ÿWPCR Í]ï&‰5Õ\_ö"Ì;dn׸ÿk+ãd,qÕf¡ŠÉQÌÑâõQ¯¾»à‘iôð1i[x‘¨0#.@ûÜÊ-3OO/€îŒ~?êæq,6¥ÑfS¼ÞîZ¬~Ù€ígýŒf@þz/nŸãNÂ!Ìe§sh¡‚ºr2^ =ôœÙ³hyn?’ü‚npàbbÅÇO¬W\­0èôõꪔ9¤$óû_¯P“ R3ˆ5"¦ÆÃ³UÈ5a$å^é( †¦V|Àÿÿ¢‹Ý¿ÜãªõT>yšœ›ƒRÝHµjSIZRc)ê,_àv°ex{ˆhÉýMü¼”äà¡'þXÖµ1rjïMW™±Ñp·Eƒž¤;{º´æàŸDFyrXˆH{ ÂW¸«â¶[¼ Â’j8dýUk2¼6ãvši%Áb'$"^‹ }0Åf!ôÏ›é2y>ïŸit—΄œ™u|Ÿ}9bjjåbO0„`¸3ÌðmÅåëѦZ»íð`ˆS÷@<bªtЏGþKã& ã[5·£œømš……uràmÝmÛòÚýÑõ_ÎÚú¦J.ÓMIÇ–…ÖÅ…Ÿrqu9ƒR ìpHdrÏùZòȰÔuQ³ØbT‡Í•”ÇÝñb#É\ %% ^ + 0ˆ7 U4N¿ w 4 z% ÒŸ q € m‚ ‚ Æ™ Æ_ Æ%Æë 0D±NõUN÷÷EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEbGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG 0ëOOOO B:: 0¤W D3û D-. 0K[[ AS¦Æù 0¤¿ 0Dc A«§˜\\IB01S08T\knoxclerk3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»îšQ/Ï (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularóbï. File ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó&Öd9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular- ù-(|G2È$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€½»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¬Åò»»Ô d(|3~$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€½»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3~$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€½»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€½»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼½»»»ÔÑ8€H!XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î¼î»¼½ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼½»îî¼ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àSeptember€23,€2003€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XH!X»¼½ÔÌò òÔ#†¼½»XXH!#ÔòòSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEóó€v.€òòóóWILLIE€IRA€Ô_ÔPOTEATÔ_Ô,€JR.Ô‡XH!X»¼½Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Sullivan€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€S45,342€€€€€€Phyllis€H.€Miller,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2003„00314„CCA„R3„CD€Ð ¥õ  ÐOctober€17,€Ô_Ô2003Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€Defendant,€Willie€Ira€Ô_ÔPoteatÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€was€indicted€by€the€Sullivan€County€Grand€Jury€for€possessionÐ xÈ  Ðof€more€than€26€grams€of€cocaine€for€resale€and€criminal€conspiracy€to€sell€more€than€26€grams€ofÐ d´ Ðcocaine.€€The€Defendant€filed€a€motion€to€suppress€evidence€taken€during€the€execution€of€a€searchÐ P  Ðwarrant,€which€the€trial€court€denied.€€Thereafter,€the€Defendant€entered€a€plea€of€nolo€contendereÐ <Œ Ðto€the€charges€against€him,€reserving€the€right€to€appeal€a€certified€question€of€law€regarding€the€trialÐ (x Ðcourtððs€ruling€on€the€suppression€issue.€€We€now€address€the€Defendantððs€appeal€based€upon€thisÐ d Ðcertified€question€of€law.Ð P ÐÓìÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼½»àXH!¶#ÔÔ‡XH!X.¼½ÔRobert€W.€Ô_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€€òòDavid€H.€Wellesóó€andÐ ° ÐòòJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€JJ.óó,€joinedÔ#†¼½»XXH!Ê#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ôòòóó.Ð œì ÐÌWilliam€A.€Kennedy,€Ô_ÔBlountvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Willie€Ira€Ô_ÔPoteatÔ_Ô,€Jr.Ð tÄ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€Braden€H.Ð L œ ÐÔ_ÔBoucekÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€H.€Greeley€Wells,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€J.€LewisÐ 8!ˆ  ÐCombs,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð $"t! ÐÓ›ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼½»XXH! #ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½ÔÐ ü#L# ÐÓ  Óà@˜˜&ìàò òI.€€FactsˆÐ è$8 $ ÐÌó óà  àThe€parties€stipulated€to€the€facts€that€occurred€on€the€day€the€search€warrant€in€this€case€wasÐ À&"& Ðexecuted,€and€the€following€facts€are€taken€from€that€stipulation.€€The€Detective€executing€the€searchÐ ¬'ü"' Ðwarrant,€Bryan€Bishop,€entered€a€residence€that€was€ð ðbeing€resided€in€or€occupied€and€possessed€byÐ ˜(è#( ÐRonnie€Nasser€and€a€heavy€set€black€male€known€as€ððÔ_ÔBiggieÔ_Ôðððð€to€search€for€ð ðcertain€property€.€.€.Ð „)Ô$) Ð[including]€[Ô_Ôc]ocaineÔ_Ô,€currency,€lists€of€names,€monies,€amounts€of€drugs€sold€or€fronted,€addressÐ p*À%* Ðor€phone€books€or€lists€of€same,€photographs,€video€recordings,€titles€or€financial€documents,Ð \+¬&+ Ðdocuments€relating€to€the€rental,€purchase,€or€occupancy€of€real€estate€or€services€for€same,€taxÐ H,˜', Ðreturns€.€.€.€.ðð€€The€residence€searched€was€owned€by€Ô_ÔNassarÔ_Ô€and€the€Defendant,€who€was€the€maleÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ôlisted€in€the€search€warrant€as€ð ðBiggieððÔ#†¼½»XXH!µ #ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ô€and€who€paid€many€of€the€bills€at€that€residence€as€ð ðpart€ofÐ ° Ðhis€staying€there.ðð€Ô#†¼½»XXH!Â#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½ÔÐ œì ÐÌà  àUpon€entering€the€residence,€the€Detective€gave€a€copy€of€the€search€warrant€to€Nasser,€a€co„Ð tÄ Ðdefendant,€in€the€presence€of€Joyce€Fleenor,€another€co„defendant.€€The€Defendant€was€not€given€aÐ `° Ðcopy€of€the€search€warrant€nor€was€he€in€the€room€when€Nasser€was€given€a€copy.€€At€the€time€ofÐ L œ Ðthe€execution€of€the€search€warrant,€the€Defendant€was€in€ð ðanother€room.ðð€€Later,€the€SWAT€teamÐ 8 ˆ Ðentered€the€room€in€which€the€Defendant€was€located€and€handcuffed€the€Defendant.€€The€DetectiveÐ $ t Ðread€the€Defendant€Miranda€warnings.€€Ð  ` ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€filed€a€motion€to€suppress€the€evidence€found€pursuant€to€the€search€and€theÐ è 8  Ðstatement€that€he€gave€to€police€subsequent€to€the€search,€claiming€that€the€search€was€illegalÐ Ô$  Ðbecause€police€violated€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€41,€which€governs€the€execution€ofÐ À  Ðsearch€warrants,€and€that€his€statement€was€Ô#†¼½»XXH!p#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ôð ðfruit€of€the€poisonous€tree.ððÔ#†¼½»XXH!ê#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ô€€At€the€hearing€on€theÐ ¬ü  Ðmotion€to€suppress,€the€parties€made€the€aforementioned€stipulation.€€Additionally,€the€DetectiveÐ ˜è  Ðtestified€that,€during€the€search,€the€evidence€collected€was€kept€on€the€ð ðevidence€recovery€log,ðð€aÐ „Ô  Ðcopy€of€which€he€attached€to€the€copy€of€the€search€warrant€left€with€Nasser.€€The€Detective€alsoÐ pÀ Ðtestified€that€he€did€not€give€a€copy€of€the€evidence€recovery€log€to€the€Defendant.€€After€the€hearing,Ð \¬ Ðthe€trial€court€denied€the€Defendantððs€motion,€and€the€Defendant€pled€nolo€contendere€to€the€chargesÐ H˜ Ðagainst€him,€reserving€a€certified€question€of€law€regarding€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€his€motion€toÐ 4„ Ðsuppress.€€Thereafter,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€Defendant€to€two€concurrent€ten€year€sentences.€Ð  p ÐThe€Defendant€now€appeals.Ð  \ ÐÌÌò òÔ‡X#­ XXXH!Ôà@÷÷ìàII.€€Certified€Question€of€Lawó óˆÐ Ð  ÐÌÔ#†XH!X XX#­+#Ôà  àThe€Defendant€contends€that€because€he€was€a€named€person€who€was€to€have€resided,Ð ¨ø Ðoccupied,€and€been€in€possession€of€the€premises€described€in€the€search€warrant,€that€he€wasÐ ”ä Ðrequired€to€get€a€copy€of€the€search€warrant€and€that,€because€he€did€not€receive€a€copy,€the€searchÐ €Ð Ðwas€illegal.Ô‡X#­ XXXH!ÔÔ#†¼eá » XX#­P#ÔÔ‡X#­ X »¼eáÔ€€Because€this€appeal€comes€before€us€as€a€certified€question€of€law,€pursuant€to€RuleÐ l¼ Ð37(b)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure,€we€must€first€determine€whether€the€questionÐ X ¨ Ðpresented€is€dispositive.€€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€37(b)€provides,€in€pertinent€part,Ð D!” Ðthat:Ð 0"€  Ðà8  àAn€appeal€lies€from€any€order€or€judgment€in€a€criminal€proceeding€where€the€lawÐ #l! Ðprovides€for€such€appeal,€and€from€any€judgment€of€conviction€.€.€.€upon€a€plea€ofÐ $X" Ðguilty€[if]€.€.€.€[the]€Defendant€entered€into€a€plea€agreement€under€Rule€11(e)€butÐ ô$D # Ðexplicitly€reserved€with€the€consent€of€the€state€and€of€the€court€the€right€to€appealÐ à%0!$ Ða€certified€question€of€law€that€is€dispositive€of€the€case€and€the€followingÐ Ì&"% Ðrequirements€are€met:и'#&Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à(A)€The€judgment€of€conviction,€or€other€document€to€which€such€judgment€refersÐ )à$( Ðthat€is€filed€before€the€notice€of€appeal,€must€contain€a€statement€of€the€certifiedÐ |*Ì%) Ðquestion€of€law€reserved€by€the€defendant€for€appellate€review;Ðh+¸&*Ð Ð  Ðà8  à(B)€The€question€of€law€must€be€stated€in€the€judgment€or€document€so€as€to€identifyÐ ° Ðclearly€€the€scope€and€limits€of€the€legal€issue€reserved;МìÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(C)€The€judgment€or€document€must€reflect€that€the€certified€question€was€expresslyÐ ˆØ Ðreserved€with€the€consent€of€the€state€and€the€trial€judge;€and€ÐtÄÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(D)€The€judgment€or€document€must€reflect€that€the€defendant,€the€state,€and€the€trialÐ `° Ðjudge€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€certified€question€is€dispositive€of€the€case€.€.€.€.ÐL œÐ Ð  ÐÌTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€37(b)(2);€òòseeóó€òòState€v.€Prestonóó,€759€S.W.2d€647,€650€(Tenn.€1988).€€The€recordÐ $ t Ðevinces€that€all€of€the€requirements€of€Rule€37€are€clearly€met,€and€the€only€issue€about€whichÐ  ` Ðdiscussion€is€necessary€is€whether€the€certified€question€of€law€is€dispositive€of€the€case.€€We€haveÐ ü L  Ðstated€that€a€dispositive€issue€is€one€where€the€appellate€court€ð ðmust€either€affirm€the€judgment€orÐ è 8  Ðreverse€and€dismiss.€€A€question€is€never€dispositive€when€[the€appellate€court]€might€reverse€andÐ Ô$  Ðremand€for€trial€.€.€.€.ðð€€òòState€v.€Wilkesóó,€684€S.W.2d€663,€667€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1984).€Ð À  Ðà  àÌà  àThe€certified€question€of€law,€as€stated€in€the€judgment€of€the€lower€court,€is:€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà8  àThat€the€Trial€Judge€erred€in€denying€defendantððs€motion€to€suppress€evidence€andÐ pÀ Ðstatements€obtained€by€the€Second€Judicial€District€Drug€Task€Force€while€executingÐ \¬ Ða€search€warrant€on€June€23,€2001.€€The€defendant€contends€that€the€evidence€andÐ H˜ Ðstatements€were€obtained€illegally€in€that€the€officers€executing€the€search€warrantÐ 4„ Ðdid€not€comply€with€the€provisions€of€the€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure€41(c)€and€(d).€Ð  p ÐSpecifically,€the€officers€failed€to€serve€or€read€a€copy€of€the€search€warrant€on€theÐ  \ Ðdefendant€and€did€not€leave€the€defendant€a€receipt€for€the€seized€property.ÐøHÐ Ð  ÐÌÔ#†XH!X XX#­!#ÔÔ‡X#­ XXXH!ÔThe€State,€the€Defendant,€and€the€trial€court€all€opined€that€these€issues€are€dispositive€of€the€case,Ð Ð  Ðand€we€agree.€€Accordingly,€we€now€address€whether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€denied€theÐ ¼  ÐDefendantððs€motion€to€suppress.Ð ¨ø ÐÌÌÔ#†XH!X XX#­c+#ÔÔ#†¼½»XXH!c#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ôà@êêìàò òIII.€€Motion€to€Suppressó óˆÐ l¼ ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€Ô‡X#­ XXXH!Ôerred€when€it€denied€his€motion€to€suppressÐ D!” Ðevidence€obtained€from€the€allegedly€illegal€search.€€The€standard€of€review€for€a€trial€courtððsÐ 0"€  Ðfindings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law€in€a€suppression€hearing€was€established€in€òòState€v.€Odomóó,Ð #l! Ð928€S.W.2d€18€(Tenn.€1996).€€This€standard€mandates€that€ð ða€trial€courtððs€findings€of€fact€in€aÐ $X" Ðsuppression€hearing€will€be€upheld€unless€the€evidence€preponderates€otherwise.ðð€€òòId.óó€at€23.€€TheÐ ô$D # Ðprevailing€party€in€the€trial€court€is€ð ðentitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€adducedÐ à%0!$ Ðat€the€suppression€hearing€as€well€as€all€reasonable€and€legitimate€inferences€that€may€be€drawn€fromÐ Ì&"% Ðthat€evidence.ðð€€òòId.óó€€Furthermore,€ð ð[q]uestions€of€credibility€of€the€witnesses,€the€weight€and€valueÐ ¸'#& Ðof€the€evidence,€and€resolution€of€conflicts€in€the€evidence€are€matters€entrusted€to€the€trial€judge€asÐ ¤(ô#' Ðthe€trier€of€fact.ðð€€òòId.óó€€However,€this€Court€reviews€the€trial€courtððs€application€of€the€law€to€the€factsÐ )à$( Ðòòde€novoóó,€without€any€deference€to€the€determinations€of€the€trial€court.€€òòState€v.€Waltonóó,€41€S.W.3dÐ |*Ì%) Ð75,€81€(Tenn.€2001).€€Ô#†XH!X XX#­‹-#ÔÔ#†¼½»XXH!í,#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½ÔThe€question€of€whether€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€41€requresÐ h+¸&* Ðsupression€of€the€evidence€in€this€case€is€a€question€of€law€that€we€review€de€novo€with€noÐ ° Ðpresumption€of€correctness€afforded€to€the€judgment€of€the€court€below.€€òòState€v.€Coffeeóó,€54€S.W.3dÐ œì Ð231,€232€(Tenn.€2001).€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àClearly,€if€the€search€were,€as€the€Defendant€contends,€illegal,€the€trial€court€improperlyÐ `° Ðdenied€the€Defendantððs€motion;€therefore,€we€must€now€decide€whether€the€search€was€conductedÐ L œ Ðin€compliance€with€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure.€€The€Defendant€contends€that€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðofficers€failed€to€comply€with€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€41,€which€governs€theÐ $ t Ðexecution€of€search€warrants,€in€two€ways:€(1)€by€not€giving€him€a€copy€of€the€search€warrant;€andÐ  ` Ð(2)€by€not€giving€him€a€copy€of€the€receipt€of€items€taken€from€the€premises.€€The€Defendant€reliesÐ ü L  Ðon€section€(c)€and€(d)€of€Rule€41€to€support€his€contention.€€Section€(c)€states,€in€pertinent€part:Ð è 8  ÐÌà8  àThe€magistrate€shall€prepare€an€original€and€two€exact€copies€of€the€search€warrant,Ð À  Ðone€of€which€shall€be€kept€by€the€magistrate€as€a€part€of€his€or€her€official€records,Ð ¬ü  Ðand€one€of€which€shall€be€left€with€person€or€persons€on€whom€the€search€warrant€isÐ ˜è  Ðserved.Ð„Ô Ð Ð  ÐÌThe€pertinent€part€of€section€(d)€states:Ð \¬ ÐÌà8  àThe€officer€taking€property€under€the€warrant€shall€give€to€the€person€from€whom€orÐ 4„ Ðfrom€whose€premises€the€property€was€taken€a€copy€of€the€warrant€and€a€receipt€forÐ  p Ðthe€property€taken€or€shall€leave€the€copy€and€receipt€at€a€place€from€which€theÐ  \ Ðproperty€was€taken.ÐøHÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àThe€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€stated€that€the€intent€of€Rule€41€is€to€ð ðsecure€the€citizenÐ Ð  Ðagainst€carelessness€and€abuse€in€the€issuance€and€execution€of€search€warrants.ðð€€òòCoffeeóó,€54€S.W.3dÐ ¼  Ðat€233;€òòseeóóÔ#†¼½»XXH!C3#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ô€òòTalley€v.€Stateóó,€208€Tenn.€275,€278,€345€S.W.2d€867,€869€(1961)€(discussing€TenneseeÐ ¨ø ÐCode€Annotated€section€40„518,€the€statute€from€which€Rule€41€is€derived)òòóóÔ#†¼½»XXH!g<#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ô.€€Ô#†¼½»XXH!h=#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½ÔIt€also€stated€that€theÐ ”ä Ðlanguage€of€the€Rule€is€plain€and€is€mandatory.€€òòCoffeeóó,€54€S.W.3d€at€233;Ô#†¼½»XXH!­=#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ô€òòState€v.€Steeleóó,€894Ð €Ð ÐS.W.2d€318,€319€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994);€Ô#†¼½»XXH!k>#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ôòòseeóó€òòJohnson€v.€Stateóó,€208€Tenn.€620,€622,€348€S.W.2dÐ l¼ Ð295,€296€(1961)€(discussing€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„518)òòóóÔ#†¼½»XXH!?#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ô.Ô#†¼½»XXH!ç?#ÔÔ‡XH!X»¼½Ô€€Further,€this€court€has€heldÐ X ¨ Ðthat€ð ðRule€41(d)€of€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€requires€only€that€the€officer€give€a€copy€of€the€warrant€ððto€theÐ D!” Ðperson€from€whom€or€from€whose€premises€the€property€was€taken.ðð€€The€officer€here€complied€withÐ 0"€  Ðthat€by€giving€a€copy€to€co„defendant€.€.€.€.ðð€€òòState€v.€Woodsóó,€CCA€No.€4,€1988€WL€115987,€at€*1Ð #l! Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€Oct.€4,€1989,€at€Jackson).Ð $X" ÐÌà  àWe€find€that€the€language€of€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€41€is€clear€and€plainlyÐ à%0!$ Ðstates€that€a€copy€of€the€search€warrant€and€receipt€need€not€be€given€to€every€party€named€in€theÐ Ì&"% Ðsearch€warrant,€as€the€Defendant€contends,€but€must€be€given€to€ð ðthe€person€from€whomòòò ò€or€ó óóófromÐ ¸'#& Ðwhose€premises€the€property€was€taken.ðð€€(Emphasis€added).€€The€parties€stipulated€that€theÐ ¤(ô#' ÐDetective€in€the€case€under€submission€gave€a€copy€of€the€warrant€to€Nasser,€a€co„defendant€who€wasÐ )à$( Ðpresent€at€the€time€of€the€search€and€who€was€the€owner€of€the€premises€searched.€€The€trial€courtÐ |*Ì%) Ðfound€that€the€Detective€gave€a€copy€of€the€ð ðreceipt,ðð€or€ð ðevidence€recovery€log,ðð€to€the€co„defendantÐ h+¸&* Ðat€the€conclusion€of€the€search,€and€the€Defendant€presents€no€evidence€to€contradict€this€finding.€Ð ° ÐAccordingly,€we€find€that€the€search€was€conducted€in€compliance€with€Rule€41€in€that€a€copy€of€theÐ œì Ðwarrant€and€receipt€were€left€with€a€person€from€whose€premises€the€property€was€taken.€€Therefore,Ð ˆØ Ðthe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€AFFIRMED.Ð tÄ ÐÌÔ#†¼½»XXH!*@#ÔÔ€XH!X»¼½ÔÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð $ t Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àROBERT€W.€WEDEMEYER,€JUDGE