WPC> |͢>>`@)ɯBX0@5\kl;–$G948Kr$\d_˱5_)cjdS HAwad=^_85} }pJ-]d"+[V6 }E4 G`z8Vzc E|3&v;}O), K2a8^>|z }`Fmvr~Pu bUbѬ\1,op@X"j~tmIh-ҟ}̓zN;cZbuu)U Y ,\W7T\lA8%܆ۇ y՛΄ħ:eEaq#qQ{JZ]O'ۇ"8eeg oߩ{˔)犧FKɖZ{"|G Uaؾ_#2U,N %I 0:O UN ^ w 4   m N# % U!> 0U 0> 0! 0 0 0^ 0 0 0e 0 0 0 0O 0 0 0D 0 0t 0 0 0 0A 0 0 0- 0 0W 0 0 0Q! 0>" 0M" 0E# 0'$ 0 % 0% 0& 0' 0i( 02;) 0m) 0:i* 0Y* 0_* 0 [+ 0e, 0- B*/ D/0 D+F0 0q0 D/w2 02 06t3 03 0:4 0^4 0<J5 1e5U65U*!6 1uK6 726 0c6 0NU77]<]< 0~_=E= 0D= B#>#>#>#> @>bP>P>P>:X>HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(@ Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,("  Z6Times New Roman RegularL1 h_B0CCA103|xU    ' ib011r90ib011r9 .   \  `&Times New Roman*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   0AA.Normal  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition T  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(hh&H1  5+ ` hp x 5      5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H2  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H3  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H4  5+ ` hp x 5 XXX 5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H5  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H6  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  2DD0Address  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted  /%  ,Kk %#/KJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/  <:zBottom of 7?(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?K%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7@(X75+ ` hp x 5  &  d d>)1dxd'dxd<:zTop of For7B(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?K%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7@(X75+ ` hp x 5  >)2dxd0KS.SampleKJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB   35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.<6X9`(Courier New%2A`Arial3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)Li)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  (O$  S($USUS.,    1    _DXXTenn.Code.Ann.section4035501(_i_)provides:    8  8`   (1)Thereshallbenoreleaseeligibilityforapersoncommittinganoffenseonor 2 afterJuly1,1995,thatisen#X2dXDe#DXX2dumeratedinsubdivision(2).Suchpersonshallserve C onehundredpercent(100%)ofthesentenceimposedbythecourtlesssentence  creditsearnedandretained.However,nosentencereductioncreditsauthorizedby u _ _Ԁ4121236,oranyotherprovisionoflaw,shalloperatetoreducethesentence 6  imposedbythecourtbymorethanfifteenpercent(15%). G` x` x 8  8`   (2)Theoffensestowhichtheprovisionsofsubdivision(1)applyare:...(I)Rapeof   achild....y  ` x` x    @  @`  @ http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?DB=4644&SerialNum=2000531088&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&ReferencePosition=911&AP(.(3($ !USUS.,      0  (#$  0   dSDU_4- - 0#Xd# [ !USUS.,  _XXXXiXX^@hh#XXi\#vXXINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#XXv#iXXԈ #    @  @` AssignedonBriefsAugust10,2004 F #XXid#iXX #XXi#iXXMICHAELD._OGUIN_Ԁ#XXi]##X2dXXX=#XXXX2diXXv.#XXi##X2dXXX#e* XX2di e*ԀKEVINMYERS,WARDEN#XXi# #X2dXXXǩ#XXXX2diXX  f #XXiD#0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforWayneCounty 7  @@No.131490 @ RobertHolloway,Judge ! q @@*AVT) ` dE<` A /  @@TTNo.M200302846CCAR3_HC_ԀFiledOctober12,_2004_ (  AVT) ` dE<` A      #X2dXXX%#ThePetitioner,MichaelD._OGuin_,pledguiltyin1998toonecountofchildrape,andthetrialcourt   sentencedthePetitionertofifteenyearsinprison,asaRangeIstandardoffender,atthirtypercent.  ThetrialcourtthenamendedtheoriginaljudgmentwithinthirtydaysandorderedthePetitioners v sentencetobeservedatonehundredpercent,withthepossibilityofafifteenpercentreduction _ basedonsentencereductioncredits.ThePetitionerfiledapetitionforawritofhabeascorpus,which H thetrialcourtdenied.Onappeal,thePetitionercontendsthatthetrialcourterredbydismissinghis 1 petitionbecausetheoriginaljudgmentwasvoid,makingtheamendedjudgmentalsovoid.After j reviewingtherecordandrelevantauthorities,weconcludethattheamendedjudgmentisnotvoid, S andthetrialcourtsdismissalofthepetitionisaffirmed. < XXXX2dV Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed     RobertW._Wedemeyer_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Welles#X2dXX#XXX2dand  #X2dXX#XXX2dNormaMcGeeOgle,JJ.,joined. z #X2dXXXn#KennethK._Crites_,_Centerville_,Tennessee,fortheappellant,MichaelD._OGuin_.XXXX2d L  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;RichardH._Dunavant_ԀandElizabethT.Ryan, "n! AssistantAttorneysGeneral;T.MichelBottoms,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,#X2dXXXǚ#XXXX2dfortheappellee,State #W" ofTennessee. #@# b@@OO& OPINION  %!%   #X2dXXX #@& I.Facts &!&    In1998,theLewisCountyGrandJuryindictedthePetitioner,MichaelD._OGuin_,onfifteen (#( countsofchildrape.ThePetitionerpledguiltytoonecountofchildrape,pursuanttoaplea h)$) agreement,and,onJune10,1998,thetrialcourtsentencedthePetitionertofifteenyearsinprison, Q*%* asaRangeIstandardoffender,atthirtypercent.Thetrialcourtamendedtheoriginaljudgmenton :+&+ July8,1998,andorderedthatthesentencebeservedatonehundredpercent,withthepossibilityof #,s', afifteenpercentreductionbasedonsentencereductioncredits.  -\(-  -E). ^ ^82dXXdd8[ ^  _  In2003,thePetitionerfiledapetitionforwritofhabeascorpusinwhichheallegedthatthe  sentenceimposedbythetrialcourtintheoriginaljudgmentwasanillegalsentencebecausethetrial  courtwaswithoutauthoritytosentencehimasaRangeIstandardoffenderwithathirtypercent  releaseeligibility.ThePetitionerclaimsthatthesentencewasnotastatutorilyauthorized k punishmentfortheoffenseofchildrape.ThetrialcourtdismissedthepetitiononOctober16,2003, T findingthatthePetitionersclaim,consideredinthelightmostfavorabletohim,wouldrenderhis =  convictionvoidableandnotvoidand,therefore,hewasnotentitledtohabeascorpusrelief.On & v appeal,thePetitionercontendsthatthetrialcourterredwhenitdeniedhispetitionforwritofhabeas  _ corpusbecausetheoriginaljudgmentwasvoidmakingtheamendedjudgmentalsovoidsince,  H accordingtoPetitioner, noamendmentcancureavoidjudgment.   x    1   X2dXXX2d@$II.Analysis   ____#X2dXXX2d-*#   X2dXXX2dArticleI,section15oftheTennesseeConstitutionguaranteesitscitizens% Z #X2dXXX2d*#%Z_+X2dXXX2dtherighttoseek   #X2dXXX2d+#X2dXXX2dhabeascorpusreliefandTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsections2921101etseq.codifytheapplicable p  proceduresforseekingawrit.However,thegroundsuponwhichourlawprovidesreliefarevery Y  narrow.Taylorv.State,995S.W.2d78,83(Tenn.1999).Awritforhabeascorpus willissueonly B whenitappearsuponthefaceofthejudgmentortherecordoftheproceedingsuponwhichthe +{ judgmentisrenderedthatacourtlackedjurisdictionorauthoritytosentenceadefendantorthatthe d sentencehasexpired.Stephensonv.Carlton,28S.W.3d910,911(Tenn.2000);seealso#X2dXXX2d,#X2dXXX2dԀArcher M v.State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993).#X2dXXX2d"/# Unlikethepostconvictionpetition,thepurposeofa 6 X2dXXX2dhabeascorpuspetitionistocontestvoidandnotmerelyvoidablejudgments.#X2dXXX2d0#X2dXXX2d_Potts_Ԁv.State,#X2dXXX2d0#X2dXXX2dԀ833  S.W.2d60,62(Tenn.1992)./#X2dXXX2d(1#X2dXXX2dԀTherefore,inordertostateacognizableclaimfor#X2dXXX2d1#X2dXXX2dhabeascorpusrelief,  thepetitionmustcontestavoidjudgment.#X2dXXX2d:2#X2dXXX2dId.#X2dXXX2d2#X2dXXX2dԀ Avoidjudgmentisoneinwhichthejudgmentis  faciallyinvalidbecausethecourtdidnothavethestatutoryauthoritytorendersuchjudgment...  .Avoidablejudgmentisonewhichisfaciallyvalidandrequiresproofbeyondthefaceoftherecord s orjudgmenttodemonstrateitsvoidableness.#X2dXXX2d(3#X2dXXX2dDykesv.Compton,#X2dXXX2d4#X2dXXX2dԀ978S.W.2d528,529(Tenn. \ 1998)(citing#X2dXXX2d>5#X2dXXX2dArcher,#X2dXXX2d5#X2dXXX2dԀ851S.W.2dat161).#X2dXXX2d6#X2dXXX2d1Ԁ#X2dXXX2dv6#X2dXXX2dAsentenceimposedindirectcontraventionofastatute E isillegalandtherefore#X2dXXX2d6# voidorvoidabledependinguponwhethertheillegalityofthesentenceis .~ evidentonthefaceofthejudgmentortherecordoftheunderlyingproceedings._McLaney_Ԁv.Bell, g 59S.W.3d90,94(Tenn.2001)(citingStephensonv.Carlton,28S.W.3d910,911(Tenn.2000)),  P seealsoStatev._Burkhart_,566S.W.2d871,873X2dXXX2dԀ#X2dXXX2dV9#(Tenn.1978).X2dXXX2dԀ  9   ThePetitionerbearstheburdenofshowingbyapreponderanceoftheevidencethatthe " ! convictionisvoidorthattheprisontermhasexpired._Passarella_Ԁv.State,891S.W.2d619,627 #" (Tenn._Crim_.App.1994),supercededbystatuteasstatedinStatev.Newman,No.02C019707CC $# 00266,1998WL104492,at*1n.2(Tenn._Crim_.App.,atJackson,Mar.11,1998),noperm.app. v% $ filed.Furthermore,theproceduralrequirementsforhabeascorpusreliefaremandatoryandmust _&!% bescrupulouslyfollowed.Archer,851S.W.2dat165.Becausethedeterminationofwhetherhabeas H'"& corpusreliefshouldbegrantedisaquestionoflaw,ourreviewisdenovowithnopresumptionof 1(#' correctness.Hartv.State,21S.W.3d901,903(Tenn.2000). )j$( __  ThePetitionercontendsthathissentenceisillegalbecauseitimproperlyplacedhis *<&* convictionofchildrapeasaRangeIstandardoffenderwithathirtypercentreleaseeligibility.He +%'+ correctlynotesthatTennCodeAnn.section4035501(_i_)(1)(1997)_P U#  1      _Ԁstatesthatthisconviction  requiresthesentencebeservedatonehundredpercent.#X2dXXX2d9#9TheStatecontendsthattheoriginal  judgmentisvoidable,ratherthanvoid,becausethetrialcourtenteredanamendedjudgment  correctingtheillegalsentence.TheStatefurtherassertsthat,accordingtotherecord,theamended k judgmentistheonethatholdsthePetitioner.X2dXXX2dԀWeagreewiththeState.#X2dXXX2dA#X2dXXX2dA T   ThisCourtheldin#X2dXXX2dKB#~BLambertv.Morgan,No.M200200172CCARMPC,2002WL445070 & v (Tenn._Crim_.App.,atNashville,Mar.22,2002),perm.app.denied(Tenn.Apr.24,2002),thata  _ sentencecontradictingastatutewasillegal.InLambert,X2dXXX2dthepetitionerpledguiltytoseconddegree  H murderandwassentencedtoservefifteenyearsasaRangeIstandardoffenderwitharelease  1  eligibilityofthirtypercent.Thepetitionerfiledapetitionforwritofhabeascorpusallegingthatthe    sentenceimposedwasillegalbecauseitwasnotstatutorilyauthorized.Sincethesentencedirectly   contradictedtherelevantstatute,thisCourtheldthatthesentencewasvoidandillegalandgranted   habeascorpusrelief.Therefore,accordingtoLamberttheoriginaljudgmentinthiscase,which   providedforanillegalsentence,wouldbevoid.However,thetrialcourtcorrectedthejudgmentby n  issuinganamendedjudgmentwithinthirtydaysbeforethejudgmentwasfinal,whichithas W  authoritytodo.SeeClarkv.State,No.W200400326CCAR3CD,2004WL1870059,at*2 @ (Tenn._Crim_.App.,atJackson,Aug.28,2004),noperm.app.filed.Theamendedjudgmentisthe )y judgmentbywhichthePetitionerisbeingheld.Itclearlyordersthecorrectsentenceandthecorrect K conviction,whichmeetsthestatutoryrequirements.Tenn.CodeAnn._ _Ԁ4035501(_i_)#X2dXXX2d5D#H(1),  ̀(_i_)(2)(I)(1997).  bJ I(03L?+ ` hp x X?4Q OO  5  9  _9K_  _9_  6KOOK  7 KX2dXXX2d   `     h III.0  Conclusion  7(#(# #X2dXXX2d%M# !!    Inaccordancewiththeforegoingauthoritiesandreasoning,weAFFIRMthetrialcourts  Ѐjudgment.  X2dXXX2d   `     h     #X2dXXX2dN#XXXX2d_   `     h     ___________________________________ T    `     h     ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE#X2dXXX?O#X2dXXX2dԀDM#X2dXXX2dP#