ÿWPC- Z¢áÝõÙVfn£Nd\|g‰l"]ôÊΊôň0*¥ \üž‰H È®I$”è¦2N$«7»åøv3\6æè¥Ã=~#YŠ~¬ã¯ç0|¢Ê®±N¾óÿÒوĺ§h)IªÌÁéç¾ÜºÜÞË8†ÒÏíW>þù©Ü¯@i•Œ+©ëÇ,…s¢:¼_*Í­”ãM6‘ùCÊ9ãÿ¾y1 Þº¡¼AMW¼¥þBÿiö¤ÓØ’ºˆqÜ¡×ËG’\Ž06¸§ßÜwnGÉrˆÊ”ì\_“G'©9Z Z#b+2 ®=©9½ñá&aé‘¡PôGãùø'xw+‹ú1-ÐùRÊ?ÚM=djúdlsÆÃÒOxÁ‹è‚Sk㉴U…ýs~ê;¢À‹4ɉ©cy;à¤èÕe¯D}ív& O=!LI…¤ ÑãÅæ`wÿ“ÐC0RĨ™•T«ëáA1jO4‘Y`uS_cp—4ï»·sg0Ql–ØU6PÙÈŽ}Órµ±ù5ï45iápD÷Mˆ»°FÅšQÔÆô‘ׇû#·/,ôSdÞÍñ~g,0_X`75ý…l…ònr‚ 28çk¢‰±¶ÒîÉ“â«b™×eabUN\ %ª 0ˆ°^ 8wD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ 0D‘ ÆÕ Æ› Æa Æ'U@íN--é/Eb"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 0ë**** B 0¤2 D3Ö D-  0K66 ASÆÔ 0¤š 0D> A«‚(ÈhH  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó̬œ) ÖJ~'ÿw®À Àbìà¡3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman  ßÝ ƒRñç$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôV5ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôV5òòôV5ÔThe€Appellant€was€also€indicted€under€the€alias,€Stephen€T.€Mayes. - ù-(|G2ñç$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€6á»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôV5ò»»Ô d(|3–w$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€6á»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3–w$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€6á»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€6á»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼6á»»»ÔÑ8€[=XXdæ»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îÂ6áÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼6á»îî #ԈРР ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àNovember€14,€2000€SessionÐ ð@ ÐÔ‡X[=X»¼6áÔÌò òÔ#†¼6á»XX[=#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€STEPHEN€T.€MAYS,€also€known€asÐ ä4 ЀSTEPHEN€T.€MAYESòòóóÔ‡X[=X»¼6áÔó óÐ ò B ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ æ 6 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€99„A„147€€€€€€Cheryl€Blackburn,€JudgeÐ Ì  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<}` AßÐ ~Î  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2000„00602„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€December€28,€2000Ð sà  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<>` AßÐ ?  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X[=XXX[=ÔThe€Appellant,€Stephen€T.€Mays,€pled€guilty€to€two€counts€of€theft€of€property€over€$10,000€andÐ 4„ Ðreceived€two€concurrent€five„year€sentences.€€Following€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€imposedÐ j Ðsplit€confinement€sentences€and€ordered€the€Appellant€to€serve€a€ninety„day€period€of€confinement.€Ð P ÐThe€court€also€ordered€restitution€with€scheduled€payments€over€a€ten„year€period.€€On€appeal,€theÐ æ6 ÐAppellant€argues€(1)€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€grant€the€Appellantððs€request€for€totalÐ Ì Ðprobation;€and€(2)€that€the€trial€court€improperly€established€restitution.€€After€review,€the€judgmentÐ ² Ðof€the€Davidson€County€Criminal€Court€is€affirmed.Ô#†X[=XXX[=Ú#ÔÔ#†¼6á»XX[=Ã#ÔÔ‡X[=X»¼6áÔÐ ˜è ÐÓÎÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed;€Remanded€to€CorrectÐ d´ ÐJudgment€Forms.ó óÐ Jš ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼6á»àX[=G#ÔÔ‡X[=X.¼6áÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJerry€L.€Smithóó€and€òòNormaÐ f ÐMcGee€Ogleóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð üL ÐÌNeal€Agee,€Jr.,€Lebanon,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Stephen€T.€Mays,€also€known€as€Stephen€T.Ð È ÐMayes.Ð ® þ  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter,€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General,€Marvin€E.Ð z"Ê" ÐClements,€Jr.,€Assistant€Attorney€General,€Victor€S.€(Torry)€Johnson,€III,€District€Attorney€General,Ð `#°# Ðand€Bret€Gunn,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð F$–$ ÐÔ#†¼6á»XX[=N #ÔÔ‡X[=X»¼6áÔÓ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼6á»XX[=$ #ÔÔ‡X[=X»¼6áÔÐ &b!& ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼6á»XX[=– #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X[=X»¼6áÔÔ‡X[=XXX[=Ôà  àThe€Appellant,€Stephen€T.€Mays,׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô#†X[=XXX[= #ÔÔ‡X[=XXX[=Ô€was€indicted€by€a€Davidson€County€Grand€Jury€on€oneÐ Þ'.#( Ðcount€of€theft€of€property€over€$60,000€and€on€three€counts€of€theft€of€property€between€$10,000€andÐ Ä($) Ð$60,000.€€On€October€28,€1999,€the€Appellant€pled€guilty,€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender,€to€twoÐ ª)ú$* Ðcounts€of€theft€of€property€between€$10,000€and€$60,000,€class€C€felonies.€€€Under€the€terms€of€theÐ *à%+ Ðplea€agreement,€the€Appellant€was€sentenced€to€five€years€on€each€count,€with€the€counts€to€runÐ v+Æ&,ý Ðconcurrently.€€The€issues€of€the€manner€of€service€of€the€sentences€and€restitution€were€submittedÐ ° Ðto€the€trial€court€for€its€determination.€€Following€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€ordered€theÐ –æ Ðsentences€be€suspended€after€service€of€ninety€days€incarceration.€€Additionally,€the€AppellantÐ |Ì Ðreceived€ten€years€probation€and€was€ordered€to€pay€$300€per€month€in€restitution€during€the€ten„Ð b² Ðyear€period.€€On€appeal,€the€Appellant€raises€the€following€issues€for€our€review:€(1)€whether€theÐ H˜ ÐAppellant€was€entitled€to€total€probation;€and€(2)€whether€the€trial€court€properly€establishedÐ . ~ Ðrestitution.€€After€reviewing€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment.Ð  d Ðò òÓ  ÓÌÌBackgroundÐ Æ   Ðó óÓ  ÓÌà  àIn€November€of€1996,€Bruce€Hardwood€Floors€in€Nashville€discovered€that€$164,000€worthÐ ’â  Ðof€inventory€was€missing.€An€investigation€followed€which€eventually€ended€without€arrests.€Ð xÈ  ÐApproximately€one€year€later,€an€additional€$31,000€of€inventory€was€discovered€missing€and€anÐ ^®  Ðinvestigation€was€again€conducted.€€Facts€developed€during€the€second€investigation€traced€theÐ D”  Ðmissing€materials€to€the€Appellant.€€The€Appellant€confessed€to€stealing€approximately€$74,523Ð *z  Ðworth€of€property€during€the€two„year€span.Ð ` ÐÌà  àDuring€this€period,€the€Appellant€was€an€employee€of€Yellow€Freight,€which€was€a€commonÐ Ü, Ðcarrier€for€Bruce€Hardwood€Floors.€€The€Appellantððs€co„defendant,€Curtis€Foster,€was€the€leadÐ Â Ðperson€in€the€shipping€department€at€Bruce.€€The€Appellant€was€a€truck€driver€for€Yellow€Freight.€Ð ¨ø ÐFoster€would€sell€materials€to€the€Appellant,€who€would€then€resell€the€materials€to€variousÐ ŽÞ Ðpurchasers,€including€building€contractors,€or€use€them€himself.€€A€search€of€the€AppellantððsÐ tÄ Ðgrandmotherððs€house€revealed€a€Yellow€Freight€trailer€which€contained€approximately€$17,973Ð Zª Ðworth€of€materials€stolen€from€Bruce€Hardwood€Floors.€€The€trailer€itself€had€also€been€missing€forÐ @ Ðthree€months€and€contained€various€other€missing€items€belonging€to€Yellow€Freight.€€The€AppellantÐ &v Ðtestified€that€he€was€building€his€house€with€some€of€the€stolen€materials€and€using€the€trailer€as€aÐ  \ Ðplace€for€storage.€€When€asked€by€the€trial€court€why€he€was€building€a€home€and€outfitting€it€withÐ òB Ðstolen€property,€the€Appellant€replied,€ð ðI€didnððt€know€any€better.ðð€Ð Ø( ÐÌò òÓ  ÓI.€€SentencingÐ ¤ô ÐÌó óÓ  Óà  àThe€Appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€him€total€probation.€€The€AppellantÐ p!À  Ðcontends€that€ð ðthe€trial€courtððs€decision€was€not€made€considering€the€sentencing€principles€and€allÐ V"¦! Ðof€the€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ððÐ <#Œ" ÐÌà  àThe€Appellant€bears€the€burden€of€establishing€that€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€courtÐ %X $ Ðwas€erroneous.€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€168€(Tenn.€1991);€òòState€v.€Boggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€467,Ð î%>!% Ð473€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996);€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€786€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð Ô&$"& ÐAppellate€review€of€a€sentence€is€òòde€novoóó,€with€a€presumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€theÐ º' #' Ðcourt€from€which€the€appeal€is€taken€are€correct.€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðð€40„35„401(d);€òòAshbyóó,€823Ð  (ð#( ÐS.W.2d€at€169.€€In€determining€whether€the€Appellant€has€carried€the€burden,€this€court€mustÐ †)Ö$) Ðconsider€the€evidence€received€at€the€trial€and€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€presentence€report,€theÐ l*¼%* Ðâ âprinciples€of€sentencing,€the€arguments€of€counsel,€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€offenses,Ð R+¢&+ Ðexisting€mitigating€and€enhancing€factors,€statements€made€by€the€offender,€and€the€potential€forÐ ° Ðrehabilitation.€€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169òòóó;òò€Tenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðð€40„35„210.€€Ð –æ Ðâ âÌà  àAt€the€time€of€his€arrest,€the€Appellant€was€thirty„two„years„old,€a€high€school€graduate,€andÐ b² Ðhad€no€prior€criminal€convictions.€€Because€the€Appellant€was€convicted€of€a€class€C€felony,€he€isÐ H˜ Ðentitled€to€the€presumption€that€he€is€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing.€€òòSeeóó€òòTenn.Ð . ~ ÐCode€Ann.óó€ðð€40„35„102(6).€€Accordingly,€the€trial€court€imposed€a€sentence€of€split€confinement,Ð  d Ðwhich€is€listed€as€a€sentencing€alternative€in€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðð€40„35„104(4).€€Therefore,€the€trialÐ ú J Ðcourt€properly€applied€the€statutory€presumption€under€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðð€40„35„102(6).Ð à 0 ÐÌà  àThe€Appellant,€in€effect,€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€not€sentencing€him€to€totalÐ ¬ ü  Ðprobation.€€ð ðThe€determination€of€whether€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€an€alternative€sentence€andÐ ’â  Ðwhether€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€full€probation€are€different€inquires.ðð€€òòBoggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€at€€477.€Ð xÈ  ÐWhere€a€defendant€is€entitled€to€the€statutory€presumption€of€alternative€sentencing,€the€State€hasÐ ^®  Ðthe€burden€of€overcoming€the€presumption€with€evidence€to€the€contrary.€€òòState€v.€Binghamóó,€910Ð D”  ÐS.W.2d€448,€455€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€ð ðConversely,€the€defendant€has€the€burden€ofÐ *z  Ðestablishing€[his]€suitability€for€total€probation,€even€if€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€the€statutoryÐ ` Ðpresumption€of€alternative€sentencing.ðð€òòId.óó;€òòsee€alsoóó€€òòBoggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€at€477.€€To€meet€the€burdenÐ öF Ðof€establishing€suitability€for€total€probation,€the€defendant€must€demonstrate€that€probation€willÐ Ü, Ðð ðsubserve€the€ends€of€justice€and€the€best€interest€of€both€the€public€and€the€defendant.ðð€òòId.óó€at€456.Ð Â ÐÌà  àIn€the€present€case,€the€trial€court€found€that€the€Appellant€was€entitled€to€split€confinementÐ ŽÞ Ðand€reasoned€in€part€as€follows:Ð tÄ ÐÌà8  àAll€right,€with€regard€to€Mr.€Mays,€Mr.€Mays,€you€really€donððt€quite€appreciate€theÐ @ Ðsituation€you€are€in€is€my€opinion.€€You€show€very€little€remorse,€and€basically€haveÐ &v Ðno€good€excuse€for€what€you€did,€so€this€is€my€decision€having€weighed€all€theseÐ  \ Ðfactors,€listened€to€you,€looked€at€the€Pre„Sentence€Report,€your€attitude,€is€that€itÐ òB Ðwould€be€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€this€offense,€which€were€extensive€andÐ Ø( Ðreally€quite€difficult€for€the€business,€even€though€they€are€pretty€large€businesses€inÐ ¾ Ðterms€of€other€employees€and€all€of€that,€that€you€are€going€to€serve€90€days,€day€forÐ ¤ô Ðday€at€a€hundred€percent,€and€then€you€are€going€to€be€on€probation€for€ten€years€onÐ Š Ú Ðeach€count€.€.€.€Ðp!À Ð Ð  ÐÌThus,€the€trial€court€found€that€a€sentence€of€split€confinement€would€avoid€depreciating€theÐ <#Œ" Ðseriousness€of€the€offense€and€ordered€the€Appellant€serve€ninety€days€of€his€five„year€sentence.€€òòSeeÐ "$r# ÐóóòòTenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðððð€40„35„210(b)(4),€„103(5),€„103(1)(B);€òòsee€also€óóòòBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€456.€Ð %X $ ÐÌà  àIn€the€present€case,€the€Appellant€used€his€position€with€Yellow€Freight€in€order€to€steal€fromÐ Ô&$"& ÐBruce€Hardwood€Floors.€òòóó€The€Appellant€himself€admitted€to€stealing€$74,523€worth€of€materialsÐ º' #' Ðfrom€Bruce€over€a€two„year€period.€€He€also€admitted€to€stealing€items€from€Yellow€Freight€andÐ  (ð#( Ðtestified€that€he€used€a€Yellow€Freight€trailer€as€a€place€to€store€the€materials€stolen€from€BruceÐ †)Ö$) ÐHardwood€Floors.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€remarked€that€the€Appellant€had€shownÐ l*¼%* Ðno€remorse€and€noted€its€astonishment€at€the€magnitude€of€the€thefts€committed€for€no€apparentÐ R+¢&+ Ðreason€other€than€greed.€€The€trial€court€further€noted€the€seriousness€of€the€offense€which€involvedÐ 8,ˆ', Ðthe€disappearance€of€approximately€$200,000€worth€of€inventory€during€a€two„year€span.€€A€reviewÐ ° Ðof€the€record,€along€with€the€circumstances€of€the€offense,€the€protracted€period€of€the€thefts,€andÐ –æ Ðlack€of€remorse€by€the€Appellant,€convinces€us€that€the€Appellant€has€failed€to€establish€that€hisÐ |Ì Ðsentence€was€improper.€€€Thus,€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€finding€that€total€probation€wouldÐ b² Ðdepreciate€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.€€òòSee€óóòòBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€456€(citing€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,Ð H˜ Ð805€S.W.2d€785,€788„89€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991));€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894€S.W.2d€€301,€306€(Tenn.Ð . ~ ÐCrim.€App.€1994).Ð  d ÐÌò òÓ  ÓII.€€RestitutionÐ à 0 ÐÌó óÓ  Óà  àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€ordered€the€Appellant€to€payÐ ¬ ü  Ðrestitution€of€$300€per€month€for€the€duration€of€the€ten„year€term€of€probation,€representing€a€totalÐ ’â  Ðpayment€of€$36,000.€€The€judgment€forms,€however,€reflect€that€the€trial€court€ordered€totalÐ xÈ  Ðrestitution€of€$57,550.€On€appeal,€the€Appellant€argues€that€the€trial€courtððs€order€regardingÐ ^®  Ðrestitution€is€contradictory€and€ð ðshould€be€altered€to€require€[the€Appellant]€to€pay€not€more€than€theÐ D”  Ðtotal€sum€of€$36,000€at€$300€per€month.ððÐ *z  Ѐ€Ð ` Ðà  àDuring€sentencing,€the€trial€court€determined€that€the€actual€amount€of€restitution€theÐ öF ÐAppellant€owed€Bruce€Hardwood€Floors€was€$56,550€and€the€actual€amount€of€restitution€he€owedÐ Ü, ÐYellow€Freight€was€$1000.€€The€$56,550€represented€the€amount€the€Appellant€admitted€to€stealingÐ Â Ðless€the€value€of€the€property€eventually€recovered.€€The€trial€court,€after€considering€the€AppellantððsÐ ¨ø Ðpresent€and€future€ability€to€pay,€ordered€the€Appellant€to€repay€$300€per€month€for€ten€years,€forÐ ŽÞ Ða€total€of€$36,000.€€In€so€doing,€the€trial€court€recognized€and€stated€thatÐ tÄ ÐÌà8  àBruce€Hardwood€is€out€a€whole€lot€more€money,€but€I€have€to€be€realistic€in€termsÐ @ Ðof€[the€Appellantððs]€ability€to€pay€...€the€statute€also€says€in€terms€of€restitution€thatÐ &v ÐI€have€to€consider€the€ability,€the€future€ability€of€the€defendant€to€pay€and€theirÐ  \ Ðfinancial€resources,€so€even€though€I€might€find€that€the€inventory€amount€is€theÐ òB Ðcorrect€amount,€I€have€to€then€go€further€and€determine€whether€or€not€the€defendantsÐ Ø( Ðhave€the€ability€to€pay,€either€now€or€in€the€future.оРР ÐÌà  àThe€statute€governing€restitution€provides€that€a€sentencing€court€may€direct€a€defendant€toÐ Š Ú Ðmake€restitution€to€the€victim€of€an€offense€as€a€condition€of€probation.€€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.€ððóó€40„35„Ð p!À  Ð304(a)(1997).€€In€determining€the€amount€of€restitution€owed,€the€trial€court€must€consider€theÐ V"¦! Ðfinancial€resources€and€future€ability€of€the€defendant€to€pay€or€perform.€€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.€ððóó€40„35„Ð <#Œ" Ð304(d).€€Furthermore,€ð ðthe€court€may€not€establish€a€payment€or€performance€schedule€extendingÐ "$r# Ðbeyond€the€statutory€maximum€term€of€probation€supervision€that€could€have€been€imposed€for€theÐ %X $ Ðoffense.ðð€€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.€ððóó€40„35„304(c).€€Ð î%>!% ÐÌà  àWe€conclude€from€the€record€of€the€sentencing€hearing€that€the€intent€of€the€court€was€toÐ º' #' Ðestablish€restitution€at€$36,000€due€to€the€Appellantððs€inability€to€pay€the€full€$57,550.€€Therefore,Ð  (ð#( Ðwe€remand€to€the€trial€court€for€a€corrected€entry€of€restitution€in€the€amount€of€$36,000.Ð †)Ö$) ÐÌò òÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONÐ R+¢&+ ÐÐ 8,ˆ', ÐÓ  Óà  àó óWe€find€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€denying€the€Appellant€total€probation€due€to€theÐ ° Ðseriousness€of€the€offense€and€affirm€the€judgment.€€Consistent€with€this€opinion,€however,€weÐ –æ Ðremand€for€correction€of€the€judgment€forms€to€reflect€total€restitution€owed€in€the€amount€ofÐ |Ì Ð$36,000.Ð b² ÐÔ#†X[=XXX[=ß #ÔÌÌÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ¬ ü  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE