WPC  +8}ኌ;y*ŐS'RޒaP /Ic.XYdv$ߐ?e'`cE6 k|pR]Eq%/BoԊwCd M(rhHh:ma|!('d(}ŵELGBiٯۏ|Q-Fz /y̖mZ8pC0"=+:)B[wϊS)uI$9r Zw6v h.p*`hWr?VW_gp?g^d;WñBtQ |;1y:Yii-h Zv[ @*AV) ` dE< ` A߈    @ No.% # %#M200302953CCAR3PCFiledOctober11,_2004_Ԉ   AV) ` dE<x` A y   ThePetitioner,JohnnyProffitt,appealsthetrialcourt'sdismissalofhispetitionforpost Z  convictionrelief.TheStatehasfiledamotionrequestingthatthisCourtaffirmthetrialcourt's C denialofreliefpursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.ThePetitioner ,| cannotcollaterallyattackhisprobationrevocationorder#X3dXXX:#XXXX3d.Moreover,thepetitionerfiled#X3dXXX3#XXXX3dԀhis e petitionoutsidethestatuteoflimitations#X3dXXX#XXXX3d.Accordingly,theState'smotionisgranted,andthe N judgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. 7  Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtAffirmedPursuanttoRule20,Rulesof   theCourtofCriminalAppeals     ROBERTW._WEDEMEYER_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDAVIDH.WELLES, v J.,andJERRYL.SMITH,J.,joined. _ JohnnyProffitt,prose. 1 PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;JohnH.Bledsoe,AssistantAttorneyGeneral,for  S theappellee,StateofTennessee.  <  g @! MEMORANDUMOPINION  ""   #X3dXXX #XXXX3d@* #X3dXXX #ԈXXXX3d  Thismatterisbeforethecourtuponmotionoftheappellee,theStateofTennessee,toaffirm $$ thejudgmentinthiscasepursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.The z% % petitionerisappealingthetrialcourt'sdismissalofhispetitionforpostconvictionrelief,following c&!& therevocationofhisprobation. L'"'   OnJuly15,1991,thepetitionerpledguiltytothirddegreeburglary,theftover$10,000,and )n$) arsonofastructure.Petitionerwassentencedtotwoyearsat35%ontheburglaryconviction,six *W%* yearsat35%onthetheftconviction,andsixyearsat35%onthearsonconviction.Thetwoyear *@&+ sentenceforburglarywasconsecutivetothetwosixyearsentences,whichranconcurrently,fora +)', totaleffectivesentenceofeightyears.Thepetitionerwasorderedtoserveoneyearinconfinement ,(- priortobeingplacedonsupervisedprobation.OnApril30,2003,thetrialcourtrevokedpetitioners -(. _probationastohistheftandarsonconvictionsandorderedpetitionertoservetheconcurrent  sentencesofsixyearsat35%,withcreditfortheyearpetitionerservedpriortoprobationandthe  timehehadservedfollowingtheprobationrevocation.Petitionerfiledapetitionforpostconviction  reliefonSeptember11,2003,attemptingtochallengethetrialcourtsorderrevokinghisprobation. k ThetrialcourtdismissedthepetitionforpostconvictionreliefonNovember10,2003,findingthat T thepetitionerhadfailedtoassertacolorableclaimforpostconvictionrelief. =  #X3dXXX #XXXX3d  Thepetitionerfiledhispostconvictionpetitioninanattempttochallengethetrialcourts  _ orderrevokinghisprobationastohis1991theftandarsonconvictions.Thepetitionerisnotentitled  H topostconvictionreliefunderTenn.CodeAnn.#X3dXXX#XXXX3d4030101etseq.,fromaprobationrevocation  1  order,asthiscourtheldin#X3dXXX#XXXX3dYoungv.State,101S.W.3d430(Tenn.Crim.App.2002)#X3dXXX#XXXX3d.Thiscourt    specificallyheldinYoungthat theTennesseePostConvictionProcedureActdoesnotpermitthe   filingofapetitionunderitsprovisionstoattackcollaterallythevalidityofaproceedingtorevoke   thesuspensionofsentenceand/orprobation.AstheYoungCourtexplained,#X3dXXX##XXXX3danorderrevoking   suspensionofsentenceandprobationdoesnotimposeanewsentencesubjecttocollateralattack n  forpostconvictionpurposes#X3dXXX#XXXX3d.Thus,thetrialcourtproperlydismissedthepetitionerspost W  convictionpetition.Further,totheextentthepetitionerwasattemptingtochallengehisunderlying @ convictionandsentence,thestatuteoflimitationshadlongsinceexpired,andthetrialcourtsorder )y revokingprobationdidnottollorcausethestatuteoflimitationstobegintorunanew.See#X3dXXX#XXXX3dYoung b v.State,101S.W.3dat43233#X3dXXX#XXXX3d. K #X3dXXXL#XXXX3d  Accordingly,thestate'smotiontoaffirmisherebygranted.Thejudgmentisaffirmedin  accordancewithRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.Becausetheappellantisindigent,  costsaretaxedtotheState.     `     h        `     h     ____________________________________ e    `     h     ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE N    `     h     #X3dXXX#