WPC $~^ ׎4s'`Vg#[ OgF|8-T$_=Fbu#)r+kc.PÑh!}]! 1m)QI5k 1u4N@Ɏ) pJһZ`:U\OT2Ji[n3%tؐ(}'趈sSӓv XNUJk{[ON&H(+ڼ.DK>>2?&xXcHZෂ5""udD߽ozS3jgRp-FWBtM7uXZ&b+jћ*6DA=}/neۿP&G[ DޥkdSH}ssSi t>V Gת;T1;]+W;ն1r'No铎Ńb#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz   _ %  NEb 0 B 0 D5i D- 0K ASi 0/ 0D AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5e,,,,0Q+ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularJr*Dӝk1p C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2$ !.8Iudd8         0  XX d(|3$ !.8Iudd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8Iudd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Iudd8     _8XXdd8XX  B4XX@ttINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE & #XXB4#@ IuXXJune19,2001Session#XXIu#Ԉ L   IuXXԀSTATEOFTENNESSEEv.DONALDJ.MOORE#XXIuH#  J ̀@@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforCoffeeCounty  J @@No.29,824FJohnW.Rollins,Judge  :   @*AV) ` dE<` A߈   @ No.M200002621CCAR3CDFiledAugust7,_2001_Ԉ   AV) ` dE<` A      ThomasT._Woodall_,J.,dissenting. h   Irespectfullydissentfromthemajorityopinioninthiscase.First,Iamcompelledtonote @ thatthereisnotatranscriptoftheguiltypleahearingintherecord.Itiswellsettledthatwhena ,| defendantappealsasentencingissueandfailstoprovideatranscriptoftheguiltypleahearinginthe h record,thatthiscourtpresumesthattheactionofthetrialcourtwascorrect.  SeeStatev.Keen,996 T S.W.2d842,844(Tenn._Crim_.App.1999);Statev._Griffis_,964S.W.2d577,59293(Tenn._Crim_. D App.1997).  0    Inaddition,evenifthetranscriptoftheguiltypleahearinghadnotbeenomitted,I  respectfullyconcludethatifthejudgmentofthetrialcourtmustbereversed,themattershouldbe  remandedtogivethetrialcourttheopportunitytostateontherecordwhyhedeniedjudicial | diversion.SeeStatev._Herron_,767S.W.2d151,156(Tenn.1989)(requiringatrialcourttoclearly h stateontherecorditsspecificreasonsfordenyingjudicialdiversion,inordertoallowformeaningful T  appellatereview);seealso,Statev._Hammersley_,650S.W.2d352,355(Tenn.1983);Statev. @!  _Bonestel_,871S.W.2d163,168(Tenn._Crim_.App.1993),overruledonothergroundsbyStatev. ,"|! Hooper,29S.W.3d1,9(Tenn.2000).Whetheranaccusedshouldbegrantedjudicialdiversionis #h" aquestionwhichaddressesitselftothesounddiscretionofthetrialcourt._Bonestel_,871S.W.2dat $T# 168.Thiscourtwillnotinterferewiththerefusalofthetrialcourttograntjudicialdiversionifthere $@ $ is anysubstantialevidencetosupporttherefusalcontainedintherecord.Id.Whenthetrialcourt %,!% errsbyfailingtostateontherecordhisreasonsfordenyingjudicialdiversion,themattershouldbe &"& remandedforclarificationbythetrialcourt.Forthiscourttograntjudicialdiversioninthis '#' particularcase,withoutaremandtothetrialcourt,wouldbesubstitutingourdiscretionforthe (#( discretionofthetrialcourt. )$)    `     h   __________________________________________ P,',    `     h     THOMAST._WOODALL_,JUDGE