WPC N7!v^oƥ^qw۾AsUr n+x}HCg=}MHy҂LFuU 9v:t'TÄ0?eiM8LzEt:d'̘”*E]@%֭Sr /HnY(`0)L C Y8"/s 4e> k5$T4ѱUHx~ȼ,`*n,V\`rU_Lֆߗn8pOd( 9<sSZ)nZ;*jdVLz}ǻx n/h0}s”jBp^>x'2(?Dg)nK OxfDwF`Wg."aJ$A jhQ/猊!-`s@`u)SKA@G POb %\^ b 0nU NwD4H\ zk m UN #   k 1NJ 0DEY[fcaeByyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyb 0 B 0 D3o D- 0K ASm 03 0D A(o-s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular3j1,bk23|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularHP LaserJet 40500Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  R^$      2     _Althoughwerecognizethatasentenceofelevenmonthsandtwentyninedaysisanauthorizedpunishment e foraRangeIstandardoffenderforaClassEfelony,seeTenn.CodeAnn.4035211(2),therecordrevealsthatthe ) partiesdidnotcontemplatefelonysentencing.Furthermore,themandatoryminimumfineforfourthoffenseDUIis  $3,000.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.5510403(a)(1).Thetrialcourtimposedafineof$1,100,themandatoryminimumfine L forthirdoffenseDUI.Id. @ R^$      1     _Thisjudgmentissilentastoconcurrent/consecutivesentencing;however,therecordclearlyindicatesthetrial e courtintendedtorunthissentenceconsecutivelytoC12957.(#$  0    TABLE A 8 R^$      3     _WenotethattherecordindicatesthedefendantwasonbailfortheJuly15,2000,chargewhenheallegedly e committedtheremainingoffenses.Therefore,asentencefora felony ,suchasDUIfourthoffense,committedwhilehe ) wasonbail must beservedconsecutivelytoanysentenceimposedfortheprioroffense.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4020  111(b);Tenn.R.Crim.P.32(c)(3)(C).Ifadefendantissentencedfora misdemeanor committedwhileonbail,itis P withinthetrialcourts discretion toorderconcurrentsentencing.Seeid.Thisiscontrarytotheunderstandingofthe { partiesasreflectedbytheirstatementsatthepleaandsentencinghearings.Wenotethisforguidancetothepartiesand A thetrialcourtuponremand.   Ѐ- -(|G2^$ !.8=dd8         0   d(|3g$ !.8=dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3g$ !.8=dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _  8ZAXXdd8  @ttlINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#l #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsOctober29,2002 L XZAX #XXZA #STATEOFTENNESSEEv.SAMUELLEE_PARTIN_XZAX  J  Direct @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Blount_ԀCounty  J @@Nos.C12957,C1350613509#XXZA#XZAXԀD.KellyThomas,Jr.,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200200094CCAR3CD   November15,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Thedefendantpledguiltytotwocountsofdrivingafterbeingdeclaredanhabitualmotorvehicle x  offenderandonecounteachof thirdorsubsequentoffense_DUI_,childendangerment,and d vehicularassault,anditwasagreedthetrialcourtwoulddeterminethesentences.Thetrialcourt P imposedatotaleffectivesentenceoffiveyears,elevenmonths,andtwentyeightdaysin < incarceration.Inthisappeal,thedefendantarguesthetrialcourterredinsentencinghim.We (x concludethedefendantwasindictedforfourthoffense_DUI_,aClassEfelony;hepledguiltytothe d offenseaschargedintheindictment,yetthepleaerroneouslyreferredtothenonexistent P enhancementclassificationof thirdorsubsequentoffense_DUI_Ԁratherthanfourthoffense_DUI_;and < thedefendantwaserroneouslysentencedforamisdemeanorbaseduponthisnonexistent ( enhancementclassification.Becausethedefendantsguiltypleaandsentenceforthisoffensewere  erroneousandhispleastoallotheroffenseswerepartofhisagreementtopleadguilty,wevacate  alljudgmentsofconvictionandremandtothetrialcourtforfurtherproceedings.  Ѐ Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentsoftheCircuitCourtVacated;Remanded t Ѐ  ` #XZA#XZAX.JoeG.Riley,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichGaryR.Wade,_P.J._,andRobertW. L  _Wedemeyer_,J.,joined. 8!  JulieA.Rice,Knoxville,Tennessee(onappeal);RaymondMackGarner,DistrictPublicDefender; #`" andShawnG.Graham,AssistantDistrictPublicDefender(atsentencinghearing),fortheappellant, #L# SamuelLee_Partin_. $8 $ PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;ReneeW.Turner,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; &"& MichaelL.Flynn,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andJohnAndersonBobo,Jr.,AssistantDistrict '"' AttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. (#(  4-(- _ @66'OPINION e   OnJuly15,2000,thedefendantwasarrestedfordrivingafterbeingdeclaredanhabitual = motorvehicleoffender.OnFebruary16,2001,whilehewasonbondforthefirstoffense,the ) defendantwasinvolvedasadriverinamotorvehicleaccidentandwaschargedwithdrivingafter  beingdeclaredanhabitualmotorvehicleoffender;DUI,fourthoffense;#XXZA #XZAXchildendangerment;and   vehicularassault.OnDecember3,2001,hepledguiltytoallchargesandagreedtosubmitto   sentencingbythetrialcourt.  t   Thetrialcourtsentencedthedefendanttothefollowing:  L   XZAXXXZAe*Vddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,dd ,edd ,dd ,dd ,dd +  $ $  Case   Number  t  Offense   Date  t  Offense    Offense   Classification t  Accordingto `  theJudgment  L  Sentence    C12957 8. 1  @36721 @87/15/00 7-+1  @36721  @ 7MotorVehicle 1 HabitualOffender  Violation    ClassEFelony  1 2years,consecutiveto 1 C13508   C13506 8. $  @36937 @82/16/01 7-+$  @36937  @ 7DUI  $  ClassA $! Misdemeanor  u" 11months,29days, $# consecutivetoC12957 #  1       u$ C13507 8. %  @36937 @82/16/01 7-+&  @36937  @ 7Child ' Endangerment  |( ClassA ) Misdemeanor  |* 11months,29days, + consecutivetoC13506  |, C13508 8. a-  @36937 @82/16/01 7-+a.  @36937  @ 7VehicularAssault  a/ ClassD a0 Felony  M1 2years,consecutiveto a2 C13506  M3 C13509 8. h4  @36937 @82/16/01 7-+h5  @36937  @ 7MotorVehicle h6 HabitualOffender T7 Violation  @8 ClassEFelony  h9 2years,concurrentwith h: C13508 T;  #XZAXX XZA##XXZA#XZAX XZAXXXZA#XZAXX XZAd##XXZAE#XZAX  Further,thetrialcourtorderedallsentencestobeservedinincarceration.Inthisappeal,the !H< defendantargueshewasimproperlysentenced.Specifically,hecontendsthetrialcourtimproperly "4= imposedconsecutivesentencesanderredbynotgrantingalternativesentencing.However, # > followingathoroughreviewoftherecord,weareforcedtoconcludethedefendantsguiltypleaand q$ ? sentenceontheDUIindictmentwereerroneous.DefendantreceivedaClassAmisdemeanor ]% @ sentence,whereashisguiltypleawastofourthoffenseDUIwhichisaClassEfelony.Forthis I&!A reason,weareunabletoreachthemeritsoftheissuesraisedinthisappealandmustremandthe 5'"B mattertothetrialcourt. !(#C   )$D @& ANALYSIS  e     TheindictmentincasenumberC13506allegedthedefendantcommittedDUI,fourth = offense.ThatindictmentspecificallyallegedthedefendanthadthreepriorDUIconvictions,which ) itlisted.Thedocumentcommemoratingthepleaagreement,entitled RequestforAcceptanceof  PleasofGuilty[and]PetitiontoWaiveTrialbyJuryandtoWaiveanAppeal,whichwassigned   bythedefendant,hiscounsel,theassistantdistrictattorney,andacceptedbythetrialcourt,stated   thedefendantwaschargedwithandwaspleadingguiltyto DUI3rdorSubsequentoffensewitha  t maximumsentenceofelevenmonthsandtwentyninedays.Atthepleahearing,defensecounsel  ` misstatedthedefendantwaschargedwith DUIthirdorsubsequentoffense,asopposedtofourth  L  offenseDUI.Thereisnoindicationthedefendantwaspleadingtothereducedchargeofthird  8  offenseDUI;instead,therecordindicatesthedefendantwaspleadingguiltytothechargesasset $  forthintheindictment. u    Atthesentencinghearing,thethreepriorDUIconvictionslistedintheindictmentwere M  establishedbytheevidence,andthetrialcourtnotedthesepriorconvictionsinsentencingthe 9  defendant.However,thejudgmentofconvictionenteredincasenumberC13506incorrectlyshows % thedefendantwasoriginallychargedwithClassAmisdemeanorDUI;itdoesnotaccuratelyreflect  thattheoriginalchargewasfourthoffenseDUI,aClassEfelony.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.5510  403(a)(1).Likewise,thejudgmentsimplystatesthedefendantwasconvictedofmisdemeanorDUI  andindicatesmisdemeanorpunishmentwasimposed.Thefineimposedwas$1,100,whichisthe p minimumfineforthirdoffenseDUI;theminimumfineforfourthoffenseDUIis$3,000.Seeid. \   A fourthorsubsequentconvictionforDUIisaClassEfelonywithamandatoryminimum 4 sentenceof150daysincarcerationandwithmaximumpunishmentaccordingtotheappropriate   rangeforaClassEfelony.Tenn.CodeAnn.5510403(a)(1).Therecordindicatesthedefendant q  wasaRangeIstandardoffender;therefore,onaClassEfelony,hefacedamaximumpunishment ] oftwoyears.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035112(a)(5). I   WeconcludethedefendantpledguiltytothenonexistentDUIenhancementof thirdor ! subsequentoffense.Becausethereisnoindicationthedefendantwaspleadingguiltytoonlythird   offenseDUIasopposedtofourthoffenseDUI,themisdemeanorclassificationiserroneous. #  2      ׀When   theconsiderationforaguiltypleaisanillegalsentence,theguiltypleaisinvalidandthedefendant !  isentitledtoanopportunitytowithdrawhisplea.McConnellv.State,12S.W.3d795,800(Tenn. "l! 2000).Inthecaseatbar,thedefendantsguiltypleastoallofthechargesweresimultaneous.There #X"  isnoindicationwhetherornothewouldhavepledguiltytoalloftheindictmentshadheknownhe $D # waspleadingguiltytofelonyDUI. #  3      ׀Therefore,wevacateallofhisjudgmentsofconvictionand e  remandthismattertothetrialcourttoallowthedefendanttheopportunitytowithdrawhispleasand Q forfurtherproceedings. =    `     h     򀀀#XXZA#      `     h     XZAXJOEG.RILEY,JUDGE#XXZA1#