ÿWPCè  Ñ]½Õß/ƦÀ ‚ ˜aô ÿ§ª¯ÊßÕ/Ħ&tn¿>®ÕÎð.€ñ­öRBî9ûrn°BáÛ⇢Î`ZïY§½oCØÈÉ„uv«iO)x|ü$ÞîÑFõ´ lu­b‰+ÿcv­Ä˜ôvV³,ð>v)âzT=³%ií6lìësÖÉüŠÉ>ÜD\@‘3Óž¬P3¤s'Í?7âÞ,ùÆ`+Ķ?¢ùæƒ7x¨>GA#ÈûM!p(c?ð¯Yu´æÿ N»Œñ ªN/®(æˆýV?6Ýûa˜ND¸g˜T-]žòê£Zuª!}5éUdg¶ÖœYkÀ¶ï~´•|bë;§`1ñW¨šQÛÐç k±ÃI˜ S=ŠŒl–ðer k@yÕ#ñ©ce°¯Ų…´a…ÞôЋ–[˜X&ÔõA©8¤Eœ†Vz€*Ú®à»~¶O#„v… Љ¯GÉr³[´…gCÜ®Å6ëbçý™T=Óí³k‚RþgØTP«u®25ÚÖúÀW' KâÛꙜ4ó§¡½±æm‹XÎI A›Æ‚9°ÝºÌx¯-ã@®8,„“I;¬h-Íý†ºÎ{!ά·Ù¨½ ƒí¹?áÞJ½ÇßJ1ö—O‚ŸÈW#ÉÂU N‹ %Ù 0:ß ß ^  w% 4) = L mN "e b‡ : EÉ É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É BË ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6ÒV,,,,ÒV0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,Ô!Œ;1Ï h_B0ê:i¢×+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Timberlake- ù- 0Ñ#€ÿÿXÿÿd#ÑÑ € Ñ dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡îß§îXXÔÑ  Ñà@hhìàÑ€Ö¼ÑIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@gg$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†X~öXîîß§=#ÔÔ‡»#»XX~öԈРÓ# Ðà@ßß ìàMay€11,€2004€SessionˆÐ öF ÐÔ#†X~öX»»##ÔÔ‡»#»XX~öÔÌà@ÌÌìàò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€JIMMY€M.€Ô_ÔMcCRARYÔ_Ô,€JR.ó óˆÐ  f ÐÌÔ#†X~öX»»#£#Ôà@¸ ¸ ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Rutherford€CountyˆÐ 7 ‡ Ðà@r r ìàNos.€F53183A,€F53594A,€F53916,€&€F54156€€€€€€Don€Ash,€JudgeˆÐ ! q ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Þ` A߈Ð ß/  ÐÌà@. . ìàNo.€M2003„02087„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€23,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ԈРØ(  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<Á` Aßó óÐ Â  ÐÌÓ  ÓDefendant,€Jimmy€M.€Ô_ÔMcCraryÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€pled€guilty€to€the€following€charges€without€a€recommendationÐ º  Ðfrom€the€State€as€to€sentencing:€€two€counts€of€sale€of€.5€grams€or€more€of€cocaine€in€Case€No.Ð £ó  ÐF53183A;€one€count€of€possession€of€.5€grams€or€more€of€cocaine€with€the€intent€to€sell€in€Case€No.Ð ŒÜ ÐF53594A;€one€count€of€sale€of€.5€grams€or€more€of€cocaine€in€Case€No.€F53916.€€Defendant€alsoÐ uÅ Ðwaived€the€presentment€of€€Case€No.€F54156€to€the€Rutherford€County€grand€jury€and€pled€guiltyÐ ^® Ðto€one€count€of€sale€of€.5€grams€or€more€of€cocaine€upon€a€criminal€information.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€CodeÐ G— ÐAnn.€ðð€40„3„103.€€Each€of€the€charged€offenses€is€a€Class€B€felony.€€As€part€of€the€plea€agreement,Ð 0€ Ðthe€State€agreed€to€the€dismissal€of€count€two€of€Case€No.€F53916€and€count€three€of€Case€No.Ð i ÐF53183A.€€Following€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€sentenced€Defendant€to€an€effectiveÐ R Ðsentence€of€twenty„eight€years€as€a€Range€I,€standard€offender.€Defendant€now€appeals€the€lengthÐ ë; Ðof€his€sentences€in€Case€Nos.€F53183A€and€F54156,€and€the€trial€courtððs€order€that€his€sentence€inÐ Ô$ ÐCase€No.€F54156€run€consecutively€to€his€sentences€in€Case€No.€F53183A.€€Defendant€does€notÐ ½  Ðappeal€the€trial€courtððs€order€that€his€sentences€in€Case€Nos.€F53183A€and€F54156€run€consecutivelyÐ ¦ö Ðto€his€sentences€in€Case€Nos.€F53594€and€F53916.€€After€a€careful€review€of€the€record€in€thisÐ ß Ðmatter,€we€€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€order€that€Defendantððs€sentence€in€Case€No.