WPC/? +)XISm8ԗZ"yqJ1Y)fL@!aUj^dGǷrI<~U[hjOAչAM삔U \Ukt`~?7mEE ~ɽӖ%ColI$tx`ɓL# @|Ls]{t;)3zYʛ!/?7]ڸ-w aSfX6\9X@C2'ii=c5V+vq %.U64 0jUNU>@ U*~ U@ z b 4 ] VV^ ~D wN4E m# 0D 0U 05b 0& 0  0 0 0 0 0] 0C1 0t 0K 0 0 0 0! 0Q" 0# 0@# 0$ 0$ 0% 0& 0T' 0( 0( 0) 00`* 0<* 0* 0>+ 0v+ 0`>, 0`, 0`, 0`^- 0`- 0. 08 / 0A/ 020 BE0 0b0 0^1 D32 D-52 0Kb2 0:2 AS2:3 04 0D4 A4 0Y5 0_5 0 K6 0jU7 08 B*C: D/m: 0: D/ < 0O< 06= 0S= 0:[> 0^> 0<><6X9`(Courier New(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial( Z(Times New Roman  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt  Ry$      3    _Sexualpenetrationisdefinedinourcriminalcodeas sexualintercourse,cunnilingus,fellatio,analintercourse,  oranyotherintrusion,howeverslight,ofanypartofapersonsbody...butemissionofsemenisnotrequired.Tenn. t CodeAnn.3913501(7). S Ry$      2    _TheDefendantwasindictedforafifthcountofchildrapearisingfromthisconduct,butthetrialcourt  dismissedthiscountuponmotionbytheDefendantatthecloseoftheStatesproof. L Ry$      4    _WedonotimplythatalloftheaggravatingcircumstanceslistedatTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035  115(b)(5)mustbepresenttosupporttheimpositionofconsecutivesentencing."^-s Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53j1,XT<3|xUHP LaserJet 40500 Ry$      1    _Wewillidentifytheminorvictiminthiscasebyhisinitials.(#$  0  *+ (_2623  ..*G+M (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  - -*D+M (_24   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *A+M (_23  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *>+M (_22   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *;+M (_21   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *8+M (_20  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *5+M (_19   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *2+M (_18    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  * (_1723  Ԁ*GM (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *DM (_15   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *AM (_14  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *>M (_13   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *;M (_12   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *8M (_11  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *5M (_10   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  (2M &_9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  ( &_823  (GM &_7   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  (DM &_6   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  (AM &_5  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  (>M &_4   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  (;M &_3   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  (8M &_2  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  (5M &_1   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  &2M $_    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1      (&H2  (&H3  (&H4 XXX (&H5  (&H6  (|G2y$ !.8dd8         0  20Address8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE d,dl*CODEK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS(|3?$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  42Emphasis^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7h(X7  ?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7&  d dg)1dxd<:zTop of For7j(X7  ?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7g)2dxd0KS.SampleK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  !.8dd8     _   8GXXdd8@ttINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE# #Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsSeptember25,2002 L XGX #XXG##STATEOFTENNESSEEv.JAMESM.POWERSXGX  J @@ AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforCampbellCounty  J @@No.10354E._Shayne_ԀSexton,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200102363CCAR3CD   October30,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     TheDefendant,JamesM.Powers,appealsasofrightfromhisconvictionsbyajuryoffourcounts x  ofrapeofachild,aClassAfelony.Afterasentencinghearing,thetrialcourtimposedasentence d oftwentyyearsoneachofthefourcountsandorderedthatthreeofthesentencesrunconsecutively, P foraneffectivesentenceofsixtyyearstobeservedintheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.The < Defendantarguestwoissuesonappeal:(1)thattheevidencepresentedattrialwasinsufficientto (x supporthisfourconvictionsofchildrape,and(2)thatthetrialcourterredbyimposingconsecutive d sentences.WeaffirmtheDefendantsconvictions.Wereversethetrialcourtsorderthatthe P sentencesbeservedconsecutivelyandremandfortheentryofanorderreflectingconcurrent < sentences. (  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtAffirmedinPart;  ReversedinPart;Remanded     #XG#XGX.DavidH.Welles,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_andAlanE. t Glenn,JJ.,joined. ` CharlesHerman,AssistantPublicDefender,_Jacksboro_,Tennessee,andSteve_McEwen_,Mountain 8!  City,Tennessee,fortheappellant,JamesM.Powers. $"t! PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;ThomasE.Williams,III,AssistantAttorney #L# General;WilliamPaulPhillips,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andMichaelO.Ripley,AssistantDistrict $8 $ AttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. %$!% z @@OO& OPINION #XXG #XGX '"'   #XXG #XGXXGXXXG  TheDefendant,JamesM.Powers,wasconvictedbyajuryoffourcountsofrapeofachild. p*%* Followingasentencinghearing,theDefendantreceivedasentenceoftwentyyearsasaRangeI \+&+ standardoffenderforeachofthefourcounts.Thetrialcourtorderedthatthreeofthesentencesbe H,', servedconsecutively,foraneffectivesentenceofsixtyyears.TheDefendantappealsasofright, 4-(- assertingthattheevidencewasinsufficienttosupporthisfourconvictionsofchildrapeandthatthe  trialcourterredbyorderingthreeofthesentencestobeservedconsecutively.Weaffirmthe  Defendantsconvictions.Wereversethetrialcourtsdeterminationthatthesentencesshouldbe  servedconsecutivelyandremandfortheentryofanorderconsistentwiththisopinion. t   InAugustof1999,elevenyearoldA.M. *#  1      #XGXXXG #XGXXXG,thevictiminthiscase,residedinasmallmobile L  homecommunityinCampbellCounty,Tennessee,withhismother,grandmother,aunt,andbrother. 8  TheDefendantalsolivedinthecommunityatthattime,veryclosetothehomeinwhichA.M.and $ t hisfamilylived.TheDefendantandA.M.smotherarefirstcousins.A.M.oftenplayedwithhis  ` cousins,whowereclosetohisageandwholivedintheDefendantsmobilehome.Itwasnot  L  unusualforA.M.tospendtimeintheDefendantsresidence,playingwithhiscousinsandwatching  8  movies.A.M.testifiedthatononeoccasion,hewasintheDefendantsresidence,wrestlingwith $  hiscousinsandtheDefendant.Althoughhiscousinseventuallylefttodootherthings,A.M.didnot   noticetheirdeparture,andhecontinuedtowrestlewiththeDefendant.Duringthecourseofthe   wrestling,theDefendanttouchedA.M.spenis.A.M.testifiedthattheDefendant touchedmedown   thereandthenItoldhimtostopandputmyfootinhisstomachandIpushedandheletgo.A.M.   didnottellhismotheraboutthisepisodebecausehethoughthe didsomethingwrongandwas p  scaredthathewouldbetakenawayfromhismother. T *#  2      ׀ \   A.M.testifiedthat aboutaweeklater,theDefendanttouchedhimagain.Hewasatthe 4 Defendantsresidencewithhiscousinswatchingamovie.Thecousinsleftatsomepoint,andA.M.  p wasalonewiththeDefendantonthecouchwatchingthemovie.Whiletheywerewatchingthe  \ movie,theDefendant scootedoverfromtheoppositesideofthecouch.A.M.then scootedover H justalittlebitmoreawayfromtheDefendant.TheDefendantagainmovedclosertoA.M.The 4 DefendantthenputhishandsdownA.M.spants,tookoutA.M.spenis,andperformedfellatioon   him.A.M.testifiedthat,withoutsayinganything,theDefendant puthishandsdownmypantsand   pulleditout.Hetookitoutofmypantsandthenheputhismouthonme.A.M. [_t]old_Ԁhimto  stop,andwhenA.M. gotupandleft,theDefendantstoppedtouchinghim.A.M.thenwenthome,  buthedidnottellanyoneaboutwhathadhappenedbecausehe wasscared.    