ÿWPC —YUÐ':[J/i?å"óÿÓ‚}¶ nk©dÝQJ-{‘‚–ÉT›íCÇŒÄ%Òèqm9­³‰+²þ‹¨ TH0žëÙ–k–¤­å6s¼»eîÇÿ”N, Gù|/ÀÔó«lÝv@Ã1B^ºØî7Ô˜˜tòÿÁ`Ä)s–&v½·Ú<îúìI€ïLCŒ7z¤N/Ó|^¯°c'‡ŠƒFÁ_µ‚ƶ/zNòRâA´µªÿÔ±øy âžf¥ëŒ–”7³8œò ªcBü鋬îcBc¿g!çþ¤ïâöª>”ä:¸ßárÒ¢Üg Ê&’\‡›hÛÈÑ0ëÇoP(™1g¤†$šôU™º¹ªÛ6_™ˆ£Ðj®1Ãé…Óý–(ú§µnþ Q6!‹½l$pYÊíü0´~¤(¤& ö™ËÇ3"/+‹iÍ3Fë×ê(vI­‡ ÓŽi§ß±Átq{aÒ¬4^h€±@ÂGèd Ì(Üä&e†ÂM¥¤Š_üçšœKϨ*££ôW‡tÔ?|”ªuB†‡ÙÜÜWèGÚ5:£ ¤@)*®èL g ½[âȗ䕽kXH±â^¶x㨭¦ ÿkûY°+<Â:0„ƒr&ytb#É\ %% UN+ 0ˆy UN ^ O w[ z_ ÒÙ 4« ¿ Î mÐ Æç Æ­ ÆsÆ99NÿÿÿEb 0ë     Böö 0¤ D3· D-ê 0K ASbƵ 0¤{ 0D A«c˜\\IB01S01\CLERK4NASÒV,,,,ÒV0»(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularŽˆ—/Ï  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptlz/ê:i¢×+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2ýÒ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€‹‘»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô²,ò»»Ô d(|3@®$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€‹‘»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3@®$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€‹‘»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€‹‘»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼‹‘»»»ÔÑ8€ÎGXXdé»»d8Ñà@hhìàÔ‡îd&‹‘ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@gg$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼‹‘»îîd& #ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€August€13,€2003Ð öF ÐÔ‡XÎGX»¼‹‘ÔÌò òÔ#†¼‹‘»XXÎG #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€DOYLE€GILBERT€NEWSOMòòóóÔ‡XÎGX»¼‹‘Ôó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Bedford€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€15024€€€€€€Lee€Russell,€JudgeÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2002„01696„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€December€23,€Ô_Ô2003Ô_ÔÐ ŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X8NXXXÎGÔThe€defendant,€Doyle€Gilbert€Newsom,€was€convicted€by€a€Bedford€County€jury€of€fifth€offenseÐ V¦  Ðdriving€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant,€driving€on€a€revoked€driverððs€license,€and€violation€ofÐ ? Ðthe€implied€consent€law.€€He€received€sentences€of€six€years€at€60%€incarceration€as€a€career€Ô_ÔD.U.I.Ô_ÔÐ (x Ðoffender,€and€11€months,€29€days€for€driving€on€a€revoked€license.€€In€this€appeal€the€defendantÐ a Ðclaims€that:€(1)€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€Ô_ÔD.U.I.Ô_Ô€conviction€because€the€testimonyÐ úJ Ðof€an€accomplice€was€not€sufficiently€corroborated;€(2)€he€was€improperly€sentenced€to€11€months,Ð ã3 Ð29€days€for€driving€on€a€revoked€license;€and€(3)€the€prior€judgments€of€conviction€are€invalid.€€WeÐ Ì Ðfind€no€merit€to€any€of€these€contentions.€€Therefore,€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court€are€affirmed.Ð µ ÐÔ#†XÎGXXX8NÉ#ÔÔ#†¼‹‘»XXÎGœ#ÔÔ‡XÎGX»¼‹‘ÔÌÓ½ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgments€of€the€Trial€Court€are€Affirmed.ó óÐ pÀ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼‹‘»àXÎG, #ÔÔ‡XÎGX.¼‹‘ÔJerry€L.€Smith,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ôóó€and€òòDavid€G.Ð C“ ÐHayes,€J.óó,€joined.Ð ,| ÐÌMichael€J.€Collins,€Assistant€Public€Defender,€Ô_ÔShelbyvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€DoyleÐ þN ÐGilbert€Newsom.Ð ç 7  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€David€H.€Ô_ÔFindleyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð ¹" " ÐMike€Ô_ÔMcCownÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Michael€Ô_ÔRandlesÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ ¢#ò# ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ‹$Û$ ÐÓÍ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼‹‘»XXÎGü #ÔÔ‡XÎGX»¼‹‘ÔÐ ]&­!& ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼‹‘»XXÎGs #ÔÔ‡XÎGX»¼‹‘ÔÓ  ÓòòÔ‡X8NXXXÎGÔà@ÃÃ!ìàFactual€BackgroundóóˆÐ 0(€#( ÐÌà  àAt€approximately€8:00€p.m.€on€June€8,€2001,€a€Tennessee€State€Trooper€and€emergencyÐ *R%* Ðmedical€personnel€responded€to€the€scene€of€a€single„vehicle€accident€on€Simms€Springs€Road€inÐ ë*;&+ ÐBedford€County.€€The€responders€found€the€defendant€lying€injured€next€to€the€driverððs€side€of€aÐ Ô+$', Ðtruck€that€had€crashed€into€a€large€tree€stump€when€the€driver€had€failed€to€negotiate€a€curve.€Ð ½, (- ÐAlthough€seriously€injured,€the€defendant€was€conscious,€and€he€refused€to€provide€a€blood€sampleÐ ¦-ö(.ý ÐÔ_Ôfor€alcohol€testing.€€The€defendant€also€denied€being€intoxicated€and€being€the€driver€of€the€truck.€Ð ° ÐThe€state€trooper€smelled€alcohol€coming€from€the€defendantððs€person.Ð ™é ÐÌà  àA€Mr.€Ronnie€Campbell€was€also€found€at€the€accident€scene.€€Mr.€Campbell€had€injuriesÐ k» Ðconsistent€with€his€body€having€slid€across€asphalt.€€Campbell€said€he€was€the€owner€of€the€truck,Ð T¤ Ðand€he€admitted€he€had€been€drinking€shortly€before€the€crash,€but€he€stated€the€defendant€had€beenÐ =  Ðdriving€at€the€time€of€the€crash.Ð & v ÐÌà  àAfter€the€defendant€was€released€from€the€hospital,€law€enforcement€authorities€arrested€theÐ ø H Ðdefendant€for€D.U.I.€€At€the€time€of€his€arrest,€the€defendant€was€found€hiding€in€some€trees€behindÐ á 1  Ðhis€brotherððs€house.Ð Ê   ÐÌà  àAt€the€trial,€Mr.€Campbell€testified€that€he€and€the€defendant€had€been€drinking€earlier€in€theÐ œì  Ðafternoon€of€June€8,€2001.€€Campbell€eventually€drove€his€truck€to€a€convenience€store€to€buy€gas.€Ð …Õ  ÐAt€that€time,€the€defendant€asked€to€drive€Campbellððs€truck.€€Campbell€acquiesced€and€gave€theÐ n¾  Ðdefendant€the€ignition€keys.€€As€the€defendant€drove€the€pair€down€Simms€Springs€Road,€theÐ W§  Ðdefendant€attempted€to€round€a€curve€at€too€great€a€speed.€€This€action€threw€Campbell€against€theÐ @ Ðpassenger€door,€which€opened,€causing€Campbell€to€fall€out€and€slide€across€the€asphalt.€€The€truckÐ )y Ðcrashed€into€a€large€tree€stump.€€Campbell€found€the€injured€defendant€lying€on€the€ground€outsideÐ b Ðthe€driverððs€door.€€Campbell€admitted€that€both€he€and€the€defendant€were€intoxicated€at€the€timeÐ ûK Ðof€the€crash.€€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àDr.€Robert€Westover€testified€that€he€treated€the€defendant€upon€his€arrival€at€the€hospital.€Ð ¶ ÐThe€defendantððs€blood€alcohol€level€at€that€time€was€.27.Ð Ÿï ÐÌà  àOn€behalf€of€the€defendant,€Ms.€Tracy€Carmen€testified€she€had€witnessed€Campbell€and€theÐ qÁ Ðdefendant€leaving€the€convenience€store€where€Campbell€stated€he€and€the€defendant€had€gone€toÐ Zª Ðpurchase€gas.€€She€stated€that€Campbell€was€driving€the€truck€as€he€and€the€defendant€left€the€store.€Ð C“ ÐMs.€Carmen€stated€that€upon€hearing€the€sirens€of€the€emergency€vehicles€responsing€to€the€crash,Ð ,| Ðshe€followed€the€sound€and€arrived€at€the€crash€site.€€There€she€saw€the€defendant€lying€on€theÐ e Ðpassenger€side€of€the€truck€along€with€his€cigarettes€and€lighter.€€Ð þN ÐÌà@6 6 ìàòòSufficiency€of€Corroboration€of€Accomplice€TestimonyóóˆÐ Ð!   ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€there€was€insufficient€evidence€to€corroborate€the€testimony€ofÐ ¢#ò" ÐRonnie€Campbell,€and€thus€his€conviction€cannot€stand€as€a€matter€of€law.€€D.U.I.€first,€second€andÐ ‹$Û# Ðthird€offenses€are€misdemeanors€punishable€by€a€maximum€sentence€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„Ð t%Ä $ Ðnine€days.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„403(a)(1);€òòsee€alsoóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„110€(declaringÐ ]&­!% Ðoffenses€whose€maximum€punishment€is€less€than€one€year€of€imprisonment€to€be€misdemeanors).€Ð F'–"& ÐThe€accomplice€corroboration€rule€does€not€apply€in€misdemeanors.€€òòWarden€v.€Stateóó,€381€S.W.2dÐ /(#' Ð247,€248€(Tenn.€1964);€òòTruss€v.€Stateóó,€81€Tenn.€311€(1884);òòóó€òòPalmer€v.€Stateóó,€475€S.W.2d€189,€194Ð )h$( Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1971).€€However,€the€legislature€has€declared€a€fourth€or€subsequent€convictionÐ *Q%) Ðfor€D.U.I.€to€be€a€Class€E€felony€which€causes€a€maximum€penalty€of€six€(6)€years€imprisonment.€Ð ê*:&* ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€55„10„403(a)(1),€40„35„111(b)(5);€òòState€v.€Samuel€Lee€Partinóó,€No.€E2002„Ð Ó+#'+ Ð00094„CCA„R3„CD,€à ¸ à2002€WL€31528552,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€Nov.€15,€2002);Ð ° ÐòòState€v.€Ronnie€Lamar€Evansóó,€No.€E2000„00327„CCA„R9„CO,€2001€WL€501414,€at€*3€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð ™é ÐApp.€at€Knoxville,€May€11,€2001).€€Because€the€instant€case€involves€a€fifth€offense€D.U.I.€theÐ ‚Ò Ðaccomplice€corroboration€rule€applies.Ð k» ÐÌà  àAs€our€supreme€court€has€recently€reiterated,€ð ð[i]n€Tennessee,€a€conviction€may€not€be€basedÐ =  Ðsolely€upon€the€uncorroborated€testimony€of€an€accomplice.ðð€€òòState€v.€Shawóó,€37€S.W.3d€900,€903Ð & v Ð(Tenn.€2001).€€ð ðAn€accomplice€is€one€who€knowingly,€voluntarily,€and€with€common€intent€unitesÐ  _ Ðwith€the€principal€offender€in€the€commission€of€a€crime.ðð€€òòState€v.€Allenóó,€976€S.W.2d€661,€666Ð ø H Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€€The€general€test€is€whether€the€accomplice€could€be€indicted€for€theÐ á 1  Ðoffense€charged€against€the€defendant.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óóÐ Ê   ÐÌà  àTo€corroborate€the€testimony€of€an€accomplice:Ð œì  Ðà8  à[T]here€must€be€some€fact€testified€to,€entirely€independent€of€the€accompliceððsÐ …Õ  Ðtestimony,€which,€taken€by€itself,€leads€to€the€inference,€not€only€that€a€crime€hasÐ n¾  Ðbeen€committed,€but€also€that€the€defendant€is€implicated€in€it;€and€this€independentÐ W§  Ðcorroborative€testimony€must€also€include€some€fact€establishing€the€defendantððsÐ @ Ðidentity.€€This€corroborative€evidence€may€be€direct€or€entirely€circumstantial,€andÐ )y Ðit€need€not€be€adequate,€in€and€of€itself,€to€support€a€conviction;€it€is€sufficient€toÐ b Ðmeet€the€requirements€of€the€rule€if€it€fairly€and€legitimately€tends€to€connect€theÐ ûK Ðdefendant€with€the€commission€of€the€crime€charged.€€òòóóIt€is€not€necessary€that€theÐ ä4 Ðcorroboration€extend€to€every€part€of€the€accompliceððs€evidence.€The€corroborationÐ Í Ðneed€not€be€conclusive,€but€it€is€sufficient€if€this€evidence,€of€itself,€tends€to€connectÐ ¶ Ðthe€defendant€with€the€commission€of€the€offense,€although€the€evidence€is€slight€andÐ Ÿï Ðentitled,€when€standing€alone,€to€but€little€consideration.€òòЈØÐ Ð  ÐÌState€v.€Gayloróó,€862€S.W.2d€546,€552€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992)€(quoting€òòHawkins€v.€Stateóó,€4€Tenn.Ð Zª ÐCrim.€App.€121,€133„34,€469€S.W.2d€515,€520€(1971)).€€ð ðOnly€slight€circumstances€are€required€toÐ C“ Ðcorroborate€an€accompliceððs€testimony.ðð€€òòState€v.€Griffisóó,€964€S.W.2d€577,€589€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð ,| Ð1997).Ð e ÐÌà  àAs€noted€by€the€State€in€its€brief,€there€were€two€questions€for€the€jury€in€this€case:€(1)€wasÐ ç 7 Ðthe€defendant€intoxicated;€and€(2)€was€the€defendant€driving.€€As€to€the€former,€Ronnie€CampbellððsÐ Ð!   Ðtestimony€was€corroborated€by€Dr.€Robert€Westover,€who€testified€that€the€defendantððs€bloodÐ ¹" ! Ðalcohol€was€.27€upon€his€admittance€to€the€hospital€following€the€accident.Ð ¢#ò" ÐÌà  àAs€to€the€latter,€Campbellððs€testimony€that€the€defendant€was€driving€and€that€he€was€aÐ t%Ä $ Ðpassenger€and€fell€out€of€the€car€just€prior€to€the€accident€was€corroborated€by€Trooper€BlackwellððsÐ ]&­!% Ðtestimony€that€the€only€injury€suffered€by€Campbell€was€ð ðroad€rashðð€on€his€back€and€shoulders,Ð F'–"& Ðwhich€he€testified€occurs€when€someone€ð ðslides€across€an€asphalt€roadway.ððÐ /(#' ÐÌà  àAdditionally,€both€Trooper€Blackwell€and€EMT€Captain€Brian€Bruce€testified€that€theÐ *Q%) Ðdefendant€was€found€on€the€ground€just€outside€the€driverððs€side€door.Ð ê*:&* ÐÐ Ó+#'+ Ðà  àFinally,€both€Trooper€Blackwell€and€Deputy€Williams€testified€that€when€they€went€to€theÐ ° Ðresidence€of€the€defendantððs€brother,€looking€for€the€defendant,€he€was€found€hiding€in€the€woodsÐ ™é Ðbehind€the€house.€€Guilt€can€be€inferred€from€a€defendantððs€flight.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòState€v.€Kendricksóó,€947Ð ‚Ò ÐS.W.2d€875,€886€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996)€(inferring€guilt€from€defendantððs€flight,€in€combinationÐ k» Ðwith€the€other€facts€and€circumstances€in€the€case);€òòState€v.€Larry€Hughesóó,€No.€55,€1990€WL€113803,Ð T¤ Ðat€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville€Aug.€10,€1990)€(holding€that€defendantððs€flight€into€backyardÐ =  Ðof€his€home€after€officers€approached,€such€could€be€considered€for€purposes€of€corroboratingÐ & v Ðaccomplice€testimony).€€There€was€sufficient€corroboration€to€support€Mr.€Campbellððs€testimonyÐ  _ Ðand€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð ø H ÐÌÌà@Ü Ü ìàòòThe€Defendantððs€Eleven€Month,€Twenty„Nine€Day€ˆÐ ³  Ðà@  ìàSentence€for€Driving€on€a€Revoked€LicenseóóˆÐ œì  ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€complains€on€appeal€that€he€should€have€received€a€maximum€sentence€ofÐ n¾  Ðonly€six€months€for€his€conviction€for€driving€on€a€revoked€license.€€A€six„month€maximum€sentenceÐ W§  Ðis€available€only€for€first€offenders€of€the€law€prohibiting€driving€on€a€revoked€or€suspended€license.€Ð @ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„50„504(a)(1).€€In€this€case,€the€presentence€report€reveals€that€in€NovemberÐ )y Ð1997,€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€driving€on€a€revoked€license€in€Marshall€County,€Tennessee.€Ð b ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€55„50„504(a)(2)€provides€that€a€second€or€subsequent€convictionÐ ûK Ðfor€driving€on€a€revoked€license€is€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€The€maximum€sentence€for€a€Class€AÐ ä4 Ðmisdemeanor€is€generally€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days,€and€a€fine€of€not€more€than€$2,500.€Ð Í ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(e)(1).€€In€view€of€the€fact€that€the€conviction€for€driving€on€a€revokedÐ ¶ Ðlicense€in€this€case€is€the€defendantððs€second,€and€in€view€of€the€defendantððs€extensive€criminalÐ Ÿï Ðrecord,€a€sentence€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€is€amply€supported€by€the€record.€€ThisÐ ˆØ Ðissue€lacks€merit.Ð qÁ ÐÌà@++ìàòòValidity€of€Prior€D.U.€I.€ConvictionsóóˆÐ C“ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€his€prior€D.U.I.€judgments€are€invalid€on€their€face€because€heÐ e Ðwas€not€advised,€at€the€time€those€judgments€were€entered,€that€they€could€be€used€to€enhance€anyÐ þN Ðsentence€he€might€receive€as€a€result€of€future€D.U.I.€convictions.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„Ð ç 7 Ð403(g)(1).€€Accordingly,€he€contends€that€he€should€only€be€sentenced€for€D.U.I.,€firstòòóó€offense.Ð Ð!   ÐÌà  àThe€supreme€court€has€held€that€ð ða€facially€valid,€unreversed€judgment€in€a€court€withÐ ¢#ò" Ðjurisdiction€over€the€subject€matter€and€the€person€cannot€be€collaterally€attacked€in€a€subsequentÐ ‹$Û# Ðproceeding€except€by€the€authorized€routes€of€attack.ðð€€òòState€v.€McClintockóó,€732€S.W.2d€268,€271Ð t%Ä $ Ð(Tenn.€1987).€€Most€recently,€this€Court€reiterated€that€holding€in€the€very€context€the€petitionerÐ ]&­!% Ðbrings€now,€finding€that€ð ððð[55„10„403(g)(1)]€does€not€require€that€a€defendant€have€received€suchÐ F'–"& Ðnotice€prior€to€being€sentenced€on€a€second€or€subsequent€offense.ðððð€€òòState€v.€Poseyóó,€99€S.W.3d€141,Ð /(#' Ð145€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2002)€(quoting€òòState€v.€George€S.€Mercieróó,€No.€02C01„9404„CC„00066,Ð )h$( Ð1994€WL€568345,€at€*1€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,€Oct.€19,€1994)).€€This€Court€concluded€inÐ *Q%) Ðâ âòòPoseyóó€that€failure€to€adhere€to€55„10„403(g)€does€not€render€prior€judgments€invalid.€€òòPoseyóó,€99Ð ê*:&* ÐS.W.3d€at€145.€€Because€a€challenge€in€the€most€recent€D.U.I.€proceeding€of€the€validity€of€priorÐ ° ÐD.U.I.€convictions€is€inappropriate€we€find€this€issue€to€be€without€merit.Ð ™é Ðâ âÌÌà@ii%ìàòòCONCLUSIONóóˆÐ T¤ ÐÌÔ#†XÎGXXX8Nÿ #Ôà  àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€we€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court.€€Ô‡X8NXXXÎGÔÐ & v ÐòòÌóóÔ#†XÎGXXX8NËB#ÔÔ#†¼‹‘»XXÎGÑ #ÔÔ€XÎGX»¼‹‘ÔÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð œì  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGE