ÿWPCN Í—ì”Mé5=¨™7Ê_²]ð›‡XFÿbe&ÄFk`üé I3¶ä°ŒæahÉPq…X,Pz£ý\L ?×½Ã⃠¶šÌŒK0ý‚òáÝV‚^$‚ûïS¹s“ªÞU´Ïª%$ü†f>@Ó%b (`ЂЙÓh£<Ç·~· X—9UÀ·½BÜs™'ڛ݂¤¥ .JO›Îúë­l½‹”x¤áú• ™Ø¦WÒæƒÛ¨®÷£cœ!èú›nèî÷  1TtëKÞðkkì˜Ë¾üJbú©T»ÀL´J,ÉãC7‰’³ËŒW³†éÕö—ggV;®)'¢BA ¶ÍÆ[ ëׂš›êƒHû-Gh­§ó8ᓘš`‚…3eÞ  šœ©œÑÈ8Ù? ©|­(¹‡)º²{m”{2®Õl4­WsåðÞ\ÈÌŽ³Öwå,xç°(@ŽyèÀÉ=>ç.‹øþ’.ãÈ–s1ö>õlJjIF§|:¸A9¯ö¿REyî̶œÂ°5[d"&R:¿óœj—à*èwö~ÓwfœÃšWìOKzño•.#רû£È§èâ§«F7|Õ6¿µZrø+4Ú0ÉÂÍýü§b#Á\ % U N# 0ˆq UNù ^ G wS zW ÒÑ 4£ · Æ mÈ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1÷NÿÿU@EAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAbCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 0ëKKKK B66 0¤S D3÷ D-* 0KWW AS¢Æõ 0¤» 0D_ A«£˜HP LaserJet 8000 Series PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0»(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularõm+â  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptHEô*D¯3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 (ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman - ù-(|G2W™$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€^T»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô+8ò»»Ô d(|3$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€^T»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€^T»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C¼»»d dÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ€»|i»»»ÔÔ‡»|i»»»|iÔÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼|i»»»|iÔÑ8€+œXXdê»»d 8ÑÑ  Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îò|iÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼|i»îîòJ#ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€March€20,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡Xµ X»¼|iÔÌò òÔ#†¼|i»XXµ E#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€GLENN€RUSSELL€PARVINòòóóÔ‡Xµ X»¼|iÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Sullivan€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€S42853,€S42893,€S43039€€€€€€R.€Jerry€Beck,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2000„01756„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐAugust€29,€2001Ð ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÌà  àThe€Sullivan€County€grand€jury€issued€presentments€against€the€defendant€on€one€count€ofÐ d´ Ðoperating€a€motor€vehicle€without€a€face€shield;€two€counts€of€speeding;€three€counts€of€drivingÐ P  Ðunder€the€influence;€three€counts€of€driving€on€a€revoked€license;€two€counts€of€driving€on€revokedÐ <Œ Ðlicense€after€second€or€subsequent€conviction€for€driving€while€intoxicated;€one€count€of€€driving€onÐ (x Ðrevoked€license€after€second€or€subsequent€conviction€for€driving€under€the€influence;€one€count€ofÐ d Ðdriving€while€intoxicated,€fourth€offense;€and€one€count€of€driving€under€the€influence,€fourthÐ P Ðoffense.€ò òó óThe€charges€resulted€from€three€separate€cases.ò òó ó€€The€defendant€pled€to€all€of€the€crimes€inÐ ì< Ðtwo€different€plea€hearingsò òòòóóó ó€and€the€defendant€was€sentenced€as€a€career€offender€to€a€total€ofÐ Ø( Ðeighteen€years,€with€a€minimum€jail€time€of€585€days,€and€with€his€last€six€years€to€be€served€onÐ Ä Ðprobation.€ò òó óThe€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€as€a€career€offender€and€did€not€apprise€theÐ ° Ðdefendant€of€the€possibility€that€he€could€be€sentenced€as€a€persistent€offender,€as€opposed€to€a€careerÐ œì Ðoffender.ò òó ó€€He€moved€to€withdraw€his€guilty€pleas€on€this€ground.ò òó ó€€The€trial€court€denied€his€motion,Ð ˆØ Ðand€he€appeals€the€denial.ò òó ó€€€Furthermore,€the€defendant€waived€his€right€to€request€probation€orÐ tÄ Ðalternative€sentencing€in€one€caseò òó ó,€and€the€state€agreed€to€allow€the€defendant€to€serve€probation€inÐ `° Ðone€case.€ò ò€€ó óIn€the€third€case,€the€defendant€requested€probation€or€alternative€sentencing.€€The€trialÐ L œ Ðcourt€denied€his€request,€citing€his€extensive€criminal€history€in€support€of€its€denial.€€The€defendantÐ $Ž" Ðhad€stipulated.€ò òó ó€These€stipulations€included€the€facts€of€the€crimes€to€which€the€defendant€wasÐ .%~ # Ðpleading€guilty,€as€well€as€the€defendantððs€previous€six€felony€convictions€and€his€status€as€a€careerÐ &j!$ Ðoffender.ò ò€€ó óAfter€the€prosecutor€read€these€stipulations€onto€the€record,€the€trial€court€explained€to€theÐ 'V"% Ðdefendant€that€because€he€would€be€sentenced€as€a€career€offender€if€he€pled€guilty,€he€was€waivingÐ ö'F#& Ðhis€right€to€require€the€prosecution€to€prove€all€of€the€felonies€underlying€his€classification€as€a€careerÐ â(2$' Ðoffender.€ò ò€ó óÐ Î)%( Ðà  àAfter€ensuring€that€the€defendantððs€pleas€were€voluntary€and€not€the€products€of€coercion€€ò òó óÐ ¾*&) Ðthe€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€for€Case€S42,893,€in€which€the€defendant€had€previouslyÐ ª+ú&* Ðentered€an€open€plea€of€guilt,€as€well€as€Cases€S42,853€and€S43,039.€ò òó óThe€court€sentenced€theÐ ° Ðdefendant€as€a€career€offender€to€a€total€of€eighteen€years,€six€years€per€case€to€be€servedÐ œì Ðconsecutively,€with€a€mandatory€585€days€to€be€served€in€jail.€ò ò€ó óThe€defendant€waived€his€right€toÐ ˆØ Ðrequest€probation€or€alternative€sentencing€for€case€S42,859€in€his€plea€agreement€with€the€state.€ò òó óÐ xÈ ÐHowever,€he€did€not€waive€his€right€to€request€probation€or€alternative€sentencing€in€Case€S42,853,Ð d´ Ðand€the€court€agreed€to€hear€this€issue€at€a€later€date.€ò òó ó€€With€regard€to€case€S43,039,€the€state€agreedÐ P   Ðthat€the€defendant€could€serve€his€six„year€sentence€for€this€case€on€probation€after€serving€hisÐ < Œ Ðsentences€for€the€first€two€cases,€S42,893€and€S42,853.ò òó óÐ ( x Ðà  àThereafter,€the€defendant€filed€a€motion€to€withdraw€his€guilty€pleas,€and€the€court€held€aÐ  d Ðhearing€on€the€defendantððs€motion€on€April€25,€2000.ò òó ó€€At€this€hearing,€the€defendant€argued€that€theÐ  P  ÐState€could€not€use€his€pre„1989€felony€convictions€to€enhance€his€sentence,€as€those€convictionsÐ ì <  Ðoccurred€before€the€enactment€of€the€Tennessee€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act.ò òó ó€€Furthermore,€theÐ Ø(  Ðdefendant€argued€that€he€should€be€allowed€to€withdraw€his€guilty€plea€because€he€was€not€advisedÐ Ä  Ðof€the€fact€that€the€trial€court€or€a€jury€would€have€the€discretion€to€sentence€him€as€a€Range€IIIÐ °  Ðpersistent€offender,€as€opposed€to€a€Range€IV€career€offender.€ò ò€ó óThe€defendant€based€his€argumentÐ œì  Ðon€the€language€of€the€statute,€which€reads€that€an€individual€previously€convicted€of€five€or€moreÐ ŒÜ  Ðfelonies€may€be€classified€as€a€persistent€offender.ò òó ó€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„10(a)(1)€(1997).€Ð xÈ Ðà  àThe€defendant€argued€that€the€trial€court€should€apply€the€standard€of€review€set€forth€inÐ d´ ÐTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(f)€that€applies€when€the€defendant€has€pled€guilty€but€has€not€yet€beenÐ P  Ðsentenced,€òòi.e.óó€whether€there€is€a€ð ðfair€and€just€reasonðð€to€withdraw€the€guilty€plea.ò òó ó€The€defendantÐ <Œ Ðargued€that€the€stricter€standard€of€review,€òòi.e.,óó€to€correct€manifest€injustice,€which€is€applied€whenÐ (x Ða€defendant€has€pled€guilty€and€been€sentenced,€should€not€apply,€because€the€defendant€pled€guiltyÐ d Ðand€was€sentenced€almost€simultaneously,€thus€not€allowing€the€defendant€an€opportunity€toÐ P Ðchallenge€his€plea€before€being€sentenced.€ò ò€ó óThe€court€denied€the€defendantððs€motion,€stating€that€theÐ ì< Ðmotion€failed€under€both€of€the€standards€set€forth€under€Rule€32(f).ò òó óÐ Ü, Ðà  àSubsequently,€a€hearing€was€held€on€June€17,€2000€to€decide€the€unresolved€issue€of€whetherÐ È Ðthe€court€would€allow€the€defendant€to€receive€probation€or€alternative€sentencing€in€lieu€of€jail€timeÐ ´ Ðfor€case€S42,853.ò òó ó€€The€defendant€argued€that€he€should€be€placed€on€probation€or€in€a€communityÐ  ð Ðcorrections€program€because€his€crimes€were€a€result€of€his€untreated€alcoholism€and€because€hisÐ ŒÜ Ðconduct€neither€threatened€nor€caused€serious€bodily€injury.ò òó ó€€€The€court€denied€the€defendantððsÐ xÈ Ðrequest€based€upon€the€defendantððs€extensive€criminal€record.€ò òó óÐ d ´ Ðà  àFor€the€reasons€stated€òòinóó€òòfra.óó,€we€find€that€the€trial€court€properly€denied€the€defendantððsÐ P!  Ðrequest€for€probation€or€alternative€sentencing.€Furthermore,€we€hold€that€the€allegation€thatÐ <"Œ  Ðpetitionerððs€guilty€plea€was€involuntarily€entered€is€without€merit.Ð (#x! ÐÓ  Óò òòòWithdrawal€of€Guilty€Pleasóóó óÐ $d" ÐÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€alleges€that€it€was€error€for€the€trial€court€to€deny€his€motion€to€withdraw€hisÐ %P # Ðpleas€of€guilt.€€Specifically,€the€defendant€asserts€that€his€pleas€were€not€made€knowingly€becauseÐ ì%