€F54156€runÐ xÈ Ðconsecutively€with€his€sentences€in€Case€No.€F53183A.€€We€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€judgment€asÐ a± Ðto€sentencing€in€Case€Nos.€F53183A€and€F54156,€and€remand€for€a€new€sentencing€hearing€as€toÐ J š Ðthe€length€of€the€sentences€in€these€cases.€€In€all€other€aspects,€the€trial€courtððs€judgments€areÐ 3!ƒ  Ðaffirmed.Ð "l! ÐÌà@ ìàò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgments€of€theˆÐ î#># Ðà@ÄÄìàRutherford€County€Circuit€Court€Affirmed€in€Part€and€Reversed€in€Partó óˆÐ Ø$( $ ÐÌòòThomas€T.€Woodall,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayesóó€and€òòJohnÐ «&û!& ÐEverett€Williams,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ”'ä"' ÐÌMatthew€Mayo,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€(on€appeal)€and€William€Ô_ÔKennerlyÔ_Ô€Burger,€Murfreesboro,Ð f)¶$) ÐTennessee,€(at€trial)€for€the€appellant,€Jimmy€M.€Ô_ÔMcCraryÔ_Ô,€Jr.Ð O*Ÿ%* ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Helena€Walton€Yarbrough,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ !,q', ÐGeneral;€William€C.€Ô_ÔWhitesellÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€J.€Paul€Newman,€AssistantÐ  -Z(- ÐDistrict€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ó-C). ÐÑÖ¼Ñâ âÑ8€~öXXdédÈ8ÑÑ€ Ñâ âÑ  ÑÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ ™é ÐÌà  àThe€State€submitted€the€following€factual€basis€in€support€of€Defendantððs€convictions€at€theÐ l¼ Ðguilty€plea€submission€hearing.€€For€Case€No.€F53916,€Defendant€sold€more€than€.5€gram€of€cocaineÐ U¥ Ðto€a€confidential€informant€in€an€electronically€monitored€sale€on€March€12,€2002.€€Regarding€CaseÐ > Ž ÐNo.€F5359A,€deputies€from€the€Rutherford€County€Sheriffððs€Department,€responding€to€activeÐ ' w Ðwarrants€on€Defendant€and€Jamie€Timberlake€on€August€30,€2002,€discovered€a€plastic€bag€withÐ  ` Ðwhite€powder€believed€to€be€cocaine€and€a€bottle€of€pills€believed€to€be€Valium€within€DefendantððsÐ ù I Ðreach€during€a€consensual€search.€€Defendant€was€charged€with€felony€possession€and€placed€underÐ â 2  Ðarrestò ò.€€ó óDefendant€was€released€later€that€day€after€posting€bond.€€For€Case€No.€F53183A,€Defendant,Ð Ë   Ðwhile€on€bail,€sold€more€than€.5€grams€of€cocaine€on€October€9,€October€18€and€October€22,€2002Ð ·  Ðto€a€confidential€informant€during€electronically€monitored€sales.€€For€Case€No.€F54156,€John€Jones,Ð  ð  Ða€narcotics€detective€with€the€Murfreesboro€Police€Department,€executed€a€search€warrant€onÐ ‰Ù  ÐOctober€25,€2002,€during€which€a€plastic€bag€of€cocaine€was€found€in€Defendantððs€pocket.Ð r  ÐÌà  àDetective€Jones€testified€at€Defendantððs€sentencing€hearing€that€Defendant€was€previouslyÐ D” Ðarrested€for€the€sale€of€narcotics€in€Case€Nos.€F53916€and€F53594A€and€was€on€bail€when€heÐ -} Ðcommitted€the€offenses€in€Case€Nos.€F54156€and€F53183A.€€Detective€Jones€said€that€he€alsoÐ f Ðreceived€information€that€Defendant€continued€to€sell€drugs€after€Detective€Jonesðð€initialÐ ÿO Ðinvestigation€was€concluded.Ð è8 ÐÌà  àOn€cross„examination,€Detective€Jones€said€that€he€was€aware€that€Defendantððs€partner€inÐ º  Ðsome€of€the€charged€offenses,€Jamie€Timberlake,€also€was€convicted€of€drug€offenses€that€wereÐ £ó Ðcommitted€while€he€was€on€bail€for€earlier€drug€related€charges.€€Detective€Jones€said€that€he€wasÐ ŒÜ Ðaware€that€Mr.€Timberlake€received€concurrent€six„year€sentences€as€a€result€of€his€plea€agreementÐ uÅ Ðwith€the€State.€€Detective€Jones€said€that€his€investigation€focused€on€Defendant€because€he€wasÐ ^® Ðknown€as€a€major€ð ðdrug€playerðð€in€the€area.€€He€agreed€that€Mr.€Timberlake€had€ð ða€lot€of€[drug]Ð G— Ðconvictionsðð€compared€to€Defendant.€€Detective€Jones€said€that€he€did€not€participate€in€the€pleaÐ 0€ Ðagreement€entered€into€between€the€State€and€Mr.€Timberlake.Ð i ÐÌà  àOn€redirect,€Detective€Jones€said€that€Mr.€Timberlake€had€agreed€to€testify€against€DefendantÐ ë ; Ðas€part€of€his€plea€agreement€should€the€cases€proceed€to€trial.€€Detective€Jones€reiterated€thatÐ Ô!$  ÐDefendantððs€name€was€the€one€that€came€up€during€his€investigation,€and€Defendant€was€the€oneÐ ½" ! Ðwho€handed€the€buyer€the€drugs€and€took€the€buyerððs€money.€€Detective€Jones€said€that€the€drugÐ ¦#ö" Ðproblem€in€the€community€was€increasing€to€the€extent€that€twelve„€and€thirteen„year„old€childrenÐ $ß# Ðwere€selling€drugs.Ð x%È $ ÐÌà  àDefendant€testified€that€he€completed€the€twelfth€grade€at€Ô_ÔBellwoodÔ_Ô€Christian€Academy.€Ð J'š"& ÐBecause€the€schoolððs€curriculum€did€not€conform€to€state€standards,€Defendant€was€required€to€takeÐ 3(ƒ#' Ðthe€GED€to€proceed€further€with€his€education.€€Defendant€said€that€he€did€not€pass€his€GED€but€wasÐ )l$( Ðsteadily€employed€after€that€until€he€was€injured€on€the€job€in€October,€2000.€€Defendant€sufferedÐ *U%) Ða€deterioration€of€the€necrotic€bones€in€his€hand€as€a€result€of€the€injury€which€Defendant€said€wasÐ î*>&* Ða€very€painful€condition.€€Defendant€had€five€surgeries€on€his€hand€and€was€currently€taking€Ô_ÔlortabÔ_Ô,Ð ×+''+ ÐÔ_ÔoxycontinÔ_Ô€and€Ô_ÔtrazadoneÔ_Ô.€€Defendant€said€that€he€has€also€taken€Ô_ÔpercocetÔ_Ô€and€Ô_ÔmeperganÔ_Ô€in€the€past.€Ð ° ÐDefendant€said€that€he€was€not€able€to€work€because€of€his€injured€hands€and€lived€with€his€parents.€Ð ™é ÐDefendant€said€that€he€did€not€own€a€car.Ð ‚Ò ÐÌà  àDefendant€stated€that€he€began€using€cocaine€when€the€medications€prescribed€by€his€doctorÐ T¤ Ðno€longer€helped€alleviate€the€pain€from€his€hand€injury.€€At€first,€Mr.€Timberlake€supplied€him€withÐ =  Ðcocaine€at€no€charge.€€When€his€need€for€the€drug€increased,€however,€Defendant€began€sellingÐ & v Ðcocaine€to€support€his€habit.€€All€the€money€he€received€from€his€sales€activities€was€used€toÐ  _ Ðpurchase€more€cocaine.€€Defendant€said€that€he€continued€to€use€and€sell€cocaine€while€on€bondÐ ø H Ðbecause€of€his€addiction.€€Defendant€admitted€that€this€was€a€bad€decision.€€On€cross„examination,Ð á 1  ÐDefendant€conceded€that€although€Mr.€Timberlake€got€Defendant€more€involved€with€drugs,€hisÐ Ê   Ðdrug„related€activities€were€not€Mr.€Timberlakeððs€fault.€€Other€than€the€charged€offenses,€DefendantÐ ³  Ðsaid€that€he€had€sold€drugs€more€than€ten€times.Ð œì  ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€sentenced€Defendant€to€eight€years€for€the€conviction€in€Case€€No.€F53916Ð n¾  Ðand€eight€years€for€the€conviction€in€Case€€No.€53594A.€€The€trial€court€ordered€the€sentences€inÐ W§  ÐCase€No.€F53594A€and€Case€No.€F53916€to€run€concurrently.€€Without€identifying€whichÐ @ Ðenhancement€factors€it€relied€upon,€the€trial€court€sentenced€Defendant€to€ten€years€for€count€oneÐ )y Ðand€ten€years€for€count€two€in€Case€€No€F53183A.€The€trial€court€ordered€the€sentence€in€count€oneÐ b Ðto€run€concurrently€to€the€sentence€in€count€two€and€consecutively€to€the€sentences€in€Case€Nos.Ð ûK ÐF53916,€F53594A€and€F54156.€€The€trial€court€ordered€the€sentence€in€count€two€to€runÐ ä4 Ðconsecutively€to€the€sentences€in€Case€Nos.€F53916€and€F53594A.€€The€trial€court€sentencedÐ Í ÐDefendant€to€ten€years€for€the€conviction€in€Case€No.€F54156€and€ordered€the€sentence€to€runÐ ¶ Ðconsecutively€to€counts€one€and€two€in€Case€No.€F3183A€and€the€sentences€in€Case€Nos.€F53594AÐ Ÿï Ðand€F53916€for€an€effective€sentence€of€twenty„eight€years.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àDefendant€agrees€that€the€trial€court€was€required€to€order€the€sentences€for€the€offensesÐ Zª Ðcommitted€while€on€bail,€Case€Nos.€F53183A€and€F54156,€to€run€consecutively€to€the€sentences€inÐ C“ ÐCase€€Nos.€F53916€and€F53594A€pursuant€to€Rule€32(c)(3)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€CriminalÐ ,| ÐProcedure.€€Defendant€argues,€however,€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€Defendant€above€theÐ e Ðminimum€sentence€applicable€in€Case€Nos.€F54156€and€F53183A€and€ordering€the€sentence€in€CaseÐ þN ÐNo.€F54156€to€run€consecutively€to€the€sentences€imposed€in€Case€€No.€F53183A.Ð ç 7 ÐÌà  àWhen€a€defendant€challenges€the€length€or€the€manner€of€service€of€his€or€her€sentence,€thisÐ ¹" ! ÐCourt€must€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€a€presumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trialÐ ¢#ò" Ðcourt€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d);€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔImfeldÔ_Ôóó,€70€S.W.3d€698,€704€(Tenn.Ð ‹$Û# Ð2002).€€This€presumption,€however,€is€contingent€upon€an€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€theÐ t%Ä $ Ðtrial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€òòState€v.Ð ]&­!% ÐÔ_ÔPettusÔ_Ôóó,€986€S.W.2d€540,€543„44€(Tenn.€1999).€€If€the€record€fails€to€show€such€consideration,€theÐ F'–"& Ðreview€of€the€sentence€is€purely€òòde€novoóó.€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔSheltonÔ_Ôóó,€854€S.W.2d€116,€123€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð /(#' Ð1992).€€The€defendant€bears€the€burden€of€showing€that€his€sentence€is€improper.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð )h$( Ððð€40„35„401(d)€Sentencing€Commission€Comments;€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔAshbyÔ_Ôóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð *Q%) Ð1991).Ð ê*:&* ÐÐ Ó+#'+ Ðà  àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€stated:Ð ° ÐÌà8  àà ` àSo,€in€regard€to€the€first€two€charges,€I€think€are€felony€number,€535916,€andÐ ‚Ò Ðfelony€number,€53594A,€Iððm€going€to€sentence€you€to€eight€years€on€each€one€ofÐ k» Ðthose.€€And€Iððll€run€those€two€sentences€concurrently.€€Thatððs€the€minimum.€€IððmÐ T¤ Ðgoing€to€assess€a€$2,000€fine€on€each€one€of€those€cases.Ð= Ð Ð  ÐÌà0  àà ` àThen€we€have€three€other€counts.€€And€these€were€the€sales€that€took€place€while€youÐ  _ Ðwere€out€on€bond€and€by€law€theyððve€got€to€run€consecutively€with€each€other.€€And€lookingÐ ø H Ðat€the€enhancement€factors,€Iððm€going€to€find€that€a€ten€year€sentence€is€appropriate€on€eachÐ á 1  Ðone€of€those€sentences.€€And€Iððve€got€three€different€counts€on€those.€€And€the€question€isÐ Ê   Ðwhether€I€should€run€those€three€counts€concurrently€with€each€other€or€run€thoseÐ ³  Ðconsecutive.€€If€I€run€those€consecutive,€sir,€then€youððd€be€looking€at€38€years€in€the€stateÐ œì  Ðpenitentiary.€€And€I€donððt€know€what€I€am€going€to€do.€€Iððll€let€you€take€a€drug€screen€andÐ …Õ  ÐIððll€come€back€and€make€my€decision.Ðn¾ (#(# ÐÌà  àDefendant€was€administered€a€drug€screen€test€and€tested€positive€for€cocaine,€morphine,€andÐ @ Ðmarijuana.€€After€the€test€results€were€known,€the€trial€court€stated:Ð )y ÐÌà8  àà ` à.€.€.€I€went€through€these€various€things€in€regard€to€rehabilitation€and€whetherÐ ûK Ðor€not€you€were€going€to€be€able€to€practice€good€citizenship€and€all€those€otherÐ ä4 Ðthings.€€And€taking€all€that€into€consideration,€your€first€two€eight€year€sentences,Ð Í ÐIððm€going€to€run€concurrently.€€The€next€three€sentences,€each€one€of€those€are€goingÐ ¶ Ðto€be€ten€years.€€Two€of€those€are€going€to€run€consecutively€and€the€other€one€willÐ Ÿï Ðrun€concurrently.€€That€means€it€will€be€a€total€of€28€years€in€the€state€penitentiary,Ð ˆØ Ðas€a€range€one,€30€percent€offender.€€Iððm€going€to€assess€a€fine€of€$2,000,€on€eachÐ qÁ Ðone€of€those€cases.€€Do€you€understand€that,€sir?ÐZªÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àDefendant€was€convicted€of€five€Class€B€felonies€as€a€Range€I€offender.€€The€presumptiveÐ ,| Ðsentence€is€the€minimum€sentence€within€the€range,€or€eight€years,€if€there€are€no€enhancement€orÐ e Ðmitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„112(a)(2)€and€„210(c).€€If€there€are€enhancing€factorsÐ þN Ðpresent€but€no€mitigating€factors,€the€trial€court€may€set€the€sentence€above€the€minimum€sentenceÐ ç 7 Ðbut€still€within€that€sentencing€range.€€òòId.óó€„210(d).Ð Ð!   ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€did€not€state€which€enhancement€factors€it€was€relying€upon€to€elevateÐ ¢#ò" ÐDefendantððs€sentences€in€Case.€Nos.€F53183A€and€F54156€from€eight€years€to€ten€years.€€òòSee€óóTenn.Ð ‹$Û# ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(f).€€ð ðTo€facilitate€meaningful€appellate€review,€the€[Sentencing]€ActÐ t%Ä $ Ðprovides€that€the€trial€court€must€place€on€the€record€its€reasons€for€arriving€at€the€final€sentencingÐ ]&­!% Ðdecision,€òòidentify€the€mitigating€and€enhancement€factors€foundóó,€òòstate€the€specific€facts€supportingÐ F'–"& Ðeach€enhancement€factor€foundóó€and€articulate€how€the€mitigating€and€enhancement€factors€haveÐ /(#' Ðbeen€evaluated€and€balanced€in€determining€the€sentence.ðð€€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597,€599Ð )h$( Ð(Tenn.€1994)€(emphasis€added).€€Because€the€trial€court€did€not€make€any€factual€findings€supportingÐ *Q%) Ðenhancement€of€Defendantððs€sentences€in€Case€Nos.€F53183A€and€F54156,€and€did€not€identifyÐ ê*:&* Ðwhich€enhancement€factors€it€found€applied,€we€reverse€the€judgment€as€to€sentencing€in€Case€Nos.Ð Ó+#'+ ÐF53183A€and€F54156,€and€remand€for€a€new€sentencing€hearing€as€to€the€length€of€the€sentencesÐ ° Ðin€those€cases.€€We€remand€this€for€a€new€sentencing€hearing€as€to€the€length€of€these€sentencesÐ ™é Ðbecause€the€record€reflects€that€certain€facts,€òòif€found€by€the€trial€courtóó€and€òòarticulatedóó€in€the€trialÐ ‚Ò Ðcourtððs€decision€òòmightóó€support€enhancement€of€the€sentences.€€We€further€note,€however,€theÐ k» Ðimposition€of€the€sentences€should€be€done€in€light€of€òòÔ_ÔBlakelyÔ_Ô€v.€Washingtonóó,€542€U.S.€____,€124Ð T¤ ÐS.€Ct.€2531€(2004).Ð =  ÐÌà  àThe€record€is€also€silent€as€to€the€basis€for€the€trial€courtððs€imposition€of€consecutiveÐ  _ Ðsentencing€in€Case€Nos.€F54156€and€F53183A.€€When€a€Defendant€is€convicted€of€multiple€crimes,Ð ø H Ðthe€trial€court,€in€its€discretion,€may€order€the€sentences€to€run€consecutively€if€it€finds€by€aÐ á 1  Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence€that€a€defendant€falls€into€one€of€the€seven€categories€contained€inÐ Ê   ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„115.€€The€State€argues€that€the€record€supports€a€findingÐ ³  Ðthat€Defendant€has€an€extensive€criminal€history€and€that€he€is€a€professional€criminal€whoseÐ œì  Ðcriminal€activities€are€a€major€source€of€the€Defendantððs€livelihood.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð …Õ  Ð115(a)(1)€and€(2).€€The€trial€court,€however,€specifically€found€that€Defendantððs€prior€criminalÐ n¾  Ðhistory€was€not€significant€and€declined€to€consider€the€Stateððs€argument€that€Defendant€was€aÐ W§  Ðprofessional€criminal€as€defined€by€the€statute€in€determining€whether€to€run€Defendantððs€sentencesÐ @ Ðconsecutively.€€Although€it€appears€that€the€results€of€Defendantððs€drug€test€played€a€significant€roleÐ )y Ðin€the€trial€courtððs€considerations,€the€failure€to€pass€a€drug€test€prior€to€sentencing€is€not€one€of€theÐ b Ðseven€enumerated€factors€that€would€support€an€order€of€consecutive€sentences.€€òòId.€óóðð€40„35„115.€Ð ûK ÐBecause€the€trial€court€did€not€provide€factual€findings€to€support€the€imposition€of€consecutiveÐ ä4 Ðsentencing€in€these€cases,€and€no€facts€to€justify€the€order€of€consecutive€sentencing€appear€in€theÐ Í Ðrecord,€we€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€order€that€Defendantððs€sentence€in€Case€No.€F54156€runÐ ¶ Ðconsecutively€with€his€sentences€in€Case€No.€F53183A.Ð Ÿï ÐÌà@GG%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ qÁ ÐÌà  àWe€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€order€that€Defendantððs€sentence€in€Case€No.€F54156€runÐ D” Ðconsecutively€with€his€sentence€in€Case€No.€F53183A€since€the€record€does€not€contain€evidenceÐ -} Ðthat€would€support€imposition€of€consecutive€sentencing.€€We€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€judgment€asÐ f Ðto€sentencing€in€Case€Nos.€F53183A€and€F54156,€and€remand€for€a€new€sentencing€hearing€as€toÐ ÿO Ðthe€length€of€the€sentences€in€these€cases.€€In€all€other€aspects,€the€judgments€are€affirmed.Ð è 8 ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à_________________________________________Ð £#ó" Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGE