ÿWPCÆ tYS-#V’Û"V’¬ûl¸"mO s:–Y~~¦xÚø(½ú#V"Ï™­¥`Y2|7lJk%VZE«ýpÏnÿ°+‘0˜0³ÈYê½]êÖ“'ǹ#¶ªäÀUY`±Ë:í8-±°ŽQNÙOÊÏR–T¨%©yCÀÀasmžq][O ™§EøÚ0;%Å' ˜®˜W²¿ZnR–Œßjqš³SõJWˆ/1hÈøXÞAÜ4 3iï%úgIõ6í'€¶eù)ˆñüL CÕé;;–ñ1Õ¢ô(Ù07ó ®YÀºgô]¥ö~®Øfÿ¯ç Ùxa\¼5T­ŽlÌ&Ôâ,ê×ܸ”¾IÑYÍe‰Wª'þh«P>«:Ùg­¢‘It²U‡Ó•g£ò¥ç<5â£ÜUF5Ôžh×(Íáð)]+llûãø2|Z.Í“¹ Áà8n®Ò>U¯J%*ž2ZÎ eåÁ:‰G€=¨Ã.VKy ÝQ@`À­úÚuNEn fhΑ¤Sõl\0'™_ká³)‹‘ª%PÎ}¦0ë 6½Ð²œ4¥-Á['k,¨‹'†"7àù;Q ©VÀXì§äq=×!A%µ²^Ô|&b#É\ %% ^ + 0ˆ7 U!N¿ w 4 z% ÒŸ q € m‚ 0D™ ÆÝ Æ£ ÆiÆ/UNõNC’E¬×Eƒ……………………………………………………………bœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœ 0 ¤¤¤¤ B®® 0¤Ë D3o D-¢ 0KÏÏ ASÆm 0¤3 0D× A«˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6ÒV,,,,ÒV0»ô³42î (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular J‰1B013R2 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular ˆÔ_ÔÓ  Óà  àòòÔ‡ô½ò¤»Ô1óóTheÔ#†»’Y»òô½+#Ô€Ô€ô½ò»»’YÔorder€was€entered€on€April€1,€2004.€€We€note€that€the€order€indicates€that€the€habeas€corpus€petition€wasÐ ° Ðfiled€on€March€11,€2004,€while€the€petition€itself€bears€a€clerkððs€stamp€indicating€it€was€filed€on€March€31,€2004. NEELYRICKYHCRiverbendKestneriFredrickPassarellaLuttrell Ý ƒRÍk$ÝÓ  ÓÔ€ô½ò»»Ôà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô½òòô½ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ô½òòô½ÔThe€petitioner€asserts,€without€explanation,€that€he€was€sentenced€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÐ ° Ðsection€40„35„501(i)(1),€which€had€an€effective€date€the€month€after€the€offenses€to€which€he€pled€guilty,€rather€thanÐ qÁ Ðunder€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„13„523(a),€which€became€effective€in€1992,€several€years€before€theÐ 2‚ Ðoffenses.€€Our€review€of€the€record€on€appeal€has€revealed€no€basis€for€this€claim.€€In€fact,€both€require€that€he€serveÐ óC Ð100%€of€his€sentences.€€Ô#†ô½òòô½#Ô- ù-(›G2Ík$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€’Y»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ€ô½ò»»Ôà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô½òòô½Ô d(|3¿$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€’Y»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3¿$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€’Y»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€’Y»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼’Y»»»ÔÑ8€À;XXdé»»d8Ñà@hhìàÔ‡îu&’YÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@gg$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼’Y»îîu& #ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€November€17,€2004Ð öF ÐÔ‡XÀ;X»¼’YÔÌò òÔ#†¼’Y»XXÀ;"#ÔMICHAEL€S.€NEELYòòóó€v.€RICKY€BELL,€WardenòòóóÔ‡XÀ;X»¼’YÔó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€C„3505€€€€€€Steve€R.€Dozier,€JudgeÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2004„01012„CCA„R3„HC€„€Filed€January€20,€Ô_Ô2005Ô_ÔÐ ŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X`6 XXXÀ;ÔThe€petitioner€appeals€the€summary€dismissal€of€his€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus,€arguing€thatÐ V¦  Ðthe€trial€court€imposed€a€sentence€which€was€illegal€and€void€because€it€was€òòex€post€factoóó;€that€trialÐ ? Ðcounsel€was€ineffective;€and€that€his€pleas€of€guilty€were€not€voluntary€and€knowing.€€Following€ourÐ (x Ðreview,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€dismissing€the€petition.ò òÐ a Ðó óÔ#†XÀ;X XX`6Í#ÔÔ#†¼’Y»XXÀ;š#ÔÔ‡XÀ;X»¼’YÔÓÁÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ ã3 ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼’Y»àXÀ; #ÔÔ‡XÀ;X.¼’YÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ôóó€and€òòThomas€T.Ð ¶ ÐÔ_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð Ÿï ÐÌMichael€S.€Neely,€Riverbend€Maximum€Security€Institution,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€Pro€Se.Ð qÁ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Seth€P.€Kestner,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð C“ ÐVictor€S.€Johnson,€III,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Pamela€S.€Anderson,€Assistant€DistrictÐ ,| ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ô#†¼’Y»XXÀ;Ö#ÔÔ‡XÀ;X»¼’YԀРe ÐÓ§ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼’Y»XXÀ;Œ #ÔÔ‡XÀ;X»¼’YÔÐ ç 7  ÐòòóóÔ#†¼’Y»XXÀ; #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XÀ;X»¼’YÔò òÔ‡X`6 XXXÀ;ÔÌòòÓ  ÓPROCEDURAL€HISTORYÐ »" " ÐÌÓ Óó óóóà  àThe€petitioner,€Michael€S.€Neely,€entered€pleas€of€òònolo€contendereóó€on€March€24,€1998,€toÐ $ß$ Ðtwo€counts€of€rape€of€a€child€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„13„522,€and€wasÐ x%È % Ðsentenced€to€concurrent€fifteen„year€sentences.€€He€filed€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€on€JuneÐ a&±!& Ð3,€1999,€and€this€court€affirmed€the€trial€courtððs€subsequent€summary€dismissal€of€the€petition€asÐ J'š"' Ðbeing€barred€by€the€one„year€statute€of€limitations€established€by€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€sectionÐ 3(ƒ#( Ð40„30„206(b).€€òòSeeóó€òòNeely€v.€Stateóó,€34€S.W.3d€879€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€2000).€€Subsequently,€onÐ )l$) ÐMarch€31,€2004,€the€petitioner€filed€a€forty„eight„page€òòpro€seóó€habeas€corpus€petition€in€the€DavidsonÐ *U%* ÐCounty€Criminal€Court€alleging€he€was€being€illegally€detained€because€the€trial€court€did€not€haveÐ î*>&+ Ðjurisdiction€or€authority€to€order€that€his€sentences€be€served€at€100%;€and,€as€we€understand€hisÐ ×+'', Ðlengthy€complaint,€that€trial€counsel€was€ineffective€and€that€he€is€innocent€of€the€offenses€of€whichÐ À,(- Ðhe€stands€convicted.€€The€court€dismissed€the€petition€without€a€hearing,€determining€that€theÐ ©-ù(.ý ÐÔ_Ôpetition€failed€to€state€a€ground€for€habeas€corpus€relief.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€petitioner€then€filed€a€timely€appealÐ ° Ðto€this€court.Ð ™é ÐÌÓ  Óò òòòANALYSISÐ k» ÐÌó óóóÓ  Óà  àOn€appeal,€the€petitioner€has€continued€the€argument€of€his€petition€that€he€was€illegallyÐ ?  Ðsentenced€to€fifteen€years€at€100%€and€that€trial€counsel€was€ineffective.€€He€has€presented€the€newÐ ( x Ðclaim€that€his€pleas€of€guilty€were€not€knowing€and€voluntary€and,€as€a€consequence,€he€should€beÐ  a Ðpermitted€to€withdraw€them.€€We€will€review€these€claims.Ð ú J ÐÌà  àIt€is€well-established€in€Tennessee€that€the€remedy€provided€by€a€writ€of€habeas€corpus€isÐ Ì   Ðlimited€in€scope€and€may€only€be€invoked€where€the€judgment€is€void€or€the€petitioner's€term€ofÐ µ  Ðimprisonment€has€expired.€€òòState€v.€Ritchieóó,€20€S.W.3d€624,€629€(Tenn.€2000);€òòState€v.€Davenportóó,Ð žî  Ð980€S.W.2d€407,€409€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998).€€A€void,€as€opposed€to€a€voidable,€judgment€hasÐ ‡×  Ðbeen€defined€by€our€supreme€court€as€ð ðone€in€which€the€judgment€is€facially€invalid€because€theÐ pÀ  Ðcourt€did€not€have€the€statutory€authority€to€render€such€judgment.ðð€€òòDykes€v.€Comptonóó,€978€S.W.2dÐ Y©  Ð528,€529€(Tenn.€1998);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòTaylor€v.€Stateóó,€995€S.W.2d€78,€83€(Tenn.€1999).€€€The€judgmentÐ B’ Ðof€a€court€of€general€jurisdiction€is€conclusive€and€presumed€to€be€valid,€and€such€a€judgment€canÐ +{ Ðonly€be€impeached€if€the€record€affirmatively€shows€that€the€rendering€court€was€without€personalÐ d Ðor€subject€matter€jurisdiction.€€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2d€157,€162€(Tenn.€1993).€€Thus,€habeasÐ ýM Ðcorpus€relief€is€available€only€when€ð ðððit€appears€upon€the€face€of€the€judgment€or€the€record€of€theÐ æ6 Ðproceedings€upon€which€the€judgment€is€renderedðð€that€a€convicting€court€was€without€jurisdictionÐ Ï Ðor€authority€to€sentence€a€defendant,€or€that€a€defendant's€sentence€of€imprisonment€.€.€.€has€expired.ðð€Ð ¸ ÐòòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€at€164€(citation€omitted).€€Additionally,€a€sentence€ð ðimposed€in€directÐ ¡ñ Ðcontravention€of€a€statute€.€.€.€is€void€and€illegal.ðð€€òòStephenson€v.€Carltonóó,€28€S.W.3d€910,€911€(Tenn.Ð ŠÚ Ð2000).Ð sà ÐÌà  àTo€obtain€habeas€corpus€relief,€the€petitioner€must€show€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidenceÐ E• Ðthat€his€sentence€is€void€and€not€merely€voidable.€€òòSeeóó€òòDavenportóó,€980€S.W.2d€at€409.€Ð .~ ÐConsequently,€a€petitioner€cannot€collaterally€attack€a€facially€valid€judgment€of€the€trial€court€inÐ g Ða€petition€for€habeas€corpus€relief.€€òòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€at€162.€€The€proper€means€of€challengingÐ  P Ða€facially€valid€judgment€based€on€a€constitutional€violation€is€a€petition€for€post-conviction€relief.Ð é 9 ÐòòLewis€v.€Metro.€Gen.€Sessions€Court€for€Nashvilleóó,€949€S.W.2d€696,€699€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996);Ð Ò!"  ÐòòFredrick€v.€Stateóó,€906€S.W.2d€927,€929€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).Ð »" ! Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àÌÓ Óò òòòÓ  Óóóó óà  àOn€appeal,€the€petitioner€asserts€he€is€entitled€to€habeas€corpus€relief€because€his€sentencesÐ $Ý# Ðare€void€and€his€trial€counsel€was€ineffective,€resulting€in€pleas€of€guilty€which€were€not€knowingÐ v%Æ $ Ðand€voluntary.€€We€begin€by€noting€that€an€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€claim€can€be€raised€onlyÐ _&¯!% Ðin€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€and€not€a€habeas€corpus€petition.€€òòSeeóó€òòPassarella€v.€Stateóó,€891Ð H'˜"& ÐS.W.2d€619,€627€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994);€òòLuttrell€v.€Stateóó,€644€S.W.2d€408,€409€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð 1(#' Ð1982).€€Accordingly,€the€trial€court€was€correct€in€determining€that€this€claim€should€be€dismissedÐ ° Ðwithout€a€hearing.€€As€for€the€corollary€to€this€claim,€that€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€resultedÐ ™é Ðin€pleas€of€guilty€which€were€not€knowing€and€voluntary,€such€claims€cannot€be€raised€in€a€habeasÐ ‚Ò Ðcorpus€petition.€€òòSeeóó€òòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€at€165€(a€ð ðchallenge€to€the€voluntariness€of€the€pleas€doesÐ k» Ðnot€establish€that€the€convictions€based€upon€those€pleas€are€void,€rather€than€voidableðð).€€Ð T¤ ÐÌà  àRegarding€the€claim€that€the€trial€court€could€not€order€that€the€petitionerððs€sentences€beÐ & v Ðserved€at€100%,€as€best€we€can€determine,€he€argues€that€the€sentences€are€illegal€because€TennesseeÐ  _ ÐCode€Annotated€section€40„35„501(i),׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€mandating€that€child€rape€sentences€be€served€at€100%€andÐ ø H Ðpursuant€to€which€he€says€he€was€sentenced,€applies€to€offenses€which€occurred€on€or€after€July€1,Ð á 1  Ð1995,€but€the€offenses€of€which€he€was€convicted€occurred€in€June€1995.€€Thus,€by€this€argument,Ð Ê   Ðhis€sentences€violate€the€òòex€post€factoóó€clause€of€the€United€States€Constitution.€€Ð ³  ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner€is€correct€in€asserting€that€the€relevant€part€of€this€statute€provides€that€certainÐ …Õ  Ðoffenses€must€be€served€at€100%,€less€sentence€credits€earned€and€retained:Ð n¾  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(i)(1)€There€shall€be€no€release€eligibility€for€a€personÐ @ Ðcommitting€an€offense,€on€or€after€July€1,€1995,€that€is€enumerated€inÐ )y Ðsubdivision€(i)(2).€€Such€person€shall€serve€one€hundred€percentÐ b Ð(100%)€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€court€less€sentence€creditsÐ ûK Ðearned€and€retained.€€However,€no€sentence€reduction€creditsÐ ä4 Ðauthorized€by€ðð€41-21-236,€or€any€other€provision€of€law,€shallÐ Í Ðoperate€to€reduce€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€court€by€more€thanÐ ¶ Ðfifteen€percent€(15%).Пï` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(2)€The€offenses€to€which€the€provisions€of€subdivision€(i)(1)Ð qÁ Ðapply€are:ÐZª` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à.€.€.€.€Ð,|` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(I)€Rape€of€a€child[.]ÐþN` x` x ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501(i)(1),€(2)€(2003).€€Ð Ð!   ÐÌà  àFocusing€on€this€statute,€with€its€effective€date€after€the€dates€of€the€offenses€to€which€heÐ ¢#ò" Ðpled€guilty,€the€petitioner€argues€that€he€should€have€been€sentenced€under€the€1989€SentencingÐ ‹$Û# ÐReform€Act€which€would€result€in€his€sentences€being€served€as€a€Range€I€offender€rather€than€aÐ t%Ä $ Ðchild€rapist.€€However,€this€argument€ignores€subsection€(i)(3),€which€explains€that€even€prior€to€JulyÐ ]&­!% Ð1,€1995,€child€rapists€were€required€to€serve€their€entire€sentences:€€ð ðNothing€in€this€subsection€(i)Ð ° Ðshall€be€construed€as€affecting,€amending€or€altering€the€provisions€of€ðð€39„13„523,€which€requiresÐ ™é Ðchild€rapists€and€multiple€rapists€to€serve€the€entire€sentence€imposed€by€the€court€undiminished€byÐ ‚Ò Ðany€sentence€reduction€credits.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501(i)(3)€(2003).€€Thus,€sentences€forÐ k» Ðchild€rapes€occurring€before€July€1,€1995,€also€were€served€at€100%.€€The€petitioner€entered€his€pleasÐ T¤ Ðof€guilty€to€the€violation€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„13„522,€which€established€childÐ =  Ðrape€as€a€Class€A€felony.€€Although€the€statute€was€amended€in€1997,€the€subsection€setting€childÐ & v Ðrape€as€an€offense€became€effective€in€1992,€three€years€before€his€crimes.€€Likewise,€TennesseeÐ  _ ÐCode€Annotated€section€39„13„523,€which€the€petitioner€acknowledges€only€in€passing,€defines€aÐ ø H Ðð ðchild€rapistðð€as€ð ða€person€convicted€one€(1)€or€more€times€of€rape€of€a€child€as€defined€by€ðð€39„13„Ð á 1  Ð522,ðð€and€requires€that€such€an€offender€serve€100%€of€his€sentence:Ð Ê   ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àNotwithstanding€any€other€provision€of€law€to€the€contrary,Ð œì  Ða€multiple€rapist€or€a€child€rapist,€as€defined€in€subsection€(a),€shallÐ …Õ  Ðbe€required€to€serve€the€entire€sentence€imposed€by€the€courtÐ n¾  Ðundiminished€by€any€sentence€reduction€credits€such€person€may€beÐ W§  Ðeligible€for€or€earn.€€A€multiple€rapist€or€a€child€rapist€shall€beÐ @ Ðpermitted€to€earn€any€credits€for€which€such€person€is€eligible€andÐ )y Ðsuch€credits€may€be€used€for€the€purpose€of€increased€privileges,Ð b Ðreduced€security€classification,€or€for€any€purpose€other€than€theÐ ûK Ðreduction€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€court.Ðä4` x` x ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„523(b)€(2003).€€This€subsection€became€effective€on€July€1,€1992,€as€didÐ ¶ Ðsubsection€(c),€which€provides€that€nothing€in€the€parole€and€release€eligibility€section€of€the€codeÐ Ÿï Ðoperates€to€shorten€the€sentence€of€a€child€rapist:Ð ˆØ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€provisions€of€title€40,€chapter€35,€part€5,€relative€toÐ Zª Ðrelease€eligibility€status€and€parole€shall€not€apply€to€or€authorize€theÐ C“ Ðrelease€of€a€multiple€rapist€or€child€rapist,€as€defined€in€subsectionÐ ,| Ð(a),€prior€to€service€of€the€entire€sentence€imposed€by€the€court.Ðe` x` x ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„523(c)€(2003).Ð ç 7 ÐÌà  àIn€sum,€the€petitioner€was€convicted€of€two€counts€of€rape€of€a€child€under€Tennessee€CodeÐ ¹" ! ÐAnnotated€section€39„13„522.€€Pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„13„523,€he€isÐ ¢#ò" Ðrequired€to€serve€100%€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court.€€Nothing€on€the€face€of€theÐ ‹$Û# Ðjudgment€forms€indicates€that€the€trial€court€imposed€an€illegal€sentence,€nor€that€it€was€withoutÐ t%Ä $ Ðjurisdiction€or€authority€to€impose€sentence.€€Thus,€the€petitionerððs€claims€did€not€warrant€a€hearingÐ ]&­!% Ðbefore€dismissal.Ð F'–"& ÐÌÓ  Óò òòòÐ  )h$( ÐCONCLUSIONÐ ° ÐÌóóó óÓ  Óà  àBased€on€the€foregoing€authorities€and€reasoning,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€courtÐ „Ô Ðdismissing€the€habeas€corpus€petition.Ð m½ Ðà  àÔ#†XÀ;X XX`6Ÿ #ÔÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ( x Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE