ÿWPCÆ  Yºdn­ikŸ6î¿]È| úuçâ[¤m)‹úk#ý\;åÿ&ñ7ײw —hAï*3(nYU”"à¹ÃŽÈþÞ—,ÁÝÅ#+L»¾TŒWsR¯“kÚñÆ,AqH^ø·èx¯,KJLxbxxÇû˜Ôô!ªø“ó2¨“·!M3A˜‚y0 —7Ç–ÁRdûA=—¬3Y[ c™OóKŒ 4Ãà¤õ9â„/á@s ¬ƒ¤F=¬üð½¨é<k+õœÿq»à¬ ØrÅSòïû ¶²Ò ÆÔ§à· À¤¼?r½ý‘‹#´V×}“°ûgðŒå¯'Vx¢I°NXü¿÷“zW]ðí˜~/b }Öpx-ÿ>8Ò’eK“>ø§ád ±';få!”aÙ²¼™¨†Aø%߉äl&üÄwHe›/@¢ßy§£eh}d¯jµš£žpÚùÁHþHõX7"ëtŒ²rÙç9îW;A¤àj9gxlOÌ4øÍ”ñè²Ï©„ÄR:÷|Ø|$W;~)íÏJJ´ÝÊè´¿ÑÐP¾ßgFÇC>t!vòÒØ…s•$Õé¼<¹ëuž"Í—ËÎiçÍîKvX>õ'èE<ÒFTó%Ÿ·¢Ê…\:b %\–b 0Ÿø UN— žå ƒ^ Ÿ z«Ò%w÷4ûÆ ÆæƬÆr m8NO#ÁQE 0D22222bvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv 0~~~~ B€€ 0» D3X D-‹ 0K¸¸ ASÆV 0» 0D× A« » ŒÝ ƒR½$ÝÔ  ÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôzÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€Although€the€judgment€appears€to€indicate€that€the€petitioner€pled€guilty€under€the€1982€Act,€we€note€thatÐ ° Ðhe€received€a€35%€release€eligibility€date,€which€was€not€an€option€under€the€1982€Act.€€The€release€eligibilityÐ n¾ Ðpercentage€for€a€Range€II€offender€under€the€1982€Act€was€40%,€while€the€release€eligibility€percentage€for€a€RangeÐ ,| ÐII€offender€under€the€1989€Act€is€35%.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„501(d)€(amended€1989),€40„35„501(d).€(wØI$¡¡Ô  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€..ÑÑ8€Å»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ýý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular ”Ý ƒR½$ÝÔ  ÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôzÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€We€note€that€due€toÔ‡XvLXòôzÔÔ€Ô#†ôzÔòXXvLž#Ôthe€ex€post€facto€provisions€of€the€Tennessee€and€United€States€constitutions,€a€petitionerÐ ° Ðsentenced€after€November€1,€1989€for€an€offense€committed€between€July€1,€1982€and€November€1,€1989€may€notÐ –æ Ðreceive€a€greater€punishment€than€he€or€she€would€have€received€under€the€1982€Act.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„117Ð T¤ Ðsentencing€commission€comments;€òòState€v.€Pearsonóó,€858€S.W.2d€879,€880€(Tenn.€1993).€€Thus,€ð ða€trial€court€imposingÐ b Ða€sentence€after€the€effective€date€of€the€1989€statute€for€a€crime€committed€before€that€date€must€calculate€theÐ Ð  Ðappropriate€sentence€under€both€the€1982€sentencing€statute€and€the€1989€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act,€and€thenÐ ŽÞ Ðimpose€the€lesser€sentence€of€the€two.ðð€€òòPearsonóó,€858€S.W.2d€at€880.€€In€this€particular€case,€however,€the€sentence€wasÐ L œ Ðan€agreed€sentence.€€We€see€no€reason€for€ex€post€facto€considerations€to€come€into€play€with€an€agreed€sentence,€soÐ  Z Ðlong€as€the€agreed€sentence€imposed€is€not€in€excess€of€the€maximum€potential€sentence€under€the€1982€Act.€€TheÐ È  Ðmaximum€potential€sentence€under€the€1982€Act€for€second€degree€murder€was€life€imprisonment,€or€sixty€years,€withÐ † Ö  Ða€release€eligibility€of€40%.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€39„2„212€(repealed€1989),€40„35„109(d)(1)€(repealed€1989),€40„Ð D ”  Ð35„501(d)€(amended€1989).€€Because€the€agreed€sentence€was€not€in€excess€of€this€maximum,€there€was€no€lawful€reasonÐ  R  Ðfor€the€trial€court€to€sentence€the€petitioner€under€the€1982€Act.€€€òòóó€€ Ý ƒR½$ÝÔ  ÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôzÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€The€petitioner's€thirty„five€year€sentence€for€robbery€by€use€of€a€deadly€weapon€could€not€be€reached€byÐ e Ðapplying€the€1989€Act.€€The€maximum€sentence€for€a€Class€B€felony€under€the€1989€Act€is€thirty€years.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€CodeÐ #¾ ÐAnn.€ðððð€40„35„111(b)(2),€40„35„112(c)(2).€€Thus,€this€sentence€was€clearly€outside€the€outer€limits€of€the€1989€Act.z¬œ)  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÖJ~'bk2ˆM¦3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0  Ñ e Ñ(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-(“G2½$¤¤Ý ƒØI!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€À»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôzÔò»»Ô d(“3R$££Ý ƒØI!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€À»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(“3R$¢¢Ý ƒØI!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€À»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒØI!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€À»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼À»»»ÔÑ8€vLXXdæ»»d8ÑÑ€(ïOÑà@ttìàÔ‡î$ÃÀÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼À»îî$Ã(#ԈРР ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€June€21,€2000Ð ð@ ÐÔ‡XvLX»¼ÀÔÌò òÔ#†¼À»XXvL:#Ô€MARK€E.€OLIVER€v.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEó óÐ ä4 ÐÌÔ€XvLX»¼ÀÔà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔHickmanÔ_Ô€CountyÐ  P Ðà@@øøìàNo.€99„5083C„I€€€€€€Timothy€L.€Easter,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<—` AßÐ ˜è  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M1999„02323„CCA„R3„PC€„€Filed€December€28,€2000Ð Ý  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<X` AßÐ Y©  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€petitioner,€Mark€E.€Oliver,€appeals€as€of€right€from€the€dismissal€of€his€petition€for€writ€ofÐ Nž  Ðhabeas€corpus.€€He€contends€that€his€original€sentence€of€sixty€years€as€a€Range€II€offender€for€theÐ 4„ Ðoffense€of€second€degree€murder€is€an€illegal€sentence€because€the€trial€court€was€withoutÐ j Ðjurisdiction€to€sentence€him€under€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1982.€€We€hold€that€theÐ P Ðtrial€court€lacked€jurisdiction€to€sentence€the€petitioner€under€the€1982€Act;€therefore,€the€sentenceÐ æ6 Ðimposed€is€an€illegal€sentence.€€We€remand€this€case€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedingsÐ Ì Ðconsistent€with€this€opinion.€Ð ² ÐÓËÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Reversedó óÐ ~Î ÐÌòòÓ  ÓJohn€Everett€Williams,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Wellesóó€andÐ Jš ÐòòJerry€L.€Smith,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð 0€ ÐÌMark€E.€Oliver,€Only,€Tennessee,€Pro€Se.Ð üL ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Marvin€E.€Clements,€Jr.,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ È ÐGeneral;€Ron€Davis,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Marvin€E.€Clements,€Jr.,€Assistant€DistrictÐ ® þ  ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ”!ä! ÐÓJÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òÌOPINIONó óÐ F$–$ ÐÌòòóóÓ  Óà  àThe€petitioner€was€originally€indicted€in€Davidson€County€on€one€count€of€premeditated€firstÐ &b!& Ðdegree€murder€for€an€offense€that€occurred€on€October€4,€1989.€€On€September€21,€1990,€he€pledÐ ø&H"' Ðguilty€to€one€count€of€second€degree€murder.€€Although€the€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing€isÐ Þ'.#( Ðnot€in€the€record,€it€appears€from€the€judgment€that€in€exchange€for€his€guilty€plea,€the€petitionerÐ Ä($) Ðreceived€a€sixty€year€sentence€as€a€Range€II€offender€with€a€release€eligibility€of€35%€of€his€sentence.€Ð ª)ú$* ÐIn€two€places,€the€judgment€reflects€that€the€petitioner€pled€guilty€"under€the€Old€Law,"€which€weÐ *à%+ Ðâ âinterpret€to€mean€he€pled€under€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1982€(hereinafter€the€1982Ð v+Æ&,ý¾ ÐÔ_ÔAct).׃×Ý ƒ)#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€petitioner€asserts€on€appeal€that€he€is€entitled€to€habeas€corpus€relief€because€his€sentenceÐ ° Ðâ âis€illegal;€he€argues€that€under€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989€(hereinafter€the€1989Ð –æ ÐAct),€which€was€in€effect€at€the€time€of€his€sentencing,€the€trial€court€lacked€jurisdiction€to€sentenceÐ |Ì Ðhim€under€the€1982€Act.€€We€agree.€€€€€Ð b² ÐÌà  àHabeas€corpus€relief€is€available€only€when€it€appears€upon€the€face€of€the€judgment€or€theÐ . ~ Ðrecord€of€the€proceedings€upon€which€the€judgment€is€rendered€that€a€court€lacked€jurisdiction€orÐ  d Ðauthority€to€sentence€a€petitioner€or€that€the€sentence€has€expired.€€€òòSeeóó€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2dÐ ú J Ð157,€164€(Tenn.€1993).€€Our€Supreme€Court€has€recognized€that€a€sentence€imposed€in€directÐ à 0 Ðcontravention€of€a€statute€is€void€and€illegal€and€thus€subject€to€habeas€corpus€relief.€€òòSeeóó€òòStephensonÐ Æ   Ðv.€Carltonóó,€__€S.W.3d€__,€__,€(Tenn.€2000).Ð ¬ ü  ÐÌà  àWhen€the€petitioner€was€sentenced,€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989€was€inÐ xÈ  Ðeffect.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„117.€€Pursuant€to€that€Act,€ð ð[u]nless€prohibited€by€the€UnitedÐ ^®  ÐStates€or€Tennessee€constitution,€any€person€sentenced€on€or€after€November€1,€1989,€for€an€offenseÐ D”  Ðcommitted€between€July€1,€1982€and€November€1,€1989,€shall€be€sentenced€under€the€provisions€ofÐ *z  Ðthis€[Act].ðð€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„117(b).€€Our€Supreme€Court€has€maintained€that€sentencing€is€jurisdictional,Ð ` Ðand€therefore€it€must€be€executed€in€compliance€with€the€1989€Act.€€òòMcConnell€v.€Stateóó,€12€S.W.3dÐ öF Ð795,€798€(Tenn.€2000).€€Because€the€petitioner€was€sentenced€after€November€1,1989€for€an€offenseÐ Ü, Ðwhich€occurred€prior€to€that€date,€the€statute€mandated€that€he€be€sentenced€pursuant€to€the€1989Ð Â ÐAct.׃ˆ×Ý ƒ)#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó;€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„117(b).€€Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àIn€òòMcConnellóó,€our€Supreme€Court€considered€a€similar€issue€to€the€one€here.€€There,€theÐ tÄ Ðpetitioner€pled€guilty€as€a€Range€I€offender€pursuant€to€a€plea€agreement€to€one€count€of€secondÐ Zª Ðdegree€murder€and€six€counts€of€robbery€by€use€of€a€deadly€weapon.€€òòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€796.€Ð @ ÐAlthough€the€offenses€occurred€in€January€1989,€the€petitioner€did€not€plead€guilty€until€NovemberÐ &v Ð20,€1990;€thus,€the€1989€Act€controlled€his€sentencing.€€òòId.óó€€In€exchange€for€his€pleas,€he€receivedÐ  \ Ða€thirty„five€year€sentence€for€second€degree€murder,€five€concurrent€ten€year€sentences€for€five€ofÐ òB Ðthe€robbery€by€use€of€a€deadly€weapon€counts,€and€a€thirty„five€year€sentence€for€the€sixth€robberyÐ ° Ðby€use€of€a€deadly€weapon€count,€to€be€served€consecutive€to€the€murder€conviction.€€òòId.óó€€TheseÐ –æ Ðsentence€calculations,€which€resulted€in€an€effective€sentence€of€seventy€years,€were€based€on€theÐ |Ì Ð1982€Act€rather€than€the€1989€Act.€€òòId.óó€€Under€the€1989€Act,€the€sentence€range€for€a€Range€IÐ b² Ðoffender€for€second€degree€murder,€a€Class€A€felony,€is€fifteen€to€twenty„five€years,€and€the€sentenceÐ H˜ Ðrange€for€a€Range€I€offender€for€robbery€by€use€of€a€deadly€weapon,€a€Class€B€felony,€is€eight€toÐ . ~ Ðtwelve€years.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó;€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„(a)(1)„(2).€€Thus,€the€Supreme€Court€held€that€underÐ  d Ðthe€1989€Act,€the€trial€court€was€without€jurisdiction€to€enter€thirty„five€year€sentences€for€a€RangeÐ ú J ÐI€offender€on€convictions€of€second€degree€murder€and€robbery€by€use€of€a€deadly€weapon€and€thatÐ à 0 Ðthe€sentences€imposed€on€the€petitioner€were€illegal.€€òòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€796,€800.€Ð Æ   ÐòòóóAccordingly,€it€reversed€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court€which€imposed€those€illegal€sentences.€€òòId.óóÐ ¬ ü  Ðat€800.€€€€€€Ð ’â  ÐÌà  àInterestingly,€the€Supreme€Court€in€òòMcConnellóó€cited€with€approval€its€prior€decision€in€òòHicksÐ ^®  Ðv.€Stateóó,€945€S.W.2d€706€(Tenn.€1997),€a€case€which€we€find€difficult€to€reconcile€with€òòMcConnellóó.€Ð D”  ÐòòSeeóó€òòid.óó€at€797„800.€€In€òòHicksóó,€the€Supreme€Court€approved€the€process€of€using€offenderÐ *z  Ðclassification€and€release€eligibility€as€plea€bargaining€tools.€€òòHicksóó,€945€S.W.2d€at€709.€€Thus,€inÐ ` Ðexchange€for€a€reduced€charge,€a€petitioner€could€plead€guilty€as€a€Range€II€offender€and€receive€aÐ öF ÐRange€II€sentence,€even€though€his€or€her€criminal€history€would€not€justify€a€Range€II€sentence.€Ð Ü, ÐòòSeeóó€òòid.óó€at€707.€€Similarly,€a€petitioner€could€plead€guilty€as€a€Range€II€offender€but€receive€theÐ Â Ðrelease€eligibility€of€a€Range€I€offender.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€at€708„09.€€The€Supreme€Court€held€that€"a€knowingÐ ¨ø Ðand€voluntary€guilty€plea€waives€any€irregularity€as€to€offender€classification€or€release€eligibility."€Ð ŽÞ ÐòòId.óó€at€709.€€Ð tÄ ÐÌÓ XÓÓ XÓAfter€citing€òòHicksóó€with€approval,€the€Supreme€Court€in€òòMcConnellóó€maintained€thatÐ @ Ðits€decision€today€in€no€way€alters€the€ability€of€the€State€and€petitioners€to€useÐ &v Ðoffender€classification€and€release€eligibility€as€subjects€of€plea€bargain€negotiations.€Ð  \ ÐThese€elements€of€plea€bargaining€have€been€and€still€are€properly€characterized€asÐ òB Ðnon„jurisdictional.€€However,€we€do€maintain€the€distinction€between€the€subjects€ofÐ Ø( Ðplea€bargaining€and€the€length€of€a€sentence.Ð ¾ ÐÓ XY$ÓÓ Xg$ÓÌòòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€798.€€The€court€asserted€that€the€"1989€Act€establishes€the€outer€limitsÐ Š Ú Ðwithin€which€the€State€and€a€petitioner€are€free€to€negotiate,€and€the€courts€are€bound€to€respect€thoseÐ p!À  Ðlimits."€€òòId.óó€at€799.€€Ð V"¦! ÐÌà  àAccepting€this€last€statement€as€true,€then€the€petitioner's€sentence€€in€òòMcConnellóó€for€secondÐ "$r# Ðdegree€murder€was€within€the€outer€limits€of€the€1989€Act,€and€it€would€have€been€a€permissibleÐ %X $ Ðresult€under€òòHicksóó.€€Although€his€thirty„five€year€sentence€was€not€permissible€under€Range€I,€whichÐ î%>!% Ðhas€a€sentence€range€of€fifteen€to€twenty„five€years,€the€same€result€could€have€been€reached€had€theÐ Ô&$"& Ðâ âpetitioner€pled€guilty€as€a€Range€II€offender,€which€has€a€sentence€range€of€twenty„five€to€fortyÐ º' #' ÐÑ(ïOÑâ (âÑe°Ñâ (âÑ  Ñyears.׃×Ý ƒ)#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(1),€(b)(1).€€Thus,€it€appears€the€distinction€is€that€theÐ e Ðâ âparties€couched€their€agreement€in€the€sentence€range€terms€of€the€1982€Act,€which€resulted€in€anÐ Kæ Ðillegal€sentence.€€Indeed,€the€Supreme€Court€in€òòMcConnellóó€stated€in€a€footnote,€"The€1989€Act€wasÐ 1Ì Ðclearly€applicable€when€appellant€pleaded€guilty€pursuant€to€the€plea€bargain€agreement€inÐ ² ÐNovember€1990.€€It€is€unclear€then€why€the€State€did€not€structure€the€plea€agreement€to€comply€withÐ ý˜ Ðthe€sentencing€guidelines€of€the€1989€Act€when€this€argument€impliedly€concedes€that€it€could€haveÐ ã~ Ðdone€so."€€òòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€800€n.€8€(citation€omitted).€€Therefore,€because€the€parties€statedÐ É d Ðin€the€plea€agreement€that€the€petitioner€was€pleading€guilty€as€a€Range€I€offender,€he€could€notÐ ¯ J Ðreceive€a€sentence€in€excess€of€the€Range€I€sentence€maximum€under€the€1989€Act.€€òòSeeóó€òòWilliamÐ • 0 ÐBoyd€v.€Stateóó,€No.€E1999„02179„CCA„R3„PC,€2000€WL€1661526,€at€*4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð {   ÐKnoxville,€Nov.€6,€2000)€(commenting,€"[I]t€is€immaterial€if€the€resulting€sentence€is€supportableÐ a ü  Ðas€an€offender„classification/release„eligibility€function€when€the€parties€expressed€their€agreementÐ Gâ  Ðin€extra„jurisdictional€terms.€€Under€this€view,€McConnell's€sentence€was€flawed€because€the€partiesÐ -È  Ðcouched€the€computation€as€an€illegal€function€of€the€1982€Act€.€.€.€.").Ð ®  ÐÌà  àLooking€now€at€the€case€at€hand,€the€Petitioner's€sentence€would€have€been€permissible€underÐ ßz  Ðthe€1989€Act€and€òòHicksóó€had€he€pled€guilty€as€a€Range€III€offender,€which€has€a€sentence€range€ofÐ Å` Ðforty€to€sixty€years,€with€a€Range€II€release€eligibility,€which€is€35%.€€òòSeeóó€òòHicksóó,€945€S.W.2d€at€709;Ð «F ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„112(c)(1),€40„35„501(d).€€However,€because€he€couched€his€agreementÐ ‘, Ðin€terms€of€the€1982€Act€and€pled€guilty€as€a€Range€II€offender,€the€maximum€sentence€he€couldÐ w Ðhave€lawfully€received€was€forty€years,€the€maximum€sentence€for€a€Range€II€offender€for€a€ClassÐ ]ø ÐA€felony€under€the€1989€Act.€€òòSeeóó€òòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€800;€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð CÞ Ð112(b)(1).€€Thus,€following€the€Supreme€Court's€dictate€in€òòMcConnellóó,€we€hold€that€the€Petitioner'sÐ )Ä Ðsentence€is€an€illegal€sentence€because€the€trial€court€lacked€jurisdiction€under€the€1989€Act€toÐ ª Ðsentence€the€Petitioner€as€a€Range€II€offender€to€sixty€years.€€Our€resolution€of€this€issue€leaves€theÐ õ ÐPetitioner's€case€pending€in€the€Criminal€Court€of€Davidson€County,€where€further€proceedings€areÐ Ûv Ðwarranted.€€Accordingly,€we€reverse€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€and€remand€this€case€to€theÐ Á\ ÐDavidson€County€Criminal€Court€for€further€proceedings.Ð §B Ðà  àÌÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð  "¦! Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOHN€EVERETT€WILLIAMS,€JUDGE