ÿWPCw îIÇ¢P“Kgëf;ž™~jRbðp~T«—S|‰¦Å1™ “Ò‡µ½•–ýûH‰ä3Ñ÷/òwÎËÔ®¿–²bí‘7³” ºÔÓYÁ­ŒC;ô4tšž±-:|n”ŽÁníŸ<Çp¥Ç›4êpAsÇ|fó.&IoÃ4¤’%dç®ä%UìÓ€k'ØæDq狦 .gÎü ĺêµÝßLäp82å7…½½d]SîøbæäÖ¯ ®öÖpHEèœ~i dÉúe=‘ÊÊ¥=LIHƒZÖ84ú›Áøän–ëý-Ìú0¤hæýŠЙvÖ÷WŠr‹ûI ›æn8KÝ”+Ù|}’ §CÉ,¹ n¼@ ²§‹=Ûþ—¤Æ¹o¥÷xßÁ´çË ¾B¨ĩ9Á #éÜU¾qòaBN¿<òõÑB]°ûÖ ÁÊšÚ÷Ý@ÝãpNa¸´LŸ I´Õt%X` fÖ Yš†Uƒg€.®IìœuDÖê£FþgŒ•]TR:ýøß•õñ%½àA‡‹,™1e÷ÍõAQ·_–IÓ±#[H;›9iwÚØ|=އ Êk~@¡° }š÷"éýý>ZJìü¬®­0‹b#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ UN· w 4 z Ò— i x mz ^‘ Æï Ƶ Æ{ÆA 0DNKMMEUUTWÁ«««««««««««««««««««««bllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 0ëtttt B__ 0¤| D3  D-S 0K€€ ASËÆ 0¤ä 0Dˆ A«Ì˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»ãp+â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularYo†)  ` ¢ ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ TÝ ƒRÕ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôô­ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€There€is€a€discrepancy€between€the€indictment,€which€charges€the€defendant€with€theft€of€property€over€$500,Ð ° Ðand€the€judgment,€which€states€that€he€pled€guilty€to€theft€of€property€over€$1000.€Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó  JÝ ƒRÕ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôô­ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€According€to€the€State,€this€revocation€warrant€was€filed€July€2,€1997,€but€was€not€served€until€some€time€later.€Ð ° ÐThe€warrant€itself€is€not€included€in€the€record€before€this€court.€ ·Ý ƒRÕ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôô­ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€In€a€subsequent€hearing€held€on€August€15,€2000,€the€defendant€claimed€to€have€a€letter€from€the€TennesseeÐ ° ÐDepartment€of€Correction€stating€that€his€sentence€had€expired.€€The€letter,€however,€was€ð ðdown€in€[his]€cellðð€andÐ tÄ Ðtherefore€unavailable€to€the€trial€court.€€- ù-(|G2Õ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€M5»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôô­ò»»Ô d(|3z$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€M5»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3z$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€M5»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€M5»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼M5»»»ÔÑ8€ùXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îT”M5ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@õõ%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼M5»îîT” #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€July€11,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XùX»¼M5ÔÌò òÔ#†¼M5»XXù#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€KEVIN€JERMAINE€MORRISÔ‡XùX»¼M5Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Madison€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€95„738€€€€€€Roy€B.€Morgan,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2000„02166„CCA„R3„CD€€Ô_Ô„Ô_Ô€Filed€August€13,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€State€sought€revocation€of€the€defendantððs€probation€for€his€allegedly€failing€to€report€to€hisÐ xÈ  Ðprobation€officer€within€seventy„two€hours€of€his€release€from€jail,€failing€to€provide€proof€ofÐ d´ Ðemployment,€failing€to€complete€required€community€service€work,€failing€to€provide€a€DNAÐ P  Ðsample,€and€failing€to€pay€probation€fees.€€After€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€revoked€the€probation,Ð <Œ Ðfinding€that€the€defendant€had€violated€four€of€its€conditions.€€On€appeal€to€this€court,€the€defendantÐ (x Ðpresents€the€sole€issue€of€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€revoking€his€probation.€€Based€upon€ourÐ d Ðreview,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€However,€we€remand€for€entry€of€a€correctedÐ P Ðjudgment.Ð ì< ÐÔ#†¼M5»XXù“#ÔÔ‡XùX»¼M5ÔÌÓÛÓò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmed€andÐ Ä ÐRemanded€for€Entry€of€a€Corrected€Judgmentó óÐ ° ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼M5»àXùf#ÔÔ‡XùX.¼M5ÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJerry€L.€Smith,€J.óó,€joined.€€òòDavidÐ ˆØ ÐG.€Hayes,€J.óó,€filed€a€concurring€opinion.Ð tÄ ÐÌGeorge€Morton€Googe,€District€Public€Defender,€and€Stephen€P.€Spracher,€Assistant€District€PublicÐ L œ ÐDefender,€for€the€appellant,€Kevin€Jermaine€Morris.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Kim€R.€Helper,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð #`" ÐJames€G.€Woodall,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Jody€S.€Pickens,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ ü#L# ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð è$8 $ ÐÓE ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼M5»XXùt #ÔÔ‡XùX»¼M5ÔÐ À&"& ÐÌò òòòÐ  ˜(è#(ý ÐFACTSó óóóòòóóÔ#†¼M5»XXùŽ #ÔÐ ° ÐÓ  ÓÔ€XùX»¼M5Ôà  àOn€May€23,€1996,€the€defendant,€Kevin€Jermaine€Morris,€pled€guilty€in€the€Circuit€Court€ofÐ œì ÐMadison€County€to€one€count€of€felony€theft€of€property׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€and€one€count€of€theft€of€property€underÐ ˆØ Ð$500,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€He€was€placed€on€deferred€probation€for€two€years€and€ordered€toÐ tÄ Ðserve€his€sentence€on€Community€Corrections,€with€the€potential€for€an€order€of€dismissal€andÐ `° Ðexpungement€of€his€record€upon€his€successful€completion€of€his€sentence.€€€Following€the€issuanceÐ L œ Ðof€a€revocation€warrant,׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€the€defendantððs€deferred€probation€was€revoked€in€July€1999,€and€he€wasÐ 8 ˆ Ðordered€to€serve€two€years€incarceration.€€On€September€17,€1999,€he€was€released€from€custody€andÐ $ t Ðplaced€on€probation.€€Among€other€conditions€of€his€probation,€the€defendant€was€ordered€to€reportÐ  ` Ðto€his€probation€officer€within€seventy„two€hours€of€his€release;€seek€and€maintain€steadyÐ ü L  Ðemployment;€pay€all€required€probation€fees;€perform€eight€hours€of€community€service€work€perÐ è 8  Ðmonth;€and€report€to€the€health€department€within€ten€working€days€of€his€release€to€provide€a€DNAÐ Ô$  Ðsample.€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àOn€January€19,€2000,€Julia€Sipes,€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Probation€and€Parole€officer€Ð ˜è  Ðassigned€to€supervise€the€defendant,€filed€a€probation€violation€report€against€him.€A€probationÐ „Ô  Ðrevocation€hearing€was€held€on€July€17,€2000.€€Sipes€testified€that€the€defendant€was€supposed€toÐ pÀ Ðhave€reported€to€her€within€seventy„two€hours€of€his€September€17,€1999,€release€from€custody,€butÐ \¬ Ðthe€only€time€he€had€ever€reported€was€on€October€5,€1999.€€She€said€that€she€had€reviewed€theÐ H˜ Ðconditions€of€his€probation€with€him,€explaining,€among€other€things,€that€he€was€to€report€to€theÐ 4„ Ðhealth€department€to€provide€a€DNA€sample,€and€that€he€had€to€contact€the€community€service€workÐ  p Ðcoordinator€to€arrange€for€performance€of€his€community€service.€€She€said€that€the€defendant€failedÐ  \ Ðto€provide€a€DNA€sample,€failed€to€perform€his€community€service€work,€and€failed€to€provide€herÐ øH Ðwith€any€proof€of€his€employment.€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€testified€that€he€had€reported€to€Sipes€on€Monday,€September€20,€1999.€€HeÐ ¼  Ðsaid€that€Sipes€had€not€told€him€about€any€community€service€work,€and€had€said€that€she€would€getÐ ¨ø Ðhis€DNA€sample€from€the€Department€of€Correction.€€The€defendant€testified€that€his€last€meetingÐ ”ä Ðwith€Sipes€had€been€in€October€1999,€at€which€time€he€had€informed€her€that€his€sentence€expiredÐ €Ð Ðthat€month.€€She€had€told€him€that€he€was€on€probation€until€2001.€€He€said€that€he€had€requestedÐ l¼ Ðpaperwork€form€the€Department€of€Correction€that€would€prove€his€sentence€had€expired,€but€thatÐ X ¨ Ðthey€refused€to€give€him€the€records.׃h×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Sipes,€he€said,€ð ðwas€supposed€to€call€and€get€the€records,ðð€butÐ D!” Ðð ðshe€never€did.ðð€€According€to€the€defendant,€he€had€not€reported€to€Sipes€after€October€1999Ð 0"€  Ðbecause€his€sentence€had€already€been€served.Ð #l! Їà  àFollowing€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€issued€an€order€revoking€the€defendantððs€probation€andÐ ° Ðordering€that€he€serve€his€sentence€as€originally€imposed.€The€court€found€that€the€preponderanceÐ œì Ðof€evidence€showed€that€the€defendant€had€violated€the€terms€of€his€probation€by€failing€to€report€toÐ ˆØ Ðhis€probation€officer€as€directed;€failing€to€complete€community€service€work;€failing€toÐ tÄ Ðverify/maintain€employment;€and€failing€to€submit€a€DNA€sample.Ð `° ÐÌà@òò&ìàòòò òANALYSISˆÐ 8 ˆ Ðó óóóÌà  àThe€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€revoking€his€probation.€Ð  ` ÐWhile€conceding€that€he€failed€to€provide€documentary€proof€of€his€claims,€the€defendant€contendsÐ ü L  Ðthat€the€trial€court€should€have€given€more€weight€to€his€testimony,€and€declared€his€sentence€to€beÐ è 8  Ðcompleted.€The€State€argues€that€the€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€revoking€theÐ Ô$  Ðdefendantððs€probation.€€The€State€asserts€that€the€preponderance€of€the€evidence€supports€the€trialÐ À  Ðcourtððs€decision€in€this€case.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  à€A€trial€court€is€granted€broad€authority€to€revoke€a€suspended€sentence€and€to€reinstate€theÐ „Ô  Ðoriginal€sentence€if€it€finds€by€the€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€defendant€has€violated€theÐ pÀ Ðterms€of€his€or€her€probation€and€suspension€of€sentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„310€and€40„35„Ð \¬ Ð311€(1997).€€The€revocation€of€probation€lies€within€the€soundò òòòóóó ó€€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòStateÐ H˜ Ðv.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991);€òòState€v.€Stubblefieldóó,€953€S.W.2d€223,€226€(Tenn.Ð 4„ ÐCrim.€App.€1997)òòóó;€òòState€v.€Mitchellóó,€810€S.W.2d€733,€735€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€To€show€anÐ  p Ðabuse€of€discretion€in€a€probation€revocation€case,€ð ðthere€must€be€no€substantial€evidence€to€supportÐ  \ Ðthe€conclusion€of€the€trial€court€that€a€violation€of€the€conditions€of€probation€has€occurred.ðð€òòStateÐ øH Ðv.€Gerald€H.€Shafferóó,€No.€E1998„00106„SC„R11„CD,€2001€WL€277914,€at€*1€(Tenn.€March€22,Ð ä4 Ð2001)€(citing€òòHarkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€at€82).òòóó€€The€proof€of€a€probation€violation€need€not€be€establishedÐ Ð  Ðbeyond€a€reasonable€doubt,€but€it€is€sufficient€if€it€allows€the€trial€court€to€make€a€conscientious€andÐ ¼  Ðintelligent€judgment.€€òòHarkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€at€82€(citing€òòState€v.€Miltonóó,€673€S.W.2d€555,€557€(Tenn.Ð ¨ø ÐCrim.€App.€1984)).€€We€review€this€issue,€therefore,€for€an€abuse€of€discretion.€Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àOur€review€of€the€record€reveals€no€abuse€of€discretion€by€the€trial€court€in€this€case.€€TheÐ l¼ Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence€clearly€supports€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€the€defendant€violatedÐ X ¨ Ðthe€terms€of€his€probation.€€Probation€Officer€Sipes€clearly€testified€that€the€defendant€reported€toÐ D!” Ðher€only€once,€on€October€5,€1999,€well€beyond€the€seventy„two„hour€time€limit€established€by€theÐ 0"€  Ðconditions€of€his€probation.€€She€further€testified€that,€despite€her€instructions€to€the€contrary,€theÐ #l! Ðdefendant€failed€to€perform€his€required€community€service,€failed€to€submit€a€DNA€sample,€andÐ $X" Ðfailed€to€provide€her€with€proof€of€his€employment.€Ð ô$D # ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€should€have€given€more€weight€to€his€testimony,Ð Ì&"% Ðmuch€of€which€contradicted€that€of€Officer€Sipes.€€Questions€concerning€the€credibility€of€witnessesÐ ¸'#& Ðand€the€weight€to€be€given€their€testimony,€however,€are€resolved€not€by€this€court,€but€by€the€trialÐ ¤(ô#' Ðcourt.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€453,€461€(Tenn.€1999);€òòState€v.€Odomóó,€928€S.W.2d€18,€23Ð )à$( Ð(Tenn.€1996).€€Furthermore,€as€the€defendant€himself€acknowledges,€he€failed€to€provide€anyÐ |*Ì%) Ðdocumentation€of€his€claim€that€his€sentence€had€been€fully€served€by€October€1999.€Ð h+¸&* Їà  àIn€sum,€the€preponderance€of€the€evidence€in€the€record€supports€the€trial€courtððs€finding€thatÐ ° Ðthe€defendant€violated€the€terms€of€his€probation.€€Accordingly,€we€find€no€abuse€of€discretion€byÐ œì Ðthe€trial€court€in€revoking€the€defendantððs€probation.€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà@FF%ìàò òòòCONCLUSIONˆÐ `° ÐÌóóó óà  àBased€upon€a€careful€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€WeÐ 8 ˆ Ðremand€the€matter€to€the€trial€court€for€entry€of€a€corrected€judgment€showing€that€the€defendantððsÐ $ t Ðplea€of€guilty€was€to€theft€over€$500,€a€Class€E€felony,€for€which€he€was€indicted,€rather€than€forÐ  ` Ðtheft€over€$1000,€a€Class€D€felony,€as€the€judgment€now€reflects.Ð ü L  Ðòòò òÌó óóóòòóóÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð „Ô  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE