ÿWPC8 òh¨•mf–Þ-Ã9ÒpMv0*§vkš|€Eß-ØchÀÇ–aÖ£–"c¤|æ+ä¼Û¢ÎoHX~…Ð_B^üCÒº)dù㯠Œ¾geÏfôkÖ'K¢Ó¸øÔè_Ü5þ&Ù•&KÎñÈüØh÷–‘Šô²‘bô>}½_ˆÿ¦p‚±ŒbðóbhõEîJ I0ßš{¶ Ã[e?˜Î<®Ë%·]j›íacÀÜ^¥~Ü5ÕÄ_ªýÀ9Ëà»bõ 7FÕoŒIË ,´É”Õ ©®T¦%ŒÏÄ—Y(‰ß…îŸU̪mªgv^óo;¯Ù€ Q+‡ÿñb”Nkw\ßÍH¦$ 4³‚ö§>ë¾5~{{6Am&O(IMˆB Jê'­AFͯÈqK·L×™IÕBhXÃɾÆ,­IÊx%©Ü@¹¿òíq[lÚÍÑÛu¬î ׋¬|*½ïÈ µQÙ>/ç²áÇ2Êi×|| b#É\ %% ^ + 0ˆ7 U N¿ w 4 z% ÒŸ q € m‚ UN™ Æç Æ­ ÆsÆ9 0DÿNCCCEEEE}GGTÄÄb------------------------------------ 0ë5555 B   0¤= D3á D- 0KAA ASŒÆß 0¤¥ 0DI A«˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»à1Þ (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularóbï.ê:i¢×+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó sÝ ƒRÊ+$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôýAò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔòòóóWe€note€that€the€order€dismissing€the€petition€was€filed€on€April€15,€2004,€but€the€Stateððs€motion€to€dismissÐ ° Ðwas€filed€on€May€27,€2004,€and€the€petitionerððs€response€to€that€motion€was€also€filed€on€May€27,€2004. BecknerHCMcLinTrantBerkleyu]nderT.C.A.LavelBloomeryPassarellaFredrickHickmana]lthoughMalengCorrection[sLauelBloomey Ý ƒRÊ+$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôýAò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔòòóóWeÔ‡»V‰»òôýAÔ€Ô#†ôýAò»»V‰†#Ôpresume€this€was€intended€to€be€Laurel€Bloomery€in€Johnson€County.- ù-(|G2Ê+$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€V‰»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôýAò»»Ô d(|3dž$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€V‰»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3dž$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€V‰»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€V‰»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼V‰»»»ÔÑ8€½XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îI¸î»¼V‰ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼V‰»îîI¸ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€October€27,€2004Ð üL ÐÔ‡X½X»¼V‰ÔÌò òÔ#†¼V‰»XX½!#ÔJAMES€WILLIAM€PARSONS,€JR.òòóó€v.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóóÔ‡X½X»¼V‰Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Greene€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€04CR066€€€€€€James€E.€Beckner,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2004„01347„CCA„R3„HC€„€Filed€December€29,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡ X½XXX½ÔThe€petitioner,€James€William€Parsons,€Jr.,€appeals€the€summary€dismissal€of€his€petition€for€writÐ xÈ  Ðof€habeas€corpus.€€In€1999,€he€pled€guilty€to€theft€of€property€over€$1000,€arson,€consuming€alcoholÐ d´ Ðwhile€under€the€age€of€twenty„one,€and€possession€of€a€weapon€in€the€commission€of€an€offense€andÐ P  Ðwas€sentenced€to€an€effective€sentence€of€two€years€and€one€day,€with€all€but€120€days€to€be€servedÐ <Œ Ðon€probation.€€He€was€subsequently€convicted€on€separate€charges€in€federal€court€and€sentenced€toÐ (x Ðthe€federal€penitentiary.€€The€petitioner€filed€a€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus€in€the€GreeneÐ d ÐCounty€Criminal€Court,€claiming€that€his€state€plea€agreement€was€illegal€and€void€and€therefore€itÐ P Ðwas€improper€for€the€federal€court€to€use€the€state€convictions€to€enhance€his€federal€sentence.€€TheÐ ì< Ðtrial€court€dismissed€the€petition€without€a€hearing€on€the€matter,€and€the€petitioner€appealed.€€BasedÐ Ø( Ðupon€our€review,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ô#†X½XX X½Ñ#ÔÔ#†¼V‰»XX½£#ÔÔ‡X½X»¼V‰ÔÐ Ä ÐÓÅÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ œì ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼V‰»àX½« #ÔÔ‡X½X.¼V‰ÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJerry€L.€Smithóó€and€òòJ.€C.€McLin,Ð tÄ ÐJJ.óó,€joined.Ð `° ÐÌDouglas€A.€Trant,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€James€William€Parsons,€Jr.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Renee€W.€Turner,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð #`" Ðand€C.€Berkley€Bell,€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ô#†¼V‰»XX½Œ #ÔÔ‡X½X»¼V‰Ô€Ð ü#L# ÐÓ] ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼V‰»XX½¤ #ÔÔ‡X½X»¼V‰ÔÐ Ô%$!% ÐÌò òòòÔ‡ X½XXX½ÔFACTSóóó óÐ ¬'ü"' ÐÌÓ  Óà  àFrom€the€sparse€record€in€this€case,€it€appears€than€on€October€15,€1999,€the€petitioner€pledÐ „)Ô$) Ðguilty€in€the€Criminal€Court€of€Greene€County€to€theft€of€property€over€$1000,€arson,€consumptionÐ p*À%* Ðof€alcohol€while€under€twenty„one€years€of€age,€and€possession€of€a€weapon€in€the€commission€ofÐ \+¬&+ Ðan€offense.€€He€was€sentenced€to€an€effective€sentence€of€two€years€and€a€day,€with€120€days€to€beÐ H,˜', Ðserved€in€incarceration€and€the€remainder€on€probation,€and€the€trial€court€entered€an€AlternativeÐ 4-„(-ý‘ ÐÔ_ÔSentencing€Order€placing€the€petitioner€in€the€community€corrections€program.€€The€petitioner€wasÐ ° Ðsubsequently€convicted€in€federal€court€on€unrelated€offenses,€and€the€state€convictions€in€the€presentÐ œì Ðappeal€were€utilized€to€enhance€his€federal€sentence.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àOn€April€5,€2004,€the€petitioner€filed€a€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus€in€the€CriminalÐ `° ÐCourt€of€Greene€County,€alleging€that€he€was€being€illegally€restrained€of€his€liberty€in€federal€prisonÐ L œ Ðin€West€Virginia€due€to€his€federal€sentence€being€enhanced€based€in€part€on€his€TennesseeÐ 8 ˆ Ðconvictions.€€He€claimed€the€state€sentence€was€illegal€and€void€because€the€trial€court€lackedÐ $ t Ðjurisdiction€under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„36„106€to€place€him€in€communityÐ  ` Ðcorrections,€as€his€underlying€convictions€included€the€possession€of€a€weapon€in€the€commissionÐ ü L  Ðof€an€offense€and€arson,€which€he€contended€was€a€ð ðcrime€of€violence.ðð€€The€petitioner€alleged€thatÐ è 8  Ðhe€was€ð ðunaware€that€the€agreed€sentence€to€which€he€was€pleading€was€illegal€and€could€not€haveÐ Ô$  Ðknowingly€and€voluntarily€plead€guiltyðð€and€ð ð[u]nder€such€circumstances,€a€defendant€is€entitled€toÐ À  Ðwithdraw€his€plea€and€proceed€with€trial.ððÐ ¬ü  ÐÌà  àOn€April€13,€2004,€the€trial€court€dismissed€the€petition€without€a€hearing,€finding€that€theÐ „Ô  Ðpetitioner€had€failed€to€allege€any€grounds€entitling€him€to€habeas€corpus€relief:Ð pÀ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€petitioner€is€in€Federal€custody€but€the€conviction€in€thisÐ H˜ Ðcourt€was€used€to€enhance€his€Federal€sentence.Ð4„` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€petitioner€was€placed€in€Community€Correction[s]€afterÐ  p Ðconviction€for€arson.€€Petitioner€argues€that€the€sentence€(not€theÐ  \ Ðconviction)€was€illegal€and€void€because€this€court€did€not€haveÐ øH Ðjurisdiction€to€sentence€the€petitioner€to€Community€Corrections€uponÐ ä4 Ða€conviction€for€Arson.€€The€petitioner€alleges€that€arson€is€a€crime€ofÐ Ð  Ðviolence.м ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àT.C.A.€40„36„106€makes€persons€ineligible€for€CommunityÐ ¨ø ÐCorrections€who€have€been€convicted€of€a€crime€of€violence€to€theÐ ”ä Ðperson.ЀÐ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àArson€is€not€a€crime€of€violence€to€the€person.€€AggravatedÐ l¼ ÐArson€can€be€a€crime€of€violence€to€the€person€but€the€petitioner€wasÐ X ¨ Ðnot€convicted€of€Aggravated€Arson.ÐD!”` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àFurther,€even€though€the€statute€makes€a€defendant€ineligibleÐ 0"€  Ðfor€sentencing€to€community€corrections€the€sentencing€court€hasÐ #l! Ðjurisdiction€to€impose€such€a€sentence.€€Ð$X"` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àIn€addition€a€writ€of€habeas€corpus€must€be€filed€in€theÐ ô$D # Ðjurisdiction€in€which€the€petitioner€is€incarcerated€and€this€county€isÐ à%0!$ Ðnot€that€jurisdiction.ÐÌ&"%` x` x ÐÌò òòòÓ  ÓANALYSISÐ ¤(ô#' Ðóóó óÓÀÓÌà  àWe€begin€our€analysis€by€agreeing€with€the€State€that€this€appeal€appears€to€be€time„barred.€Ð |*Ì%) ÐPursuant€to€Tennessee€Rule€of€Appellate€Procedure€4(a),€a€notice€of€appeal€must€be€filed€withinÐ h+¸&* Ðthirty€days€of€the€judgment€from€which€the€appeal€is€taken.€€Although€the€order€dismissing€theÐ ° Ðpetition€was€filed€on€April€15,€2004,€the€notice€of€appeal€was€not€filed€until€June€2,€2004,€and€doesÐ œì Ðnot€explain€why€it€was€filed€outside€the€thirty€days€for€appeal.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€One€possibility€is€that€the€certificateÐ ˆØ Ðof€clerk€on€the€order,€dated€April€15,€2004,€reflects€that€it€was€mailed€to€the€petitioner€at€a€routeÐ tÄ Ðnumber€in€ð ðLauel€Bloomey,ðð€Tennessee,׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€but€it€does€not€reflect€that€a€copy€was€sent€to€theÐ `° Ðpetitionerððs€counsel.€€At€the€time€of€the€dismissal,€it€appears€that€the€petitioner€was€incarcerated€inÐ L œ Ða€federal€prison€in€West€Virginia.€€This€court€may€waive€untimely€filing€of€the€notice€of€appeal€ð ðinÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€interest€of€justice.ðð€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€4(a).€€Because€it€does€not€appear€that€the€notice€of€theÐ $ t Ðdismissal€of€the€petition€timely€reached€the€petitioner€or€his€counsel,€we€will€address€the€merits€ofÐ  ` Ðthis€appeal.Ð ü L  ÐÌ€à  àIt€is€well€established€in€Tennessee€that€the€remedy€provided€by€a€writ€of€habeas€corpus€isÐ Ô$  Ðlimited€in€scope€and€may€only€be€invoked€where€the€judgment€is€void€or€the€petitioner's€term€ofÐ À  Ðimprisonment€has€expired.€€òòState€v.€Davenportóó,€980€S.W.2d€407,€409€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998);Ð ¬ü  ÐòòPassarella€v.€Stateóó,€891€S.W.2d€619,€626€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994)òòóó.€€A€void,€as€opposed€to€aÐ ˜è  Ðvoidable,€judgment€has€been€defined€by€our€supreme€court€as€"one€in€which€the€judgment€is€faciallyÐ „Ô  Ðinvalid€because€the€court€did€not€have€the€statutory€authority€to€render€such€judgment."€€òòDykes€v.Ð pÀ ÐComptonóó,€978€S.W.2d€528,€529€(Tenn.€1998);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòTaylor€v.€Stateóó,€995€S.W.2d€78,€83€(Tenn.Ð \¬ Ð1999).€€The€judgment€of€a€court€of€general€jurisdiction€is€conclusive€and€presumed€to€be€valid,€andÐ H˜ Ðsuch€a€judgment€can€only€be€impeached€if€the€record€affirmatively€shows€that€the€rendering€courtÐ 4„ Ðwas€without€personal€or€subject€matter€jurisdiction.€€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2d€157,€162€(Tenn.Ð  p Ð1993);€òòPassarellaóó,€891€S.W.2d€at€626.€€Thus,€habeas€corpus€relief€is€available€only€when€"'it€appearsÐ  \ Ðupon€the€face€of€the€judgment€or€the€record€of€the€proceedings€upon€which€the€judgement€isÐ øH Ðrendered'€that€a€convicting€court€was€without€jurisdiction€or€authority€to€sentence€a€defendant,€or€thatÐ ä4 Ða€defendant's€sentence€of€imprisonment€.€.€.€has€expired."€€òòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€at€164€(citationÐ Ð  Ðomitted).Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àTo€obtain€habeas€corpus€relief,€the€petitioner€must€show€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidenceÐ ”ä Ðthat€his€sentence€is€void€and€not€merely€voidable.€€òòSeeóó€òòDavenportóó,€980€S.W.2d€at€409;€òòPassarellaóó,Ð €Ð Ð891€S.W.2d€at€627.€€Consequently,€a€petitioner€cannot€collaterally€attack€a€facially€valid€judgmentÐ l¼ Ðof€the€trial€court€in€a€petition€for€habeas€corpus€relief.€€òòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€at€162.€€The€properÐ X ¨ Ðmeans€of€challenging€a€facially€valid€judgment€based€on€a€constitutional€violation€is€through€aÐ D!” Ðpetition€for€post-conviction€relief.€€òòLewis€v.€Metropolitan€Gen.€Sessions€Court€for€Nashvilleóó,€949Ð 0"€  ÐS.W.2d€696,€699€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996)òòóó;€òòFredrick€v.€Stateóó,€906€S.W.2d€927,€929€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð #l! ÐApp.€1993).Ð $X" ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner€pled€guilty€to€theft€of€property€over€$1000,€a€Class€D€felony,€and€wasÐ à%0!$ Ðsentenced€as€a€Range€I,€standard€offender€to€two€years€and€a€day€in€the€county€jail.€€The€judgmentÐ Ì&"% Ðform€for€the€theft€shows€that€he€was€to€be€incarcerated€for€120€days,€with€the€remainder€to€be€servedÐ ° Ðon€probation.€€The€sentences€for€his€arson,€consuming€alcohol€under€the€age€of€twenty„one,€andÐ œì Ðpossession€of€a€weapon€in€the€commission€of€an€offense€convictions€were€one€year,€eleven€monthsÐ ˆØ Ðand€twenty„nine€days,€and€one€year,€respectively,€to€be€served€concurrently€with€the€theft€sentence.€Ð tÄ ÐThere€is€nothing€on€the€face€of€the€judgments,€and€the€petitioner€does€not€so€allege,€showing€that€theÐ `° Ðjudgments€were€invalid€or€void.Ð L œ ÐÌà  àNeither€is€the€petitioner's€sentence€illegal.€€Community€corrections€is€an€alternativeÐ $ t Ðsentencing€and€punishment€scheme€for€selected,€nonviolent€offenders,€allowing€the€state€to€reserveÐ  ` Ðð ðsecure€confinement€facilities€for€violent€felony€offenders.ðð€€Tenn.€Code.€Ann.€ðð€40„36„103(1)Ð ü L  Ð(2003).€€The€petitioner€contends€that€because€he€did€not€meet€the€statutory€eligibility€requirementsÐ è 8  Ðof€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„36„106(a)(1)(C)€and€(D),€the€trial€court€did€not€have€theÐ Ô$  Ðauthority€to€sentence€him€to€community€corrections,€and€therefore,€his€sentence€was€illegal.Ð À  ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€forms€do€not€reflect€that€the€petitioner€was€placed€in€the€communityÐ ˜è  Ðcorrections€program,€but€the€trial€court€entered€an€Alternative€Sentencing€Order€on€October€15,Ð „Ô  Ð1999,€the€same€day€the€judgments€were€entered,€placing€the€petitioner€in€the€community€correctionsÐ pÀ Ðprogram.€€However,€the€order€was€not€filed€until€April€3,€2000.€€As€for€whether€the€petitionerððsÐ \¬ Ðsentence€disqualified€him€from€the€community€corrections€program,€as€he€claims,€we€note€that€heÐ H˜ Ðpled€guilty€to€arson,€as€set€forth€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„14„303€(1997),€which€isÐ 4„ Ðstyled€ð ðSetting€fire€to€personal€property€or€landðð€and€exempts€buildings€or€structures€which€areÐ  p Ðcovered€under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„14„301.€€The€record€contains€no€factsÐ  \ Ðconcerning€the€underlying€convictions,€and€we€cannot€conclude€that€the€arson€in€this€case€was€otherÐ øH Ðthan€a€property„related€crime.€€Such€a€conviction€would€not€make€the€petitioner€ineligible€forÐ ä4 Ðcommunity€corrections.€€He€also€pled€guilty€to€possession€of€a€weapon€in€the€commission€of€anÐ Ð  Ðoffense€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„17„1307€(1997),€which€could€have€madeÐ ¼  Ðhim€ineligible€for€community€corrections€under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„36„Ð ¨ø Ð106(a)(1)(D)€(2003).€€However,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„36„106(c)€allows€a€trial€courtÐ ”ä Ðto€sentence€an€otherwise€ineligible€felony€offender€to€community€corrections€if€that€offender€has€aÐ €Ð Ðhistory€of€chronic€alcohol€or€drug€abuse,€or€mental€health€problems,€and€the€problems€can€be€treatedÐ l¼ Ðin€the€community€setting.€€Because€of€the€incompleteness€of€the€record,€we€cannot€conclude€that€theÐ X ¨ Ðtrial€court€did€not€utilize€this€provision€in€sentencing€the€petitioner€to€community€corrections.€€Thus,Ð D!” Ðthe€record€on€appeal€does€not€support€the€petitionerððs€claim€that€the€nature€of€his€sentencesÐ 0"€  Ðdisqualified€him€from€community€corrections.ûÿÿdûÐ #l! ÐüÿÿdüÌà  àFinally,€we€note€that€in€the€very€recent€decision€of€òòHickman€v.€Stateóó,€__S.W.3d__,€2004€WLÐ ô$D # Ð2563267€(Tenn.€2004),€our€supreme€court€held€the€writ€of€habeas€corpus€cannot€be€used€to€attackÐ à%0!$ Ða€conviction€when€that€conviction€is€only€used€to€enhance€a€subsequent€conviction.€€The€facts€ofÐ Ì&"% ÐòòHickmanóó€are€similar€to€the€present€case.€€In€òòHickmanóó,€the€petitioner€pled€guilty€in€1986€to€aÐ ¸'#& Ðmarijuana€possession€charge.€€Sixteen€years€later,€in€2002,€the€petitioner€ð ðsought€to€set€aside€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ð1986€conviction€ððso€[that]€it€may€not€be€considered€in€a€case€in€U.S.€District€Court.ðððð€€òòId.óó€at€*1.€€TheÐ )à$( ÐTennessee€Supreme€Court€affirmed€the€dismissal€of€that€petition,€holding€that€ð ð[a]lthough€this€1986Ð |*Ì%) Ðconviction€may€have€been€used€to€enhance€a€federal€sentence€Hickman€is€serving,€enhancement€isÐ h+¸&* Ðmerely€a€collateral€consequence€of€the€1986€judgment,ðð€and€thus,€ð ðhabeas€corpus€is€not€anÐ ° Ðappropriate€avenue€for€seeking€relief.ðð€€òòId.óó€at€**4„5€(citing€òòMaleng€v.€Cookóó,€490€U.S.€488,€109€S.Ð œì ÐCt.€1923€(1989)).€€While€the€petitioner€here€might€be€ð ðin€custodyðð€under€the€Post„ConvictionÐ ˆØ ÐProcedure€Act€and€may€be€suffering€ð ðcollateral€legal€consequences,ðð€òòseeóó€òòPassarellaóó,€891€S.W.2d€atÐ tÄ Ð623,€he€is€not€ð ðimprisonedðð€or€ð ðrestrained€of€libertyðð€on€the€convictions€he€now€challenges€underÐ `° Ðthe€state€habeas€corpus€act.€€The€record€reflects€that€the€challenged€sentences€expired€in€2001,€andÐ L œ Ðthe€petitioner€is€therefore€no€longer€imprisoned€or€restrained€of€his€liberty€on€those€convictions.€€TheÐ 8 ˆ Ðenhancement€of€the€petitionerððs€federal€sentence€would€appear€to€be€merely€a€collateral€consequenceÐ $ t Ðof€his€state€convictions.€ð ðUse€of€the€challenged€judgment€to€enhance€the€sentence€imposed€on€aÐ  ` Ðseparate€conviction€is€not€a€restraint€of€liberty€sufficient€to€permit€a€habeas€corpus€challenge€to€theÐ ü L  Ðoriginal€conviction€long€after€the€sentence€on€the€original€conviction€has€expired.ðð€€òòHickmanóó,€2004Ð è 8  ÐWL€2563267,€at€*5.à ¸ àÐ Ô$  Ðà  àÌà  àUnder€certain€circumstances,€a€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus€may€be€treated€as€a€petitionÐ ¬ü  Ðfor€post-conviction€relief€under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40-30-205(c);€however,€theÐ ˜è  Ðstatute€of€limitations€for€filing€a€post„conviction€petition€is€one€year€from€the€date€of€the€final€actionÐ „Ô  Ðof€the€highest€state€appellate€court€to€which€an€appeal€is€taken€or€within€one€year€of€the€date€onÐ pÀ Ðwhich€the€judgment€became€final.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„102(a)€(2003).€€Here,€the€guilty€pleasÐ \¬ Ðwere€entered€in€1999,€but€the€habeas€corpus€petition€was€not€filed€until€2004.€€Therefore,€even€if€weÐ H˜ Ðwere€to€treat€the€petition€as€one€for€post„conviction€relief,€it€would€be€barred€by€the€expiration€of€theÐ 4„ Ðstatute€of€limitations.€€òòCarter€v.€Stateóó,€952€S.W.2d€417,€420€(Tenn.€1997).Ð  p ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner€does€not€allege€that€the€trial€court€lacked€personal€and€subject€matterÐ øH Ðjurisdiction€over€him€when€it€rendered€the€judgment.€€This€judgment€is€presumed€to€be€valid,€andÐ ä4 Ðwe€see€no€evidence€in€the€record€before€us€that€it€was€not.€€A€facially€valid€judgment€cannot€beÐ Ð  Ðcollaterally€attacked€by€requesting€habeas€corpus€relief,€and€the€trial€court€was€correct€in€dismissingÐ ¼  Ðthe€petition.€€We,€therefore,€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð ¨ø ÐÌÓ  Óò òòòCONCLUSIONóóÐ €Ð ÐÌÓ  Óà  àó óBased€on€the€foregoing€authorities€and€reasoning,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€courtÐ X ¨ Ðdismissing€the€petition.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à_______________________________Ð #l! Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGEÐ $X" ÐÌÔ#†X½XX X½g #ÔÔ#†¼V‰»XX½, #ÔÔ‡X½X»¼V‰ÔÌòòóóÔ#†¼V‰»XX½QO#ÔÔ€X½X»¼V‰ÔÌ