WPC /86ԵF ViO9^|Wf Jx$֐w6OՀ30G';Vy֬}悿eD "Cg f@i/ħ0̪ƎH@]+ y &4 #wZF-'y4I*i {]jڀkNϞӜͩm-sm]?49NSr.Qk'Aݶ <*Hz?-Of޾SAta}xwE'B4ѸO؅NOrDCJO%Kl Rl98L_Rf7 َl&2s~~J~7l֦hcn8]#)# >UNI % 0(U:w@4?S{b 0 0DU:!  k rs U: U:oU:aU:4 AQn(U:(!U:III B 0Df 0D 0D D/22 Ba D3~HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLH(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($,cAZ"Arial Regular gDӀn~<$3|x q  ~$X X XXX ;X X  `   3    ThemajorityconcedesthatthetrialcourtsfindingthatcounselfulfilledhisobligationsunderRule `  14isadequatelysupportedbytherecordandthatthisCourtisboundbythisfinding.(v(2?$ !  X XXXX X X `   0  (#$  0  ,cAZ"Arial Regular   ~$X X XXX ;X X  `   2    Itmustalsoberememberedthatthereisnoperseconstitutionalrighttoevenafirsttierappeal `  muchlessdiscretionarysecondtierreview.Statev.Gillespie,898S.W.2d738,741(Tenn.Crim.App.   1994).   ~$XX͝XXX{X X͝ `   2    Itmustberememberedthatthereisnoproseconstitutionalrighttoevenafirsttierappealmuch `  lessdiscretionarysecondtierreview.Statev.Gillespie,898S.W.2d738,741(Tenn.Crim.App.1994) h  ?$X X-XXX  X X- `   1    Thelegislaturecouldofcourseauthorizeadelayedappealincaseswherethedeprivationofan `  appealistheresultofnonconstitutionalerrors.Todatehoweverithasnotdoneso.,cAZ"Arial Regular   ~$XXmXXXX Xm `   2    Itmustberememberedthatthereisnoproseconstitutionalrighttoevenafirsttierappealmuch `  lessdiscretionarysecondtierreview.Statev.Gillespie,898S.W.2d738,741(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).,cAZ"Arial Regular e  ~$XX XXX;X X  `   1    Thelegislaturecouldofcourseauthorizeadelayedappealincaseswherethedeprivationon `  appealistheresultofnonconstitutionalerrors.Todatehoweverithasnotdoneso.,cAZ"Arial Regular   ~$XX XXX;X X  `   2    Itmustberememberedthatthereisnoperseconstitutionalrighttoevenafirsttierappealmuch `  lessdiscretionarysecondtierreview.Statev.Gillespie,898S.W.2d738,741(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).,cAZ"Arial Regular !"#%C<< C  !"  X-XXX2,XX-   Ad FILEDX-X2,   November3,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr. XX-AppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular  !"  X-XXX2,XX-   Ad FILEDX-X2,   November2,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr. XX-AppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular dLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ''' dxdP Pd'dxd !  ` XX-XXXMXX-   TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdd7r(<,(j 8` `@E f ` ttx$X` rr(<,(j 8` `@E f ` ttx$X` rINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE `  t(>.*jx` `@E&T ` ttx$^ N tߛATJACKSONAUGUSTSESSION,1998  STATEOFTENNESSEE,  )  C.C.A.NO.02C019709CC00360 `  `     h   ) `  ` Appellee,   h   ) X   `     h   ) `     h   )  FAYETTECOUNTY X  VS. `     h   )   X   `     h   )  HON.JONKERRYBLACKWOOD  X   JACOBMEEKS,    h   )  JUDGE  X   `     h   )  X  ` Appellant.   h   )  (PostConviction) X  @&DDISSENTINGOPINION 0  ` AlthoughIagreewiththemajorityopinionthattheerrorofthetrialcourtclerkingivingtheappellantpropernoticepursuanttoRule14,RulesoftheSupremeCourt,mayhavecosttheappellanthisrighttoapplyforpermissiontoappealtotheTennesseeSupremeCourt,ImustdissentfromtheholdingoftheCourtthatsuchanomissionentitlestheappellanttopostconvictionreliefintheformofadelayedappeal. ` TennesseeCodeAnnotatedSection4030203providesthatreliefunderthePostConvictionActshallbegranted:8 ` 8 ` (#` (#...whentheconvictionorsentenceisvoidorvoidablebecauseoftheabridgmentofanyrightguaranteedbytheConstitutionofTennesseeortheConstitutionoftheUnitedStates.   TennesseeCodeAnnotatedSection4030213allowsadelayedappealwhena `8/0 criminaldefendantisunconstitutionallydeniedanappealfromhisconviction.  #  1      כIn `  Pinkstonv.State,668S.W.2d676(Tenn.Crim.App.1984);thisCourtconcluded P  thatasamatterofstateconstitutionallawtherighttotheeffectiveassistanceofcounselmandatedthatcounselmaynotunilaterallyactinsuchawaysoastodenyacriminaldefendantsecondtierreviewofhisconvictionintheTennesseeSupremeCourt.Id.at677.Thus,followinganaffirmanceofaconvictionondirectappeal,   counselhasadutytotimelyfileanapplicationforpermissiontoappealpursuanttoTenn.R.App.P.11,ortowithdrawfromthecasepursuanttoRule14,RulesoftheTennesseeSupremeCourt.Thislatterrulerequires,inorderforcounseltowithdraw,thatthedefendantbefullyapprisedinatimelyfashionofhisrightstosecondtierreviewandhowtopursuetheserights.Onlythenwilltheappellatecourtallowcounseltowithdraw.FailuretoeitherfileatimelyapplicationforpermissiontoappealortoproperlywithdrawunderRule14oftheRulesoftheSupremeCourtwouldresultinthegrantofadelayedopportunitytopresentanapplicationforpermissiontoappealtotheTennesseeSupremeCourt.Id.󀀜 $   ` PriortotheadoptionofRule28,RulesoftheTennesseeSupremeCourt,governingpostconvictionreliefprocedure,thedelayedopportunityatsecondtierreviewwasobtainedbythemechanismofhavingthetrialcourtconductanevidentiaryhearingwhereinthereasonforthefailuretofileatimelyapplicationforpermissiontoappealareisestablished.Ifitisestablishedthatthefailureistheresultoftheunilateralactofcounselinderogationofcounselsstateconstitutionaldutytogiveeffectiveassistance,thetrialcourtneverthelessdeniedthepostconvictionpetition.Onappealhowever,thisCourtcouldthenvacateitspreviousjudgmentandthenreinstatethejudgmentimmediatelysoastostartagainthetimeperiodforfiling 5,. anapplicationforpermissiontoappeal.Id.at67778. `   ` In1996theTennesseeSupremeCourt,pursuanttoalegislativedirectivetoadoptrulesgoverningprocedureincasesarisingunderthePostconvictionProceduresAct,adoptedRule28,RulesoftheTennesseeSupremeCourt.See,Tenn.CodeAnn.Sec.4030218.rule28,Sec.9(D)allowsthisCourttograntadelayedopportunityforsecondtierreviewwhenwefind:8 ` 8 ` (#` (#...thatthepetitionerwasdeprivedoftherighttorequestanappealpursuanttoRule11,TennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure.   Whilealiteralreadingofthisrulemightleadonetoconcludethatitwouldcoverthesituationpresentedhere,i.e.deprivationofdiscretionaryreviewthroughtheerrorofatrialcourtclerk,itmustberememberedthatRule28isintendedtobeconsistentwiththePostConvictionProceduresAct.See,Tenn.CodeAnn.Sec.4030218.Therefore,inmyopinionRule28cannotbereadtograntarighttodelayedsecondtierreviewunlessthedeprivationofsuchreviewistheresultofanabridgementofastateorfederalconstitutionalrightsuchasthestateconstitutionalrighttoeffectiveassistanceofcounsel.See,Pinkstonv.State,supra. p&  ` Heretofore,anyviolationofRule14whichresultedinthedeprivationofsecondtierreviewhasbeentiedtotheactionsorinactionsofthedefendantslawyerwhichconstitutesineffectiveassistanceofcounselunderthestateconstitution.IamunawareofanycaseannouncingaconstitutionalrighttohaveatrialcourtclerkgivenoticeasrequiredbySupremeCourtRule14,andIdonotbelieveanysuchrightexists.   %  2       2(*  ` Thus,IdonotbelievethetrialcourtclerkserrorunderRule14entitlestheappellanttopostconvictionreliefsolongasthetrialcourtsfindingsoffact, 5,. adequatelysupportedbytherecord,establishescounselactedproperlyunderRule14,RulesoftheTennesseeSupremeCourt.   %  3       P   ` Forthesereasons,Idissent. `     h     ___________________________ `     h     JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE