WPC #BIBI#<̺ ȱ]}5)ZPkQB' akw{nos,Ro #ə갋b"1*%چޣy#Uy@w )Gm"Ȉn0W\$+iG#p9We% \a1eM Ԑ0nKFCoBj{m_S֦r*=%,8~nPݢ%&Ue(7Kl VeAD^~abQscƴG–s>2XBc*p4Q6m7k]U}Gܩ7$\F.,r'ٓ~q'-gNm`/l*Zp[Ai-2Q#cl![*5L&;R܋F꿥A $2HT8KFӃAYWMDN- HM*b#\ %% N+ 0- UN z } zO  ^ w  q74NE mb 0 B 0 D5 D- 0K AS4 0M 0D A5\\IB01S02\CLERKJAC,,,,0(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptRst/ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5y.rtyBarN3|xU WeinmanTiptonT.R.A.P. CrimAdkissonDupreeRICKY i]fLillieTERRANCET.C.A.- -(|G2s$ !.8dd8         0   d(|3$ !.8dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _TRX3'Avery 5159 AddressX3' Letter3'Letter159 AddressTRX3'3'LetterTX   8?XXdd8@hh|nINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#|nn#Ԉ #   AssignedonBriefsJune3,2003 F X?X #XX?e#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.TERRANCEG.MOTLEYX?X  ? @@ AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforShelbyCounty  9 @@No.0001715,16JosephB.Dailey,Judge  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200202079CCAR3CDFiledNovember14,_2003_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^     #X?#X?X.JosephM.Tipton,J.,concurring. ?   Iconcurintheresultreachedandmostofthereasoninginthemajorityopinion.However, a IdonotbelievethatweshouldrelyonT.C.A.4018110tobarreliefinthiscaserelativetoajury J instructionforthelesserincludedoffenseof#XX?8#X?Xattemptedvoluntarymanslaughter.Thestatehasnot 3 raisedthestatutetobarthedefendantsjuryinstructionclaim,and,obviously,thedefendanthasnot  hadanopportunitytoaddressthevalidityofthestatute.Inthisrespect,Ibelievethatlegitimate  questionsexistabouttheconstitutionalityof,atleast,partofT.C.A.4018110#XX?#X?Xbutthatthiscase  isnottheonetoanswerthosequestions.Thefactthatnoharmcouldflowtothedefendantunder  thecircumstancesinthiscaseissufficient,byitself,towarrantaffirmingthejudgmentsof p conviction.Therefore,Iconcurinthemajorityopinion. Y #XX? #X?X   `     h     ____________________________________ M    `     h     JOSEPHM.TIPTON,JUDGE  6   #XX?^ #