ÿWPCR ÁiÇ竽â¢Eã}¾=Ñ”êS1ŽˆvÓÂLxÔdÊSO?†ä](åf°+Œ4–œUhØëO œ…k„jÎI£hƒnúߊf lŠ:¨Ð÷î”oÈœ ’º *’ ,ùZj·ïÛAq§oÎ ƒÝï²(—‹öÇc%ÈTÈŠ•ŽCºF°êxTuPšç‚B$t0%w¤B)#+&ñä¨g³k7ADÚ«Ídígx©d?•ÆY7ɸOسõ?+¦ßæ=p‹Ç\GÁº¶»“˜‚´•!Kñ·“(¿œ¯3=Wš[\{õ¸8Ú\¾Êþ,M¦k¿ÅÇ•;¯¹`_$0Þ–g+«zÙiËš©Ó**,‹HqTø Ûr2¤› ¡#g£ÅÈ[C€îö ÿ¾Ï¦¢K‚­«h;möˆÏ\û?:¥ àì¢ÊóH6*Ž›êäÕ;ígèQáƒúÉB³4Ü«¼L¥–%¢¾Üöû뇃EÞPn¬ÝŸö¢ý¬“ìDÞG‚¸Q”oî³Ç¾è£U+㈠5íuà—°Ãåï*Ú&/= 6E’6C¿=[®Ð (”ŒFH4G'ôÇDê ,];4ˆƒmµ¥+B¾»b#Á\ % # 0ˆ+ UN³ ^  w z Ò‹ 4] q € m‚ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë L±Ný 0DÿÿECCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCbEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 0ëMMMM B88 0¤U D5ù D-. 0K[[ AS¦Æù 0¤¿ 0Dc A«§˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0» (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular4¯-s  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptYo†)ê:i¢×+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 BÝ ƒRû¿$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôðõò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€companion€did€not€appear€at€the€sentencing€hearing.€€The€defendant€testified€about€his€hospitalization,Ð ° Ðbut€she€was€uninformed€about€the€nature€and€extent€of€his€injuries.€(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-(|G2û¿$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Kí»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôðõò»»Ô d(|3Éi$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Kí»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Éi$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Kí»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Kí»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Kí»»»ÔÑ8€aXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îV KíÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@õõ%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼Kí»îîV #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€October€1,€2002Ð üL ÐÔ‡XaX»¼KíÔÌò òÔ#†¼Kí»XXa.#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€Ô_ÔADRIANNEÔ_Ô€ELIZABETH€Ô_ÔNOLESÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡XaX»¼KíÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔHaywoodÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€4753€€€€€€Ô_ÔClayburnÔ_Ô€L.€Ô_ÔPeeplesÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2002„01558„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€December12,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓPursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„13„213(a)(1)€(1997),€the€defendant,€Ô_ÔAdrianneÔ_ÔÐ xÈ  ÐElizabeth€Ô_ÔNolesÔ_Ô,€was€charged€with€vehicular€homicide€by€recklessness€in€the€Ô_ÔHaywoodÔ_Ô€CountyÐ d´ ÐCircuit€Court.€€She€submitted€a€guilty€plea€to€the€charge,€a€Class€C€felony,€and€agreed€to€have€theÐ P  Ðtrial€court€determine€the€length€and€manner€of€service€of€her€sentence.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,Ð <Œ Ðthe€trial€court€imposed€a€three„year€sentence€to€be€served€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€Ð (x ÐAggrieved€of€the€trial€courtððs€rejection€of€any€sentencing€alternative€to€incarceration,€she€appeals.€Ð d ÐWe€affirm.Ô#†¼Kí»XXaî#ÔÔ‡XaX»¼KíÔÐ P ÐÓnÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€is€Affirmed€and€Remanded.ó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Kí»àXaÇ#ÔÔ‡XaX.¼KíÔJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Wellesóó€andÐ ° ÐòòAlan€E.€Glenn,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð œì ÐÌTom€Ô_ÔCriderÔ_Ô,€Trenton,€Tennessee€(at€trial),€and€Joyce€Diane€Ô_ÔBlountÔ_Ô,€Trenton,€Tennessee€(on€appeal),Ð tÄ Ðfor€the€Appellant,€Ô_ÔAdrianneÔ_Ô€Elizabeth€Ô_ÔNolesÔ_Ô.Ð `° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€John€H.€Ô_ÔBledsoeÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€andÐ 8!ˆ  ÐGarry€G.€Brown,€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð $"t! ÐÓv ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Kí»XXa¥ #ÔÔ‡XaX»¼KíÔÐ ü#L# ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼Kí»XXa: #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XaX»¼KíÔà  àà ` àThe€conviction€stems€from€events€of€October€14,€2001,€that€unfolded€on€InterstateÐ Ô%$!% Ð40€in€Ô_ÔHaywoodÔ_Ô€County.€€Based€upon€facts€gleaned€from€the€Ô_ÔpresentenceÔ_Ô€report€and€testimonyÐ À&"& Ðintroduced€in€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendant,€who€was€20€years€old,€was€driving€west€onÐ ¬'ü"' ÐInterstate€40,€accompanied€by€a€male€friend€and€her€four„year„old€son.€€She€was€traveling€fromÐ ˜(è#( ÐNashville€to€Arkansas€and€was€approximately€30€minutes€west€of€Nashville€when€a€car€pulled€upÐ „)Ô$) Ðbehind€her,€shined€its€high€beams€into€the€defendantððs€car,€then€pulled€around€and€in€front€of€theÐ p*À%* Ðdefendantððs€car€and€braked.€€She€was€initially€angered€and€later€somewhat€frightened€as€the€two€carsÐ \+¬&+ Ðâ âjockeyed€in€front€of€each€other,€sometimes€reaching€speeds€of€90€miles€per€hour.€€At€least€once,€theÐ H,˜',ý ÐÔ_Ôother€car,€which€was€occupied€by€two€young€Hispanic€males,€disappeared€but€after€a€half€hour€or€so,Ð ° Ðit€reappeared€behind€the€defendantððs€car€with€high€beams€activated.Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àà ` àThis€ð ðcat„and„mouseðð€activity€continued€until€the€cars€reached€Haywood€County,Ð tÄ Ðwhere€the€occupants€of€the€other€car€began€throwing€objects€at€the€defendantððs€car.€€At€some€point,Ð `° Ðaccording€to€the€defendant,€an€object€was€thrown€through€her€car€window.€€As€she€attempted€to€reachÐ L œ Ðfor€the€unknown€object,€the€other€car€pulled€in€front€of€her€and€braked.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendant€had€no€recollection€of€losing€control€of€her€car,€crossing€the€InterstateÐ  ` Ðmedian,€or€colliding€with€the€east„bound€vehicle€driven€by€the€victim,€Joseph€Cooper.€€Mr.€CooperÐ ü L  Ðdied€from€injuries€sustained€in€the€accident.€€The€defendant€and€her€male€companion€wereÐ è 8  Ðhospitalized€but€recovered€from€their€injuries.€€The€defendantððs€child,€riding€in€the€rear€seat€of€theÐ Ô$  Ðdefendantððs€car,€was€uninjured.Ð À  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€post„accident€blood€test€performed€on€the€defendant€was€negative€for€drugs€orÐ ˜è  Ðalcohol.€€Although€the€defendant€admitted€that€she€had€used€cocaine€two€days€before€the€accident,Ð „Ô  Ðthe€record€contains€no€proof€that€her€October€14€actions€were€influenced€by€the€drug.Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€victimððs€mother€and€first€cousin€offered€ð ðvictimÐ H˜ Ðimpactðð€testimony.€€The€victim€was€an€industrious€young€man€who€was€devoted€to€his€mother,€hisÐ 4„ Ðfour„year„old€daughter,€and€other€members€of€his€family.€€Understandably,€his€loss€was€grievous€toÐ  p Ðthe€family,€especially€to€his€young€daughter.€€Ð  \ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendant€testified€that€she€deeply€regretted€her€actions€on€October€14€thatÐ ä4 Ðresulted€in€the€loss€of€the€victimððs€life.€€She€admitted€that€she€had€driven€at€speeds€up€to€90€milesÐ Ð  Ðper€hour€but€denied€that€she€had€been€weaving€in€and€out€of€traffic,€as€was€alleged€in€the€presentenceÐ ¼  Ðreport.€€She€admitted€that€she€could€have€left€the€Interstate€at€any€one€of€a€number€of€exit€ramps€andÐ ¨ø Ðthat€she€declined€to€do€so.€€She€did€not€know€the€men€in€the€other€car.€€She€gave€no€thought€to€theÐ ”ä Ðrisks€posed€to€her€son€in€the€rear€seat.€€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€presentence€report€revealed€that€the€defendant€began€using€marijuana€and€cocaineÐ X ¨ Ðwhen€she€was€thirteen€years€old.€€She€had€undergone€treatment,€including€residential€treatment€inÐ D!” Ðthe€past.€€She€asked€the€court€to€avail€her€the€opportunity€to€enter€an€eighteen„month€treatmentÐ 0"€  Ðprogram€that€offered€drug€rehabilitation€and€parenting€skills€education.€€She€had€thoroughlyÐ #l! Ðresearched€the€availability€and€aptness€of€the€specific€program€that€she€described€and€testified€thatÐ $X" Ðshe€would€be€accepted€into€the€program,€if€the€court€permitted,€and€that€she€would€acquire€aÐ ô$D # ÐGraduate€Equivalency€Diploma€while€in€the€program.€€Her€great€aunt€and€great€uncle€testified€andÐ à%0!$ Ðconfirmed€the€tentative€arrangements€in€the€treatment€program.€€They€assured€the€court€that€theÐ Ì&"% Ðdefendant€was€genuinely€remorseful€about€the€victimððs€death,€saying€that€she€had€expressedÐ ¸'#& Ðanguished€empathy€for€the€victim;€he,€like€her,€was€the€parent€of€a€four„year„old€child.€Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€presentence€report€also€revealed€that€the€defendant,€at€age€18,€was€convicted€inÐ |*Ì%) ÐArkansas€of€ð ðspeeding€(50€in€a€40€MPH€zone)ðð€and€driving€without€a€driverððs€license.€€At€age€17,Ð h+¸&* Ðshe€was€convicted€€in€Williamson€County,€Tennessee€of€€ð ðspeeding€(69€in€40€MPH€zone).ðð€€TheÐ ° Ðdefendantððs€juvenile€record€consisted€of€an€adjudication€of€shoplifting.€Ð œì ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€trial€court€imposed€the€Class€C€felony,€Range€I€€minimum€sentence€of€three€years.€Ð tÄ ÐòòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(3)€(1997).€€It€ordered€the€entire€sentence€served€in€confinement.€Ð `° ÐOn€appeal,€the€defendant€limits€her€grievance€to€the€trial€courtððs€rejection€of€alternative€sentencing.€Ð L œ ÐFollowing€our€review,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€order€of€incarceration.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àà ` àBefore€we€begin€our€analysis,€we€note€that€no€transcript€of€the€defendantððs€pleaÐ  ` Ðsubmission€hearing€appears€in€the€record.€€A€plea„submission€hearing€transcript€would€haveÐ ü L  Ðcontained€a€factual€basis€for€the€court€accepting€the€guilty€plea.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(f).€€€ð ðWeÐ è 8  Ðhave€repeatedly€held€that€failure€to€include€the€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing€in€the€recordÐ Ô$  Ðprohibits€this€court€from€conducting€a€meaningful€òòde€novoóó€review€of€the€sentence.ðð€òòState€v.€JorgeÐ À  ÐObdulio€Herrera,óó€No.€E1999-00118-CCA-R3-CD,€slip€op.€at€2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€JulyÐ ¬ü  Ð20,€2000).€€The€defendant,€as€the€appellant,€is€obliged€to€furnish€this€court€with€a€fair,€accurate,€andÐ ˜è  Ðcomplete€record€of€what€transpired€in€the€trial€court€with€respect€to€the€issues€that€form€the€bases€ofÐ „Ô  Ðthe€appeal.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b);€òòState€v.€Banesóó,€874€S.W.2d€73,€82€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993);Ð pÀ ÐòòState€v.€Milleróó,€737€S.W.2d€556,€558€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€In€the€absence€of€such€a€record,€theÐ \¬ Ðaffected€issues€are€waived.€€òòState€v.€Oodyóó,€823€S.W.2d€554,€559€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€However,Ð H˜ Ðwe€also€have€commented€that€occasionally€we€can€ð ðreconstruct€.€.€.€an€undisputed€version€of€€theÐ 4„ Ðfactual€events€of€the€crimeðð€from€the€ð ðbits€and€piecesðð€of€the€record€on€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€òòJorge€ObdulioÐ  p ÐHerreraóó,€slip€op.€at€2-3,€n.l.€€In€the€present€case,€the€record€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€including€theÐ  \ Ðpresentence€report,€affords€us€an€adequate€view€of€the€nature€and€circumstances€of€the€convictionÐ øH Ðoffense.€€Thus,€we€proceed€to€the€appellate€issue€at€hand.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àà ` àWhen€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€itÐ ¼  Ðis€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€of€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€theÐ ¨ø Ðdeterminations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.òò€óóðð€40-35-401(d)€(1997).€€ThisÐ ”ä Ðpresumption€is€ð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€courtÐ €Ð Ðconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823Ð l¼ ÐS.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€ð ðThe€burden€of€showing€that€the€sentence€is€improper€is€upon€theÐ X ¨ Ðappellant.ðð€€òòId.€óóIn€the€event€the€record€fails€to€demonstrate€the€required€consideration€by€the€trialÐ D!” Ðcourt,€review€of€the€sentence€is€purely€òòde€novoóó.€€òòId.óó€€If€appellate€review€reflects€the€trial€courtÐ 0"€  Ðproperly€considered€all€relevant€factors€and€its€findings€of€fact€are€adequately€supported€by€theÐ #l! Ðrecord,€this€court€must€affirm€the€sentence,€ð ðeven€if€we€would€have€preferred€a€different€result.€€òòStateÐ $X" Ðv.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð ô$D # ÐÌà  àà ` àAn€alternate€sentence€is€any€sentence€that€does€not€involve€total€confinement.€€òòSeeÐ Ì&"% Ðgenerally€State€v.€Fieldsóó,€40€S.W.3d€435€(Tenn.€2001).€€A€defendant€who€ð ðis€an€especially€mitigatedÐ ¸'#& Ðor€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D,€or€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidateÐ ¤(ô#' Ðfor€alternative€sentencing€options€in€the€absence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ )à$( Ð40-35-102(6)€(1997).€€Our€sentencing€law€also€provides€that€ð ðconvicted€felons€committing€the€mostÐ |*Ì%) Ðsevere€offenses,€possessing€criminal€histories€evincing€a€clear€disregard€for€the€laws€and€morals€ofÐ h+¸&* Ðsociety,€and€evincing€failure€of€past€efforts€at€rehabilitation,€shall€be€given€first€priority€regardingÐ ° Ðsentences€involving€incarceration.ðð€€òòId.óó€ðð€40-35-102(5)€(1997).€€Thus,€a€defendant€who€meets€theÐ œì Ðabove€criteria€is€presumed€eligible€for€alternative€sentencing€unless€sufficient€evidence€rebuts€theÐ ˆØ Ðpresumption.€€However,€the€Act€does€not€provide€that€all€offenders€who€meet€the€criteria€are€entitledÐ tÄ Ðto€such€relief;€rather,€it€requires€that€sentencing€issues€be€determined€by€the€facts€and€circumstancesÐ `° Ðpresented€in€each€case.€€òòSee€State€v.€Tayloróó,€744€S.W.2d€919,€922€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).Ð L œ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€presumption€of€favorable€candidacy€for€alternative€sentencing€may€be€rebuttedÐ $ t Ðby€ð ðevidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€òòFieldsóó,€40€S.W.3d€at€440.€€Ð  ` ÐÌÒ` °ÒÒ` °ÒGuidance€as€to€what€constitutes€evidence€to€the€contrary€may€beÐ è 8  Ðfound€in€the€following€sentencing€considerations€contained€inÐ Ô$  ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40-35-103(1)€(1997):Ð À  ÐÌà ¸ à(A)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restrainingÐ ˜è  Ða€defendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;Ð „Ô  ÐÌà ¸ à(B)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€theÐ \¬ Ðseriousness€of€the€offense€or€confinement€is€especially€suited€toÐ H˜ Ðprovide€an€effective€deterrence€to€others€likely€to€commit€similarÐ 4„ Ðoffenses;€€orÐ  p ÐÌà ¸ à(C)€Measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequentlyÐ øH Ðor€recently€been€applied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.€Ð ä4 ÐÌÒ°` ÒÒ°` ÒòòId.óó€€When€the€presumption€of€favorable€candidacy€for€alternative€sentencing€applies€and€the€stateÐ ¼  Ðseeks€to€rebut€it€via€Code€section€40„35„103(1)(B)€by€showing€that€confinement€is€necessary€to€avoidÐ ¨ø Ðdepreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€a€resulting€trial€court€decision€to€impose€totalÐ ”ä Ðconfinement€must€be€predicated€upon€a€finding€that€the€nature€and€circumstances€of€the€offense€areÐ €Ð Ðð ðespecially€violent,€horrifying,€shocking,€reprehensible,€offensive,€or€otherwise€of€an€excessive€orÐ l¼ Ðexaggerated€degree,ðð€and€the€nature€of€the€offense€must€outweigh€all€factors€favoring€probation.Ð X ¨ ÐòòStateóó€òòv.€Travisóó,€622€S.W.2d€529,€534€(Tenn.€1981);€òòseeóó€òòStateóó€òòv.€Hartleyóó,€818€S.W.2d€370,€375€(Tenn.Ð D!” ÐCrim.€App.€1991)€(òòTravisóó€qualifiers€of€nature€and€circumstances€of€offense€have€been€codified€inÐ 0"€  Ðsection€40-35-103(1)(B)€which€considers€confinement€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€theÐ #l! Ðoffense).òò€€óó€Ð $X" ÐÌà  àà ` àð ðSentencing€decisions€should€not,€however,€turn€on€a€generalization€of€the€crimeÐ à%0!$ Ðcommitted,€such€as€the€fact€that€a€death€occurred.ðð€€òòState€v.€Housewrightóó,€982€S.W.2d€354,€356Ð Ì&"% Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997)€(citing€òòState€v.€Binghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€448,€456€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995)).€Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendant,€a€Range€I€offender,€enjoyed€the€presumption€of€favorable€candidacyÐ )à$( Ðfor€alternative€sentencing€for€her€Class€C€felony.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-102(6)€(1997).€Ð |*Ì%) ÐMoreover,€she€was€eligible€for€probation.€€òòSee€id.óó€ðð€40-35-303(a)€(1997).€€€€à x àÐ h+¸&* Їà  àà ` àIn€the€present€case,€the€trial€court€referred€to€the€sentencing€principles€but€did€notÐ ° Ðrefer€specifically€to€Code€section€40„35„103€in€determining€that€a€sentence€of€total€confinement€wasÐ œì Ðappropriate.€€If€a€trial€court€ignores€the€governing€statute€on€rebutting€the€presumption€favoringÐ ˆØ Ðalternative€sentencing€in€imposing€a€sentence€of€total€confinement,€we€should€generally€review€theÐ tÄ Ðsentence€òòde€novoóó,€without€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€òòSee€Fieldsóó,€40€S.W.3d€at€440„41.€€However,Ð `° Ðin€the€present€case,€we€believe€the€presumption€of€correctness€applies€because€the€trial€court€tacitlyÐ L œ Ðalluded€to€section€40„35„103€and€to€òòTravisóó/òòHartleyóó.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€trial€judge€ð ðspecifically€[found]€that€the€Defendant€in€order€to€maintain€the€moralÐ  ` Ðsymmetry€between€crime€and€punishment€in€a€situation€like€this€should€serve€three€years€in€the€StateÐ ü L  ÐPenitentiary€as€a€Standard€Offender.ðð€€We€comprehend€this€statement€to€refer€to€the€need€to€avoid€Ð è 8  Ðdepreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(B)€(1997).€€He€alsoÐ Ô$  Ðfound€ð ðthat€this€is€just€about€as€aggravated€as€a€vehicular€homicide€by€recklessness€can€be[,]€.€.€.€thatÐ À  Ðthe€Defendant€is€guilty€of€gross€recklessness€in€operating€her€vehicle.€€She€injured€a€passenger.€€SheÐ ¬ü  Ðhad€a€child€[]€four€years€old.ðð€€Thus,€the€trial€court€found€that€the€nature€and€circumstances€of€theÐ ˜è  Ðoffense€were€especially€reprehensible€and€exaggerated.€€òòSee€Travisóó,€622€S.W.2d€at€534.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àà ` àWe€agree€with€this€assessment.€€The€fatal€accident€which€the€defendant€caused€wasÐ \¬ Ðnot€just€the€result€of€some€fleeting€moment€of€inattention;€rather,€it€resulted€from€a€high„speed€ð ðcat„Ð H˜ Ðand„mouseðð€game€which€covered€approximately€100€miles€of€Interstate€40.€€Furthermore,€theÐ 4„ Ðdefendant€did€not€come€before€the€sentencing€court€with€the€cleanest€of€hands.€€She€had€previouslyÐ  p Ðbeen€convicted€of€two€speeding€offenses,€and€one€of€those€additionally€involved€her€driving€withoutÐ  \ Ða€license.€€Not€only€did€the€defendantððs€recklessness€result€in€the€victimððs€death,€but€it€imperiled€bothÐ øH Ðpassengers€in€her€car,€including€her€four„year„old€son.€€When€asked€in€the€sentencing€hearingÐ ä4 Ðwhether€she€realized€that€her€conduct€endangered€her€child,€the€defendant€said,€ð ðNo,€sir.€€I€didnððtÐ Ð  Ðthink€about€that.ðð€€Finally,€the€collision€resulted€in€bodily€injury€to€the€defendantððs€adult€maleÐ ¼  Ðcompanion;€he€spent€twelve€days€in€the€hospital.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×ò ò€ó ó€€In€our€view,€these€circumstances€warrant€the€trialÐ ¨ø Ðcourtððs€finding€that€the€nature€of€the€offense€was€exaggerated.€€Based€upon€the€aptness€of€thisÐ ˜è Ðfinding,€the€trial€courtððs€imposition€of€a€sentence€of€confinement€is€warranted.€€Ð „Ô ÐÌà  àà ` àWe€notice€that€the€conviction€judgment€does€not€provide€for€the€prohibition€fromÐ \ ¬ Ðdriving€of€a€defendant€convicted€of€vehicular€homicide€that€is€mandated€by€Tennessee€CodeÐ H!˜ ÐAnnotated€section€39„13„213(c)€(1997).€€Pursuant€to€that€Code€section,€the€trial€court€must€imposeÐ 4"„  Ða€driving€prohibition€for€a€period€of€time€ð ðnot€less€than€three€(3)€years€nor€more€than€ten€(10)€years.ðð€Ð  #p! ÐòòIdóó.€€Thus,€on€remand,€the€trial€court€shall€revise€the€judgment€to€comply€with€section€39„13„213(c).€Ð  $\" ÐÌà  àà ` àOtherwise,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€judgment.Ð ä%4!$ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  à€Ð Ð& "% Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ¼' #& Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGE