WPCB 74tA;R6 (rͬ(Ȫf7<^O )_"e9*2:{Wz5杍X$<_3ڷ+C ( ӎ4,le M9$QҁW\1ԕ $v |^GMJ1,lKƀ |7}B`u!{O>B .vfOq<co&efa^+ˆRAo =*ŧ=޳Zsg.fx]l%/J#CXw"|Q3UuE"p>bN,C* ]`k   I 1N\\^E`b d 72x 1u 72 0cQ 0U 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0a 0C5 0x 0O 0# 0 0b 0 Y 0 0 0{! 0@;" 0{" 0O# 0 $ 0$ 0% 0& 0F' 0( 0<( 0) 0>) 0v) 0`s* 0`* 3+ 0`G+ 0`+ 0`, 08g, AM, 0,o/-@- 02- 0'. #/ 0:7/ q/ 0_/ 0 / 00011 B11 02 D33 D-3 0K3 0 NI4 AS44 05 0DT6 A6 0jC7 08 B*1: D/[: 0: D/< 0=< 06 = 0A= 0:I> 0^> 0<>U6?U*S?}?@A , (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularyG*bk2P'3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 40500\  `&Times New RomanLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList1I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I./research/buttonTFLink?_m=4cdcb3bde87f8aba745ecd12f821240c&_xfercite=%3ccite%20cc%3d%22USA%22%3e%3c%21%5bCDATA%5b2001%20Tenn.%20/research/buttonTFLink?_m=4cdcb3bde87f8aba745ecd12f821240c&_xfercite=%3ccite%20cc%3d%22USA%22%3e%3c%21%5bCDATA%5b2001%20Tenn.%207421-16I.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0   *+ (_2623  ..*G+M (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal*D+M (_24   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *A+M (_23  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *>+M (_22   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *;+M (_21   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *8+M (_20  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *5+M (_19   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *2+M (_18    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  * (_1723  Ԁ*GM (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *DM (_15   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *AM (_14  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *>M (_13   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *;M (_12   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  - -64Hyperlink    *8M (_11  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *5M (_10   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  (2M &_9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  ( &_823  (GM &_7   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  (DM &_6   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  (AM &_5  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  (>M &_4   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  (;M &_3   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  (8M &_2  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  (5M &_1   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  &2M $_    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  <:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1      (&H2  (&H3  clsccl2(&H4 XXX (&H5  (&H6  20AddressX[ZA<< c8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5WPC+.+.I,*CITE,dl*CODEKn<6X9`(Courier NewKS \  `&Times New RomanS7421-1542Emphasisclsccl3<:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard Kn<6X9`(Courier NewKS \  `&Times New RomanS (|G2$ !.8%dd8         0   d/research/buttonTFLink?_m=4cdcb3bde87f8aba745ecd12f821240c&_xfercite=%3ccite%20cc%3d%22USA%22%3e%3c%21%5bCDATA%5b2001%20Tenn.%20(|3?`$ !.8%dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  (O$^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?`$ !.8%dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK<:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/Kn<6X9`(Courier NewKS \  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7e(X7  ?o%2A`Arial?  S \  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7&  d dd)1dxd<:zTop of For7g(X7  ?o%2A`Arial?  S \  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7d)2dxd0KS.SampleKn<6X9`(Courier NewKS \  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKn<6X9`(Courier NewKS \  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  <6X9`(Courier New%2A`Arial/research/buttonTFLink?_m=c3aa4b26603df6edcd1c6eeaa598155a&_xfercite=%3ccite%20cc%3d%22USA%22%3e%3c%21%5bCDATA%5b2001%20Tenn.%20/research/buttonTFLink?_m=c3aa4b26603df6edcd1c6eeaa598155a&_xfercite=%3ccite%20cc%3d%22USA%22%3e%3c%21%5bCDATA%5b2001%20Tenn.%20/research/buttonTFLink?_m=c3aa4b26603df6edcd1c6eeaa598155a&_xfercite=%3ccite%20cc%3d%22USA%22%3e%3c%21%5bCDATA%5b2001%20Tenn.%20 !.8%dd8     _   %8O XXdd8@tt %INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#% #Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsNovember28,2001 L XO X% #%XXO "#STATEOFTENNESSEEv._FARON_ԀDOUGLASPIERCEXO X%  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforKnoxCounty  J @@No.67174BRayL.Jenkins,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200100437CCAR3CDFiledApril9,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Defendantappealshisconvictionforrobbery.Defendantcontendsthat(1)theevidencewas x  insufficienttosupporttheconvictionand(2)thatthetrialcourterredinadmittingtestimony d regardingpriorinconsistentstatements.Weaffirmthetrialcourtjudgment. P  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed  (x   #%XO #XO X.%JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_and P AlanE.Glenn,JJ.,joined. < J._Liddell_ԀKirk,Knoxville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,_Faron_ԀDouglasPierce.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;ThomasE.Williams,III,AssistantAttorney  General;RandallEugene_Nichols_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andRobertL._Jolley_,Jr.,Assistant  DistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. t @@OO& OPINION #%XXO #XO X% 8!    XOnJanuary25,1999,aKnoxCounty#%XXO D #XO X% XO XXXO grandjuryindicteddefendant_Faron_ԀDouglasPierce #`" foraggravatedrobbery,aClassBfelony,inviolationofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection3913 #L# 402.OnNovember15,2000,defendantwasconvictedofrobbery,aClassCfelony.OnJanuary $8 $ 4,2001,thetrialcourtconductedasentencinghearinganddeterminedthatdefendantwasaRange %$!% IIIpersistentoffender.ThetrialcourtsentenceddefendanttoservefifteenyearsintheTennessee &"& DepartmentofCorrection. '"'  (#( DefendantfiledatimelymotionfornewtrialonJanuary16,2001,andthetrialcourtheld )$) ahearingonJanuary26,2001.Defendantsmotionwasdeniedbythetrialcourt.Defendantfiled p*%* atimelynoticeofappealonFebruary26,2001. \+&+  H,',  4-(- _ԇ X  Facts       Thevictim,JohnSchober,testifiedthatonOctober22,1998,hewasworkingasthecashier  attheNorthshoreTexacoinKnoxville.Thevictimtestifiedthatatabout7:30p.m.,defendant t enteredthestorewithanotherindividual,codefendantDavidC.McFalls.Thetwoindividuals ` walkedtothebackofthestoreandlookedatproductsonthemedicineaisle.Oneofthemenheld L  apackageandaddressedtheclerkasking, [d]oesthiscontainaspirin?Thevictimputonhis 8  glasses,walkedtothebackofthestore,andreadthepacket.Heanswered, Yesandreturnedto $ t hispositionbehindthecounteratthefrontofthestore.Thetwoindividualsreturnedtothefrontof  ` thestore,andthevictimbegantoringuptheirpurchases.Asthecodefendantstoodinfrontofthe  L  counter,defendantcamebehindthecounterand suckerpunchedthevictim,knockinghimtothe  8  floor.Defendanttriedtoopenthecashregisterbutwasunsuccessfulbecausethevictimlockedthe $  registerjustpriortothemenenteringthestore.Thevictimtestifiedthatdefendantstated, [o]pen   theM!F!drawerorIllkillyou,andthevictimopenedthedrawer.Thevictimtestifiedthat   defendantemptiedthecashdrawerandtoldthevictimto stayonthefloororelse[defendantwould   killthevictim].Thetwomenfledthestore.     Policerecoveredevidencefromthescene,includingaTylenolcontainerwithdefendants \ fingerprintsandavideofromthestoresecuritycameraoperatingatthetimeoftherobbery.Ata H laterdate,thevictimidentifieddefendantinaphotgraphlineup.Thevictimalsoidentifieddefendant 4 attrialandfurthertestifiedafterviewingthevideotapeattrialthatthevideotapewasanaccurate  p depictionofwhathappenedthenightoftherobbery.  \   ThevictimtestifiedthatitwasthecodefendantwhoactuallybroughttheTylenolcontainer 4 tothecounter.Thevictimalsostatedthatitwascommonformanyitemsinthestoretobetouched   orpickedupbydifferentcustomers.Oncrossexamination,thevictimtestifiedthatthemost   distinguishingcharacteristichecouldrecallabouttheindividualwhostruckhimwasthatthe  individualseemedtohavenoteeth.Hetestifiedthathegaveadescriptionoftheindividualtothe  police.Hestatedthathedidnottellthepoliceanythingregardingtheindividualsfacialhair.  However,thephotohepickedoutwasofanindividualwithfacialhair.Hefinallystatedthatpolice l didnotaskanyquestionsaboutotherphysicalcharacteristics.Onredirect,hetestifiedthathepicked X  outthephotorightaway,withnohelp,andthathedidnotknowthatthepersonhepickedoutinthe D! photowouldhavefingerprintsatthesceneonthecounter. 0"    EricHowardTucktestifiedthathewasattheNorthshoreTexacoonthenightoftherobbery. $X" Hetestifiedthat,asheenteredtheTexaco,hesawtwomenrunpasthim,althoughhecouldnot $D # positivelyidentifythem. %0!$   TimSchadetestifiedthatheisaseniorevidencetechnicianattheKnoxvillePoliceCrime '#& Lab.Hetestifiedthatheexaminedthefingerprintsliftedfromthesceneandthatthefingerprints (#' takenfromtheTylenolcontainermatchedwithdefendant.Itwasafourteenpointmatch,andthe )$( printswere unquestionablydefendants. |*%)  h+&*   KenSlagletestifiedthatheisaninvestigatorwiththeKnoxvilleCityPoliceDepartment,  wherehehasworkedforthirtyyears.Hetestifiedthatafterthelabascertainedwhosefingerprints  wereontheTylenolcontainer,heobtainedaphotoofdefendant.Helaterinterviewedthevictim.  Hestatedthatthevictimimmediatelyidentifieddefendantsphoto.Oncrossexamination,Detective t Slagletestifiedthatheinterviewedthevictimatthecrimescene,andthevictimgaveadescription ` ofthesuspectwhohadstruckhimasbeingawhitemale,twentytothirtyyearsold,approximately L  fivefeetandsixorseveninchestall,140to150pounds,withamustacheandbeard,wearingablue 8  shirtandabandana,andhavingnoteeth. $ t   GaryPricestatedthatheisasergeantwiththeKnoxvilleCityPoliceOrganizedCrimeUnit.  L  Hestatedthathearresteddefendant.Hestatedthatdefendanthadamissingtooth.Further,hestated  8  thatdefendantdeniedtherobbery. $    DefensewitnessKimberlySwineytestifiedthatshewasafriendofdefendant.Shetestified   thatdefendantstayedatherhomeduringOctoberbecausedefendantsmotherrequestedthatMs.   Swineycarefordefendantafterhewasseriouslyinjured.Shetestifiedthatdefendanthadaslight   concussion#XO XX XO # XO XXXO ,brokenribs,swolleneyes,andwouldhaveshortnessofbreathwhenwalking.Shestated p thathisphysicalinjuriesaffectedhisabilitytowalkandmovearound,andthatsheneversaw \ defendantrun.ShestatedthatdefendantshealthimprovedafterHalloweenof1998. H   DefensewitnessDavidMcFalls,whowasoriginallychargedasacodefendant,testifiedthat  p hepledguiltytorobberyregardinghisinvolvementwiththiscase.Hetestifiedthathewasoneof  \ twomeninvolvedintheincidentbutthatdefendantwasnotthereandwasnottheotherindividual. H Oncrossexamination,McFallswasaskedif,afterpreviouslyviewingthevideooftherobbery,he 4 identifieddefendanttoanassistantdistrictattorneyasbeingtheotherpersononthesecuritycamera   video.McFallstestifiedthattheotherpersononthevideo favored[defendant].Overdefendants   objection,theStatewasallowedtocalltheassistantdistrictattorneywhotestifiedthatMcFalls,in  fact,previouslyidentifieddefendantastheotherpersononthesecuritycameravideo.     `   Attheconclusionoftheevidence,thejuryreturnedaverdictofguiltyforthecrimeof l robbery. X   X (5h83 XI.0  SufficiencyofEvidence h 0" (#(#  X, #l! Wereviewchallengestosufficiencyoftheevidenceaccordingtowellsettledprinciples. $X" Whenadefendantchallengesthesufficiencyoftheevidence,thisCourtmustdeterminewhether, $D # afterviewingtheevidenceinalightmostfavorabletotheprosecution,anyrationaltrieroffactcould %0!$ havefoundtheessentialelementsofacrimebeyondareasonabledoubt.Tenn.R.App.P.13(e); &"% Jacksonv.Virginia,443U.S.307,319(1979);Statev.Duncan,698S.W.2d63,67(Tenn.1985). '#& TheStateisentitledtothestrongestlegitimateviewoftheevidenceandallreasonableinferences (#' thatmaybedrawntherefrom.Statev.Cabbage,571S.W.2d832,835(Tenn.1978). )$(   |*%) Ѐ#XO XX XO &# XO XXXO Aguiltyverdictbythejury,approvedbythetrialjudge,accreditsthetestimonyoftheState's   witnessesandresolvesallconflictsinthetestimonyinfavoroftheState.#XO XX XO 0#   S 1   XO XXXO Statev.Cazes,875  S.W.2d253,259(Tenn.1994).#XO XX XO 1#% B %B2 XO XXXO GJVFBx \p+.@XEn^#XO XX XO 2# XO XXXO Althoughanaccusedisoriginallycloakedwithapresumptionof  innocence,ajuryverdictremovesthispresumptionandreplacesitwithoneofguilt.#XO XX XO |3# XO XXXO Statev.Tuggle, t 639S.W.2d913,914(Tenn.1982).#XO XX XO l4# XO XXXO ԀHence,onappeal,theburdenofproof% M #XO XX XO 4#%M<5 XO XXXO Ԁrestswiththedefendant ` todemonstratetheinsufficiencyoftheconvictingevidence.#XO XX XO }5# XO XXXO Tuggle,639S.W.2dat914.#XO XX XO .6# XO XXXO Ԁ% O #XO XX XO 6#%O64T 5  /  66\eDe  7  7 XO XXXO Onappeal, L   thestateisentitledtothestrongestlegitimateviewoftheevidenceaswellasallreasonableand 8  legitimateinferencesthatmaybedrawntherefrom.Id.#XO XX XO 7#/   XO XXXO ThisCourtmaynotsubstituteitsown $ t inferences forthosedrawnbythetrieroffactfromcircumstantialevidence.4 `5  9#XO XX XO !9#/  : XO XXXO Statev.Matthews,  ` 805S.W.2d776,779(Tenn.Crim.App.1990).69\eDe  7 9#XO XX XO :# XO XXXO ԀInconcludingourevaluationoftheconvicting  L  evidence,thisCourtisprecludedfromreweighingorreconsideringtheevidence.4W 5  :#XO XX XO ;#/  }< XO XXXO Statev.Morgan,  8  929S.W.2d380,383(Tenn.Crim.App.1996).6K<\eDe  7 _<#XO XX XO =# XO XXXO ԀWealsowillnotreweighajurysrejectionofa $  particulardefenseassertedbyadefendanttoexcusehisconduct.See,e.g.,4 Y5  <#XO XX XO >#/  > XO XXXO Cabbage,571S.W.2d   at835.6>\eDe  7 >#XO XX XO ?#%  %H@ XO XXXO      11݌̌  Defendantassertsthatthemainissueattrialwasoneofidentificationandthattheevidence ' adducedwasinsufficienttoconvicthimofrobbery.Wedisagreeandaffirmtheverdict.   R First,therecordfromtrialreflectsthatthevictimidentifieddefendantinaphotolineup.This A testimonywascorroboratedbyInvestigatorSlagle,whotestifiedthatheadministeredthephoto -} lineup.Throughsuchlineup,thevictimidentifieddefendantastheperpetrator.Further,attrial,the i victimidentifieddefendantastheonewhorobbedthevictimattheNorthshoreTexaco. U  D Second,defendantsfingerprintwasfoundonaTylenolcontainergatheredfromthescene  oftherobbery.ThevictimtestifiedthattheperpetratorsoftherobberybroughttheTylenolcontainer o fromtherearofthestoretothefrontandsetitonthecounter.ThetestimonyoftechnicianSchade [ wasthatthefourteenpointmatchfingerprintwas unquestionablydefendants. G   Third,thecodefendantstatedinapoliceinterviewthatapersonseenonavideofromthe   storessecuritycamerarobbingthestorefavoreddefendant.  !  "@  Finally,thejuryinthiscaseviewedthevideotapetakenfromthestoresecuritycamera. /$ Thus,thejurywasabletowatchthevictimidentifydefendantonthevideotape,andthejurywasable %k  toseethatthepersononthevideotapecommittingtherobberywasindeeddefendant.  &W!!  F'""  Weconcludethattheevidenceadducedattrial,whichconsistedoffingerprintevidence, (## eyewitnessidentification,avideotapeoftherobbery,andthecodefendantsstatement,issufficient q)$$ tosupportthejurysverdict.Weaffirm.  ]*%%   I+&&  S#XO XX XO f@# XO XXXO  KXII.0  PriorInconsistentStatements(#(# #XO XX XO iI#   XKIDefendantassertsthatthetrialcourt,overdefendantsobjection,improperlyadmitted  evidenceofthecodefendantspriorstatementtopoliceregardingtheidentificationoftheperpetrator t oftherobbery. `  L  Rule613(b)oftheTennesseeRulesofEvidencegovernstheadmissibilityofwitnessprior 8  inconsistentstatements.Itstates: $ t ` `  KXExtrinsicevidenceofapriorinconsistentstatementbyawitnessis  ` notadmissibleunlessthewitnessisaffordedanopportunityto  L  explainordenythesameandtheoppositepartyisaffordedan  8  opportunitytointerrogatethewitnessthereon,ortheinterestsof $  justiceotherwiserequire.      ` L` L XO XXXO       Therulerequiresthatthepriorstatementbeinconsistentwiththewitness#XO XX XO M#N   XO XXXO Ԁtrial#XO XX XO N#NNeDe   XO XXXO testimony.   4qim\O  5  #XO XX XO DO#   S O  /   XO XXXO p?Statev.Brady,2001Tenn.Crim.App.LEXIS28,6O\OOave  7imO#XO XX XO sP# XO XXXO ԀatP=*9,No.M199902253CCAR3CD,2001WL   30220,at*9(Tenn.Crim.App.,filedJanuary12,2001,atNashville#XO XX XO eQ# XO XXXO Q=),perm.toappealdenied,(Tenn. p 2001);seealso4rimt \O  5  #XO XX XO SR#/   XO XXXO RDoochinv.U.S.Fidelity&Guar.Co.,854S.W.2d109,114(Tenn.Ct.App.1993). \ S6R\OSave  7im4S#XO XX XO S# S O#P݌̌  N    Inhistestimony,codefendantMcFallstestifiedthatamanbythenameofKennethWhaley 4 waspresentattherobberyandnotdefendant.Oncrossexamination,thecodefendantdeniedthat  p hepreviouslymadeapretrialstatementtotheassistantdistrictattorneythatdefendantparticipated  \ intherobbery.Thecodefendantalsostatedthatheviewedthestoresecuritycameravideowiththe H assistantdistrictattorney,buthedeniedtellingtheassistantdistrictattorneythatthevideocaptured 4 defendantcommittingtherobbery.Hetestifiedthathepreviouslystatedtheindividualonthevideo    favoreddefendant.   h          Afterthistestimony,theprosecutoragainquestionedthecodefendantatlengthconcerning  theidentificationofdefendantastheonewhowaspresentattherobbery.Attemptingtoclarifyany  discrepancybetweenhistrialtestimonyandhispreviousstatements,thecodefendantstatedthat l whenhepreviouslymadetheallegedidentificationofdefendant,thecodefendantwasonnerve X  pills.DefensecounselagainquestionedthecodefendantbrieflybeforetheStateofferedrebuttal D! testimonyregardingthepriorstatements.Overthedefensesobjections,thetrialcourtallowedthe 0"  assistantdistrictattorneytotestify.Shestatedthatthecodefendantmadeapretrialstatementthat #l! defendantwasanaccompliceintherobbery.Theassistantdistrictattorneyalsotestifiedthattheco $X" defendant,afterviewingthevideofromthesecuritycamera,madeapretrialidentificationof $D # defendantastheaccomplice. %0!$  &"%  XO XXXO   Weconcludethatthetestimonyofferedbytheassistantdistrictattorneyforthepurposesof '#& impeachingthecodefendantwasproper.A priorinconsistentstatementmaybeadmissibletotest (#' thecredibilityofawitness.Statev.Woods,No.W200100316CCAR3CD,2001Tenn.Crim. )$( App.LEXIS797,at*15(Tenn.Crim.App.,filedOct.,5,2001,atJackson)(citing4p \O  5  #XO XX XO \#   S O_  /   XO XXXO Statev.Smith, |*%) 24S.W.3d274,279(Tenn.2000))6^\O^ave  7imv"_#XO XX XO _# XO XXXO ._P O__݌ h+&* Ќ      Inthiscase,theprosecutorproperlylaidafoundationbyallowingthecodefendantample ? opportunitytoexplainthedifferencesbetweenhisincourttestimonyofdenyingdefendants + participationandthepretrialstatementswhereinheallegedlyidentifieddefendant.Upon  examination,thecodefendantdeniedstatingthatdefendantparticipatedintherobbery.The  requirementforadmissionofthestatementwasmetatthatpoint,andtheassistantdistrictattorneys   testimonyregardingthecodefendantspriorstatementswasproper.Theissueiswithoutmerit.    XK L S#XO XX XO `#`  X @`  @  @  @h  @  @ CONCLUSION     Xd       dFortheforegoingreasons,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. x        `     h  f   R   >   *z  f    @`  @  @  @h  @  @  @p ____________________________________ R f `     h     %XXO JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE#XO X%rg#