WPC 6GQzȑ1Tkیh+qhL/ ӽ?p:y_6Y918v^Q31i n6@: A9,% ^pj gg1׮?Y4mU]"wq=8+ F%KIdp1A5ԓWM_SU:VIߒ{C^&Z8erJMU?(`-ZIo꺤5zeR| #[40kwo;.h)2Mg7ՋP?wO|A^V̙os{k6?Rӷ ڱigxH>h!?5epcC(2ec< OXm҅iO'}8՘4@d:wLrQ5_^Zu$pRQS}xPEJԆvEd_;fs""8+W Q̿ ^CU`Vb#\ % # 0+ UN ^  w z  4] q  m  _ %  NEb 0 B 0 D5i D- 0K ASi 0/ 0D AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60 (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular$-s  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptYo)+003|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2$ !.8BmdXXd8         0  E d(|3W$ !.8BmdXXd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3W$ !.8BmdXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Bmdd8     _   Bm8XXdd8@ttABmINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#BmA #Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsOctober1,2002 L XXBm #BmXX#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.TRACYR.PIPESXXBm  J @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Hardin_ԀCounty  J @@No.7803C.Creed_McGinley_,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200200433CCAR3CD_Ԅ_ԀFiledDecember12,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Thedefendant,TracyR.Pipes,appealsthe_Hardin_ԀCountyCircuitCourtsrevocationofherdrug x  offenseprobation.ThecourtorderedhertoservetheeffectiveeightyearsentenceintheDepartment d ofCorrection.Becausetherecordsupportsthelowercourtsactions,weaffirm. P #BmXX#XXBm Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtisAffirmed.  d   #BmX#XX.BmJames_Curwood_Ԁ_Witt_,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Wellesand < AlanE.Glenn,JJ.,joined. ( RichardW._DeBerry_,AssistantDistrictPublicDefender,Camden,Tennessee,fortheAppellant,  TracyR.Pipes.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;P.RobinDixon,Jr.,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; t G.Robert_Radford_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andJohn_Overton_,AssistantDistrictAttorney ` General,fortheAppellee,StateofTennessee. L  L@@OO& OPINION #BmXX{#XXBm $"t! #BmXX #  XXBm   ` OnAugust2,1999,thetrialcourtprobatedthedefendantseffectiveeightyear #L# sentence,andinadditiontoregularconditionsofprobation,thecourtorderedthedefendantto $8 $ submittorandomdrugandalcoholtests.OnApril30,2001,aprobationviolationreportwasfiled, %$!% allegingthatthedefendanthadfailedtoreportforthreeconsecutivemonthsandwasinarrearsin &"& payinghersupervisionfees.ThereportwasamendednumeroustimesthroughSeptember17,2001, '"' whenthestatefiledareportonthatdatewhich,inadditiontotheoriginalclaims,allegedthatthe (#( defendantsarrearageinpayingfeeshadextendedtothirteenmonths;thatshehadfailedtoappear )$) incourtforherrevocationhearingonMay15,June14,andSeptember11,2001;thatshetested p*%* positivelyforbarbiturates,marijuana,andopiates;andthat,althoughtherevocationproceedingshad \+&+ beencontinuedtoallowthedefendanttoseekdrugtreatment,shehadfailedtoreporttoher H,', probationofficerfollowingtheorderallowingtreatmentandcontinuingtheprobationproceedings. 4-(- _ԇ   ` IntheJanuary22,2002revocationhearing,thedefendantsprobationofficertestified  thatthedefendantfailedtoreportinthemonthsofDecember2000throughApril2001andthat,as  ofSeptember2001,shewasthirteenmonthsinarrearsinpayinghersupervisionfees.Shetested  positivelyfordrugsonJune26,2001.Aftertheoriginalprobationreportwasfiled,shewasallowed t toseekdrugtreatmentonJuly30,2001,butshefailedtoreportafterthatdate.Shefailedtoappear ` incourtonSeptember11,2001.Oncrossexamination,theofficeracknowledgedthat,althoughthe L  defendanthadreceivedtwopositivedrugtests,shehadalsoreceivednegativetests. 8     ` Thedefendanttestifiedthatshemissedsomereportingappointmentsbecauseshewas  ` pregnant.ShemissedanappointmentonMarch8,2001,becauseshedeliveredthebabyonthat  L  date.Shetestifiedthatherpositivedrugtestwastheresultofhertakingmedicationforbackpain.  8  SheblamedherfailuretoappearincourtinSeptember2001ongetting acallsayingthat[she] $  didnthavetobehere,thattheyhadrescheduledCourt.      ` Inmakinghisfindings,thetrialjudgesaid, IdontbelieveMs.Pipes[s]testimony   hasawholelotofcandor.HefoundtheexplanationformissingtheSeptembercourtdatetobe    prettyincredibleandthatherhistorywas totallyunsatisfactory.Thejudgefoundthat,evenif p heattributedsomeofhernonfeasancetomedicalproblems,shehadfailedtoreportaftershe \ deliveredherchild.Herresponsetotheopportunitytoobtaindrugtreatment wastodisappearand H notcomebacktoCourt....ShesintheD.O.C. 4    ` Thestandardofreviewuponappealofanorderrevokingprobationistheabuseof  \ discretionstandard.Statev.Harkins,811S.W.2d79,82(Tenn.1991).Inorderforanabuseof H discretiontooccur,thereviewingcourtmustfindthattherecordcontainsnosubstantialevidence 4 tosupporttheconclusionofthetrialjudgethataviolationofthetermsofprobationhasoccurred.   Id.;Statev.Delp,614S.W.2d395,398(Tenn.Crim.App.1980).Thetrialcourtisrequiredonlyto   findthattheviolationofprobationoccurredbyapreponderanceoftheevidence.Tenn.CodeAnn.  40-35-311(e)(Supp.2000).Uponfindingaviolation,thetrialcourtisvestedwiththestatutory  authorityto"revokeprobationandsuspensionofsentenceandcausethedefendanttocommencethe  executionofthejudgmentasoriginallyentered."Id.Furthermore,whenprobationisrevoked,"the l originaljudgmentsorenderedbythetrialjudgeshallbeinfullforceandeffectfromthedateofthe X  revocationofsuchsuspension."Id.40-35-310(1997).Thetrialjudgeretainsthediscretionary D! authoritytoorderthedefendanttoservetheoriginalsentence.SeeStatev.Duke,902S.W.2d424, 0"  427(Tenn.Crim.App.1995). #l!    ` Onappeal,thedefendantarguesthatthetrialcourtsdecisiontorevokeprobationwas $D # arbitrary.Wedisagree.Thelowercourtsdecisiontorevokethedefendantsprobationissupported %0!$ bysubstantialevidencethatthedefendantviolatedconditionsofherprobation.Baseduponthefacts &"% inevidencethatthedefendantuseddrugswhileonprobationandrepeatedlyfailedtoreporttoher '#& probationofficer,therevocationofprobationiswarranted. (#'    ` Weaffirmthelowercourtsjudgment. |*%)  h+&* Ѐ   `     h     ___________________________________     `     h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE