€would€have€benefitted€in€the€proceeds€of€the€robbery.€€We€hold€that€a€jury€couldÐ ¸'#& Ðaccept€this€evidence€and€find€that€the€Appellant€did€not€have€the€intent€to€rob€the€Amoco€stationÐ ¤(ô#' Ðclerk€but€knowingly€furnished€substantial€assistance€in€the€commission€of€the€robbery.€Therefore,Ð )à$( Ðthe€trial€court€erred€by€not€charging€facilitation€of€attempted€aggravated€robbery.€Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àHaving€concluded€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€on€facilitation€ofÐ ° Ðattempted€aggravated€robbery,€our€final€inquiry€is€whether€that€error€is€harmless€beyond€a€reasonableÐ œì Ðdoubt.€€òòAllenóó,€69€S.W.3d€at€189€(citing€òòState€v.€Elyóó,€48€S.W.3d€710,€727€(Tenn.€2001)).€€AnÐ ˆØ Ðerroneous€failure€to€give€a€lesser„included€offense€instruction€will€result€in€reversal€unless€aÐ tÄ Ðreviewing€court€concludes€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€the€error€did€not€affect€the€outcome€of€theÐ `° Ðtrial.€€òòId.óó€€(citing€òòBowlesóó,€52€S.W.3d€at€77).€€The€error€may€be€harmless€when€the€jury,€by€finding€theÐ L œ ÐAppellant€guilty€of€the€highest€offense€to€the€exclusion€of€the€immediately€lesser€offense,€necessarilyÐ 8 ˆ Ðrejected€all€other€lesser„included€offenses.€€òòId.€(óócitinòòg€State€v.€Williamsóó,€977€S.W.2d€101,€106€(Tenn.Ð $ t Ð1998)).Ð  ` ÐÌà  àHowever,€we€conclude€that€facilitation€of€a€crime€involves€an€entirely€different€analysis.€Ð è 8  ÐòòState€v.€Daniel€Wade€Wilsonóó,€No.€E2000„01885„CCA„R3„CD€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€Aug.Ð Ô$  Ð2,€2001),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.€2002).€€Facilitation€addresses€the€Appellant's€role€as€aÐ À  Ðfacilitator€rather€than€a€principal€actor.€€òòId.óó€€The€Appellant's€theory€was€that€he€did€not€share€Stacker'sÐ ¬ü  Ðintent€to€rob€the€Amoco€station€but€that€he€provided€assistance€to€Stacker€by€fleeing€from€the€scene.Ð ˜è  ÐThe€intervening€lesser€offense,€attempted€robbery,€charged€by€the€trial€court€addressed€the€theory€thatÐ „Ô  Ðthe€Appellant€acted€as€a€principal.€€The€jury€was€not€permitted€to€give€consideration€to€a€legallyÐ pÀ Ðsufficient€theory€of€liability€proffered€by€the€Appellant€(òòi.e.,€óófacilitation).€€òòId.€€óóThe€issue€of€theÐ \¬ ÐAppellantððs€intent€was€contested.€€Evidence€that€the€Appellant€shared€the€intent€of€Stacker€wasÐ H˜ Ðcontroverted€and€not€overwhelming.€€In€light€of€the€controverted€evidence€of€the€Appellantððs€intent,Ð 4„ Ðwe€are€unable€to€conclude€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€the€jury,€if€given€the€opportunity,€wouldÐ  p Ðnot€have€convicted€the€Appellant€of€facilitation€of€attempted€aggravated€robbery.€€òòSee€Allen,€óó69Ð  \ ÐS.W.3d€at€191.€€We,€therefore,€reverse€the€Appellant's€conviction€for€attempted€aggravated€robberyÐ øH Ðand€remand€for€a€new€trial.Ð ä4 Ѐ¹Ó  Óò òCONCLUSION€ó óÐ ¼  ÐÌÓ0Óà  àWe€conclude,€from€our€review€of€the€evidence€under€the€required€analysis€of€òòBurnsóó,€that€theÐ ”ä Ðtrial€court€erred€in€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€on€the€lesser„included€offense€of€facilitation€ofÐ €Ð Ðattempted€aggravated€robbery.€€Accordingly,€we€reverse€the€judgment€of€conviction€and€remand€forÐ l¼ Ða€new€trial.Ð X ¨ йÓ˜HÓÔ#†Xk˜XX Xk˜q #ÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ô$D # Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE