WPCN 5D>E xuJ|. $֝:_{.^I²!pz onuwF56",91X=/pb 36h1`=ES~J4fR)-0X«iV8b O@N&y1wHcP@˔D<ޙ/7dT.+]CgDƷHoQ_Xݙw8 v$T 1{ pb {#,RjL8Qkd-&<;f ăWiyHrg]#YgIÛfx-]=R$TCzjHJԉΔ;?chdxPKPjN@ԓqa;k9tdѮjIT.i3 2IB4G|ŽTA6{288FB4NQ)# >UNI % 0(U:w443GU:V 0  0VU:U:L  U:2l U:U:fU:dU:3(mU: AQ  0D 0D* 0Dn B D/ B D3HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLl(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($,rAZ"Arial RegularEE1eӀn~<$(|3|x,rAZ"Arial Regular(v(2$ !  X XXXX jX X `   0  (A/$XXXX XXXX  0  ,cAZ"Arial Regular,cAZ"Arial Regular   $X XXXX X X `   2    ݀SincethepetitioninthiscasewasfiledafterMay10,1995,itisthereforegovernedbythe  provisionsofthe1995PostConvictionProcedureAct.SeeCompilersNotes,T.C.A.4030201(1997).   $X XXXX X X `   3    ݀Thepetitionwouldalsobebarredunderthepreviousthreeyearstatuteoflimitations.See  T.C.A.4030102(1990)(repealed);Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619(Tenn.Crim.App.),perm.to n app.denied,(Tenn.1994).   $XXXXXX X `   1    ݀Onappeal,thestatenotesthatpetitionerswhosesentenceshaveexpiredmaystillattacktheir  convictionsifthereisapossibilitythatanycollaterallegalconsequnceswillbeimposedonthebasisofthechallengedconvictions.Seee.g.Ellisonv.State,549S.W.2d691,694(Tenn.Crim.App.1976).The ,| petitionerinthiscasehasbeendeclaredahabitualcriminal.Regardless,thestatuteoflimitationsbarsthispetition.,cAZ"Arial Regular   $X XXXX X X `   1    ݀Onappeal,thestatenotesthatpetitionerswhosesentenceshaveexpiredmaystillattacktheir  convictionsifthereisapossibilitythatanycollaterallegalconsequenceswillbeimposedonthebasisofthechallengedconvictions.Seee.g.Ellisonv.State,549S.W.2d691,694(Tenn.Crim.App.1976).The ,| petitionerinthiscasehasbeendeclaredanhabitualcriminal.Regardless,thestatuteoflimitationsbarsthispetition.   $XXXXXX X `   1    ݀Onappeal,thestatenotesthatpetitionerswhosesentenceshaveexpiredmaystillattacktheir  convictionsifthereisapossibilitythatanycollaterallegalconsequnceswillbeimposedonthebasisofthechallengedconvictions.Seee.g.Ellisonv.State,549S.W.2d691,694(Tenn.Crim.App.1976).The ,| petitionerinthiscasehasbeendeclaredahabitualcriminal.Regardless,thestatuteoflimitationsbarsthispetition.,cAZ"Arial Regular   $XXXXXX X `   2    ݀SincethepetitioninthiscasewasfiledafterMay10,1995,itisthereforegovernedbythe  provisionsofthe1995PostConvictionProcedureAct.SeeCompilersNotes,T.C.A.4030201(1997).,cAZ"Arial Regular   $XXXXXX X `   3    ݀Thepetitionwouldalsobebarredunderthepreviousthreeyearstatuteoflimitations.See  T.C.A.4030102(1990)(repealed);Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619(Tenn.Crim.App.),perm.to n app.denied,(Tenn.1994).,cAZ"Arial Regular   $XXXXXX X `   1    ݀Onappeal,thestatenotesthatpetitionerswhosesentenceshaveexpiredmaystillattacktheir  convictionsifthereisapossibilitythatanycollaterallegalconsequenceswillbeimposedonthebasisofthechallengedconvictions.Seee.g.Ellisonv.State,549S.W.2d691,694(Tenn.Crim.App.1976).The ,| petitionerinthiscasehasbeendeclaredahabitualcriminal.Regardless,thestatuteoflimitationsbarsthispetition.,cAZ"Arial Regular  !"  XXXXXX   Ad FILEDXX   October15,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr.XXAppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular !"#%C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1   d''' dxdP Pd$$$$'dxd !    X XXXX TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7  XXdXXd7ќr(<,(j 8` `@E ` ttx$X r@ DINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE   @*D ATJACKSON    XXX X# XXXX#MARVINANTHONYMATTHEWS,   )  :   `     h     )  p  & v  ` Petitioner,   h     ) C.C.A.NO.02C019806CR00195   b t(>.*jx` `@E ` ttx$ tߛ `     h     )  p   N Ѐvs. `     h     )SHELBYCOUNTY  x   :   `     h     )  p   &   XXX XSTATEOFTENNESSEE# XXXXE#, h     ) No.P19924      `     h     )  p     ` Respondent.   h     )  p     `     h     @kk+D ORDER  8  `  ThismatterisbeforetheCourtuponthestatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtbyorderratherthanformalopinion.SeeRule20,Rulesof  theCourtofCriminalAppeals.Thiscaserepresentsanappealfromthedismissalofthepetitionerspetitionforpostconvictionrelief.Thepetitionerpledguiltytopetitlarcenyin1975andwassentencedtosixmonthsimprisonment.Noappealwastakenfromtheseconvictions.OnMay13,1998,thepetitionerfiledapetitionforpostconvictionattackingthevalidityofthisconvictionandsentence.Findingthatthepetitionerssentencehasexpired,thetrialcourtdeniedrelief.  /XXX X XXXX  1       p$#  `  PursuanttoT.C.A.4030202(a),FF  /XXX X XXXX  2      ,apersonincustodyunderasentence (X#' ofacourtofthisstatemustpetitionforpostconvictionreliefwithinoneyearofthedateofthefinalactionofthehigheststateappellatecourttowhichanappealistakenor,ifnoappealistaken,withinoneyearofthedateonwhichjudgmentbecamefinal.ThePostConvictionProcedureActprovidesseverallimitedexceptionstotheoneyearstatuteoflimitations,howevernoneofthemareapplicabletothepresentcase.See 1T,1 4030202(b).Thepetitioninthiscasewasfiledwellbeyondtheapplicablestatuteof 2 .39 limitations,andis,therefore,untimely.  /XXX X XXXX  3         `  Forthereasonsstatedabove,weconcludethatthetrialcourtdidnoterrindismissingthepetitionerspetitionforpostconvictionrelief.Accordingly,itisherebyORDEREDthatthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedinaccordancewithRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals. `     h     __________________________________ `     h     PAULG.SUMMERS,JUDGE `     h     __________________________________ `     h     DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE `     h     __________________________________ `     h     JOEG.RILEY,JUDGE