A.M.testifiedthat twoorthreedayslater,A.M.wasplanningtogotoafriendshousewith X  oneofhisrelativesnamedScottie.TheDefendantwasgoingtogivethemaride.However,Scottie D! ultimatelydidnotgoalong.TheDefendantproceededtotakeA.M.tothefriendshouse.Instead 0"  ofgoingdirectlytothehouse,theDefendanttookA.M.toadeadendroad.A.M.testifiedthathe #l! askedtheDefendantwhytheywerenotgoingtothehouse,buthecouldnotrememberwhatthe $X" Defendantsaid.Atthedeadend,theDefendanttookA.M.spenisoutofhispantsandagain $D #  performedoralsexonA.M.WhenaskedifhesaidanythingtotheDefendant,A.M.replied, Stop. %0!$ _Ididntsaynothingelse.Ididntthinkofanything.Icouldntthinkofanythingtosaytohimtoget  himtostop.     Afewdayslater,A.M.wenttotheDefendantsresidencetoplayandwatchmovieswithhis t cousins.OtherpeoplewereinthehomewhenA.M.arrived.However,A.M.wasleftalonewiththe ` Defendantwhentheotherswenttobed.Whiletheywereonthecouchinthelivingroomwatching L  amovie,theDefendantagainpulledA.M.spenisfromhispantsandperformedfellatioonhim. 8  A.M.didnottellanyonewhathappenedbecausehe wasafraid[hewould]gettookfrom[his] $ t mother.  `   ThelastincidentoccurredwhenA.M.againwenttotheDefendantsresidencetoplaywith  8  hiscousins.Heandhiscousinswereintheresidenceplayingwithtrucks,andhiscousinswent $  outsidetoplay.A.M.remainedinthehomeplayingwiththetrucks.Whiletheywerealone,the   DefendantagaintookA.M.spenisfromhispantsandperformedoralsexonhim.     Approximatelyaweekafterthelastoccurrence,A.M.toldhismotheraboutwhatthe   Defendanthadbeendoingtohim.Thetwoofthemwentforadrive,andsheaskedhimwhathad p happenedwiththeDefendant.A.M.smothertestifiedthatshefirstbecameconcernedaboutthe \ DefendantandhersonwhenshelearnedthattheDefendantwasbuyingtobaccoforherson.A.M. H toldherthathehadbeendoingyardworkfortheDefendant,andalltheboysintheareadipped 4 snuff.Sometimelater,theDefendantcametothemobilehomewhereA.M.smotherlivedand  p askedtoseeher.ShetestifiedthattheDefendanttoldher, Idontlikeyoucallingmeachild  \ molester.ShewassurprisedbecauseshehadneveraccusedtheDefendantofbeingachild H molester.TheDefendantsaidthatA.M.hadtoldhimabouthismotheraskingaboutthesnuff. 4 A.M.smotherrepliedthatshehadjustbeencuriousabouttheworkthatA.M.hadbeendoing.The   Defendantthensaid, Well,Iaintnochildmolester.ShetestifiedthataftertheDefendantcalmed   down,hetoldher, Igottotellyouthetruth,Ididyouknow...meand[A.M.],wehaddid  something.Sheaskedhimwhattheyhaddone,andtestifiedthatheresponded thathehadsucked  mysonsdick.ShethentookA.M.foradriveandaskedhimaboutit,andheconfirmedwhatthe  Defendanttoldherandthatithadallstartedwiththeincidentwhichoccurredwhilewrestling. l   TheDefendantarguesthattheevidenceisinsufficienttosupportfourconvictionsforchild D! rape.TennesseeRuleofAppellateProcedure13(e)prescribesthat [f]indingsofguiltincriminal 0"  actionswhetherbythetrialcourtorjuryshallbesetasideiftheevidenceisinsufficienttosupport #l! thefindingsbythetrieroffactofguiltbeyondareasonabledoubt.Evidenceissufficientif,after $X" reviewingtheevidenceinthelightmostfavorabletotheprosecution,anyrationaltrieroffactcould $D # havefoundtheessentialelementsofthecrimebeyondareasonabledoubt.SeeJacksonv.Virginia, %0!$ 443U.S.307,319(1979);Statev.Smith,24S.W.3d274,278(Tenn.2000).Inaddition,because &"% convictionbyatrieroffactdestroysthepresumptionofinnocenceandimposesapresumptionof '#& guilt,aconvictedcriminaldefendantbearstheburdenofshowingthattheevidencewasinsufficient. (#' SeeMcBeev.State,372S.W.2d173,176(Tenn.1963);seealsoStatev.Buggs,995S.W.2d102, )$( 10506(Tenn.1999);Statev.Evans,838S.W.2d185,191(Tenn.1992);Statev.Tuggle,639 |*%) S.W.2d913,914(Tenn.1982). h+&* Ї  Initsreviewoftheevidence,anappellatecourtmustaffordtheState thestrongestlegitimate  viewoftheevidenceaswellasallreasonableandlegitimateinferencesthatmaybedrawn  therefrom.Tuggle,639S.W.2dat914;seealsoSmith,24S.W.3dat279.Thecourtmaynot re  weighorreevaluatetheevidenceintherecordbelow.Evans,838S.W.2dat191;seealsoBuggs, t 995S.W.2dat105.Likewise,shouldthereviewingcourtfindparticularconflictsinthetrial ` testimony,thecourtmustresolvetheminfavorofthejuryverdictortrialcourtjudgment.See L  Tuggle,639S.W.2dat914.Allquestionsinvolvingthecredibilityofwitnesses,theweightand 8  valuetobegiventheevidence,andallfactualissuesareresolvedbythetrieroffact,nottheappellate $ t courts.SeeStatev.Morris,24S.W.3d788,795(Tenn.2000);Statev.Pappas,754S.W.2d620,  ` 623(Tenn.Crim.App.1987).#XGXXXGO#XGXXXGԀ  L    S'w $  Rapeofachildistheunlawfulsexualpenetrationofavictimbythedefendantorthe 'w  defendantbyavictim,ifsuchvictimislessthanthirteen(13)yearsofage.Tenn.CodeAnn.39 c  13522(a).  *#  3      SӀTheDefendantarguesthattheevidenceisinsufficienttoprovethathehadanysexual O  contactwiththevictim.Wedisagree.A.M.testifiedtoeachofthefourincidentswhichgaverise ;  totheDefendantsconvictions.A.M.testifiedthateachtime,theDefendanttookA.M.spenisfrom ' hispantsandperformedfellatioonhim.A.M.smothertestifiedthattheDefendantcametoher  homeandadmittedtoherthathehadperformedoralsexonherelevenyearoldson.    TheDefendanturgesustofindthetestimonyofA.M.andhismothernotcredible.Hestates -} inhisbriefthat itseemsirrationalandincrediblethat[thevictim]wouldcontinuallygotothetrailer i aftertheabuseinitiallystartedinAugustof1999.TheDefendantfurtherstatesinhisbrief, Even U moreincrediblewas[A.M.smothers]testimonyconcerningappellantsallegedstatementtoher A thathehadsucked[A.M.s]penis.Theappellantadamantlydeniedtheaccusations,anditdoesnot - standtoreasonthatafterconfronting[her]abouttheallegations,hewouldthentellthechildsown  motherthathehadcommittedsuchanact.    ThecruxofDefendantschallengetothesufficiencyoftheevidenceisthatthetestimonyof 3 theStateswitnesseswasnotcredibleandthereforecannotsupporttheconvictions.Suchan  o argumentmustfail.Wereiteratethatallquestionsinvolvingthecredibilityofwitnessesaretobe  ![ resolvedbythetrieroffact,nottheappellatecourts.SeeStatev.Morris,24S.W.3d788,795(Tenn. !G 2000).Furthermore,evidenceissufficientif,inthelightmostfavorabletotheprosecution,any "3 rationaltrieroffactcouldhavefoundtheessentialelementsofthecrimebeyondareasonabledoubt. #  SeeJacksonv.Virginia,443U.S.307,319(1979);Statev.Smith,24S.W.3d274,278(Tenn.2000). $ ! BasedonthetestimonyofA.M.andhismother,arationaljurorclearlycouldhavefoundbeyonda % "  reasonabledoubtthattheDefendantcommitted,onfourseparateanddistinctoccasions,anunlawful &!# sexualpenetrationofthevictim,A.M.,whenA.M.waslessthanthirteenyearsold.Therefore,this  issueiswithoutmerit.     TheDefendantssecondissueonappealiswhetherthetrialcourterredbyorderingthreeof j thesentencesforchildrapetobeservedconsecutively.Whenanaccusedchallengesthelength,  V range,ormannerofserviceofasentence,thisCourthasadutytoconductadenovoreviewofthe  B sentencewithapresumptionthatthedeterminationsmadebythetrialcourtarecorrect.SeeTenn.  . CodeAnn.4035401(d).Thispresumptionis conditionedupontheaffirmativeshowinginthe   recordthatthetrialcourtconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsand   circumstances.Statev.Ashby,823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).      Whenconductingadenovoreviewofasentence,thisCourtmustconsider:(a)theevidence,  p  ifany,receivedatthetrialandsentencinghearing;(b)thepresentencereport;(c)theprinciplesof  \  sentencingandargumentsastosentencingalternatives;(d)thenatureandcharacteristicsofthe H  criminalconductinvolved;(e)anystatutorymitigatingorenhancementfactors;(f)anystatement 4 madebythedefendantregardingsentencing;and(g)thepotentialorlackofpotentialfor   rehabilitationortreatment.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035102,103,210#XGXXXG=7#XGXXXG;Statev.Brewer,875   S.W.2d298,302(Tenn.Crim.App.1993);Statev.Thomas,755S.W.2d838,844(Tenn.Crim.  App.1988).    Ifourreviewreflectsthatthetrialcourtfollowedthestatutorysentencingprocedure,thatthe b courtimposedalawfulsentenceafterhavinggivendueconsiderationandproperweighttothe N factorsandprinciplessetoutunderthesentencinglaw,andthatthetrialcourtsfindingsoffactare : adequatelysupportedbytherecord,thenwemaynotmodifythesentenceevenifwewouldhave & preferredadifferentresult.SeeStatev.Pike,978S.W.2d904,92627(Tenn.1998);Statev.  Fletcher,805S.W.2d785,789(Tenn.Crim.App.1991).#XGXXXGI#XGXXXG    #XGXXXGbM#XGXXXG  Atthesentencinghearing,thetrialcourtimposedconsecutivesentencespursuanttothe , | following: !h 0  8` (#(#Thecourtmayordersentencestorunconsecutivelyifthecourtfindsbya W" preponderanceoftheevidencethat:C#` `  0  8` (#(#...$` `  0  8` (#(#Thedefendantisconvictedoftwo(2)ormorestatutoryoffensesinvolving %!  sexualabuseofaminorwithconsiderationoftheaggravating &!! circumstancesarisingfromtherelationshipbetweenthedefendantand '"" victimorvictims,thetimespanofdefendantsundetectedsexualactivity, (## thenatureandscopeofthesexualactsandtheextentoftheresidual, q)$$ physicalandmentaldamagetothevictimorvictims.]*%%` `   +&&  S#XGXXXGM#  Tenn.CodeAnn.4035115(b)(5).InorderingthreeoftheDefendantsfoursentencestorun  consecutively,thetrialjudgeconsideredthementaldamageinflicteduponA.M.bytheDefendant.  A.M.smothertestifiedthatA.M.sgradeshavesufferedasaresultoftherapes.ShedescribedA.M.  as depressedandafraid.A.M.seesatherapistonceaweekandtakesPaxilforhisdepression. t Furthermore,hismothertestifiedthatA.M.stillhasbaddreamsand throwsup.Thetrialjudge ` stated, Itsverycleartomethatthischildisinforalong,longperiodofrehabilitationbecauseof L  [theDefendants]acts.ThetrialcourtalsoconsideredtherelationshipbetweentheDefendantand 8  thevictimwhendecidingtoorderconsecutivesentences.Thecourtcharacterizedtherelationship $ t as neighborly,butwenotethattheDefendantisactuallyA.M.sfirstcousin,onceremoved.The  ` trialcourtgaveconsiderationto thewaythatthedefendantcarriedouttheseparticularcrimes,by  L  endearinghimselftothefamilyandholdinghimselfouttobeclosetothe[victim]andtothefamily.  8  ThecourtthenorderedthatthreeoftheDefendantsfourtwentyyearsentencesrunconsecutively. $    Obviously,ourlawrecognizesthatrapeofachildisamostseriousoffense.Ourlegislature   hasclassifiedrapeofachildasaClassAfelony.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3913522(b).Achild   rapistmustservetheentiresentence"onehundredpercent"undiminishedbyanysentence   reductioncredits.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3913523(b).EventhoughtheconductoftheDefendant p wasreprehensible,andwhilenotdiscountingtheseriousnessofcrimesofthisnature,webelievethe \ circumstancesinthiscasemilitateagainsttheapplicationofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection40 H 35115(b)(5).Therewasnosignificanttimespanofundetectedsexualactivityandthenatureofthe 4 criminalconductwasnotaggravatedbeyondwhatisinherentinsexcrimescommittedagainst  p children.  *#  4      ׀WenotethatthisCourthasheldthatconsecutivesentencingwasunsupportedbythe  \ evidencewheretheillegalsexualconductoccurredoveratwomonthperiodandthedefendantwas H thevictimsfather.SeeStatev.Hayes,899S.W.2d175,187(Tenn.Crim.App.1995). 4   WehavenotdisregardedthetraumasufferedbyA.M.,butgivenallthecircumstances   presentedinthiscase,concurrentsentencesoftwentyyearsforthechildrapeconvictionsare  appropriateinrelationtotheseverityoftheoffensesandaretheleastseveremeasuresnecessaryto  deterthedefendantsfuturecriminalconduct,toprotectsociety,andtodeterotherswhoaresimilarly  situatedandmaybelikelytocommitsimilaroffenses.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035102and103. l   Therefore,wemodifythesentencestoreflectthattheybeservedconcurrently,andremand D! tothetrialcourtforentryofanorderconsistentwiththisopinion.Inallotherrespects,thejudgment 0"  isaffirmed. #l!    `     h     ___________________________________ &"%    `     h     DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE