WPC#" 0U: % 0w@4  / 0 / 0DO 0J 0T 0^1 0h 0r 0|i 0 0k 1u 0dp U * B 0@ D3[ B) DC AM G G]v~ AQe 0D| 0D D/ B3vP,cAZ"Arial RegularX(`$TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7GXXdXXd7  01U2E3U45P67U8ӀDB\J#3|xD((3F$ `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7مXXdd7    `   0  (#$  0  2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23    ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Arial d("$    'dxd% Line 7 d""""7Border 1dd* #C << G  !  #d#    ! \RA'\#d#   +"     YYY FILEDX October17,1997CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerk  = !#d#     \RA'\#d#   \RA'\7مXXdd7     Wenotethattheappellantpledguiltytotwocountsofaggravatedrape,oneoffenseoccurringbetweenNovember1,1987andOctober31,1989,andoneoffenseoccurringbetweenNovember1,1989,andNovember30,1989.Inhispetitionand,again,inhisbrief,theappellantonlychallengestheoffensewhichoccurredbetweenNovember1,1989,andNovember30,1989.  !#d#     \RA'\#d#   \RA'\     Moreover,althoughnotquestionedbytheappellantinthepresentproceeding,wewouldfurtherfindthatanysimilarchallengeinthefuturetothepre1989offenseofaggravatedrapeislikewisewithoutmerit.ThedecisionsinHillandWhiteinvolvepost1989indictmentsandspecificallyaddressTenn.CodeAnn.3911301(c)(1990)(requirementofculpablementalstate).Theappealnowbeforethiscourtinvolvesanindictmentreturnedin1987.Priorto1989,theCodedidnotcontainaprovisioncomparabletoTenn.CodeAnn.3911301(c).Accordingly,thedecisionsinHillandWhitedonotcontrolreviewofthisissue.Onthedateoftheoffensesinthiscase,theoffenseofaggravatedraperequiredadefendanttohavean unlawfulor feloniousintent.Tenn.Code.Ann.3902603(1982).Theindictmentinthepresentcasechargedthattheappellantdid unlawfullyand feloniouslycommitthechargedoffense.Thislanguagewassufficientunderthelawasitexistedatthetime.SeeCampbellv.State,491S.W.2d359,361(Tenn.1973)(anindictmentusingthewords feloniouslyor unlawfullyissufficient).PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'`*+ ,-C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  ($$   1  ..' dxdP PdStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ion-F Geneva  ion-F Geneva ! .      \RA'\#Xd##Xd#      *R$%#A1-j|/` e `@R @ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ ATJACKSON@ OCTOBERSESSION,1997HARVEYQUALLS,  )     ) No.02C019610CC00331 Appellant   )     ) LAKECOUNTYvs.     )     ) Hon.JOEG.RILEY,JR.,JudgeBILLYCOMPTON,Warden, )andSTATEOFTENNESSEE, ) (WritofHabeasCorpus)     ) Appellee   ) FortheAppellant:    FortheAppellee: HARVEYQUALLS ,ProSe  CHARLESW.BURSON RegisterNumber150422   AttorneyGeneralandReporterRoute1,Box330 Tiptonville,TN380799775  KENNETHW.RUCKER       AssistantAttorneyGeneral        CriminalJusticeDivision      450JamesRobertsonParkway      Nashville,TN372430493                C.PHILLIPBIVENS       DistrictAttorneyGeneral      P.O.DrawerE      Dyersburg,TN38024      OPINIONFILED:򀀀AFFIRMED DavidG.Hayes ,Judge@  OPINION  Theappellant,HarveyQualls,appealsthetrialcourtsdismissalofhisproseapplicationforwritofhabeascorpus.OnMarch18,1991,theappellantpledguiltyintheShelbyCountyCriminalCourttotwocountsofaggravatedrapeforwhichhereceivedaneffectivesentenceoftwentyfiveyears. &   ׀TheappellantiscurrentlyconfinedattheLakeCountyRegionalCorrectionalFacilityfortheseoffenses.OnAugust12,1996,theappellantfiledanapplicationforawritofhabeascorpusallegingthatthejudgmententeredagainsthimfortheNovember1989aggravatedrapeisvoidbecausetheindictmentfailedtoallegethemensreaoftheoffensecharged.OnAugust16,1996,thetrialcourtfoundthattheappellantspetitionfailedtostate apropersubjectofhabeascorpusreliefsincethejudgmentisnotvoidonitsfaceanddismissedthepetition.Theappellantnowappealsthetrialcourtsdismissal. Afterareviewoftherecord,weaffirmthedecisionofthetrialcourt. Thetrialcourtdismissedtheappellantspetitionforfailuretostateagroundforwhichhabeasreliefwasavailable.Theappellantasserts,relyingexclusivelyuponfederalhabeascorpuslaw,thatthe defectiveindictmentagainsthimeffectivelydeniedthetrialcourtthejurisdictiontoenterajudgmentagainsthim,thereby,renderinghisconvictionsvoid.Werejectthisargumentbytheappellant.InTennessee,habeascorpusreliefisonlyavailablewhenaconvictionisvoidbecausetheconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictionorauthoritytosentenceadefendant,orthatadefendant'ssentencehasexpiredandheisbeingillegallyrestrained.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993).Itiswellestablishedthatallegationsconcerningthesufficiencyoftheindictmentarenotthepropersubjectofstatehabeascorpusrelief.SeeHaggardv.State,475S.W.2d186,187(Tenn.Crim.App.1971);Brownv.State,445S.W.2d669,674(Tenn.Crim.App.1969);Barberv.State,No.01C019408CR00281(Tenn.Crim.App.atNashville,Feb.23,1995).Clearly,theappellantisattemptingtoexpandthescopeofhabeascorpusinTennesseetothatwhichappliesinthefederalcourts.See28U.S.C.S.2241etseq.However,wearenotobligatedtoincorporatefederalhabeaslimitsandlawsintoourstateprocedure.Turksv.State,No.02C019502CR00035(Tenn.Crim.App.atJackson,Jan.3,1997).Thisargumentiswithoutmerit. Moreover,wefindthesubstanceoftheappellantsclaimtobewithoutmerit.Theappellant,inhisapplicationforwritofhabeascorpus,alleges,relyinguponStatev.Hill,No.01C019508CC00267(Tenn.Crim.App.atNashville,June20,1996)andStatev.White,No.03C019408CR00277(Tenn.Crim.App.atKnoxville,June7,1995),thatthejudgmentsenteredagainsthimfortheoffenseaggravatedrapeisvoidbecausetheindictmentfailstoallegethemensreaoftheoffensescharged.Inorderforanindictmenttosatisfybothconstitutionalandstatutoryguidelines,itmustcontainthematerialelementsoftheoffenseandmustsufficientlyapprisetheaccusedoftheoffenseheiscalledupontodefend.Statev.Tate,912S.W.2d785,789(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);seealsoTenn.CodeAnn.4013202(1990);Statev.Perkinson,867S.W.2d1,5(Tenn.Crim.App.1992).Norequisitementalstateisincludedinthedefinitionoftheseoffenses.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3913502(1990).Whenthelegislaturefailstodefineaspecificmentalstateinthedefinitionofanoffense,permittingproofofeitherintent,knowledge,orrecklessness,Tenn.CodeAnn.3911301(c)(1991),anallegationofcriminalconductwillprovidetheaccusedconstitutionallyadequatenoticeofthefactsconstitutingtheoffense.Moreover,sinceunderthesecircumstancestheaccused'smentalstateisnotamaterialelementoftheoffenseandneednotbeincludedintheindictment,theappellantschallengeisnotjurisdictionalinnature,i.e.,adefectthatrenderstheindictmentinvalid.Statev.Dison,No.03C019602CC00051(Tenn.Crim.App.atKnoxville,Jan.31,1997).Otherpanelsofthiscourthaveupheldthevalidityofindictmentsundersimilarchallenges.See,e.g.,Slaglev.State,No.03C019704CR00145(Tenn.Crim.App.atKnoxville,June25,1997);Statev.Vann,No.03C019602CC00066(Tenn.Crim.App.atKnoxville,June10,1997);Statev.James,No.01C019601CR00016(Tenn.Crim.App.atNashville,Mar.27,1997);Statev.Burrell,No.03C019404CR00157(Tenn.Crim.App.atKnoxville,Feb.11,1997). Contrarytotheappellant'sassertions,theallegationsintheindictmentsufficientlyapprisetheaccusedoftheaggravatedrape.Consequently,wefindtheindictmentvalid. '   ׀Thetrialcourt'sdismissaloftheappellant'spetitionforwritofhabeascorpusisaffirmed.     ____________________________________     DAVIDG.HAYES,JudgeCONCUR:___________________________________JOHNH.PEAY,Judge___________________________________PAULG.SUMMERS,Judge