ÿWPCü 'UN2 %€ 0(†w@®4î 0ˆ™ 0D¡ 0Jå 0T/ 0^ƒ 0há 0rI 0|» 0†7 0½ 1uM 0dÂU>&U*dv~ŽvÓ Bß(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ ÎEÏÐÑ'eÒUÓUÔUÕEÖD×¼s¼$3|x×(8(2¢…$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÓ XÓÓ XÓà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô  ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(ArialPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò dÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÓ  ÓÔ€ÔÑ\R AØ'\Ñ›Ñ7€~ÖXXdðdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÞ ÞÌà@ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@ àAT€NASHVILLEÌÌà@ àJUNE€1998€SESSIONÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,ó óà@ à)Ìà@ à)à àò òNO.€01C01„9706„CC„00233ó óÌà àAppellee,à@ à)Ìà@ à)à àò òWILLIAMSON€COUNTYó óÌò òVS.ó óà@ à)Ìà@ à)à àò òHON.€DONALD€P.€HARRIS,ÌJAGATH€N.€PARACHURI,ó óà@ à)à àò òJUDGEó óÌà@ à)Ìà àAppellant.à@ à)à à(Probation€Revocation)ÌÌÌÌÒ†„èyÒò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:ÌÌTHOMAS€L.€WHITESIDEÌó ó172€Second€Ave€NorthÌSuite€214ÌNashville,€TN€37201„1908Éò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPó óÌAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌÌò òDEBORAH€A.€TULLISó óÌAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌCordell€Hull€Building,€2nd€FloorÌ425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌò òJOSEPH€D.€BAUGH,€JR.ó óÌDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌWilliamson€County€CourthouseÌSuite€G„6ÌP.O.€Box€937ÌFranklin,€TN€37065„0937ÌÌÌÉÒÒÌÌÌÌÌÌò òOPINION€FILED:€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌÌÌÌREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDÌÌÌÌJOE€G.€RILEY,ÌJUDGEÇÓ  ÓÓÓOPINIONó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€defendant,€Jagath€N.€Parachuri,€appeals€the€order€of€the€WilliamsonÏCounty€Circuit€Court€revoking€his€probation.€€Since€we€conclude€the€courtÏimproperly€modified€the€original€sentences,€we€REVERSE€AND€REMAND€theÏcase€to€the€Williamson€County€Circuit€Court€for€entry€of€proper€judgments€andÏany€further€proceedings€consistent€with€this€opinion.ÌÌÓ  Óò òòòI.ó óóóÓ  ÓÌà àThe€record€prepared€for€appeal€in€this€case€falls€seriously€short€of€theÏrequirements€of€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(a).€€The€probation€revocation€hearingÏfocused€on€the€dates€of€the€defendantððs€prior€arrests€and€convictions.€€AlthoughÏvarious€judgments€were€made€exhibits,€these€judgments€were€not€included€inÏthe€record€on€appeal.€€Ordinarily€we€would€affirm€based€upon€an€inadequateÏrecord,€or€order€the€record€to€be€supplemented.€€We€believe,€however,€thatÏsufficient€information€can€be€gleaned€from€the€trial€courtððs€findings€to€determineÏthat€a€remand€is€in€order.ÌÌà àThe€defendant€appears€to€have€been€arrested€for€burglary€in€DavidsonÏCounty€on€July€27,€1994,€and€released€on€bail€August€7,€1994.€€In€the€nextÏseveral€months,€while€on€bond€for€the€Davidson€County€burglary€charge,€theÏdefendant€apparently€also€committed€offenses€in€Williamson€County€which€ledÏto€indictments€for€five€(5)€counts€of€forgery€and€one€(1)€count€of€failure€to€appear.ÍThe€defendant€was€also€charged€in€Davidson€County€with€aggravated€burglary.€ÏWe€are€only€able€to€determine€that€this€offense€was€committed€sometime€prior€toÏNovember€22,€1994.ÌÌà àThe€defendant€was€convicted€and€sentenced€for€the€Williamson€CountyÏoffenses€first.€€Williamson€County,€therefore,€became€the€first€sentencing€court.€ÏOn€May€15,€1995,€the€defendant€was€sentenced€in€Williamson€County€toÏconcurrent€two€(2)€year€terms€for€the€forgery€charges€consecutive€to€a€one€(1)Ïyear€term€for€the€failure€to€appear,€yielding€an€effective€three„year€sentence.€ÏThe€sentences€were€suspended,€and€the€defendant€was€placed€on€probation.€€ÌÌà àShortly€after€the€Williamson€County€sentencing,€the€defendant€wasÏsentenced€in€Davidson€County€to€Community€Corrections€for€consecutive€termsÏof€two€(2)€years€for€the€burglary€charge€and€three€(3)€years€for€aggravatedÏburglary.€€Davidson€County,€therefore,€became€the€second€sentencing€court.€ÏThe€defendant€alleges€that€the€Davidson€County€sentences€ran€concurrent€withÏthe€Williamson€County€sentences,€and€the€Davidson€County€court€was€aware€ofÏhis€Williamson€County€offenses€at€the€time€of€sentencing;€however,€we€areÏunable€to€verify€this€allegation€absent€a€proper€record.ÌÌà àIn€May€1996,€while€on€probation€in€Williamson€County€and€CommunityÏCorrections€in€Davidson€County,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€driving€under€theÏinfluence€of€an€intoxicant€in€Davidson€County€and€was€sentenced.€€As€a€result,Íthe€defendantððs€Community€Corrections€sentences€in€Davidson€County€wereÏrevoked,€and€he€was€remanded€to€serve€his€effective€five„year€Davidson€CountyÏsentences.€€There€is€nothing€in€the€record€to€indicate€whether€the€DavidsonÏCounty€court€made€any€reference€to€the€Williamson€County€sentences..ÌÌà àOn€March€24,€1997,€the€Williamson€County€court€found€the€defendantÏviolated€the€terms€of€his€probation€by€the€being€convicted€of€the€DUI€inÏDavidson€County.€€The€Williamson€County€court€revoked€the€defendantððsÏprobation.€€For€purposes€of€the€revocation,€the€Williamson€County€court€found€itÏwas€the€second€sentencing€court€since€Davidson€County€had€already€revokedÏCommunity€Corrections€and€ordered€confinement.€€The€Williamson€CountyÏcourt€ordered€the€Williamson€County€sentences€served€consecutive€to€theÏDavidson€County€burglary€conviction€because€it€found€the€defendant€had€beenÏreleased€on€bail€for€that€Davidson€County€offense€when€the€Williamson€CountyÏoffenses€were€originally€committed.ÌÌà àThe€defendant€contests€the€Williamson€County€courtððs€authority€to€alterÏthe€consecutive/concurrent€nature€of€his€sentences.€€We€agree€with€theÏdefendantððs€contentions.ÌÌÓ  Óò òòòII.ÌÓ  Óó óóóÌà àConsecutive€sentencing€is€addressed€in€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c).€€TheÍWilliamson€County€court€at€the€revocation€hearing€found€the€defendantÏcommitted€the€original€offenses€in€Wiliamson€County€after€he€had€beenÏreleased€on€bail€in€Davidson€County€for€the€burglary€charge.€€The€WilliamsonÏCounty€court€at€the€revocation€hearing€found,€therefore,€that€it€was€required€toÏorder€consecutive€sentences.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(3)€provides:ÌÒ ` ÒÒ  ÒÓÓ(3)€Mandatory€Consecutive€Sentences.€€Where€a€defendant€isÏconvicted€of€multiple€offenses€from€one€trial€or€where€theÏdefendant€has€additional€sentences€not€yet€fully€served€as€theÏresult€of€the€convictions€in€the€same€or€other€court€and€the€lawÏrequires€consecutive€sentences,€the€sentence€shall€beÏconsecutive€whether€the€judgment€explicitly€so€orders€or€not.€€ThisÏrule€shall€apply:ÌÌà à(A)€To€a€sentence€for€a€felony€committed€while€on€parole€forÏà à€€€€€€a€felony;Ìà àÌà à(B)€To€a€sentence€for€escape€or€for€a€felony€committed€while€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïon€escape;ÌÌà à(C)€òòTo€a€sentence€for€a€felony€where€the€defendant€was€à àóó€€€€€Ïòòreleased€on€bail€and€the€defendant€is€convicted€of€both€à àóó€€€€€Ïòòoffensesóó;€andÌÌà à(D)€Any€other€ground€provided€by€law.ÌÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÓÓÌ(emphasis€added).ÌÌà àThe€defendant€was€convicted€and€sentenced€for€the€€Williamson€CountyÏoffenses€first.€€When€the€defendant€was€subsequently€sentenced€in€DavidsonÏCounty,€the€trial€court€in€Davidson€County€could€have€noted€the€WilliamsonÏCounty€convictions€were€the€result€of€offenses€committed€there€while€on€bailÏfrom€Davidson€County€and€ordered€the€Davidson€County€sentences€servedÍconsecutively€to€the€Williamson€County€sentences.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.Ï32(c)(3)(C).€€The€fact€that€the€Davidson€County€offense€was€òòcommitted€firstóó,€yetÏDavidson€County€was€the€òòsecond€sentencing€courtóó,€would€not€prohibitÏDavidson€County€from€running€its€sentences€consecutive€to€the€WilliamsonÏCounty€sentences€as€required€by€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(3)(C).€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.ÏBlantonóó,€926€S.W.2d€953,€961€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€ÌÌÓ  Óò òòòIII.ÌÓ  Óó óóóÌà àWhile€it€appears€the€Williamson€County€court€was€correct€in€itsÏdetermination€that€the€defendant€should€be€required€to€serve€the€WilliamsonÏCounty€sentences€and€the€Davidson€County€burglary€sentence€consecutively,Ïthe€Williamson€County€court€had€no€authority€to€so€order.€€Williamson€CountyÏwas€the€first€sentencing€court€and,€at€the€time€of€the€original€sentencing€inÏWilliamson€County,€could€not€and€did€not€order€the€Williamson€CountyÏsentences€to€run€consecutively€to€a€yet€to€be€imposed€Davidson€CountyÏsentence.€€Thus,€the€original€sentence€imposed€by€Williamson€County€wasÏcorrect€in€making€no€reference€to€the€Davidson€County€pending€cases.ÌÌÓ  Óò òòòIV.ÌÓ  Óó óóóÌà àThe€options€available€to€a€trial€court€upon€revocation€of€probation€areÏlimited€by€statute.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(d)€provides:ÌÒ ` ÒÒ  ÒÓÓÌà àIf€the€trial€judge€should€find€that€the€defendant€has€violatedÏthe€conditions€of€his€probation€and€suspension€by€aÏpreponderance€of€the€evidence,€the€trial€judge€shall€have€the€rightÏby€order€duly€entered€upon€the€minutes€of€his€court,€to€revoke€theÏprobation€and€suspension€of€sentence€and€cause€the€defendant€toÏòòcommence€the€execution€of€judgment€as€originally€enteredóó,€orÏotherwise€in€accordance€with€ðð€40„35„310;€provided,€that€in€caseÏof€such€revocation€of€probation€and€suspension,€the€defendantÏhas€the€right€to€appeal.ÌÌÌÒ  ÒÒ ° Ò(emphasis€added).ÌÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310€provides:ÌÌÌÒ ` ÒÒ  Òà àThe€trial€judge€possess€the€power,€at€any€time€within€theÏmaximum€time€which€was€directed€and€ordered€by€the€court€forÏsuch€suspension,€after€proceeding€as€provided€in€ðð€40„35„311,€toÏrevoke€and€annul€such€suspension,€and€in€such€cases€òòthe€originalÏjudgment€so€rendered€by€the€trial€judge€shall€be€in€full€force€andÏeffect€óófrom€the€date€of€the€revocation€of€such€suspension,€and€shallÏbe€executed€accordingly;€provided,€that€in€any€case€of€revocationÏof€suspension€on€account€of€conduct€by€the€defendant€which€hasÏresulted€in€a€judgment€of€conviction€against€him€during€his€periodÏof€probation,€the€trial€judge€may€order€that€the€term€ofÏimprisonment€imposed€by€the€original€judgment€be€servedÏconsecutively€to€any€sentence€which€was€imposed€upon€suchÏconviction.ÌÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÓÓÌ(emphasis€added).ÌÌThus,€ð ða€trial€court€that€determines€that€a€probation€violation€has€occurred€canÏcause€execution€of€the€òòoriginal€judgment€as€it€was€originally€enteredóó,€òòseeóó€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310,€„311,€or€can€modify€the€defendantððs€conditions€ofÏsupervision,€including€extending€the€defendantððs€probationary€period€for€up€toÍtwo€years.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„308.ðð€€òòState€v.€Bowlingóó,€958€S.W.2dÏ362,€363€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997)(emphasis€added).ÌÌà àUnder€our€revocation€statutes€a€trial€court€does€not€have€the€authority€toÏalter€the€original€sentence€to€run€it€consecutive€to€another€sentence€except€forÏan€offense€committed€while€on€probation.€€When€a€trial€court€finds€a€defendantÏviolated€the€terms€of€his€probation,€the€trial€court€has€the€right€to€revoke€theÏprobation€and€ð ðcause€the€defendant€to€commence€the€execution€of€judgment€òòasÏoriginally€enteredò òóó€ó ó.€.€.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(d)(emphasis€added).€€TheÏWilliamson€County€trial€courtððs€only€determination€of€consecutive€sentencing€isÏto€the€triggering€offense€upon€which€the€revocation€is€based.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€œCodeÌÌ›€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310.€€That€determination€is€discretionary€with€the€trial€court€underÏthis€statute.ÌÌÓ  Óò òòòV.ÌÓ  Óóóó óÌà àIf€the€Williamson€County€offenses€were€committed€when€the€defendantÏwas€on€bail€for€the€Davidson€County€burglary€charge,€we€agree€that€theÏWilliamson€County€sentence€and€the€Davidson€County€burglary€sentenceÏshould€have€run€consecutively€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(3)(C).€€ThisÏshould€have€been€done€by€the€Davidson€County€court€at€the€time€it€originallyÏsentenced€the€defendant.€€However,€this€cannot€be€done€by€Williamson€CountyÍupon€revocation€of€probation.ÌÌà àWe€know€not€whether€the€proper€facts€were€made€known€to€the€DavidsonÏCounty€court€at€the€time€of€the€original€sentence€there€or€at€its€revocationÏhearing.€€We€voice€no€œopinion›€as€to€the€propriety€of€Davidson€County€amendingÏits€sentences€as€those€cases€are€not€before€us€on€appeal.ÌÌÓ  Óò òòòVI.ó óóóÌÓ  ÓÌà àAlthough€not€raised€by€the€parties,€we€note€that€the€revocation€orderÏcontains€errors€as€to€the€consecutive/concurrent€nature€of€the€six€(6)€WilliamsonÏCounty€convictions.€€The€revocation€order€runs€one€(1)€forgery€count€concurrentÏwith€the€failure€to€appear€and€the€other€four€(4)€forgery€counts€consecutive€to€theÏother€two€(2)€counts.€€This€does€not€appear€consistent€with€the€originalÏjudgments,€œno›œr›€does€it€appear€to€be€consistent€with€the€intentions€of€the€trialÏcourt.€€The€confusion€appears€to€have€arisen€from€improper€matching€ofÏconvictions€with€docket€numbers.̛̜ÌÓ  Óò òòòVII.ó óóóÌÌÓ  Óà àUpon€remand,€the€trial€court€shall€enter€an€order€simply€reinstating€theÏoriginal€sentences€without€any€reference€to€the€Davidson€County€sentences.€ÍFurther,€there€should€be€no€alteration€from€the€original€judgments€as€to€how€theÏsix€(6)€Williamson€County€sentences€will€be€served€in€relation€to€each€other.€€AsÏwe€understand€those€judgments,€all€forgery€counts€run€concurrent€with€eachÏother,€but€the€failure€to€appear€count€runs€consecutive€for€an€effective€sentenceÏof€three€(3)€years.€€These€sentences€also€run€concurrent€with€the€triggeringÏDavidson€County€DUI€since€the€trial€court€did€not€specify€a€consecutiveÏsentence.ÌÌÓ  Óò òòòCONCLUSIONÌÓ  Óó óóóÌà àThis€case€is€REVERSED€AND€REMANDED€for€entry€of€proper€judgmentsÏand€any€further€proceedings€consistent€with€this€opinion.ÌÌÌÓÓÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌÌ__________________________ÌCURWOOD€WITT,€JUDGEó óÌÌÌÌÌÌÌ__________________________Ìò òLEE€MOORE,€SPECIAL€JUDGEó ó