WPC *>X <ꥅJ g%dJkum{%TaȦ"I@uLp !`u)!_ ^Vx Uv,)SXtbO:Ro_e>L5/f;|J1\&/jq,{2sDp0&r|kv]9דv2kE]kͅnN'>T, dÛnעfnq8Ytm$IjA!@ܣn*hq^,~摡SIcH7WTMwu(.TozhSt>I5/~z>N{}dU݊lNUk]qh+(Rit ys tVVZPj]mhh'}Ýf+s:( 5-wUb#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz U@   ] #N 0DE:|<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<b 0 B 0 D3l D- 0K ASj 00 0D AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60+ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularYo)X` C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU(")  Z(Times New Roman Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  R$      1    _Accordingtothe_presentence_Ԁreport,thepriorconvictioninvolvedtenpoundsofmarijuana.(#$  0   r R$      2    _Theexactamountofmarijuanaseizedwasnotidentifiedduringthesentencinghearing.Theindictmentrefers  to494.7grams.Theofficersreturnonthesearchwarrantindicatedtheseizureofthreeandonehalfpounds.- -(|G2$ !.8Gdd8         0   d(|3t$ !.8Gdd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3t$ !.8Gdd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Gdd8     _   G8IXXdd8@ttFGINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#GF #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsJune13,2001 @  L XIXG #GXXI#STATEOF_TENNESSEE_Ԁv.PAULR._PEARCYXIXG  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforDecaturCounty  J @@No.99CR572C.CreedMcGinley,CircuitJudge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200002867CCAR3CD_Ԅ_ԀFiledAugust14,_2001_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     ThedefendantpledguiltytotheClassEfelonyoffenseofpossessionofthreeandonehalfpounds x  ofmarijuanawithintenttomanufacture,deliverorsell,andtotheClassAmisdemeanorof d possessionofunlawfuldrugparaphernalia.HenowappealshistwoyearsentencetotheDepartment P ofCorrection.Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. <   Tenn.R.App.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed.  d   #GXI#XIX.GCorneliaA.Clark,Sp.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJoeG.RileyandNorma < McGeeOgle,JJ.,joined. ( MikeMosierandSteveBeal,AttorneysforDefendant,PaulR.Pearcy.  Paul_G._ԀSummers,AttorneyGeneral,JohnH.Bledsoe,AssistantAttorneyGeneral,G.Robert  Radford,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,andJerryW.Wallace,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral, t AttorneysfortheStateofTennessee. ` ?@@OO& OPINION #GXXIn#XIXG 8!  #GXXI% #XIXG    AppellantPaulR.PearcywasindictedbytheDecaturCountygrandjuryinOctober1999on #`" onecountofpossessionofmarijuana,aScheduleVIcontrolledsubstance,aClassEfelony,andone #L# countofunlawfuluseofdrugparaphernalia,aClassAmisdemeanor.OnMay17,2000,appellant $8 $ enteredapleaofguiltytobothoffenses. %$!%   AsentencinghearingwasconductedOctober19,2000#GXXI #XIXG.Bothappellantandhiswifetestified. '"' Attheconclusionofthehearingthetrialjudgesentencedappellanttoservetwoyearsinthe (#( DepartmentofCorrectiononthefelonycharge.Onthemisdemeanorchargehesentencedthe )$) appellanttoserveelevenmonthstwentyninedaysofconfinementinthecountyjail,withsupervised p*%* probationauthorizedafterserviceofsixtydays.Thetrialcourtorderedthesentencestorun \+&+ concurrently,creatinganeffectivetwoyearsentencetotheDepartmentofCorrection. H,',  4-(-  XIXXXI  Whenanaccusedchallengesthelength,rangeorthemannerofserviceofasentence,this  courthasadutytoconductadenovoreviewofthesentencewithapresumptionthatthe  determinationsmadebythetrialcourtarecorrect.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d).This  presumptionis,however, conditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialcourt t consideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Ashby,823 ` S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991). L    Inconductingadenovoreviewofasentence,thiscourtmustconsider(a)theevidence,if $ t any,receivedatthetrialandthesentencinghearing;(b)thepresentencereport;(c)theprinciples  ` ofsentencingandargumentsastosentencingalternatives;(d)thenatureandcharacteristicsofthe  L  criminalconductinvolved;(e)anystatutorymitigatingorenhancementfactors;(f)anystatements  8  thatthedefendantmadeonhisownbehalf;and(g)thepotentialorlackofpotentialforrehabilitation $  ortreatment.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035102,103,and210;SeeStatev.Smith,735S.W.2d859,   863(Tenn.Crim.App.1987).   #XIXX XIi# XIXXXI  Ifourreviewreflectsthatthetrialcourtfollowedthestatutorysentencingprocedure,imposed   alawfulsentenceafterhavinggivendueconsiderationandproperweighttothefactorsand p principlessetoutunderthesentencinglaw,andmadefindingsoffactadequatelysupportedbythe \ record,thenwemaynotmodifythissentenceevenifwewouldhavepreferredadifferentresult. H Statev.Fletcher,805_S.W._Ԁ2d785,789(Tenn._Crim_.App.1991). 4 #XIXX XIW#  Inthisappeal,appellantchallengesonlythemannerofserviceofhissentence.Asasserted  \ inhisbrief: H $XXX$ ` Thedefendantdoesnottakeissuewiththelengthofthesentenceimposedby   thetrialcourtinthismatter.Further,thedefendantdoesnotseriouslychallengethe   trialcourtsdeterminationthatheshouldservethesentenceinitsentirety.The  defendantdoesrespectfullyurgethatthetrialcourtsjudgmentthatheservethe  sentenceintheDepartmentofCorrectionwasincorrect,undertheparticularfactsand  circumstancesofhiscase. l ( XXX( XIXXXIHecontendsthathisserioushealthproblemsrequirethatheservehissentenceinthelocaljail,where D! hiswifecanvisitdailyandassistjailersincaringforhim. 0"    Itisuncontrovertedthattheappellanthasserious,chronichealthproblems.Appellantis $X" diabeticandrequiresdailyinsulinshots.Hehasagastriculcer.Atthetimeofthesentencing $D # hearinghehadjustundergoneheartsurgery.Healsohasseveralorthopedicinjuriesstemmingfrom %0!$ aJune1999automobileaccident.Accordingtoappellantswife,shemustbathehim,cookforhim, &"% shavehim,andperformallhouseholdservices.Thetrialcourtfoundappellantshealthtobea '#& mitigatingfactor. (#'   )$(   However,thetrialcourtplacedgreatweightontheoneenhancementfactorfoundthe  existenceofapriorcriminalconvictionformanufactureofmarijuana. #  1      ׀Thecourtemphasizedthat   thecrimewassimilarinnatureandnotdistantintime.Eventhoughtheappellanthadsuccessfully  completedhisearliercommunitycorrectionssentence,thecourtfoundthatcommissionofasecond t similaroffensewasevidenceoffailuretoberehabilitated.Further,thecourtfoundthattheamount ` ofmarijuanainvolvedT #  2      ׀alsoindicatedaseriousproblem.Thetrialcourtthereforefoundthat L  presumptionofeligibilityforalternativesentencingwasrebutted.Weagree. 8  #XIXX XI#  Atrialcourthasdiscretiontosentenceadefendanttoeitheralocaljailorworkhouse.  ` However,failuretodosodoesnotconstituteabuseofdiscretion.Aprisonerhasnoconstitutional  L  righttoincarcerationinaparticularinstitution.Francev.Bradley,922S.W.2d118,119(Tenn.  8  App.1998).E.g.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035306,307,314.Healthlimitations,standingalone,do $  notmeritalternativesentencing.SeeStatev.RobertHallWayman,No.E199902042CCAR3CD,   LoudonCounty(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,April9,2001).Thetrialcourtactedwithinits   discretion.     Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. p    `     h     ____________________________________  p    `     h     CORNELIAA.CLARK,SPECIALJUDGE