ÿWPC …# VUNa %¯ 0(µw@Ý4 1 @ 0JH 0T’ 0^æ 0hD 0r¬ 0| 0†š 0 1u° 0d% U>‰ B)Ç DCð U*3 AM]⪠BŒv~©vÓ' D3ú 0@- AOmƼ 0D‚ D/Æ Bõ˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ vEwUxEyDzT{U|E}~Ó€Ô¡¨ xp3|xˆ2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d 7Border 1dd< Œ 9p`(Arial€-!Cþÿ << Gÿÿ ØÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€"ÔÔ€"ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€"XÔÌÌOctober€16,€1997ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó ó dPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  ion-F Geneva ÒÒ  ion-F Geneva Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  Ý›Ñ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÒ  ÒÒ H ÒÑ\R AØ'\Ñò òœÙ€€ÙÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€"ÔßR€#$!A1-j|` ç `€€@ÿRß›Þ ÞÌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌAT€NASHVILLEÌÌAUGUST€1997€SESSIONÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àC.C.A.€No.€01C01„9609„CC„00403€Ìà àó óAppellee,ò òà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àWILLIAMSON€COUNTYÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHON.€DONALD€P.€HARRIS,€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àJUDGEÌTONEY€MOORE,à àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó ó(Probation€Revocation)ò òÌà àó óAppellant.ò òà àà àà àà à)ÌÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àà àà àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌJOHN€H.€HENDERSONà àà àà àà àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÌó óDistrict€Public€Defenderò òà àà àà àà àó óAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌò òÌLARRY€D.€œDROLSUM›à àà àà àà àGEORGIA€BLYTHE€FELNERÌó óAssistant€Public€Defenderò òà àà àó óà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ407„C€Main€St.à àà àà àà àò òà àó ó450€James€Robertson€Parkwayò òÌó óP.O.€Box€68ò òà àó óà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€Tennessee€€€37243„0493ÌFranklin,€Tennessee€37065„0068à àà àà àà àà àà à€€Ïà àà àà àà àò òà àà àà àà àJOSEPH€D.€BAUGH,€JR.ó óÌò òà àà àà àó óà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€Generalò òÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJEFFREY€P.€BURKSÌó óà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€Generalò òÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àó óWilliamson€County€CourthouseÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àSte.€G„6ò ò,€ó óP.O.€Box€937Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àFranklin,€œTennessee›€œ€37065„0937›Ìò òÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€_________________ÌÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌÌJOE€G.€RILEY,ÌœJUDGEÇÑ7€–wXXdìXXdì7Ñà@ àOPINION›Ìó óÌÌÓÓà àThe€appellant,€Toney€Moore,€appeals€the€Williamson€County€CriminalÏCourtððs€order€revoking€his€probation€and€requiring€œthe›€sentence€to€be€servedÏconsecutively€to€a€new€conviction.€€He€presents€two€issues€for€our€review:€œ(1)›Ïwhether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€failing€to€reinstate€his€probation;€andÏœ(2)›€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€requiring€the€original€sentence€to€be€servedÏconsecutively€to€the€conviction€triggering€the€probation€œviolation.›€€The€judgment€ofÏthe€trial€court€is€AFFIRMED.ÌœÌò òà@ àPROCEDURAL€HISTORY›Ìà àœÌó ó›à àThe€appellant€pled€guilty€œin€August€1994€to›€two€(2)€unrelated€and€separateÏindictments€charging€various€œoffenses.›€€He€was€œultimately€placed›€on€supervisedÏœprobation.›€€Appellantððs€original€probation€violation€warrant€issued€on€March€4,Ï1996,€did€not€include€the€second€case€in€which€the€appellant€received€probation;Ïhowever,€it€was€referred€to€at€the€hearing.€€After€the€hearing€œrevoking›€appellantððsÏœprobation,›€the€original€warrant€was€amended€to€include€the€second€case.€€AllÏparties€agreed€that€the€evidence€from€the€probation€violation€hearing€based€on€theÏoriginal€warrant€would€apply€to€the€second€case.€€The€trial€court€issued€an€amendedÏorder,€noted€the€stipulation,€and€revoked€the€appellantððs€probation€in€both€cases.€ÏThe€appellant€then€filed€a€motion€to€consolidate€the€two€cases€which€was€grantedÍby€the€trial€court.€€This€Court€issued€an€order€consolidating€the€cases€pursuant€toÏœTenn.€R.€App.€P.›€17;€therefore,€both€cases€are€properly€before€this€court€for€œreview.›ÌÌÌÌÌœò òÌÌà@ àA.›€Case€No.€I„494„113ó óÌÌà àOn€August€œ8,›€1994,€the€appellant€pled€guilty€to€criminal€impersonation,Ïdriving€on€a€revoked€license€(5th€offense),€and€unauthorized€possession€of€aÏvehicle.€€For€criminal€œimpersonation›€he€received€a€suspended€sentence€of€six€(6)Ïmonths€and€supervised€probation.€€€For€driving€on€a€revoked€license€he€received€œsixÏ(6)€months€suspended€with€supervised€probation€for€(11)›€months€and€twenty„nineÏ(29)€œdays.€›€For€unauthorized€possession€of€a€vehicle€he€received€eleven€(11)Ïmonths€and€twenty„nine€(29)€days,€all€of€which€was€suspended€and€supervisedÏprobation.€€The€judgments€indicate€the€œsentences›€were€to€be€served€concurrentlyÏœwith›€each€other€and€œconsecutively›€to€the€sentences€imposed€œin€Case€No.€I„494„114.›ÌœÌ›Ìò òÓ  ÓœB.›€Case€No.€I„494„114ó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àIn€the€second€case,€the€appellant€pled€œguilty€on€the€same€date€to›€assault,Ïevading€arrest,€and€escape.€€He€received€a€suspended€six€(6)€month€sentence€forÏevading€arrest.€€For€the€assault€he€received€a€sentence€of€eleven€(11)€œmonths€and›Ïtwenty„nine€(29)€œdays€in€confinement.€€The€assault›€and€evading€arrest€sentencesÏwere€to€be€served€consecutively€œto€the›€two€(2)€year€sentence€imposed€for€escapeÏand€the€sentences€in€œCase€No.€I„494„113,›€but€concurrently€œwith›€each€other.€€TheÏappellant€was€œreleased›€on€supervised€œprobation€on€January€27,€1995.›ÌÌœà@ àò òC.ó ó›ÌœÌ›à àœIn›€March€œ1996,›€a€jury€found€the€appellant€guilty€of€driving€while€beingÏdeclared€œan›€Habitual€Motor€Vehicle€Offender€(HMVO),€a€Class€E€felony.€€He€wasÏsentenced€as€a€œRange€II,›€multiple€offender,€to€four€(4)€years.€€œA›€probation€violationÏwarrant€was€issued€based€on€this€offense.€€A€hearing€was€held€on€the€probationÏviolation€warrant€œin›€June€œ1996.›€€Ìà àœEven€though€he€was€convicted€of€the€HMVO€violation,€the›€appellant€testifiedÏand€denied€that€he€had€done€any€driving.€€He€explained€that€he€arranged€for€aÏfriend,€œTheresa›€Cotham,€to€drive€him€to€Nashville€that€day.€€On€the€return€trip€homeÏthe€two€experienced€a€flat€tire.€€He€indicated€that€Cotham€got€a€ride€to€get€help€andÏa€jack€to€fix€the€tire,€but€that€he€stayed€with€the€car.€€Shortly€thereafter,€a€policeÏofficer€approached€him€and€asked€if€he€was€with€the€disabled€car.€€After€receivingÍan€affirmative€œresponse,›€the€officer€assisted€the€œappellant.›€€The€officer€then€askedÏfor€the€appellantððs€driverððs€license€which€resulted€in€his€arrest.€Ìà àœTheresa›€Cotham€also€testified€at€the€hearing.€€She€confirmed€the€appellantððsÏtestimony€and€stated€that€she€drove€him€to€Nashville€and€that€at€no€time€in€herÏpresence€did€the€appellant€operate€any€œautomobile.Ìà àSheila›€Taylor,€appellantððs€probation€officer,€also€testified€on€his€behalf.€€WithÏthe€exception€of€constantly€changing€jobs€and€the€HMVO€conviction,€she€stated€thatÏappellant€had€complied€with€all€other€conditions€of€his€probation.€Ìà àOutside€of€the€presentence€report,€the€state€did€not€offer€any€œproof€as€it€reliedÏon€the€HMVO€conviction.›ÌÌœà@ àò òABUSE›€OF€DISCRETIONÌó óÌà àAppellant€argues€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€failing€to€reinstate€hisÏprobation.€€Specifically,€he€contends€the€trial€court€erred€in€relying€on€the€HabitualÏMotor€Vehicle€Offender€(HMVO)€conviction€since€the€state€failed€to€introduce€aÏcertified€copy€of€the€judgment.Ìà àA€trial€court€may€revoke€probation€and€order€the€imposition€of€the€originalÏsentence€upon€a€finding€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€person€hasÏviolated€a€condition€of€probation.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310,€311.€€The€decisionÏto€revoke€probation€rests€within€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòState€v.ÏMitchellóó,€810€S.W.2d€733,€735€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Probation€revocations€areÍsubject€to€an€abuse€of€discretion,€rather€than€a€òòde€novoóó€standard€of€review.€€òòState€v.ÏHarkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€€An€abuse€of€discretion€is€shown€if€theÏrecord€is€devoid€of€substantial€evidence€to€support€the€conclusion€that€a€violation€ofÏprobation€has€occurred.€€òòIdóó.€€The€evidence€at€the€revocation€hearing€need€onlyÏshow€that€the€trial€court€exercised€a€conscientious€and€intelligent€judgment€inÏmaking€its€decision.€€òòState€v.€Leachóó,€914€S.W.2d€104,€106€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).Ìà à€The€evidence€in€this€case€fully€supports€the€trial€courtððs€order€of€revocation.€ÏAt€the€hearing,€the€HMVO€conviction€triggering€the€probation€warrant€wasÏestablished€without€dispute.€€Preceding€the€hearing€the€trial€judge€asked€defenseÏcounsel€about€the€HMVO€offense€and€counsel€replied,€ð ðthat€was€a€trial€we€had€inÏthe€Circuit€Court€in€which€the€jury€found€[the€defendant]€guilty€of€the€offense.ðð€ÏWithout€objection€from€the€defense,€the€district€attorney€submitted€a€certified€copy€ofÏthe€trial€court€order€indicating€guilt€and€introduced€the€presentence€report,Ïevidencing€the€HMVO€arrest€and€conviction.€€The€appellant€reviewed€theÏpresentence€report€on€cross„examination€and€conceded€to€itððs€content.€€Noting€theÏHMVO€conviction€and€the€appellantððs€lengthy€history€of€driving€offenses,€the€trialÏjudge€revoked€appellantððs€probation.€€The€trial€court€œproperly€relied€upon€theÏconviction›€as€a€basis€for€revocation.€ÌÌœà@ àò òCONSECUTIVE›€œSENTENCINGó ó›ÌÌà àAppellant€argues€the€trial€court€erred€in€requiring€his€original€two€(2)€yearÍsentence€to€be€served€consecutively€to€the€four€(4)€year€sentence€imposed€for€theÏHMVO€conviction.Ìà àRule€32(c)(2)€of€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure€provides€that€œa›€trialÏcourt€may€require€a€sentence€to€run€œconsecutively›€to€any€prior€sentence€not€fullyÏserved.€€Trial€courts€also€have€the€œexpress€statutory€authority›€to€revoke€aÏsuspended€sentence€and€order€it€to€be€served€consecutively€to€a€subsequentÏsentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310;€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòKenny€DeWayne€Covington€v.ÏStateóó,€C.C.A.€No.€01C01„9401„CR„00010€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€October€6,€1994,Ïat€Nashville)òò€perm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€œ1995).€€This€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌà àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€€AFFIRMED.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àòòà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óó€€ÌJ.€CURWOOD€WITT,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌJOE€H.€WALKER,€III,€SPECIAL€JUDGE