ÿWPC# hàOPÊ–ÚÌú°‡%.±–V—6BLA½÷»Õ¾Ï*b§C¸ÇÄÏÑVá?+¯Y•ÞJfÔç®Î8*ûÓ¡¯Uë%e’BLöŠ—øå(¦+N_tvÒ¯]y¦“îg+T¶ëK°·FÉÕ:²h¹M*–T*·ã02‹ì -ÂÁ†Bʪ ŽîÂÿfúÜEE8Óº5QÝ *yJ¯›ÏXƒuœpb %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ 1‡‘ Æ ÆÞ Ƥ ÆjU @0Np 1‡r 72ùE+ 1u- 72¢ 0cÔ 1‡7 72¾ð 1‡ø 0D 72à 0¤õ 1‡™ 1‡  72§ 1‡Ù 72` 0w’ 1  72– 1‡È 72O 1 72 72@br 1‡z 72 1‡3 72º 1‡ì 72s 1‡¥ 1‡, 72³ 72å 72 1‡I 72Ð 1‡ 72‰‰UN»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» 0ë     Bôô 0¤ D5µ D-ê 0K  ASb Ƶ 0¤{! 0D" A«c"»&wf)L (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular7f<)ogram Files3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(ŠùEGMSY_ekqAutoList16A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman (нCEKQW]cioAutoList1A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à(š½CEKQW]cioAutoList2A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A. (ª½CEKQW]cioAutoList3A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóA.(|3N{$§§Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ð»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý( ¾CEKQW]cioAutoList9A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(º½CEKQW]cioAutoList4A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A."A.0³CEKSY_ekqAutoList5A.(1)A.A.A.A.A.A.$A.(Oé;$µµà0  àÔ2#ÔÚ  ÚaÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0` (#(#à(öÙCEMU]emu}AutoList6(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)'(1)(ê½CEKQW]cioAutoList7A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.)A.(ÚCEMU]emu}AutoList8(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)+(1)!A.- ù-(*ùEGMSY_ekqAutoList10A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A./A.(:ùEGMSY_ekqAutoList11A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.1A.(JùEGMSY_ekqAutoList12A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.3A.(jùEGMSY_ekqAutoList14A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(ZùEGMSY_ekqAutoList13A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.6A. A.5A.(zùEGMSY_ekqAutoList15A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.:A.(šùEGMSY_ekqAutoList17A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.<A.(uHš Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(|G2m‘$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ð»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€Xh|X»»Ô d(|3N{$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ð»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3N{$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ð»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€0»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼0»»»ÔÑ8€x¼XXdæ»»d8ÑÓÓÓÓÔ‡¼0»»¼0Ôà@HHìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@''%ìàAT€JACKSONˆÐ ¾ ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€August€8,€2000Ð Ì ÐÔ‡Xx¼X»¼0ÔÌò òÔ#†¼0»XXx¼î#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€òòóóFREDERICK€PARKSó óÐ À ÐÌÔ‡Xx¼X»¼0Ôà@@â â ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Madison€CountyÐ Ü , Ðà@@@ @ ìàNo.€96„426€€€Roy€B.€Morgan,€Jr.,€JudgeÔ#†¼0»XXx¼~#ÔÐ   ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Ã` AßÐ Ä  ÐÔ‡Xx¼X»¼0ÔÌà@@æ æ ìàNo.€W1999„01357„CCA„R3„CD€Ô#†¼0»XXx¼Ò#Ô„€Ô€Xx¼X»¼0ÔFiled€October€27,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ ¹  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<¬` AßÐ ­ý  Ðó óÌÓôÓÔ_ÔÔ#†Xx¼XXXx¼#ÔÔ_ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÔ‡@Xx¼XXXx¼ÔÓÓDefendant,€Frederick€Parks,€was€found€guilty€by€a€Madison€County€jury€of€one€count€of€burglaryÐ ¢ò  Ðand€one€count€of€theft€over€$500,€for€which€he€received€consecutive€sentences€of€four€years€and€twoÐ ˆØ Ðyears,€respectively.€€The€jury€also€fined€the€defendant€$750,€and€the€trial€court€ordered€the€defendantÐ n¾ Ðto€pay€$1500€in€restitution.€€On€appeal,€the€defendant€raises€two€issues:€1)€whether€the€evidenceÐ T¤ Ðpresented€at€trial€was€sufficient€to€support€his€convictions;€and€2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€byÐ :Š Ðimposing€consecutive€sentences€on€the€defendant.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€Ô_Ôaffirmed.Ô#†Xx¼XX@Xx¼y#ÔÔ‡Xx¼XXXx¼ÔÔ_ÔÐ  p ÐÓmÓÌò òÓ  ÓTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ ì< ÐÌòòÓ  ÓJohn€Everett€Ô_ÔWilliamsóó,Ô_Ô€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.€andÐ ¸ ÐJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔwittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€J.óó,€joined.Ð žî ÐÌClifford€K.€Ô_ÔMcGownÔ_Ô,€Ô_ÔWaverlyÔ_Ô;€George€Morton€Ô_ÔGoogeÔ_Ô,€District€Public€Defender;€Stephen€P.Ð jº ÐÔ_ÔSpracherÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€Public€Ô_ÔDefenders,Ô_Ô€for€the€appellant,€Frederick€Parks.Ð P  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Mark€E.€Davidson,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð  l ÐJames€G.€(Jerry)€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Shaun€A.€Brown,€Assistant€DistrictÐ !R  ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð è!8! Ðò òÓ  ÓÌÌÔ_ÔÔ#†Xx¼XXXx¼’#ÔÔ‡@Xx¼XXXx¼ÔOPINIONó óÔ_ÔÐ š$ê$ ÐÌÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant,€Frederick€Parks,€was€indicted€on€one€count€of€burglary€and€one€count€of€theftÐ f&¶!& Ðover€$1000.€€A€Madison€County€jury€convicted€the€defendant€of€one€count€of€burglary€and€one€countÐ L'œ"' Ðof€theft€over€$500,€and€fined€him€$750.€€The€defendant€received€consecutive€sentences€of€four€yearsÐ 2(‚#( Ðand€two€years,€respectively,€and€was€ordered€to€pay€$1500€in€restitution.€€The€defendant€challenges:Ð )h$) Ð1)€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€to€support€his€convictions;€and€2)€the€trial€courtððs€imposition€ofÐ þ)N%* Ðconsecutive€Ô_Ôsentences.Ô_Ô€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€Ô_ÔÔ_ÔÐ ä*4&+ ÐÓ  Óòòò òÌÌÐ –-æ(.ý' ÐÔ_ÔFACTSó óóóÐ ° ÐÌÓ  Óà  àIn€September€1995,€the€defendant€was€employed€by€a€temporary€employment€agency.€Ð |Ì ÐThrough€the€temporary€employment€agency€the€defendant€was€assigned€to€work€at€Jackson€MetalÐ b² ÐServices,€Inc.€€Sometime€during€the€night€of€September€16,€1995,€and€the€early€morning€hours€ofÐ H˜ ÐSeptember€17,€1995,€Jackson€Metal€Services,€Inc.€was€burglarized.€€During€the€burglary€two€doorsÐ . ~ Ðleading€inside€the€building€and€several€desk€drawers€were€pried€open.€€In€addition€to€the€damageÐ  d Ðdone€to€the€doors€and€desk€drawers,€the€office€was€ð ðransacked.ðð€€It€was€later€discovered€that€severalÐ ú J Ðchecks€and€two€two„way€radios€were€taken€during€the€burglary.€€At€least€one€of€the€checks€stolenÐ à 0 Ðduring€the€burglary€was€a€payroll€check.€€€Ð Æ   ÐÌà  àAround€the€time€of€the€burglary€the€defendant€borrowed€some€money€from€an€acquaintance.€Ð ’â  ÐIn€return,€the€defendant€gave€the€acquaintance€an€endorsed€payroll€check€drawn€by€Jackson€MetalÐ xÈ  ÐServices,€Inc.€and€made€out€to€a€sales€representative€employed€at€Jackson€Metal€Services,€Inc.€€TheÐ ^®  Ðdefendant€told€the€acquaintance€that€if€he€did€not€return€with€her€money€by€a€certain€day€she€couldÐ D”  Ðcash€the€check.€€The€acquaintance€asked€if€the€check€was€stolen€and€the€defendant€replied€that€it€wasÐ *z  Ðnot.€€The€defendant€further€stated€that€the€check€was€given€to€him€by€the€person€the€check€was€madeÐ ` Ðout€to.€€Subsequently,€a€friend€of€the€acquaintance€attempted€to€cash€the€check€for€the€acquaintance.€Ð öF ÐWhen€the€check€was€presented€to€the€bank€for€payment,€a€records€check€done€by€the€bank€revealedÐ Ü, Ðthat€the€check€was€stolen.€€The€bank€retained€the€check€and€contacted€the€police.€€Ð  ÐÌà  àThe€police€subsequently€talked€to€the€acquaintance€and€instructed€her€to€contact€them€whenÐ ŽÞ Ðshe€saw€the€defendant€again.€€Shortly€thereafter,€the€defendant€rented€a€room€from€her€and€the€policeÐ tÄ Ðwere€notified.€€The€defendant€was€later€arrested.€€Ð Zª ÐÌÓ  Óòòò òÌSUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEÐ  \ ÐÌó óóóÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€evidence€presented€at€trial€was€insufficient€to€support€hisÐ Ø( Ðconvictions€for€burglary€and€theft€over€$500.€€We€disagree.€Ð ¾ ÐÌÓ€ <(šù83ÓÓ  ÓòòStandard€of€ReviewóóÐ Š Ú ÐÓÄÓÌà  àAlthough€the€evidence€of€the€defendantððs€guilt€is€circumstantial€in€nature,€circumstantialÐ V"¦! Ðevidence€alone€may€be€sufficient€to€support€a€conviction.€€òòState€v.€Tharpeóó,€726€S.W.2d€896,€899„900Ð <#Œ" Ð(Tenn.€1987);€€òòState€v.€Gregoryóó,€862€S.W.2d€574,€577€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€However,€in€orderÐ "$r# Ðfor€this€to€occur,€the€circumstantial€evidence€must€be€not€only€consistent€with€the€guilt€of€the€accusedÐ %X $ Ðbut€it€must€also€be€inconsistent€with€innocence€and€must€exclude€every€other€reasonable€theory€orÐ î%>!% Ðhypothesis€except€that€of€guilt.€€òòTharpeóó,€726€S.W.2d€at€900.€€€In€addition,€ð ðit€must€establish€such€aÐ Ô&$"& Ðcertainty€of€guilt€of€the€accused€as€to€convince€the€mind€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€[theÐ º' #' Ðdefendant]€is€the€one€who€committed€the€crime.ðð€€òòId.óó€(quoting€òòPruitt€v.€Stateóó,€460€S.W.2d€385,€390Ð  (ð#( Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1970)).Ð †)Ö$) Ðà  àÌà  àWhile€following€the€above€guidelines,€this€Court€must€remember€that€the€jury€decides€theÐ R+¢&+ Ðweight€to€be€given€to€circumstantial€evidence€and€that€ð ð[t]he€inferences€to€be€drawn€from€suchÐ 8,ˆ', Ðevidence,€and€the€extent€to€which€the€circumstances€are€consistent€with€guilt€and€inconsistent€withÐ ° Ðinnocence€are€questions€primarily€for€the€jury.ðð€€òòMarable€v.€Stateóó,€313€S.W.2d€451,€457€(Tenn.Ð –æ Ð1958);€òòsee€alsoóó€€òòGregoryóó,€862€S.W.2d€at€577;€òòState€v.€Couryóó,€697€S.W.2d€373,€377€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð |Ì ÐApp.€1985);€òòPruittóó,€460€S.W.2d€at€391.Ð b² ÐÌòòÓ  ÓAnalysisóóÐ . ~ ÐÓÚ"ÓÌà  àAt€trial€the€defendantððs€guilt€was€established€by€circumstantial€evidence.€€Testimony€wasÐ ú J Ðgiven€by€one€witness€that€sometime€during€the€night€of€September€16,€1995,€and€the€early€morningÐ à 0 Ðhours€of€September€17,€1995,€Jackson€Metal€Services,€Inc.€was€burglarized.€€Among€the€items€takenÐ Æ   Ðduring€the€burglary€was€a€check€in€the€amount€of€$122.96€made€out€to€Kevin€Robertson,€a€salesmanÐ ¬ ü  Ðemployed€by€Jackson€Metal€Services,€Inc.€€Other€checks€were€also€taken€€in€addition€to€two€two„wayÐ ’â  Ðradios.€€The€same€witness€also€testified€that€two€doors€leading€into€different€parts€of€the€building€andÐ xÈ  Ðsome€desk€drawers€in€the€office€had€been€pried€open.€€€Ð ^®  ÐÌà  àTestimony€given€by€a€police€officer€established€that€the€check€made€out€to€Kevin€RobertsonÐ *z  Ðfor€$122.96€(hereinafter€ð ðthe€checkðð)€was€recovered€on€September€21,€1995,€after€an€individualÐ ` Ðattempted€to€cash€it€at€a€local€bank.€€The€police€officer€further€testified€that€the€owner€reported€thatÐ öF Ðthe€check€had€been€taken€during€the€September€16€or€17,€1995,€burglary.€Ð Ü, ÐÌà  àAnother€witness,€who€worked€as€a€bank€teller,€testified€that€shortly€after€the€burglary€she€wasÐ ¨ø Ðworking€when€the€check€was€presented€to€her€for€payment.€Upon€looking€through€the€bankððsÐ ŽÞ Ðcomputer€records€the€witness€found€that€the€check€had€been€reported€as€being€stolen.€€The€witnessÐ tÄ Ðtestified€that€the€person€who€attempted€to€cash€the€check€was€a€regular€customer€at€the€bank.€€WhenÐ Zª Ðpolice€contacted€the€person€who€attempted€to€cash€the€check€she€told€police€that€a€friend€had€askedÐ @ Ðher€to€take€the€check€to€the€bank.Ð &v Ѐ€€€€€€€€Ð  \ Ðà  àThe€person€who€asked€her€friend€to€take€the€check€to€the€bank€for€her€also€testified€againstÐ òB Ðthe€defendant.€€This€witness€testified€that€she€originally€received€the€check€from€the€defendantÐ Ø( Ðsometime€during€September€1995.€€At€trial€the€witness€testified€that€the€defendant€gave€her€the€checkÐ ¾ Ðin€return€for€some€money€she€had€lent€the€him.€€The€witness€further€testified€that€the€defendant€toldÐ ¤ô Ðher€she€could€cash€the€check€if€he€did€not€return€with€her€money€by€a€certain€day.€€When€the€witnessÐ Š Ú Ðasked€the€defendant€if€the€check€was€stolen,€the€defendant€said€that€it€was€not.€€The€defendant€furtherÐ p!À  Ðstated€that€the€person€who€the€check€was€made€out€to€had€given€him€the€check€in€partial€repaymentÐ V"¦! Ðof€a€debt€he€owed€the€defendant.€€The€defendant€stated€that€the€person€who€the€check€was€made€outÐ <#Œ" Ðto€had€done€this€on€prior€occasions.Ð "$r# ÐÌà  àThe€person€who€the€check€was€made€out€to€also€testified.€€This€witness€testified€that€he€didÐ î%>!% Ðnot€know€the€defendant.€€Further,€this€witness€testified€that€the€endorsement€on€the€back€of€the€checkÐ Ô&$"& Ðwas€not€his€and€that€he€never€gave€the€defendant€permission€to€sign€the€back€of€the€check.€€€€Ð º' #' ÐÌà  àAt€trial€the€defendant€testified€that€he€never€saw€the€check€before;€did€not€forge€the€signatureÐ †)Ö$) Ðon€the€back€of€the€check;€did€not€give€it€to€anyone€to€cash;€and€was€innocent€of€the€crimes€he€wasÐ l*¼%* Ðbeing€tried€for.€€The€jury€obviously€did€not€believe€the€defendantððs€testimony.€€This€was€the€juryððsÐ R+¢&+ Ðprerogative.Ð 8,ˆ', Їà  àWhile€the€evidence€presented€in€this€case€was€purely€circumstantial,€a€jury€could€haveÐ ° Ðconcluded€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€the€defendant€was€the€person€who€committed€theseÐ –æ Ðcrimes.€€This€court€will€not€disturb€the€juryððs€findings.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.€€Ð |Ì Ѐ€€€Ð b² ÐÌòòà@¡¡ ìàÔ  Ôò òCONSECUTIVE€SENTENCESóóó óˆÐ . ~ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€imposing€a€consecutive€sentence.€€WeÐ ú J Ðrespectfully€disagree.€Ð à 0 ÐÌò òÓ€ 5(jù88<Óó óòòÓ  ÓStandard€of€ReviewóóÔ :3ÔÐ ¬ ü  ÐÓ­4Óà  àÌÓÓÓÓà  àA€court€may€order€sentences€to€run€consecutively€if€the€court€finds€by€a€preponderance€ofÐ xÈ  Ðthe€evidence€that€ð ð[t]he€defendant€is€an€offender€whose€record€of€criminal€activity€is€extensive.ððÐ ^®  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b);òò€see€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Blackóó,€924€S.W.2d€912,€917€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð D”  Ð1995).€Ð *z  ÐÌÓ%5Óòòò òó óÓ  ÓAnalysisò òÐ öF ÐÓì6ÓÓÓà  àóóó óAn€examination€of€the€sentencing€record€indicates€that€the€trial€court€considered€severalÐ Â Ðenhancing€and€mitigating€factors€in€sentencing€the€defendant.€€One€of€the€enhancing€factors€the€trialÐ ¨ø Ðcourt€considered€was€the€fact€that€the€defendant€was€on€parole€at€the€time€he€committed€the€instantÐ ŽÞ Ðoffenses;€and€(2)€the€extensive€criminal€history€of€the€defendant.€€It€is€unclear€from€the€sentencingÐ tÄ Ðrecord,€however,€which€of€these€two€the€trial€court€used€as€its€basis€for€consecutive€sentences.Ð Zª ÐÌà  àAt€this€point€we€would€pause€to€reiterate€that€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(6)€states€thatÐ &v Ðconsecutive€sentences€may€be€imposed€ð ðfor€an€offense€committed€while€on€probation.ðð€€In€òòState€v.Ð  \ ÐPettusóó,€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€stated€that€ð ð[parole,]€probation€and€community€sentences€areÐ òB Ðalternatives€to€incarceration,€each€of€which€includes€suspension€of€incarceration.€€But€that€similarityÐ Ø( Ðalone€does€not€allow€courts€to€treat€the€alternatives€as€equivalents,€ignoring€thereby€the€natural€andÐ ¾ Ðordinary€meaning€of€the€language€used€in€the€statute.ðð€€òòState€v.€Pettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€540,€544€(Tenn.Ð ¤ô Ð1999).€€The€court€went€on€to€say€ð ðthe€legislature€did€not€intend€[for€these]€to€be€equivalents€forÐ Š Ú Ðpurposes€of€consecutive€sentencing€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(6).€€Thus,€the€trial€courtÐ p!À  Ðcould€not€have€used€the€fact€that€the€defendant€was€on€parole€when€he€committed€the€instant€offensesÐ V"¦! Ðto€impose€consecutive€sentences.€€Parole€and€probation€are€not€synonymous€for€purposes€of€Tenn.Ð <#Œ" ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(6).€Ð "$r# ÐÌà  àA€review€of€the€record€demonstrates€that€the€defendant€has€an€extensive€criminal€history.€Ð î%>!% ÐPast€convictions€of€the€defendant€include:€driving€with€a€revoked€license;€robbery€with€the€use€ofÐ Ô&$"& Ða€deadly€weapon;€aggravated€burglary;€and€aggravated€rape.€€Based€upon€this€extensive€criminalÐ º' #' Ðhistory€it€was€proper€for€the€trial€court€to€run€the€sentences€consecutively.€€€òòSeeòòóóóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann€ððÐ  (ð#( Ð40„35„115(b)(2).€€We€will€not€disturb€the€trial€courtððs€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences.€€ThisÐ †)Ö$) Ðmatter€is€without€merit.Ð l*¼%* ÐÌÐ 8,ˆ', Ðò òòòÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONóóó óÐ ° ÐÌÓ  Óà  àWe€conclude€that€there€was€sufficient€evidence€to€support€the€convictions€of€the€defendantÐ |Ì Ðand€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€imposing€consecutive€sentences.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€courtÐ b² Ðis€affirmed.€Ð H˜ ÐÓ†AÓÓ  Óà  àÌÓ(7ÓÌÓ¼BÓÓ  ÓÌÌÓÓà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à____________________________________Ð xÈ  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à€€€JOHN€EVERETT€WILLIAMS,€JUDGEÐ ^®  ÐÔ#†Xx¼XX@Xx¼‡ #ÔÓ CÓòòò òó óóóÓ€ )(ê½885Ó