ÿWPCÀ ÔHáÍiYhDˆg€í¥‹Rÿ)ŸsÇÔúi”€„‘ŽØÿ‡vK&¢þ|· 0‘Ôvï@œçqÒQ3Ñ«˜Èˆuãl¾ØKµ ëˆÝM€îŒÇèÏOþG’Øå3iŽ)3ú®ºñºXMŽùlVýÝm°âhÂvwÙ¥ü­€È}|s@~3ã)ðbèÉQq+üqŠÉˆhˆVØŸâ“Gã­‰jµñ©FüZ©K¬%&Øq2jQç{íDøö°hŠaB•µŠØš={ñ!%=¦cè@0%d·r?}™|øUúÿª_û“5\ñÆ`m›B-MCœÙQ.’ýÛé²hàb"1Þ-‚ØèÁCáÓ<*²‚íÚƒ^_ün» ‹¾°Š>4u‚RAK]ªëŽxu+Bmƒp£Á!b-÷ív¼­ÝkÁ黥-¦ c2‡âK²M´ŒbŸJ'D¢Gxljqêöæ0UÒþ“U·íÒôÉAß§}ʼn/3úG o¦hšæ\‚fjªÄOÎQŽKî.¢èàYŒ“?Y@çˆÂÿQHÛ9v»R–X…Š MÈDCEÞÐN h#ŸÑü!Ï”“vD1¢4ÔÖc c?!ûä[f‡|§ìžÃgˆ1Þb#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ UN· w 4 z Ò— i x mz ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë ë N±±±E³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³bµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµ 0ë½½½½ B¨¨ 0¤Å D3i D-œ 0KÉÉ ASÆg 0¤- 0DÑ A«˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»›+â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularyG*¢Ø+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2±¿$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€E%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôç ò»»Ô d(|3v$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€E%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3v$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€E%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€E%»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼E%»»»ÔÑ8€éXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îNdE%ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼E%»îîNd #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€June€27,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XéX»¼E%ÔÌò òÔ#†¼E%»XXé#ÔòòSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEóó€v.€òòóóDOYLE€W.€Ô_ÔPUGHÔ_ÔÔ‡XéX»¼E%Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Cumberland€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€5068€€€€€€Ô_ÔLillieÔ_Ô€Ann€Sells,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2000„02488„CCA„R3„CD€Ð ¥õ  ÐAugust€15,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓPursuant€to€a€plea€agreement,€the€Defendant€pled€guilty€to€two€misdemeanor€counts€of€fraudulentÐ xÈ  Ðuse€of€a€credit€card€and€was€placed€on€judicial€diversion.€€Thereafter,€a€warrant€was€filed€in€whichÐ d´ Ðthe€Defendantððs€probation€officer€alleged€that€the€Defendant€failed€to€report€as€directed€and€failedÐ P  Ðto€pay€fines€and€court€costs€in€a€timely€manner.€€After€a€hearing€on€the€warrant,€the€trial€courtÐ <Œ Ðrevoked€the€Defendantððs€judicial€diversion€and€entered€a€judgment€against€the€Defendant,€requiringÐ (x Ðhim€to€serve€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€on€each€count,€with€the€sentences€to€runÐ d Ðconcurrently.€€The€Defendant€now€appeals,€arguing€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€byÐ P Ðsentencing€the€Defendant€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€incarceration€rather€than€elevenÐ ì< Ðmonths€and€twenty„nine€days€probation.€€Finding€no€error,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð Ø( ÐÓÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ ° ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼E%»àXé³#ÔÔ‡XéX.¼E%ÔRobert€W.€Ô_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ô,€J.,Ð ˆØ Ðóójoined,€and€òòJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€J.óó,€concurred€in€the€result.Ð tÄ ÐÌCynthia€S.€Lyons,€Ô_ÔCookevilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Doyle€W.€Ô_ÔPughÔ_Ô.Ð L œ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Elizabeth€T.€Ryan,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð $"t! ÐWilliam€Edward€Gibson,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Anthony€J.€Ô_ÔCraigheadÔ_Ô,€Assistant€DistrictÐ #`" ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ü#L# ÐÓµ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONÐ Ô%$!% ÐÌÓ  Óà  àó óThe€Defendant,€Doyle€W.€Ô_ÔPughÔ_Ô,€was€indicted€by€the€Cumberland€County€Grand€Jury€forÐ ¬'ü"' Ðseventeen€misdemeanor€counts€of€fraudulent€use€of€a€credit€card.€€Pursuant€to€a€plea€agreement,€onÐ ˜(è#( ÐOctober€30,€1998,€the€Defendant€pled€guilty€to€two€of€the€seventeen€misdemeanor€counts€ofÐ „)Ô$) Ðfraudulent€use€of€a€credit€card€(Class€A€misdemeanors),€and€the€remaining€counts€were€dismissed.€Ð p*À%* ÐThe€trial€court€placed€the€Defendant€on€judicial€diversion€for€a€period€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„Ð \+¬&+ Ðnine€days,€and€ordered€restitution€in€the€amount€of€$5,217.00€to€be€paid€to€Trans€Financial€Bank€inÐ H,˜', ÐÔ_ÔCrossvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee.€€On€October€8,€1999,€prior€to€the€expiration€of€the€original€term€of€judicialÐ 4-„(-ý€ ÐÔ_Ôdiversion,€an€agreed€order€was€entered,€in€which€the€Defendantððs€period€of€probation€was€extendedÐ ° Ðan€additional€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days.€€According€to€the€order,€at€that€time€theÐ œì ÐDefendant€still€owed€$3,090.00€in€ð ðcourt€cost€and€fines.ðð€€Presumably€this€amount€also€included€theÐ ˆØ Ðrestitution€to€Trans€Financial€Bank€that€was€ordered€as€part€of€the€original€plea€agreement.Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àOn€February€29,€2000,€the€Defendantððs€probation€officer,€J.€L.€Colton,€obtained€a€violationÐ L œ Ðof€probation€warrant€against€the€Defendant,€in€which€Colton€alleged€that€the€Defendant€had€failedÐ 8 ˆ Ðto€properly€report€for€the€month€of€February,€2000€and€that€he€had€failed€to€pay€fines€and€court€costsÐ $ t Ðin€a€timely€manner.€€The€warrant€alleged€that€the€Defendant€owed€a€balance€of€$2,090.50€as€of€theÐ  ` Ðdate€of€the€warrant.€€Again,€we€presume€that€restitution€was€included€in€the€balance.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àOn€September€28,€2000,€the€trial€court€conducted€a€hearing€on€the€allegations€in€the€violationÐ Ô$  Ðof€probation€warrant€that€had€been€filed€against€the€Defendant.€€The€trial€court€found€that€theÐ À  ÐDefendant€had€failed€to€report€as€directed€and€terminated€the€judicial€diversion.€€The€trial€courtÐ ¬ü  Ðentered€judgments€against€the€Defendant,€sentencing€him€to€serve€eleven€months€and€twenty„nineÐ ˜è  Ðdays€on€each€of€the€two€counts,€with€the€sentences€to€run€concurrently.€€The€judgments€specify€aÐ „Ô  Ðthirty€percent€ð ðminimum€service€prior€to€eligibility€for€work€release,€furlough,€trustee€status€andÐ pÀ Ðrehabilitative€programs€(misdemeanor).ððÐ \¬ Ðà  àÌà@òò&ìàò òòòANALYSISóóó óˆÐ 4„ ÐÌà  àOn€appeal,€the€Defendant€concedes€that€the€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€revokingÐ  \ Ðthe€Defendantððs€judicial€diversion,€but€argues€that€the€trial€court€did€abuse€its€discretion€byÐ øH Ðsentencing€the€Defendant€to€a€sentence€involving€incarceration.Ð ä4 ÐÔ#†¼E%»XXéä #ÔÔ‡XéX»¼E%Ôà  àÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„313(a)(1)(A)€provides€that€if€a€person€is€found€guilty€orÐ ¼  Ðpleads€guilty€to€certain€offenses,€the€trial€court€may,€without€the€entry€of€a€judgment€of€guilty€andÐ ¨ø Ðwith€the€consent€of€such€person,€defer€further€proceedings.€€The€Defendant€is€then€placed€onÐ ”ä Ðprobation€with€reasonable€conditions€for€not€less€than€the€period€of€the€maximum€sentence€for€theÐ €Ð Ðmisdemeanor€offense€with€which€the€Defendant€is€charged,€or€not€more€than€the€maximum€sentenceÐ l¼ Ðfor€the€felony€offense€with€which€the€Defendant€is€charged.€€òòIdóó.òòóó€€Upon€violation€of€probation,€theÐ X ¨ Ðcourt€may€then€enter€an€adjudication€of€guilt€and€proceed€to€sentencing.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð D!” Ð313(a)(2).€€The€standard€of€review€for€the€termination€of€judicial€diversion€is€abuse€of€discretion.€Ð 0"€  ÐòòState€v.€Johnsonóó,€15€S.W.3d€515,€517„18€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999).Ô#†¼E%»XXé#ÔÔ‡XéX»¼E%ÔÐ #l! ÐÌà  àIn€misdemeanor€sentences,€a€separate€sentencing€hearing€is€not€mandatory,€but€the€trial€courtÐ ô$D # Ðis€required€to€allow€the€parties€a€reasonable€opportunity€to€be€heard€on€the€question€of€the€length€ofÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€sentence€and€the€manner€in€which€it€is€to€be€served.€€òòIdóó.€ðð€40„35„302(a).€€In€this€case,€the€trialÐ Ì&"% Ðcourt€did€so.€€Further,€the€sentence€imposed€must€be€specific€and€consistent€with€the€purposes€andÐ ¸'#& Ðprinciples€of€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989.€€òòIdóó.€ðð€40„35„302(b).€€A€percentage€of€notÐ ¤(ô#' Ðgreater€than€seventy„five€percent€of€the€sentence€should€be€fixed€for€service,€after€which€theÐ )à$( ÐDefendant€becomes€eligible€for€ð ðwork€release,€furlough,€trusty€status€and€related€rehabilitativeÐ |*Ì%) Ðprograms.ðð€€òòIdóó.€ðð€40„35„302(d).€€We€note€that€the€plea€agreement€entered€into€by€the€Defendant€whenÐ h+¸&* Ðhe€received€judicial€diversion€included€a€provision€indicating€ð ðcounty€jail€program€eligibility:€30%.ðð€Ð ° ÐThis€would€seem€to€indicate€that€in€the€event€that€the€Defendant€was€ordered€to€serve€his€sentences,Ð œì Ðhis€county€jail€program€eligibility€was€to€be€set€at€thirty€percent,€which€in€fact€is€exactly€what€isÐ ˆØ Ðindicated€in€the€judgment€forms€eventually€entered€by€the€trial€court.Ô#†¼E%»XXéu#ÔÔ‡XéX»¼E%ÔÐ tÄ ÐÌà  àThe€misdemeanant,€unlike€the€felon,€is€not€entitled€to€the€presumption€of€a€minimumÐ L œ Ðsentence.€€òòState€v.€Creasyóó,€885€S.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€However,€in€determiningÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€percentage€of€the€sentence€to€be€served€in€actual€confinement,€the€court€must€considerÐ $ t Ðenhancement€and€mitigating€factors€as€well€as€the€purposes€and€principles€of€the€CriminalÐ  ` ÐSentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989,€and€the€court€should€not€impose€such€percentages€arbitrarily.€€Tenn.Ð ü L  ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„302(d).Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àIn€this€case,€it€is€obvious€that€a€major€consideration€weighing€against€alternative€sentencingÐ À  Ðfor€the€Defendant€is€that€measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€had€recently€been€appliedÐ ¬ü  Ðunsuccessfully€to€the€Defendant.€€òòIdóó.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(C).€€The€Defendant€was€granted€judicialÐ ˜è  Ðdiversion€and€placed€on€probation.€€Although€the€original€probation€order€required€payment€of€fines,Ð „Ô  Ðcost€and€restitution€within€the€original€eleven€month€and€twenty„nine€day€period€of€probation,€theÐ pÀ ÐDefendant€failed€to€meet€this€requirement.€€The€court€extended€the€period€of€probation€for€anÐ \¬ Ðadditional€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days.€€At€the€time€that€the€warrant€was€issued€against€theÐ H˜ ÐDefendant€for€violation€of€probation€and€at€the€time€of€the€hearing€on€said€warrant,€the€DefendantÐ 4„ Ðstill€had€failed€to€pay€the€balance€of€his€fine,€court€costs€and€restitution.€€Ð  p ÐÌà  àIn€this€case,€due€to€the€Defendantððs€health€problems€that€prevented€him€from€working,€theÐ øH Ðtrial€court€took€no€action€against€him€based€upon€his€failure€to€pay.€€The€trial€court€did€find€that€thereÐ ä4 Ðwas€no€excuse€for€his€failure€to€report€as€directed.€€Because€reporting€as€directed€is€a€rule€ofÐ Ð  Ðprobation€with€which€the€Defendant€did€not€comply,€it€is€obvious€that€probation€had€recently€beenÐ ¼  Ðapplied€unsuccessfully€to€the€Defendant.€€We€conclude€that€the€Defendantððs€sentence€was€notÐ ¨ø Ðexcessive€and€that€it€was€consistent€with€the€purposes€and€principles€of€the€1989€CriminalÐ ”ä ÐSentencing€Reform€Act.€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àFinally,€the€Defendant€argues€on€appeal€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€him€to€elevenÐ X ¨ Ðmonths€and€twenty„nine€days€incarceration€because€ð ðthis€was€not€the€agreed€upon€sentence€at€theÐ D!” Ðtime€the€guilty€plea€was€originally€entered.ðð€€The€Defendant€asserts€that€the€plea€agreement€formÐ 0"€  Ðð ðclearly€indicates€that€the€agreed€upon€sentence€was€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€probation.ðð€Ð #l! ÐThe€plea€agreement€does€include€under€the€ð ðPUNISHMENTðð€sectionÔ#†¼E%»XXél$#ÔÔ‡XéX»¼E%Ô,€the€language€ð ð11€mo.€29€daysÐ $X" Ðsupervised€prob.,ðð€but€it€is€clear€that€the€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€of€supervised€probationÐ ô$D # Ðwas€included€as€part€of€the€judicial€diversion€order.€€For€the€reasons€stated€above,€which€are€notÐ à%0!$ Ðcontested€by€the€Defendant,€the€trial€court€properly€revoked€the€Defendantððs€probation€that€was€a€partÐ Ì&"% Ðof€the€judicial€diversion.€€The€trial€court€then€properly€ordered€the€Defendant€to€serve€two€concurrentÐ ¸'#& Ðsentences€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€with€a€county€jail€program€eligibility€of€thirtyÐ ¤(ô#' Ðpercent.Ð )à$( ÐÌÐ h+¸&* ЇÌà  àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€AFFIRMED.Ð œì ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼E%»XXé…0#ÔÔ€XéX»¼E%ÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð 8 ˆ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àROBERT€W.€WEDEMEYER,€JUDGE