WPC +jaLiM+|Hʿ:>!2q8 KW/E88M^in(Ȃ|k~O×*~5Z,UYN7.xh bgjjXxCLec1] N@B,Q-;CE?`pq|9e Vn$~e}l{nQJYH3ܻ8FV)s'ϥ~8c[54T@C.Q#&Qj~`(Hk8H__Uje00vctcx6.T#@$J?JYzyJV*50QhKgw wLk?["tiבURb$J?[p{)tQwZMſ 0DS D/ B<6X9`(Courier 10 X- -3|x<6X9`(Courier 10Xx6X@29X@($  TR[A'LEGAL3'A' Legal3'T  X XXXX XXX uM%-^AZ"Arial RegularHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh DDeDDDӀ*  >Times New Roman Bold Italic((3|$ !  TR[A'LEGAL3'A' Legal3'T   X8DXX XX2=XX X8D      0  (#$  0   XCXX X XXC   Ad FILEDXCX   November3,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ,cAZ"Arial Regular d'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !  TR[A'LEGAL3'A' Legal3'T   X8DXX XX2=XX X8D  72=XXdd7  XXX2=*Yr*<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxPX  rߛ@ D XCX*YINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @rr)DATNASHVILLEo[X` hDp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?ACXoSAMJOHNPASSARELLA,   D ) `  `     h    D ) p C.C.A.NO.01C019801CR00049 L    ` Appellant,   h    D ) p (No.C7353Below) 8   `     h    D ) p DAVIDSONCOUNTY  $ t VS. `     h    D )  `  `     h    D ) p TheHon.SethNorman  L  STATEOFTENNESSEE, h    D )  8    `     h    D )  p (DismissalofPostConvictionPetition)  $   ` Appellee.   h    D )    `     h    D ) p AFFIRMEDPURSUANTTORULE20   @kk+DORDER  p  `  ThismatterisbeforetheCourtuponthestatesmotionrequestingthatthejudgmentintheabovestyledcausebeaffirmedpursuanttoRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules.Theappellantopposesthemotion. `  Thepetitionerwasconvictedoftwocountsofaggravatedkidnappingandwassentencedtoconsecutivesentencestotalingly70years.ThisCourtaffirmedthejudgmentinStatev.SamJohnPassarellav.State,No.81260III(Tenn.Crim.App.,atNashville,October  ` 1,1982),anditdoesnotappearthatanapplicationforpermissiontoappealwasfiledintheSupremeCourt.Thereafter,thedismissalofthepetitionersfirstpetitionforpostconvictionreliefwasupheldbythisCourt.Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619(Tenn. t% $ Crim.App.1994).ThepetitionerfiledhissecondpostconvictionpetitiononMay9,1996.OnJanuary20,1998,thetrialcourtdismissedthepetitionasoutsidethestatuteoflimitation.Weaffirm. `  Thepetitionerconcedesthatthispetitionforpostconvictionreliefwasfiledoutsidethestatuteoflimitation.Instead,heisseekingreliefundertheholdinginBurford <0+0 v.State,845S.W.2ds204(Tenn.1992). 2X-2  `  UnderBurford,ourSupremeCourtheldthatalate-filedpetitionfor 506 post-convictionreliefmaybeallowedifthestatuteoflimitationviolatesdueprocessasappliedtothatpetitionerwhenthegovernment'sinterestinadministrativeefficiencyandeconomydoesnotoutweighthepetitioner'sinterestandthereisnothingstaleorfraudulent ;T6< regardingpetitioner'sclaim.845S.W.2dat209-210.ThepetitionerhasfailedtoallegeanyinterestswhichwouldallowtheexceptiontothestatuteoflimitationsunderBurford. | Furthermore,thereisnoevidenceintherecordofanyexceptionapplyingunderT.C.A.40-30-202(b)(1997Repl.).Accordingly,wefindthatthestatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentpursuanttoRule20iswelltaken.񛜛 `  ITIS,THEREFORE,ORDEREDthatthestatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtunderRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules,isgranted,andthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.Itappearingthatthepetitionerisindigent,costsoftheseproceedingsaretaxedtothestate. `     h    D  p _____________________________ `     h    D  p JOHNH.PEAY,JUDGECONCUR:_____________________________  JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE_____________________________THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGE