ÿWPCø# ƒt>­AVÛ‘U‰Ñ‘W‰ã‹×EË~‚±;ê&¸©*÷œ¥ü=­^Vs«`B×7§&Ûr5Äñкב†3Ïf;¯yWšdoñ¨·/k½Â—¿WŒØKÖšGž·ñ·¬E©Î5°p½­4óÖ9àîZQ®öõv*c[…47ÚH)j³@šü0zZXÁ@_š+â` ×M#oïØ² Sa¼ÝÞ)ä1u”4ø¥Yhb)y¿ïfôâøùWþ?¾ïß+òÇ‘òYþ¼Ï„ôž‡¤qÏΊJ µ’Æ‘„]e Iå¾î;§£æ;Në°šg}b'³K¾e³Us0DÜÂËâtÌÉU.ƒ Z£öù]&Ã0µ§­™ïvÚ±'•„|áH¯à çHæ?jÐ]WâÅ`¤×2ôѪˆ…R±cÅ›‡ÚŠ=æåÞp§ü‹¾GP  ¶͸e­ù%–NTÃd|¾/ƒ×ó»=˜/3P®š—'?½$‰ë-§È®iÚì`@gÛÔmPÃÈIV| ?ïU‚f«78I eî6jY†ðMAn°ª š>.)(¯­ìT%’»@‘x'Ž9Cg˜[F„xœ+Aã+g £]Õ‰4f,úlr¬G‰rª×©•W#ÉÂUN‹ %Ù 0(ß M 0Ÿ 0<ª 0}æ U>c w¡ 4¥ ¹ È mÊ <á M 01! 0=R 0È 0>W 0Ê• 0´_ 0´ 0aÇ 0´( 0´Ü 09 0ÜÉ 02¥ 0ü× 0:Ó 0…  0_’ 0 ñ 0kû 0•f B*û D3% D+X 0•ƒ 0ç 06ÿ 05 0:= 0hw 0FßU6%U*[M…M‰Æ 0CS 0(– AM¾ M !M!M!M!M!(!NG!^ I!U NU!E£!†¥! 0l+# 0D—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—#—# BÛ#˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6ÒV,,,,ÒV0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡64'ÿÿ4heading 1Ó  Óò òÔ‡XXXÔÔ  ÔÔ  ÔÓ  Óó óÔ‡XXXÔ<ÿÿ:Default Para.''ÿÿ,TitleÓ  Óò òÔ‡XXXÔÓ  Óó óÔ‡XXXÔô\  `&Times New Romanlk.ê:i¢Ø+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ NORVELL DUIbreathalyzerTiptonStriblingTackettMcMurtryKrenkIntoxilyzerreweighIntoximeterrebuttable CrimT.C.A. TBI0ÿÿ.Normal<ÿÿ:Definition T<GDÿÿ:Definition LÓ , ÓÓ;1ܰÜ` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#;ÓÓ  ÓÓ8.°°` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#8Ó8ÿÿ6Definitionòòóó('zÿÿ&H1ò òÔ  ÔÔ‡°°°Ôó óÔ  ÔÔ‡XXXÔ(oÿÿ&H2ò òÔ‡„„„Ôó óÔ‡XXXÔ(oÿÿ&H3ò òÔ‡¼¼¼Ôó óÔ‡XXXÔ(ÿÿ&H4ò òÔ‡XXXÔó óÔ‡XXXÔ(oÿÿ&H5ò òÔ‡ôôôÔó óÔ‡XXXÔ(oÿÿ&H6ò òÔ‡Ôó óÔ‡XXXÔ2ÿÿ0Addressòòóó8SPÿÿ6BlockquoteÓ , ÓÓ , ÓÓ;1ܰÜ` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#;ÓÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÓ8.°°` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#8Ó,ÿÿ*CITEòòóó,dlÿÿ*CODEÔ‡ôôôÔÔK‡/<þ6X9`(Courier NewKÔÔ‡XXXÔÔS‡ ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔ4ÿÿ2Emphasisòòóó6&)ÿÿ4HyperlinkÔ  ÔÔ  ÔòòÔ ÿ ÔóóÔ  ÔÔ  ÔÔ  Ô<ÿÿ:FollowedHypeòòÔ €€ ÔóóÔ  Ô4goÿÿ2Keyboardò òÔ‡ôôôÔÔK‡/<þ6X9`(Courier NewKÔó óÔ‡XXXÔÔS‡ ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔ<“›ÿÿ:PreformattedÓ/%° °Ïî ,KkŠ©È (#/ÓÔ‡ôôôÔÔK‡/<þ6X9`(Courier NewKÔÔ‡XXXÔÔS‡ ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔÓ/%° °Ïî ,KkŠ©È (#/Ó<ª®ÿÿ:z©Bottom of Ó=€&(€˜ **=ÓÓ  ÓÔB  ÔÔ‡ÔÔ?‡0%ä2¼A`Arial?ÔÓ-€'€ -ÓÓ  ÓÔ‡XXXÔÔS‡ ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔ&ÿÿ0 d d%%%%'þÿÈÈÈÈdxd'ÈÈÈÈdxd<ª®ÿÿ:z©Top of ForÓ=€&(€˜**=ÓÓ  ÓÔB  ÔÔ‡ÔÔ?‡0%ä2¼A`Arial?ÔÓ-€'€ -ÓÓ  ÓÔ‡XXXÔÔS‡ ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔ0Klÿÿ.SampleÔK‡/<þ6X9`(Courier NewKÔÔS‡ ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔ0ÿÿ.Strongò òó ó8dlÿÿ6TypewriterÔ‡ôôôÔÔK‡/<þ6X9`(Courier NewKÔÔ‡XXXÔÔS‡ ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔ4ÿÿ2Variableòòóó:ÿÿ8HTML MarkupÔB  ÔÔ ÿ ÔÔ  Ô2 ÿÿ0CommentÔB  Ô<þ6X9`(Courier New%ä2¼A`Arial Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2C$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(ÿÿ$’’345'A<< cÿÿ ²Œ/Ï (í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular |Ý ƒBüÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôÕ òXXÔThe€question€of€whether€the€Intoxilyzer€1400€is€a€scientifically€reliable€breath€test€machine€whoseÐ ° Ðreliability€is€sufficient€to€allow€the€òòSensingóó€factors€to€apply€has€not€been€raised€and€is€not€before€us.Ô#†XmöX òôÕS#Ô((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(%Ã$òòÚ  Ú1Ú  Úóó dÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_Ôò òÓ  Óó óÔ‡?X@™XXXÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ‡?¼·»X?X@™ÔÑ8€?@™?XXdédÈ8ÑÑ  Ñà@@ttìàÔ#†?X@™X»?¼·t#ÔÔ‡?îôPîX?X@™ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ ° Ðà@@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†?X@™Xî?îôP #ÔÔ‡?¼·»X?X@™ÔÐ Ó# Ðà @ àMay€13,€2003€SessionÐ öF ÐÔ#†?X@™X»?¼·¯#ÔÌò òÔ‡?¼·»X?X@™ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€STEVEN€A.€NORVELLÔ#†?X@™X»?¼·?#Ôó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNos.€2001„T„520€and€2002„T„195€€€€€€Frank€G.€Clement,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V@) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2002„01866„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€December€12,€Ô_Ô2003Ô_ÔÐ ŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V@) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ.ÓÓ  ÓÔ#†XmöXX?X@™=#ÔThe€defendant,€Steven€A.€Norvell,€was€convicted€by€a€Davidson€County€Criminal€Court€jury€ofÐ V¦  Ðdriving€under€the€influence€(DUI),€third€offense,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€The€trial€court€sentencedÐ ? Ðhim€to€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days€to€be€served€as€one€hundred€forty€days€in€jail€and€theÐ (x Ðremainder€on€probation.€€In€addition,€the€trial€court€ordered€that€he€participate€in€an€alcoholÐ a Ðevaluation€and€treatment€program,€suspended€his€driving€privileges€for€three€years,€and€imposed€aÐ úJ Ðone€thousand€one€hundred€dollar€fine.€€The€defendant€contends€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient€toÐ ã3 Ðsupport€his€conviction€because€the€state€offered€no€proof€that€the€result€of€his€breathalyzer€test€wasÐ Ì Ðaccurate.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ô‡?X@™XXXmöÔÐ µ ÐÓÕÓÌò òÓ  ÓTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ ‡× ÐÌòòÓ  ÓJoseph€M.€Tipton,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Wellesóó€and€òòAlan€E.Ð Zª ÐGlenn,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð C“ ÐÌM.€Scott€Collins,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Steven€A.€Norvell.Ð e ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Kim€R.€Helper,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð ç 7  ÐVictor€S.€Johnson,€III,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Jennifer€Stribling€Tackett€and€Scott€R.Ð Ð! ! ÐMcMurtry,€Assistant€District€Attorneys€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ¹" " ÐÓ- ÓÌà@@66'ìàò òOPINIONó óÐ ‹$Û$ ÐÌÓ  ÓÔ#†XmöXX?X@™o#Ôà  àOfficer€Edwin€Krenk€of€the€Metropolitan€Nashville€Police€Department€(Metro€Police)Ð ^&®!& Ðtestified€that€on€June€1,€2001,€at€about€2:20€a.m.,€he€saw€the€defendant€drive€through€the€intersectionÐ G'—"' Ðof€Broadway€and€Eighth€Avenue€with€no€headlights.€€He€said€he€stopped€the€defendant€andÐ 0(€#( Ðapproached€the€defendantððs€white€pickup€truck.€€He€said€he€noticed€a€strong€smell€of€alcohol€andÐ )i$) Ðasked€to€see€the€defendantððs€driverððs€license.€€He€said€that€the€defendant€fumbled€while€getting€theÐ *R%* Ðlicense,€that€the€defendantððs€moves€appeared€calculated,€that€the€defendantððs€eyes€were€extremelyÐ ë*;&+ Ðred€and€watery,€and€that€the€defendantððs€speech€was€slurred.Ð Ô+$', Ðâ âÐ ½, (- ÐÔ_Ôà  àOfficer€Krenk€testified€that€he€asked€the€defendant€to€step€out€of€the€truck€and€take€fieldÐ ° Ðâ âsobriety€tests.€€He€said€that€the€defendant€agreed€to€take€the€tests€and€that€he€gave€the€tests€inÐ ™é Ðaccordance€with€his€training.€€He€said€that€the€area€was€well€lit,€that€he€instructed€the€defendant€onÐ ‚Ò Ðthe€one„leg€stand€and€the€walk€and€turn€tests,€and€that€he€demonstrated€both€tests€to€the€defendant.€Ð k» ÐHe€said€he€could€not€remember€if€he€asked€the€defendant€to€repeat€the€instructions€to€him.€€He€saidÐ T¤ Ðthe€defendant€performed€the€tests€and€showed€indications€of€intoxication€on€both.€€He€said€that€onÐ =  Ðthe€walk€and€turn€test,€the€defendant€scored€six€out€of€eight€possible€indicators€of€intoxication€andÐ & v Ðthat€on€the€one„leg€stand,€the€defendant€scored€two€out€of€four€possible€indicators€of€intoxication.€Ð  _ ÐÌà  àOfficer€Krenk€testified€that€he€arrested€the€defendant,€read€the€defendant€his€implied€consentÐ á 1  Ðrights,€and€asked€the€defendant€if€he€understood€those€rights.€€He€said€the€defendant€said€yes€andÐ Ê   Ðagreed€to€take€a€breathalyzer€test.€€He€said€he€placed€the€defendant€into€the€back€of€his€patrol€car€andÐ ³  Ðwatched€the€defendant€for€twenty€minutes€before€giving€him€the€breathalyzer.€€He€said€the€defendantÐ œì  Ðdid€not€drink€any€alcohol,€regurgitate,€smoke,€or€have€anything€in€his€mouth€during€that€time.€€HeÐ …Õ  Ðsaid€that€after€the€observation€period,€he€instructed€the€defendant€on€how€to€take€the€breathalyzer.€Ð n¾  ÐHe€said€that€before€the€defendant€took€the€breath€test,€the€defendant€stated€that€he€had€consumed€sixÐ W§  Ðbeers€and€that€he€was€going€to€fail€the€test.€€He€said€that€he€gave€the€defendant€the€breath€test€andÐ @ Ðthat€the€defendantððs€blood€alcohol€content€(BAC)€registered€0.12%€at€2:54€a.m.€€Officer€KrenkÐ )y Ðidentified€the€defendantððs€test€slip,€which€had€the€defendantððs€fingerprint€on€it,€and€the€test€slip€wasÐ b Ðadmitted€into€evidence.€€He€said€there€was€no€doubt€in€his€mind€that€the€defendant€was€driving€whileÐ ûK Ðimpaired.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àOfficer€Krenk€testified€that€he€has€an€Intoxilyzer€1400€in€his€patrol€car€and€that€he€wasÐ ¶ Ðcertified€in€May€2000€by€the€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation€(TBI)€to€use€the€Intoxilyzer€1400.€Ð Ÿï ÐHe€said€that€his€Intoxilyzer€1400€is€calibrated€and€certified€by€the€TBI€every€ninety€days€and€thatÐ ˆØ Ðit€had€been€certified€by€the€TBI€on€March€28,€2001.€€The€machineððs€certificate€was€admitted€intoÐ qÁ Ðevidence€and€states€that€it€met€the€performance€standards€established€by€T.C.A.€ðð€38„6„104(g)€andÐ Zª Ðthat€it€was€found€to€perform€within€the€standards€adopted€in€Section€5€of€the€TBIððs€standards€forÐ C“ Ðscientific€instruments€to€measure€breath€alcohol.€€Officer€Krenk€testified€that€the€Metro€Police€givesÐ ,| Ðeach€Intoxilyzer€a€ð ðwet€bathðð€during€every€shift,€that€he€gave€the€breathalyzer€test€in€accordanceÐ e Ðwith€the€TBIððs€standards,€that€the€Intoxilyzer€1400€was€working€properly€on€the€night€of€June€1,€andÐ þN Ðthat€the€defendantððs€test€was€a€completed€test.€€He€said€that€if€the€Intoxilyzer€1400€had€not€beenÐ ç 7 Ðworking€properly,€it€would€not€have€completed€the€test.€Ð Ð!   ÐÌà  àOn€cross„examination,€Officer€Krenk€testified€that€the€only€problem€he€saw€with€the€Ð ¢#ò" Ðdefendantððs€driving€was€that€the€defendant€had€no€headlights.€€He€said€that€all€police€officers€wereÐ ‹$Û# Ðtrained€to€perform€the€field€sobriety€tests€in€the€same€way€and€that€officers€could€take€into€accountÐ t%Ä $ Ðdifferent€variables€such€as€a€personððs€height€and€weight.€€He€said€that€there€was€no€way€to€input€suchÐ ]&­!% Ðvariables€into€the€breathalyzer€machine€and€that€it€measured€all€people€the€same,€regardless€ofÐ F'–"& Ðheight,€weight,€and€gender€factors.€€He€said€that€the€flashing€blue€lights€on€the€front€of€his€patrol€carÐ /(#' Ðwere€turned€off€and€not€shining€on€the€defendantððs€face€during€the€field€sobriety€tests.€€He€said€thatÐ )h$( Ðthe€field€sobriety€tests€were€administered€on€the€sidewalk€and€that€there€was€very€little€traffic.€€Ð *Q%) Ðâ âÐ ê*:&* Ðà  àOfficer€Krenk€testified€that€while€he€instructed€the€defendant€on€the€walk€and€turn€test,€heÐ ° Ðâ âmade€the€defendant€stand€heel€to€toe€on€a€line.€€He€said€that€this€is€not€a€normal€stance€and€thatÐ ™é Ðpeople€may€try€to€balance€themselves€on€something€when€standing€heel€to€toe.€€He€said€that€theÐ ‚Ò Ðdefendant€tried€to€balance€on€something,€that€the€defendant€began€the€task€before€being€instructedÐ k» Ðto€do€so,€that€the€defendant€could€not€keep€his€balance€during€the€test,€that€the€defendant€did€notÐ T¤ Ðtouch€heel€to€toe€on€all€nine€steps,€and€that€the€defendant€stepped€off€the€line€during€the€test.€€He€saidÐ =  Ðthat€these€are€all€indicators€of€intoxication.€€He€said€that€officers€are€trained€to€give€a€little€leewayÐ & v Ðon€touching€heel€to€toe€and€that€the€defendant€took€nine€steps€as€required€by€his€instructions.€€HeÐ  _ Ðsaid€that€indicators€of€intoxication€for€the€one„leg€stand€test€are€whether€the€subject€puts€his€or€herÐ ø H Ðfoot€down,€whether€the€subject€keeps€both€hands€to€the€side,€and€whether€the€subject€hops€to€keepÐ á 1  Ðbalance.€€€He€said€that€the€defendant€raised€his€arms€and€hopped€throughout€the€test€and€that€theÐ Ê   Ðdefendantððs€count€was€off.€Ð ³  ÐÌà  àOfficer€Krenk€testified€that€he€gave€his€Intoxilyzer€1400€to€the€TBI€every€ninety€days€forÐ …Õ  Ðcertification€and€that€he€was€not€present€when€it€was€certified.€€He€acknowledged€that€he€was€notÐ n¾  Ða€scientist€and€that€his€job€did€not€require€him€to€know€the€science€behind€the€Intoxilyzer.€€He€saidÐ W§  Ðthat€he€could€not€explain€how€the€Intoxilyzer€converted€a€breath€alcohol€measure€into€a€bloodÐ @ Ðalcohol€measure€and€that€he€could€not€prove€that€the€science€behind€the€breathalyzer€machine€wasÐ )y Ðgood€science€as€opposed€to€junk€science.€€He€acknowledged€that€he€could€not€prove€the€machine€wasÐ b Ðaccurate.€€The€jury€convicted€the€defendant€of€driving€with€a€blood€alcohol€concentration€of€0.10%Ð ûK Ðor€greater.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€argues€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€his€conviction€because€theÐ ¶ Ðstate€offered€no€proof€that€the€breathalyzer€test€result€was€accurate.€€The€state€responds€that€theÐ Ÿï Ðbreath€test€results€were€admitted€in€accordance€with€òòState€v.€Sensingóó,€843€S.W.2d€412€(Tenn.€1992),€Ð ˆØ Ðand,€therefore,€that€the€evidence€is€sufficient€to€support€the€conviction.€€We€believe€that€the€evidenceÐ qÁ Ðis€sufficient.€Ð Zª ÐÌà  àOur€standard€of€review€when€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€is€questioned€on€appeal€isÐ ,| Ðð ðwhether,€after€viewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution,€òòanyóó€rational€trierÐ e Ðof€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ðð€€òòJacksonÐ þN Ðv.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319,€99€S.€Ct.€2781,€2789€(1979).€€This€means€that€we€do€not€reweigh€theÐ ç 7 Ðevidence€but€presume€that€the€jury€has€resolved€all€conflicts€in€the€testimony€and€drawn€allÐ Ð!   Ðreasonable€inferences€from€the€evidence€in€favor€of€the€state.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Sheffieldóó,€676€S.W.2dÐ ¹" ! Ð542,€547€(Tenn.€1984);€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€Ð ¢#ò" ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€55„10„401(a)(2)€provides€in€pertinent€part€thatÐ t%Ä $ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à[it]€is€unlawful€for€any€person€to€drive€or€to€be€in€physical€control€ofÐ F'–"& Ðany€automobile€or€other€motor€driven€vehicle€on€any€of€the€publicÐ /(#' Ðroads€and€highways€of€the€state,€or€on€any€streets€or€alleys,€or€whileÐ )h$( Ðon€the€premises€of€any€shopping€center,€trailer€park€or€any€apartmentÐ *Q%) Ðhouse€complex,€or€any€other€premises€which€is€generally€frequentedÐ ê*:&* Ðby€the€public€at€large,€while:ÐÓ+#'+` x` x Їà8  àà8` Ð Ð à.€.€.€.а` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(2)€The€alcohol€concentration€in€such€personððs€blood€or€breath€is€ten„Ð ‚Ò Ðhundredths€of€one€percent€(.10%)€or€more.Ðk»` x` x ÐÌThe€plain€language€of€the€statute€does€require€the€state€to€show€that€the€defendantððs€blood€alcoholÐ =  Ðconcentration€was€.10€percent€or€more€at€the€time€the€defendant€was€driving.Ð & v ÐÌà  àIn€òòSensingóó,€our€supreme€court€addressed€the€necessary€foundation€that€the€state€mustÐ ø H Ðestablish€in€order€to€admit€breath€test€results€from€an€Intoximeter€3000.€€€Before€òòSensingóó,€theÐ á 1  Ðcertified€operator€of€the€test€machine€had€been€required€to€know€the€scientific€technology€behindÐ Ê   Ðthe€machineððs€function.€€òòId.óó€€€However,€in€òòSensingóó,€the€court€held€that€in€order€for€the€test€results€toÐ ³  Ðbe€admissible€evidence€in€a€DUI€by€impairment€case,€the€testing€officer€only€had€to€testify€as€to€theÐ œì  Ðfollowing€six€prerequisites:Ð …Õ  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(1)€that€the€tests€were€performed€in€accordance€with€the€standardsÐ W§  Ðand€operating€procedures€promulgated€by€the€forensic€servicesÐ @ Ðdivision€of€the€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation,Ð)y` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(2)€that€he€was€properly€certified€in€accordance€with€those€standards,ÐûK` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(3)€that€the€evidentiary€breath€testing€instrument€used€was€certifiedÐ Í Ðby€the€forensic€services€division,€was€tested€regularly€for€accuracyÐ ¶ Ðand€was€working€properly€when€the€breath€test€was€performed,Пï` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(4)€that€the€motorist€was€observed€for€the€requisite€20€minutes€priorÐ qÁ Ðto€the€test,€and€during€this€period,€he€did€not€have€foreign€matter€inÐ Zª Ðhis€mouth,€did€not€consume€any€alcoholic€beverage,€smoke,€orÐ C“ Ðregurgitate,Ð,|` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(5)€evidence€that€he€followed€the€prescribed€operational€procedure,ÐþN` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(6)€identify€the€print-out€record€offered€in€evidence€as€the€result€ofÐ Ð!   Ðthe€test€given€to€the€person€tested.€€Ð¹" !` x` x ÐÌòòId.óó€at€416.€€Once€the€state€satisfied€the€prerequisites,€the€test€result€was€admissible,€and€a€BAC€ofÐ ‹$Û# Ð0.10%€or€more€created€a€rebuttable€presumption€of€intoxication.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€55„10„408(a)€(2002)Ð t%Ä $ Ð(amended€2003).€€However,€the€court€stated€that€a€defendant€was€free€ð ðto€challenge€the€accuracy€ofÐ ]&­!% Ðthe€particular€machine,€the€qualifications€of€the€operator,€and€the€degree€to€which€established€testingÐ F'–"& Ðprocedures€were€followed.ðð€€òòSensingóó,€843€S.W.2d€at€416.€€ð ðSuch€challenges,€however,€go€only€toÐ /(#' Ðthe€weight€of€the€evidence€as€distinguished€from€its€admissibility.ðð€€òòState€v.€Edisonóó,€9€S.W.3d€75,Ð )h$( Ð77€(Tenn.€1999).Ð *Q%) Ðâ âÐ ê*:&* Ðà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€state€failed€to€prove€that€his€breathalyzer€test€result€of€0.12%Ð ° Ðâ âwas€an€accurate€measure€of€his€BAC€because€the€state€failed€to€establish€the€accuracy€of€theÐ ™é ÐIntoxilyzer€1400.€€While€he€admits€that€the€test€result€was€properly€admitted€into€evidence€under€theÐ ‚Ò Ðsix€òòSensingóó€prerequisites,€he€argues€that€òòSensingóó€did€not€establish€a€presumption€of€reliability€as€toÐ k» Ðthe€accuracy€of€the€test€result€in€this€case€because€òòSensingóó€creates€such€a€presumption€only€withÐ T¤ Ðregard€to€a€DUI€by€impairment€charge,€not€a€charge€of€DUI€òòperóó€òòseóó.€€However,€in€òòState€v.€Conwayóó,Ð =  Ð77€S.W.3d€213,€220€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2001),€this€court€stated€thatÐ & v ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à[Sensing]€did€not€address€DUI€òòperóó€òòseóó€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ø H Ð55-10-401(a)(2)€as€this€portion€of€the€statute€had€not€been€enacted€atÐ á 1  Ðthe€time€of€òòSensingóó.€ÐÊ  ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àNevertheless€.€.€.€we€see€no€reason€to€require€expert€testimonyÐ œì  Ðfor€breath€test€results€for€DUI€per€se,€while€not€requiring€expertÐ …Õ  Ðtestimony€to€establish€an€inference€for€DUI€by€impairment.€€We€findÐ n¾  Ðnothing€in€the€constitution,€statutes€or€rules€that€would€requireÐ W§  Ðdifferent€treatment,€and€this€court€is€not€at€liberty€to€engraft€such€aÐ @ Ðrequirement.€€€Ð)y` x` x ÐÌThus,€if€the€òòSensingóó€prerequisites€are€met€in€a€DUI€òòperóó€òòseóó€case,€the€reliability€of€breath€test€resultsÐ ûK Ðis€presumed€without€expert€testimony.€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àProcedurally,€we€believe€the€defendantððs€arguments€about€reliability€beg€the€question.€€If€aÐ ¶ Ðscientific€test€is€not€reliable,€then€its€results€are€irrelevant€to€the€issues€on€trial€and€potentiallyÐ Ÿï Ðprejudicial.€€Therefore,€the€results€of€the€test€would€be€inadmissible.€€Here,€the€defendant€allowedÐ ˆØ Ðthe€test€results€into€evidence€and€acknowledged€that€it€was€properly€admitted€under€the€òòSensingóóÐ qÁ Ðrequirements.€€However,€application€of€the€òòSensingóó€requirements€to€the€Intoxilyzer€1400€for€theÐ Zª Ðpurpose€of€admissibility€necessarily€presupposed€the€reliability€of€the€device€to€measure€bloodÐ C“ Ðalcohol.׃A×Ý ƒC%ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ,| ÐÌà  àGiven€these€circumstances,€pursuant€to€òòConwayóó,€the€state€was€not€required€to€present€expertÐ þN Ðtestimony€to€prove€the€accuracy€of€the€test€results.€€Officer€Krenk€testified€that€he€was€certified€toÐ ç 7 Ðadminister€breath€tests€with€the€Intoxilyzer€1400,€that€he€performed€the€defendantððs€breath€test€inÐ Ð!   Ðaccordance€with€the€TBIððs€standards,€that€his€test€machine€had€been€certified€by€the€TBI€less€thanÐ ¹" ! Ðninety€days€before€the€defendantððs€DUI€arrest,€and€that€his€machine€would€not€have€completed€theÐ ¢#ò" Ðtest€if€it€had€been€working€improperly.€€We€also€note€that€the€defendant€did€not€provide€any€evidenceÐ ‹$Û# Ðof€the€testððs€inaccuracy.€€We€conclude€that€the€jury€was€entitled€to€accredit€the€results€of€the€breathÐ t%Ä $ Ðtest€and€the€evidence€is€sufficient€to€support€the€defendantððs€conviction€of€driving€with€a€bloodÐ ]&­!% Ðalcohol€content€of€.10€percent€or€more.€Ð F'–"& ÐÌà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€whole,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð )h$( ЇÌà  àÌà  à€à ` àà ¸ àà0  àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àà0À(#À(#àÔ‡?X@™XXXmöÔ___________________________________€Ð‚Ò(#(# Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGEÔ#†XmöXX?X@™)O#ÔÐ k» ÐÌÓB.°°` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#°œXBÓÌà  àà ` à